Form 10-K

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes þ No ¨

As of December 31, 2003 the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $114,672,361. Shares of Common Stock held by each officer and director have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

As of August 31, 2004 there were 22,275,277 shares of the Registrant’s common stock outstanding.

Part III—Portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement to be issued in conjunction with the Registrant’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on November 2, 2004.

Index to Financial Statements

The statements contained in this Report on Form 10-K and in the Annual Report that are not purely historical statements are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, including statements regarding the Company’s expectations, beliefs, hopes, intentions or strategies regarding the future. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements. Please see “Risk Factors that May Affect Future Results,” “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and the factors and risks discussed in other reports filed from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Pervasive Software is a global value leader in data infrastructure software. Thousands of businesses worldwide rely on our solutions to help manage, integrate, analyze and secure their critical data. Our data management and integration product lines are designed specifically for small to mid-sized businesses and departments of large enterprises where high performance, flexibility, rapid deployment and low total cost of ownership (TCO) are paramount. In addition, significant portions of our product line are embeddable into commercial applications for sale predominantly to small to mid-size enterprises (SMEs) through a well-developed channel of independent software vendors (ISVs), value-added resellers (VARs) and systems integrators.

Our data management solutions combine high performance and low TCO to provide superior value for ISVs, VARs, our distributors and departments within larger enterprises. Our flagship Pervasive.SQL database, offering unparalleled data management technology combined with very low TCO, has more than 6 million server seats licensed since inception in 1994. The full data management product line also includes specific solutions for data movement and synchronization and addresses security challenges related to data integrity, accountability, continuity and availability throughout the data life cycle. The product line is designed for integration by ISVs into client/server, Web and mobile applications and is predominantly sold to SMEs, which typically have environments with little to no information technology (IT) infrastructure and require self-tuning, low-administration products.

Our data and application integration solutions feature a comprehensive set of visual design tools to rapidly build and test integration processes, regardless of size and complexity, across hundreds of data formats and applications within and outside of the enterprise. The Pervasive Integration product line is designed to grow and scale for the diverse data and application integration needs of mid-sized businesses and departments of large enterprises. Our focus on rapid implementation and ease of use helps reduce the complexity, costs and risks associated with traditional labor-intensive integration methods.

Our strength is evidenced by the size and diversity of our customer base, serving tens of thousands of customers in virtually every industry and market around the world. We sell products worldwide in more than 150 countries through direct sales and channel distribution. Our customer base of more than 35,000 customers includes a distribution channel of more than 10,000 ISVs, developers, VARs, systems integrators and partners who have built or deployed applications on top of our data management platform. We also have a customer base of more than 25,000 end users for our integration products and services. Founded in 1994, Pervasive is headquartered in Austin, Texas, with international offices in Brussels; Frankfurt; London; Paris; Milan; Warsaw and Bangalore; and a joint venture in Japan.

On December 4, 2003, we completed the acquisition of privately held Data Junction Corporation, a data and application integration company based in Austin, Texas. Data Junction spent more than 15 years developing a

Index to Financial Statements

versatile and configurable integration architecture to reduce the complexity, costs and risks associated with traditional labor-intensive integration methods. Data Junction was a pioneer in the software category known as ETL (extract, transform and load) in 1986 with Data Junction v1.0, one of the world’s first hub-and-spoke approaches to data conversion and translation.

We believe the acquisition of Data Junction brings important data integration and transformation technologies and products, which are highly complementary to Pervasive’s existing data management products, expertise and customer base. The acquisition significantly advances Pervasive’s strategy to be the global value leader in data infrastructure software, enabling more than 25,000 businesses, such as major corporations, systems integrators and software vendors, to capitalize on their data investments. Winner of more than 20 major industry awards, Data Junction is a market leader in innovative integration technology, helping customers quickly and cost-effectively connect disparate data sources. Primary integration products include a comprehensive set of visual design tools for rapidly building and testing data integration processes that work with hundreds of data formats and applications. This enables design with total control over all aspects of the integration project—from creating integration maps to managing complex, event-driven flow of inter-application messages and EDI processes.

In early 2004, we unveiled our next generation integration product line based on the acquired Data Junction technology, which forms the foundation of our integration offerings for our extensive global base of long-standing ISV customers and channel partners, mid-sized businesses and departments of large enterprises. Delivering broad functionality, ease of use and ease of deployment at an attractive price, our integration platform offers the right value proposition to a market that has been burdened by overwhelming integration costs and complexity.

Over the past 20 years, businesses of all sizes have invested billions of dollars in application software that enabled them to automate and simplify their business processes. As the sales and implementation of these application packages proliferated since the early-1990s, organizations have faced increasing data and application infrastructure challenges and an entire software market segment has emerged to address these challenges. According to Gartner, Inc., “the growth of the infrastructure software market in the United States can primarily be traced to the demand for technologies that extend the use of established systems, enable the rapid deployment of new applications, and improve the ability to collaborate and communicate with customers and suppliers.”

At the same time, we believe that the software markets as a whole are going through a maturation and commoditization phase. The emergence of Linux and other open source software solutions is testament to this trend. As markets mature and commoditize, having a “value” orientation—delivering the highest performance with the lowest TCO—becomes increasingly critical, particularly when serving SMEs and especially during difficult economic times. Gartner predicts that “through 2007 the small to midsize business segment will lead a recovery in IT spending, which includes infrastructure software, to become the fastest growing revenue opportunity for infrastructure software vendors and resellers.” Infrastructure software includes, among other things, application development tools, integration tools and solutions, business intelligence, database, and security solutions. Gartner estimates the small to midsize business infrastructure software market in the United States will grow from $3.51 billion licensed revenue contribution in 2003 to approximately $8.13 billion in 2007. According to Gartner, infrastructure software will be “a key ingredient for small to midsize businesses that seek to integrate and streamline their back-end systems and eliminate delays in the management and execution of critical processes.”

According to IDC, total spending on data integration worldwide “is expected to increase from $9.3 billion in 2003 to $13.6 billion in 2008. Integration is a dominant theme in almost every organization, large or small, because each organization’s data is not centralized. Whether because of mergers and acquisitions or just successive generations of technology platforms and applications, data typically resides in disparate, heterogeneous,

Index to Financial Statements

distributed databases.” Further, IDC reports, “For every dollar spent on commercial data integration software, organizations spent between $5.30 and $7.90 on related internal and external services, depending on the project type. For the short term, vendors must spend extra effort to show more immediate payback for investments in their products. This is a consequence of the economic slowdown. Tactical solutions will be favored over strategic investments in the short term. Surveys indicate that many organizations continue to favor custom in-house coding over the use of commercial data integration software [and accordingly] additional opportunity clearly exists for data integration software vendors to drive greater market penetration if they can present a more compelling value proposition.”

We believe that maturation and commoditization trends in the software market, trends in the SME market, and trends in the data and application integration market, will favor Pervasive over the competition. We believe that the market for data infrastructure software, in particular, is a maturing and commoditizing market, resulting in significant market disruption due to the high cost of many competing, more labor intensive solutions. We further believe that in maturing and cost sensitive markets, value leaders tend to prevail. Pervasive, with its strengths of high-performance, low cost data management and integration solutions, is well positioned to benefit from the trends in these markets.

Our goal is to be the global value leader in data infrastructure software, enabling businesses to capitalize on their existing and future data investments. Key elements of our strategy are:

Leverage our Core Competencies in Data Infrastructure. We have excelled in simplifying the complexity associated with data management for thousands of client/server applications, representing nearly every industry in every major region of the world. It is extensive communication with a diverse set of customers that enables us to understand their needs and prioritize the requirements for future product development. This includes identifying needs relevant to a particular horizontal or vertical market. Due to our strength in high-volume transaction markets including Accounting, Healthcare, Banking and Financial Services, and Retail Point-of-Sale, we intend to leverage our understanding of, as well as our success in, these markets for new business development.

Our low TCO database is widely installed with more than 6 million server seats licensed since our inception in 1994. Many of these seats are deployed in SME organizations that have not yet adopted the latest generation of our database products. Therefore, we believe we have a significant opportunity in upgrading these seats to our current or next-generation data management products. We plan to reach these customers through our loyal channel of ISVs, VARs, systems integrators and consultants and continue to seek their input to guide our product development activities. We intend to conduct joint marketing programs with our channel partners and customers encouraging upgrades to recent versions of our database, upgrades of additional user counts, upgrades to new or additional platforms, as well as upgrades of the ISVs’ applications themselves.

Our ongoing and past investments in training and educating our customers worldwide, our long-term relationships with ISVs and VARs and our success in encouraging them to embed our products into their applications have created a competitive advantage in the marketplace. We intend to continue to build customer loyalty by providing significant revenue opportunities, meaningful certification programs and other offerings via our enhanced marketing, training, consulting and lead-sharing programs, as well as by ensuring customer satisfaction through the delivery of high quality products and support programs.

Expand the Product Line. We have achieved success in the past by delivering a single product—a data management solution—to run mission-critical applications in tens of thousands of companies. This has been accomplished through the establishment and cultivation of a very large channel. We believe additional success can be achieved by expanding our product line and marketing new products to our established customer base, working through our well developed channel. We have developed a framework for this expansion, which we are

Index to Financial Statements

calling the Pervasive Ecosystem. The Ecosystem is comprised of several new product categories, such as data security, business intelligence and integration. In fiscal year 2003, we announced the release of DataExchange, the acquisition of AuditMaster technology (data security) and the license of full text search technology and on December 4, 2003, we completed the acquisition of Data Junction Corporation (integration). Since the acquisition date, we have segmented the acquired Data Junction product into six separate products, to be more appropriately suited for targeted market segments.

We expect to further invest in product line expansion through continued internal development, licensing and acquisition of new products as well as the extension of existing products into new markets. Product line expansion may also be derived from the acquisition of other complementary data management products and/or companies that represent an opportunity for us to increase the size of our core customer base. We further expect that product line expansion will allow us to enter new channels and new markets.

Capture the Revenue Synergies associated with the Data Junction Acquisition. Revenue synergies associated with the Data Junction acquisition include 1) expanding our international sales opportunities, 2) expanding our penetration of departmental solutions inside of major accounts and through systems integrators, and 3) marketing the Integration products to our existing ISV customers.

We continue to market our expanding integration product line to our customer base across Europe and we believe that our messages are being well received across the spectrum of potential customers. During the latter part of fiscal year 2004, we added integration sales and sales engineering resources in Europe, signed several new regional distribution partners, and introduced the newly created integration product line to our base of international distributors. The new direct sales territories are adding to pipeline opportunities and we have booked some initial orders through our distribution partners. Further, we have expanded our master distribution agreement with our long-time partner in Japan, AG-TECH, to cover the localization, marketing, sales and support of Japanese versions of our integration products. Historically, international sales represented less than 10% of Data Junction’s total revenues, compared to 45% for Pervasive prior to the acquisition, and we are enthusiastic about opportunities represented in our international markets this coming fiscal year.

The second revenue synergy involves extending the reach of the integration products into larger accounts and through systems integrators. To supplement Data Junction’s historically inside telesales focused sales model, we added three major account sales executives in North America and two in Europe during fiscal year 2004, in order to aggressively pursue these large, more relationship-focused sales opportunities. These are the first major account sales executives to ever be involved with the integration product line. New demand-creation and awareness-building programs to target key IT executives will roll out during fiscal year 2005. The early response here is positive, however, we do expect that these sales cycles will be longer than what we have traditionally experienced, so we see these as longer-term investments.

The third revenue synergy revolves around delivering a suite of integration products to our existing channel of ISV customers, initially, to speed the movement of data in the field when they win competitive deals, and to enable them to pre-wire their products with embedded integration to interoperate with adjacent business applications.

These potential revenue synergies are significant across all of our products, channels and geographies, and we took steps during fiscal year 2004 to begin to realize these opportunities which leverage our extensive channel of ISVs, geographic breadth and ability to monetize the integration products more broadly in the global marketplace. These steps include the early stages of product segmentation within our integration product line, resulting in a product line more closely aligned with the requirements of our ISV customers. To this end, we released three embeddable versions of our low-total cost of ownership integration technology, namely, Pervasive Data Migrator^™ Embedded, Pervasive Data Integrator^™ Embedded, and Pervasive Business Integrator^™ Embedded, specifically targeted for use by ISVs worldwide to help them to pre-wire competitive advantage into their applications to better fit within customer infrastructure, vastly improving data and application integration

Index to Financial Statements

capabilities. We intend to continue investing in product marketing and sales activities focused on leveraging our integration product line through our well developed, existing channel of ISVs. Given the sales cycles for selling to an ISV with perhaps thousands of end user customers and given the development processes and schedules of our ISV customers, we see this as our longest-term investment in revenue synergies associated with the Data Junction acquisition.

Pursue growth by acquisition and complementary business partnerships. We have a dedicated team of corporate development and business development professionals who are focused on the growth opportunities for our business via acquisition of companies and technologies and by building upon the relationships we have formed with current strategic partners. We also intend to invest in partnerships that provide us with meaningful benefits, including increased market recognition and visibility, access to new markets, customers, sales channels and consulting services, and diversification of and valuable improvements to our product line.

Remain Committed to Continued Profitability. Since March 2001, we have reported fourteen consecutive quarters of profitability. Our profitability has been consistent with our quarterly financial guidance and is a result of: 1) our sharp focus on our core data management business; 2) our solid execution of a significant acquisition; and 3) prudent expense management. This excellent performance was achieved in the midst of a very difficult economic environment. We remain committed to profitability and believe it will continue through our prudent management of expenses, increasing marketing and sales productivity around the globe and as a result of our next-generation product releases and product line expansion anticipated in fiscal year 2005 and beyond.

To further demonstrate our commitment to continued profitability, in fiscal year 2004 we continued to develop our product engineering infrastructure in India, which will enable us to speed the time required for bringing new products to market at competitive prices. Our approach here is to diversify our global development capabilities and accomplish more with our current levels of actual and projected spending. We took our commitment to a new level by signing a lease in Bangalore for 5,500 square feet, and we are actively working to fill a variety of technical positions. We are beginning to realize some of the benefits of a more globalized production methodology, and these benefits are being reinvested back into the business to drive our growth initiatives.

Our software products offer customers a proven, cost-effective way to manage, integrate, secure and analyze their data. Delivered both directly and through ISVs, VARs, systems integrators and other vendors, our products are designed to provide solid business value while reducing the time, complexity and cost associated with data infrastructure projects. Our focus on high value solutions that provide low TCO, reflects our belief in the strategic importance of this value proposition for our customers, where high performance, flexibility for growth, and time to market are paramount.

We offer a wide range of products for secure data management that deliver faster ROI, greater business flexibility, enhanced revenue opportunities and proven accountability for data infrastructure investments at a lower total cost of ownership.

Pervasive.SQL^™, our core database product offering, combines the high performance associated with enterprise-class databases with numerous low-maintenance features and is ideally suited for client/server, Web and mobile mission-critical applications deployed on a variety of the most popular operating systems.

Index to Financial Statements

Our most-recent version, Pervasive.SQL V8, was released in December 2002. Development began in 2003 on the next major release of Pervasive.SQL, which is slated for release in fiscal year 2005. Pervasive.SQL 9 will incorporate many of the most-requested customer features and benefits, as well as a boost in SQL performance, providing compelling reasons for upgrades and competitive wins in the marketplace.

Pervasive DataExchange^™ Real-Time Backup Edition, our core replication offering, offers targeted solutions to data movement and synchronization problems like maintaining an offsite warm backup, driving transactional data into a data portal, and connecting remote databases. DataExchange solutions feature a combination of product and services customized for the business problem to be solved:

While Pervasive DataExchange^™ Real-Time Backup Edition is most appropriate for organizations that handle constantly changing data requiring up-to-the-minute replication, Pervasive Backup Agent^™ is best suited for customers needing weekly or nightly copies and protection of their data. The two products address different needs driven by the desired backup frequency, but, in many situations, both products will be run side-by-side since they do have separate strengths. As a technology extension to our core database, Backup Agent can be completely embedded into applications. This simple to deploy, low-cost product is tailored for SMEs that require regular backup of their business data. Backup Agent helps provide the integrity and consistency of replicated data by keeping the Pervasive.SQL^™ database up and running in continuous operations mode while a duplicate copy is being made. When installed directly onto a server along with Pervasive.SQL, the product requires no configuration settings and no database administrator maintenance. Pervasive Backup Agent can be integrated into existing backup processes and should be run in conjunction with complementary third-party backup products.

Pervasive AuditMaster^™, our core security product offering, monitors and reports all activity occurring in a Pervasive.SQL database, leveraging deep-level capture, report and alert technology to enable monitoring of mission critical data without the high costs of application redevelopment and deployment, training, or on-going maintenance. This technology is particularly relevant in the accounting and healthcare markets, both of which are presently dealing with increased regulatory requirements brought about by the Sarbanes Oxley Act and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). AuditMaster provides data access accountability by means of three modules:

Index to Financial Statements

In response to the growing need for ad hoc search capabilities in Pervasive.SQL powered software applications, we acquired a license to search engine technology in June 2003 for release to the global market of Pervasive.SQL ISVs. Slated for inclusion in Pervasive.SQL 9, our new search functionality will allow application developers to incorporate powerful text and numeric search capabilities directly into their Pervasive.SQL-based applications with a minimum of development effort. With our search functionality, developers can build custom search User Interfaces directly into their applications allowing the application’s end user to quickly search for any data in the Pervasive.SQL database using simple text queries rather than complicated SQL syntax. Matching results are returned through XML allowing the application developer to determine the best way to display those results to the end user.

Based on technology acquired from Data Junction Corporation, Pervasive’s integration product line now augments the company’s industry-leading low-TCO data management software offerings. Our integration products for data infrastructure management have been developed on a single, open integration platform designed to grow and scale for diverse integration projects, providing the industry’s best combination of performance, flexibility and total cost of ownership.

Our integration products reduce the complexity, costs and risks associated with traditional labor-intensive integration methods by providing a versatile and configurable integration architecture for rapid implementation and ease of use. This flexibility enables mid-sized businesses and departments of large enterprises to create and fine-tune their solutions for frequently changing business needs and requirements. Our integration products, which feature a comprehensive set of easy-to-use visual design tools to rapidly build and test integration processes, regardless of size and complexity, across hundreds of data formats and applications within and outside of the enterprise, include:

Index to Financial Statements

The Pervasive Data Migration Toolkit provides native connectivity to more than 100 different types of data sources and targets, which reduces the time needed to understand data structures and provides the highest processing performance during the migration itself. The easy-to-use visual mapping tools of Map Designer^™ allow a user to quickly map and transform source data—robust database files, COBOL data and even spreadsheets—to the target, regardless of the target’s data structure. A rich scripting language is also available for more sophisticated transformation needs.

With native connectivity to so many data targets and sources, no interim file structures are needed to complete the migration, ensuring maximum performance during the migration itself. The proven, underlying migration engine then handles large and small data files, making the product perfect for most migration projects around an organization. The Migration Toolkit runs on the Windows platform, but can reach data on almost any operating system.

To gain a whole-business view for analysis and improved decision-making ability, organizations face the challenge of timely and efficiently aggregating data from across all information sources into centralized stores. Pervasive Data Integrator provides access to nearly any data source, including unstructured data, and allows users to transform and load data warehouses, data marts or other target systems.

Pervasive Data Integrator provides the developer with a collection of easy-to-learn graphical tools fit for rapid design and maintenance of one-off or recurring processes that move data from one format to another leveraging more than 120 connectors to a wide variety of data sources and targets. Pervasive Data Integrator also comes with full automation capabilities including command line interfaces for setting up recurring, scheduled ETL processing.

Pervasive Business Integrator attacks business integration challenges head-on with an infrastructure specially built for cost-effective, flexible integration of very complex application processes and data flows, both within and outside the organization.

Index to Financial Statements

Specially suited for message-driven application integration, the Pervasive Business Integrator development environment enables the developer to quickly define and maintain message processing between multiple applications.

Pervasive Business Integrator provides the developer with a collection of tools fit for rapid design and maintenance of processes that translate business documents and manage their flow between business systems and those of trading partners using a near real-time, event driven model. With over 150 different connectors, including connectivity to messaging interfaces like SAP Idocs, message queue interfaces for MSMQ from IBM and Sonic Software, and pre-built support for standards-based messaging such as EDI, EDIFACT, HIPAA, HL7, FIX and more, Pervasive’s Business Integrator is the ideal tool for building application integration projects.

Many SME organizations with limited IT resources, as well as departments of larger enterprises, rely on our channel to help them develop, deploy, maintain and integrate business-critical data and packaged applications. Our products and marketing approach are specifically tailored to meet the needs of our channel partners and their customers. We believe our sharp focus on our customers and their end-users provides us with multiple sales opportunities, a cost-effective, value-added source of service and technical support and a large, loyal and well-educated channel that develops and deploys applications using our offerings.

Our channel sales and marketing organizations focus on our worldwide channels by targeting software developers who build client/server, Web and mobile applications and the Web and systems integrators, consultants and value-added resellers who sell and implement the applications to end users. Our marketing organization has primary responsibility for product direction and has developed a number of programs utilized by the sales organization to support our channel partners, such as our Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) program for ISVs and partner programs for Web and systems integrators, consultants and VARs. These programs are worldwide in scope and capture leads from a variety of activities including direct response marketing and advertising, joint marketing and public relations.

Our OEM program focuses on recruiting and retention of independent software vendors worldwide who embed our products on an OEM basis. The OEM program is designed to build mutually beneficial strategic relationships between Pervasive and ISVs and generate ongoing royalties for us through licensing contracts, which are typically for three-year terms. This program offers our OEM partners joint marketing services, volume discounts, specialized technical support, training and consulting, which enable delivery of tightly integrated solutions to end users.

Our other sales and marketing programs recruit and retain software developers and channel partners who develop applications that are designed to be deployed with shrink-wrap versions of our data management products. These programs include trade shows, direct mail, telemarketing and telesales activities and hands-on seminars that are designed to further recruit, develop, support and train software developers and channel partners to facilitate the deployment of client/server, Web and mobile applications based on our products. If the sales volumes of these applications become sufficient, the sales group recruits these software developers into our OEM program.

Our international channel sales organization utilizes a channel of distribution partners and OEMs worldwide. The distribution partners implement sales and marketing programs for a particular region, typically using our distributor or master distributor programs. In addition to managing these distributor relationships, the international sales group recruits and supports software developers and channel partners with the same programs as the domestic sales groups. We currently have international offices located in Brussels, Frankfurt, Paris, London, Milan, Warsaw and Bangalore and a joint venture in Japan.

Index to Financial Statements

Unlike typical SME organizations, many mid size companies and larger enterprises have access to greater IT resources, and therefore tend to rely less on third parties for packaged solutions. Our approach for reaching these prospective customers is based generally on a direct marketing and direct sales model.

Our direct marketing efforts are comprised largely of in-house direct email/mail campaigns, specifically targeting IT departments and business managers as well as vertical marketing initiatives aimed at the Financial, Banking and Healthcare sectors. While our primary focus is on small to mid size enterprises and departments within larger businesses, our products often scale to satisfy the needs of large enterprises resulting in direct sales to these organizations. The primary goal of these marketing campaigns is to direct potential customers back to our corporate Web site and have them download white papers, strategic reports, and other general strategic marketing materials as well as trial versions of our software products, in particular, our integration products. Through our press and industry analyst relationships, the marketing team seeks industry endorsements that drive target customer buying within the integration segment.

We employ a sales model that sells directly into enterprises at both the corporate and departmental level. Sales Executives are part of a well defined and comprehensive sales process based upon a sales methodology used by everyone in the sales organization that contains six stages from initial interest through evaluation and negotiation. The sales force is supported by customer relationship management system software (CRM) that supports the sales methodology, combined with sales quoting and accounting software, as well as a staff of highly trained Sales Engineers who provide high quality technical pre-sales support during the sales cycle.

Because of the small footprint of our software combined with the its ease of use, we enjoy the benefits of deploying a sales model that is primarily through a staff of Inside Sales Executives which maximizes the effectiveness of a strategic staff of Field Sales Executives. This model facilitates conducting the majority of our sales efforts via a telephone/web-demonstration process composed of interviews with potential customers to determine their interest level and needs, resulting in on-target product recommendations. As a result, a combination of customer-needs driven interactive demonstrations of our products using the Internet for presentation often with a specific problem from the customer shown as a proof of concept is produced. By using the Internet for delivering these proofs of concept and the interactive demonstrations, Pervasive is able to maintain a lower sales cost which ultimately translates into our ability to offer greater integration capabilities at an overall lower total cost of ownership. The process described above allows a relatively small team of highly capable Field Sales Executives to focus on strategic sales opportunities, which typically represent our larger customers.

We offer multiple levels of worldwide customer services, including technical support and product maintenance. First level, or front line, support responds to most customer inquiries that are routine in scope via telephone and email. Second level, or back line, support responds to escalated technical issues and supports our large partners with dedicated technical expertise.

Our Customer Service department is committed to understanding the wide variety of business applications involving data management and integration. In order to assist customers quickly and successfully, a great deal of domain knowledge must be acquired by each member of the team. Each Technical Support specialist must have a working knowledge of a broad range of relational database management systems, including UNIX, SQL queries, VB, Java, among many others. In addition, developer level support ensures that developers can obtain assistance from a team knowledgeable in the developer’s programming language and toolset of choice, resulting in a shortened time to market for the developer’s internal or commercial application.

Our Web site includes a comprehensive on-line support area that is monitored and updated continually by the Customer Service department. With this extensive library of Web-based resources, customers have 24/7 access to the documentation, maintenance releases, FAQs, interactive tutorials and knowledge base they need to

Index to Financial Statements

answer their questions and resolve their problems quickly and easily. Customers may also submit an electronic support request form, via the Web site, to Customer Service inquiring about specific problems or requesting support for more detailed, particular concerns.

Worldwide customer services are provided through our corporate offices in Austin, Texas. International customer services are complemented by our call center in Brussels, Belgium and via our multi-lingual support Website.

The Professional Services Division (PSD) is focused primarily on maximizing integration ROI for customers. This division, consisting of Implementation Services and Training Services, has steadily built a record of success and fast deployment for clients in its four years of existence.

In order to provide further evidence of the performance of our integration tools and applications, PSD can develop proofs of concept and benchmarks on a sample of a customer’s integration project, or on other sample migration or integration processes. Through PSD’s consultative experience, it can also suggest ways to improve and optimize throughput or system performance.

PSD works closely with clients to architect and build special applications and/or functionality around the integration tools as needed to optimize project performance. PSD also works with clients to ensure that the integration tools are properly embedded and have full connectivity to other internal or external applications.

The Implementation Services group in PSD is available to assist customers, partners and sales prospects with benchmarking/proof of concept, rapid, client-oriented deployment and implementation, or long-term consulting. Our team is composed of developers, product specialists, and business analysts devoted to delivering customer and partner success.

The Training Services group in PSD provides multiple training options each month in Austin, Texas. These classes are open to all licensed users of the current version of our software. Users can take standard product training and follow-up with focused workshop sessions. Additional consulting time can be scheduled after each session to augment course learning. The same courses and workshops are also available on-site at the customer’s location.

PSD will also fulfill demand for fee-based consulting services from our software developer customers and channel partners. These consulting services may include development services to migrate applications on competing databases to Pervasive.SQL, migrate existing applications to the Web, upgrade existing applications to the latest Pervasive.SQL release, and optimize database functionality through performance testing, database schema design and review, and the delivery of services related to our DataExchange, AuditMaster or Full Text Search offerings. Consulting opportunities are often referred to our channel partners to strengthen channel loyalty, build the channel’s technical ability and increase the resource base available for future growth.

We have made substantial investments in research and development through both internal development and technology acquisition. As of June 30, 2004, we had 58 employees in research and development, in addition to more than 20 contract developers with a third party Indian development partner, and our research and development expenditures for fiscal years 2002, 2003 and 2004 were $7.1 million, $8.0 million and $10.0 million, respectively. We will continue to invest heavily in focused research and development resources to further our vision of the future of data infrastructure software, enabling businesses to capitalize on their existing and future data investments.

Index to Financial Statements

Our development efforts consist primarily of driving significant levels of innovation into new and current product lines with primary goals being continuous improvement of the performance of existing product features, the addition of new differentiating product features to simplify development with our products, deployment and use of our products, and the on-going investment in emerging platform opportunities.

Our research and development investments in fiscal 2005 are focused on the following:

We encounter competition for our data management products primarily from large, public companies, in particular, Sybase’s small memory footprint database software product, SQL Anywhere, and Microsoft’s database product, SQL Server. Microsoft has devoted resources to making its SQL Server product increasingly

Index to Financial Statements

applicable to the market for our products. We believe that Microsoft will continue to incorporate SQL Server technology into its operating system software and certain of its server software offerings, possibly at no additional cost to its users. Microsoft’s activities could materially adversely affect sales of our products on the Windows platform.

The market for data and application integration products is very fragmented. And, as with integration challenges themselves, the market for integration solutions is constantly changing. The primary competition for our integration products has historically been custom code. In addition to custom code, however, we compete with a large number of vendors in a variety of markets and verticals. For example, in the ETL market our primary competitors include: Ab Initio, Ascential Software, DataMirror, Embarcadero and Informatica. In the EAI and B2Bi markets, we compete primarily against: Ascential Software (through their acquisition of Mercator) Vitria, WebMethods, Tibco and SeeBeyond. We also compete against providers of solutions in the database market. Such competition includes Oracle, Microsoft with DTS in their SQL Server Platform, and Microsoft BizTalk. And since we have solutions targeted to two verticals, financial and healthcare, we also face competitors that provide vertical solutions. Many of our competitors rely heavily on services revenue related to their product offerings. However, we believe the value of integration solutions is not maximized unless the labor element of integration projects is substantially reduced through automation. Therefore, we have always emphasized ease-of-use as a key value proposition to our customers.

In addition, because there are relatively low barriers to entry in the software market, we may encounter additional competition from other established and emerging companies.

Our success depends to a significant degree on our ability to protect our software and other proprietary technology. We rely primarily on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions to protect our proprietary rights. Furthermore, we use third-party service providers in India for some of our development and the laws of India do not protect proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. In addition, we rely in part on “shrink wrap” and “click wrap” licenses that are not signed by the end user and, therefore, may be unenforceable under the laws of certain jurisdictions. We also believe that factors, such as the technological and creative skills of our personnel, new research and developments, frequent product enhancements, name recognition and reliable product maintenance are essential to establishing and maintaining a technology leadership position.

We have one U.S. patent which was originally granted to Data Junction in 1999. We have five pending patent applications in the U.S. for integration product technology and one pending foreign patent application for integration product technology. We have three pending patent applications in the U.S. for database technology and one pending foreign patent application for database technology. The validity of our patent could be challenged, as could any future allowed patents. It is also possible that our pending applications will not be allowed. Our patents alone may not provide us with any significant competitive advantage.

As of June 30, 2004, Pervasive employed 245 full-time employees, including 104 in sales and marketing, 58 in research and development, 48 in professional services, customer service and technical support, and 35 in general and administrative. We are not subject to any collective bargaining agreement, and we believe that our relationships with our employees are good.

Our leased headquarters facility in Austin, Texas, consists of approximately 91,000 square feet. The facility provides additional space and expansion options and is leased through September 2008. We currently lease international offices in Brussels, Frankfurt, Paris, London, Milan, Warsaw and Bangalore.

Index to Financial Statements

You should carefully consider the risks described below before making an investment decision. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Any of the following risks could harm our business, financial condition or results of operations. In such case, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment. Please see the “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” elsewhere in this Report on Form 10-K.

Our operating results have varied significantly from quarter to quarter at times in the past and may continue to vary significantly from quarter to quarter in the future due to a variety of factors. Many of these factors are outside of our control. These factors include:

We derive a significant portion of our revenues from relatively large transactions. The sales cycles for these transactions tend to be longer than the sales cycles on smaller orders. This longer sales cycle for large transactions makes it difficult to predict the quarter in which these sales will occur. Accordingly, our operating results may fluctuate from quarter to quarter based on the existence and timing of larger transactions. A reduction in large transactions during any quarter could materially impact our revenues.

Index to Financial Statements

Our revenue growth and profitability depend on the overall demand for our products and services, which in turn depends on general economic and business conditions. The nature and extent of the effect of the current economic climate on our ability to sell our products and services is uncertain. A softening of demand for our products and services caused by weakening of the economy may result in decreased revenues or lower growth rates. There can be no assurance that we will be able to effectively promote revenue growth rates in all economic conditions.

Significant portions of our expenses are not variable in the short term and cannot be quickly reduced to respond to decreases in revenues. Therefore, if our revenues are below our expectations, our operating results are likely to be adversely and disproportionately affected. In addition, we may change our prices, modify our distribution strategy and policies, accelerate our investment in research and development, sales or marketing efforts in response to competitive pressures or pursue new market opportunities. Any one of these activities may further limit our ability to adjust spending in response to revenue fluctuations.

Seasonality May Contribute to Fluctuations in Our Quarterly Operating Results

Our business has, on occasion, experienced seasonal customer buying patterns. In recent years, we have generally experienced relatively weaker demand in the quarters ending March 31 and September 30. We believe that this pattern may continue. In addition, we anticipate that demand for our products in Europe and Japan will decline in the summer months because of reduced corporate buying patterns during the vacation season.

We generally operate with virtually no order backlog because our software products are shipped and revenue is recognized shortly after orders are received. This lack of backlog makes product revenues in any quarter substantially dependent on orders booked and shipped throughout that quarter.

We derive a substantial portion of our revenues from the license of our Pervasive.SQL products. Continued market acceptance of Pervasive.SQL may be influenced heavily by factors outside of our control such as new product offerings or promotions by competitors, mergers and acquisitions of customers and competitors, the product development and deployment cycles of developers and resellers who embed or bundle our products into packaged software applications and demand for applications of the type built on our products. Market acceptance of Pervasive.SQL V8 and future upgrades also may be influenced by factors in our control such as product quality, relative demand for feature and functionality upgrades and any future product announcements or price changes.

In general, our database business is a relatively mature business and our database product, Pervasive.SQL, is experiencing increasing pressure to generate revenue due to a variety of factors, including but not limited to, the length of time since our last major version release of our database product (December 2002), increasing competition and what we believe to be the increasingly negative impact of general economic conditions on our ISV customers who build applications utilizing our database software and reduced demand for the ISVs’ software applications themselves. However, revenue from recently introduced add-on products for our database products, namely AuditMaster and Data Exchange did generate database related revenue in fiscal year 2004 as we continue to market these add-on products to our large base of database customers. In addition, we believe the integration products we acquired in fiscal year 2004 represent a compelling growth opportunity as we invest in revenue synergies and opportunities presented by the acquired business, combined with our historical database business and channels. A significant reduction in our database business, or our inability to grow our integration products business, could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

Our Efforts to Develop and Maintain Brand Awareness of Our Products May Not be Successful

Brand awareness is important given competition in the market for data infrastructure software products. We are aware of other companies that use the word “Pervasive” either in their marks alone or in combination with

Index to Financial Statements

other words. We expect that it may be difficult or impossible to prevent third-party usage of the Pervasive name and variations of this name for competing goods and services. Competitors or others who use marks similar to our brand name may cause confusion among actual and potential customers, which could prevent us from achieving significant brand recognition. If we fail to promote and maintain our brand or incur significant related expenses, our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

We May Face Problems with Our Recent Acquisition of Data Junction Corporation

On December 8, 2003, we announced the completion of our acquisition of privately held Data Junction Corporation, a pioneering data and application integration company based in Austin, Texas, for approximately $16.6 million in cash, net of $6.5 million of cash held by Data Junction at the time of the closing of the transaction, and 5 million shares of our common stock. We cannot be certain that the acquisition of Data Junction will be successful or that we will realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisition. In particular, we may not realize the strategic and operational benefits and objectives we had anticipated, including, greater revenue and market opportunities, maintaining industry leadership and consistent profitability. In addition, the demand for our combined product offerings may fluctuate and we may face increased competition in the markets for our products. Any of these factors may have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

We Must Succeed in the Data Management Infrastructure Software Market as well as the Data Integration Software Market if we are to Realize the Expected Benefits of the Merger

Our long-term strategic plan depends upon the successful development and introduction of products and solutions that address the needs of the data management infrastructure software market as well as the data integration software market. In order for us to succeed in these markets, we must align strategies and objectives and focus a significant portion of our resources towards serving these markets.

In addition, our success in these markets will depend on several factors, many of which are outside our control including:

If we are unable to succeed in this market our business may be harmed and we may be prevented from realizing the anticipated benefits of the merger.

We Must Overcome Significant Challenges in Integrating Business Operations and Product Offerings in order to Realize the Benefits of the Acquisition of Data Junction

The merger will not achieve its anticipated benefits unless we successfully combine our operations with those of Data Junction and integrate the two companies’ business operations and products in a timely manner.

Index to Financial Statements

Fully integrating Pervasive and Data Junction is a complex, time-consuming and expensive process and may result in revenue disruption and operational difficulties if not completed in a timely and efficient manner. Prior to the merger, each company operated independently, each with its own business, business culture, markets, clients, employees and systems. Following the merger, we must operate as a combined organization utilizing common (1) information communication systems, (2) operating procedures, (3) financial controls and (4) human resource practices, including benefits, training and professional development programs. There may be substantial difficulties, costs and delays involved in the integration. These difficulties, costs and delays may include:

We may not succeed in addressing these risks or any other problems encountered in connection with the merger. If the benefits of the merger do not exceed the costs associated with the merger, including any dilution to our stockholders resulting from the issuance of shares in connection with the merger, our financial results could be harmed.

The market price of our common stock could decline as a result of the merger, based on the occurrence of a number of events, including:

There May be Sales of Substantial Amounts of Pervasive Common Stock after the Merger, which could cause Our Stock Price to Fall

A substantially large number of shares of our common stock may be sold into the public market within a short period of time following the closing of the merger. As a result, our stock price could fall. Of the approximately 5,000,000 shares of our common stock issued in connection with this merger, approximately 203,000 shares were immediately available for resale by the former shareholders of Data Junction and approximately 4,797,000 shares of our common stock are subject to “lock-up” agreements that restrict the timing of the resale of these shares. Under the lock-up agreements, the shares were released and available for sale in the public market 270 days after the closing date of the merger. However, approximately 4,652,000 of the 4,797,000 shares of our common stock subject to “lock-up” agreements may only be sold in compliance with the time, manner and volume limitations of Rule 144 for a period of two years from such holder’s last day of employment with Pervasive or five years from the closing, whichever is later. A sale of a large number of newly released shares of our common stock could therefore result in a sharp decline in our stock price. In addition, the sale of these shares could impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional stock.

Index to Financial Statements

We May Face Problems in Connection With Past Acquisitions, Joint Ventures or Licensing Arrangements Other than the Recent Acquisition of Data Junction

In July 2003, we licensed technology from ABACUS Research A.G., a software development company based in St. Gallen, Switzerland. The licensed technology enables users to perform advanced searches into application and Web portal data, providing sub-second responses across large databases. We licensed the technology for $600,000. Following a productization and integration effort, availability of this technology is planned for fiscal year 2005. We cannot be certain that the productization and integration effort will be successful.

In April 2003, we purchased a database transaction intelligence technology from ThinkNet Inc., a software development company based in Toronto, Ontario. The acquired technology provides a continuous, comprehensive and auditable view of an application’s database operations, such as who did what when, where and how. It consists of a Pervasive.SQL logging plug-in, a query and analysis module, and a sophisticated business rules engine. It also alerts administrators to events according to predefined business rules and reports activity efficiently for analysis. We acquired the technology for $550,000 in cash. Following a productization and integration effort, a new product, Pervasive Audit Master, was launched in the second quarter of fiscal 2004. We cannot be certain that the market acceptance or demand for this new product will meet our expectations.

In July 2001, we formed a new business venture with AG-TECH Corporation, a company developing, selling and importing packaged software, to sell and support our products in Japan. AG-TECH has been engaged in the sales and support of Btrieve (predecessor to Pervasive.SQL) and Pervasive.SQL products since 1986. In conjunction with the joint venture, AG-TECH launched a new operating division staffed with specialists experienced in selling and supporting Pervasive.SQL to assume responsibility for OEM sales, packaged software sales, technical support and localization and translation of our products into Japanese. In connection with the new business venture, we obtained a less than 20% ownership interest in AG-TECH and the ability to elect one director to the AG-TECH Board of Directors. While this venture has been successful to date, we cannot be certain that this venture will continue to be successful which could result in our inability to successfully operate in Japan. In addition, as a part of our venture, we executed a three year master distributor agreement with AG-TECH, the initial term of which expired June 30, 2004. This agreement has been renewed for an additional three-year term which expires June 30, 2007. We cannot be certain that we will continue to be able to renew our agreement with AG-TECH on terms and conditions at least as favorable to Pervasive as those contained in our present agreement. Further, we may be unable to maintain or increase Japanese market demand for our products.

We May Face Problems in Connection With Future Acquisitions, Joint Ventures or Licensing Arrangements

In the future, we may acquire additional businesses, products and technologies, or enter into joint venture or licensing arrangements, that could complement, modify or expand our business. Our negotiations of potential acquisitions or joint ventures and our integration of acquired businesses, products or technologies could divert management time and resources. Any future acquisitions could require us to issue dilutive equity securities, reduce our cash and marketable securities, incur debt or contingent liabilities, amortize intangibles, or write-off purchased research and development and other acquisition-related expenses. If we are unable to fully integrate acquired businesses, products or technologies with our existing operations, we may not receive the intended benefits of acquisitions. In addition, market reactions to acquisitions are difficult to predict and if we do announce any future acquisitions, such market reactions may cause our stock price to fluctuate.

In the future, we may acquire, license or develop additional products. Future product line expansion may require us to modify or expand our business. If we are unable to fully integrate new products with our existing operations, we may not receive the intended benefits of such product line expansion.

Index to Financial Statements

A Small Number of Distributors and Sales Related to Accounting Software Applications Account For a Significant Percentage of Our Revenues

The loss of a major distributor, changes in a distributor’s payment practices, changes in the financial stability of a major distributor or any reduction in orders by such distributor, including reductions due to market or competitive conditions combined with the potential inability to replace the distributor on a timely basis, or any modifications to our pricing or distribution channel strategy could materially adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition. Many of our ISVs, VARs and end users place their orders through distributors. A relatively small number of distributors have accounted for a significant percentage of our revenues. In the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, two distributors combined accounted for an aggregate of approximately 17% of our revenues, as compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003, when two distributors accounted for an aggregate of approximately 22% of our revenues. Additionally, we estimate that approximately 20% of our revenues in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 were from sales related to accounting software applications. Furthermore, there is currently consolidation taking place among our ISVs that could narrow the number of customers who sell our products. For example, one of our ISVs, The Sage Group plc, recently announced that it has acquired Timberline Software Corporation, Softline Limited, and ACCPAC International Inc., three of our ISVs. These four ISVs together represented approximately 10% of our revenues in fiscal 2004. Accordingly, our sales to The Sage Group plc could constitute 10% or more of our revenues in the future. As a result, we expect we will continue to depend on a limited number of distributors, certain of our ISV customers and sales related to accounting software applications for a significant portion of our revenues in future periods and the loss of a significant distributor or ISV customer could materially adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition. Moreover, we expect that such distributors and sales related to accounting software applications will vary from period to period. Our distributors have not agreed to any minimum order requirements. Although we forecast demand and plan accordingly, if a distributor purchases excess product, we may be obligated to accept the return of some products.

Our failure to continue to grow our indirect sales channel or the loss of a significant number of members of our indirect channel partners would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results. We derive a substantial portion of our revenues from indirect sales through a channel consisting of independent software vendors, value-added resellers, systems integrators, consultants and distributors. Our sales channel could be adversely affected by a number of factors including:

We cannot be certain we will be able to continue to attract additional indirect channel partners or retain our current partners. In addition, we cannot be certain our competitors will not attempt to recruit certain of our current or future partners. For example, in December 2000, Microsoft (a competitor) acquired Great Plains Software (an OEM that embeds our product into certain of its products and also a channel partner). This may have, and any similar transactions may have, an adverse effect on our ability to attract and retain partners.

Our current collaborative relationships may not prove to be beneficial to us, and they may not be sustained. We may not be able to enter into successful new strategic relationships in the future, which could have a material

Index to Financial Statements

adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. From time to time, we have collaborated with other companies in areas such as product development, marketing, distribution and implementation. However, many of our current and potential strategic partners are either actual or potential competitors with us. In addition, many of our current relationships are informal or, if written, terminable with little or no notice.

We rely upon certain software that we license from third parties, including software integrated with our internally developed software and used in our products to perform key functions. These third-party software licenses may not continue to be available to us on commercially reasonable terms. The loss of, or inability to maintain or obtain any of these software licenses, could result in shipment delays or reductions until we develop, identify, license and integrate equivalent software. Any delay in product development or shipment could damage our business, operating results and financial condition.

We May be Unable to Protect Our Intellectual Property and Proprietary Rights

Our success depends to a significant degree upon our ability to protect our software and other proprietary technology. We rely primarily on a combination of copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions to protect our proprietary rights. However, these measures afford us only limited protection. Furthermore, we use third-party service providers in India for some of our development and the laws of India do not protect proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. In addition, we rely in part on “shrink wrap” and “click wrap” licenses that are not signed by the end user and, therefore, may be unenforceable under the laws of certain jurisdictions. Therefore, our efforts to protect our intellectual property may not be adequate. We cannot be certain that others will not develop technologies that are similar or superior to our technology or design around the copyrights and trade secrets owned by us. Unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of our products or to obtain and use information we regard as proprietary. Although we believe software piracy may be a problem, we are unable to determine the extent to which piracy of our software products occurs. In addition, portions of our source code are developed in foreign countries with laws that do not protect our proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States.

We may be subjected to claims of intellectual property infringement by third parties as the number of products and competitors in our industry segment continues to grow and the functionality of products in different industry segments increasingly overlaps. Any infringement claims, with or without merit, could be time-consuming, result in costly litigation, divert management attention and resources, cause product shipment delays or the loss or deferral of sales or require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements. Such royalty or licensing agreements, if required, may not be available on terms acceptable to us, if at all. In the event of a successful claim of intellectual property infringement against us, should we fail or be unable to either license the technology or similar technology or develop alternative technology on a timely basis, our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

Our future success will depend upon our ability to continue to enhance our current products and to develop and introduce new products on a timely basis that keep pace with technological developments and new industry standards and satisfy increasingly sophisticated customer requirements. Rapid technological change, frequent new product introductions and enhancements, uncertain product life cycles, changes in customer demands and evolving industry standards characterize the market for our products. The introduction of products embodying new technologies and the emergence of new industry standards can render existing products obsolete and unmarketable. As a result of the complexities inherent in client/server and Web computing environments and in data and application integration solutions, and the performance demanded by customers for data infrastructure software products, new products and product enhancements can require long development and testing periods. As a result, significant delays in the general availability of such new releases or significant problems in the

Index to Financial Statements

installation or implementation of such new releases could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. We have experienced delays in the past in the release of new products and new product enhancements. We may not be successful in:

Errors or defects in our products may result in loss of revenues or delay in market acceptance, and could materially adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition. Software products such as ours may contain errors, sometimes called “bugs,” particularly when first introduced or when new versions or enhancements are released. From time to time, we discover software errors in certain of our new products after their introduction. Despite our testing, current versions, new versions or enhancements of our products may still have errors after commencement of commercial shipments. Product errors can put us at a competitive disadvantage and can be costly and time-consuming to correct.

A product or professional services liability claim, whether or not successful, could damage our reputation and our business, operating results and financial condition. Our license and service agreements with our customers typically contain provisions designed to limit our exposure to potential product or service liability claims. However, these contract provisions may not preclude all potential claims. Product or professional services liability claims could require us to spend significant time and money in litigation or to pay significant damages.

We Compete with Microsoft while Simultaneously Supporting Microsoft Technologies

We currently compete with Microsoft in the market for data management products while simultaneously maintaining a working relationship with Microsoft. Microsoft has a longer operating history, a larger installed base of customers and substantially greater financial, distribution, marketing and technical resources than Pervasive. As a result, we may not be able to compete effectively with Microsoft now or in the future, and our business, operating results and financial condition may be materially adversely affected.

We expect that Microsoft’s commitment to and presence in the data management products market will substantially increase competitive pressures. We believe that Microsoft will continue to incorporate SQL Server database technology into its operating system software and certain of its server software offerings, possibly at no additional cost to its users. We believe that Microsoft will also continue to enhance its SQL Server database technology and that Microsoft will continue to invest in various sales and marketing programs involving certain of our channel partners.

Further, in December 2000, Microsoft acquired Great Plains Software, a channel partner of Pervasive. This, and any similar transactions may have an adverse effect on our ability to compete effectively.

We believe we must maintain a working relationship with Microsoft to achieve success. Many of our customers use Microsoft-based operating platforms. Thus it is critical to our success that our products be closely integrated with Microsoft technologies. Notwithstanding our historical and current support of Microsoft platforms, Microsoft may in the future promote technologies and standards more directly competitive with or not compatible with our technology.

Index to Financial Statements

We encounter competition for our database products primarily from large, public companies, including Microsoft, Oracle, Sybase, IBM and Progress. In particular, Sybase’s small memory footprint database software product, Adaptive Server Anywhere, and Microsoft’s product, SQL Server, directly compete with our products. In addition, because there are relatively low barriers to entry in the software market, we may encounter additional competition from other established or emerging companies providing database products based on existing, new or open-source technologies.

Open-source software, which is an emerging trend in the software marketplace, may impact our business as interest, demand and use increases in the database segment and poses a challenge to our business model, including recent efforts by proponents of open-source software to convince governments worldwide to mandate the use of open-source software in their purchase and deployments of software products. Firms adopting the open-source software model typically provide customers software produced by loosely associated groups of unpaid programmers and made available for license to end users at nominal cost, and earn revenue on complementary services and products, without having to bear the full costs of research and development for the open-source software. Because the present demand for open-source database software is largely concentrated in major corporations, our database business has not been adversely affected to date. However, it is likely that increased adoption of Linux will drive heightened interest in other more mature software categories such as database and certain business applications. We continue to watch the evolution of open-source software development and distribution, and continue to differentiate our products from competitive products including those based on open-source software. To the extent open-source software products gain increasing market acceptance, sales of our products may decline, we may have to reduce prices we charge for our products, and our revenue and operating margins may decline. Mass adoption of open source databases in the SME market could have a material adverse impact on our database business.

Application service providers (ASPs) may enter our market and could cause a change in revenue models from licensing of client/server and Web-based applications to renting applications. Our competitors may be more successful than we are in adopting these revenue models and capturing related market share.

The market for our integration products is highly competitive and subject to rapidly changing technology. We principally compete against ETL (extract, transform and load) software vendors and data warehousing and application integration software providers. Such competitors include Ascential, Business Objects, Embarcadero, Informatica, and Information Builders. In addition, we compete or may compete against database vendors that currently offer, or may develop, products with functionalities that compete with our solutions. These products typically operate specifically with these competitors’ proprietary databases. Such competitors include IBM, Microsoft and Oracle. Competition also comes in the form of custom code, where potential customers have sufficient internal technical resources to develop solutions in-house without the aid of our products or those of our competitors.

Most of our competitors have longer operating histories, significantly greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources, significantly greater name recognition and a larger installed base of customers. In addition, some competitors have demonstrated a willingness to, or may willingly in the future, incur substantial losses as a result of deeply discounted product offerings or aggressive marketing campaigns. As a result, our competitors may be able to respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements, or to devote greater resources to the development, promotion and sale of competitive products, than we can. There is also a substantial risk that changes in licensing models or announcements of competing products by competitors such as Microsoft, Oracle, Sybase, IBM, Progress, Ascential, Business Objects, Embarcadero, Informatica, Information Builders or others could result in the cancellation of customer orders in anticipation of the introduction of such new licensing models or products. In addition, current and potential competitors have established or may establish cooperative relationships among themselves or with third parties to increase the ability of their products to address customer needs which may limit our ability to sell our products through particular partners. Accordingly, new competitors or alliances among, or consolidations of, current and new

Index to Financial Statements

competitors may emerge and rapidly gain significant market share in our current or anticipated markets. We also expect that competition will increase as a result of software industry consolidation. Increased competition is likely to result in price reductions, fewer customer orders, reduced margins and loss of market share, any of which could materially adversely affect our business. We cannot be certain we will be able to compete successfully against current and future competitors or that the competitive pressures we face will not materially adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

We Are Susceptible to a Shift in the Market for Client/Server Applications Toward Web-Based Applications

We have derived substantially all of our historical database product revenues from the use of our products in client/server applications. We expect to rely on continued market demand for client/server applications indefinitely. However, we believe market demand may shift from client/server applications to Web-based applications. If so, this shift could occur before our product line has achieved market acceptance for use in Web-based applications. In addition, we cannot be certain that our existing client/server developers will migrate to Web-based applications and continue to use our products or that other developers of Web-based applications would select our data management products. Further, this shift could result in a change in revenue models from licensing of client/server and Web-based applications to renting of applications from application service providers. A decrease in client/server application sales coupled with an inability to derive revenues from the Web-based application market could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

We anticipate that for the foreseeable future we will derive a significant portion of our revenues from sources outside North America. In the year ended June 30, 2004, we derived 35% of our revenues outside North America. Our international operations are generally subject to a number of risks. These risks include:

We may expand or modify our operations internationally. Despite our efforts, we may not be able to expand or modify our operations internationally in a timely and cost-effective manner. Such an outcome would limit or eliminate any sales growth internationally, which in turn would materially adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition. Even if we successfully expand or modify our international operations, we may be unable to maintain or increase international market demand for our products.

We expect our international operations will continue to place financial and administrative demands on us, including operational complexity associated with international facilities, administrative burdens associated with

Index to Financial Statements

managing relationships with foreign partners, and treasury functions to manage foreign currency risks and collections. In particular, we have begun to develop products in our new Bangalore, India facility. In order to capitalize on the economic opportunity afforded by developing products in this facility, we must successfully execute new business processes and retain key technical personnel in Austin and India. It is also likely that the company will run parallel processes in many areas of its technical operations in order to assure high quality development and a high standard of customer care. While the long term economic impact created by the India operation is expected to be favorable, these parallel processes would increase our costs in the short term.

We Use Third-Party Service Providers in India and If We Are Unable to Use Such Providers Our Business Could Be Temporarily Adversely Affected

We are actively supplementing the capabilities of our organization by contracting with third-party service providers located in India. As other software companies have done and are continuing to do, we may continue to allocate more development and IT resources to Indian third parties, and we may expand our own operational capabilities in India, with the expectation of achieving significant efficiencies, including reducing operational costs and permitting an around-the-clock development cycle. To date, the dispute between India and Pakistan involving the Kashmir region and the incidents of terrorism in India have not adversely affected our operations in India. Should we be unable to conduct operations in India in the future, we believe that our business could be temporarily adversely affected.

Fluctuations in the Relative Value of Foreign Currencies Can Affect Our Business

To date, the majority of our transactions have been denominated in U.S. dollars. The majority of our international operating expenses and substantially all of our sales in Japan have been denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Therefore, our operating results may be adversely affected by changes in the value of the U.S. dollar. Certain of our international sales are denominated in U.S. dollars, especially in Europe. Any strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the currencies of countries where we sell products denominated in U.S. dollars will increase the relative cost of our products and could negatively impact our sales in those countries. To the extent our international operations expand or are modified, our exposure to exchange rate fluctuations may increase. We have, on occasion, entered into limited hedging transactions to mitigate our exposure to currency fluctuations. Despite these hedging transactions, exchange rate fluctuations have caused, and will continue to cause, currency transaction gains and losses. Although these transactions have not resulted in material gains and losses to date, similar transactions could have a damaging effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition in future periods.

Our success depends in large part on our ability to attract, motivate and retain highly skilled employees on a timely basis, particularly executive management, sales and marketing personnel, software engineers and other senior personnel. Our efforts to attract and retain highly skilled employees could be harmed by our past or any future workforce reductions. Our failure to attract and retain the highly trained technical personnel who are essential to our product development, marketing, service and support teams may limit the rate at which we can generate revenue and develop new products or product enhancements. This could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

Our Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws contain certain provisions that may have the effect of discouraging, delaying or preventing a change in control or unsolicited acquisition proposals that a stockholder might consider favorable. It includes provisions to authorize the issuance of “blank check” preferred stock; establish advance notice requirements for stockholder nominations for elections to the Board of Directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon at stockholders’ meetings; eliminate the ability of stockholders to act by

Index to Financial Statements

written consent; require super-majority voting to approve certain amendments to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation; limit the persons who may call special meetings of stockholders; and provide for a Board of Directors with staggered, three-year terms. In addition, certain provisions of Delaware law and 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (the “1997 Plan”) may also have the effect of discouraging, delaying or preventing a change in control or unsolicited acquisition proposals.

Further, in October 2000, our Board of Directors approved the adoption of a shareholder rights plan whereby one preferred share purchase right was distributed for each outstanding share of our common stock. The rights are designed to assure that all of our stockholders receive fair and equal treatment in the event of any proposed takeover and to guard against partial tender offers, open market accumulations and other tactics designed to gain control without paying all stockholders a fair price. The rights were not being distributed in response to any specific effort to acquire us.

The rights become exercisable if a person or group hereafter acquires 15% or more of our common stock or announces a tender offer for 15% or more of our common stock. Such events, or if we are acquired in a merger or other business combination transaction after a person acquires 15% or more of our common stock, would entitle the right holder to purchase, at an exercise price of $18.00, a number of shares of common stock having a market value at that time of twice the right’s exercise price. Rights held by the acquiring person would become void. The Board of Directors can choose to redeem the rights at one cent per right at any time before an acquiring person hereafter acquires 15% or more of the outstanding common stock. The Rights Plan may have the effect of discouraging, delaying or preventing a change in control or unsolicited acquisition proposals.

We May Elect to Raise Additional Capital Which Might Not Be Available or Which, if Available, May Be on Terms That Are Not Favorable to Us

We may elect to raise additional funds, and we cannot be certain that we will be able to obtain additional financing on favorable terms, if at all. If we issue equity securities, the ownership percentage of our stockholders would be reduced, and the new equity securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of existing holders of our common stock. If we borrow money, we may incur significant interest charges, which could harm our profitability. Holders of debt would also have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of existing holders of our common stock. If we cannot raise funds on acceptable terms, we may not be able to develop or enhance our products, take advantage of future opportunities or respond to competitive pressures or unanticipated requirements, which could seriously harm our business, operating results and financial condition.

The Price of Our Stock Has Been Volatile and Could Continue to Fluctuate Substantially

Our common stock is traded in the NASDAQ National Market. The market price of our common stock has been volatile and could fluctuate substantially based on a variety of factors outside of our control, in addition to our financial performance. Furthermore, stock prices for many companies, including our own, fluctuate widely for reasons that may be unrelated to operating results.

Index to Financial Statements

Some of the statements in the “Letter to Stockholders” in the Annual Report and this Report on Form 10-K under “Business,” “Risk Factors That May Affect Future Results,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and elsewhere in this Report constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements include statements regarding the Company’s expectations, beliefs, hopes, intentions or strategies regarding the future. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our or our industry’s actual results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among other things, those listed under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Report on Form 10-K.

In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” or “continue” or the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Moreover, neither we nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of such statements. We are under no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this Report to conform such statements to actual results.

The Company did not submit any matters to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of fiscal year ended June 30, 2004.

Index to Financial Statements

The executive officers of the Company, and their ages as of September 13, 2004, and biographical summaries are as follows:

David Sikora has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer since July 2002 and as a director since February 2002. Prior to joining Pervasive, Mr. Sikora served as Chairman and CEO of Question Technologies, Inc., an enterprise software company that was a spin-off of Ventix Systems, Inc., from January 2000 to September 2002, and as President, CEO and director of Ventix Systems, Inc., an enterprise software company, from July 1998 to January 2000. Prior to joining Ventix, Mr. Sikora served as President and CEO of Houston-based ForeFront Group, Inc., an e-learning software company. Mr. Sikora currently serves as a director of TippingPoint Technologies, Inc. and Motive, Inc. Mr. Sikora received his B.S. in Electrical Engineering Technology from the University of Houston and an M.B.A. from Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration.

John E. Farr has served as our Chief Financial Officer since July 2001. Previously, Mr. Farr served as our Vice President, Finance, from October 1998 to July 2001, as Director of Finance from April 1997 to October 1998 and as Controller from November 1994 to April 1997. Prior to joining Pervasive, Mr. Farr served as an auditor and in audit management for KPMG LLP, an international accounting firm from 1982 to 1994. Mr. Farr received a B.B.A. in Accounting from Southwestern University.

Michael Hoskins has served as our Chief Technology Officer since June 2004 and as General Manager of the IPD Products Division from December 2003 to June 2004. Mr. Hoskins has also served as a director since December 2003. Prior to joining Pervasive, Mr. Hoskins served as President and director of Data Junction Corporation for 15 years. Mr. Hoskins joined Data Junction in 1988 as Vice President of Sales. Mr. Hoskins graduated from the Bowling Green State University with a bachelor of business administration and a major in finance.

Jeffrey S. Seiden has served as our Vice President, Corporate Development, since April 2002. Before joining Pervasive, Mr. Seiden served as Vice President of Market Development for Question Technologies, Inc., an enterprise software company. Mr. Seiden was the Founder, President and CEO of nuLogic Inc., an automation software company, for 10 years before its acquisition by National Instruments, Inc. in 1997, and has held executive and leadership positions at Austin Ventures AVLabs, Cambridge Robotic Systems, Inspex, Inc., and LTX Corporation. Mr. Seiden has served as a director or technology board member for several private companies, and continues to advise and mentor early stage entrepreneurs. Mr. Seiden earned his B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Syracuse University.

Suaad H. Sait has served as our Vice President and General Manager, Products and Markets since April 2004. Previously, Mr. Sait served as General Manager, Database Products Division from December 2003 to March 2004 and as Vice President, Marketing from June 2002 to November 2003. Prior to joining Pervasive, Mr. Sait served as Chief Marketing Officer and COO of Liaison Technology, a catalog content management infrastructure software company, as Vice President of e-Business Marketing at Motive Communications, Inc., a

Index to Financial Statements

technical support software company, and as Vice President of Marketing and general manager of the Extended Enterprise business unit at Ventix Systems, Inc., an enterprise software company. Mr. Sait has also held leadership positions at DAZEL Corporation, InConcert Software and Xerox Corporation. Mr. Sait earned his B.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the State University of New York at Buffalo and his M.B.A. from the William E. Simon Graduate School of Business at the University of Rochester.

Chip G. Harmon has served as our Vice President, North American Sales, since July 2002. From 1999 to July 2002, Mr. Harmon served as Vice President of Sales for North America for Hyperion, a business intelligence/business performance management company. Mr. Harmon has served in numerous sales management roles, including positions with Metaphor Computer Systems, Ingres Corporation, Cognos Corporation and Tymshare, Inc. Mr. Harmon received his B.B.A. in Marketing from Stephen F. Austin University.

Gilbert Van Cutsem has served as our Vice President, EMEAA Sales and Marketing, since April 2000. Mr. Van Cutsem has served Pervasive in various sales and marketing roles since September 1995. Prior to joining Pervasive, Mr. Van Cutsem was Channel and Product Marketing Manager at Novell Benelux and Director of Marketing at AT&T’s EMEA headquarters. Mr. Van Cutsem holds degrees in Computer Science (Na.Ra.Fi. Brussels) and Business Administration (V.E.H. Brussels) and earned his master’s degree in Applied Economics from FUCAM (Mons, Belgium).

Curtis Hill has served as our Vice President, Engineering since June 2004. Prior to joining Pervasive, Mr. Hill served as vice president of engineering at BMC Software for the Enterprise Data Management product group, where he led a 550 person engineering team spanning the United States, the United Kingdom and India. Over the last 10 years he has managed large product development organizations for Boole & Babbage, Chain Bridge Systems and Landmark Systems. Mr. Hill earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Theoretical Mathematics from Auburn University in Auburn Alabama.

Michele B. Thompson has served as our Vice President, Business Operations and Legal Affairs since May 2002. Previously, Ms. Thompson served as Director of Legal Affairs for Pervasive from May 1999 to May 2002. Prior to joining Pervasive, Ms. Thompson practiced law in the Austin office of a large Dallas-based law firm. Prior to attending law school, Ms. Thompson was a Vice President at a financial institution holding company based in Dallas. Ms. Thompson received her B.B.A. in Finance from the University of Texas at Austin and her J.D. degree from the University of Texas School of Law.

Index to Financial Statements

The common stock of the Company is traded in the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol PVSW. The Company completed its initial public offering and commenced trading on September 26, 1997. The following tables set forth the high and low closing sales prices of the Company’s common stock for each quarterly period during the three years ended June 30, 2004.

As of August 31, 2004, there were approximately 270 stockholders of record (which number does not include the number of stockholders whose shares are held by a brokerage house or clearing agency, but does include such brokerage house or clearing agency as one record holder).

The Company has never paid a cash dividend on its common stock and does not intend to pay cash dividends on its common stock in the foreseeable future.

Index to Financial Statements

The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto and with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” which are included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. The consolidated statements of operations data for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2002, 2003 and 2004 and the consolidated balance sheet data at June 30, 2003 and 2004 are derived from audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. The consolidated statements of operations data for the periods ended June 30, 2000 and 2001 and the consolidated balance sheet data at June 30, 2000, 2001 and 2002 are derived from audited consolidated financial statements not included herein.

Index to Financial Statements

This Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements. Please see the “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” elsewhere in this Report on Form 10-K.

On December 4, 2003 we completed the acquisition of Data Junction Corporation (“Data Junction”). The acquisition was made pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of August 8, 2003, by and among us, Ramal Acquisition Corp., our wholly owned Delaware subsidiary and Data Junction. The aggregate cash plus share purchase price for all of the common stock of Data Junction was approximately $46.6 million, net of cash acquired from Data Junction (See Note 8 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements). The results of operations of Data Junction from December 4, 2003 to June 30, 2004, or the Stub Period, are included in our consolidated results of operations.

The acquisition of Data Junction brought important data integration and transformation technologies and products, which are highly complementary to our existing data management products, expertise and customer

Index to Financial Statements

base. The acquisition significantly advances our strategy to be the global value leader in data infrastructure software, enabling more than 25,000 businesses, such as major corporations, systems integrators and software vendors, to capitalize on their data investments. Winner of more than 20 major industry awards, Data Junction is a market leader in innovative integration technology, helping customers quickly and cost-effectively connect disparate data sources. Primary integration products include a comprehensive set of visual design tools for rapidly building and testing data integration processes that work with hundreds of data formats and applications. This enables design with total control over all aspects of the integration project—from creating integration maps to managing complex, event-driven flow of inter-application messages and EDI processes. Data Junction virtually created the category known as ETL (extract, transform and load) in 1986 with Data Junction v1.0, one of the world’s first hub-and-spoke approaches to data conversion and translation, and today is charting new ground in the development of business and application integration technologies.

In July 2001, we formed a new business venture with AG-TECH Corporation, a company developing, selling and importing packaged software, to sell and support our products in Japan. AG-TECH has been engaged in the sales and support of Btrieve (predecessor to Pervasive.SQL) and Pervasive.SQL products since 1986. In conjunction with the joint venture, AG-TECH launched a new operating division staffed with specialists experienced in selling and supporting Pervasive.SQL to assume responsibility for OEM sales, packaged software sales, technical support and localization and translation of our products into Japanese. The new business venture has resulted in improved profitability on sales in Japan as the arrangement allowed us to significantly reduce our costs in Japan. In connection with the new business venture, we obtained a less than 20% ownership interest in AG-TECH and the ability to elect one director to the AG-TECH Board of Directors. Pervasive’s revenues from Japan were $4.5 million, $5.3 million and $6.1 million for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively. In June 2004, we renewed portions of our distribution agreement with AG-TECH for an additional three-year period ending June 30, 2007.

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Revenue Recognition—We license our software through OEM license agreements with software developers, or ISVs, and through shrink-wrap software licenses, sold through ISVs, value-added resellers, or VARs, systems integrators and distributors, or direct to end users. Revenues are generally recognized when persuasive evidence of an agreement exists, delivery of the product has occurred, no significant Company obligations with regard to implementation remain, the fee is fixed or determinable and collectibility is probable. Revenues related to OEM license agreements involving nonrefundable fixed minimum license fees are generally recognized upon delivery of the product master or first copy if no significant vendor obligations remain. Per copy royalties related to OEM license agreements in excess of a fixed minimum amount are recognized as revenue when such amounts are reported to us. Revenue from post contract support and the right to receive unspecified upgrades is recognized

Index to Financial Statements

ratably over the contract term. We generally provide telephone support to customers and end users in the 30 days immediately following the sale at no additional charge and at a minimal cost per call. We accrue the cost of providing this support. Revenue from consulting services and training is recognized when the related services are performed. We enter into agreements with certain distributors that provide for certain stock rotation and price protection rights. These rights allow the distributor to return products in a non-cash exchange for other products or for credits against future purchases. Revenue from shipping and handling is recognized at the shipping date. Shipping and handling costs are included in costs of product license revenues in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Sales Returns and Bad Debt Reserves—We reserve for the cost of estimated sales returns, stock rotation and price protection rights as well as uncollectible accounts based on experience.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets—We assess whether goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles are impaired on an annual basis. Upon determining the existence of goodwill and/or indefinite-lived intangibles impairment, we measure that impairment based on the amount by which the book value of goodwill and/or indefinite-lived intangibles exceeds its fair value. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined by deducting the fair value of a reporting unit’s identifiable assets and liabilities from the fair value of the reporting unit as a whole, as if that reporting unit had just been acquired and the purchase price were being initially allocated. Additional impairment assessments may be performed on an interim basis if we encounter events or changes in circumstance that would indicate that, more likely than not, the book value of goodwill and/or indefinite-lived intangibles has been impaired.

The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the percentage of revenues represented by certain lines in our consolidated statements of operations.

Index to Financial Statements

We generated revenues from continuing operations of $37.2 million, $39.2 million and $49.6 million for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively, which represents an increase of 5% from fiscal 2002 to 2003, and an increase of 27% from fiscal 2003 to 2004. The increase in revenue from continuing operations in fiscal year 2003 can be attributed to upgrades to our latest release of Pervasive.SQL, V8, released in December 2002, and improved sales and marketing execution following management changes made at the beginning of fiscal 2003. The increase in revenue in fiscal 2004 is primarily attributable to license and service revenues from Data Junction related products and services during the Stub Period.

Our product license revenues were $34.0 million, $35.4 million and $41.0 million for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively, which represents an increase of 4% from fiscal 2002 to 2003, and an increase of 16% from fiscal 2003 to 2004. The increase in product license revenue from fiscal 2003 to fiscal 2004 was primarily due to the inclusion of license revenue from Data Junction related products during the Stub Period.

Licenses of our software operating on Windows NT or other Microsoft operating systems continue to represent approximately 80% to 90% of our database product license revenues. We expect that the percentages of our revenues attributable to licenses of our software operating on particular platforms will continue to change from time to time. We cannot be certain that our revenues attributable to licenses of our software operating on Windows NT, or any other operating system platform, will grow in the future.

Our service and other revenues were $3.2 million, $3.8 million and $8.6 million for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively, which represents an increase of 20% from fiscal 2002 to 2003, and an increase of 125% from fiscal 2003 to 2004. The increase in service and other revenues from fiscal 2003 to fiscal 2004 was primarily due to the inclusion of service and other revenue from Data Junction services during the Stub Period.

International revenues, consisting of all revenues from continuing operations from customers located outside of North America, were $14.9 million, $16.3 million and $17.6 million in fiscal 2002, 2003 and 2004, representing 40%, 42% and 35% of total revenues, respectively. We attribute the increase in international revenue in fiscal year 2003 to improved sales and marketing execution following management changes made at the beginning of fiscal year 2003. We attribute the increase in international revenue in fiscal year 2004 primarily to increased revenue in Japan and to the inclusion of revenue from Data Junction related products and services during the Stub Period. International revenues as a percentage of total revenues in 2004 decreased from prior year due to inclusion of Data Junction revenues during the Stub Period, as Data Junction revenues are more predominantly from North America. We expect that international revenues will continue to account for a significant portion of our revenues in the future.

Index to Financial Statements

Cost of Product License Revenues. Cost of product license revenues consists primarily of the cost to manufacture and fulfill orders for our shrink-wrap software products, payment of license fees for third-party technologies embedded in our products and amortization of purchased technology. Cost of product license revenues for continuing operations was $1.0 million, $1.0 million and $1.7 million in fiscal 2002, 2003 and 2004, representing 3% of total revenues from continuing operations for all three fiscal years. Cost of product license revenue increased in dollar amount in fiscal 2004 as compared to fiscal 2002 and 2003 principally as the result of amortization related to the $6.3 million value assigned to developed technology acquired through the Data Junction acquisition. The Data Junction acquisition occurred in the second quarter of fiscal 2004, and accordingly, we began to recognize amortization expense in the Stub Period. We anticipate that cost of product license revenue will increase in fiscal year 2005 primarily due to a full year of amortization of purchased technology.

Cost of Service and Other Revenues. Cost of service and other revenues consists primarily of the cost to provide technical support, primarily telephone support, which is typically provided within 30 days of purchase and the costs to deliver professional services and training services to others. Cost of service and other revenues for continuing operations was $5.5 million, $4.9 million and $5.5 million in fiscal 2002, 2003 and 2004, representing 15%, 12% and 11% of total revenues from continuing operations, respectively. Cost of service and other revenue decreased in dollar amount in fiscal 2003 as compared to fiscal 2002 primarily as a result of a reduction in costs associated with consulting personnel. Cost of service and other revenues increased in dollar amount in fiscal 2004 as compared to fiscal 2003 primarily as a result of an increase in technical support and consulting personnel and related operating costs associated with the Data Junction operations subsequent to the December 4, 2003 acquisition date. We anticipate that cost of service and other revenues will increase in fiscal year 2005 primarily due to a full year of combined service and consulting activities.

Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries, commissions and bonuses earned by sales and marketing personnel, foreign sales office expenses, travel and entertainment, marketing programs and promotional expenses. Sales and marketing expenses related to continuing operations were $12.3 million, $13.7 million and $18.3 million in fiscal 2002, 2003 and 2004, representing 33%, 35% and 37% of total revenues from continuing operations, respectively. Sales and marketing expenses increased in dollar amount and as a percentage of revenue in fiscal 2003 primarily due to increased costs associated with sales and marketing personnel and costs associated with marketing programs and promotional expenses related to the launch of the latest release of Pervasive.SQL, V8, during the second quarter of fiscal 2003. The increase in sales and marketing expenses in fiscal 2004 is due primarily to Stub Period operating costs associated with the Data Junction operations subsequent to the acquisition date. We expect sales and marketing expenses will increase in fiscal 2005 primarily due to a full year of combined sales and marketing activities as we continue to increase relative investments in sales and marketing personnel and marketing programs related to the data integration product line acquired in the Data Junction acquisition.

Research and Development. Research and development expenses consist primarily of personnel and related costs. Research and development expenses related to continuing operations were $7.1 million, $8.0 million and $10.0 million in fiscal 2002, 2003 and 2004, representing 19%, 21% and 20% of total revenues from continuing operations, respectively. Research and development costs increased in dollar amount and as a percentage of revenue in fiscal 2003 primarily due to increased costs associated with research and development personnel and outsourced development contracts. Research and development expenses increased in dollar amount in fiscal year 2004 primarily as a result of costs relating to Data Junction operations during the Stub Period. We anticipate that research and development expenses in fiscal year 2005 will increase from costs incurred during fiscal year 2004, due to a full year of combined research and development activities.

General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel salaries and other costs of our finance, human resources and administrative departments. General and administrative expenses related to continuing operations were $5.4 million, $4.9 million and $5.2 million in fiscal 2002, 2003

Index to Financial Statements

and 2004, representing 14%, 12% and 11% of total revenues from continuing operations, respectively. General and administrative expenses decreased in dollar amount and as a percentage of revenue in fiscal 2003 primarily due to reductions in general and administrative personnel, bad debt expense and fees paid to professional service providers. General and administrative expenses increased in dollar amount in fiscal year 2004 primarily as a result of costs relating to Data Junction operations during the Stub Period. We believe our general and administrative expenses will decrease in dollar amount in fiscal year 2005 as we leverage the combined operations with Data Junction and given the non-recurring effect of the charge described in the following paragraph.

In the second quarter of fiscal 2004, we wrote-off related party notes receivable totaling approximately $0.3 million, included in general and administrative expenses. These notes receivable, dated July 2001 and March 2002, were written off in accordance with the original terms of the note agreements with our former Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer Ron Harris. The terms of the original notes required the forgiveness of the balance of the notes in the event Mr. Harris’ service to the Company ended under certain conditions. With the expiration and non-renewal of Mr. Harris’ term as a Director of the Company at the 2003 Annual Shareholders Meeting on December 3, 2003, and with the absence of any other agreement calling for the continued service of Mr. Harris to the Company, the conditions for forgiveness of the notes were met.

Write-off of Acquired In-Process Research and Development. In connection with the Data Junction acquisition in December 2003, we recorded a charge of $1.1 million, or approximately 2% of the total purchase price, for IPRD. The value allocated to the projects identified as IPRD was charged to operations during the three months ended December 31, 2003.

At the acquisition date, Data Junction’s in-process project was Release 9.0 of the Data Junction integration software product. At the date of the acquisition, IPRD was approximately 70% complete, based upon costs expended to date and estimated costs to complete the project. Release 9.0 will include significant new code that will result in the creation of an improved architecture designed to solve the high performance integration needs of larger companies and will be much better suited to tackle more complex data and application integration projects.

As of the Data Junction acquisition date, this technology had not yet reached technological feasibility and had no alternative uses. The technological feasibility of an in-process product is established when the enterprise has completed all planning, designing, coding and testing activities necessary to establish that the product can be produced to meet its design specifications. The value of IPRD was determined using an income approach. This approach takes into consideration earnings remaining after deducting from cash flows related to the in-process technology the market rates of return on contributory assets, including assembled workforce, customer accounts and existing technology. The cash flows are then discounted to present value at an appropriate rate. Discount rates are determined by an analysis of the risks associated with each of the identified intangible assets. Given the riskier nature of the cash flows related to the IPRD, a higher discount was warranted, and is based on the cost of equity plus 1000 basis points. The resulting cash flows attributable to the IPRD were discounted at a discount rate of 25.4%. The resulting net cash flows to which this discount rate was applied are based on management’s estimates of revenues, operating expenses, and income taxes from such acquired technology. It is anticipated that, barring unforeseen circumstances, substantially all of the features of Release 9.0 of the Data Junction integration software project are expected to be completed in fiscal year 2005. Some of the risks and uncertainties inherent in the estimated costs to complete the project and the attainment of completion, include, but are not limited to, the difficulty of predicting the duration of product development and the risks that changes in the product requirements will result in unexpected redesign activity.

Provision for Income Taxes. Provision for income taxes related to continuing operations was approximately $0.6 million, $0.6 million and $0.8 million in fiscal 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively. The provision for income taxes consists primarily of income taxes on our foreign operations. Income from U.S. operations has been offset by net operating losses carried forward from previous years.

Index to Financial Statements

Based on a number of factors, we believe that it is more likely than not, that a substantial amount of our deferred tax assets may not be realized. Accordingly, we have recorded a valuation allowance equal to the net deferred tax asset due to uncertainties regarding the realization of deferred tax assets based on the lack of significant earnings history and risks associated with business combinations. We expect to continue to incur foreign taxes associated with our international operations while our domestic income taxes will remain minimal as we utilize substantial net operating losses and various tax credits carried forward from previous years. See Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of our provision for income taxes.

Effect of Adoption of New Accounting Principle. We adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, effective July 1, 2001. Statement 142 discontinues the amortization of goodwill and requires future periodic testing of goodwill for impairment. In addition, Statement 142 requires reassessment of the useful lives of previously recognized intangible assets. With the adoption of Statement 142, we ceased amortization of goodwill as of July 1, 2001. The adoption will result in a decrease in operating expense related to goodwill amortization of approximately $104,000 per year. Additionally, we completed a goodwill impairment test as allowed by Statement 142 during the first quarter of fiscal 2002, resulting in an impairment charge of approximately $676,000, which is recorded as a cumulative change in accounting principle.

Gain from Discontinued Operations. Gain from discontinued operations in fiscal 2003 was $0.2 million and is the result of a reduction in the future liabilities of the discontinued operations following the partial termination of an office lease on favorable economic terms.

Index to Financial Statements

The following table sets forth selected unaudited quarterly information for our last eight fiscal quarters. This information has been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this Report, and we believe all necessary adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) have been included in the amounts stated below. We also believe this information presents fairly the results of such periods when read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes.

Index to Financial Statements

Our operating results have varied significantly from quarter to quarter in the past and may continue to vary significantly from quarter to quarter in the future due to a variety of factors. Such fluctuations may result in volatility in the price of our common stock. We establish our expenditure levels based on expectations as to future revenue, and, if revenue levels are below expectations, expenses can be disproportionately high. As a result, a drop in near term demand for our products could significantly affect both revenues and profits in any quarter. In the future, our operating results may fluctuate for this reason or as a result of a number of other factors, including increased expenses, timing of product releases, increased competition, variations in the mix of sales, announcements of new products by us or our competitors and capital spending patterns of our customers. As a result of these factors, there can be no assurance we will be able to maintain profitability on a quarterly basis. See “Risk Factors That May Affect Future Results.”

Cash provided by continuing operations was $9.9 million, $9.2 million and $9.1 million for fiscal 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively. Cash provided by continuing operations decreased from fiscal 2002 to 2003 despite an increase in income from continuing operations in fiscal 2003, primarily due to an increase in current assets, partially offset by an increase in deferred rent and lease related accruals. Cash provided by continuing operations decreased slightly from fiscal 2003 to 2004 despite an increase in income from continuing operations in fiscal 2004, primarily due to an increase in current assets, partially offset by an increase in deferred revenue.

We used $16.6 million, net of $6.5 million of cash held by Data Junction at the time of closing of the transaction, and issued 5 million shares of Pervasive common stock to acquire the outstanding shares of Data Junction, including certain acquisition-related costs.

During fiscal 2002, we invested a net amount of $5.5 million in marketable securities. During fiscal 2003, we received net proceeds of $1.7 million from the sale or maturity of marketable securities. During fiscal 2004, we received net proceeds of $0.4 million from the sale or maturity of marketable securities. In addition, we

Index to Financial Statements

purchased property and equipment totaling approximately $0.4 million, $0.6 million and $1.0 million in fiscal 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively. This property consisted primarily of computer hardware and software for general upgrade requirements in fiscal 2002, 2003 and 2004 as well as an upgrade to the front office system in 2004. We expect that our capital expenditures may increase in the next fiscal year as compared to fiscal 2004 as a result of specific capital projects anticipated to upgrade certain front and back office systems.

We have a stock repurchase plan in place whereby we may repurchase shares of our common stock up to a total of $5.0 million through July 21, 2003. As of June 30, 2004, we had repurchased approximately 963,000 shares of Pervasive common stock at an aggregate cost of approximately $2.4 million. In July 2003, we announced the authorization of a new $5.0 million stock repurchase plan which became effective upon expiration of the previous plan on July 21, 2003. Depending on market conditions and other factors, such purchases may be commenced or suspended at any time without prior notice.

We are in the process of negotiating with our present landlord, as well as with other prospective landlords, regarding future office facilities for our Austin office headquarters. Our present lease agreement allows for an early cancellation of the lease effective November 1, 2005, in exchange for a cancellation fee of $2.3M, paid in two installments in November 2004 and November 2005, assuming we provide notice to our landlord by November 1, 2004, of our intent to cancel. We have previously accrued for the entire cost of the cancellation fee in our balance sheet and therefore, such a cancellation payment would not be detrimental to our income statement. Various scenarios are being discussed with various parties, and at least one scenario includes the possibility of canceling the original lease and paying the cancellation fee prior to the dates referred to above, potentially as early as the quarter ending September 30, 2004.

On June 30, 2004, we had $30.7 million in working capital including $34.6 million in cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities.

The following table summarizes our operating lease obligations at June 30, 2004, and the effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods:

The majority of our operations are based in the United States and, accordingly, the majority of our transactions are denominated in U.S. dollars. However, we do have foreign-based operations where transactions are denominated in foreign currencies and are subject to market risk with respect to fluctuations in the relative value of currencies. Currently, we have operations in Japan, Belgium, Germany, France, England, Italy, Poland and India and conduct transactions in the local currency of each location. If the U.S. dollar to Japanese yen rate had remained unchanged throughout fiscal 2002, the result would have been an increase in revenue and operating income of approximately $0.1 million. If the U.S. dollar to Japanese yen rate had remained unchanged throughout fiscal 2003, the result would have been an increase in revenue and operating income of approximately $20,000. If the U.S. dollar to Japanese yen rate had remained unchanged throughout fiscal 2004, the result would have been a decrease in revenue and operating income of approximately $0.5 million. If the U.S. dollar to euro

Index to Financial Statements

rate had remained unchanged throughout fiscal 2002, the result would have been an increase in operating income of approximately $0.2 million. If the U.S. dollar to euro rate had remained unchanged throughout fiscal 2003, the result would have been an increase in operating income of approximately $0.2 million. If the U.S. dollar to euro rate had remained unchanged throughout fiscal 2004, the result would have been an increase in operating income of approximately $0.2 million. The impact of fluctuations in the relative value of all other currencies for fiscal 2002, 2003 and 2004 was not material.

We monitor our foreign currency exposure and, from time to time, will attempt to reduce exposure through hedging. Gains and losses on foreign currency hedging were not material to the consolidated financial statements for fiscal years ended June 30, 2002, 2003 and 2004 as such hedging activities were minimal.

We are subject to interest rate risk on our cash and marketable securities investments; however, this risk is limited as our investment policy requires us to invest in short-term securities and maintain an average maturity of one year or less.

The financial statements and supplementary data required by this Item 8 are listed in Item 15(a)(1) and begin at page F-1 of this Report.

Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, with the participation of our management, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of our fiscal year. Based upon this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective, in all material respects, to ensure that information required to be disclosed in Pervasive’s Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported in a timely manner.

Index to Financial Statements

The information regarding directors is incorporated herein by reference from the section entitled “Election of Directors” of the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement (the “Proxy Statement”) to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, for the registrants’ Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on November 2, 2004. The Proxy Statement is anticipated to be filed within 120 days after the end of the registrant’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2004. For information regarding executive officers of the Company, see the Information appearing under the caption “Executive Officers of the Registrant” in Part I, Item 4a of this Report on Form 10-K.

Information regarding executive compensation is incorporated herein by reference from the section entitled “Executive Compensation and Related Information” of the Proxy Statement.

Information regarding security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is incorporated herein by reference from the section entitled “Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” of the Proxy Statement.

Information regarding certain relationships and related transactions is incorporated herein by reference from the section entitled “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” of the Proxy Statement.

Information concerning principal accountant fees and services appears in the Proxy Statement under the heading “Fees Billed by Ernst & Young LLP” and is incorporated herein by reference.

Index to Financial Statements

The following consolidated financial statements of the Company are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K as follows:

Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts is filed on page S-1 of this Report on Form 10-K.

All other schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable, not required under the instructions, or the information requested is set forth in the consolidated financial statements or related notes thereto.

(b) The company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K under Item 7, including the Company’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations and Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, on April 21, 2004.

Index to Financial Statements

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


PERVASIVE SOFTWARE INC. (Registrant)

By:		/s/ DAVID SIKORA
		David Sikora President and Chief Executive Officer

September 13, 2004 Date

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Index to Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Pervasive Software Inc. (the “Company”) as of June 30, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2004. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a) (2). These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Pervasive Software Inc. at June 30, 2004 and 2003, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2004, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

Index to Financial Statements

Pervasive Software Inc. (the “Company”) is a global value leader in data infrastructure software. Thousands of businesses worldwide rely on the Company’s award winning solutions to help manage, integrate, analyze and secure their critical data. The Company’s data management and integration product lines are designed specifically for small to mid-sized businesses and departments of large enterprises where high performance, flexibility, rapid deployment and low total cost of ownership (“TCO”) are paramount. In addition, significant portions of the Company’s product line are embeddable into commercial applications for sale predominantly to small to mid-size enterprises (“SMEs”) through a well-developed channel of independent software vendors (“ISVs”), value-added resellers (“VARs”) and systems integrators.

The Company develops, markets, sells and supports its offerings worldwide through its principal office in Austin, Texas and through international offices in Brussels, Frankfurt, Paris, London, Milan, Warsaw and Bangalore and a joint venture in Japan. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its majority-owned subsidiaries. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The Company licenses its software through original equipment manufacturer (OEM) license agreements with software developers, or ISVs and through shrink-wrap software licenses, sold through ISVs, VARs, systems integrators and distributors, or direct to end users. Revenues are generally recognized when persuasive evidence of an agreement exists, delivery of the product has occurred, no significant Company obligations with regard to implementation remain, the fee is fixed or determinable and collectibility is probable. Revenues related to OEM license agreements involving nonrefundable fixed minimum license fees are recognized upon delivery of the product master or first copy if no significant vendor obligations remain. Per copy royalties related to OEM license agreements in excess of a fixed minimum amount are recognized as revenue when such amounts are reported to the Company. Revenue from post contract support and the right to receive unspecified upgrades is recognized ratably over the contract term. The Company generally provides telephone support to customers and end users in the 30 days immediately following the sale at no additional charge and at a minimal cost per call. The Company accrues the cost of providing this support. Revenue from consulting services and training is recognized when the related services are performed. The Company enters into agreements with certain distributors that provide for certain stock rotation and price protection rights. These rights allow the distributor to return products in a non-cash exchange for other products or for credits against future purchases. The Company reserves for the cost of estimated sales returns, stock rotation and price protection rights as well as uncollectible accounts based on experience. Revenue from shipping and handling is recognized at the shipping date. Shipping and handling costs are included in Costs of product licenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Software development costs incurred by the Company in connection with its long-term development projects are accounted for in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 86, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased or Otherwise Marketed (“Statement 86”). The Company has not capitalized any internal costs through June 30, 2004 related to its software development activities. In April 2003, the Company purchased a database transaction intelligence technology and capitalized the cost in accordance with Statement 86 (see Note 9).

Index to Financial Statements

The Company expenses costs of producing advertising- and sales-related collateral materials as incurred. Other production costs associated with direct mail programs, placement costs associated with magazine or other printed media and all direct costs associated with trade shows and other sales related events are expensed when the related direct mail is sent, advertising space is used or the event is held. These expenses in 2002, 2003 and 2004 were approximately $0.7 million, $1.4 million and $2.1 million, respectively.

Under the asset and liability method of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (“Statement 109”), deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.

Cash and cash equivalents include cash, certificates of deposit, and securities with original maturities less than ninety days when purchased.

Marketable securities have been classified as available-for-sale and such designation is reevaluated as of each balance sheet date. While the Company’s intent is to hold debt securities to maturity, they are classified as available-for-sale because the sale of such securities may be required prior to maturity. Realized gains and losses are recorded on the specific identification method and are included in other income. Realized and unrealized gains and losses have been insignificant for all periods presented.

Substantially all of the Company’s marketable securities mature on or before June 30, 2005. All are stated at cost, which approximates fair market value as of June 30, 2003 and 2004, and consist of the following (in thousands):

Property and equipment are stated at cost and are being depreciated over their estimated useful lives (3 to 7 years) using the straight-line method. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the life of the lease or the estimated useful life, whichever is shorter.

Index to Financial Statements

The Company periodically reviews the carrying amounts of long-lived assets, to determine whether current events or circumstances, as defined in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, (“Statement 144”), warrant adjustment to such carrying amounts. In reviewing the carrying amounts of long-lived assets, the Company considers, among other factors, the future cash inflows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition less the future cash outflows expected to be necessary to obtain those inflows.

In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, Business Combinations, which eliminates the pooling method of accounting for all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 and addresses the initial recognition and measurement of goodwill and other intangible assets acquired in a business combination. The Company adopted this accounting standard for business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001. See Note 8 for a description of current business combinations.

The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (“Statement 142”), effective July 1, 2001. Statement 142 discontinues the amortization of goodwill and requires future periodic testing of goodwill for impairment. In addition, Statement 142 requires reassessment of the useful lives of previously recognized intangible assets. With the adoption of Statement 142, the Company ceased amortization of goodwill as of July 1, 2001.

Upon adoption of Statement 142, the Company completed an evaluation of its carrying value of goodwill as allowed effective July 1, 2001, resulting in an impairment charge of approximately $676,000, which is recorded as a cumulative change in accounting principle. The Company’s implied fair value of goodwill was $0 as a result of the Company’s allocation of enterprise value, as determined by quoted market prices, to all of the Company’s assets and liabilities.

As of June 30, 2004, Pervasive had goodwill in the amount of $39.0 million associated with the acquisition of Data Junction (see Note 8). The Company previously determined, in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, that it would assess the impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives annually in the fourth quarter, or more frequently if other indicators of impairment arise. Other intangible assets, classified as Purchased Technology on the balance sheet, amounted to $6.6 million (net of accumulated amortization of $0.9 million) as of June 30, 2004. These intangible assets consist of developed technology, including the $6.3 million value assigned to amortizable intangible assets related to developed technology in connection with the acquisition of Data Junction during the second quarter of fiscal 2004, the $550,000 purchase of a database transaction intelligence technology from ThinkNet Inc., a software development company based in Toronto, Ontario and the $600,000 license of full text search technology from ABACUS Research A.G., a software development company based in St. Gallen, Switzerland.

For the Company’s foreign subsidiaries, the functional currency has been determined to be the local currency, and therefore, assets and liabilities are translated at year end exchange rates, and income statement items are translated at average exchange rates prevailing during the year in accordance with Statement 52, Foreign Currency Translation. Such translation adjustments are recorded in aggregate as a component of stockholders’ equity. Gains and losses from foreign currency denominated transactions are included in other income and were not significant in 2002, 2003 or 2004.

Index to Financial Statements

Financial instruments, principally forward pricing contracts, are used by the Company from time to time in the management of its foreign currency exposures. The fair value associated with these forward pricing contracts at June 30, 2003 and 2004 is not material. Gains and losses on foreign currency transaction hedges are recognized in income when realized and offset the foreign exchange gains and losses on the underlying transactions. The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.

Cash equivalents, marketable securities, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other liabilities are stated at cost which approximates fair value due to the short-term maturity of these instruments.

Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist of short-term investments, including marketable securities, and trade receivables. The Company’s short-term investments, which are included in cash and cash equivalents and in marketable securities for reporting purposes, are placed with high credit quality financial institutions and issuers. The Company performs periodic credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and generally does not require collateral. Estimated credit losses are provided for in the financial statements.

AG-TECH Corporation, the Company’s distribution partner in Japan, accounted for approximately 12%, 13% and 12% of the Company’s revenue during the years ended June 30, 2002, 2003 and 2004 respectively (see Note 8).

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The Company has adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (“Statement 123”). Statement 123 prescribes accounting and reporting standards for all stock-based compensation plans, including employee stock options. As allowed by Statement 123, the Company has elected to continue to account for its employee stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related Interpretations. No stock-based employee compensation cost is reflected in net income, as all options granted under the plan had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. The Company has calculated the fair value of options granted in these periods using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and has determined the pro forma impact on net income.

The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options, which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, this option valuation model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Because the Company’s employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management’s opinion, the Black-Scholes model does not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options. For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the options is amortized to expense over the options’ vesting period.

Index to Financial Statements

The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of Statement 123 to stock-based employee compensation (in thousands, except per share data):

During fiscal 2002, 2003 and 2004, the fair value of each option grant was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, with the following weighted average assumptions:

The weighted average grant date fair value per share of options granted during the years ended June 30, 2002, 2003 and 2004 was $2.56, $4.13 and $5.48, respectively.

The Company follows the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, Earnings Per Share (“Statement 128”). Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share includes the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and the number of common equivalent shares which would be issued related to options using the treasury method, unless such additional shares are anti-dilutive.

In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, the Company considers its business activities to be a single segment.

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.

Index to Financial Statements

Depreciation expense was approximately $2.1 million, $1.3 million and $1.0 million for fiscal years ending June 30, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively.

The components of income from continuing operations before income taxes and effect of adoption of new accounting principle consist of the following (in thousands):

As of June 30, 2004, the Company expects that upon filing of its domestic tax return for fiscal year 2004 it will have remaining federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $1.4 million, a research and development credit carryforward of approximately $0.7 million and a foreign tax credit carryforward of approximately $3.5 million. These carryforwards will begin to expire in fiscal 2020, 2013, and 2005, respectively, if not utilized.

Significant components of expense (benefit) for income taxes attributable to continuing operations are as follows (in thousands):

Index to Financial Statements

The Company’s provision for income taxes for the year ended June 30, 2004 consists primarily of withholdings on income generated in foreign countries. The Company’s provision for income taxes differs from the expected provision amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate of 34% to income from continuing operations before income taxes and effect of adoption of new accounting principle for 2002, 2003 and 2004 as a result of the following (in thousands):

The components of deferred income taxes at June 30, 2003 and 2004 are as follows (in thousands):

During the year ending June 30, 2004, the Company filed amended federal tax returns for the June 30, 1997, 1998 and 1999 years to deduct foreign income taxes previously claimed as foreign tax credits in such years. The deduction of foreign income taxes in each year created a net operating loss that was utilized as a carryback in prior years.

The Company has established a valuation allowance equal to the net deferred tax asset due to uncertainties regarding the realization of deferred tax assets based on the Company’s lack of significant earnings history and risks associated with business combinations. The valuation allowance decreased by approximately $0.6 million during the year ended June 30, 2004.

The Company’s employees are offered health coverage under a partially self-funded plan in which the Company purchases specific stop-loss insurance coverage at $35,000 per year, per employee. The Company has also purchased an aggregate stop-loss insurance coverage to limit its maximum annual exposure to claims

Index to Financial Statements

funded. From the date of the acquisition of Data Junction through June 30, 2004, the employees who joined the Company as part of the merger were covered by a fully funded insurance plan. As of July 1, 2004, all employees are covered by the partially self-funded plan. Based on the policy census at July 1, 2004, such maximum annual exposure for the policy year ending June 30, 2005 is approximately $2.0 million. The Company pays a fixed fee per covered individual for administrative costs of the administrator and the cost of the stop-loss insurance purchased on the Company’s behalf. The Company contributes 100% toward the cost to insure each employee and 75% toward the cost to insure dependents for which coverage is requested by the employee. Combined expenses for the partially self-funded and fully funded plans including premiums and claims funded for the years ended June 30, 2002, 2003 and 2004 were approximately $0.8 million, $0.9 million, and $1.2 million respectively.

The Company has a 401(k) retirement plan which is available to all domestic, full-time employees. The Company’s expenses related to the plan were not significant in the years ended June 30, 2002, 2003 or 2004. In December 2002, the Company funded a matching contribution of 10% of participant contributions made during calendar year 2002 for all participants employed by the Company on December 31, 2002. The amount of the match was approximately $56,000 for the year ended June 30, 2003. In April 2004, the Company funded a matching contribution of 10% of participant contributions made during calendar year 2003 for all participants employed by the Company on December 31, 2003. The amount of the match was approximately $81,000 for the year ended June 30, 2004.

The Company’s 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “1997 Purchase Plan”) was adopted by the Board of Directors in July 1997 and approved by the stockholders in August 1997. A total of 1,250,000 shares of common stock have been reserved for issuance under the 1997 Purchase Plan. The 1997 Purchase Plan is intended to qualify under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code and has consecutive and overlapping twenty-four month offering periods that begin every six months. Each twenty-four month offering period includes four six-month purchase periods, during which payroll deductions are accumulated and at the end of which, shares of common stock are purchased with a participant’s accumulated payroll deductions. The 1997 Purchase Plan permits eligible employees to purchase common stock through payroll deductions of up to 500 shares per purchase period. The price of common stock to be purchased under the 1997 Purchase Plan is 85% of the lower of the fair market value of the common stock at the beginning of the offering period or at the end of the relevant purchase period. Through June 30, 2004, 538,358 shares of common stock have been issued under the 1997 Purchase Plan.

The Company’s 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (the 1997 Plan) was adopted by the Board of Directors on May 22, 1997, and approved by the stockholders on August 12, 1997, as the successor to the First Amended and Restated 1994 Incentive Plan (the 1994 Plan). Outstanding options under the 1994 Plan have been incorporated into the 1997 Plan and no further option grants will be made under the 1994 Plan. The incorporated options will continue to be governed by their existing terms, unless the Plan Administrator elects to extend one or more features of the 1997 Plan to those options.

Incentive stock options may be granted to employees of the Company entitling them to purchase shares of common stock for a maximum of ten years (five years in the case of options granted to a person possessing more than 10% of the combined voting power of the Company as of the date of grant). The exercise price for incentive stock options may not be less than fair market value of the common stock on the date of the grant (110% of fair market value in the case of options granted to a person possessing more than 10% of the combined voting power of the Company). Nonqualified stock options may be granted to employees, officers, directors, independent contractors and consultants of the Company. The exercise price for nonqualified stock options may not be less

Index to Financial Statements

than 85% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of the grant (110% of fair market value in the case of options granted to a person possessing more than 10% of the combined voting power of the Company). The Company may also award Restricted Stock and Stock Appreciation Rights subject to provisions in the 1997 Plan.

In July 2001, the Company implemented an option exchange program allowing employees, excluding executive officers, to exchange all stock options to purchase shares of the Company’s stock under the Pervasive Software Inc. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (the Plan) for new options under the Plan. The Company cancelled stock options, representing approximately 770,000 shares, previously granted to those employees who voluntarily participated in the program in exchange for new options, representing an equal number of shares, to be granted on or after February 27, 2002 at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the grant date. On March 4, 2002, the Company granted new options representing approximately 726,000 shares to active employees who participated in the option exchange program. The program was organized to comply with FASB Interpretation No. 44, Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation, and did not result in any additional compensation charges.

The vesting period for stock options is generally a four-year period, except for a portion of the options granted in the option exchange program which vest over a two-year period. Options are generally exercisable by the holder only for the vested portion of each grant.

A summary of changes in common stock options during the year ended June 30, 2002, 2003 and 2004 is as follows:

Index to Financial Statements

The following is additional information relating to options outstanding at June 30, 2004:

At June 30, 2004, 6,977,926 shares of common stock were reserved for future exercise of stock options. As part of the Company’s 1997 Plan, the number of shares of common stock available for issuance automatically increased on July 1 each calendar year beginning July 1, 1998 and ending July 1, 2000 by an amount equal to five percent (5%) of the shares of common stock and common stock equivalents outstanding on the trading day immediately preceding July 1, with a maximum annual increase of 1,000,000 shares. The 1997 Plan was amended in November 2000 to extend the automatic annual increase to July 1 each calendar year beginning July 1, 2001 and ending July 1, 2003, by an amount equal to five percent (5%) of the shares of common stock outstanding on the trading day immediately preceding July 1, with a maximum annual increase of 1,000,000 shares.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share from continuing operations before effect of adoption of new accounting principle (in thousands, except per share data):

At June 30, 2002, 2003 and 2004 approximately 2,619,000, 1,303,000 and 1,329,000 shares, respectively, were not included in the diluted earnings per share calculation since the shares are anti-dilutive.

Index to Financial Statements

On December 4, 2003, the Company purchased Data Junction for cash of approximately $16.6 million, net of cash acquired of $6.5 million and including acquisition costs of approximately $1.0 million, and 5,000,000 shares of common stock valued at $30.0 million, based on the average market value of the Company’s common stock a few days before and after the acquisition was agreed to and announced on August 8, 2003. Accordingly, the results of operations of the acquired business are included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company from the date of acquisition. The Company acquired Data Junction to broaden its data infrastructure capabilities, increase the Company’s size and scale, and leverage the increased customer base of the combined companies. The contributing factors to the purchase price paid by the Company consisted primarily of Data Junction’s historical earnings and cash flow from operations and perceived market opportunity for future growth. The purchase price was allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities assumed, based upon management’s estimate of their fair values as of the acquisition date.

A summary of the purchase price for the Data Junction acquisition is as follows (in millions):

The value of purchased technology was determined by discounting the incremental earnings attributable to all existing technology which had reached technological feasibility, after considering risks relating to: (i) the expected lifecycle of the technology, (ii) the expected annual operating profit related to the technology, and (iii) the future cash flows associated with the technology. Estimates of future revenues and expenses used to determine the value of developed technology was consistent with the historical trends in the industry and expected outlooks. The purchased technology is being amortized over its respective useful life of five years using the straight-line method.

Of the total purchase price, $1.1 million was allocated to in-process research and development (“IPR&D”) and was expensed upon acquisition. The value of IPR&D was based on an evaluation of all developmental projects using the guidance set forth in FASB Interpretation No. 4, Applicability of FASB Statement No. 2 to Business Combinations Accounted for by the Purchase Method. Projects that qualify as IPR&D represent those that have not yet reached technological feasibility and for which no future alternative uses existed. Technological feasibility is defined as being equivalent to a beta-phase working prototype in which there is no remaining risk relating to the development.

The value of the IPR&D was determined by (i) estimating future revenue and operating profits associated with existing development projects, (ii) projecting the future cash flows and costs to complete the underlying

Index to Financial Statements

technologies and resultant products and (iii) discounting these cash flows to their net present value. Estimates of future revenue and expenses used to determine the value of in-process research and development were consistent with the historical trends in the industry and the expected outlooks. The entire amount of $1.1 million was charged to operations because related technologies had not reached technological feasibility and they had no alternative use.

The following table represents the Company’s unaudited pro forma results of operations for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 as if the acquisition of Data Junction had occurred as of the beginning of the applicable period. The pro forma information excludes IPR&D charges of $1.1 million in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, as these charges are nonrecurring charges resulting from the acquisition and further excludes a non-recurring charge of $1.2 million related to the transfer of life insurance policies included in Data Junction’s results in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003. The unaudited pro forma financial information has been prepared for comparative purposes only and there can be no assurance that this presentation reflects the results of operations that would have occurred had Data Junction been consolidated with the Company during the applicable periods (in millions, except per share data).

In July 2001, the Company and Pervasive Software Co. Ltd. (“Pervasive Japan”) formed a new business venture with AG-TECH Corporation, a company developing, selling and importing packaged software, to sell and support the Company’s products in Japan. AG-TECH has been engaged in the sales and support of Btrieve (predecessor to Pervasive.SQL) and Pervasive.SQL products since 1986. In conjunction with the joint venture, AG-TECH receives a discount on the purchase of Pervasive products in Japan, in exchange for assuming responsibility for OEM sales, packaged software sales, technical support and localization and translation of the Company’s products into Japanese. In connection with the formation of the new business venture, Pervasive Japan loaned AG-TECH 48 million yen (approximately $0.4 million), under a two-year note payable in eight quarterly installments, bearing interest at 2% per annum, individually guaranteed by two principals of AG-TECH. As of June 30, 2003, the loan was repaid in full. The Company acquired less than 20% of the equity of AG-TECH and the right to name one member of the board of directors of AG-TECH. In June 2004, the Company renewed portions of its distribution agreement with AG-TECH for an additional three year period ending June 30, 2007. The Company does not have the ability to significantly influence or control the operations of AG-TECH and therefore accounts for its investment in AG-TECH on the cost method of accounting.

Index to Financial Statements

goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives annually in the fourth quarter, or more frequently if other indicators of impairment arise. Other intangible assets, classified as Purchased Technology on the balance sheet, amounted to $6.6 million (net of accumulated amortization of $0.9 million) as of June 30, 2004. These intangible assets consist of developed technology, including the $6.3 million value assigned to amortizable intangible assets related to developed technology in connection with the acquisition of Data Junction during the second quarter of fiscal 2004, the $550,000 purchase of a database transaction intelligence technology from ThinkNet Inc., a software development company based in Toronto, Ontario and the $600,000 license of full text search technology from ABACUS Research A.G., a software development company based in St. Gallen, Switzerland.

The Company is amortizing these assets on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, generally five to ten years. Amortization expense for the years ended June 30, 2003 and 2004 was approximately $14,000 and $854,000 respectively. Amortization expense for intangible assets for each of the years ended June 30, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 is anticipated to be $1.4 million and for the year ended June 30, 2009 is anticipated to be $0.9 million.

The Company leases its headquarters and remote office space and, in some cases, is obligated for its proportionate share of utilities and other defined operating expenses of the related building. The Company has executed a $175,000 letter of credit as required under the headquarters office lease. Office rent expense for the Company’s domestic and international offices for the years ended June 30, 2002, 2003 and 2004, was approximately $2,878,000, $2,432,000, and $2,339,000 respectively, net of approximately $437,000 and $139,000 of sublease income for the years ended June 30, 2002 and 2003, respectively.

Future minimum lease payments at June 30, 2004 under the operating leases for worldwide office space are as follows (in thousands):

In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45, Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others (FIN 45). FIN 45 requires certain guarantees to be recorded at fair value and requires a guarantor to make disclosures, even when the likelihood of making any payments under the guarantee is remote. For those guarantees and indemnifications that do not fall within initial recognition and measurement requirements of FIN 45, the Company must continue to monitor the conditions that are subject to the guarantees and indemnifications, as required under existing

Index to Financial Statements

generally accepted accounting principles, to identify if a loss has been incurred. If the Company determines that it is probable that a loss has been incurred, any such estimable loss would be recognized. The initial recognition and measurement requirements do not apply to the Company’s product warranties or to the provisions contained in the majority of the Company’s software license agreements that indemnify licensees of the Company’s software from damages and costs resulting from claims alleging that the Company’s software infringes the intellectual property rights of a third party. The Company has historically received only a limited number of requests for payment under these provisions and has not been required to make material payments pursuant to these provisions. The Company has not identified any losses that are probable under these provisions and, accordingly, the Company has not recorded a liability related to these indemnification provisions.

The Company is involved in various legal proceedings which arise from time to time in the normal course of business. While the ultimate results of such matters generally cannot be predicted with certainty, management does not expect any such matters to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position and results of operations as of June 30, 2004.

The Company is engaged in the design, development and marketing of data infrastructure software. The Company considers its business activities to constitute a single segment of business.

A summary of the Company’s continuing operations by geographic area follows (in thousands):

Index to Financial Statements

The (increase) decrease in current assets from continuing operations reflected in the consolidated statements of cash flows is comprised of the following (in thousands):

The increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities from continuing operations reflected in the consolidated statements of cash flows is comprised of the following (in thousands):


		Page
PART I		1
Item 1. Business		1
Item 2. Properties		26
Item 3. Legal Proceedings		26
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of the Security Holders		26
Item 4a. Executive Officers of the Registrant		27

PART II		29
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters		29
Item 6. Selected Consolidated Financial Data		30
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		31
Item 7a. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		40
Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data		41
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure		41
Item 9a. Controls and Procedures		41

PART III		42
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant		42
Item 11. Executive Compensation		42
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management		42
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions		42
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services		42

PART IV		43
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K		43

SIGNATURES		45


Fiscal 2002	High		Low
First Quarter	$	2.07	$	1.22
Second Quarter	$	3.30	$	1.30
Third Quarter	$	5.12	$	2.90
Fourth Quarter	$	4.52	$	3.11


Fiscal 2003	High		Low
First Quarter	$	4.10	$	2.86
Second Quarter	$	4.45	$	2.30
Third Quarter	$	4.69	$	3.97
Fourth Quarter	$	5.77	$	4.39


Fiscal 2004	High		Low
First Quarter	$	8.25	$	5.38
Second Quarter	$	8.09	$	7.04
Third Quarter	$	8.51	$	6.30
Fourth Quarter	$	7.25	$	5.12


	Year Ended June 30,
	2000			2001			2002			2003			2004
	(in thousands, except per share data)
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
Revenues :
Product licenses	$	49,709		$	39,200		$	34,008		$	35,374		$	40,967
Services and other		2,369			2,958			3,189			3,831			8,641

Total revenue		52,078			42,158			37,197			39,205			49,608
Costs and expenses:
Cost of product licenses		2,766			2,645			1,043			991			1,712
Cost of services and other		6,124			7,015			5,513			4,907			5,519
Sales and marketing		19,402			18,357			12,349			13,673			18,311
Research and development		13,720			10,545			7,055			8,033			9,983
General and administrative		5,755			6,025			5,371			4,866			5,228
Business restructuring charge		—			2,472			—			—			—
Write-off of acquired in-process research and development		—			—			—			—			1,084

Total costs and expenses		47,767			47,059			31,331			32,470			41,837

Operating income (loss) from continuing operations		4,311			(4,901	)		5,866			6,735			7,771
Interest and other income, net		1,602			1,253			742			534			293
Income tax provision		(1,774	)		(500	)		(570	)		(580	)		(750	)
Minority interest in earnings of subsidiary, net of income taxes		(19	)		—			—			—			—

Income (loss) from continuing operations before effect of adoption of new accounting principle		4,120			(4,148	)		6,038			6,689			7,314
Effect of adoption of new accounting principle		—			—			(676	)		—			—

Income (loss) from continuing operations .		4,120			(4,148	)		5,362			6,689			7,314

Discontinued operations:
Loss from operations		(17,146	)		—			—			—			—
Income tax benefit		1,094			—			—			—			—
Gain (loss) on disposal		(16,963	)		1,692			—			159			—

Gain (loss) from discontinued operations		(33,015	)		1,692			—			159			—

Net income (loss)	$	(28,895	)	$	(2,456	)	$	5,362		$	6,848		$	7,314

Basic earnings (loss) per share:
Income (loss) from continuing operations before effect of adoption of new accounting principle	$	0.26		$	(0.26	)	$	0.36		$	0.40		$	0.37
Effect of adoption of new accounting principle		—			—			(0.04	)		—			—
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations		(2.11	)		0.11			—			0.01			—

Net income (loss)	$	(1.85	)	$	(0.16	)	$	0.32		$	0.41		$	0.37

Diluted earnings (loss) per share:
Income (loss) from continuing operations before effect of adoption of new accounting principle	$	0.23		$	(0.26	)	$	0.34		$	0.37		$	0.33
Effect of adoption of new accounting principle		—			—			(0.04	)		—			—
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations		(1.87	)		0.11			—			0.01			—

Net income (loss)	$	(1.64	)	$	(0.16	)	$	0.30		$	0.38		$	0.33

Shares used in computing basic earnings (loss) per share		15,648			15,830			16,827			16,663			19,801
Shares used in computing diluted earnings (loss) per share		17,622			15,830			17,674			17,917			21,951

	June 30,
	2000			2001			2002			2003			2004
	(in thousands)
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
Working capital	$	22,365		$	23,565		$	30,195		$	37,004		$	30,729
Total assets		47,248			40,468			43,359			50,592			93,868
Long-term liabilities, net of current portion		—			—			—			—			—
Total stockholders’ equity		32,644			29,679			33,792			40,202			79,085


Name	Age	Position
David Sikora	43	President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
John E. Farr	44	Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary
Michael Hoskins	50	Chief Technology Officer and Director
Jeffrey S. Seiden	45	Vice President, Corporate Development
Suaad H. Sait	37	Vice President and General Manager, Products and Markets
Chip G. Harmon	51	Vice President, North American Sales
Gilbert Van Cutsem	41	Vice President, EMEAA Sales and Marketing
Curtis Hill	51	Vice President, Engineering
Michele B. Thompson	45	Vice President, Business Operations and Legal Affairs


	Year Ended June 30,
	2002		2003		2004
Revenues :
Product licenses	91	%	90	%	83	%
Services and others	9		10		17

Total revenues	100	%	100	%	100	%
Costs and expenses:
Cost of product licenses	3		3		3
Cost of services and other	15		12		11
Sales and marketing	33		35		37
Research and development	19		21		20
General and administrative	14		12		11
Write-off of acquired in-process research and development	—		—		2

Total costs and expenses	84		83		84

Operating income from continuing operations	16		17		16
Interest and other income, net	2		1		1
Income tax provision	(2	)	(1	)	(2	)

Income from continuing operations before effect of adoption of new accounting principle	16		17		15
Effect of adoption of new accounting principle	(2	)	—		—

Income from continuing operations	14		17		15

Gain from discontinued operations	—		—		—

Net income	14	%	17	%	15	%


	Quarter Ended
	Sept. 30 2002			Dec. 31 2002			Mar. 31 2003			June 30 2003			Sept. 30 2003			Dec. 31 2003			Mar. 31 2004			June 30 2004
	(in thousands, except per share data)
Revenues :
Product licenses	$	8,281		$	8,755		$	9,084		$	9,254		$	8,276		$	9,856		$	11,147		$	11,688
Services and other		895			1,028			948			960			1,115			1,654			3,055			2,817

Total revenue		9,176			9,783			10,032			10,214			9,391			11,510			14,202			14,505
Costs and expenses:
Cost of product licenses		239			224			256			273			212			374			553			574
Cost of services and other		1,311			1,225			1,223			1,147			1,044			1,228			1,627			1,618
Sales and marketing		3,190			3,412			3,592			3,479			3,354			3,943			5,621			5,394
Research and development		1,964			2,022			1,912			2,135			2,058			2,330			2,768			2,828
General and administrative		1,177			1,295			1,231			1,163			1,194			1,556			1,166			1,312
Write-off of acquired in-process research and development		—			—			—			—			—			1,084			—			—

Total costs and expenses		7,881			8,178			8,214			8,197			7,862			10,515			11,735			11,726

Operating income from continuing operations		1,295			1,605			1,818			2,017			1,529			995			2,467			2,779
Interest and other income, net		162			149			116			107			92			82			47			72
Income tax provision		(150	)		(150	)		(150	)		(130	)		(175	)		(175	)		(200	)		(200	)

Income from continuing operations		1,307			1,604			1,784			1,994			1,446			902			2,314			2,651

Discontinued operations:
Gain on disposal		159			—			—			—			—			—			—			—

Gain from discontinued operations		159			—			—			—			—			—			—			—

Net income	$	1,466		$	1,604		$	1,784		$	1,994		$	1,446		$	902		$	2,314		$	2,651

Basic earnings per share:
Income from continuing operations	$	0.08		$	0.10		$	0.11		$	0.12		$	0.09		$	0.05		$	0.11		$	0.12
Gain from discontinued operations		0.01			—			—			—			—			—			—			—

Net income	$	0.09		$	0.10		$	0.11		$	0.12		$	0.09		$	0.05		$	0.11		$	0.12

Diluted earnings per share:
Income from continuing operations	$	0.07		$	0.09		$	0.10		$	0.11		$	0.08		$	0.04		$	0.10		$	0.11
Gain from discontinued operations		0.01			—			—			—			—			—			—			—

Net income	$	0.08		$	0.09		$	0.10		$	0.11		$	0.08		$	0.04		$	0.10		$	0.11


2005	$	1,771
2006		1,769
2007		1,727
2008		1,647
2009		549
Thereafter		—

	$	7,463


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2003 and 2004		F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2004.		F-4
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2004		F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2004		F-6
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements		F-7


2.1⁺		Merger Agreement dated as of August 8, 2003 among Pervasive Software Inc., Ramal Acquisition Corp., Data Junction Corporation, Michael E. Hoskins, The Hoskins 2003 Charitable Remainder Unitrust with Makeup, Darrell G. Blandford, The Blandford 2003 Charitable Remainder Trust with Makeup, Gregory E. Grosh, The Gregory E. Grosh Charitable Remainder Unitrust (Gregory E. Grosh Trustee), Ron S. Dougherty and Computershare Trust Company, Inc., as escrow agent.

3.1*		Restated Certificate of Incorporation

3.2*		Bylaws of the Company

4.1*		Reference is made to Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2

4.2*		Specimen Common Stock certificate

4.3***		Rights Agreement dated October 20, 2000, between the Company and Computershare Trust Company, Inc. as Rights Agent

10.1*		Form of Indemnification Agreement

10.2*		1997 Stock Incentive Plan

10.3*		Employee Stock Purchase Plan

10.4*		First Amended and Restated 1994 Incentive Plan

10.10**		Lease agreement dated April 2, 1998, between the Company and CarrAmerica Realty, L.P. T/A Riata Corporate Park


23.1		Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

31.1		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-a4(a) Certification executed by David Sikora, Chief Executive Officer

31.2		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-a4(a) Certification executed by John Farr, Chief Financial Officer

32.1		Certifications required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350) executed by David Sikora, Chief Executive Officer and John Farr, Chief Financial Officer


Signature	Title	Date

/s/ DAVID SIKORA David Sikora	President and Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)	September 13, 2004

/s/ JOHN E. FARR John E. Farr	Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)	September 13, 2004

/s/ SHELBY H. CARTER, JR. Shelby H. Carter, Jr.	Director and Chairman of the Board	September 13, 2004

/s/ NANCY R. WOODWARD Nancy R. Woodward	Director and Vice-Chairman of the Board	September 13, 2004

/s/ DAVID A. BOUCHER David A. Boucher	Director	September 13, 2004

/s/ DAVID R. BRADFORD David R. Bradford	Director	September 13, 2004

/s/ JEFFREY S. HAWN Jeffrey S. Hawn	Director	September 13, 2004

/s/ MICHAEL E. HOSKINS Michael E. Hoskins	Director	September 13, 2004


Description	Balance at Beginning of Period		Additions Charged to Costs and Expenses		Deductions/ Write-offs Charged to Allowance		Other Additions*		Balance at End of Period
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts:
Year ended June 30, 2002	$	400	$	237	$	287	$	—	$	350
Year ended June 30, 2003		350		86		92		—		344
Year ended June 30, 2004		344		94		94		134		478

Valuation Allowance for Deferred Tax Assets:
Year ended June 30, 2002		16,005		4,952		—		—		20,957
Year ended June 30, 2003		20,957		—		6,603		—		14,354
Year ended June 30, 2004		14,354		—		592		—		13,762


		Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2003 and 2004		F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2004		F-4
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2004		F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2004		F-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		F-7


	Year ended June 30
	2002			2003			2004
	(in thousands, except per share data)
Revenues:
Product licenses	$	34,008		$	35,373		$	40,967
Services and other		3,189			3,832			8,641

Total revenue		37,197			39,205			49,608
Costs and expenses:
Cost of product licenses		1,043			991			1,712
Cost of services and other		5,513			4,907			5,519
Sales and marketing		12,349			13,673			18,311
Research and development		7,055			8,033			9,983
General and administrative		5,371			4,866			5,228
Write-off of acquired in-process research and development		—			—			1,084

Total costs and expenses		31,331			32,470			41,837

Operating income from continuing operations		5,866			6,735			7,771
Interest and other income		742			534			293

Income from continuing operations before income taxes and effect of adoption of new accounting principle		6,608			7,269			8,064
Income tax provision		(570	)		(580	)		(750	)

Income from continuing operations before effect of adoption of new accounting principle		6,038			6,689			7,314
Effect of adoption of new accounting principle		(676	)		—			—

Income from continuing operations		5,362			6,689			7,314

Discontinued operations:
Gain on disposal		—			159			—

Gain from discontinued operations		—			159			—

Net income	$	5,362		$	6,848		$	7,314

Basic earnings per share:
Income from continuing operations before effect of adoption of new accounting principle	$	0.36		$	0.40		$	0.37
Effect of adoption of new accounting principle		(0.04	)		—			—
Gain from discontinued operations		—			0.01			—

Net income	$	0.32		$	0.41		$	0.37

Diluted earnings per share:
Income from continuing operations before effect of adoption of new accounting principle	$	0.34		$	0.37		$	0.33
Effect of adoption of new accounting principle		(0.04	)		—			—
Gain from discontinued operations		—			0.01			—

Net income	$	0.30		$	0.38		$	0.33


	Common Stock			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Retained Earnings (Deficit)			Total Stockholders’ Equity
	(in thousands, except share data)
Balances at June 30, 2001	$	60,148		$	(991	)	$	(29,478	)	$	29,679
Acquisition of 685,888 treasury shares, cumulative treasury shares of 853,549 and cost of $1,542 at June 30, 2002		(1,487	)		—			—			(1,487	)
Issuance of 1,477,566 shares of common stock pursuant to the exercise of stock options		428			—			—			428
Issuance of 76,074 shares of common stock pursuant to the employee stock purchase plan		105			—			—			105
Issuance of note receivable to executive officer pursuant to the exercise of stock options		(131	)		—			—			(131	)
Reduction of note receivable to executive officer pursuant to the exercise of stock options		33			—			—			33
Foreign currency translation adjustment		—			(197	)		—			(197	)
Net income		—			—			5,362			5,362

Total comprehensive income											5,165

Balances at June 30, 2002		59,096			(1,188	)		(24,116	)		33,792

Acquisition of 277,350 treasury shares, cumulative treasury shares of 1,130,899 and cost of $2,471 at June 30, 2003		(929	)		—			—			(929	)
Issuance of 168,438 shares of common stock pursuant to the exercise of stock options		331			—			—			331
Issuance of 79,921 shares of common stock pursuant to the employee stock purchase plan		130			—			—			130
Reduction of note receivable to executive officer pursuant to the exercise of stock options		32			—			—			32
Foreign currency translation adjustment		—			(2	)		—			(2	)
Net income		—			—			6,848			6,848

Total comprehensive income											6,846

Balances at June 30, 2003		58,660			(1,190	)		(17,268	)		40,202
Issuance of 461,613 shares of common stock pursuant to the exercise of stock options		1,186			—			—			1,186
Issuance of 70,587 shares of common stock pursuant to the employee stock purchase plan		273			—			—			273
Reduction of note receivable to executive officer pursuant to the exercise of stock options		65			—			—			65
Issuance of 4,999,962 shares of common stock pursuant to the acquisition of Data Junction Corporation		30,000			—			—			30,000
Foreign currency translation adjustment		—			45			—			45
Net income		—			—			7,314			7,314

Total comprehensive income											7,359

Balances at June 30, 2004	$	90,184		$	(1,145	)	$	(9,954	)	$	79,085


	Employee Stock Options						Employee Stock
	2002		2003		2004		2003		2004
Risk free interest rate	4.26	%	2.45	%	2.96	%	1.45	%	1.14	%
Dividend yield	0.00	%	0.00	%	0.00	%	0.00	%	0.00	%
Volatility factor	1.489		1.30		1.235		1.30		1.235
Weighted average expected life of options (in years)	4		4		4		0.5		0.5


	Shares		Range of Exercise Prices	Weighted Average Exercise Price
Options outstanding, June 30, 2001	5,343,432		$0.10—24.88	$	3.79
Granted	1,622,000		$1.29— 3.70	$	3.08
Granted (Option Exchange Program)	726,050		$3.01	$	3.01
Exercised	(1,477,566	)	$0.10— 3.09	$	0.31
Surrendered	(1,022,869	)	$0.30—24.88	$	4.75
Surrendered (Option Exchange Program)	(769,925	)	$1.06—24.88	$	6.47

Options outstanding, June 30, 2002	4,421,122		$0.13—24.88	$	3.88
Granted	1,076,200		$3.01— 5.65	$	5.01
Exercised	(168,438	)	$0.13— 3.09	$	1.78
Surrendered	(444,950	)	$1.06—16.81	$	4.34

Options outstanding, June 30, 2003	4,883,934		$0.13—24.88	$	4.13
Granted	1,487,500		$5.83— 8.15	$	6.83
Exercised	(461,613	)	$0.13— 7.00	$	2.83
Surrendered	(961,059	)	$1.06—24.88	$	6.15

Options outstanding, June 30, 2004	4,948,762		$0.13—16.81	$	4.67


	Options Outstanding				Options Exercisable
Range of Exercise Price	Number of Options	Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life of Options	Weighted Average Exercise Price		Number of Options	Weighted Average Exercise Price
$ 0.13 to $2.00	455,037	6.61	$	1.34	308,162	$	1.34
$ 2.31 to $3.99	2,106,999	7.57	$	3.19	1,191,412	$	3.15
$ 4.10 to $5.83	1,152,376	9.24	$	5.53	178,375	$	5.41
$ 6.88 to $9.88	1,157,100	9.07	$	7.22	110,600	$	7.99
$ 10.00 to $16.81	77,250	5.17	$	13.37	77,250	$	13.37

$ 0.13 to $16.81	4,948,762	8.18	$	4.67	1,865,799	$	3.78


Cash paid to acquire stock, net of cash acquired of $6.5 million	$	15.6
Cash paid and accrued for transaction costs		1.0

		16.6
Shares issued to acquire stock		30.0

Total	$	46.6

The purchase price was allocated as follows:
Purchased technology	$	6.3
In-process research and development		1.1
Goodwill		39.0
Fair value of net tangible assets acquired, excluding cash		0.2

	$	46.6


	Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
	2003 Pro forma (unaudited)		2004 Pro forma (unaudited)
Net revenue	$	53.2	$	55.3
Income from continuing operations		7.8		8.6
Net income		8.0		8.6
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations	$	0.34	$	0.36
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.35	$	0.36


Purchased technology	$	7,484,000
Accumulated amortization		(867,717	)

	$	6,616,283