FORM 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2006

OR

For the transition period from __________________ to _________________

Commission file number 0-18110

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes   X            No       

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer        Accelerated filer   X   Non-accelerated filer       

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes                 No   X  

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Gehl Company

FORM 10-Q

September 30, 2006

Report Index

-2-

PART I – Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements

Gehl Company and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
(unaudited and in thousands, except per share data)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

-3-

Gehl Company and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(unaudited and in thousands, except share data)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

-4-

Gehl Company and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited and in thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

-5-

Gehl Company and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2006
(Unaudited)

Note 1 – Basis of Presentation

        The condensed consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although management believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.

        In the opinion of management, the information furnished for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005 include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring accruals, necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations and financial position of the Company. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. Such reclassifications had no impact on previously reported net income. Due, in part, to the seasonal nature of the Company’s business, the results of operations for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year.

        Effective January 1, 2006, the Company’s fiscal quarter-ends were converted to calendar quarter-ends on a prospective basis. For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006, the prior year comparative period consisted of one additional day. The Company’s year-end will remain December 31, consistent with all prior years.

        It is suggested that these interim financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Note 2 – Significant Accounting Policies

        Stock-Based Compensation: Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS No. 123R”) using the modified prospective method, in which compensation cost was recognized beginning with the effective date based on the requirements of SFAS No. 123R for all share-based payments granted after the effective date and all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date of SFAS No. 123R that were unvested on the effective date.

        Prior to adopting SFAS No. 123R, as permitted under SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (SFAS No. 123), the Company elected to follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB No. 25”), and related interpretations in accounting for stock-based awards to employees through December 31, 2005. Accordingly, compensation cost for stock options and restricted stock grants was measured as the excess, if any, of the market price of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant over the exercise price. All employee stock options were granted at the grant day market price resulting in no compensation cost for prior periods. All stock-based compensation expense prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R related to restricted stock grants. See Note 4, “Stock-Based Compensation,” for more information.

-6-

Note 3 – Discontinued Operations

        During March 2006, the Company decided to discontinue the manufacturing and distribution of agricultural implement products. The agricultural implement business included one manufacturing facility and related manufacturing machinery and equipment. The reduction in headcount totaled 140 employees which included both manufacturing and administrative positions related to the agricultural implements business. As a result of this action, the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes have been restated to present the results of the agricultural implement business as a discontinued operation.

        The discontinuation of the agricultural implement business resulted in an after-tax charge to the Company’s earnings for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006 of $7.8 million, or $0.62 per diluted share. The after-tax charge reflects a reduction from the previous estimate of $9.0 million, or $.73 per diluted share, due to higher than expected proceeds from the sale of machinery and equipment associated with the discontinued operations. The after-tax charge is comprised of non-cash asset impairment charges of $5.9 million related to agricultural implement field and factory inventory and certain property, plant and equipment, and cash charges related to severance and other employee termination costs of $1.9 million. The Company does not anticipate additional charges during the fourth quarter of 2006.

The following table summarizes the pre-tax charge associated with the discontinued operations (in thousands):

-7-

        The Company has reflected the results of its agricultural implements business as discontinued operations in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and prior periods have been restated. Summary results of operations for the agricultural implements business were as follows (in thousands):

        The assets of the agricultural implements business are reflected as net assets of discontinued operations in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and were as follows (in thousands):

Note 4 – Stock-Based Compensation

        The Company maintains equity incentive plans for certain of its directors, officers and key employees. The Company currently has three primary equity incentive plans: the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan, the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan, and the 1995 Stock Option Plan. The 2004 Equity Incentive Plan, which was adopted in April 2004 and amended in April 2006, authorizes the granting of awards with respect to up to 737,500 shares of the Company’s common stock. During April 2000, the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan was adopted, which authorizes the granting of awards with respect to up to 812,771 shares of the Company’s common stock. An award is defined within the 2004 and 2000 Equity Incentive Plan as a stock option, stock appreciation right, restricted stock or performance share. In April 1996, the 1995 Stock Option Plan was adopted, which authorizes the granting of options to purchase up to 726,627 shares of the Company’s common stock. These plans provide that options be granted at an exercise price not less than fair market value on the date the options are granted and that the options generally vest ratably over a period not exceeding three years after the grant date. The option period may not be more than ten years after the grant date.

-8-

Stock option activity under all of the Company’s equity incentive plans since December 31, 2005 is summarized as follows:

        In the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006, the Company awarded 129,284 stock options with a weighted average grant date fair value of $13.80, to purchase common stock to certain officers, key employees and directors. There were no stock options awarded in the three-month periods ended September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005. Awards of stock options under the plans are subject to certain vesting requirements. There were 24,000 stock options granted in the nine-month period ended October 1, 2005. The aggregate intrinsic value of the options exercised during the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 totaled $0.3 million and $3.4 million, respectively.

Options outstanding under the plans at September 30, 2006 were as follows:

Options exercisable under the plan at September 30, 2006 were as follows:

-9-

        In 2006 and 2005, the Company awarded restricted shares under the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan to certain officers and key employees. Awards of restricted stock under the plan are subject to certain vesting requirements ranging from three to five years. Following is a summary of restricted stock activity in the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006:

        Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123R which establishes accounting for equity instruments exchanged for employee services. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 123R, share-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on a calculated fair value of the award, and is recognized as an expense over the employee’s requisite service period (vesting period of the equity grant). Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for share-based compensation to employees in accordance with APB No. 25 and related interpretations. The Company also followed the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 as amended by SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure” (“SFAS No. 148”). The Company elected to adopt the modified prospective transition method as provided by SFAS No. 123R and, accordingly, financial statement amounts for the prior periods presented in this Form 10-Q have not been restated to reflect the fair value method of expensing share-based compensation.

        The Company estimates the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes valuation model. Key input assumptions used to estimate the fair value of stock options include the exercise price of the award, the expected option term, the expected volatility of the Company’s stock over the option’s expected term, the risk-free interest rate over the option’s expected term, and the Company’s expected annual dividend yield. The Company believes that the valuation technique and the approach utilized to develop the underlying assumptions are appropriate in calculating the fair values of the Company’s stock options granted in the nine month period ended September 30, 2006. Estimates of fair value are not intended to predict actual future events or the value ultimately realized by persons who receive equity awards.

        The fair value of the option grants during the nine-months ended September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005 were estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

-10-

        For the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006, the Company recognized pre-tax compensation expense of $0.3 million and $0.8 million, respectively, related to unvested stock options. The after tax impact totaled $0.2 million and $0.5 million or $0.02 and $0.04 per diluted share, respectively.

        As of September 30, 2006, there was $2.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Company’s equity incentive plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.5 years.

        The Company did not recognize compensation expense for employee share-based awards for the nine months ended October 1, 2005, as the exercise price of the Company’s employee stock awards equaled the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant. The Company did recognize compensation expense under APB No. 25 relating to certain restricted stock grants as the grants have no exercise price.

        The Company had previously adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123 as amended by SFAS No. 148 through disclosure only. The following table illustrates the effects on net income and earnings per share for the three- and nine-months ended October 1, 2005 as if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 to share based employee awards (in thousands, except per share data).

Note 5 – Income Taxes

        The income tax provision is determined by applying an estimated annual effective income tax rate to income before income taxes. The estimated annual effective income tax rate is based on the most recent annualized forecast of pretax income, permanent book/tax differences and tax credits.

-11-

Note 6 – Finance Contracts Receivable Financing

        In March 2006, the Company entered into an asset securitization facility (“the Securitization Facility”) with a financial institution (the “Purchaser”) whereby the Company can sell, through a revolving securitization facility, up to $300 million of retail and fleet installment sale contracts (“installment sale contracts” or “finance contracts receivable”). The Securitization Facility has a final maturity date in March 2009, subject to annual renewal by the Purchaser. Under the Securitization Facility, the Company sells portfolios of its finance contracts receivable to a wholly-owned, bankruptcy-remote special purpose subsidiary (“SPE”) which, in turn, sells each such portfolio to a wholly-owned bankruptcy-remote special purpose subsidiary of the SPE. The wholly-owned bankruptcy-remote special purpose subsidiary of the SPE sells a participating interest in each such portfolio of finance contracts receivable to the Purchaser (approximately 90% of the discounted value of the finance contract receivable portfolio). The Purchaser has no recourse against the Company for uncollectible finance contracts receivable, if any; however, the Company’s retained interest in the portfolio of finance contracts receivable is subordinate to the Purchaser’s interest. The Company has retained collection and administrative responsibilities for each sold portfolio of finance contracts receivable. The Company incurred one-time transaction costs of $0.7 million, which are included in other expense in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income, related to the implementation of the Securitization Facility.

        The Securitization Facility replaced the previous $150 million revolving securitization facility the Company terminated in February 2006. The participating interest in finance contracts receivable that had been sold under the previous securitization facility was purchased by the Purchaser in March 2006.

        The following summarizes the Company’s sales of retail finance contracts receivable through asset securitization facilities (in thousands):

        The Company’s retained interest is recorded at fair value, which is calculated based on the present value of estimated future cash flows and reflects prepayment and loss assumptions, which are based on historical results. At September 30, 2006, the fair value of the retained interest was calculated using an interpolated risk-free rate of return of 4.69% based on U.S. Treasury rates, an approximate 17 month weighted-average prepayable portfolio life and an approximate 1.0% annual loss rate. Changes in any of these assumptions could affect the calculated value of the retained interest. A 10% increase in the discount rate would decrease the fair value of the retained interest by $0.2 million. A 10% increase in the annual loss rate would decrease the fair value of the retained interest by $0.7 million. Retained interest of $18.2 million was included in other current assets and $15.2 million was included in other assets in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2006.

        The total credit capacity under the 2006 Securitization Facility is $300 million, with finance contracts receivable sold and being serviced by the Company totaling $207.4 million at September 30, 2006. Of the $207.4 million in sold contracts receivable, $5.4 million were greater than 60 days past due at September 30, 2006. There were no credit losses on contracts sold through the Securitization Facility during the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006.

-12-

        During the nine-month period ended October 1, 2005, the loss on sale of finance contracts was impacted by a $0.4 million realized gain on interest rate swap contracts that were put in place to hedge gains/losses on the sale of finance contracts receivable (see Note 12). The Company received $0.5 million and $1.1 million in service fee income during the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006, respectively.

        In addition to the sale of finance contracts receivable through the asset securitization program, the Company sold finance contracts receivable through limited recourse arrangements during 2006 and 2005. Based on the terms of these sales, recourse to the Company is limited to 5% of the sold portfolio of finance contracts receivable. Amounts to cover potential losses on these sold finance contracts receivable are included in the allowance for doubtful accounts.

        The following table summarizes the Company’s sales of finance contracts receivable through these arrangements (in thousands):

        At September 30, 2006, the Company serviced $336.3 million of sold finance contracts receivable of which $207.4 million, $85.8 million and $43.2 million were sold through the Securitization Facility, limited recourse arrangements and full recourse arrangements, respectively.

        The finance contracts require periodic installments of principal and interest over periods of up to 66 months, with fixed interest rates based on market conditions at the time of origination. The Company has retained the servicing of substantially all of these contracts which generally have maturities of 12 to 60 months. The sales of finance contracts receivable were accounted for as a sale in accordance with SFAS No. 140 “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities—a Replacement of FASB Statement No. 125.” Sales of finance contracts receivable are reflected as a reduction of finance contracts receivable in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and the proceeds received are included in cash flows from operating activities in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.

-13-

Note 7 – Inventories

        If all of the Company’s inventories had been valued on a current cost basis, which approximated FIFO value, estimated inventories by major classification would have been as follows (in thousands):

Note 8 – Product Warranties and Other Guarantees

        In general, the Company provides warranty coverage on equipment for a period of up to twelve months. The Company’s reserve for warranty claims is established based on the best estimate of the amounts necessary to settle future and existing claims on products sold as of the balance sheet date. The Company records warranty expense as a component of selling, general and administrative expense. While the Company’s warranty costs have historically been within its calculated estimates, it is possible that future warranty costs could differ from those estimates. The changes in the carrying amount of the Company’s total product warranty liability for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005 were as follows (in thousands):

In the nine-months ended October 1, 2005, selling, general and administrative expenses included a $2.3 million charge related to a warranty issue that was resolved in the 2005 fourth quarter resulting in the reversal of the charge in full.

-14-

Note 9 – Employee Retirement Plans

        The Company sponsors two qualified defined benefit pension plans (“pension plans”) for certain of its employees. The following table provides disclosure of the net periodic benefit cost (in thousands):

        The Company recorded a $0.7 million pension curtailment during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006 related to discontinued operations (see Note 3, “Discontinued Operations”). The Company made contributions of $0.2 million during the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006. The Company does not anticipate making any additional contributions to the pension plans during 2006.

        The Company maintains an unfunded non-qualified supplemental retirement benefit plan for certain management employees. The following table provides disclosure of the net periodic benefit cost (in thousands):

        The Company provides postemployment benefits to certain retirees, which includes subsidized health insurance benefits for early retirees prior to their attaining age 65. The following table provides disclosure of the net periodic benefit cost (in thousands):

-15-

Note 10 – Net Income Per Share and Comprehensive Income

        Basic net income per common share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted- average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net income per common share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares and, if applicable, common stock equivalents that would arise from the exercise of stock options.

A reconciliation of the shares used in the computation of earnings per share follows (in thousands):

        For the three- and nine-months ended September 30, 2006, 129,284 options to purchase common shares were antidilutive and, accordingly, excluded from the effect of options and unvested restricted stock in the calculation of diluted EPS.

The components of comprehensive income are as follows (in thousands):

Note 11 – Business Segments

        SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,” establishes the standards for reporting information about operating segments in financial statements.  Historically the Company had two operating and reportable segments, construction equipment and agricultural equipment.  The products in the historical agricultural equipment segment included material handling equipment (skid loaders, telescopic handlers, compact excavators, compact track loaders and all-wheel-loaders) and agricultural implement products for haymaking, forage harvesting, feedmaking and manure handling.  In the first quarter of 2006, the Company re-evaluated its operating and reportable segments in connection with the discontinuation of the manufacturing and distribution of its agricultural implement business and determined that it now has only one operating and reportable segment.  Sales of material handling equipment that were previously included in the agricultural equipment segment and sales that were previously included in the construction equipment segment are now combined for both internal and external reporting purposes.

-16-

Note 12 – Financial Instruments

        The Company selectively uses interest rate swaps to reduce market risk associated with changes in interest rates. The use of derivatives is restricted to those intended for hedging purposes.

        The Company’s revolving credit facility is primarily London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) -based and is subject to interest rate changes. In order to manage interest rate exposures, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement with a financial institution to exchange variable rate interest obligations for fixed rate obligations without the exchange of the underlying principal amounts. Effective January 2006, under this agreement, the Company’s variable to fixed rate obligations are an aggregate swapped notional amount of $40 million through January 2008. The aggregate notional amount of the swap decreases to $30 million effective January 2008, $20 million effective January 2009, $10 million effective January 2010 and expires in January 2011. The Company pays a 4.89% fixed interest rate under the swap agreement and receives a 30 day LIBOR variable rate. The variable to fixed interest rate swap is designated as an effective cash-flow hedge as defined by SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS No. 133”). Accordingly, the fair value of the swap was recorded on the balance sheet, with changes in fair value included in other comprehensive (loss) income in the amount of $(0.6) million and $0.1 million, respectively, for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006. Swap gains or losses included in other comprehensive (loss) income are reclassified into earnings at the time the related interest expense is recognized or settlement of the obligation occurs.

        During the nine-months ended October 1, 2005, the Company was a party to three interest rate swap agreements. The swaps were hedges protecting against underlying changes in interest rates and their impact on the gains/losses incurred upon the sale of finance contracts receivable. Accordingly, the implied gains/losses associated with the fair values of interest rate swaps would be offset by gains/losses on the sale of the underlying retail finance contracts. Under the swaps, the Company received interest on a variable 30 day LIBOR rate and paid on a fixed rate ranging from 3.18% to 3.41%. Although the Company continued to own finance contracts during the term of the swaps, under the provisions of SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” the swaps were deemed ineffective as of April 2, 2005 as the finance contracts that were owned by the Company at the inception of the swaps had been sold during the three-month period ended April 2, 2005. As a result, the Company recorded $1.1 million of other income in the three-month period ended April 2, 2005. The Company terminated the swaps during the three-month period ended July 2, 2005 and recorded $0.7 million of other expense during such period. The Company realized a net gain of $0.4 million on these swaps for the nine-month period ended October 1, 2005.

Note 13 – Accounting Pronouncements

        In July 2006, Financial Accounting Strandards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109,” (“FIN 48”) was issued, which prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement process for recording, in the financial statements, uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. In addition, FIN 48 provides guidance on the recognition, classification, accounting in interim periods and disclosure requirements for uncertain tax positions. The Company will adopt FIN 48 effective January 1, 2007 and is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that FIN 48 will have on the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

-17-

        In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Plans and Other Postretirement Plans—an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R),” (“SFAS No. 158”) which requires employers to fully recognize the obligations associated with single-employer defined benefit pension, retiree healthcare and other postretirement plans in their financial statements.  In addition, SFAS No. 158 requires companies to measure plan assets and liabilities as of the end of a fiscal year rather than a date within 90 days of the end of the fiscal year.  The Company will adopt SFAS No. 158 effective December 31, 2006, except for the change in measurement date provisions which are not effective until 2008.  The Company is currently evaluating the impact that SFAS No. 158 will have on the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, however, based on the September 30, 2005 valuation, the Company expects that total assets, total liabilities and total shareholders’ equity will be impacted in the following manner.  Total assets are expected to decrease by approximately $0.4 million, total liabilities are expected to increase by approximately $4.8 million, and shareholders’ equity is expected to decrease by approximately $5.2 million.  These estimates are subject to change based on the September 30, 2006 valuation, when completed.  The Company is still assessing the impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 158 will have on deferred taxes and as such, the deferred tax impact has been excluded.  

Note 14 – Subsequent Event

        On October 17, 2006, Gehl Company and certain of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, (collectively the “Company”), entered into an unsecured Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with a syndicate of commercial bank lenders. Under the Credit Agreement, the Company has available a five-year $125 million revolving credit facility. In connection with its entry into the Credit Agreement, Gehl Company pledged the capital stock of the wholly-owned subsidiaries that are co-borrowers under the Credit Agreement. The Company may elect to pay interest on amounts borrowed under the Credit Agreement at a rate equal to either (1) LIBOR plus an applicable margin or (2) the prime commercial rate of interest less an applicable margin. Initially, interest under the Credit Agreement is payable at a rate of LIBOR plus .625% or the prime commercial rate less 1.125%. Amounts borrowed under the Credit Agreement on October 17, 2006 were used to repay, in full, debt outstanding under the Company’s revolving credit facility established on June 3, 2005 with the same bank group. All bank financing commitments under the June 3, 2005 agreement were cancelled, and that agreement and related ancillary agreements were terminated upon the effectiveness of the Credit Agreement and the bank group’s security interest in certain Company assets was released.

-18-

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Discontinued Operations

        During March 2006, the Company decided to discontinue the manufacturing and distribution of its agricultural implement products. The agricultural implement business included one manufacturing facility and related manufacturing machinery and equipment. The reduction in headcount totaled 140 employees, which includes both manufacturing and administrative positions related to the agricultural implement business. As a result of this action, the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes have been restated to present the results of the agricultural implement business as discontinued operations.

        The discontinuation of the agricultural implement business resulted in an after-tax charge to the Company’s earnings for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006 of $7.8 million, or $0.62 per diluted share. The after-tax charge reflects a reduction from the previous estimate of $9.0 million, or $.73 per diluted share, due to higher than expected proceeds from the sale of machinery and equipment associated with the discontinued operations. The after-tax charge is comprised of non-cash asset impairment charges of $5.9 million related to agricultural implement field and factory inventory and certain property, plant and equipment, and cash charges related to severance and other employee termination costs of $1.9 million. The Company does not anticipate additional charges during the fourth quarter of 2006.

        The Company has reflected the results of its agricultural implements business as discontinued operations in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and prior periods have been restated. Summary results of operations for the agricultural implements business were as follows (in thousands):

        The assets of the agricultural implements business are reflected as net assets of discontinued operations in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and were as follows (in thousands):

-19-

Business Segments

        SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,” establishes the standards for reporting information about operating segments in financial statements.  Historically the Company had two operating and reportable segments, construction equipment and agricultural equipment.  The products in the historical agricultural equipment segment included material handling equipment (skid loaders, telescopic handlers, compact excavators, compact track loaders and all-wheel-loaders) and agricultural implement products for haymaking, forage harvesting, feedmaking and manure handling.  In the first quarter of 2006, the Company re-evaluated its operating and reportable segments in connection with the discontinuation of the manufacturing and distribution of its agricultural implement business and determined that it now has only one operating and reportable segment.  Sales of material handling equipment that were previously included in the agricultural equipment segment and sales that were previously included in the construction equipment segment are now combined for both internal and external reporting purposes.

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended September 30, 2006 Compared to Three Months Ended October 1, 2005

Net Sales

        Net sales in the three months ended September 30, 2006 (“2006 third quarter”) were $121.0 million compared to $107.3 million in the three months ended October 1, 2005 (“2005 third quarter”), an increase of $13.7 million, or 13%. Net sales, in general, were favorably impacted by the solid fundamentals of the Company’s global markets during the 2006 third quarter. Sales of the Company’s telescopic handlers, skid loaders and compact excavators during the 2006 third quarter increased 33%, 15% and 21%, respectively, from the 2005 third quarter. These sales increases were partially offset by a 10% reduction in compact track loader shipments in the 2006 third quarter. Price increases during 2005 and 2006 accounted for approximately 2.6 percentage points of the net sales increase.

        Of the Company’s total net sales reported for the 2006 third quarter, $23.4 million were made to customers residing outside of the United States compared with $18.6 million in the 2005 third quarter. The increase in export sales was primarily due to increased sales in Europe.

Gross Profit

        Gross profit was $26.4 million in the 2006 third quarter compared to $22.1 million in the 2005 third quarter, an increase of $4.2 million, or 19%. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales (“gross margin”) was 21.8% in the 2006 third quarter compared to 20.6% in the 2005 third quarter. Gross margin in the 2006 third quarter was favorably impacted by approximately 1.8 percentage points due to 2005 and 2006 price increases. The favorable impact of these price increases were partially offset by the impact of changes in product mix and increases in the cost of steel and component parts (approximately 0.6 percentage points).

-20-

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

        Selling, general and administrative expenses were $14.3 million, or 11.8% of net sales, in the 2006 third quarter compared to $12.7 million, or 11.8% of net sales, in the 2005 third quarter. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses in the 2006 third quarter over the 2005 third quarter was due to increased expenses related to items that vary with sales levels, compensation expense related to stock-based awards recorded in the period due to the adoption of FASB Statement No. 123R in 2006 and higher employment levels in 2006 compared to 2005.

Income from Operations

        Income from operations in the 2006 third quarter was $12.1 million, or 10.0% of net sales, compared to income from operations of $9.4 million, or 8.8% of net sales, in the 2005 third quarter, an increase of $2.6 million, or 28%.

Interest Expense

        Interest expense was $0.8 million in the 2006 third quarter compared to $1.4 million in the 2005 third quarter, a decrease of $0.6 million. The decrease in interest expense was due to a decrease in the average outstanding debt during the 2006 third quarter compared to the 2005 third quarter (see “Financial Condition” below for discussion of changes in outstanding debt).

Interest Income

        Interest income was $1.0 million in the 2006 third quarter and in the 2005 third quarter. The favorable impact of increased interest rates was offset by a decreased average balance of finance contracts receivable in the 2006 third quarter compared to the 2005 third quarter. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below for discussion of the changes in the balance of finance contract receivable.

Net Other Expense

        The Company recorded net other expense of $1.0 million and $0.5 million in the 2006 third quarter and 2005 third quarter, respectively. The increase in other expense was primarily due to an increase in the loss on the sale of finance contracts receivable as finance contract volume increased from the 2005 period.

Income from Continuing Operations

        Income from continuing operations in the 2006 third quarter was $7.4 million, or 6.1% of net sales, compared to income from continuing operations of $5.7 million, or 5.3% of net sales, in the 2005 third quarter, an increase of $1.7 million, or 30%.

Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax

        The Company recorded a loss from discontinued operations, net of tax of $309,000 in the 2006 third quarter compared to a loss from discontinued operations, net of tax of $594,000 in the 2005 third quarter.

-21-

Loss on Disposal of Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax

        The Company recorded $1.3 million of income on the disposal of discontinued operations, net of tax in the 2006 third quarter. See “Discontinued Operations” above for additional discussion.

Net Income

        The Company recorded net income in the 2006 third quarter of $8.3 million compared to net income of $5.1 million in the 2005 third quarter. The 2006 third quarter net income included a $1.3 million gain on disposal of discontinued operations as noted above.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 Compared to Nine Months Ended October 1, 2005

Net Sales

        Net sales in the nine months ended September 30, 2006 (“2006 nine months”) were $382.6 million compared to $344.5 million in the nine months ended October 1, 2005 (“2005 nine months”), an increase of $38.1 million, or 11%. Net sales, in general, were favorably impacted by the strength of the Company’s global markets. Sales of the Company’s telescopic handlers, skid loaders and compact track loaders increased 40%, 6% and 4%, respectively, in the 2006 nine months compared to the 2005 nine months. The Company’s attachment subsidiary, CE Attachments, Inc., increased sales 13% from 2005. These increases in net sales were partially offset by a 6% reduction in sales of compact excavators during the 2006 nine months as increased competitive pricing pressure adversely impacted sales in the 2006 first quarter. The Company increased sales incentives on compact excavators during the second quarter of 2006 resulting in a third quarter increase in sales of 21% as discussed above. Price increases during 2005 and 2006 accounted for approximately 2.3 percentage points of the net sales increase in the 2006 nine months.

        Of the Company’s total net sales reported for the 2006 nine months, $76.3 million were made to customers residing outside of the United States compared with $55.8 million in the 2005 nine months. The increase in export sales was primarily due to increased sales in Europe.

Gross Profit

        Gross profit was $82.7 million in the 2006 nine months compared to $71.9 million in the 2005 nine months, an increase of $10.9 million, or 15%. Gross margin was 21.6% in the 2006 nine months compared to 20.9% in the 2005 nine months. Gross margin in the 2006 nine months was favorably impacted by approximately 1.7 percentage points due to 2005 and 2006 price increases. The favorable impact of these price increases were partially offset by sales incentives paid on increased retail settlement activity in the 2006 nine months compared to the 2005 nine months (approximately 0.3 percentage points) as well as the impact of changes in product mix and increases in the cost of component parts (approximately 0.7 percentage points).

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

        Selling, general and administrative expenses were $44.5 million, or 11.6% of net sales, in the 2006 nine months compared to $42.5 million, or 12.3% of net sales, in the 2005 nine months. Selling, general and administrative expenses in the 2005 nine months included a $2.3 million, or 1.0% of net sales, charge related to a warranty issue that was resolved in the 2005 fourth quarter resulting in the reversal of the charge in full. Offsetting the impact of the $2.3 million warranty charge on the 2005 nine months expense, other selling, general and administrative expenses increased $4.3 million, primarily due to items that vary with sales levels, compensation expense related to stock-based awards recorded in the period due to the adoption of FASB Statement No. 123R in 2006 and higher employment levels in the 2006 nine months, resulting in a new $2.0 million increase in selling, general and administrative expenses between periods.

-22-

Income from Operations

        Income from operations in the 2006 nine months was $38.2 million, or 10.0% of net sales, compared to income from operations of $29.4 million, or 8.5% of net sales, in the 2005 nine months, an increase of $8.8 million, or 30%. The 2005 nine months income from continuing operations includes the previously discussed warranty charge of $2.3 million, or 1.0% of net sales.

Interest Expense

        Interest expense was $2.8 million in the 2006 nine months compared to $4.4 million in the 2005 nine months, a decrease of $1.7 million. The decrease in interest expense was due to a decrease in the average outstanding debt during the 2006 nine months compared to the 2005 nine months (see “Financial Condition” below for discussion of changes in outstanding debt).

Interest Income

        Interest income was $3.0 million in the 2006 nine months compared to $3.2 million in the 2005 nine months, a decrease of $0.2 million. This decrease was primarily due to the decrease in average finance contract receivables in the 2006 nine months compared to the 2005 nine months.

Net Other Expense

        The Company recorded net other expense of $3.1 million and $3.3 million in the 2006 nine months and 2005 nine months, respectively. The change in net other expense was primarily due to a $0.8 million reduction in securitization implementation costs in the 2006 nine months and approximately $0.9 million in foreign currency gains in the 2006 nine months compared to $0.2 million in foreign currency losses in the 2005 nine months. These gains were offset, in part, by an increase in the loss on sale of finance contracts receivable of $1.0 million and a $0.4 million gain on interest rate swap contracts that were in place during the 2005 nine months.

Income from Continuing Operations

        Income from continuing operations in the 2006 nine months was $23.1 million, or 6.0% of net sales, compared to income from continuing operations of $16.4 million, or 4.8% of net sales, in the 2005 nine months, an increase of $6.8 million, or 41%. The 2005 nine months income from continuing operations includes the previously discussed after-tax warranty charge of $1.5 million, or 0.4% of net sales.

Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax

        The Company recorded a loss from discontinued operations, net of tax of $388,000 in the 2006 nine months compared to a loss from discontinued operations, net of tax of $784,000 in the 2005 nine months.

-23-

Loss on Disposal of Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax

        The Company recorded a $7.8 million loss on the disposal of discontinued operations, net of tax in the 2006 nine months. See “Discontinued Operations” above for additional discussion.

Net Income

        The Company recorded net income in the 2006 nine months of $15.0 million compared to net income of $15.6 million in the 2005 nine months. The 2006 nine months net income included a $7.8 million loss on disposal of discontinued operations noted above. The 2005 nine months income from continuing operations includes the previously discussed after-tax warranty charge of $1.5 million, or 0.4% of net sales.

Financial Condition

Working Capital

        The Company’s working capital was $225.0 million at September 30, 2006 as compared to $212.6 million at December 31, 2005 and $215.6 million at October 1, 2005. The change in working capital at September 30, 2006 from December 31, 2005 was primarily due to increases in accounts receivable and inventory offset, in part, by a reduction in finance contracts receivable and discontinued operations net assets as well as an increase in accounts payable. Accounts receivable and inventory increased from December 31, 2005 primarily due to increased sales to meet rising product demand during the 2006 nine months. Finance contracts receivable decreased from December 31, 2005 due to the timing of the sale of contracts through the Company’s asset securitization facility. Discontinued operations net assets decreased from December 31, 2005 due to the decline in production and sales of agricultural implements as well as the recording of the asset impairment charge associated with the discontinued operations during the 2006 first quarter. The increase in accounts payable was due to increased production resulting from strong sales as well as the timing of payments resulting from a change in the mix of vendors.

        The change in working capital at September 30, 2006 from October 1, 2005 was primarily due to an increase in accounts receivable and inventories, offset in part, by a decrease in finance contracts receivable and discontinued operations net assets, as well as an increase in accounts payable. Accounts receivable increased primarily due to strong sales from October 1, 2005. Finance contracts receivable decreased from October 1, 2005 due to the timing of the sale of contracts through the Company’s asset securitization facility. Discontinued operations net assets decreased from October 31, 2005 due to the decline in production and sales of agricultural implements as well as the recording of the asset impairment charge associated with the discontinued operations during the 2006 first quarter. The increase in accounts payable was due to increased production resulting from strong sales as well as the timing of payments resulting from a change in the mix of vendors.

Capital Expenditures

        Capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment during the 2006 nine months were approximately $4.0 million. On May 1, 2006, the Company announced a $6.5 million expansion of its Yankton, South Dakota telescopic handler production facility. The project includes a 30,000 square foot expansion of the facility as well as further investment in technological production enhancements, including increased laser cutting, robotics and a new paint system. The project is expected to be completed in January 2007 and will increase telescopic handler production capacity by approximately 50% from 2006 second quarter levels. In addition to the expansion of the Yankton, South Dakota facility, the Company plans to make an additional $5.0 million of capital expenditures in 2006, primarily to enhance manufacturing and information technology capabilities and maintain and upgrade machinery and equipment. The Company believes its present Yankton, South Dakota facility will operate near full capacity up to the completion of the previously discussed expansion in January 2007.

-24-

Debt and Equity

        As of September 30, 2006, the Company maintains a $125 million revolving credit facility (the “Facility”) with a syndicate of commercial bank lenders. The credit commitment under the Facility was for a five-year period expiring June 3, 2010. At any time during the term of the Facility, the Company had the option to request an increase in the credit commitment under the Facility to $175 million from the current syndicate of commercial bank lenders or any other commercial bank lender(s) selected by the Company. Borrowings under the Facility were secured by the Company’s accounts receivable, inventory and the capital stock of certain wholly-owned subsidiaries. The Company had the right to borrow up to $25 million under the Facility in a currency other than the U.S. Dollar. The Company could elect to pay interest on U.S. Dollar borrowings under the Facility at a rate of either (1) the 30 day LIBOR plus 0.75% to 1.50% or (2) a base rate defined as the prime commercial rate less 0.0% to 1.0%. The Company’s actual borrowing costs for LIBOR or base rate borrowings was determined by reference to a pricing grid based on the Company’s ratio of funded debt to total capitalization. Interest on amounts borrowed under the Facility in currencies other than the U.S. Dollar were priced at a rate equal to LIBOR plus 0.75% to 1.50%. As of September 30, 2006, the weighted average interest rate on Company borrowings outstanding under the Facility was 5.94%. On October 17, 2006, the Company entered into a new $125 million unsecured credit agreement. Borrowings under the new credit agreement were used to pay off, in full, borrowings under the Facility and the Facility was terminated. See “Note 14 Subsequent Event” for additional discussion.

        The Facility required the Company to maintain compliance with certain financial covenants related to total capitalization, interest expense coverage, tangible net worth, capital expenditures and operating lease spending. The Company was in compliance with all covenants as of September 30, 2006.

        Borrowings under the Facility were $49.8 million, $51.5 million and $62.6 million at September 30, 2006, December 31, 2005 and October 1, 2005, respectively. Available unused borrowings under the Facility were $75.2 million, $73.5 million and $62.4 million at September 30, 2006, December 31, 2005 and October 1, 2005, respectively.

        In October 2005, the Company entered into a $15 million committed line of credit facility with a commercial bank lender. The facility was amended during July 2006 reducing the commited line of credit to $10 million. Borrowings under this facility bear interest at 1.15% above the LIBOR for 30 day deposits, reset monthly, and are secured by a first priority lien on an assigned pool of retail finance contracts receivable. This facility expires on April 30, 2007. There were no borrowings outstanding under this facility at September 30, 2006.

        In addition, the Company has access to a €2.5 million committed foreign short-term credit facility. Borrowings of €1.0 million were outstanding at a weighted average interest rate of 4.60% at September 30, 2006.

        The Company believes it has adequate capital resources and borrowing capacity to meet its projected capital requirements for the foreseeable future. Requirements for working capital, capital expenditures, pension fund contributions and debt maturities in fiscal 2006 will continue to be funded by operations and the Company’s borrowing arrangements.

-25-

        At September 30, 2006, shareholders’ equity had increased $26.6 million to $226.9 million from $200.3 at October 1, 2005. This increase primarily reflects net income of $21.2 million and $1.5 million related to the exercise of stock options.

        In September 2001, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase plan providing for the repurchase of up to 500,000 shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock. No shares were repurchased under this authorization during the 2006 nine months or 2005 nine months. As of September 30, 2006, the Company has repurchased an aggregate of 227,850 shares under this authorization. All treasury stock acquired by the Company has been cancelled and returned to the status of authorized but unissued shares.

Contractual Obligations

        Other than the changes in the outstanding borrowings and capital commitments, as described above, there have been no material changes to the annual maturities of debt obligations, future minimum, non-cancelable operating lease payments and capital commitments as disclosed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Notes 6 and 14 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements — Sales of Finance Contracts Receivable

        The sale of finance contracts is an important component of the Company’s overall liquidity. In March 2006, the Company entered into an asset securitization facility (“the Securitization Facility”) with a financial institution (the “Purchaser”) whereby the Company can sell, through a revolving securitization facility, up to $300 million of retail and fleet installment sale contracts (“installment sale contracts” or “finance contracts receivable”). The Securitization Facility has a final maturity date in March 2009, subject to annual renewal by the Purchaser. Under the Securitization Facility, the Company sells portfolios of its finance contracts receivable to a wholly-owned, bankruptcy-remote special purpose subsidiary (“SPE”) which, in turn, sells each such portfolio to a wholly-owned bankruptcy-remote special purpose subsidiary of the SPE. The wholly-owned bankruptcy-remote special purpose subsidiary of the SPE sells a participating interest in each such portfolio of finance contracts receivable to the Purchaser (approximately 90% of the discounted value of the finance contract receivable portfolio). The Purchaser has no recourse against the Company for uncollectible finance contracts receivable, if any; however, the Company’s retained interest in the portfolio of finance contracts receivable is subordinate to the Purchaser’s interest. The Securitization Facility replaced the previous $150 million revolving securitization facility the Company terminated in February 2006. The participating interest in finance contracts receivable that had been sold under the previous securitization facility was purchased by Purchaser in March 2006. At September 2006, the Company had available unused capacity of $129.1 million under the Securitization Facility.

        In addition to the Securitization Facility, the Company has arrangements with multiple financial institutions to sell its finance contracts receivable with 5% limited recourse on the sold portfolio of retail finance contracts. Prior to 2005, the Company sold certain finance contracts receivable to various financial institutions on a full recourse basis. The Company continues to service substantially all contracts, whether or not sold. At September 30, 2006, the Company serviced $336.3 million of sold finance contracts receivable of which $207.4 million, $85.8 million and $43.2 million were sold through the Securitization Facility, limited recourse arrangements and full recourse arrangements, respectively. It is the intention of the Company to continue to sell substantially all of its existing as well as future finance contracts receivable through an asset securitization program or limited recourse arrangements. The Company believes that it will be able to arrange sufficient capacity to sell its finance contracts for the foreseeable future.

-26-

Accounting Pronouncements

        In July 2006, Financial Accounting Strandards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109,” (“FIN 48”) was issued, which prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement process for recording, in the financial statements, uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. In addition, FIN 48 provides guidance on the recognition, classification, accounting in interim periods and disclosure requirements for uncertain tax positions. The Company will adopt FIN 48 effective January 1, 2007 and is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that FIN 48 will have on the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

        In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Plans and Other Postretirement Plans—an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R),” (“SFAS No. 158”) which requires employers to fully recognize the obligations associated with single-employer defined benefit pension, retiree healthcare and other postretirement plans in their financial statements.  In addition, SFAS No. 158 requires companies to measure plan assets and liabilities as of the end of a fiscal year rather than a date within 90 days of the end of the fiscal year.  The Company will adopt SFAS No. 158 effective December 31, 2006, except for the change in measurement date provisions which are not effective until 2008.  The Company is currently evaluating the impact that SFAS No. 158 will have on the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, however, based on the September 30, 2005 valuation, the Company expects that total assets, total liabilities and total shareholders’ equity will be impacted in the following manner.  Total assets are expected to decrease by approximately $0.4 million, total liabilities are expected to increase by approximately $4.8 million, and shareholders’ equity is expected to decrease by approximately $5.2 million.  These estimates are subject to change based on the September 30, 2006 valuation, when completed.  The Company is still assessing the impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 158 will have on deferred taxes and as such, the deferred tax impact has been excluded.  

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

        The preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, net sales and expenses. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions and materially impact the carrying value of the assets and liabilities. The Company believes the following accounting policies are critical to the Company’s business operations and the understanding of the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

-27-

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

        The Company’s accounts receivable are reduced by an allowance for amounts that may be uncollectible in the future. In circumstances where the Company is aware of a specific customer’s inability to meet its financial obligations, a specific reserve for bad debts is recorded against the accounts receivable balance to reduce the amount due to the net amount reasonably expected to be collected. Additionally, a general percentage of past due receivables is reserved, based on the Company’s past experience of collectibility. If circumstances change (i.e., higher than expected defaults or an unexpected material adverse change in a major customer’s ability to meet its financial obligations), estimates of the recoverability of amounts due could be reduced by a material amount.

Inventories

        Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market value. Cost is determined using the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method for the majority of the Company’s inventories. In valuing inventory, management is required to make assumptions regarding the level of reserves required to value potentially obsolete or slow moving items to the lower of cost or market value. Inventory reserves are established taking into account inventory age and frequency of use or sale. While calculations are made involving these factors, significant management judgment regarding expectations for future events is involved. Future events that could significantly influence management’s judgment and related estimates include general economic conditions in markets where the Company’s products are sold, as well as new products and design changes introduced by the Company.

Accrued Warranty

        The Company establishes reserves related to the warranties provided on its products. Specific reserves are maintained for programs related to known machine safety and reliability issues. When establishing specific reserves, estimates are made regarding the size of the population, the type of program, costs to be incurred and estimated participation. Additionally, general reserves are maintained based on the historical percentage relationships of warranty costs to machine sales and applied to current equipment sales. If these estimates and related assumptions change, reserve levels may require adjustment.

Accrued Product Liability

        The Company records a general reserve for potential product liability claims based on the Company’s prior claim experience and specific reserves for known product liability claims. Specific reserves for known claims are valued based upon the Company’s prior claims experience, including consideration of the jurisdiction, circumstances of the accident, type of loss or injury, identity of plaintiff, other potential responsible parties, analysis of outside counsel, and analysis of internal product liability counsel. Actual product liability costs could be different due to a number of variables, including decisions of juries or judges.

Goodwill Impairment

        In connection with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” the Company is required to perform goodwill impairment reviews, at least annually, using a fair-value-based approach. The Company performs its annual impairment review as of December 31. As part of the annual impairment review, an estimate of the fair value of the Company, primarily by using a discounted cash flow analysis, is performed. Significant assumptions used in this analysis include: expected future revenue growth rates, operating profit margins, working capital levels and a weighted average cost of capital. Changes in assumptions could significantly impact the estimate of the fair value of the Company, which could result in a goodwill impairment charge and could have a significant impact on the consolidated financial statements.

-28-

Pension and Postretirement Benefits

        Pension and postretirement benefit costs and obligations are dependent on assumptions used in calculation of these amounts. These assumptions, used by actuaries, include discount rates, expected return on plan assets for funded plans, rate of salary increases, health care cost trend rates, mortality rates and other factors. In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, actual results that differ from the actuarial assumptions are accumulated and amortized to future periods and therefore affect recognized expense and recorded obligations in future periods. While the Company believes that the assumptions used are appropriate, differences in actual experience or changes in assumptions may materially effect its financial position or results of operations.

-29-

Forward-Looking Statements

        Certain statements included in this filing are “forward-looking statements” intended to qualify for the safe harbor from liability established by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements. When used in this filing, words such as the Company “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects”, “estimates” or “projects” or words of similar meaning are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors, some of which are beyond the Company’s control, that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated as of the date of this filing. Factors that could cause such a variance include, but are not limited to, those risk factors cited in Part II, Item 1A of this filing, any adverse change in general economic conditions, unanticipated changes in capital market conditions, the Company’s ability to implement successfully its strategic initiatives (including cost reduction initiatives), unanticipated expenses associated with the discontinuance of the Company’s agricultural implement lines, market acceptance of newly introduced products, unexpected issues related to the pricing and availability of raw materials (including steel) and component parts, unanticipated difficulties in securing product from third party manufacturing sources, the ability of the Company to increase its prices to reflect higher prices for raw materials and component parts, the cyclical nature of the Company’s business, the Company’s and its customers’ access to credit, competitive pricing, product initiatives and other actions taken by competitors, disruptions in production capacity, excess inventory levels, the effect of changes in laws and regulations (including government subsidies and international trade regulations), technological difficulties, changes in currency exchange rates or interest rates, the Company’s ability to secure sources of liquidity necessary to fund its operations, changes in environmental laws, the impact of any strategic transactions effected by the Company, and employee and labor relations. Shareholders, potential investors, and other readers are urged to consider these factors in evaluating the forward-looking statements and are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements included in this filing are only made as of the date of this filing, and the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update such forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances. In addition, the Company’s expectations for 2006 are based in part on certain assumptions made by the Company, including those relating to commodities prices, which are strongly affected by weather and other factors and can fluctuate significantly, housing starts and other construction activities, which are sensitive to, among other things, interest rates and government spending, and the performance of the U.S. economy generally. The accuracy of these or other assumptions could have a material effect on the Company’s ability to achieve its expectations.

-30-

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

        There are no material changes to the information provided in response to this item as set forth in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

        The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s principal executive officer and its principal financial officer, has evaluated the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2006. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s principal executive officer and its principal financial officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2006.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

        There was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the three months ended September 30, 2006, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

-31-

PART II – Other Information

Item 1A. Risk Factors

        You should carefully consider each of the risks described below, together with all of the other information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, before making an investment decision with respect to our securities. If any of the following risks develop into actual events, our business, financial condition or results from operations could be materially and adversely affected and you may lose all or part of your investment.

We operate in cyclical industries, which could adversely affect our growth and results of operations.

        Our business depends upon general activity levels in the construction and agricultural industries. Historically, these industries have been cyclical. As a result, our operating profits are susceptible to a number of industry-specific factors, including:

        As a result of these and other factors, including related effects on us and our customers’ access to and cost of credit and dealer inventory management, a downturn in demand for our products can occur suddenly, resulting in excess inventories, under-utilized production capacity and reduced sales prices for our products. These downturns may be prolonged and may result in lower net sales and earnings. Equipment manufacturers, including us, have responded to downturns in the past by reducing production and discounting product prices. These actions have resulted in restructuring charges and lower earnings for us in past affected periods. In the event of future downturns, we may take similar actions.

-32-

Our dependence on, and the price and availability of, raw materials and component parts may adversely affect our profits.

        We are exposed to fluctuations in market prices for commodities, such as steel and rubber, as well as component parts, including engines. In recent years, the prices of various raw materials and component parts have increased significantly, and we have been unable to avoid exposure to global price fluctuations and supply limitations, such as occurred in 2004 and 2005 with the cost and availability of steel and related products. In addition, our products are designed to work with particular components. As a result, our products, in certain cases, rely on a single source of supply for certain components. If we are unable to purchase the raw materials and components we require or are unable to pass on price increases to our customers, our future profitability may be adversely affected.

The construction and agricultural industries in which we operate are competitive, and competitors’ offerings of new products or services or lower prices could result in a decrease in our net sales and earnings.

        We compete with global full-line suppliers (including Caterpillar Inc., Deere & Company, Case Construction Equipment and Komatsu Ltd.) with a presence in every market and a broad range of products as well as with product line specialists (including JLG Industries, Inc., Ingersoll-Rand Company (Bobcat) and Takeuchi Mfg. Co. Ltd.). Some of our competitors are larger than us and have greater financial, manufacturing, marketing and distribution resources. Competitive pricing, product initiatives and other actions taken by our competitors could cause us to lose customers or force us to decrease our sales prices, resulting in lower net sales and earnings.

We source some of our products from third parties and any interruption in the supply of these products could adversely affect our net sales and profitability.

        We source compact excavators and compact track loaders from third-party foreign suppliers. Any interruption in the supply of these products or any material increase in prices could adversely affect our net sales and profitability. We are exposed to foreign currency risk with respect to the prices of these products. Any material change in the value of the United States dollar versus other currencies could adversely impact our net sales and profitability.

Our success depends in part on the introduction of new products, and the failure to introduce new products on a timely basis could adversely affect our net sales and profitability.

        Our long-term results depend upon our ability to secure, introduce and market new products successfully. Our success in this area will depend on a number of factors, including our ability to develop new products internally or source new products from third-party suppliers, product quality, competition, customer acceptance of new products and the strength of our dealer networks. Any difficulties in developing or identifying and sourcing new products, any manufacturing delays or problems with new product launches, or any increased warranty costs from new products could adversely affect our operating results. The introduction of new products could also result in a decrease in revenues from our existing products. The internal development and refinement of products also consumes a substantial amount of capital. We may need more capital for product development and refinement than is available to us, which could adversely affect our net sales and profitability.

-33-

Cyclical and structural declines in the demand for products we offer may cause us to undertake product line and facility rationalization initiatives that could result in restructuring charges and lower netsales and earnings.

        The construction and agricultural industries are continually evolving and undergoing cyclical and structural changes that impact the demand for the products we offer. We have historically reviewed these cyclical and structural changes in demand and have taken action to rationalize our product offerings and production facilities in light of market conditions. We expect to continue these reviews and to take appropriate action based on future conditions. Those actions could result in restructuring charges and lower net sales and earnings.

        During March 2006, we decided to discontinue the manufacturing and distribution of our agricultural implement products. As a result, we have recorded a $5.9 million after-tax non-cash impairment charge related to agricultural implement field and factory inventory and certain property, plant and equipment and a $1.9 million after-tax cash charge related to severance and other termination costs. See “Part I, Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Discontinued Operations.” If we incur additional unanticipated expenses associated with the discontinuation of our implement business, then our net income could be adversely affected in future periods.

Our leverage could adversely affect our financial health and make us vulnerable to adverse economic and industry conditions.

        At times, we may incur indebtedness that is substantial relative to our shareholders’ equity. Our indebtedness has important consequences. For example, it could:

        In addition, our credit facility requires us to maintain specified financial ratios and satisfy certain financial condition tests, which may require that we take action to reduce our debt or to act in a manner contrary to our long-term business objectives.

-34-

We are subject to risks and associated changes in the business climate that could limit our access to capital.

        Our business is capital intensive and the fulfillment of our strategic plan depends, at least in part, upon our ability to access capital at attractive rates and terms. If access to capital becomes significantly constrained because of changes in the business climate or other factors, then our results of operations and financial condition could be significantly adversely affected.

We are subject to significant environmental, health and safety laws and regulations and related compliance expenditures and liabilities.

        We are subject to various laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment and human health and safety and have incurred and will continue to incur capital and other expenditures to comply with these regulations. If we fail to comply with any environmental regulations, then we could be subject to future liabilities, fines or penalties or the suspension of production at our manufacturing facilities. If unexpected obligations at these or other sites or more stringent environmental laws are imposed in the future, our future profitability may be adversely affected.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

        In September 2001, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase plan providing for the repurchase of up to 500,000 shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock in open market or privately negotiated transactions. The plan does not have an expiration date. No shares were repurchased under the plan during the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006. As of September 30, 2006, the Company had authority to repurchase 272,150 shares under the plan.

Item 6. Exhibits

-35-

SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

-36-

GEHL COMPANY

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

-37-