10-Q 1 k47826e10vq.htm FORM 10-Q e10vq
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
     
þ   Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
or
     
o   Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from                      to                      
Commission file Number 001-33063
CITIZENS REPUBLIC BANCORP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
MICHIGAN   38-2378932
     
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
     
328 S. Saginaw St., Flint, Michigan   48502
     
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)
(810) 766-7500
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days
þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
o Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (check one):
             
Large accelerated filer o   Accelerated filer þ   Non-accelerated filer o   Smaller reporting company o
        (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
o Yes þ No
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
     
Class   Outstanding at May 1, 2009
     
Common Stock, No Par Value   126,298,743 Shares
 
 

 


 

Citizens Republic Bancorp, Inc.
Index to Form 10-Q
         
    Page  
       
 
       
       
    3  
    4  
    5  
    6  
    7  
 
       
    25  
 
       
    44  
 
       
    44  
 
       
       
 
       
    45  
 
       
    46  
 
       
    46  
 
       
    47  
 
       
    48  
 EX-10.52
 EX-10.53
 EX-31.1
 EX-31.2
 EX-32.1

2


Table of Contents

Consolidated Balance Sheet
Citizens Republic Bancorp and Subsidiaries
                         
    March 31,     December 31,     March 31,  
(in thousands)   2009     2008     2008  
 
    (unaudited)     (Note 1)     (unaudited)  
Assets
                       
Cash and due from banks
  $ 163,456     $ 171,695     $ 222,677  
Money market investments:
                       
Federal funds sold
                20,000  
Interest-bearing deposits with banks
    481,489       214,925       2,488  
 
                 
Total money market investments
    481,489       214,925       22,488  
Investment Securities:
                       
Securities available for sale, at fair value
    2,271,998       2,248,772       2,085,867  
Securities held to maturity, at amortized cost (fair value of $138,840, $137,846 and $134,233, respectively)
    138,581       138,575       132,905  
 
                 
Total investment securities
    2,410,579       2,387,347       2,218,772  
FHLB and Federal Reserve stock
    148,764       148,764       148,838  
Portfolio loans:
                       
Commercial and industrial
    2,394,436       2,602,334       2,653,799  
Commercial real estate
    2,944,265       2,964,721       3,174,384  
 
                 
Total commercial
    5,338,701       5,567,055       5,828,183  
Residential mortgage
    1,207,973       1,262,841       1,393,801  
Direct consumer
    1,405,659       1,452,166       1,531,905  
Indirect consumer
    802,116       820,536       818,901  
 
                 
Total portfolio loans
    8,754,449       9,102,598       9,572,790  
Less: Allowance for loan losses
    (282,647 )     (255,321 )     (176,528 )
 
                 
Net portfolio loans
    8,471,802       8,847,277       9,396,262  
Loans held for sale
    89,820       91,362       81,537  
Premises and equipment
    122,810       124,217       127,329  
Goodwill
    597,218       597,218       775,308  
Other intangible assets
    19,377       21,414       28,099  
Bank owned life insurance
    218,917       218,333       216,336  
Other assets
    258,058       263,464       301,645  
 
                 
Total assets
  $ 12,982,290     $ 13,086,016     $ 13,539,291  
 
                 
Liabilities
                       
Noninterest-bearing deposits
  $ 1,174,392     $ 1,143,294     $ 1,113,773  
Interest-bearing demand deposits
    865,441       780,176       751,130  
Savings deposits
    2,683,425       2,504,320       2,592,214  
Time deposits
    4,396,266       4,624,616       4,029,860  
 
                 
Total deposits
    9,119,524       9,052,406       8,486,977  
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase
    53,086       65,015       503,430  
Other short-term borrowings
    13,845       10,377       36,859  
Other liabilities
    163,887       164,274       136,193  
Long-term debt
    2,064,575       2,192,623       2,798,802  
 
                 
Total liabilities
    11,414,917       11,484,695       11,962,261  
Shareholders’ Equity
                       
Preferred stock — no par value Authorized - 5,000,000 shares; Issued and outstanding - 300,000 at 3/31/09 and 12/31/08, redemption value of $300 million
    267,566       266,088        
Common stock — no par value Authorized - 150,000,000 shares; Issued and outstanding - 126,298,743 at 3/31/09, 125,996,938 at 12/31/08, and 75,747,627 at 3/31/08
    1,214,173       1,214,469       976,445  
Retained earnings
    121,106       170,358       586,502  
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
    (35,472 )     (49,594 )     14,083  
 
                 
Total shareholders’ equity
    1,567,373       1,601,321       1,577,030  
 
                 
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  $ 12,982,290     $ 13,086,016     $ 13,539,291  
 
                 
See notes to consolidated financial statements.

3


Table of Contents

Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
Citizens Republic Bancorp and Subsidiaries
                 
    Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
(in thousands, except per share amounts)   2009     2008  
 
Interest Income
               
Interest and fees on loans
  $ 119,191     $ 157,001  
Interest and dividends on investment securities:
               
Taxable
    21,912       21,023  
Tax-exempt
    6,957       7,370  
Dividends on FHLB and Federal Reserve stock
    1,366       1,693  
Money market investments
    263       30  
 
           
Total interest income
    149,689       187,117  
 
           
Interest Expense
               
Deposits
    47,140       61,578  
Short-term borrowings
    67       4,971  
Long-term debt
    25,536       32,256  
 
           
Total interest expense
    72,743       98,805  
 
           
Net Interest Income
    76,946       88,312  
Provision for loan losses
    64,017       30,619  
 
           
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
    12,929       57,693  
 
           
 
               
Noninterest Income
               
Service charges on deposit accounts
    10,268       11,466  
Trust fees
    3,419       4,784  
Mortgage and other loan income
    3,079       3,344  
Brokerage and investment fees
    1,327       1,916  
ATM network user fees
    1,454       1,413  
Bankcard fees
    1,894       1,744  
Gains (losses) on loans held for sale
    (6,152 )     1  
Other income
    3,944       6,257  
 
           
Total noninterest income
    19,233       30,925  
 
               
Noninterest Expense
               
Salaries and employee benefits
    33,917       42,225  
Occupancy
    7,923       7,675  
Professional services
    3,136       3,763  
Equipment
    2,850       3,230  
Data processing services
    4,274       4,304  
Advertising and public relations
    1,425       1,838  
Postage and delivery
    1,575       1,727  
Other loan expenses
    5,937       1,811  
Other real estate (ORE) expenses
    8,360       1,242  
Intangible asset amortization
    2,037       2,447  
Other expense
    9,344       6,300  
 
           
Total noninterest expense
    80,778       76,562  
 
           
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes
    (48,616 )     12,056  
Income tax provision (benefit)
    (3,467 )     929  
 
           
Net Income (Loss)
    (45,149 )     11,127  
Dividend on redeemable preferred stock
    (4,103 )      
 
           
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Shareholders
  $ (49,252 )   $ 11,127  
 
           
 
               
Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share:
               
Basic
  $ (0.39 )   $ 0.15  
Diluted
    (0.39 )     0.15  
Cash Dividends Declared Per Common Share
          0.29  
 
Average Common Shares Outstanding:
               
Basic
    125,400       75,248  
Diluted
    125,400       75,273  
See notes to consolidated financial statements.

4


Table of Contents

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity
Citizens Republic Bancorp and Subsidiaries
                                                 
                                    Accumulated        
                                    Other        
    Preferred     Common Stock     Retained     Comprehensive        
(in thousands, except per share amounts)   Stock     Shares     Amount     Earnings     Income (Loss)     Total  
Balance at December 31, 2008
  $ 266,088       125,997     $ 1,214,469     $ 170,358     $ (49,594 )   $ 1,601,321  
Comprehensive income, net of tax:
                                               
Net loss
                            (45,149 )             (45,149 )
Other comprehensive income (loss):
                                               
Net unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale
                                    18,838          
Net change in unrealized gain on qualifying cash flow hedges
                                    (1,212 )        
Net change in unrecognized pension and postretirement costs
                                    (3,504 )        
 
                                             
Other comprehensive income total
                                            14,122  
 
                                             
Total comprehensive loss
                                            (31,027 )
Accretion of preferred stock discount
    1,478                       (1,478 )              
Dividends on preferred stock
                            (2,625 )             (2,625 )
Proceeds from stock options exercised and restricted stock activity
            312                                
Recognition of stock-based compensation
                    (275 )                     (275 )
Shares purchased for taxes
            (10 )     (21 )                     (21 )
 
                                   
Balance — March 31, 2009
  $ 267,566       126,299     $ 1,214,173     $ 121,106     $ (35,472 )   $ 1,567,373  
 
                                   
Balance at December 31, 2007
  $       75,722     $ 975,446     $ 597,333     $ 5,101     $ 1,577,880  
Comprehensive income, net of tax:
                                               
Net income
                            11,127               11,127  
Other comprehensive income:
                                               
Net unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale, net of reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net income
                                    8,570          
Net change in unrealized loss on qualifying cash flow hedges
                                    412          
 
                                             
Other comprehensive income total
                                            8,982  
 
                                             
Total comprehensive income
                                            20,109  
Proceeds from stock options exercised and restricted stock activity
            31                                
Recognition of stock-based compensation
                    1,068                       1,068  
Cash dividends declared on common shares - $0.29 per share
                            (21,958 )             (21,958 )
Shares purchased for taxes
            (5 )     (69 )                     (69 )
 
                                   
Balance — March 31, 2008
  $       75,748     $ 976,445     $ 586,502     $ 14,083     $ 1,577,030  
 
                                   
See notes to consolidated financial statements.

5


Table of Contents

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Citizens Republic Bancorp and Subsidiaries
                 
    Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
(in thousands)   2009     2008  
 
Operating Activities:
               
Net (loss) income
  $ (45,149 )   $ 11,127  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Provision for loan losses
    64,017       30,619  
Depreciation and software amortization
    2,953       3,005  
Amortization of intangibles
    2,037       2,447  
Net (increase) decrease in current and deferred income taxes
    (3,359 )     934  
Amortization and fair value adjustments of purchase accounting mark-to-market, net
    (2,690 )     (5,556 )
Fair value adjustment on loans held for sale and other real estate
    13,153        
Discount accretion and amortization of issuance costs on long term debt
    302       304  
Net accretion on investment securities
    (537 )     (2,306 )
Loans originated for sale
    (102,055 )     (107,965 )
Proceeds from loans held for sale
    95,995       104,814  
Net gains from loan sales
    (2,170 )     (2,234 )
Net loss on other real estate
    79       937  
Recognition of stock-based compensation expense
    (275 )     1,068  
Other
    (7,180 )     (13,489 )
 
           
Net cash provided by operating activities
    15,121       23,705  
Investing Activities:
               
Net increase in money market investments
    (266,564 )     (22,316 )
Securities available-for-sale:
               
Proceeds from maturities and payments
    174,699       144,339  
Purchases
    (168,412 )     (81,729 )
Securities held-to-maturity:
               
Proceeds from maturities and payments
          475  
Purchases
          (5,076 )
Net decrease (increase) in loans and leases
    305,149       (102,590 )
Proceeds from sales of other real estate
    5,688       4,545  
Net increase in properties and equipment
    (1,546 )     (586 )
 
           
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities
    49,014       (62,938 )
Financing Activities:
               
Net increase in demand and savings deposits
    295,468       326,449  
Net decrease in time deposits
    (228,590 )     (141,110 )
Net decrease in short-term borrowings
    (8,434 )     (1,795 )
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
          250,000  
Principal reductions in long-term debt
    (128,172 )     (390,711 )
Cash dividends paid on common stock
          (21,958 )
Cash dividends paid on preferred stock
    (2,625 )      
Shares acquired for retirement and purchased for taxes
    (21 )     (69 )
 
           
Net cash (used) provided by financing activities
    (72,374 )     20,806  
 
           
Net decrease in cash and due from banks
    (8,239 )     (18,427 )
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period
    171,695       241,104  
 
           
Cash and due from banks at end of period
  $ 163,456     $ 222,677  
 
           
 
Supplemental Cash Flow Information:
               
Interest paid
  $ 73,977     $ 103,243  
Income tax (refund) paid, net
    (108 )     5  
Loans transferred to other real estate
    8,786       17,860  
Loans held for sale transferred to other real estate
    4,546        
Accretion on redeemable preferred stock
    1,478        
See notes to consolidated financial statements.

6


Table of Contents

Part I — Financial Information
Item 1 — Consolidated Financial Statements
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Citizens Republic Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Note 1. Basis of Presentation and Accounting Policies
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Citizens Republic Bancorp, Inc. (“Citizens” or the “Corporation”) have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and the instructions for Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2009. The balance sheet at December 31, 2008 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. Certain amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in Citizens’ 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Citizens maintains an internet website at www.citizensbanking.com where the Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports are available without charge, as soon as reasonably practicable after Citizens files each such report with, or furnishes it to, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The information on Citizens’ website does not constitute a part of this report.
The Corporation has two active wholly owned trusts formed for the purpose of issuing securities which qualify as regulatory capital and are considered VIEs. The Corporation is not the primary beneficiary, and consequently, the trusts are not consolidated in the consolidated financial statements. Each of the two active trusts has issued separate offerings of trust preferred securities to investors in 2006 and 2003 for $150.0 million and $25.8 million, respectively. The gross proceeds from the issuances were used to purchase junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures issued by Citizens, which is the sole asset of each trust.
Statements of Financial Accounting Standards
SFAS 161 “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities — An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133”. On January 1, 2009, Citizens adopted SFAS 161, which enhances required disclosures regarding derivatives and hedging activities, including enhanced disclosures regarding (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments; (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” and its related interpretations and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS 161 requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about the fair value of and gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative instruments. The adoption of SFAS 161 had no impact on Citizens’ financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity. Refer to Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements for additional disclosures.
As required by SFAS 133, Citizens records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether Citizens has elected to designate a derivative in a hedging relationship and apply hedge accounting and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges. Hedge accounting generally provides for the matching of the timing of gain or loss recognition on the hedging instrument with the recognition of the changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk in a fair value hedge or the earnings effect of the hedged forecasted transactions in a cash flow hedge. Citizens may enter into derivative contracts that are intended to economically hedge certain of its risks, even though hedge accounting does not apply or the Company elects not to apply hedge accounting under SFAS 133.

7


Table of Contents

FASB Staff Position (FSP) on SFAS No. 157-2. In 2008, Citizens adopted FSP 157-2, which delayed the effective date of SFAS 157 for nonfinancial assets and liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually), to fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The adoption of FSP 157-2 had no impact on Citizens’ results of operations. Refer to Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for additional disclosures.
FSP EITF 03-6-1 Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities. On January 1, 2009, Citizens adopted FSP EITF 03-6-1. The FSP provides that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. The adoption of the FSP did not have a material impact on Citizens’ financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity. Refer to Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements for additional disclosures.
Note 2. New Accounting Pronouncements
FASB Staff Position (“FSP”)
FSP-SFAS 157-4 “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly”. On April 9, 2009 the FASB posted FSP SFAS 157-4, which affirms that the objective of fair value when the market for an asset is not active is the price that would be received to sell the asset in an orderly transaction and clarifies and includes additional factors for determining whether there has been a significant decrease in market activity for an asset when the market for that asset is not active. FSP SFAS 157-4 also provides additional disclosure requirements and is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009 with early adoption permitted. Citizens will adopt FSP SFAS 157-4 in the second quarter of 2009, and, when adopted, it is not expected to have a material impact on Citizens’ financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
FSP-SFAS 115-2 and SFAS 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments”.
On April 9, 2009 the FASB posted FSP SFAS 115-2 and SFAS 124-2, which changes existing guidance for determining whether an impairment is other than temporary to debt securities, replaces the existing requirement that Citizens’ management assert it has both the intent and ability to hold an impaired security until recovery with a requirement that management assert: (a) it does not have the intent to sell the security; and (b) it is more likely than not it will not have to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis. Under FSP SFAS 115-2 and 124-2, declines in fair value of held to maturity and available for sale securities below their cost that are deemed to be other than temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses to the extent the impairment is related to credit losses. The amount of impairment related to other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income. The FSP is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. Citizens will adopt FSP SFAS 115-2 and SFAS 124-2 in the second quarter of 2009, and, when adopted, it is not expected to have a material impact on Citizens’ financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
FSP-SFAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments”. On April 9, 2009 the FASB posted FSP SFAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, which amends SFAS 107, “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” to require Citizens to provide disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim financial information. This FSP also amends Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 28, “Interim Financial Reporting,” to require those disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting periods. Under this FSP, Citizens will need to include disclosures about the fair value of its financial instruments whenever it issues summarized financial information for interim reporting periods. In addition, Citizens will need to disclose in the body or in the accompanying notes of its summarized financial information for interim reporting periods and in its financial statements for annual reporting periods the fair value of all financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value, whether recognized or not recognized in the statement of financial position, as required by SFAS 107. The FSP is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The new interim disclosures required by FSP SFAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 will be included in Citizens’ interim financial statements beginning with the second quarter of 2009.

8


Table of Contents

FSP SFAS 141(R)-1, “Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from Contingencies”. On April 1, 2009 the FASB issued FSP SFAS 141(R)-1, which amends the guidance in SFAS 141 (Revised December 2007), “Business Combinations,” to require that assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination that arise from contingencies be recognized at fair value if fair value can be reasonably estimated. If fair value of such an asset or liability cannot be reasonably estimated, the asset or liability would generally be recognized in accordance with SFAS 5, “Accounting for Contingencies,” and FIN 14, “Reasonable Estimation of the Amount of a Loss.” FSP SFAS 141(R)-1 removes the subsequent accounting guidance for assets and liabilities arising from contingencies from SFAS 141R, and carries forward without significant revision, the guidance in SFAS 141. FSP SFAS 141(R)-1 eliminates the requirement to disclose an estimate of the range of outcomes of recognized contingencies at the acquisition date. For unrecognized contingencies, entities are required to include only the disclosures required by SFAS 5 and those disclosures should be included in the business combination footnote. FSP SFAS 141 (R)-1 requires that contingent consideration arrangements be treated as contingent consideration of the acquirer and should be initially and subsequently measured at fair value in accordance with SFAS 141R. The FSP is effective for assets or liabilities arising from contingencies in business combinations for which the acquisition date is January 1, 2009 or later.
FSP SFAS 132(R)-1, “Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets”. On December 30, 2008 the FASB issued FSP SFAS 132 (R)-1, which amends SFAS 132 (Revised 2003), “Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits,” to provide guidance on an employer’s disclosures about plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. The disclosures about plan assets required by the FSP will be provided in Citizens’ financial statements beginning with periods ending on or after December 15, 2009.
Note 3. Investment Securities
The amortized cost, estimated fair value and gross unrealized gains and losses of investment securities as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 follow:
                                                                 
    March 31, 2009     December 31, 2008  
            Estimated                             Estimated        
    Amortized     Fair     Gross Unrealized     Amortized     Fair     Gross Unrealized  
(in thousands)   Cost     Value     Gains     Losses     Cost     Value     Gains     Losses  
 
Available For Sale:
                                                               
Federal Agencies
  $ 219,912     $ 226,027     $ 6,115     $     $ 248,819     $ 257,445     $ 8,626     $  
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations
    519,305       476,886       5,337       47,756       528,626       471,010       4,147       61,763  
Mortgage-backed
    1,002,249       1,030,363       28,134       20       960,841       973,961       13,929       809  
State and municipal
    519,055       527,493       11,169       2,731       531,625       538,761       10,990       3,854  
Other
    11,234       11,229             5       7,598       7,595             3  
 
                                               
Total available for sale
  $ 2,271,755     $ 2,271,998     $ 50,755     $ 50,512     $ 2,277,509     $ 2,248,772     $ 37,692     $ 66,429  
 
                                               
Held to Maturity:
                                                               
State and municipal
                                                               
Total held to maturity
  $ 138,581     $ 138,840     $ 2,024     $ 1,765     $ 138,575     $ 137,846     $ 1,708     $ 2,437  
 
                                               
FHLB and Fed Reserve stock
  $ 148,764     $ 148,764     $     $     $ 148,764     $ 148,764     $     $  
 
                                               
As of March 31, 2009, 408 securities had unrealized losses compared with 486 securities as of December 31, 2008. Securities with unrealized losses, categorized by length of time the security has been in an unrealized loss position, as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are displayed in the following tables.

9


Table of Contents

                                                 
As of March 31, 2009   Less than 12 Months     More than 12 Months     Total  
    Estimated     Unrealized     Estimated     Unrealized     Estimated     Unrealized  
(in thousands)   Fair Value     Losses     Fair Value     Losses     Fair Value     Losses  
 
Available For Sale:
                                               
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations
  $ 50,857     $ 6,354     $ 177,186     $ 41,402     $ 228,043     $ 47,756  
Mortgage-backed
    1,521       6       639       14       2,160       20  
State and municipal
    93,324       2,463       6,024       268       99,348       2,731  
Other
    7       5                   7       5  
 
                                   
Total available for sale
    145,709       8,828       183,849       41,684       329,558       50,512  
 
                                   
 
                                               
Held to Maturity:
                                               
State and municipal
    49,987       1,415       5,206       350       55,193       1,765  
 
                                   
Total held to maturity
    49,987       1,415       5,206       350       55,193       1,765  
 
                                   
Total
  $ 195,696     $ 10,243     $ 189,055     $ 42,034     $ 384,751     $ 52,277  
 
                                   
                                                 
As of December 31, 2008   Less than 12 Months     More than 12 Months     Total  
    Estimated     Unrealized     Estimated     Unrealized     Estimated     Unrealized  
(in thousands)   Fair Value     Losses     Fair Value     Losses     Fair Value     Losses  
 
Available For Sale:
                                               
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations
  $ 231,892     $ 61,436     $ 3,085     $ 327     $ 234,977     $ 61,763  
Mortgage-backed
    74,081       796       421       13       74,502       809  
State and municipal
    112,353       3,688       3,220       166       115,573       3,854  
Other
    7       3                   7       3  
 
                                   
Total available for sale
    418,333       65,923       6,726       506       425,059       66,429  
 
                                   
 
                                               
Held to Maturity:
                                               
State and municipal
    51,896       1,967       6,481       470       58,377       2,437  
 
                                   
Total held to maturity
    51,896       1,967       6,481       470       58,377       2,437  
 
                                   
Total
  $ 470,229     $ 67,890     $ 13,207     $ 976     $ 483,436     $ 68,866  
 
                                   
Citizens performs a review of securities with unrealized losses at each reporting period. The review centers on an assessment of whether and when a security will recover in value, and whether or not the company has the positive intent and ability to hold that security until the anticipated recovery of value. In assessing the recovery of value, the primary factors evaluated are the degree to which fair value is below carrying cost, the length of time the fair value has remained continuously below carrying cost, and credit quality factors affecting the issuer or the underlying collateral. Credit quality factors can include the financial condition of the issuer or the insurer, which are often evidenced in credit ratings, regulatory, tax, or industry-related issues. Evaluations are performed on a more frequent basis as the degree to which fair value is below carrying cost or the length of time that the fair value has been continuously below carrying cost increases. As of March 31, 2009, management has concluded that all issuers have the ability to pay contractual cash flows. The unrealized losses displayed in the above table are believed to be temporary and thus no impairment loss has been realized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Citizens has the intent and ability to hold the impaired securities to anticipated recovery, but may change its intent in response to significant, unanticipated changes in policies, regulations, statutory legislation or other aforementioned criteria.
The collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMO”) sector includes securities where the underlying collateral consists of agency issued or whole loan mortgages. At March 31, 2009, the CMOs were substantially comprised of whole loan CMOs, which had a market value of $225.0 million with gross unrealized losses of $47.6 million. Management continued to perform thorough credit reviews on the underlying mortgage collateral as well as the supporting credit enhancement and structure and determined that none of its whole loan CMO securities had an other-than-temporary-impairment as of March 31, 2009. The results of the credit review demonstrated continued strength and no material degradation in the holdings. All of the securities have investment grade ratings of and 93% were rated AAA by two rating agencies, further supporting management’s assessment.

10


Table of Contents

Note 4. Allowance for Loan Losses and Impaired Loans
A summary of loan loss experience during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 is provided below.
Analysis of Allowance for Loan Losses
                 
    Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
(in thousands)   2009     2008  
 
Allowance for loan losses — beginning of period
  $ 255,321     $ 163,353  
Provision for loan losses
    64,017       30,619  
Charge-offs:
               
 
               
Commercial and industrial
    8,108       1,045  
Commercial real estate
    18,977       9,132  
 
           
Total commercial
    27,085       10,177  
Residential mortgage
    804       1,769  
Direct consumer
    4,707       3,522  
Indirect consumer
    5,507       3,141  
 
           
Charge-offs
    38,103       18,609  
 
Recoveries:
               
Commercial
    128       142  
Commercial real estate
    404       50  
 
           
Total commercial
    532       192  
Residential mortgage
    3        
Direct consumer
    334       472  
Indirect consumer
    543       501  
 
           
Recoveries
    1,412       1,165  
 
           
Net charge-offs
    36,691       17,444  
 
           
Allowance for loan losses — end of period
  $ 282,647     $ 176,528  
 
           
Nonperforming loans totaled $428.6 million at March 31, 2009 and $306.0 million at December 31, 2008. Some of Citizens’ nonperforming loans are considered to be impaired. SFAS 114, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan,” considers a loan to be impaired when it is probable that all of the principal and interest due under the original underwriting terms of the loan may not be collected. In most instances, impairment is measured based on the fair value of the underlying collateral. Impairment may also be measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate. Citizens measures impairment on all nonaccrual commercial and commercial real estate loans for which it has established specific reserves. This policy does not apply to large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans, such as smaller balance commercial loans, direct and indirect consumer loans, and residential mortgage loans, which are collectively evaluated for impairment, except for those loans restructured under a troubled debt restructuring. Citizens maintains a valuation reserve for impaired loans as part of the specific allocated allowance component of the allowance for loan losses. Cash collected on impaired nonaccrual loans is applied to outstanding principal. Total loans considered impaired and their related reserve balances at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 follow:

11


Table of Contents

                                 
Impaired Loan Information   Balances     Valuation Reserve  
    March 31,     December 31,     March 31,     December 31,  
(in thousands)   2009     2008     2009     2008  
 
Balances
                               
Impaired loans with valuation reserve
  $ 148,039     $ 101,671     $ 46,567     $ 39,885  
Impaired loans with no valuation reserve
    123,576       87,330              
 
                       
Total impaired loans
  $ 271,615     $ 189,001     $ 46,567     $ 39,885  
 
                       
Impaired loans on nonaccrual basis
  $ 271,615     $ 189,001     $ 46,567     $ 39,885  
Impaired loans on accrual basis
                       
 
                       
Total impaired loans
  $ 271,615     $ 189,001     $ 46,567     $ 39,885  
 
                       
The average balance of impaired loans for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was $230.3 million and $60.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008. The increase is due to the continued migration of commercial real estate loans to nonperforming status. Interest income recognized on impaired loans in both periods was immaterial. Cash collected and applied to outstanding principal during the first quarter of 2009 was $2.0 million compared with $0.2 million in the same period of 2008.
Note 5. Goodwill
Citizens performed an evaluation to determine if events or circumstances had occurred since the last evaluation which would indicate goodwill impairment at March 31, 2009. As the key inputs and drivers remained consistent with those used as of the annual impairment testing date, Citizens concluded that no additional impairment was indicated. The last time Citizens recorded a goodwill impairment was during the second quarter of 2008, when it determined that the fair value of the Specialty Commercial reporting unit was below its carrying value. At that time, Citizens recorded a non-cash, not tax-deductible goodwill impairment charge of $178.1 million, representing the entire amount of goodwill allocated to the Specialty Commercial reporting unit.
A summary of goodwill allocated to the lines of business as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 follows:
                 
    March 31,     December 31,  
(in thousands)   2009     2008  
 
Regional Banking
  $ 595,417     $ 595,417  
Wealth Management
    1,801       1,801  
 
           
Total Goodwill
  $ 597,218     $ 597,218  
 
           

12


Table of Contents

Note 6. Long-Term Debt
The components of long-term debt as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are presented below.
                 
    March 31,     December 31,  
(in thousands)   2009     2008  
 
Citizens (Parent only):
               
Subordinated debt:
               
5.75% subordinated notes due February 2013
  $ 120,400     $ 120,136  
Variable rate junior subordinated debenture due June 2033
    25,774       25,774  
7.50% junior subordinated debentures due September 2066
    147,183       146,927  
Subsidiaries:
               
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
    1,666,507       1,666,483  
Other borrowed funds
    104,711       233,303  
 
           
Total long-term debt
  $ 2,064,575     $ 2,192,623  
 
           
Note 7. Income Taxes
The income tax provision (benefit) for the first quarter of 2009 was $(3.5) million, compared with $0.9 million for the first quarter of 2008. The decrease was primarily due to the effect of lower pre-tax income and current period adjustments to other comprehensive income (“OCI”). The effective tax rate for the first quarter of 2009 was 7.13%, which includes adjustments for tax-exempt income, adjustments to the deferred tax asset valuation allowance, and changes in other comprehensive income.
Generally, the calculation for the income tax provision (benefit) does not consider the tax effects of changes in other comprehensive income, which is a component of shareholders’ equity on the balance sheet. However, an exception is provided in certain circumstances, such as when there is a pre-tax loss from continuing operations. In such case, pre-tax income from other categories (such as changes in OCI) is included in the calculation of the tax provision for the current year. For the first quarter of 2009, this resulted in an increase to the income tax benefit.
Note 8. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 are presented below.
                 
    Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
(in thousands)   2009     2008  
 
Balance at beginning of period
  $ (49,594 )   $ 5,101  
Net change in unrealized gain on securities, net of tax effect of $10,143 in 2009 and $4,615 in 2008
    18,838       8,570  
Net change in unrealized (loss) gain on cash flow hedges, net of tax effect of ($652) in 2009 and $222 in 2008
    (1,212 )     412  
Net change in unrecognized pension and postretirement costs, net of tax effect of ($1,887) in 2009
    (3,504 )      
 
           
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax
  $ (35,472 )   $ 14,083  
 
           
The accumulated net unrealized gain on cash flow hedges was $18.3 million at March 31, 2009 and $19.5 million at December 31, 2008.

13


Table of Contents

Note 9. Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities
Certain assets and liabilities are recorded at fair value to provide financial statement users additional insight into the quality of Citizens’ earnings. Some of these assets and liabilities are measured on a recurring basis while others are measured on a nonrecurring basis, with the determination based upon applicable existing accounting pronouncements. For example, investment securities available for sale, derivative financial instruments and deferred compensation assets are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Other assets, such as mortgage servicing rights, loans held for sale, impaired loans, goodwill, other intangible assets, other real estate (“ORE”), and repossessed assets are recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis using the lower of cost or market value to determine impairment of individual assets.
Under SFAS 157, Citizens groups assets and liabilities which are recorded at fair value into three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement (with Level 1 considered highest and Level 3 considered lowest). A brief description of each level follows.
Level 1 — Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.
Level 2 — Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.
Level 3 — Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use at least one significant assumption not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect estimates that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques include use of discounted cash flow models and similar techniques.
The most significant instruments that Citizens fair values include securities and derivative instruments, most of which fall into Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy with the remainder included in Level 3. The securities in the available for sale portfolio which are included in Level 2 are priced by independent providers. In obtaining such valuation information from third parties, Citizens has evaluated their valuation methodologies used to develop the fair values in order to determine whether such valuations are representative of an exit price in Citizens’ principal markets. Further, Citizens has developed an internal, independent price verification function that performs testing on valuations received from third parties. Citizens’ principal markets for its securities portfolios are the secondary institutional markets, with an exit price that is predominantly reflective of bid level pricing in those markets. Derivative instruments are priced by independent providers using observable market assumptions with adjustments based on widely accepted valuation techniques. A discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative reflects the contractual terms of the derivative, including the period to maturity, and uses market-based inputs, including interest rate curves, implied volatilities, and credit valuation adjustments.
ASSETS AND LIABILITIES RECORDED AT FAIR VALUE ON A RECURRING BASIS
Investment Securities Available for Sale. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices for similar assets, if available. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are measured using matrix pricing models, or other model-based valuation techniques requiring observable inputs other than quoted prices such as yield curves, prepayment speeds, and default rates. Recurring Level 1 securities would include U.S. Treasury securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active over-the-counter markets. Recurring Level 2 securities include federal agency securities, mortgage-backed securities, collateralized mortgage obligations, municipal bonds and corporate debt securities.
Recurring Level 3 securities include auction rate securities issued by student-loan authorities. An auction rate security typically refers to a debt instrument with a long-term nominal maturity for which the interest rate is regularly reset through a Dutch auction. Since February 2008, most such auctions have failed, and the auction market has been frozen, with holders unable to dispose of their securities. Due to the nature of the auction rate securities and the current illiquid market, Citizens uses unobservable inputs (Level 3) in the valuation process. In conducting the fair value analysis Citizens relies on a model to estimate the price that each group of securities would transact for between market participants as of the valuation date. The model relies on information from various sources in making market participant assumptions, particularly with regard to the discount rate that would be applied to the securities’ expected cash flow and the term over which this discount rate would stabilize. As of March 31, 2009, the market for auction rate securities had not recovered and the fair value of these securities did not significantly change from December 31, 2008.

14


Table of Contents

Derivative Financial Instruments. Substantially all derivative financial instruments held or issued by Citizens are traded in over-the-counter markets where quoted market prices are not readily available. For those derivatives, Citizens measures fair value using models that use primarily market observable inputs, such as yield curves and option volatilities, and include the value associated with counterparty credit risk (credit valuation adjustments). Citizens assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions, and determined that the credit valuation adjustments were not significant to the overall valuation of its derivatives.
Deferred Compensation Assets. Citizens has a portfolio of mutual fund investments which hedge the deferred compensation liabilities to various employees, former employees and directors. These investments are traded on active exchanges with valuations obtained from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets and are classified as recurring Level 1. Additionally, Citizens invests in a Guaranteed Income Fund as well as pooled separate accounts which fall into the recurring Level 2 category due to the underlying assets being valued based on similar assets in an active market.
The following table presents the balances of assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2009.
                                 
    March 31, 2009  
(in thousands)   Total     Level 1     Level 2     Level 3  
 
Investment Securities Available for Sale
  $ 2,271,998     $     $ 2,265,947     $ 6,051  
Other assets (1)
    84,665       3,676       80,989        
 
                       
Total Assets
  $ 2,356,663     $ 3,676     $ 2,346,936     $ 6,051  
 
                       
 
                               
Other liabilities (2)
  $ 40,775     $     $ 40,775     $  
 
(1)   Includes Derivative Financial Instruments and Deferred Compensation Assets.
 
(2)   Includes Derivative Financial Instruments.
SFAS 157 requires a reconciliation of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). The following table presents the reconciliation of Level 3 assets held by Citizens at March 31, 2009.
         
    Investment  
    Securities  
(in thousands)   Available for Sale  
 
Assets
       
Balance at 12/31/08
  $ 6,045  
Discount Accretion
    6  
 
     
Balance at 3/31/09
  $ 6,051  
 
     
ASSETS AND LIABILITIES RECORDED AT FAIR VALUE ON A NONRECURRING BASIS
Mortgage Servicing Rights. Mortgage servicing rights represent the value associated with servicing residential mortgage loans. The value is determined through a discounted cash flow analysis which uses interest rates, prepayment speeds and delinquency rate assumptions as inputs. All of these assumptions require a significant degree of management judgment. Adjustments are only made when the discounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount. As such, Citizens classifies mortgage servicing rights as nonrecurring Level 3. Based on Citizens’ most recent evaluation, the estimated fair value exceeded Citizens’ carrying amount so mortgage servicing rights are still carried at cost, net of amortization, and therefore are not presented in the following table at this time.

15


Table of Contents

Loans Held for Sale. Mortgage loans held for sale are comprised of loans originated for sale in the ordinary course of business and portfolio loans transferred to loans held for sale for liquidation. Loans originated for sale are recorded at the lower of carrying amount or market value based on what secondary markets are currently offering for loans with similar characteristics and are classified as nonrecurring Level 2. Portfolio loans that are transferred to loans held for sale are recorded at fair value based on recent sales experience for similar loans, adjusted for management’s judgment due to current market conditions, and are classified as nonrecurring Level 3.
Commercial loans held for sale are comprised of loans identified for sale that are recorded at the lower of carrying amount or market value based on appraisals of the underlying collateral, adjusted based on management’s judgment due to current market conditions, and are classified as nonrecurring Level 3.
Impaired Loans. A loan is considered to be impaired when it is probable that all of the principal and interest due under the original underwriting terms of the loan may not be collected. Impairment is measured based on the fair value of the underlying collateral, adjusted based on management’s judgment due to current market conditions. Citizens measures impairment on all nonaccrual commercial and industrial and commercial real estate loans for which it has established specific reserves as part of the specific allocated allowance component of the allowance for loan losses. As such, Citizens records impaired loans as nonrecurring Level 3.
Goodwill. Goodwill is evaluated by reporting unit, which is the equivalent of Citizens’ lines of business. The fair value of the reporting units is estimated using discounted cash flow models derived from internal earnings forecasts. The primary assumptions used by Citizens include ten-year earnings forecasts, terminal values based on estimated future growth rates, and discount rates based on capital asset pricing models. As such, Citizens records goodwill as nonrecurring Level 3. At March 31, 2009, a fair value adjustment to goodwill was not required and therefore is not included in the following table.
Core Deposit Intangible. The core deposit intangible is the asset that represents the present value of the cost savings obtained from the funding associated with the purchase of core deposits through an acquisition. The core deposit intangible was valued using a discounted cost savings approach and as such was classified as a nonrecurring Level 3. At March 31, 2009, a market value adjustment to core deposit intangible assets was not required and therefore is not included in the following table.
Other Real Estate. Other real estate is comprised of commercial and residential real estate acquired through foreclosure proceedings or acceptance of a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, and former branch locations. These properties are carried at the lower of cost or market value at the time of acquisition, based on current appraised value adjusted based on management’s judgment due to current market conditions. Losses arising from the initial acquisition of such properties are charged against the allowance for loan losses at the time of transfer. Subsequent valuation adjustments to reflect the lower of cost or market value, as well as gains and losses on disposal of these properties, are charged to other expenses as incurred. Citizens records ORE properties as nonrecurring Level 3.
Repossessed Assets. Repossessed assets consist of consumer assets acquired to satisfy the consumer’s outstanding delinquent debt. These assets consist of automobiles, boats, recreational vehicles and other personal items. These assets are carried at the lower of cost or market value at the time of acquisition, based on internally developed procedures. Losses arising from the initial acquisition of such assets, as well as gains and losses on disposal of these assets are charged to the allowance for loan losses. Citizens records repossessed assets as nonrecurring Level 3.
The following table includes assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis that have had a fair value adjustment as of March 31, 2009.

16


Table of Contents

                                 
    March 31, 2009  
(in thousands)   Total     Level 1     Level 2     Level 3  
 
Loans (1)
  $ 114,828     $     $     $ 114,828  
Commercial Loans Held For Sale (2)
    4,926                   4,926  
Other Real Estate (3)
    7,859                   7,859  
Repossessed Assets (4)
    2,884                   2,884  
 
                       
Total Assets
  $ 130,497     $     $     $ 130,497  
 
                       
 
(1)   Impaired Loans with an initial carrying value of $148.7 million were written down to their fair value of $114.8 million.
 
(2)   Impaired Loans with an initial carrying value of $9.6 million were written down to their fair value of $4.9 million.
 
(3)   ORE properties with an initial carrying value of $14.6 million were written down to their fair value of $7.9 million.
 
(4)   Repossessed Consumer Assets with an initial carrying value of $5.2 million were written down to their fair value of $2.9 million.
Note 10. Pension Benefit Cost
Citizens recognizes changes in the funded status (i.e. the difference between the fair value of plan assets and the projected benefit obligations) of its pension plan as adjustments to accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax. The components of pension expense for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 are presented below.
                 
    Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
(in thousands)   2009     2008  
  | |
Defined Benefit Pension Plans
               
Interest cost
  $ 1,105     $ 1,165  
Expected return on plan assets
    (1,570 )     (1,900 )
Amortization of unrecognized:
               
Prior service cost
    8       10  
Net actuarial loss
    335       75  
 
           
Net pension cost
  $ (122 )   $ (650 )
 
           
Supplemental Pension Plans
               
Interest cost
  $ 189     $ 190  
Curtailment loss
    941        
Amortization of unrecognized:
               
Prior service cost
          118  
Net actuarial loss
    3       5  
 
           
Net pension cost
  $ 1,133     $ 313  
 
           
Postretirement Benefit Plans
               
Interest cost
  $ 152     $ 129  
Amortization of unrecognized:
               
Prior service cost
    (67 )     (64 )
Net actuarial gain
    (8 )     (9 )
 
           
Net pension cost
  $ 77     $ 56  
 
           
Defined contribution retirement and 401K Plans
               
Employer contributions
  $ 1,349     $ 1,845  
 
           
Total periodic benefit cost
  $ 2,437     $ 1,564  
 
           
Citizens maintains multiple employee benefit plans, including defined benefit pension, supplemental pension, postretirement healthcare, and defined contribution retirement and 401(k) plans. Citizens has not made a cash contribution to the defined benefit pension plan during the first three months of 2009 but reviews plan funding needs periodically and will make a contribution if appropriate. During the first three months of 2009, Citizens

17


Table of Contents

contributed $0.1 million to the supplemental pension plans and anticipates that an additional $7.7 million of contributions will be made during the remaining nine months of the year. Citizens contributed $0.2 million to the postretirement benefit plan during the first three months of 2009 and anticipates making an additional $0.7 million in contributions for the remaining portion of the year. Citizens contributed $3.8 million to the defined contribution retirement and 401(k) plan for employer matching funds and annual discretionary contributions during the first three months of 2009 and anticipates contributing an additional $3.0 million during the remaining portion of the year.
During the first quarter of 2009, Citizens recognized a curtailment charge of $0.9 million as a result of a reduction of the expected years of future service for the supplemental pension plan participants.
Note 11. Stock-Based Compensation
Citizens has a stock-based compensation plan authorizing the granting of incentive and nonqualified stock options, nonvested stock awards (also known as restricted stock), restricted stock units, and performance awards to employees and non-employee directors. Aggregate grants under the current shareholder approved plan may not exceed 7,000,000 shares, with grants other than stock options further limited to 2,000,000 shares. In December 2008, the Board of Directors approved an amendment to the stock-based compensation plan to reduce the number of shares reserved for future issuance by 1,000,000 shares in order to provide sufficient authorized shares to establish a share reserve for the warrant issued to the U.S. Department of Treasury. At March 31, 2009, Citizens had 2,157,956 shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under the current plan. Restrictions on nonvested stock generally lapse in three annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date. Restricted shares are included in outstanding stock totals, and are entitled to receive dividends and have voting rights.
The following table sets forth the total stock-based compensation expense resulting from stock options and restricted stock awards included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008.
                 
    Three Months Ended  
Analysis of Stock-Based Compensation Expense   March 31,  
(in thousands)   2009     2008  
 
Stock Option Compensation
  $ 4     $ 8  
Restricted Stock Compensation
    (279 )     1,060  
 
           
Stock-based compensation expense before income taxes
    (275 )     1,068  
Income tax provision (benefit)
    96       (374 )
 
           
Total stock-based compensation expense after income taxes
  $ (179 )   $ 694  
 
           
During the first quarter of 2009, a pre-tax expense reversal of $1.3 million was made to stock-based compensation as a result of actual forfeitures exceeding the estimated forfeiture rate for restricted stock.
There were no stock option exercises for the three months ended March 31, 2009. Cash proceeds from the exercise of stock options was less than $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008. New shares are issued when stock options are exercised. In accordance with SFAS 123R, “Stock-Based Compensation,” Citizens presents excess tax benefits from the exercise of stock options, if any, as financing cash inflows and as operating cash outflows on the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.
There were no stock options granted in the three months ended March 31, 2009. As of March 31, 2009, $3.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options and restricted stock is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.7 years.
The following table summarizes restricted stock activity for the three months ended March 31, 2009.

18


Table of Contents

                 
            Weighted-Average
    Number of   Grant Date Fair
    Shares   Value
  | |
Outstanding restricted stock at December 31, 2008
    609,032     $ 14.43  
Granted
    384,818       1.29  
Vested
    (37,352 )     19.19  
Forfeited
    (72,354 )     18.98  
 
               
Restricted stock at March 31, 2009
    884,144       8.14  
 
               
The total fair value of shares vested during the three months ended March 31, 2009 was less than $0.1 million.
Note 12. Shareholders’ Equity and Earnings Per Share
Earnings per common share is computed using the two-class method under the guidelines of SFAS 128, “Earnings Per Share.” Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income allocated to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, excluding outstanding participating securities. Participating securities include nonvested stock awards (also known as restricted stock) because holders of these securities receive non-forfeitable dividends at the same rate as holders of common stock and have voting rights. Diluted earnings per common share is computed based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding including the dilutive effect of stock-based compensation. SFAS 128 prohibits the computation of diluted earnings per common share from assuming conversion, exercise or contingent issuance of securities that would have an antidilutive effect on earnings per common share. As a result the incremental shares from the potential conversion of employee stock options and restricted stock awards were excluded from the diluted earnings per common share calculation for the first quarter of 2009.
During the three months ended March 31, 2009 dividends of $2.6 million and accretion of $1.5 million were recorded on the 300,000 shares of fixed rate cumulative perpetual preferred stock, increasing the net loss attributable to common shareholders and affecting the calculation of basic and diluted net loss per common share.
A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per common share computations follows:
                 
    Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
(in thousands, except per share amounts)   2009     2008  
 
Basic and diluted earnings per share — net income (loss)
  $ (45,149 )   $ 11,127  
Dividend on redeemable preferred stock
    (4,103 )      
 
           
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders
    (49,252 )     11,127  
Net income (loss) allocated to participating securities
    (311 )     71  
 
           
Net income (loss) allocated to common shareholders
  $ (48,941 )   $ 11,056  
 
           
 
               
Weighted average shares outstanding
    126,198       75,731  
Less: Participating securities included in weighted average shares outstanding
    (798 )     (483 )
 
           
Weighted average shares outstanding for basic earnings per common share
    125,400       75,248  
Effect of dilutive securities — potential conversion of employee stock options and restricted stock awards
          25  
 
           
Weighted average shares outstanding for dilutive earnings per common share
    125,400       75,273  
 
           
Basic earnings per common share
  $ (0.39 )   $ 0.15  
 
           
Diluted earnings per common share
  $ (0.39 )   $ 0.15  
 
           

19


Table of Contents

Note 13. Lines of Business
Citizens is managed along the following business lines: Specialty Commercial, Regional Banking, Wealth Management, and Other. Selected line of business segment information for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 is provided below. Certain amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation. These reclassifications do not have a significant effect on any one line of business and do not change the total for the corporation. There are no significant intersegment revenues.
Line of Business Information
                                         
    Specialty     Regional     Wealth              
(in thousands)   Commercial     Banking     Mgmt     Other     Total  
  | | | | |
Earnings Summary — Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
                                       
Net interest income (taxable equivalent)
  $ 15,152     $ 67,086     $ 119     $ (1,074 )   $ 81,283  
Provision for loan losses
    27,298       24,085             12,634       64,017  
 
                             
Net interest income after provision
    (12,146 )     43,001       119       (13,708 )     17,266  
Noninterest income
    (5,812 )     17,693       4,740       2,612       19,233  
Noninterest expense
    4,371       56,752       4,066       15,589       80,778  
 
                             
Income before income taxes
    (22,329 )     3,942       793       (26,685 )     (44,279 )
Income tax expense (taxable equivalent)
    (7,815 )     1,380       278       7,027       870  
 
                             
Net income
  $ (14,514 )   $ 2,562     $ 515     $ (33,712 )   $ (45,149 )
 
                             
 
                                       
Average assets (in millions)
  $ 1,762     $ 5,014     $ 11     $ 6,293     $ 13,080  
 
                             
 
                                       
Earnings Summary — Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 (1)
                                       
 
                                       
Net interest income (taxable equivalent)
  $ 15,111     $ 69,898     $ (9 )   $ 7,991     $ 92,991  
Provision for loan losses
    18,093       7,196             5,330       30,619  
 
                             
Net interest income after provision
    (2,982 )     62,702       (9 )     2,661       62,372  
Noninterest income
    253       19,521       6,690       4,461       30,925  
Noninterest expense
    4,204       55,290       5,175       11,893       76,562  
 
                             
Income before income taxes
    (6,933 )     26,933       1,506       (4,771 )     16,735  
Income tax expense (taxable equivalent)
    (2,427 )     9,427       528       (1,920 )     5,608  
 
                             
Net income
  $ (4,506 )   $ 17,506     $ 978     $ (2,851 )   $ 11,127  
 
                             
 
                                       
Average assets (in millions)
  $ 1,941     $ 6,113     $ 13     $ 5,375     $ 13,442  
 
                             
 
(1)   Certain amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.
Note 14. Commitments, Contingent Liabilities and Guarantees
The Consolidated Financial Statements do not reflect various loan commitments (unfunded loans and unused lines of credit) and letters of credit originated in the normal course of business. Loan commitments are made to accommodate the financial needs of clients. Generally, new loan commitments do not extend beyond 120 days prior to being funded and unused lines of credit are reviewed at least annually. Letters of credit guarantee future payment of client financial obligations to third parties. They are normally issued for services provided or to facilitate the shipment of goods, and generally expire within one year. Both arrangements have essentially the same level of credit risk as that associated with extending loans to clients and are subject to Citizens’ normal credit policies. Inasmuch as these arrangements generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses, most expire unfunded and do not necessarily represent future liquidity requirements. Collateral is obtained based on Citizens’ assessment of the client and may include receivables, inventories, real property and equipment.

20


Table of Contents

Amounts available to clients under loan commitments and standby letters of credit follow:
                 
    March 31,     December 31,  
(in thousands)   2009     2008  
  | |
Loan commitments and letters of credit:
               
Commitments to extend credit
  $ 1,829,610     $ 2,048,258  
Financial standby letters of credit
    251,927       225,675  
Performance standby letters of credit
    21,658       21,692  
 
           
Total loan commitments and letters of credit
  $ 2,103,195     $ 2,295,625  
 
           
At March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, a liability of $4.2 million and $3.9 million, respectively, was recorded for possible losses on commitments to extend credit. In accordance with FIN 45, a liability of $0.7 million was recorded at both March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 representing the value of the guarantee obligations associated with certain letters of credit. The guarantee obligation liability will be amortized into income over the life of the commitments. These balances are included in other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Note 15. Derivatives and Hedging Activities
Risk Management Objective of Using Derivatives
Citizens is exposed to certain risks arising from both its business operations and economic conditions. Citizens manages economic risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk, primarily through the amount, sources, and duration of its assets and liabilities and the use of derivative financial instruments. Specifically, Citizens enters into derivative financial instruments to manage exposures that arise from business activities that result in the receipt or payment of future known and uncertain cash amounts, the value of which are determined by interest rates. Citizens’ derivative financial instruments are used to manage differences in the amount, timing, and duration of its known or expected cash receipts and cash payments principally related to certain variable-rate loan assets and fixed-rate borrowings.
Fair Values of Derivative Instruments on the Balance Sheet
The table below presents the fair value of Citizens’ derivative financial instruments as well as their classification on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
                                 
Location   Other Assets     Other Liabilities  
    Fair Value     Fair Value  
    Mar 31,     Dec 31,     Mar 31,     Dec 31,  
(in thousands)   2009     2008     2009     2008  
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133 Interest Rate Products
  $ 30,119     $ 30,984     $     $  
 
                               
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133 Interest Rate Products
    44,505       47,950       40,775       44,837  
 
                       
Total Derivatives
  $ 74,624     $ 78,934     $ 40,775     $ 44,837  
 
                       
Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk
Citizens’ objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest income and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, Citizens primarily uses interest rate swaps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of fixed-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for Citizens making variable-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount. As of March 31, 2009, Citizens had 17 interest rate swaps with an aggregate notional amount of $600 million that were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk.

21


Table of Contents

The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income and is subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, such derivatives were used to hedge the variable cash inflows associated with existing pools of prime and LIBOR-based loan assets. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives is recognized directly in earnings. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, Citizens recognized a loss of $0.1 million for hedge ineffectiveness attributable to a mismatch between the swap notional amount and the aggregate principal amount of the designated loan pools. No hedge ineffectiveness was recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2008.
In addition, two swaps failed to qualify for hedge accounting due to this mismatch during the fourth quarter of 2008 and were subsequently terminated in January 2009. Accordingly, the change in fair value of these swaps during the three months ended March 31, 2009 of less than $0.1 million was recognized directly in earnings as a loss. The fair value of this swap at December 31, 2008 and its change in fair value during the three months ended March 31, 2009 are disclosed under the sections entitled “Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments” throughout this footnote.
Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income related to derivatives are reclassified to interest income as interest payments are received on Citizens’ variable-rate assets. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, Citizens accelerated the reclassification of an unrealized gain in accumulated other comprehensive income of $0.2 million to earnings as a result of the hedged forecasted transactions becoming probable not to occur. During the next twelve months, Citizens estimates that $10.0 million will be reclassified as an increase to interest income.
The following table summarizes the impact of cash flow hedges on the Consolidated Financial Statements for the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.
                                                                 
    Derivative Impact on OCI gain (loss)     Derivative Ineffectiveness gain (loss)  
                    Location     Reclassified from     Location        
(in thousands)                   Reclassified into     Accumulated OCI into     Recognized in        
Derivatives Relationship   Recognized in OCI     Income     Income     Income     Amount  
    Mar 31,     Mar 31,             Mar 31,     Mar 31,             Mar 31,     Mar 31,  
    2009     2008             2009     2008             2009     2008  
Cash flow hedges:
                                                               
Interest Rate Products
  $ 1,896     $ 807     Interest income   $ 3,433     $ 173     Other income   $ (78 )   $  
 
                                                   
 
                  Other income     327                                
 
                                                   
Total
  $ 1,896     $ 807             $ 3,760     $ 173             $ (78 )   $  
 
                                                   
Fair Value Hedges of Interest Rate Risk
Citizens is exposed to changes in the fair value of certain of its fixed-rate obligations due to changes in the benchmark interest rate, LIBOR. Interest rate swaps designated as fair value hedges involve the receipt of fixed-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for Citizens making variable-rate payments over the life of the agreements without the exchange of the underlying notional amount. As of March 31, 2009, Citizens had 10 interest rate swaps with an aggregate notional balance of $430.0 million.
For derivatives that are designated and qualify as fair value hedges, the gain or loss on the derivative as well as the offsetting loss or gain on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk are recognized in earnings. Citizens includes the gain or loss on the hedged items in the same line item as the offsetting loss or gain on the related derivatives. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, Citizens recognized a gain of $2.2 million in interest expense related to hedge ineffectiveness. No hedge ineffectiveness was recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2008. Citizens also recognized a net addition/(reduction) to interest expense of less than $0.1 million and ($0.6) million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, related to Citizens’ fair value hedges, which includes net settlements on the derivatives, ineffectiveness and any amortization adjustment of the basis in the hedged items.
The following table summarizes the impact of fair value hedges on the Consolidated Financial Statements for the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.

22


Table of Contents

                                                 
    Statement of Operations
    Derivative Contract Gain (Loss)   Hedged Item Gain (Loss)
(in thousands)           Mar 31,   Mar 31,           Mar 31,   Mar 31,
Derivatives Relationship   Location   2009   2008   Location   2009   2008
Fair value hedges:
                                               
Interest Rate Products
  Interest expense   $ 313     $ 238     Interest expense   $ 1,920     $ (238 )
Non-designated Hedges
Citizens does not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes. At March 31, 2009, Citizens did not use credit derivatives for any purpose. Derivatives not designated as hedges are used to manage Citizens’ exposure to interest rate movements and other identified risks but do not meet the strict hedge accounting requirements of SFAS 133. Changes in the fair value of derivatives not designated in hedging relationships are recorded directly in earnings. Additionally, Citizens holds interest rate derivatives, including interest rate swaps and option products, resulting from a service Citizens provides to certain customers. Citizens executes interest rate derivatives with commercial banking customers to facilitate their respective risk management strategies. Those derivatives are simultaneously hedged by offsetting derivatives that Citizens executes with a third party, such that Citizens minimizes its net risk exposure resulting from such transactions. As of March 31, 2009, Citizens had 298 derivative transactions with an aggregate notional amount of $1.1 billion related to this program.
The following table summarizes the impact of derivatives not designated as hedges on the Consolidated Financial Statements for the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.
                         
            Amount of Gain or
            (Loss) Recognized in
            Income Statement
    Location of Gain or        
(in thousands)   (Loss) Recognized in   Mar 31,   Mar 31,
Derivative Relationship   Income Statement   2009   2008
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedges
                       
Interest Rate Products
  Other income   $ 2,444     $ 514  
Credit-Risk-Related Contingent Features
Citizens has agreements with its derivative counterparties that contain a provision where if Citizens defaults on any of its indebtedness, including a default where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, then it could also be declared in default on its derivative obligations. Citizens also has agreements with certain of its derivative counterparties that contain a provision where if it fails to maintain its status as a well/ adequate capitalized institution, then the counterparty could terminate the derivative positions and Citizens would be required to settle its obligations under the agreements.
Citizens has agreements with its derivative counterparties containing provisions that require its debt to maintain an investment grade credit rating from each of the major credit rating agencies. If Citizens’ credit rating is reduced below investment grade then a termination event shall have deemed to occur and the counterparty shall have the right to terminate all affected transactions under the agreement. As of March 31, 2009, the fair value of derivatives in a net liability position, which includes accrued interest but excludes any adjustment for nonperformance risk, related to these agreements was $25.7 million. As of March 31, 2009, Citizens had minimum collateral posting thresholds with certain of its derivative counterparties and has the right to reclaim collateral in the amount of $18.5 million. If Citizens had breached any of these provisions at March 31, 2009 it would have been required to settle its obligations under the agreements at the termination value and would have been required to pay any additional amounts due in excess of amounts previously posted as collateral with the respective counterparty. As permitted by FIN 39-1, Citizens does not offset fair value amounts recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral (a receivable) or the obligation to return cash collateral (a payable) against recognized fair value amounts of derivatives executed with the same counterparty under a master netting agreement.

23


Table of Contents

Note 16. Subsequent Event
On April 30, 2009 Chrysler LLC (“Chrysler”) filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection and announced that most of its manufacturing operations will be temporarily idled until the bankruptcy process is complete. While Citizens had no direct exposure to Chrysler at March 31, 2009, Citizens had approximately $45 million in commercial loan exposure to Chrysler’s tier one and tier two suppliers and dealerships. When making this determination, Citizens included manufacturers, tier one and tier two suppliers, and dealerships with at least 25% of their revenue dependent on Chrysler. Additionally, Citizens considered its risk associated with the U.S. based automotive industry in its calculation of the allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2009.

24


Table of Contents

Item 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Selected Quarterly Information
Citizens Republic Bancorp and Subsidiaries
                                         
    Three Months Ended
    March 31,   December 31,   September 30,   June 30,   March 31,
    2009   2008   2008   2008   2008
 
Summary of Operations (thousands)
                                       
Net interest income
  $ 76,946     $ 85,687     $ 87,318     $ 87,615     $ 88,312  
Provision for loan losses
    64,017       118,565       58,390       74,480       30,619  
Total fees and other income
    19,233       15,755       28,005       27,058       30,925  
Investment securities gains (losses)
          (1 )                  
Noninterest expense (1)
    80,778       78,611       74,301       261,228       76,562  
Income tax provision (benefit)
    (3,467 )     99,634       (10,192 )     (19,401 )     929  
Net income (loss) (2)
    (45,149 )     (195,369 )     (7,176 )     (201,634 )     11,127  
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders (3)
    (49,252 )     (195,596 )     (18,913 )     (201,634 )     11,127  
Taxable equivalent adjustment
    4,337       4,519       4,593       4,611       4,679  
Cash dividends on common stock
                            21,958  
 
Per Common Share Data
                                       
Basic net income
  $ (0.39 )   $ (1.56 )   $ (0.20 )   $ (2.53 )   $ 0.15  
Diluted net income
    (0.39 )     (1.56 )     (0.20 )     (2.53 )     0.15  
Cash dividends
                            0.290  
Market value (end of period)
    1.55       2.98       3.08       2.82       12.43  
Common shareholders’ equity (end of period)
    10.29       10.60       12.20       14.93       20.82  
 
At Period End (millions)
                                       
Assets
  $ 12,982     $ 13,086     $ 13,116     $ 13,170     $ 13,539  
Portfolio loans
    8,754       9,103       9,378       9,449       9,573  
Deposits
    9,120       9,052       9,006       8,661       8,487  
Shareholders’ equity
    1,567       1,601       1,537       1,546       1,577  
 
Average for the Quarter (millions)
                                       
Assets
  $ 13,080     $ 13,074     $ 13,157     $ 13,296     $ 13,442  
Portfolio loans
    8,908       9,267       9,456       9,514       9,499  
Deposits
    9,117       8,998       8,837       8,604       8,417  
Shareholders’ equity
    1,607       1,559       1,551       1,546       1,579  
 
Ratios (annualized)
                                       
Return on average assets
    (1.40 )%     (5.94 )%     (0.22 )%     (6.10 )%     0.33 %
Return on average shareholders’ equity
    (11.40 )     (49.86 )     (1.84 )     (52.47 )     2.83  
Average equity to average assets
    12.28       11.92       11.79       11.62       11.74  
Net interest margin (FTE) (4)
    2.73       3.03       3.09       3.11       3.12  
Efficiency ratio (5)
    80.36       74.19       61.96       219.00       61.79  
Net loans charged off to average portfolio loans
    1.67       3.48       0.94       2.93       0.74  
Allowance for loan losses to portfolio loans
    3.23       2.80       2.32       1.92       1.84  
Allowance for loan loss as a percent of nonperforming loans
    65.94       83.43       94.13       130.54       69.64  
Allowance for loan loss as a percent of nonperforming assets
    51.33       58.13       59.75       63.55       54.05  
Nonperforming assets to portfolio loans plus ORAA (end of period)
    6.25       4.79       3.87       3.01       3.39  
Nonperforming assets to total assets (end of period)
    4.24       3.36       2.78       2.17       2.41  
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (6)
                0.46             1.32  
Leverage ratio
    9.32       9.66       8.76       8.71       7.40  
Tier 1 capital ratio
    12.16       12.21       10.88       10.80       9.04  
Total capital ratio
    14.21       14.49       13.13       13.03       11.26  
 
(1)   Noninterest expense includes a goodwill impairment charge of $178.1 million in the second quarter of 2008.
 
(2)   Net income (loss) includes a deferred tax valuation allowance of $136.6 million in the fourth quarter of 2008.
 
(3)   Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders includes a dividend on redeemable preferred stock in the amount of: $4.1 million, $0.2 million, and $11.7 million in the first quarter of 2009, the fourth quarter of 2008, and the third quarter of 2008, respectively.
 
(4)   Net interest margin is presented on an annual basis, includes taxable equivalent adjustments to interest income and is based on a tax rate of 35%.
 
(5)   The Efficiency Ratio measures how efficiently a bank spends its revenues. The formula is: Noninterest expense/(Net interest income + Taxable equivalent adjustment + Total fees and other income).
 
(6)   Earnings represent net income from continuing operations before income tax provision. Fixed charges, excluding interest on deposits, include interest on short-term borrowings and long term debt, amortization of debt expense and one-third of net rental expense (which we believe is representative of the interest factor). For the quarters ended March 31, 2009, December 31, 2008, September 30, 2008, and June 30, 2008 earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges by $48.6 million, $95.7 million, $17.4 million, and $221.0 million, respectively.

25


Table of Contents

Introduction
The following commentary presents management’s discussion and analysis of Citizens Republic Bancorp, Inc.’s financial condition and results of operations for the three month period ended March 31, 2009. It should be read in conjunction with the unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes included elsewhere in this report and the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes contained in the Corporation’s 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition, the following discussion and analysis should be read together with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” contained in Citizens’ 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K, which contains important additional information that is necessary to understand the Corporation and its financial condition and results of operations for the periods covered by this report. Unless the context indicates otherwise, all references in the discussion to “Citizens” or the “Corporation” refer to Citizens Republic Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiaries. References to the “Holding Company” refer solely to Citizens Republic Bancorp, Inc.
Forward – Looking Statements
Discussions and statements in this report that are not statements of historical fact, including without limitation statements that include terms such as “will,” “may,” “should,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project,” “intend,” and “plan,” and statements regarding Citizens’ future financial and operating results, plans, objectives, expectations and intentions, are forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond Citizens’ control or are subject to change. No forward-looking statement is a guarantee of future performance and actual results could differ materially.
Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, without limitation, the following:
  Citizens faces the risk that loan losses, including unanticipated loan losses due to changes in loan portfolios, fraud and economic factors, could exceed the allowance for loan losses and that additional increases in the allowance will be required. Additions to the allowance for loan losses would cause Citizens’ net income to decline and could have a negative impact on its capital and financial position.
  While Citizens attempts to manage the risk from changes in market interest rates, interest rate risk management techniques are not exact. In addition, Citizens may not be able to economically hedge its interest rate risk. A rapid or substantial increase or decrease in interest rates could adversely affect Citizens’ net interest income and results of operations.
  Difficult economic conditions have adversely affected the banking industry and financial markets generally and may significantly affect Citizens’ business, financial condition, and results of operations.
  An economic downturn, and the negative economic effects caused by terrorist attacks, potential attacks and other destabilizing events, would likely contribute to the deterioration of the quality of Citizens’ loan portfolio and could reduce its customer base, its level of deposits, and demand for its financial products such as loans.
  If Citizens is unable to continue to attract and retain core deposits, to obtain third party financing on favorable terms, or to have access to interbank or other liquidity sources (as a result of rating agency downgrades or other market factors), its cost of funds will increase, adversely affecting its ability to generate the funds necessary for lending operations, reducing net interest margin and negatively affecting its results of operations.
  Increased competition with other financial institutions or an adverse change in Citizens’ relationship with a number of major customers could reduce its net interest margin and net income by decreasing the number and size of loans originated, the interest rates charged on these loans and the fees charged for services to customers. If Citizens lends to customers who are less likely to pay in order to maintain historical origination levels, it may not be able to maintain current loan quality levels.
  Events such as significant adverse changes in the business climate, adverse action by a regulator, unanticipated changes in the competitive environment, and a decision to change Citizens’ operations or dispose of an operating unit could have a negative effect on its goodwill or other intangible assets such that it may need to record an impairment charge, which could have a material adverse impact on its results of operations.
  If the FDIC raises the assessment rate charged to its insured financial institutions, our FDIC insurance premium may increase and this could have a negative effect on our expenses and results of operations.
  Citizens may not realize its deferred income tax assets.
  Citizens’ stock price can be volatile.
  The trading volume in Citizens’ common stock is less than that of other larger financial services companies.

26


Table of Contents

  If Citizens’ stock does not continue to be traded on an established exchange, an active trading market may not continue and the trading price of its stock may decline.
  An investment in Citizens’ common stock is not an insured deposit.
  Citizens may be adversely affected by the soundness of other financial institutions.
  Citizens could face unanticipated environmental liabilities or costs related to real property owned or acquired through foreclosure. Compliance with federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations, including those related to investigation and clean-up of contaminated sites, could have a negative effect on expenses and results of operations.
  Citizens is a party to various lawsuits incidental to its business. Litigation is subject to many uncertainties such that the expenses and ultimate exposure with respect to many of these matters cannot be ascertained.
  The financial services industry is undergoing rapid technological changes. If Citizens is unable to adequately invest in and implement new technology-driven products and services, it may not be able to compete effectively, or the cost to provide products and services may increase significantly.
  Citizens’ business may be adversely affected by the highly regulated environment in which it operates. Changes in banking or tax laws, regulations, and regulatory practices at either the federal or state level may adversely affect Citizens, including its ability to offer new products and services, obtain financing, pay dividends from its subsidiaries to its parent company, attract deposits, or make loans at satisfactory spreads. Such changes may also result in the imposition of additional costs.
  The products and services offered by the banking industry and customer expectations regarding them are subject to change. Citizens attempts to respond to perceived customer needs and expectations by offering new products and services, which are often costly to develop and market initially. A lack of market acceptance of these products and services would have a negative effect on its financial condition and results of operations.
  As a bank holding company that conducts substantially all of its operations through its subsidiaries, the ability of Citizens’ parent company to pay dividends, repurchase its shares or to repay its indebtedness depends upon the results of operations of its subsidiaries and their ability to pay dividends to the parent company. Dividends paid by these subsidiaries are subject to limits imposed by federal and state law.
  New accounting or tax pronouncements or interpretations may be issued by the accounting profession, regulators or other government bodies which could change existing accounting methods. Changes in accounting methods could negatively impact Citizens’ results of operations and financial condition.
  Citizens’ business continuity plans or data security systems could prove to be inadequate, resulting in a material interruption in, or disruption to, its business and a negative impact on its results of operations.
  Citizens’ vendors could fail to fulfill their contractual obligations, resulting in a material interruption in, or disruption to, its business and a negative impact on its results of operations.
  Citizens’ potential inability to integrate acquired operations could have a negative effect on its expenses and results of operations.
  Citizens’ controls and procedures may fail or be circumvented which could have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations and financial condition.
  Citizens’ articles of incorporation and bylaws as well as certain banking laws may have an anti-takeover effect.
These factors also include risks and uncertainties detailed from time to time in Citizens’ other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), such as the risk factors listed in “Item 1A, Risk Factors,” of Citizens’ 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K and this Form 10-Q, which are available at the SEC’s web site www.sec.gov. Other factors not currently anticipated may also materially and adversely affect Citizens’ results of operations, cash flows, financial position and prospects. There can be no assurance that future results will meet expectations. While Citizens believes that the forward-looking statements in this release are reasonable, you should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement. In addition, these statements speak only as of the date made. Citizens does not undertake, and expressly disclaims any obligation to update or alter any statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.
Critical Accounting Policies
Citizens’ Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and follow general practices within the industry in which the Corporation operates. Application of these principles requires management to make estimates, assumptions, and complex judgments that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes.

27


Table of Contents

These estimates, assumptions and judgments are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements; accordingly, as this information changes, the financial statements could reflect different estimates, assumptions and judgments. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. Certain policies inherently have a greater reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions, and judgments and as such, have a greater possibility of producing results that could be materially different than originally reported. Estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change include those relating to the allowance for loan losses, goodwill impairment, the benefit obligation and net periodic pension expense for employee pension plans, fair value measurements, derivative financial instruments and hedging activities, and income taxes. Citizens believes that these estimates and the related policies are important to the portrayal of the Corporation’s financial condition and results of operations. Therefore, management considers them to be critical accounting policies and discusses them directly with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. Citizens’ significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 1 to the audited Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Corporation’s 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K and the more significant assumptions and estimates made by management are more fully described in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Policies” in the Corporation’s 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Derivative Financial Instruments
On January 1, 2009, Citizens adopted SFAS 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133,” which enhances required disclosures regarding derivatives and hedging activities, including enhanced disclosures regarding how (a) an entity uses derivative instruments; (b) derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” and (c) derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. The adoption of SFAS 161 had no impact on Citizens’ financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity. Refer to Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements for additional disclosures. A number of valuation techniques are used to determine the fair value of derivatives and hedges in Citizens’ financial statements. These include quoted market prices for securities and interest rate swap valuations based upon the modeling of termination values adjusted for credit spreads with counterparties. Significant changes in the aggregate fair value of derivatives and hedges required to be measured at fair value or for impairment will be recognized in the income statement under the framework established by GAAP. If an impairment is determined, it could limit the ability of Citizens’ banking subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other payments to the Holding Company. See Note 15 to the unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements in this report for more information on fair value measurements.
Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
In addition to results presented in accordance with GAAP, “Item 2 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” includes non-GAAP financial measures such as the efficiency ratio, tangible equity to tangible assets ratio, and tangible common equity to tangible assets ratio. Citizens believes these non-GAAP financial measures provide information useful to investors in understanding the underlying operational performance of the Corporation, its business, and performance trends and facilitates performance comparisons with others in the banking industry. Specifically, Citizens believes the exclusion of goodwill and other intangible assets, net of applicable deferred tax amounts, to create “average tangible assets” and “average tangible equity” facilitates the comparison of results for ongoing business operations. Citizens’ management internally assesses the Corporation’s performance based, in part, on these non-GAAP financial measures.
 
Non-GAAP Reconciliation
Citizens Republic Bancorp and Subsidiaries
                                         
(dollars in thousands)   1st Qtr 2009     4th Qtr 2008     3rd Qtr 2008     2nd Qtr 2008     1st Qtr 2008  
 
Net Interest Income (A)
  $ 76,946     $ 85,687     $ 87,318     $ 87,615     $ 88,312  
Taxable Equivalent Adjustment (B)
    4,337       4,519       4,593       4,611       4,679  
Noninterest Income (C)
    19,233       15,754       28,005       27,058       30,925  
Noninterest Expense (D)
    80,778       78,611       74,301       261,228       76,562  
 
                                       
Efficiency Ratio: D/(A+B+C)
    80.36 %     74.19 %     61.96 %     219.00 %     61.79 %
           

28


Table of Contents

                                         
    Mar 31, 2009     Dec 31, 2008     Sep 30, 2008     Jun 30, 2008     Mar 31, 2008  
 
Ending Balances (millions)
                                       
Assets
  $ 12,982     $ 13,086     $ 13,116     $ 13,170     $ 13,539  
Goodwill
    (597 )     (597 )     (597 )     (597 )     (775 )
Core deposit intangible assets
    (19 )     (21 )     (24 )     (26 )     (28 )
Deferred taxes
    7       7       8       9       10  
 
                             
Tangible assets
  $ 12,373     $ 12,475     $ 12,503     $ 12,556     $ 12,746  
 
                             
 
                                       
Equity
  $ 1,567     $ 1,601     $ 1,537     $ 1,546     $ 1,577  
Goodwill
    (597 )     (597 )     (597 )     (597 )     (775 )
Core deposit intangible assets
    (19 )     (21 )     (24 )     (26 )     (28 )
Deferred taxes
    7       7       8       9       10  
 
                             
Tangible equity
  $ 958     $ 990     $ 924     $ 932     $ 784  
 
                             
 
                                       
Tangible equity
  $ 958     $ 990     $ 924     $ 932     $ 784  
Preferred Stock
    (268 )     (266 )           (114 )      
 
                             
Tangible common equity
  $ 690     $ 724     $ 924     $ 818     $ 784  
 
                             
 
                                       
Equity to Assets
    12.07 %     12.24 %     11.72 %     11.74 %     11.65 %
Tangible Equity to Tangible Assets
    7.74       7.93       7.39       7.42       6.15  
Tangible Common Equity to Tangible Assets
    5.58       5.80       7.39       6.51       6.15  
           
Although Citizens believes the above non-GAAP financial measures enhance investors’ understanding of its business and performance, these non-GAAP measures should not be considered a substitute for GAAP basis financial measures.
Results of Operations
Summary
Citizens reported a net loss of $45.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009, compared with net income of $11.1 million for the first quarter of 2008. The decrease was primarily the result of lower net interest income, higher provision for loan losses, and lower noninterest income in 2009. After incorporating the $4.1 million dividend to the preferred shareholders, Citizens reported a net loss attributable to common shareholders of $49.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009. Diluted net income (loss) per share was $(0.39), compared with $0.15 for the first quarter of 2008. Annualized returns on average assets and average equity during the first quarter of 2009 were (1.40)% and (11.40)%, respectively, compared with 0.33% and 2.83% for the first quarter of 2008.
The decline in real estate markets and deterioration in the credit environment continue to negatively impact Citizens’ operations. The provision for loan losses for the first quarter of 2009 was $64.0 million, compared with $30.6 million for the first quarter of 2008. Net charge-offs for the first quarter of 2009 totaled $36.7 million, compared with $17.4 million for the first quarter of 2008. The significant increases in the provision for loan losses and net charge-offs were primarily due to higher charge-offs on nonperforming commercial real estate loans due to declining real estate values and general economic deterioration in the Midwest. Additionally, the increase in the provision for loan losses reflects a higher level of nonperforming loans. As loans are migrated to nonperforming status, the underlying collateral is re-evaluated to determine the likelihood that some or all of these loans may eventually be charged-off.
Total assets at March 31, 2009 were $13.0 billion, essentially unchanged from December 31, 2008 and a decrease of $557.0 million or 4.1% from March 31, 2008. The decrease from March 31, 2008 was primarily the result of reductions in all loan portfolios, the effect of the fourth quarter of 2008 deferred tax valuation allowance and the second quarter of 2008 goodwill impairment, partially offset by higher investment securities balances. Total deposits at March 31, 2009 were $9.1 billion, up slightly over December 31, 2008 and an increase of $632.5 million or 7.5% over March 31, 2008. The increases were primarily the result of clients holding higher balances in transaction accounts and recent changes in FDIC coverage thresholds as well as a strategic shift in funding mix from short-term borrowings to longer-term retail certificates of deposit due to deposit generation campaigns.
Citizens maintains a very strong liquidity position due to its on-balance sheet liquidity sources and very stable funding base comprised of approximately 70% deposits, 16% long-term debt, 12% equity, and 2% short-term liabilities. Citizens also has access to high levels of untapped liquidity through collateral-based borrowing capacity provided by portions of both the loan and investment securities portfolios. Additionally, money market investments and securities available-for-sale could be sold for cash to provide liquidity.
Citizens continues to maintain a strong capital position, and its regulatory capital ratios are above “well-capitalized” standards, as evidenced by the following key capital ratios.
                                         
    Regulatory                            
    Minimum for                           Excess Capital
    “Well-                           over Minimum
    Capitalized”   3/31/09   12/31/08   9/30/08   (in millions)
Tier 1 capital ratio
    6.00 %     12.16 %     12.21 %     10.88 %   $ 587.9  
Total capital ratio
    10.00       14.21       14.49       13.13       402.3  
Tier 1 leverage ratio
    5.00       9.32       9.66       8.76       537.8  
Tangible equity to tangible assets1
            7.74       7.93       7.39          
Tangible common equity to tangible assets1
            5.58       5.80       7.39          
 
1   Tangible common equity, tangible equity, and tangible assets exclude goodwill and core deposit intangible assets, net of tax.
 
    This amount totaled $0.6 million for March 31, 2009, December 31, 2008, and September 30, 2008.
Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin
An analysis of net interest income, interest spread and net interest margin with average balances and related interest rates for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 is presented below.

29


Table of Contents

Average Balances/Net Interest Income/Average Rates
                                                 
    2009     2008  
Three Months Ended March 31,   Average             Average     Average             Average  
(dollars in thousands)   Balance     Interest(1)     Rate(2)     Balance     Interest (1)     Rate (2)  
 
Earning Assets
                                               
Money market investments
  $ 426,824     $ 263       0.25 %   $ 4,490     $ 30       2.66 %
Investment securities (3):
                                               
Taxable
    1,738,346       21,912       5.04       1,528,754       21,023       5.50  
Tax-exempt
    651,797       6,957       6.57       678,699       7,370       6.68  
FHLB and Federal Reserve stock
    148,763       1,366       3.71       148,840       1,693       4.57  
Portfolio Loans (4):
                                               
Commercial and industrial
    2,485,161       27,928       4.65       2,564,023       37,146       5.93  
Commercial real estate
    2,944,144       38,760       5.34       3,142,244       53,887       6.90  
Residential mortgage
    1,237,705       16,949       5.48       1,417,712       22,963       6.48  
Direct consumer
    1,431,983       21,542       6.10       1,553,348       27,906       7.23  
Indirect consumer
    809,025       13,511       6.77       821,882       13,869       6.79  
 
                                       
Total portfolio loans
    8,908,018       118,690       5.42       9,499,209       155,771       6.62  
Loans held for sale
    93,379       501       2.15       74,057       1,230       6.63  
 
                                       
Total earning assets (3)
    11,967,127       149,689       5.20       11,934,049       187,117       6.45  
 
                                               
Nonearning Assets
                                               
Cash and due from banks
    173,181                       205,102                  
Bank premises and equipment
    123,573                       130,216                  
Investment security fair value adjustment
    (6,471 )                     32,294                  
Other nonearning assets
    1,083,358                       1,306,441                  
Allowance for loan losses
    (260,483 )                     (165,815 )                
 
                                           
Total assets
  $ 13,080,285                     $ 13,442,287                  
 
                                           
 
                                               
Interest-Bearing Liabilities
                                               
Deposits:
                                               
Interest-bearing demand
  $ 823,161     $ 930       0.46 %   $ 776,756     $ 1,269       0.66 %
Savings deposits
    2,596,840       5,965       0.93       2,412,725       14,249       2.38  
Time deposits
    4,548,786       40,245       3.59       4,137,557       46,060       4.48  
Short-term borrowings
    71,374       67       0.38       632,655       4,971       3.16  
Long-term debt
    2,116,545       25,536       4.88       2,665,362       32,256       4.86  
 
                                       
Total interest-bearing liabilities
    10,156,706       72,743       2.90       10,625,055       98,805       3.74  
Noninterest-Bearing Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
                                               
Noninterest-bearing demand
    1,148,419                       1,090,255                  
Other liabilities
    168,525                       148,339                  
Shareholders’ equity
    1,606,635                       1,578,638                  
 
                                           
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  $ 13,080,285                     $ 13,442,287                  
 
                                           
Net Interest Income
          $ 76,946                     $ 88,312          
 
                                           
Interest Spread (5)
                    2.30 %                     2.71 %
Contribution of noninterest bearing sources of funds
                    0.43                       0.41  
 
                                           
 
                                               
Net Interest Margin (5)(6)
                    2.73 %                     3.12 %
 
                                           
 
(1)   Interest income is shown on actual basis and does not include taxable equivalent adjustments.
 
(2)   Average rates are presented on an annual basis and include taxable equivalent adjustments to interest income of $4.3 million and $4.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, based on a tax rate of 35%.
 
(3)   For presentation in this table, average balances and the corresponding average rates for investment securities are based upon historical cost, adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts.
 
(4)   Nonaccrual loans are included in average balances for each applicable loan category.
 
(5)   The interest spread and net interest margin are presented on a tax-equivalent basis.
 
(6)   Because noninterest-bearing funding sources, demand deposits, other liabilities and shareholders’ equity also support earning assets, the net interest margin exceeds the interest spread.

30


Table of Contents

Average interest rates, net interest spread, and net interest margin are presented in “Item 2 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” on a fully taxable equivalent basis. This presentations is customary in the banking industry because it permits comparability of yields on both taxable and tax-exempt sources of interest income.
The decrease in net interest margin from the first quarter of 2008 was primarily the result of deposit price competition, the transfer of loans to nonperforming status, and an increase in funding costs related to extending short-term borrowings, partially offset by expanding commercial and consumer loan spreads and retail time deposits repricing to a lower rate.
Net interest income was $76.9 million for the first quarter of 2009 compared with $88.3 million for the first quarter of 2008. The decrease was due to the lower net interest margin.
The table below shows changes in interest income, interest expense and net interest income due to volume and rate variances for major categories of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.
Analysis of Changes in Interest Income and Interest Expense
                         
    Three Months Ended March 31,  
            Increase (Decrease)  
2009 compared with 2008   Net     Due to Change in  
(in thousands)   Change(1)     Rate(2)     Volume(2)  
 
Interest Income on Earning Assets:
                       
Money market investments
  $ 233     $ (52 )   $ 285  
Investment securities:
                       
Taxable
    889       (1,844 )     2,733  
Tax-exempt
    (413 )     (124 )     (289 )
FHLB and Federal Reserve stock
    (327 )     (326 )     (1 )
Loans:
                       
Commercial and industrial
    (9,218 )     (8,106 )     (1,112 )
Commercial real estate
    (15,127 )     (11,898 )     (3,229 )
Residential mortgage loans
    (6,014 )     (3,302 )     (2,712 )
Direct consumer
    (6,364 )     (4,299 )     (2,065 )
Indirect consumer
    (358 )     (142 )     (216 )
 
                 
Total portfolio loans
    (37,081 )     (27,747 )     (9,334 )
Loans held for sale
    (729 )     (989 )     260  
 
                 
Total
    (37,428 )     (31,082 )     (6,346 )
 
                 
Interest Expense on Interest-Bearing Liabilities:
                       
Deposits:
                       
Interest-bearing demand
    (339 )     (411 )     72  
Savings
    (8,284 )     (9,298 )     1,014  
Time
    (5,815 )     (10,086 )     4,271  
Short-term borrowings
    (4,904 )     (2,443 )     (2,461 )
Long-term debt
    (6,720 )     (98 )     (6,622 )
 
                 
Total
    (26,062 )     (22,336 )     (3,726 )
 
                 
Net Interest Income
  $ (11,366 )   $ (8,746 )   $ (2,620 )
 
                 
 
(1)   Changes are based on actual interest income and do not reflect taxable equivalent adjustments.
 
(2)   The change in interest not solely due to changes in volume or rates has been allocated in proportion to the absolute dollar amounts of the change in each.
The decrease in net interest income from the first quarter of 2008 reflects rate variances that were unfavorable in the aggregate and volume variances that were unfavorable in the aggregate. The unfavorable rate variance was primarily the result of lower market interest rates in 2009 and deposit price competition, partially offset by expanding commercial and consumer loan spreads. The unfavorable volume variance was primarily due to weak customer demand in all loan categories, growth in the commercial on-balance sheet sweep product and an increase in retail and brokered time deposits due to a strategic shift in the funding mix. This was partially offset by an increase in the investment securities and money market investment portfolios as a result of using the proceeds from the preferred stock issuance in the fourth quarter of 2008 and a decrease in short-term borrowings and long-term debt due to the aforementioned shift in funding.

31


Table of Contents

Noninterest Income
Noninterest income for the first quarter of 2009 was $19.2 million, a decrease of $11.7 million from the first quarter of 2008.
Noninterest Income
                                 
    Three Months Ended        
    March 31,     Change in 2009  
(dollars in thousands)   2009     2008     Amount     Percent  
 
Service charges on deposit accounts
  $ 10,268     $ 11,466     $ (1,198 )     (10.5 )%
Trust fees
    3,419       4,784       (1,365 )     (28.5 )
Mortgage and other loan income
    3,079       3,344       (265 )     (7.9 )
Brokerage and investment fees
    1,327       1,916       (589 )     (30.7 )
ATM network user fees
    1,454       1,413       41       2.9  
Bankcard fees
    1,894       1,744       150       8.6  
Gains (losses) on loans held for sale
    (6,152 )     1       (6,153 )     N/M  
Other income
    3,944       6,257       (2,313 )     (37.0 )
 
                         
Total noninterest income
  $ 19,233     $ 30,925     $ (11,692 )     (37.8 )
 
                         
 
N/M — Not Meaningful
The decrease in noninterest income from the first quarter of 2008 was primarily due to a net loss on loans held for sale ($6.2 million), as well as lower other income ($2.3 million), trust fees ($1.4 million), and service charges on deposit accounts ($1.2 million). The net loss on loans held for sale was primarily the result of marking the loan value down to market based on lower updated appraisal values for the underlying collateral. The decrease in other income was primarily the result of a $2.1 million gain due to Citizens’ receipt of proceeds from the partial redemption of its Visa shares during the first quarter of 2008, a reduced crediting rate related to bank owned life insurance as a result of decreased returns on the underlying investments, and decreased fee income related to off-balance sheet sweep products, partially offset by a $2.7 million swap income recognition resulting from changes in the related credit spreads. The decrease in trust fees was primarily the result of recent negative market conditions. The decrease in service charges on deposit accounts was primarily the result of a decline in customer transaction volume.
Noninterest Expense
Noninterest expense for the first quarter of 2009 was $80.8 million, an increase of $4.2 million over the first quarter of 2008.
Noninterest Expense
                                 
    Three Months Ended        
    March 31,     Change in 2009  
(dollars in thousands)   2009     2008     Amount     Percent  
 
Salaries and employee benefits
  $ 33,917     $ 42,225     $ (8,308 )     (19.7 )%
Occupancy
    7,923       7,675       248       3.2  
Professional services
    3,136       3,763       (627 )     (16.7 )
Equipment
    2,850       3,230       (380 )     (11.8 )
Data processing services
    4,274       4,304       (30 )     (0.7 )
Advertising and public relations
    1,425       1,838       (413 )     (22.5 )
Postage and delivery
    1,575       1,727       (152 )     (8.8 )
Other loan expenses
    5,937       1,811       4,126       227.8  
Other real estate (ORE) expenses
    8,360       1,242       7,118       573.1  
Intangible asset amortization
    2,037       2,447       (410 )     (16.8 )
Other expenses
    9,344       6,300       3,044       48.3  
 
                         
Total noninterest expense
  $ 80,778     $ 76,562     $ 4,216       5.5  
 
                         
 
N/M — Not Meaningful
The increase in noninterest expense over the first quarter of 2008 was primarily the result of higher other real estate (ORE) expenses ($7.1 million), other loan expenses ($4.1 million), and other expense ($3.0 million). The increase in ORE expenses was primarily the result of owning more repossessed properties and marking ORE assets down to market value based on lower updated appraisal values for the underlying collateral. The increase in other loan expense was primarily the result of higher mortgage processing fees due to the alliance with PHH Mortgage entered into in the first quarter of 2008 and higher foreclosure expenses associated with repossessing collateral underlying commercial and residential real estate loans. The increase in other expense was primarily due to the industry-wide increase in FDIC insurance premiums, partially offset by a reduction in telephone expense due to implementing cost-saving initiatives.

32


Table of Contents

Salary costs included severance expense of less than $0.1 million for the first quarter of 2009 and $1.6 million for the first quarter of 2008. Citizens had 2,175 full-time equivalent employees at March 31, 2009 compared with 2,409 at March 31, 2008.
     FDIC Assessments
In December 2008, the FDIC finalized a rule to increase the assessment rate for all insured institutions by 7 cents for every $100 of qualifying deposits in order to maintain a strong funding position and restore reserve ratios for the deposit insurance fund. This increase was included in Citizens’ first quarter of 2009 noninterest expense. Beginning April 1, 2009, additional rule changes will require institutions to pay their premiums using a risk-weighted factor which is expected to increase future FDIC insurance premiums.
Additionally, on February 27, 2009, the FDIC voted to impose an emergency special assessment of 20 cents for every $100 of deposits at June 30, 2009, which would be payable on September 30, 2009. Potential additional emergency special assessments of up to 10 cents for every $100 of deposits may be charged at the end of any calendar quarter thereafter. These interim rules were subject to a 30-day comment period. As of the filing date of this Form 10-Q, the FDIC has not issued its final rules regarding the special assessments. If affirmed, Citizens will accrue for the entire special assessment payable on September 30, 2009 during the second quarter of 2009.
Citizens cannot provide any assurance as to the ultimate amount or timing of any such emergency special assessments, should such special assessments occur, as such special assessments are dependent upon a variety of factors which are beyond Citizens’ control.
Income Taxes
The income tax provision (benefit) for the first quarter of 2009 was $(3.5) million, compared with $0.9 million for the first quarter of 2008. The decrease was primarily due to the effect of lower pre-tax income and current period adjustments to other comprehensive income.
Lines of Business Results
Citizens monitors financial performance using an internal profitability measurement system, which provides line of business results and key performance measures. Business line results are divided into four major business segments: Specialty Commercial, Regional Banking, Wealth Management and Other. For additional information about each line of business, see Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation’s 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K and Note 13 to the unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements in this report. A summary of net income by each business line is presented below.
                 
    Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
(in thousands)   2009     2008  
 
Specialty Commercial
  $ (14,514 )   $ (4,506 )
Regional Banking
    2,562       17,506  
Wealth Management
    515       978  
Other
    (33,712 )     (2,851 )
 
           
Net Income
  $ (45,149 )   $ 11,127  
 
           
Specialty Commercial
Net income declined in the three month period ended March 31, 2009 as compared with the same period of the prior year. The decrease was primarily the result of higher provision for loan losses related to increased levels of nonperforming commercial real estate loans. Noninterest income also decreased primarily due to a loss on loans held for sale as a result of marking the assets down to market value based on lower updated appraisal values for underlying collateral. Net interest income and noninterest expense were essentially unchanged for the three month period.

33


Table of Contents

Regional Banking
Net income declined for the three month period ended March 31, 2009 as compared with the same period of the prior year. The decrease was a result of higher provision for loan losses, lower net interest income, lower noninterest income and higher noninterest expense. The increase in provision for loan losses was primarily the result of higher net charge-offs related to the home equity and commercial loan portfolios. The decrease in net interest income was primarily the result of a reduction in loan balances due to weak customer demand, deposit price competition in Citizens’ markets and an increase in loan balances transferring to nonperforming status. Noninterest income declined due to lower service charges on deposit accounts. Noninterest expense increased because of higher mortgage processing fees due to the alliance with PHH Mortgage entered into in the first quarter of 2008 and the industry-wide increase in FDIC insurance rates. The effect of those expense items was partially offset by a decrease in salaries and employee benefits as result of lower staffing levels.
Wealth Management
Net income declined for the period ended March 31, 2009 as compared with the same period of the prior year. The decrease was primarily the result of lower noninterest income partially offset by a decline in noninterest expense. The decrease in noninterest income was primarily the result of lower trust fees due to declines in market valuation for these assets since the first quarter of 2008, as well as a decrease in brokerage income from lower demand for investment products. The decrease in noninterest expense was primarily due to lower salary expense as result of lower staffing levels. Trust assets under administration were $1.8 billion at March 31, 2009, a decrease of $0.7 billion from March 31, 2008.
Other
Net income decrease in the three month period ended March 31, 2009 as compared with the same period of the prior year. The decline was the result of lower net interest income, a higher provision for loan losses, lower noninterest income and higher noninterest expense. The decrease in net interest income was primarily the result of the internal profitability methodology utilized at Citizens that insulates the other lines of business from interest-rate risk and assigns the risk to the asset/liability management function, which is a component of this segment. The decline in net interest income was partially offset by higher short-term investment balances. The increase in the provision for loan losses was primarily the result of higher net charge-offs on indirect consumer loans and the continued migration of loans to nonperforming status. This migration, and Citizens’ evaluation of the underlying collateral supporting these loans, caused an increase in the allowance for loan losses due to the higher likelihood that portions of these loans may eventually be charged-off. The decrease in noninterest income was primarily the result of a gain relating to the partial redemption of Citizens’ Visa shares during the first quarter of 2008. The increase in noninterest expense was primarily due to an increase in ORE expenses partially offset by lower compensation expense.
Financial Condition
Total assets at March 31, 2009 were $13.0 billion, essentially unchanged from December 31, 2008 and a decrease of $557.0 million or 4.1% from March 31, 2008. The decrease from March 31, 2008 was primarily the result of reductions in all loan portfolios, the effect of the fourth quarter of 2008 deferred tax valuation allowance and the second quarter of 2008 goodwill impairment, partially offset by higher investment securities balances.
Investment Securities
Investment securities at March 31, 2009 totaled $2.4 billion, essentially unchanged from December 31, 2008 and an increase of $191.8 million or 8.6% over March 31, 2008. The increase over March 31, 2008 was primarily the result of investing the proceeds from the fourth quarter of 2008 participation in the TARP Capital Purchase Program into securities that can be pledged as collateral for funding of future loans, partially offset by using portfolio cash flow to reduce short-term borrowings. Citizens did not have any other-than-temporary impairment charges during the first quarter of 2009. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on investment securities.
Portfolio Loans
Total portfolio loans were $8.8 billion at March 31, 2009, a decrease of $348.1 million or 3.8% from December 31, 2008 and a decrease of $818.3 million or 8.5% from March 31, 2008.
The following definitions are provided to clarify the types of loans included in each of the commercial real estate segments identified in the table below. Land hold loans are secured by undeveloped land which has been acquired for future development.

34


Table of Contents

Land development loans are secured by land being developed in terms of infrastructure improvements to create finished marketable lots for commercial or residential construction. Construction loans are secured by commercial, retail and residential real estate in the construction phase with the intent to be sold or become an income producing property. Income producing loans are secured by non-owner occupied real estate leased to one or more tenants. Owner occupied loans are secured by real estate occupied by the owner for ongoing operations.
Commercial Loan Portfolio
                                         
    Mar 31     Dec 31     Sep 30     Jun 30     Mar 31  
(in millions)   2009     2008     2008     2008     2008  
Land Hold
  $ 54.2     $ 45.0     $ 48.3     $ 49.8     $ 61.6  
Land Development
    121.2       132.7       125.0       128.2       159.2  
Construction
    257.7       263.5       364.2       344.1       370.7  
Income Producing
    1,558.2       1,556.2       1,533.2       1,569.9       1,567.3  
Owner-Occupied
    953.0       967.3       999.6       1,009.3       1,015.6  
 
                             
Total Commercial Real Estate
    2,944.3       2,964.7       3,070.3       3,101.3       3,174.4  
Commercial and Industrial
    2,394.4       2,602.4       2,703.7       2,703.8       2,653.8  
 
                             
Total Commercial Loans
  $ 5,338.7     $ 5,567.1     $ 5,774.0     $ 5,805.1     $ 5,828.2  
 
                             
Total commercial loans at March 31, 2009 were $5.3 billion, a decrease of $228.4 million or 4.1% over December 31, 2008 and a decrease of $489.5 million or 8.4% from March 31, 2008. The decrease from December 31, 2008 was primarily the result of a decline in customer demand, especially in the Michigan markets. The decrease from March 31, 2008 was primarily the result of the decline in customer demand, reducing loans with narrow margins, increased charge-off levels since March 31, 2008, and transferring $86.2 million of nonperforming commercial real estate loans to loans held for sale during the second quarter of 2008, partially offset by new relationships during 2008.
Residential mortgage loans at March 31, 2009 decreased $54.9 million or 4.3% from December 31, 2008 to $1.2 billion and decreased $185.8 million or 13.3% from March 31, 2008. The decline was primarily the result of the continued strategy of selling more than 90% of new mortgage originations into the secondary market. Additionally, the decrease from March 31, 2008 includes the effect of transferring $41.7 million of nonperforming residential mortgage loans to loans held for sale during the second quarter of 2008.
Direct consumer loans, which include direct installment, home equity, and other consumer loans, decreased $46.5 million or 3.2% from December 31, 2008 and decreased $126.2 million or 8.2% from March 31, 2008. Indirect consumer loans, which are primarily marine and recreational vehicle loans, at March 31, 2009 totaled $802.1 million, a decrease of $18.4 million or 2.2% from December 31, 2008 and a decrease of $16.8 million or 2.1% from March 31, 2008. The decreases for both portfolios were due to weak consumer demand.
Credit Quality
The quality of Citizens’ loan portfolio is impacted by numerous factors, including the economic environment in the markets in which Citizens operates. Citizens carefully monitors its loans in an effort to identify and mitigate any potential credit quality issues and losses in a proactive manner. In the first quarter of 2009, Citizens further expanded the non-watch commercial credit review of automotive and real estate related credits to include other manufacturers and relationships with significant credit exposure. This process seeks to validate each such credit’s risk rating, underwriting structure and exposure management under current and stressed economic scenarios.
The following tables represent five qualitative aspects of the loan portfolio that illustrate the overall level of risk inherent in the loan portfolio.
  Delinquency Rates by Loan Portfolio — This table illustrates the loans where the contractual payment is 30 to 89 days past due and interest is still accruing. While these loans are actively worked to bring them current, past due loan trends may be a leading indicator of potential future nonperforming loans and charge-offs.

35


Table of Contents

  Commercial Watchlist — This table illustrates the commercial loans that, while still accruing interest, may be at risk due to general economic conditions or changes in a borrower’s financial status.
  Nonperforming Assets — This table illustrates the loans that are in nonaccrual status, loans past due 90 days or more on which interest is still accruing, nonperforming loans that are held for sale, and other repossessed assets acquired. The commercial loans included in this table are reviewed as part of the watchlist process in addition to the loans displayed in the commercial watchlist table.
  Net Charge-Offs — This table illustrates the portion of loans that have been charged-off during each quarter.
  Analysis of Allowance for Loan Losses — This table illustrates the changes that result in the period-end allowance for loan losses position.
     Delinquency Rates by Loan Portfolio
The following table displays historical delinquency rates by loan portfolio.
Table 1 — Delinquency Rates By Loan Portfolio
                                                                                 
30 to 89 days Past Due   Mar 31, 2009     Dec 31, 2008     Sep 30, 2008     Jun 30, 2008     Mar 31, 2008  
            % of             % of             % of             % of             % of  
(dollars in millions)   $     Portfolio     $     Portfolio     $     Portfolio     $     Portfolio     $     Portfolio  
                     
Land Hold
  $ 3.7       6.83 %   $ 3.9       8.67 %   $ 7.3       15.11 %   $ 9.3       18.67 %     6.6       10.71 %
Land Development
    11.1       9.16       5.2       3.92       10.3       8.24       1.1       0.86       16.3       10.24  
Construction
    16.7       6.48       27.3       10.36       26.1       7.17       11.9       3.46       10.5       2.83  
Income Producing
    64.2       4.12       76.7       4.93       50.1       3.27       48.5       3.09       29.3       1.87  
Owner-Occupied
    37.4       3.92       37.5       3.88       21.3       2.13       18.6       1.84       19.0       1.87  
                     
Total Commercial Real Estate
    133.1       4.52       150.6       5.08       115.1       3.75       89.4       2.88       81.7       2.57  
Commercial and Industrial
    47.1       1.97       56.5       2.17       29.1       1.08       29.5       1.09       39.9       1.50  
                     
Total Commercial Loans
    180.2       3.38       207.1       3.72       144.2       2.50       118.9       2.05       121.6       2.09  
 
Residential Mortgage
    25.9       2.14       39.5       3.13       37.7       2.95       38.5       2.94       33.5       2.40  
Direct Consumer
    20.4       1.45       25.5       1.76       19.5       1.32       18.4       1.22       21.7       1.42  
Indirect Consumer
    14.7       1.83       18.5       2.25       13.6       1.61       14.4       1.73       13.3       1.62  
                     
Total Delinquent Loans
  $ 241.2       2.76 %   $ 290.6       3.19 %   $ 215.0       2.29 %   $ 190.2       2.01 %     190.1       1.99 %
 
                                                                     
Total delinquencies at March 31, 2009 decreased $49.4 million or 17.0% from December 31, 2008 and increased $51.1 million or 26.9% over March 31, 2008. The decrease from December 31, 2008 was primarily the result of delinquent commercial loans returning to current status as well as delinquent loans in all portfolios migrating to nonperforming status more quickly than historically experienced. Total commercial loan delinquencies decreased 13.0% and total consumer loan delinquencies decreased 26.9%. The increase over March 31, 2008 was primarily as a result of the continued weak economy in the Midwest and particularly in Michigan, which continues to significantly impact Citizens’ commercial real estate portfolio and, to a lesser extent, the commercial and industrial portfolio. The consumer loan portfolio has remained relatively consistent. Total commercial loan delinquencies (including commercial real estate as well as commercial and industrial) increased 48.2% while total consumer loan delinquencies decreased 10.9%.
     Commercial Watchlist
As part of the overall credit underwriting and review process, Citizens carefully monitors commercial credits that are current in terms of principal and interest payments but may deteriorate in quality as economic conditions change. Commercial relationship officers monitor their clients’ financial condition and initiate changes in loan ratings based on their findings. Loans that have migrated within the loan rating system to a level that requires increased oversight are considered watchlist loans (generally consistent with the regulatory definition of special mention, substandard, and doubtful loans) and include loans that are in accruing or nonperforming status. Citizens utilizes the watchlist process as a proactive credit risk management practice to help mitigate the migration of commercial loans to nonperforming status and potential loss. Once a loan is placed on the watchlist, it is reviewed quarterly by the chief credit officer, senior credit officers, senior market managers, and commercial relationship officers to assess cash flows, collateral valuations, guarantor liquidity and other pertinent trends. During these meetings, action plans are implemented or reviewed to address emerging problem loans or to remove loans from the portfolio. Additionally, loans viewed as substandard or doubtful are transferred to Citizens’ special loans or small business workout groups and are subjected to an even higher level of monitoring and workout activity.

36


Table of Contents

Table 2 — Commercial Watchlist
                                                                                 
Accruing loans only   Mar 31, 2009     Dec 31, 2008     Sep 30, 2008     Jun 30, 2008     Mar 31, 2008  
            % of             % of             % of             % of             % of  
(dollars in millions)   $     Portfolio     $     Portfolio     $     Portfolio     $     Portfolio     $     Portfolio  
                     
Land Hold
  $ 15.7       28.97 %   $ 18.5       41.11 %   $ 20.7       42.86 %   $ 24.2       48.59 %   $ 27.7       44.97 %
Land Development
    62.4       51.49       49.3       37.15       51.8       41.44       47.5       37.05       55.9       35.11  
Construction
    86.6       33.60       74.8       28.39       104.8       28.78       86.3       25.08       66.7       17.99  
Income Producing
    421.9       27.08       401.0       25.77       290.3       18.93       239.3       15.24       221.3       14.12  
Owner-Occupied
    224.2       23.53       178.4       18.44       167.0       16.71       161.8       16.03       155.8       15.34  
                     
Total Commercial Real Estate
    810.8       27.54       722.0       24.35       634.6       20.67       559.1       18.03       527.4       16.61  
Commercial and Industrial
    479.7       20.03       436.8       16.78       431.2       15.95       432.5       16.00       407.1       15.34  
                     
Total Watchlist Loans
  $ 1,290.5       24.17 %   $ 1,158.8       20.82 %   $ 1,065.8       18.46 %   $ 991.6       17.08 %   $ 934.5       16.03 %
 
                                                                     
Accruing watchlist loans at March 31, 2009 increased $131.7 million or 11.4% over December 31, 2008 and increased $356.0 million or 38.1% over March 31, 2008. The increases were primarily the result of continuing commercial real estate deterioration in Michigan and additional proactive downgrades in commercial and industrial loans as a result of closely monitoring borrowers’ repayment capacity in this environment.
     Nonperforming Assets
Nonperforming assets are comprised of nonaccrual loans, loans past due over 90 days and still accruing interest, restructured loans, nonperforming loans held for sale, and other repossessed assets acquired. Although these assets have more than a normal risk of loss, they may not necessarily result in future losses. The table below provides a summary of nonperforming assets.
Table 3 — Nonperforming Assets
                                                                                 
    Mar 31, 2009     Dec 31, 2008     Sep 30, 2008     Jun 30, 2008     Mar 31, 2008  
            % of             % of             % of             % of             % of  
(dollars in millions)   $     Portfolio     $     Portfolio     $     Portfolio     $     Portfolio     $     Portfolio  
                     
Land Hold
  $ 12.0       22.14 %   $ 10.4       23.11 %   $ 11.0       22.77 %   $ 3.4       6.83 %   $ 5.5       8.93 %
Land Development
    14.6       12.05       23.4       17.63       20.6       16.48       22.8       17.78       46.4       29.15  
Construction
    26.5       10.28       18.3       6.94       25.7       7.06       12.6       3.66       51.9       14.00  
Income Producing
    116.3       7.46       78.6       5.05       57.6       3.76       23.1       1.47       40.5       2.58  
Owner-Occupied
    66.5       6.98       31.8       3.29       17.7       1.77       13.1       1.30       23.5       2.31  
                     
Total Commercial Real Estate
    235.9       8.01       162.5       5.48       132.6       4.32       75.0       2.42       167.8       5.29  
Commercial and Industrial
    83.7       3.50       64.6       2.48       38.2       1.41       31.6       1.17       20.3       0.76  
                     
Total Nonperforming Commercial Loans
    319.6       5.99       227.1       4.08       170.8       2.96       106.6       1.84       188.1       3.23  
 
                                                                               
Residential Mortgage
    84.6       7.00       59.5       4.71       40.2       3.14       12.4       0.95       45.8       3.29  
Direct Consumer
    21.0       1.49       15.1       1.04       16.3       1.10       16.3       1.09       13.5       0.88  
Indirect Consumer
    2.0       0.25       2.6       0.32       2.1       0.25       1.4       0.17       1.7       0.21  
Loans 90+ days still accruing and restructured
    1.4       0.02       1.7       0.02       1.9       0.02       2.5       0.03       4.4       0.05  
                     
Total Nonperforming Portfolio Loans
    428.6       4.90 %     306.0       3.36 %     231.3       2.47 %     139.2       1.47 %     253.5       2.65 %
Nonperforming Held for Sale
    64.6               75.2               86.6               92.6               22.8          
Other Repossessed Assets Acquired
    57.4               58.0               46.5               54.1               50.3          
 
                                                                     
Total Nonperforming Assets
  $ 550.6             $ 439.2             $ 364.4             $ 285.9             $ 326.6          
 
                                                                     
Nonperforming assets increased $111.4 million or 25.4% over December 31, 2008 and increased $224.0 million or 68.6% over March 31, 2008. The increases were primarily the result of continued deterioration in the real estate secured portfolios (particularly commercial) and general economic deterioration in the Midwest. One commercial and industrial loan that became nonperforming during the first quarter of 2009 accounted for $17.3 million of the increases. Nonperforming assets at March 31, 2009 represented 6.25% of total loans plus other repossessed assets acquired compared with 4.79% at December 31, 2008 and 3.39% at March 31, 2008. Nonperforming commercial loan inflows were $173.0 million in the first quarter of 2009 compared with $155.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2008 and $99.0 million in the first quarter of 2008.
Nonperforming commercial loan outflows were $80.4 million in the first quarter of 2009 compared with $99.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2008 and $33.7 million in the first quarter of 2008. The first quarter of 2009 outflows included $32.8 million in loans that returned to accruing status, $16.2 million in loan payoffs and paydowns, $26.2 million in charged-off loans, and $5.2 million transferring to other repossessed assets acquired.

37


Table of Contents

Some of the Citizens’ nonperforming loans included in the nonperforming asset table above are considered to be impaired. A loan is considered impaired when Citizens determines that it is probable that all the contractual principal and interest due under the loan may not be collected. See Note 4 to the unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements in this report for information on impaired loans.
     Net Charge-Offs, Provision for Loan Losses, and Allowance for Loan Losses
A summary of net charge-off experience in each of the five most recent fiscal quarters is provided below.
Table 4 — Net Charge-Offs
                                                                                 
    Three Months Ended  
    Mar 31, 2009     Dec 31, 2008     Sep 30, 2008     Jun 30, 2008     Mar 31, 2008  
            % of             % of             % of             % of             % of  
(dollars in millions)   $     Portfolio**     $     Portfolio**     $     Portfolio**     $     Portfolio**     $     Portfolio**  
                     
Land Hold
  $       %   $ 4.6       40.89 %   $ 1.7       14.08 %   $ 0.7       5.62 %   $ 0.5       3.25 %
Land Development
    6.3       20.79       5.8       17.48       6.9       22.08       16.4       51.17       6.6       16.58  
Construction
    2.0       3.10       10.7       16.24       0.5       0.55       13.8       16.04       1.2       1.29  
Income Producing
    7.8       2.00       21.7       5.58       4.4       1.15       7.7       1.96       0.9       0.23  
Owner-Occupied
    2.4       1.01       3.1       1.28       1.3       0.52       3.4       1.35       (0.1 )     (0.04 )
                     
Total Commercial Real Estate
    18.5       2.51       45.9       6.19       14.8       1.93       42.0       5.42       9.1       1.15  
Commercial and Industrial
    8.0       1.34       21.9       3.37       0.4       0.06       0.6       0.09       0.9       0.14  
                     
Total Commercial Loans
    26.5       1.99       67.8       4.87       15.2       1.05       42.6       2.94       10.0       0.69  
 
                                                                               
Residential Mortgage
    0.8       0.26       1.6       0.51       0.5       0.16       20.7       6.33       1.8       0.52  
Direct Consumer
    4.4       1.25       5.9       1.63       3.3       0.89       3.1       0.83       3.0       0.79  
Indirect Consumer
    5.0       2.49       5.7       2.78       3.4       1.61       2.9       1.39       2.6       1.27  
                     
Total Net Charge-offs
  $ 36.7       1.67 %   $ 81.0       3.48 %   $ 22.4       0.94 %   $ 69.3       2.93 %   $ 17.4       0.74 %
 
                                                                     
 
**   Represents an annualized rate.
The increase in net charge-offs for the first quarter of 2009 over the first quarter of 2008 was primarily the result of higher charge-offs on nonperforming commercial real estate loans due to declining real estate values and general economic deterioration in the Midwest.
After determining what Citizens believes is an adequate allowance for loan losses based on the risk in the portfolio, the provision for loan losses is calculated as a result of the net effect of the quarterly change in the allowance for loan losses and the quarterly net charge-offs. The provision for loan losses was $64.0 million in the first quarter of 2009, compared with $30.6 million in the first quarter of 2008. The increase was primarily the result of higher net charge-offs and the continued migration of loans to nonperforming status. This migration, and evaluation of the underlying collateral supporting these loans, caused an increase in the allowance for loan losses due to the higher likelihood that portions of these loans may eventually be charged-off.
A summary of loan loss experience during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 is provided below.
Analysis of Allowance for Loan Losses
                 
    Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
(dollars in thousands)   2009     2008  
 
Allowance for loan losses — beginning of period
  $ 255,321     $ 163,353  
Provision for loan losses
    64,017       30,619  
Charge-offs
    38,103       18,609  
Recoveries
    1,412       1,165  
 
           
Net charge-offs
    36,691       17,444  
 
           
Allowance for loan losses — end of period
  $ 282,647     $ 176,528  
 
           
 
               
Portfolio loans outstanding at period end (1)
  $ 8,754,449     $ 9,572,790  
Average portfolio loans outstanding during period (1)
    8,908,018       9,499,209  
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of portfolio loans
    3.23 %     1.84 %
Ratio of net charge-offs during period to average portfolio loans (annualized)
    1.67       0.74  
 
 
(1)   Balances exclude mortgage loans held for sale.

38


Table of Contents

The allowance for loan losses was $282.6 million or 3.23% of portfolio loans at March 31, 2009, compared with $255.3 million or 2.80% at December 31, 2008 and $176.5 million or 1.84% at March 31, 2008. The increases were primarily the result of continued deterioration in commercial real estate loans, signs of potential deterioration in commercial and industrial loans due to recessionary pressures, and an increase in the loss migration rates and extended duration of residential mortgage and consumer loans.
Citizens’ methodology for measuring the adequacy of the allowance includes several key elements, which include specific allocated allowances for identified problem loans, a risk allocated allowance that is comprised of several homogeneous loan pool valuation allowances based on historical data with additional qualitative risk determined by the judgment of management, and a general valuation allowance that reflects Citizens’ evaluation of a number of other risk factors. The specific allocated allowance is determined in accordance with SFAS 114 based on probable losses on specific nonperforming commercial loans after reviewing the loans for underlying cash flow and collateral value, as well as incorporating the effects of previous charge-offs. The specific allocated allowance totaled $46.6 million at March 31, 2009, compared with $39.9 million at December 31, 2008 and $17.4 million at March 31, 2008. This represents 17.1%, 20.9%, and 25.3% of the underlying nonperforming loans at each period end, respectively. The risk allocated and general valuation allowances are comprised of several loan pool valuation allowances determined in accordance with SFAS 5 based on Citizens’ quantitative loan loss experience for similar loans with similar risk characteristics as well as other factors based on the best judgment of management. The risk allocated and general valuation allowances totaled $236.0 million at March 31, 2009, compared with $215.4 million at December 31, 2008 and $159.1 million at March 31, 2008. This represents 150.4%, 187.1%, and 86.2% of the underlying nonperforming loans at each period end, respectively. The loans used in the calculation of the risk allocated and general valuation allowances exclude the loans subject to the specific allocated allowance. Based on current conditions and expectations, Citizens believes that the allowance for loan losses is adequate to address the estimated loan losses inherent in the existing loan portfolio at March 31, 2009. Additional information regarding Citizens’ methodology is discussed in “Item 7 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Citizens’ 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
     Effects of Chrysler LLC Bankruptcy Filing
On April 30, 2009 Chrysler LLC (“Chrysler”) filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection and announced that most of its manufacturing operations will be temporarily idled until the bankruptcy process is complete. While Citizens had no direct exposure to Chrysler at March 31, 2009, Citizens had approximately $45 million in commercial loan exposure to Chrysler’s tier one and tier two suppliers and dealerships. When making this determination, Citizens included manufacturers, tier one and tier two suppliers, and dealerships with at least 25% of their revenue dependent on Chrysler. Citizens believes that some of its markets may see an increase in unemployment rates because these entities make up a significant portion of the local labor force. If this occurs, Citizens may experience higher default rates on its residential mortgage and consumer loan portfolios and may experience a reduction in deposit balances. However, Citizens can not reasonably predict the magnitude of the potential impact on its’ operations at this time.
Citizens will continue to closely monitor the circumstances surrounding Chrysler LLC, the other U.S. based automotive manufacturers, their major suppliers and dealerships as well as their restructuring plans. Citizens has determined that the commercial loan exposure for this industry is less than ten percent of the total loan exposure for the Corporation and believes that the risk associated with this industry has been appropriately considered in the allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2009.
Loans Held for Sale
Loans held for sale at March 31, 2009 were essentially unchanged from December 31, 2008 at $89.8 million and increased $8.3 million or 10.2% over March 31, 2008. The increase over March 31, 2008 was primarily the result of transferring $92.8 million in nonperforming commercial real estate and residential mortgage loans to loans held for sale during the second quarter of 2008, partially offset by a decrease in residential mortgage origination volume awaiting sale in the secondary market as a result of faster funding through Citizens’ alliance with PHH Mortgage, which began at the end of the first quarter of 2008 and, to a lesser extent, a decline in commercial loans held for sale due to customer paydowns, adjustments to reflect current fair-market value, and transfers to ORE.

39


Table of Contents

Goodwill
Goodwill at March 31, 2009 was $597.2 million, unchanged from December 31, 2008 and a decrease of $178.1 million or 23.0% from March 31, 2008. The decrease was due to a $178.1 million non-cash and non-tax-deductible goodwill impairment charge recorded in the second quarter of 2008. Citizens performed an evaluation to determine if events or circumstances indicated additional goodwill impairment at March 31, 2009. As the key inputs and drivers remained consistent with those used as of the annual impairment testing date, Citizens concluded that no additional impairment was indicated. There can be no assurance, however, that future testing will not result in additional material impairment charges due to further developments in the banking industry or Citizens’ markets.
Deposits
Total deposits at March 31, 2009 were $9.1 billion, up slightly from December 31, 2008 and an increase of $632.5 million or 7.5% over March 31, 2008. Core deposits, which exclude all time deposits, totaled $4.7 billion at March 31, 2009, an increase of $295.5 million or 6.7% over December 31, 2008 and an increase of $266.1 million or 6.0% over March 31, 2008. The increases were primarily the result of clients holding higher balances in transaction accounts and recent changes in FDIC coverage thresholds. Time deposits totaled $4.4 billion at March 31, 2009, a decrease of $228.4 million or 4.9% from December 31, 2008 and an increase of $366.4 million or 9.1% over March 31, 2008. The decrease in time deposits from December 31, 2008 was primarily the result of a $122.6 million reduction in brokered deposits and a strategic shift in funding mix from customer time deposits to core deposits. The increase over March 31, 2008 was primarily the result of a shift in funding mix from short-term borrowings to longer-term retail certificates of deposit due to deposit generation campaigns, partially offset by the aforementioned decrease during the first quarter of 2009.
Citizens gathers deposits from the local markets of its banking subsidiaries and has used brokered deposits from time to time when cost effective. Citizens had approximately $1.2 billion in time deposits of $100,000 or more at March 31, 2009, compared with $1.4 billion at December 31, 2008 and $1.5 billion at March 31, 2008. At March 31, 2009, Citizens had $933.8 million in brokered deposits, compared with $1.1 billion at December 31, 2008 and $574.7 million at March 31, 2008. Citizens continues to promote relationship-driven core deposit growth and stability through focused marketing efforts and competitive pricing strategies.
Borrowed Funds
Short-term borrowings are comprised of federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and other short-term borrowings which consists of treasury tax and loans. Short-term borrowed funds at March 31, 2009 totaled $66.9 million, a decrease of $8.5 million from December 31, 2008 and a decrease of $473.4 million from March 31, 2008. The decrease from December 31, 2008 was primarily the result of lower short-term repurchase agreement balances, partially offset by an increase in treasury, tax, and loan borrowings. The decrease from March 31, 2008 was primarily the result of a strategic shift in funding mix toward deposits and the use of proceeds from the June 2008 capital offering to pay down short-term borrowings.
Long-term debt consists of advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) to our subsidiary banks, debt issued by the Holding Company, and other borrowed funds. Long-term debt at March 31, 2009 totaled $2.1 billion, a decrease of $128.0 million or 5.8% from December 31, 2008 and a decrease of $734.2 million or 26.2% from March 31, 2008. The decreases were primarily the result of a shift in the mix of funding to deposits to retire maturing advances and repurchase agreements. Borrowed funds are expected to remain an important, reliable and cost-effective funding vehicle.
Capital Resources
Citizens continues to maintain a strong capital position, and its regulatory capital ratios are above “well-capitalized” standards. The Corporation’s capital ratios as of March 31, 2009, December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2008 are presented below.

40


Table of Contents

Capital Ratios
                                         
    Regulatory Minimum            
            “Well-   March 31,   December 31,   March 31,
    Required   Capitalized”   2009   2008   2008
 
Risk based:
                                       
Tier 1 capital
    4.00 %     6.00 %     12.16 %     12.21 %     9.04 %
Total capital
    8.00       10.00       14.21       14.49       11.26  
 
                                       
Tier 1 leverage
    4.00       5.00       9.32       9.66       7.40  
 
Shareholders’ equity at March 31, 2009 was $1.6 billion, essentially unchanged from December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2008. Book value per common share at March 31, 2009, December 31, 2008, and March 31, 2008 was $10.29, $10.60, and $20.82, respectively. When compared with March 31, 2008, the increases in shareholders’ equity due to the $489.0 million in capital acquired during the second and fourth quarters of 2008 were substantially offset by the effects of the net losses incurred during 2008 and the first quarter of 2009.
During the first quarter of 2009, the Holding Company did not purchase any shares of common stock as part of the Corporation’s share repurchase program approved by the Board of Directors in October 2003. Information regarding the Corporation’s share repurchase program is set forth later in this report under Part II, Item 2 “Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.”
Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Contractual obligations and off-balance sheet arrangements are described in “Item 7 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” contained in the Corporation’s 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K. There have been no material changes to those obligations or arrangements outside the ordinary course of business since the most recent fiscal year end.
Liquidity and Liquidity Risk Management
Citizens monitors and manages its liquidity position so that funds will be available at a reasonable cost to meet financial commitments, to finance business expansion and to take advantage of unforeseen opportunities. Liquidity management involves projecting funding requirements and maintaining sufficient capacity to meet those needs and accommodate fluctuations in asset and liability levels due to changes in business operations or unanticipated events. Sources of liquidity include deposits and other customer-based funding, and wholesale market funding.
Citizens manages liquidity at two levels. The first level is at the Holding Company, which owns the banking subsidiaries. The second level is at the banking subsidiaries. The management of liquidity at both levels is essential because the Holding Company and banking subsidiaries have different funding needs and sources, and are subject to certain regulatory guidelines and requirements. The Asset Liability Committee is responsible for establishing a liquidity policy, approving operating and contingency procedures and monitoring liquidity on an ongoing basis. In order to maintain adequate liquidity through a wide range of potential operating environments and market conditions, Citizens conducts liquidity management and business activities in a manner designed to preserve and enhance funding stability, flexibility and diversity of funding sources. Key components of this operating strategy include a strong focus on customer-based funding, maximizing secured borrowing capacity, maintaining relationships with wholesale market funding providers, and maintaining the ability to liquidate certain assets if conditions warrant.
Credit ratings by the nationally recognized statistical rating agencies are an important component of Citizens’ liquidity profile. Credit ratings relate to the Corporation’s ability to issue debt securities and the cost to borrow money, and should not be viewed as an indication of future stock performance or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold securities. Among other factors, the credit ratings are based on financial strength, credit quality and concentrations in the loan portfolio, the level and volatility of earnings, capital adequacy, the quality of management, the liquidity of the balance sheet, the availability of a significant base of core deposits, and Citizens’ ability to access a broad array of wholesale funding sources. Adverse changes in these factors could result in a negative change in credit ratings and impact not only the ability to raise funds in the capital markets, but also the cost of these funds. Citizens’ credit rating was reviewed by Moody’s Investor Service in October 2008 and maintained, and was downgraded by Standard and Poor’s in October 2008, Dominion Bond Rating Service in April 2009, and Fitch Ratings in February 2008. Ratings are subject to revision or withdrawal at any time and each rating should be evaluated independently. The current credit ratings for the Holding Company and its subsidiary banks are displayed in the following table.

41


Table of Contents

Credit Ratings
                                 
                            Dominion
            Moody’s           Bond
    Standard   Investor   Fitch   Rating
    & Poor’s   Service   Ratings   Service
Citizens Republic Bancorp (Holding Company)
                               
Long-Term Debt
  BBB-     A3     BBB-   BBB (low)
Short-Term Debt
    A-3     P -2       F3     R-2 (low)
Trust Preferred
  BB   Baa1   BB+   BB (high)
 
                               
Citizens Bank
                               
Certificate of Deposit
          A2     BBB   BBB
 
                               
F&M Bank-Iowa
                               
Certificate of Deposit
              BBB   BBB
The primary sources of liquidity for the Holding Company are dividends from and returns on investment in its subsidiaries and existing cash resources. Banking regulations limit the amount of dividends a financial institution may declare to a parent company in any calendar year. Each of the banking subsidiaries is subject to dividend limits under the laws of the state in which it is chartered and to the banking regulations mentioned above. Federal and national chartered financial institutions are allowed to make dividends or other capital distributions in an amount not exceeding the current calendar year’s net income, plus retained net income of the preceding two years. Distributions in excess of this limit require prior regulatory approval. Throughout the first quarter of 2009, the Holding Company chose not to receive dividends from subsidiaries and paid no dividends to its common shareholders. In April 2008, the Holding Company’s board voted to suspend the common stock quarterly cash dividend as a means of bolstering the Holding Company’s capital position and strengthening its balance sheet. Citizens elected not to receive any dividends from its subsidiaries but as of April 1, 2009 the subsidiary banks had the capacity to pay dividends of $2.8 million to the Holding Company without prior regulatory approval. The ability to borrow funds on both a short-term and long-term basis and to sell equity securities provides an additional source of liquidity for the Holding Company.
As of March 31, 2009, the Holding Company’s cash resources totaled $220.1 million. The Holding Company’s interest and preferred dividend payment obligations are approximately $35 million annually. Citizens monitors the relationship between cash obligations and available cash resources, and believes that the Holding Company has sufficient liquidity to meet its currently anticipated short and long-term needs.
The primary source of liquidity for the banking subsidiaries is customer deposits raised through the branch offices. Additional sources are wholesale borrowing, unencumbered or unpledged investment securities, and access to secured borrowing at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis, and the Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines. Overall liquidity improved due to an increase in deposits and a decrease in loan demand.
Citizens maintains a very strong liquidity position due to its on-balance sheet liquidity sources and very stable funding base comprised of approximately 70% deposits, 16% long-term debt, 12% equity, and 2% short-term liabilities. Citizens also has access to high levels of untapped liquidity through collateral-based borrowing capacity provided by portions of both the loan and investment securities portfolios. Additionally, money market investments and securities available-for-sale could be sold for cash to provide liquidity.
The Corporation’s long-term debt to equity ratio was 131.7% as of March 31, 2009 compared with 136.9% at December 31, 2008. Changes in deposit obligations and short-term and long-term debt during the first quarter of 2009 are further discussed in the sections titled “Deposits” and “Borrowed Funds.” The Corporation believes that it has sufficient liquidity to meet presently known short and long-term cash-flow requirements arising from ongoing business transactions.

42


Table of Contents

Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk refers to the risk of loss arising from changes in market interest rates. The risk of loss can be assessed by examining the potential for adverse changes in fair values, cash flows, and future earnings resulting from changes in market interest rates. Interest rate risk on Citizens’ balance sheet consists of reprice, option, and basis risks. Reprice risk results from differences in the maturity or repricing timing of asset and liability portfolios. Option risk arises from embedded options present in many financial instruments such as loan prepayment options, deposit early withdrawal options, and interest rate options. These options allow certain of Citizens’ customers and counterparties to the investment and wholesale funding portfolios the opportunity to benefit when market interest rates change, which typically results in higher costs or lower revenues for the Corporation. Basis risk results when assets and liabilities reprice at the same time but based on different market rates or indices, which can change by different amounts, resulting in a narrowing of profit spread.
The asset/liability management process seeks to insulate net interest income from large fluctuations attributable to changes in market interest rates and to maximize net interest income within acceptable levels of risk through periods of changing interest rates. Accordingly, the Corporation’s interest rate sensitivity is monitored on an ongoing basis by its Asset Liability Committee, which oversees interest rate risk management and establishes risk measures, limits, and policy guidelines. A combination of complementary techniques is used to measure interest rate risk exposure, the distribution of risk, the level of risk over time, and the exposure to changes in certain interest rate relationships. These measures include static repricing gap analysis, simulation of earnings, and estimates of economic value of equity.
Static repricing gap analysis provides a measurement of reprice risk on the Corporation’s balance sheet as of a point in time. This measurement is accomplished through stratification of the Corporation’s rate sensitive assets and liabilities into repricing periods. The sums of assets and liabilities maturing or repricing in each of these periods are compared for mismatches within each time segment. Core deposits lacking contractual maturities or repricing frequencies are placed into repricing and maturity periods based upon historical experience. Repricing periods for assets include the effects of expected prepayments on cash flows.
Rate sensitive assets repricing within one year exceeded rate sensitive liabilities repricing within one year by $221.4 million or 1.7% of total assets as of March 31, 2009 compared with $215.6 million or 1.6% of total assets at December 31, 2008. These results incorporate the impact of off-balance sheet derivatives and reflect interest rates consistent with March 31, 2009 levels. Repricing gap analysis is limited in its ability to measure interest rate sensitivity, as embedded options can change the repricing characteristics of assets, liabilities, and off-balance sheet derivatives in different interest rate scenarios, thereby changing the repricing position from that outlined above. Further, basis risk is not captured by repricing gap analysis.
Citizens utilizes a net interest income simulation model as the primary quantitative tool in measuring the amount of interest rate risk associated with changing market rates. The model measures the impact of net interest income relative to a base case scenario of hypothetical fluctuations in interest rates over the next 12 months. These simulations incorporate assumptions including prepayment speeds on various loan and investment assets, cash flows and maturities of financial instruments, market conditions, balance sheet growth and mix, pricing, client preferences, and Citizens’ financial capital plans. These assumptions are inherently uncertain and subject to fluctuation and revision in a dynamic environment and as a result the model cannot perfectly forecast net interest income nor exactly predict the impact of higher or lower interest rates on net interest income. Actual results will differ from simulated results due to the timing, magnitude, and frequency of balance sheet component and interest rate changes, and differences in client behavior, market conditions and management strategies, among other factors.
Net interest income simulations were performed as of March 31, 2009 to evaluate the impact of market rate changes on net interest income over the subsequent 12 months assuming expected changes in balance sheet composition over that time period. If market interest rates were to increase immediately by 100 or 200 basis points (a parallel and immediate shift of the yield curve) net interest income would be expected to increase by 0.8% and 1.6%, respectively, from what it would be if rates were to remain at March 31, 2009 levels. Net interest income simulation for 100 and 200 basis point parallel declines in market rates were not performed at March 31, 2009, as the results would not have been meaningful given the current level of short-term market interest rates. These measurements are consistent with those at December 31, 2008. Net interest income is not only affected by the level and direction of interest rate changes, but also by the shape of the yield curve, pricing spreads in

43


Table of Contents

relation to market rates, balance sheet growth, the mix of different types of assets and liabilities, and the timing of changes in these variables. Scenarios different from those outlined above, whether different by timing, level, or a combination of factors, could produce different results.
From time-to-time, derivative contracts are used to help manage or hedge exposure to interest rate risk and market value risk. Citizens enters into derivative financial instruments to manage exposures that arise from business activities that result in the receipt or payment of future known and uncertain cash amounts, the value of which are determined by interest rates. Citizens’ derivative financial instruments are used to manage differences in the amount, timing, and duration of its known or expected cash receipts and expected cash payments principally related to certain variable-rate loan assets and fixed-rate borrowings. Citizens has agreements with its derivative counterparties that contain a provision where if Citizens defaults on any of its indebtedness, including a default where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, then it could also be declared in default on its derivative obligations. Citizens also has agreements with certain of its derivative counterparties that contain a provision where if it fails to maintain its status as a well/ adequate capitalized institution, then the counterparty could terminate the derivative positions and Citizens would be required to settle its obligations under the agreements. Citizens has agreements with its derivative counterparties containing provisions that require its debt to maintain an investment grade credit rating from each of the major credit rating agencies. If Citizens’ credit rating is reduced below investment grade then a termination event shall have deemed to occur and the counterparty shall have the right to terminate all affected transactions under the agreement. If Citizens had breached any of these provisions at March 31, 2009, it would have been required to settle its obligations under the agreements at the termination value and would have been required to pay any additional amounts due in excess of amounts previously posted as collateral with the respective counterparty. Such additional amounts totaled $7.2 million at March 31, 2009. Further discussion of derivative instruments is included in Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
There has been no material change in the information concerning quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk contained in Item 7A of Citizens’ 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K, except as set forth in “Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Interest Rate Risk” of this Form 10-Q.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective disclosure controls and procedures, as defined under Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that are designed to cause the material information required to be disclosed by Citizens in the reports it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to be recorded, processed, summarized, and reported to the extent applicable within the time periods required by the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that a control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, with a company have been detected.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, Citizens performed an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

44


Table of Contents

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
No changes were made to the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) during the last fiscal quarter that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. Risk Factors
For information regarding risk factors affecting Citizens, see “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part I of Citizens’ 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K. These risk factors are not the only risks Citizens face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known or that Citizens currently deems to be immaterial also may materially adversely impact Citizens’ business, financial condition, or results of operations.
Citizens has identified the following additional risk factor that could materially affect its future operating results.
If the FDIC raises the assessment rate charged to its insured financial institutions, our FDIC insurance premium may increase and this could have a negative effect on our expenses and results of operations.
During 2008 and continuing in 2009, higher levels of bank failures have dramatically increased resolution costs for the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and depleted its deposit insurance fund. In addition, the FDIC instituted two temporary programs effective through December 31, 2009 to further insure customer deposits at FDIC-member banks: deposit accounts are now insured up to $250,000 per customer (up from $100,000) and certain noninterest bearing transactional accounts are fully insured (unlimited coverage). These programs have placed additional stress on the deposit insurance fund.
In order to maintain a strong funding position and restore reserve ratios for the deposit insurance fund, the FDIC increased assessment rates for all insured institutions by 7 cents for every $100 of deposits, beginning with the first quarter of 2009. Beginning April 1, 2009, additional rule changes will require institutions to pay their premiums using a risk-weighted factor which is expected to increase future FDIC insurance premiums.
On February 27, 2009, the FDIC voted to amend the restoration plan and impose a special assessment of 20 cents for every $100 of deposits at June 30, 2009, which would be payable on September 30, 2009. The interim rule also permits the FDIC to impose an additional emergency special assessment after June 30, 2009, of up to 10 cents per $100 of deposits, if necessary. These interim rules were subject to a 30-day comment period. As of the filing date of this Form 10-Q, the FDIC has not issued its final rules regarding the special assessments.
If there are additional financial institution failures, we may be required to pay even higher FDIC insurance premiums than the recently increased levels. These announced increases and any future increase in FDIC insurance premiums may materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

45


Table of Contents

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
                                 
                    Total Number of    
                    Shares Purchased as   Maximum Number of
                    Part of Publicly   Shares That May Yet
    Total Number of   Average Price Paid   Announced Plans or   Be Purchased Under
Period   Shares Purchased   Per Share   Programs   The Plans or Programs
January 2009
    1,295 (a)     3.14             1,241,154  
February 2009
    9,364 (a)     1.35             1,241,154  
March 2009
                      1,241,154  
 
                               
Total
    10,659       1.56             1,241,154  
 
(a)   Shares repurchased in connection with taxes due from employees as a result of the vesting of certain restricted share awards in accordance with the related grant agreements. These repurchases were not part of the repurchase program approved in October 2003.
In October 2003, the Board of Directors approved the repurchase of 3,000,000 shares of common stock from time to time in the market. There is no expiration date for the repurchase program. The repurchase of shares is generally prohibited, with certain exceptions, by Citizens’ Agreement with the U.S. Treasury pursuant to which the Treasury purchased Citizens’ preferred stock under the CPP as long as Treasury continues to hold the preferred shares, and is also subject to limitations that may be imposed by applicable securities laws and regulations and the rules of the NASDAQ Global Select Market®. The timing of the purchases and the number of shares to be bought at any one time depend on market conditions and Citizens’ capital requirements. There can be no assurance that Citizens will repurchase the remaining shares authorized to be repurchased.
Item 6. Exhibits
     
10.50
  Letter Agreement, dated January 22, 2009, between Citizens Republic Bancorp, Inc. and Cathleen H. Nash (Citizens’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 23, 2009)
 
   
10.51
  Agreement between Citizens Republic Bancorp, Inc. and William R. Hartman, dated January 22, 2009 (Citizens’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 23, 2009)
 
   
10.52
  Form of Long Term Incentive Award Agreement, dated January 29, 2009
 
   
10.53
  Amendment to the Citizens Banking Corporation Stock Compensation Plan, dated February 21, 2007
 
   
31.1
  Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
   
31.2
  Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
   
32.1
  Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

46


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
CITIZENS REPUBLIC BANCORP, INC.
         
     
Date: May 8, 2009  By   /s/ Charles D. Christy    
    Charles D. Christy   
    Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer and duly authorized officer) 
 

47


Table of Contents

         
10-Q EXHIBIT INDEX
     
Exhibit No.   Description
10.50
  Letter Agreement, dated January 22, 2009, between Citizens Republic Bancorp, Inc. and Cathleen H. Nash (Citizens’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 23, 2009)
 
   
10.51
  Agreement between Citizens Republic Bancorp, Inc. and William R. Hartman, dated January 22, 2009 (Citizens’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 23, 2009)
 
   
10.52
  Form of Long Term Incentive Award Agreement, dated January 29, 2009
 
   
10.53
  Amendment to the Citizens Banking Corporation Stock Compensation Plan, dated February 21, 2007
 
   
31.1
  Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
   
31.2
  Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
   
32.1
  Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

48