form10-q.htm

10-Q 1 form10-q.htm FPIC INSURANCE GROUP, INC. FORM 10-Q 2Q2010 form10-q.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

þ	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
	Or
¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the transition period from ___________to ___________

Commission file number: 1-11983

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Florida		59-3359111
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)

1000 Riverside Avenue, Suite 800

Jacksonville, Florida 32204

(904) 354-2482

www.fpic.com

●	Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨

●	Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨

●	Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Large Accelerated Filer ¨ Accelerated Filer þ Non-accelerated Filer ¨

●	Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No þ

●	As of July 30, 2010, there were 9,478,541 shares of the Registrant’s common stock, $.10 par value, outstanding.

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Table of Contents to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2010


Part I		Page
Item 1.	Financial Statements (unaudited)	3
Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	35
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	48
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	50

Part II
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	50
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	51
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	51
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	52
Item 4.	[Removed and Reserved]	52
Item 5.	Other Information	52
Item 6.	Exhibits	53
Signatures		53

Part I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

Financial Statements (unaudited)

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Financial Position (unaudited)

(in thousands, except shares authorized, issued and outstanding)	June 30, 2010		December 31, 2009
Assets
Investments:
Fixed income securities, available-for-sale, at fair value	$	646,998	662,688
Equity securities, available-for-sale, at fair value		10,105	11,212
Short-term investments		654	2,955
Real estate investments		4,895	4,889
Other invested assets		4,233	4,443
Total investments (Note 4)		666,885	686,187

Cash and cash equivalents		68,628	58,626
Premiums receivable (net of an allowance of $300 as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009)		53,944	56,504
Accrued investment income		7,248	7,948
Reinsurance recoverable on paid losses		4,193	4,494
Due from reinsurers on unpaid losses and advance premiums		129,573	133,445
Ceded unearned premiums		10,612	11,245
Deferred policy acquisition costs		9,576	9,918
Deferred income taxes		21,959	26,321
Goodwill and intangible assets		27,741	28,200
Other assets		5,724	8,595
Total assets	$	1,006,083	1,031,483

Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Policy liabilities and accruals:
Losses and loss adjustment expenses	$	532,092	559,257
Unearned premiums		99,279	103,831
Reinsurance payable		977	2,985
Paid in advance and unprocessed premiums		6,777	10,222
Total policy liabilities and accruals		639,125	676,295

Long-term debt		46,083	46,083
Other liabilities		37,208	29,318
Total liabilities		722,416	751,696

Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)

Preferred stock, $0.10 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized; none issued		—	—
Common stock, $0.10 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized; 9,598,921 and 10,142,613 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (1), respectively		960	1,014
Additional paid-in capital		—	—
Retained earnings		268,668	270,118
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net		14,039	8,655
Total shareholders' equity		283,667	279,787
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	1,006,083	1,031,483


(1)	The number of common shares outstanding as of December 31, 2009 has been restated to reflect a three-for-two stock split in March 2010. For additional information, see Note 1, Basis of Presentation and New Accounting Pronouncements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

Form 10-Q: 3

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Income (unaudited)

(in thousands, except basic and diluted earnings per common share)	For the three months ended June 30,				For the six months ended June 30,
	2010		2009		2010			2009
Revenues
Net premiums earned	$	41,843		37,668	$	83,779			76,080
Net investment income		6,253		7,122		12,840			14,341
Net realized investment gains		830		1,025		1,180			967
Other income		409		84		530			180
Total revenues		49,335		45,899		98,329			91,568

Expenses
Net losses and loss adjustment expenses		25,092		21,740		50,519			44,980
Other underwriting expenses		12,218		9,865		23,942			18,929
Interest expense on debt		901		903		1,792			1,798
Other expenses		103		130		306			172
Total expenses		38,314		32,638		76,559			65,879

Income before taxes		11,021		13,261		21,770			25,689
Less: Income tax expense		3,530		4,070		7,064			8,110
Net income	$	7,491		9,191	$	14,706			17,579

Basic earnings per common share (1)	$	0.77		0.83	$	1.49			1.56
Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding (1)		9,710		11,100		9,842			11,291

Diluted earnings per common share (1)	$	0.76		0.81	$	1.46			1.53
Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding (1)		9,902		11,300		10,041			11,520

Net realized investment gains:
Net realized investment gains before credit related impairments	$	830		1,025	$	1,443			2,322
Total other-than-temporary impairments on investments		—		—		(766	)		(1,355	)
Portion of other-than-temporary impairments recognized in other comprehensive income		—		—		503			—
Credit related impairments included in net realized investment gains		—		—		(263	)		(1,355	)
Net realized investment gains	$	830		1,025	$	1,180			967


(1)	Earnings per common share and weighted-average common shares outstanding for the three months and six months ending June 30, 2009 have been restated to reflect the three-for-two stock split in March 2010. For additional information, see Note 1, Basis of Presentation and New Accounting Pronouncements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

Form 10-Q: 4

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity (unaudited)

				(in thousands)
	Shares of Common Stock (1)			Common Stock			Additional Paid-in-Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net			Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Total
Balances at December 31, 2009		10,142,613		$	1,014			—			270,118			8,655					$	279,787

Net income		—			—			—			14,706			—		$	14,706			14,706
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Net unrealized gain on invested assets, net of tax		—			—			—			—			6,148			6,148			6,148
Net unrealized loss on investments with other-than-temporary impairments, net of tax		—			—			—			—			(309	)		(309	)		(309	)
Unrealized loss on derivative financial instruments, net of tax		—			—			—			—			(518	)		(518	)		(518	)
Net gain on pension plan, net of tax		—			—			—			—			63			63			63
Other comprehensive income																	5,384
Comprehensive income																$	20,090

Issuance of restricted stock		87,781			9			1,243			—			—						1,252
Issuance of common shares		77,250			8			869			—			—						877
Repurchase of common shares		(708,723	)		(71	)		(2,536	)		(16,156	)		—						(18,763	)
Share-based compensation		—			—			17			—			—						17
Income tax reductions relating to exercise of stock options		—			—			407			—			—						407
Balances at June 30, 2010		9,598,921		$	960			—			268,668			14,039					$	283,667


(1)	Shares of common stock have been restated to reflect the three-for-two stock split in March 2010. For additional information, see Note 1, Basis of Presentation and New Accounting Pronouncements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

Form 10-Q: 5

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity (unaudited), continued

				(in thousands)
	Shares of Common Stock (1)				Common Stock			Additional Paid-in-Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net			Comprehensive Income (Loss)		Total
Balances at December 31, 2008		11,704,947			$	1,170			—			271,113			(12,389	)			$	259,894

Net income		—				—			—			17,579			—		$	17,579		17,579
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Unrealized gain on invested assets, net of tax		—				—			—			—			9,575			9,575		9,575
Unrealized gain on derivative financial instruments, net of tax		—				—			—			—			697			697		697
Prior service cost		—				—			—			—			1			1		1
Net gain on pension plan, net of tax		—				—			—			—			147			147		147
Other comprehensive income																		10,420
Comprehensive income																	$	27,999

Issuance of restricted stock		40,568				4			1,277			—			—					1,281
Issuance of common shares		117,758				12			858			—			—					870
Repurchase of common shares		(1,033,634	)			(103	)		(3,210	)		(20,368	)		—					(23,681	)
Share-based compensation		—				—			331			—			—					331
Income tax reductions relating to exercise of stock options		—				—			744			—			—					744
Balances at June 30, 2009		10,829,639			$	1,083			—			268,324			(1,969	)			$	267,438


(1)	Shares of common stock have been restated to reflect the three-for-two stock split in March 2010. For additional information, see Note 1, Basis of Presentation and New Accounting Pronouncements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

Form 10-Q: 6

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)

(in thousands)	For the six months ended June 30,
	2010			2009
Operating Activities
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities	$	(7,950	)		6,055

Investing Activities
Proceeds from
Sales of fixed income securities, available-for-sale		78,529			73,782
Sales of equity securities, available-for-sale		499			393
Sales of other invested assets		393			178
Maturities of fixed income securities, available-for-sale		34,353			26,505
Maturities of short-term investments		2,275			—
Purchases of
Fixed income securities, available-for-sale		(80,204	)		(75,215	)
Equity securities, available-for-sale		—			(223	)
Other invested assets		(380	)		(2,266	)
Property and equipment		(100	)		(39	)
Net cash provided by investing activities		35,365			23,115

Financing Activities
Issuance of common stock		877			870
Repurchase of common stock		(18,763	)		(23,681	)
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation		473			744
Net cash used in financing activities		(17,413	)		(22,067	)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		10,002			7,103
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		58,626			58,480
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	68,628			65,583

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Interest paid on debt	$	1,798			1,810
Federal income taxes paid	$	2,100			8,800

Supplemental disclosure of non cash investing and financing activities:
Issuance of restricted stock	$	2,954			1,331
Share-based compensation	$	1,268			1,612

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

Form 10-Q: 7

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

1.	Basis of Presentation and New Accounting Pronouncements

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements represent the consolidation of FPIC Insurance Group, Inc. (“FPIC”) and all majority owned and controlled subsidiaries. Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms “we,” “our,” “us,” the “Company” and “FPIC” as used in this report refer to FPIC Insurance Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries.

These statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The statement of financial position as of December 31, 2009 was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated. Reference is made to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, which includes information necessary for understanding our business and financial statement presentations. In particular, our significant accounting policies are presented in Note 2, Significant Accounting Policies, to the consolidated financial statements included in that report.

These consolidated interim financial statements are unaudited. These statements include all adjustments, including normal recurring accruals, that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for the fair statement of results for interim periods. The results reported in these consolidated interim financial statements should not be regarded as necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the entire year. For example, the timing and magnitude of claim losses incurred by our insurance subsidiaries due to the estimation process inherent in determining the liability for losses and loss adjustment expenses (“LAE”) can be relatively more significant to results of interim periods than to results for a full year. Also, variations in the amount and timing of realized investment gains and losses could cause significant variations in periodic net income.

Stock Split

On January 15, 2010, we declared a three-for-two stock split of our common shares in the form of a 50 percent stock dividend payable on March 8, 2010 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on February 8, 2010 (the record date). Fractional shares were settled in cash based on the average of the high and low sale prices for FPIC common stock reported on the Nasdaq Stock Market on the record date. The common stock issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the basic and diluted earnings per common share for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2009 have been retroactively restated. The table below shows our historical earnings per common share and the effect of the stock split.

Form 10-Q: 8

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except earnings per common share)	Basic earnings per common share:			Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding		Diluted earnings per common share:			Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding
For the three months ended
Revised, June 30, 2009	$	0.83			11,100	$	0.81			11,300
Historical, June 30, 2009		1.24			7,400		1.22			7,533
Increase (Decrease)	$	(0.41	)		3,700	$	(0.41	)		3,767

For the six months ended
Revised, June 30, 2009	$	1.56			11,291	$	1.53			11,520
Historical, June 30, 2009		2.34			7,527		2.29			7,680
Increase (Decrease)	$	(0.78	)		3,764	$	(0.76	)		3,840

New Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance on Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures: Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. The new guidance requires disclosures of transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements, including a description of the reason for the transfer. The new guidance also calls for disclosures about the activity in Level 3 measurements by separately presenting information on purchases, sales, issuances and settlements on a gross basis rather than as a single net number. The guidance also clarifies 1) the level of disaggregation that should be used in completing disclosures about fair value measurements and 2) the disclosures required in describing the inputs and valuation techniques used for both nonrecurring and recurring fair value measurements. We adopted the new disclosures and clarified our existing disclosures in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. See Note 2 for additional information. The disclosures about the activity in Level 3 measurements will be effective in the first quarter of 2011 (three months ending March 31, 2011).

In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance on the Consolidations: Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities. The new guidance addresses (1) the effects on certain provisions of the accounting guidance as a result of the elimination of the qualifying special-purpose entity concept and (2) constituent concerns about the application of certain key provisions, including those in which the accounting and disclosures under the Interpretation do not always provide timely and useful information about an enterprise’s involvement in a variable interest entity. We adopted the guidance on January 1, 2010. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.

2.	Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price methodology). We utilize market data or assumptions that we believe market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated or generally unobservable. We have primarily applied the market approach for recurring fair value measurements and endeavor to utilize the most important information available to us. Accordingly, we utilize valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. We then classify fair value balances based on the observability of those inputs.

Form 10-Q: 9

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

The fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets and the lowest priority to unobservable data.

●	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets: Level 1 includes unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

●

Significant Other Observable Inputs: Level 2 includes inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for assets or liabilities either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include, among other items, quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability such as interest rates and yield curves.

●	Significant Unobservable Inputs: Level 3 inputs are unobservable and reflect management’s judgments about assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Reclassifications impacting Level 3 financial instruments are reported as transfers in (out) of the Level 3 category as of the beginning of the period in which the transfer occurs. Therefore, gains and losses in income only reflect activity for the period the instrument was classified in Level 3.

The following is a description of the valuation measurements used for our financial instruments carried or disclosed at fair value, as well as the general classification of such financial instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.

Valuation of Investments

We primarily use a single pricing service, Interactive Data Corporation (“IDC”), to value our investments that have an exchange traded price or multiple observable inputs. In situations where IDC does not have multiple observable inputs or the ability to price a given security, we seek to price the security utilizing another pricing service or by obtaining non-binding broker / dealer quotes.

On a quarterly basis, we obtain and review the pricing methodology of our pricing service to ensure that our fair value designations are classified in accordance with the fair value hierarchy. Our pricing service provides a single price per security. We review the results of our pricing service for reasonableness each quarter by comparing market values reported on an individual security basis and on an overall portfolio basis to those obtained from our external investment manager to determine that the market value reported by our pricing service appears reasonable. In addition, an annual SAS 70 report that describes procedures surrounding the compilation and reporting of security prices obtained from our pricing service is provided to us. We may adjust the valuation of securities from the independent pricing service if we believe a security’s price does not fairly represent the market value of the investment. For example, when market observable data is not as readily available or if the security trades in an inactive market, the valuation of financial instruments becomes more subjective and could involve substantial judgment resulting in Level 3 pricing. To date, we have not adjusted any prices supplied by our pricing service.

Form 10-Q: 10

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

All securities priced by our pricing service using an exchange traded price are designated by us as Level 1. We designate as Level 2 those securities not actively traded on an exchange for which our pricing service utilizes multiple verifiable observable inputs. For securities that do not have multiple observable inputs (Level 3), we do not rely on a price from our pricing service.

Cash equivalents

●

Cash equivalents include liquid instruments with an original maturity of three months or less when acquired. Instruments, typically mutual funds that trade in active markets, are classified within Level 1 as their fair value is based on quoted market prices for identical assets as of the reporting date. Other instruments, typically Treasury securities and corporate debt securities, are classified within Level 2 because they trade in less active markets. Their fair value is based on valuation methodologies, the significant inputs into which include, but are not limited to, benchmark yields, reported trades, broker / dealer quotes and issuer spreads.

Fixed income securities, available for sale, including short-term investments

●

These securities trade in less active markets. Fair value is based on valuation methodologies, the significant inputs into which may include, but are not limited to, benchmark yields, reported trades, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, new issue data, bids, offers, collateral performance and reference data. These fixed income securities are classified within Level 2. Credit ratings noted below are based on the lower of the available credit ratings from S&P and Moody’s for each investment security.

●	U.S. Treasuries include those securities issued by the U.S government or a U.S. Agency. The average credit quality of these securities is AAA and represents approximately 6 percent of our fixed income securities.

●

States, municipalities and political subdivisions include securities issued by state and local governments. General obligation bonds are backed by the full faith and credit of the issuing entity (e.g., government authority) and revenue bonds are backed by a specific revenue stream. Lease revenue bonds are backed by specific lease arrangements, where the principal and interest are generally paid from annual appropriations from the government entity that benefits from the facility (e.g., school, prison facility). Pre-refunded bonds are backed by Treasuries and/or Agencies. These 'sub'-sectors (e.g., general obligation, revenue, lease, pre-refunded) can be taxable or tax-advantaged. These securities are diversified throughout the U.S, have an average credit quality of AA and represent approximately 35 percent of our fixed income securities.

●

Corporate securities include securities issued by various corporate entities across different industries. Both investment grade and non-investment grade securities are included within this category. The average credit quality of investment grade corporate securities is A and represents approximately 31 percent of our fixed income securities. The average credit quality of non-investment grade corporate securities is BB- and represents approximately 3 percent of our fixed income securities.

Form 10-Q: 11

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

●

Residential mortgage-backed securities include structured securities that are issued based on underlying residential mortgages. Within this category are bonds that are agency and non-agency related. Agency related bonds are from the vintage years 1988 – 2010, have an average credit quality of AAA and represent approximately 12 percent of our fixed income securities. Non-agency related bonds are from the vintage years 2002 – 2007, have an average credit quality of BBB- and represent approximately 1 percent of our fixed income securities.

●

Commercial mortgage-backed securities include structured securities issued based on underlying commercial mortgages (such as on hotels, malls, or offices) and are from the vintage years 2002 and 2005 through 2008. The securities have an average credit quality of AA- and represent approximately 5 percent of our fixed income securities.

●	Asset-backed securities include structured securities issued based on underlying assets, primarily automobile loans, credit cards, and home equity lines of credit. The average credit quality of these securities is AA and represents approximately 5 percent of our fixed income securities.

●	Foreign government securities include securities issued by the Canadian government, a Canadian agency or one of its provinces. The average credit quality of these securities is AA and represents 1 percent of our fixed income securities.

Equity securities, available for sale

●	Common and preferred equity securities that trade in active markets are classified within Level 1, as fair values are based on quoted market prices for identical assets as of the reporting date.

●	Preferred equity securities that trade in less active markets are classified within Level 2, as fair values are based on valuation methodologies, the significant inputs into which may include, but are not limited to, benchmark yields, reported trades, broker / dealer quotes and issuer spreads.

Other invested assets

●	Other invested assets include investments held as part of our deferred compensation plan and an investment in a non-public entity.

●	Securities, predominantly mutual funds, held in rabbi trusts maintained by the Company for deferred compensation plans, are included in other invested assets and classified within the valuation hierarchy on the same basis as the Company’s actively traded equity securities.

●	For our investment in the non-public entity, fair value is classified as Level 3, as it is based on net asset values and financial statements of the non-public entity.

Form 10-Q: 12

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

Contingent consideration

●

The acquisition of Advocate, MD includes a contingent consideration arrangement that provides for additional consideration to be paid by FPIC for Advocate, MD based on its attainment of targets with respect to direct written premiums, combined ratio and underwriting profits. Up to 40 percent of the contingent consideration is payable one year from the acquisition date with the remaining balance due two years from the acquisition date. The range of undiscounted amounts we could pay under the contingent consideration agreement is between $0.9 million and $12.0 million. Our measure of the estimated fair value of the contingent consideration is based on significant inputs not observable in the marketplace and is referred to as a Level 3 fair value measurement based on accounting guidance. We recognized a liability for the estimated fair value of acquisition-related contingent consideration using a cash flow model assuming probability weighted targets to be achieved over the earn-out period.

Derivative financial instruments

●

Our derivative instruments, principally interest rate swaps, are valued using models that primarily use market observable inputs and are classified as Level 2, as their fair value is largely based on observable inputs over the life of the swaps in a liquid market. The fair value of the interest rate swaps is calculated by comparing the stream of cash flows on the fixed rate debt versus the stream of cash flows that would arise under the floating rate debt. The floating and fixed rate cash flows are then discounted to the valuation date by using the three-month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) at the date of the valuation. Pricing inputs include bid-ask spreads and current market prices for an underlying instrument. For additional information on our derivative instruments, see Note 8 below.

Form 10-Q: 13

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

The following tables’ present disclosures about fair value measurements at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. For additional information regarding our fair value measurements see Note 4, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

(in thousands)	As of June 30, 2010
	Fair Value Measurements Using:						Netting			Assets / Liabilities
	(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		Adjustments (1)			at Fair Value
Assets
Fixed income securities, available-for-sale, including short-term investments
U.S. Treasuries	$	—		40,444		—		—			40,444
States, municipalities and political subdivisions		—		229,169		—		—			229,169
Corporate debt securities		—		217,394		—		—			217,394
Residential mortgage-backed securities		—		86,525		—		—			86,525
Commercial mortgage-backed securities		—		35,471		—		—			35,471
Asset-backed securities		—		32,109		—		—			32,109
Foreign government securities		—		6,540		—		—			6,540
Total fixed income securities, available-for-sale, including short-term investments	$	—		647,652		—		—			647,652

Equity securities, available-for-sale
Common equity securities	$	8,753		—		—		—			8,753
Preferred equity securities		815		537		—		—			1,352
Total equity securities, available-for-sale	$	9,568		537		—		—			10,105

Other invested assets
Deferred compensation plan assets held in rabbi trust	$	3,075		—		—		—			3,075
Limited partnership		—		—		75		—			75
Total other invested assets	$	3,075		—		75		—			3,150

Total	$	12,643		648,189		75		—			660,907

Liabilities
Derivative financial instruments	$	—		3,445		—		(2,670	)		775
Contingent consideration		—		—		6,718		—			6,718
Total	$	—		3,445		6,718		(2,670	)		7,493


(1)	Amounts represent the impact of legally enforceable master netting agreements that allow FPIC to settle the position and also cash collateral held or placed with the same counter parties.

Form 10-Q: 14

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands)	As of December 31, 2009
	Fair Value Measurements Using:						Netting			Assets / Liabilities
	(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		Adjustments (1)			at Fair Value
Assets
Fixed income securities, available-for-sale, including short-term investments
U.S. Treasuries	$	—		41,229		—		—			41,229
States, municipalities and political subdivisions		—		251,849		—		—			251,849
Corporate debt securities		—		202,495		—		—			202,495
Residential mortgage-backed securities		—		102,212		—		—			102,212
Commercial mortgage-backed securities		—		34,774		—		—			34,774
Asset-backed securities		—		33,084		—		—			33,084
Total fixed income securities, available-for-sale, including short-term investments	$	—		665,643		—		—			665,643

Equity securities, available-for-sale
Common equity securities	$	9,859									9,859
Preferred equity securities		825		528		—		—			1,353
Total equity securities, available-for-sale	$	10,684		528		—		—			11,212

Other invested assets
Deferred compensation plan assets held in rabbi trust	$	3,283		—		—		—			3,283
Limited partnership		—		—		77		—			77
Total other invested assets	$	3,283		—		77		—			3,360

Total	$	13,967		666,171		77		—			680,215

Liabilities
Derivative financial instruments	$	—		2,601		—		(2,260	)		341
Contingent consideration		—		—		7,008		—			7,008
Total	$	—		2,601		7,008		(2,260	)		7,349


(1)	Amounts represent the impact of legally enforceable master netting agreements that allow FPIC to settle the position and also cash collateral held or placed with the same counter parties.

Form 10-Q: 15

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

We had no transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements during the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010. The following table presents disclosures about fair value measurements at June 30, 2010 and 2009 using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). There were no changes in unrealized gains or losses recorded in net income during the six months ended June 30, 2010 or 2009 for Level 3 assets or liabilities still held at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.

(in thousands)	For the three months ended						For the three months ended
	June 30, 2010						June 30, 2009
	Other Invested Assets			Contingent Consideration			Other Invested Assets			Contingent Consideration
Beginning balance	$	75			(7,008	)	$	87			—
Total gains (losses) (realized and unrealized)
Included in net income		(3	)		290			1			—
Included in other comprehensive income		3			—			—			—
Purchases, issuances and settlements		—			—			—			—
Transfers in and / or out of Level 3		—			—			—			—
Ending balance	$	75			(6,718	)	$	88			—


(in thousands)	For the six months ended						For the six months ended
	June 30, 2010						June 30, 2009
	Other Invested Assets			Contingent Consideration			Other Invested Assets			Contingent Consideration
Beginning balance	$	77			(7,008	)	$	84			—
Total gains (losses) (realized and unrealized)
Included in net income		(10	)		290			25			—
Included in other comprehensive income		8			—			(21	)		—
Purchases, issuances and settlements		—			—			—			—
Transfers in and / or out of Level 3		—			—			—			—
Ending balance	$	75			(6,718	)	$	88			—

The following table summarizes gains and losses due to changes in fair value, including both realized and unrealized gains and losses, recorded in earnings and other comprehensive income for Level 3 assets or liabilities during the three months and six months ending June 30, 2010 and 2009.

(in thousands)	For the three months ended					For the three months ended
	June 30, 2010					June 30, 2009
	Other Invested Assets			Contingent Consideration		Other Invested Assets			Contingent Consideration
Total gains (losses) - (realized & unrealized)
Included in net income	$	(3	)		290	$	1			—
Included in other comprehensive income	$	3			—	$	—			—

(in thousands)	For the six months ended					For the six months ended
	June 30, 2010					June 30, 2009
	Other Invested Assets			Contingent Consideration		Other Invested Assets			Contingent Consideration
Total gains (losses) - (realized & unrealized)
Included in net income	$	(10	)		290	$	25			—
Included in other comprehensive income	$	8			—	$	(21	)		—

Form 10-Q: 16

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

3.	Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying value and fair value of financial instruments as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are presented in the following table. For additional information regarding the fair value of financial instruments see Note 5, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

(in thousands)	As of June 30, 2010				As of December 31, 2009
	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Carrying Value		Fair Value
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	68,628		68,628		58,626		58,626
Other invested assets
Deferred compensation plan assets held in rabbi trust		3,075		3,075		3,283		3,283
Limited partnership		75		75		77		77
Other assets		1,083		1,083		1,083		1,083
Total other invested assets		4,233		4,233		4,443		4,443

Total financial assets	$	72,861		72,861		63,069		63,069

Financial liabilities:
Long-term debt	$	46,083		50,834		46,083		48,925
Derivative financial instruments		3,445		3,445		2,601		2,601
Total financial liabilities	$	49,528		54,279		48,684		51,526

Form 10-Q: 17

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

4.	Investments

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of our investments are presented in the following tables. For additional information regarding our investments see Note 6, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

(in thousands)	As of June 30, 2010
	Amortized cost of investments		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value
Fixed income securities, available-for-sale, including short-term investments
U.S. Treasuries	$	38,828		1,616		—		40,444
States, municipalities and political subdivisions		220,782		8,400		13		229,169
Corporate debt securities		204,842		12,883		331		217,394
Residential mortgage-backed securities		84,617		2,821		913		86,525
Commercial mortgage-backed securities		34,162		2,071		762		35,471
Asset-backed securities		31,120		1,010		21		32,109
Foreign government securities		6,419		121		—		6,540
Equity securities, available-for-sale		9,605		577		77		10,105
Other invested assets		4,261		—		28		4,233
Total fixed income and equity securities, available-for-sale and other invested assets	$	634,636		29,499		2,145		661,990

(in thousands)	As of December 31, 2009
	Amortized cost of investments		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value
Fixed income securities, available-for-sale, including short-term investments
U.S. Treasuries	$	41,330		872		973		41,229
States, municipalities and political subdivisions		244,203		7,868		222		251,849
Corporate debt securities		192,934		10,035		474		202,495
Residential mortgage-backed securities		102,028		2,104		1,920		102,212
Commercial mortgage-backed securities		36,272		1,094		2,592		34,774
Asset-backed securities		32,047		1,083		46		33,084
Equity securities, available-for-sale		10,017		1,195		—		11,212
Other invested assets		4,473		—		30		4,443
Total fixed income and equity securities, available-for-sale and other invested assets	$	663,304		24,251		6,257		681,298

Form 10-Q: 18

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

The following tables summarize, for all investments in an unrealized loss position, the aggregate fair value and gross unrealized loss by length of time the securities have continuously been in an unrealized loss position.

(in thousands)	As of June 30, 2010
	Total				Less Than Twelve Months				Twelve Months or More
	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss
Fixed income securities, available-for-sale, including short-term investments
U.S. Treasury securities	$	—		—		—		—		—		—
States, municipalities and political subdivisions		2,066		13		2,066		13		—		—
Corporate debt securities		8,880		331		5,573		82		3,307		249
Residential mortgage-backed securities		23,017		913		13,818		133		9,199		780
Commercial mortgage-backed securities		4,782		762		509		1		4,273		761
Asset-backed securities		2,268		21		2,138		5		130		16
Equity securities, available-for-sale		1,471		77		1,471		77		—		—
Other invested assets		75		28		—		—		75		28
Total fixed income and equity securities, available-for-sale and other invested assets	$	42,559		2,145		25,575		311		16,984		1,834

(in thousands)	As of December 31, 2009
	Total				Less Than Twelve Months				Twelve Months or More
	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss
Fixed income securities, available-for-sale, including short-term investments
U.S. Treasury securities	$	22,428		973		22,428		973		—		—
States, municipalities and political subdivisions		21,074		222		20,588		189		486		33
Corporate debt securities		31,176		474		23,428		116		7,748		358
Residential mortgage-backed securities		39,056		1,920		30,784		459		8,272		1,461
Commercial mortgage-backed securities		19,594		2,592		1,881		20		17,713		2,572
Asset-backed securities		663		46		564		25		99		21
Equity securities, available-for-sale		—		—		—		—		—		—
Other invested assets		77		30		—		—		77		30
Total fixed income and equity securities, available-for-sale and other invested assets	$	134,068		6,257		99,673		1,782		34,395		4,475

Form 10-Q: 19

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

The number of securities with gross unrealized gains and losses is presented in the table below. Gross unrealized losses are further segregated by the length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position.

	Gross Unrealized Losses
	Less than twelve months		Twelve months or more		Gross Unrealized Gains
As of June 30, 2010		75		40		651
As of December 31, 2009		179		59		537

The fair value and gross unrealized losses of those securities in a continuous unrealized loss position for greater than 12 months is presented in the table below. Gross unrealized losses are further segregated by the percentage of amortized cost.

(in thousands)	As of June 30, 2010
Gross Unrealized Losses	Number of Securities		Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
Less than 15%		34	$	15,009		(1,076	)
Greater than 15%		6		1,975		(758	)
		40	$	16,984		(1,834	)

The following table sets forth the amount of gross unrealized losses by current severity (as compared to amortized cost) and length of time that the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of June 30, 2010.

(in thousands)						Severity of Gross Unrealized Losses
Length of Gross Unrealized Losses	Fair Value of Securities with Gross Unrealized Losses		Gross Unrealized Losses			Less than 5 percent			5 percent to 15 percent			Greater than 15 percent
Less than twelve months	$	25,575		(311	)		(306	)		—			(5	)
Twelve months or more		16,984		(1,834	)		(96	)		(980	)		(758	)
Total	$	42,559		(2,145	)		(402	)		(980	)		(763	)

Other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”)

We separate OTTI into the following two components: (i) the amount related to credit losses, which is recognized in the consolidated statements of income, and (ii) the amount related to all other factors, which is recorded in other comprehensive income (loss). The credit-related portion of an OTTI is measured by comparing a security’s amortized cost to the present value of its current expected cash flows discounted at its effective yield prior to the impairment charge. The determination of whether unrealized losses are “other-than-temporary” requires judgment based on objective as well as subjective factors. We evaluate our investment portfolio on an ongoing basis to identify securities that may be other-than-temporarily impaired. Changes in fair value are evaluated to determine the extent to which such changes are attributable to (i) fundamental factors specific to the issuer or (ii) market-related factors such as interest rates or sector declines.

Form 10-Q: 20

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

The issuer-specific factors considered in reaching the conclusion that securities with declines are not other-than-temporary include (i) the extent and duration of the decline in fair value, including the duration of any significant decline in value, (ii) whether the security is current as to payments of principal and interest, (iii) a valuation of any underlying collateral, (iv) current and future conditions and trends for both the business and its industry, (v) changes in cash flow assumptions for collateralized mortgage obligations and (vi) rating agency actions. Based on our assessment of these factors, we will make a determination as to the probability of recovering principal and interest on the security.

We did not recognize any other-than-temporary impairments of securities during the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. The number and amount of securities for which we have recorded OTTI charges for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 are presented in the following table.

(in thousands)	Fixed income securities, available-for-sale			Equity securities, available-for-sale		Other invested assets		Portion of OTTI recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income		Net OTTI recognized in net income
For the six months ended June 30, 2010
OTTI	$	(766	)		—		—		503	$	(263	)
Number of securities		5			—		—		—		5

For the six months ended June 30, 2009
OTTI	$	(1,355	)		—		—		—	$	(1,355	)
Number of securities		4			—		—		—		4

We believe the remaining securities having unrealized losses as of June 30, 2010 are not other-than-temporarily impaired. We do not intend to sell any of these securities and it is more likely than not that we will not be required to sell any of these securities before the recovery of their amortized cost basis.

Realized investment gains (losses)

Realized investment gains and losses are determined on the basis of specific identification. The components of net realized gains (losses) on investments are as follows:

(in thousands)	For the three months ended June 30, 2010
	Fixed income securities, available-for-sale and short-term investments			Equity securities, available-for-sale		Other invested assets			Total
Gross realized gains	$	839			—		—		$	839
Gross realized losses		(3	)		—		(6	)		(9	)
Credit related impairment losses		—			—		—			—
Net realized investment gains (losses)	$	836			—		(6	)	$	830

Proceeds from sales or maturities	$	47,987			—		—		$	47,987

Form 10-Q: 21

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands)	For the three months ended June 30, 2009
	Fixed income securities, available-for-sale and short-term investments			Equity securities, available-for-sale		Other invested assets			Total
Gross realized gains	$	934			—		95		$	1,029
Gross realized losses		(2	)		—		(2	)		(4	)
Credit related impairment losses		—			—		—			—
Net realized investment gains (losses)	$	932			—		93		$	1,025

Proceeds from sales or maturities	$	44,988			—		—		$	44,988

(in thousands)	For the six months ended June 30, 2010
	Fixed income securities, available-for-sale and short-term investments			Equity securities, available-for-sale		Other invested assets			Total
Gross realized gains	$	1,379			87		41		$	1,507
Gross realized losses		(58	)		—		(6	)		(64	)
Credit related impairment losses		(263	)		—		—			(263	)
Net realized investment gains (losses)	$	1,058			87		35		$	1,180

Proceeds from sales or maturities	$	115,157			499		393		$	116,049

(in thousands)	For the six months ended June 30, 2009
	Fixed income securities, available-for-sale and short-term investments			Equity securities, available-for-sale			Other invested assets			Total
Gross realized gains	$	2,370			140			136		$	2,646
Gross realized losses		(108	)		(149	)		(67	)		(324	)
Credit related impairment losses		(1,355	)		—			—			(1,355	)
Net realized investment gains (losses)	$	907			(9	)		69		$	967

Proceeds from sales or maturities	$	100,287			393			178		$	100,858

Form 10-Q: 22

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

Net investment income

The major categories of investment income follow:

(in thousands)	For the three months ended June 30,						For the six months ended June 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Fixed income securities, available-for-sale and short-term investments	$	6,680			7,288		$	13,727			14,863
Equity securities, available-for-sale		90			115			160			228
Other invested assets		183			179			281			359
Cash and cash equivalents		10			20			18			95
Total investment income		6,963			7,602			14,186			15,545
Less: Investment expense		(710	)		(480	)		(1,346	)		(1,204	)
Net investment income	$	6,253			7,122		$	12,840			14,341

Contractual maturities

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of fixed income securities, available-for-sale, and short-term investments by contractual maturity are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay these obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

(in thousands)	As of June 30, 2010				As of December 31, 2009
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Due in one year or less	$	75,556		76,643		74,101		75,111
Due after one year through five years		190,859		200,052		222,513		231,797
Due after five years through ten years		153,738		163,407		144,229		149,612
Due after ten years		50,718		53,445		37,624		39,053
		470,871		493,547		478,467		495,573
Mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities		149,899		154,105		170,347		170,070
Total fixed income securities, available-for-sale and short-term investments	$	620,770		647,652		648,814		665,643

5.	Goodwill and Intangible Assets

As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, identifiable intangibles consisted of the following:

(in thousands)			As of June 30, 2010
	Projected Useful Life (years)		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Amortization Expense		Net Carrying Amount
State licenses	Indefinite		$	250		—		—		250
Trade name - Advocate, MD	Indefinite			530		—		—		530
Non-competes		4.7		2,371		314		254		2,057
Customer relationships		10		4,128		263		205		3,865
			$	7,279		577		459		6,702

Form 10-Q: 23

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands)			As of December 31, 2009
	Projected Useful Life (years)		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Amortization Expense		Net Carrying Amount
State licenses	Indefinite		$	250		—		—		250
Trade name - Advocate, MD	Indefinite			530		—		—		530
Non-competes		4.7		2,371		60		60		2,311
Customer relationships		10		4,128		58		58		4,070
			$	7,279		118		118		7,161

Estimated aggregate amortization expense for the remainder of 2010 and each of the next four years is presented in the following table:

(in thousands)	Other underwriting expenses		Other expenses		Total
Remaining 2010	$	252		207		459
2011		413		504		917
2012		413		504		917
2013		413		504		917
2014		413		290		703
Total	$	1,904		2,009		3,913

Other income for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010 includes an adjustment to the fair value of contingent consideration under the earnout agreement associated with the acquisition of Advocate, MD. The fair value of the contingent consideration is currently estimated to be $6.7 million, reflecting an adjustment to decrease the estimated contingent consideration by approximately $0.3 million for slight changes in projected performance under the agreement. For additional information, see Note 2, Fair Value Measurements.

6.	Liability for Losses and LAE

We establish loss and LAE reserves taking into account the results of multiple actuarial techniques applied as well as other assumptions and factors regarding our business. Each actuarial technique is applied in a consistent manner from period to period and the techniques encompass a review of selected claims data, including claim and incident counts, average indemnity payments, and loss adjustment costs. Estimating loss and LAE reserves is a complex process and changes in key assumptions or trends could result in a significant change in our reserve estimates. Given the magnitude of our reserves, even relatively small changes in our estimates for factors such as the number of claims we expect to pay or the amount we expect to ultimately pay for such claims could have a significant impact on our reserves and, correspondingly, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. For additional information regarding our liability for losses and LAE see Note 8, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Form 10-Q: 24

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

As a result of the continuation of favorable overall claim results as compared to our previous estimates, we recognized favorable net loss development related to previously established reserves of $5.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 and $9.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. The favorable development recognized in 2010 reflects lower than expected ultimate losses primarily for the 2005 through 2007 accident years as a result of reductions in our estimates of incident to claim development, payment frequency and payment severity for those accident years as compared to previous estimates.

7.	Reinsurance

The effects of reinsurance on premiums written, premiums earned, and losses and LAE incurred are presented in the following table. For additional information regarding our reinsurance program see Note 9, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

(in thousands)	For the three months ended June 30,
	2010						2009
	Written			Earned			Written			Earned
Direct and assumed
FPIC pre-acquisition business	$	37,473			41,123			36,506			43,571
Advocate, MD		5,773			7,419			—			—
Consolidated		43,246			48,542			36,506			43,571

Ceded
FPIC pre-acquisition business		(4,931	)		(5,653	)		(5,131	)		(5,903	)
Advocate, MD		(702	)		(1,046	)		—			—
Consolidated		(5,633	)		(6,699	)		(5,131	)		(5,903	)

Net	$	37,613			41,843			31,375			37,668

(in thousands)	For the six months ended June 30,
	2010						2009
	Written			Earned			Written			Earned
Direct and assumed
FPIC pre-acquisition business	$	81,772			82,734			82,110			87,808
Advocate, MD		10,591			14,181			—			—
Consolidated		92,363			96,915			82,110			87,808

Ceded
FPIC pre-acquisition business		(11,109	)		(11,252	)		(11,476	)		(11,728	)
Advocate, MD		(1,394	)		(1,884	)		—			—
Consolidated		(12,503	)		(13,136	)		(11,476	)		(11,728	)

Net	$	79,860			83,779			70,634			76,080

Form 10-Q: 25

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands)	For the three months ended June 30,						For the six months ended June 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Losses and LAE
FPIC pre-acquisition business	$	24,989			25,670		$	50,233			52,785
Advocate, MD		3,857			—			7,468			—
Consolidated		28,846			25,670			57,701			52,785

Reinsurance recoveries
FPIC pre-acquisition business		(3,911	)		(3,930	)		(7,461	)		(7,805	)
Advocate, MD		157			—			279			—
Consolidated		(3,754	)		(3,930	)		(7,182	)		(7,805	)

Net losses and LAE	$	25,092			21,740		$	50,519			44,980

Beginning January 1, 2010, our subsidiaries, First Professionals Insurance Company, Inc. (“First Professionals”) and Advocate, MD Insurance of the Southwest Inc. (“Advocate, MD Insurance”), entered into a 50 percent quota share reinsurance agreement for all policies effective January 1, 2010 and later. Under the terms of the agreement, Advocate, MD Insurance cedes and First Professionals assumes 50 percent of the net premiums and losses of Advocate, MD Insurance. Advocate, MD Insurance receives a 25 percent ceding commission. The quota share reinsurance is considered “a funds withheld agreement” whereby no amounts are paid unless the funds withheld account goes below $0, which would only occur when payments ceded under the agreement exceed premiums ceded net of the ceding commission. The impact of this agreement between First Professionals and Advocate, MD Insurance has been eliminated in consolidation.

We purchase reinsurance from a number of companies to mitigate concentrations of credit risk, and utilize our reinsurance broker to assist us in the analysis of the credit quality of our reinsurers. We base our reinsurance buying decisions on an evaluation of the then current financial strength and stability of prospective reinsurers. However, the financial strength of our reinsurers, and their corresponding ability to pay us, may change in the future due to forces or events we cannot control or anticipate. As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, our receivable from reinsurers, net of amounts due, was $143.4 million and $146.2 million, respectively. We have not experienced any difficulty in collecting amounts due from reinsurers related to the financial condition of a reinsurer. Should future events lead us to believe that any reinsurer is unable to meet its obligations, adjustments to the amounts recoverable would be reflected in the results of current operations.

Form 10-Q: 26

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

8.	Derivative Instruments and Hedging Strategies

We use hedging contracts to manage the risk of our exposure to interest rate changes associated with our variable rate debt. All of our designated hedging instruments are considered to be cash flow hedges. Our derivative transactions represent a hedge of specified cash flows. As a result, these interest rate swaps are derivatives and were designated as cash flow hedging instruments at the initiation of the swaps. We formally document qualifying hedged transactions and hedging instruments, and assess, both at inception of the contract and on an ongoing basis, whether the hedging instruments are effective in offsetting changes in cash flows of the hedged transaction. At the end of each period, the interest rate swaps are recorded in the consolidated statement of financial position at fair value, in other assets if the hedge is in an asset position, or in other liabilities if it is in a liability position. Any related increases or decreases in fair value are recognized in our consolidated statement of financial position in accumulated other comprehensive income.

We consider our interest rate swaps to be a Level 2 measurement under the fair value hierarchy, as their fair value is largely based on observable inputs over the life of the swaps in a liquid market. The fair value of the interest rate swaps is calculated by comparing the stream of cash flows on the fixed rate debt versus the stream of cash flows that would arise under the floating rate debt. The floating and fixed rate cash flows are then discounted to the valuation date by using the three month LIBOR at the date of the valuation. The valuation of the interest rate swap can be sensitive to changes in current and future three month LIBOR rates, which can have a material impact on the fair value of the derivatives. However, as these swaps are used to manage our cash outflows, these changes will not materially impact our liquidity and capital resources. Furthermore, since the interest rate swaps are deemed as effective hedging instruments, these changes do not impact income from operations.

Interest rate risk. We are exposed to interest rate risk associated with fluctuations in the interest rates on our variable interest rate debt. In order to manage this risk, we have entered into interest rate swaps that convert the debt's variable rate debt to fixed rate debt. As of June 30, 2010, we had long-term debt obligations of $46.1 million, comprised of $10.0 million in senior notes and $36.1 million in junior subordinated debentures. Our long-term debt obligations are uncollateralized and bear floating interest at rates equal to the three-month LIBOR plus an interest rate spread. Our floating interest rates are adjusted quarterly. We are required during the swap terms to make certain fixed rate payments to the counterparty calculated on the notional amount in exchange for receiving floating payments based on the three-month LIBOR for the same amount. The notional amounts on the contracts are not exchanged. The net effect of this accounting on our operating results is that interest expense on our floating rate indebtedness is recorded based on fixed interest rates.

Credit risk. By using interest rate-related derivative instruments to manage the exposure on our variable rate debt, we expose ourselves to credit risk. We are exposed to potential losses if the counterparty fails to perform according to the terms of its agreement. When the fair value of a derivative contract is positive (or in a net asset position), the counterparty owes us, which may present a credit risk for us. We manage our exposure to credit risk by entering into transactions with well-established financial institutions and by monitoring the financial strength ratings and financial developments of such institutions. In addition, only conventional derivative financial instruments are utilized.

Form 10-Q: 27

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

The terms of our derivative agreements require that we furnish collateral in the event that mark-to-market calculations result in settlement obligations owed by us to the counterparties in excess of $0.8 million. No other cash payments are made unless the swaps are terminated prior to maturity, in which case the amount paid or received at settlement is established by agreement at the time of termination, and usually represents the net present value, at current interest rates, of the remaining obligations to exchange payments under the terms of the contracts. In accordance with the accounting guidance for offsetting of receivables and payables and as allowed under our master netting arrangement with our counterparty, we have offset the fair value amounts recognized in the statement of financial position for our derivative instruments against the fair value amounts recognized for our right to reclaim cash collateral (a receivable). As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the cash collateral paid to our counterparty was $2.7 million and $2.3 million, respectively.

Assessment of hedge effectiveness. We assess the effectiveness of our interest rate swaps on a quarterly basis. We have considered the impact of credit market conditions in assessing the risk of counterparty default. We believe that it is likely that the counterparty for these swaps will continue to act throughout the contract period, and as a result we continue to deem the swaps as effective hedging instruments. We will perform subsequent assessments of hedge effectiveness by verifying and documenting whether the critical terms of the hedging instrument and the forecasted transaction have changed during the period, rather than by quantifying the relevant changes in cash flows. Based on the fact that, at inception, the critical terms of the hedging instruments and the hedged forecasted transaction were the same, we have concluded that we expect changes in cash flows attributable to the risk being hedged to be completely offset by the hedging derivatives and have assessed that our cash flow hedges have no ineffectiveness, as determined by the hypothetical derivative method. If the hedge on any of the interest rate swaps was deemed ineffective, or extinguished by either party, any accumulated gains or losses remaining in other comprehensive income would be fully recorded in interest expense during the relevant period.

The fair value of our derivative instruments has been recorded as follows:

Cash flow hedges designated as effective hedging instruments:

(in thousands)
	Notional		Balance Sheet	June 30, 2010			Receive			Pay			Maturity
Instrument	Amount		Location	Fair Value			Rate (1)			Rate			Date
Interest Rate Swap - A	$	5,000	Other Liabilities	$	(400	)		0.54	%		3.94	%	5/23/2013
Interest Rate Swap - B	$	15,000	Other Liabilities		(1,317	)		0.44	%		4.04	%	8/15/2013
Interest Rate Swap - C	$	15,000	Other Liabilities		(1,432	)		0.33	%		4.12	%	10/29/2013
Interest Rate Swap - D	$	10,000	Other Liabilities		(296	)		0.54	%		2.74	%	11/23/2011
				$	(3,445	)

(in thousands)
	Notional		Balance Sheet	December 31, 2009			Receive			Pay			Maturity
Instrument	Amount		Location	Fair Value			Rate (1)			Rate			Date
Interest Rate Swap - A	$	5,000	Other Liabilities	$	(299	)		0.26	%		3.94	%	5/23/2013
Interest Rate Swap - B	$	15,000	Other Liabilities		(969	)		0.27	%		4.04	%	8/15/2013
Interest Rate Swap - C	$	15,000	Other Liabilities		(1,041	)		0.28	%		4.12	%	10/29/2013
Interest Rate Swap - D	$	10,000	Other Liabilities		(292	)		0.26	%		2.74	%	11/23/2011
				$	(2,601	)


(1)	Based on the three month LIBOR.

Form 10-Q: 28

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

The effect of derivative instruments on the Consolidated Statement of Income was as follows:

Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships:

	Amount of gain (loss) recognized in other comprehensive income on the derivative					Location of gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into net income	Amount of gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into net income

Instrument	(Effective portion - in thousands)					(Effective portion)	(Effective portion - in thousands)

	For the three months ended June 30,						For the three months ended June 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Interest Rate Swap - A	$	(56	)	$	130	Interest expense	$	(45	)	$	(37	)
Interest Rate Swap - B		(204	)		425	Interest expense		(139	)		(113	)
Interest Rate Swap - C		(238	)		465	Interest expense		(145	)		(115	)
Interest Rate Swap - D		28			78	Interest expense		(60	)		(43	)
	$	(470	)	$	1,098		$	(389	)	$	(308	)

	Amount of gain (loss) recognized in other comprehensive income on the derivative					Location of gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into net income	Amount of gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into net income

Instrument	(Effective portion - in thousands)					(Effective portion)	(Effective portion - in thousands)

	For the six months ended June 30,						For the six months ended June 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Interest Rate Swap - A	$	(101	)	$	141	Interest expense	$	(91	)	$	(63	)
Interest Rate Swap - B		(348	)		474	Interest expense		(281	)		(200	)
Interest Rate Swap - C		(390	)		472	Interest expense		(290	)		(197	)
Interest Rate Swap - D		(4	)		47	Interest expense		(122	)		(66	)
	$	(843	)	$	1,134		$	(784	)	$	(526	)

There was no ineffectiveness recognized in net income for our derivative instruments during the three months and six months ending June 30, 2010 and 2009.

Form 10-Q: 29

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

9.	Earnings per Common Share

Basic and diluted earnings per common share and weighted-average common shares outstanding for the period ending June 30, 2009 have been restated to reflect the three-for-two stock split in March 2010. For additional information, see Note 1, Basis of Presentation and New Accounting Pronouncements. Data with respect to our basic and diluted earnings per common share are shown below.

(in thousands, except basic and diluted earnings per common share)	For the three months ended June 30,				For the six months ended June 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
Net income	$	7,491		9,191	$	14,706		17,579

Basic earnings per common share:	$	0.77		0.83	$	1.49		1.56

Diluted earnings per common share:	$	0.76		0.81	$	1.46		1.53

Basic weighted-average shares outstanding		9,710		11,100		9,842		11,291
Common stock equivalents (1)		192		200		199		229
Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding		9,902		11,300		10,041		11,520

(1)

Outstanding stock options totaling 178,151 and 172,228 for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per common share because the sum of the hypothetical amount of future proceeds from the exercise price, unrecorded compensation, and tax benefits to be credited to additional paid-in capital for such stock options were higher than the average price of the common shares, and therefore were anti-dilutive. No outstanding stock options for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010 were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per common share.

10.	Share-based Compensation Plans

We maintain three share-based compensation plans: (i) a plan for officers and key employees (the “Omnibus Plan”); (ii) a plan for non-employee directors (the “Director Plan”); and (iii) an employee stock purchase plan (the “ESPP”). For a description of these plans, see Note 15, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. The following table presents the number of shares authorized for future awards in connection with our share-based compensation plans.

	As of June 30, 2010		As of December 31, 2009 (1)
The Omnibus Plan		774,461		844,208
The Director Plan		376,202		389,702
The ESPP		97,830		104,559
Shares authorized for future awards		1,248,493		1,338,469


(1)	The number of common shares authorized for future awards as of December 31, 2009 has been restated to reflect a three-for-two stock split in March 2010.

Form 10-Q: 30

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

The following table presents the status of, and changes in, stock options. No stock options have been granted since 2007.

	Shares			Weighted-Average Exercise Price		Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term in Years		Total Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands)
Outstanding, January 1, 2010		507,127		$	17.21
Granted		—			—
Exercised		(77,250	)		11.35
Forfeited		—			—
Outstanding, June 30, 2010		429,877		$	18.26		4.3	$	3,250

Exercisable at June 30, 2010		429,877		$	18.26		4.3	$	3,250

		Options Outstanding								Options Exercisable
	Range of Prices per Share	Vested Number of Shares		Non-vested Number of Shares		Weighted-Average Exercise Price		Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life		Number of Shares		Weighted-Average Exercise Price
$	0.00-10.99		116,625		—	$	8.42		2.0		116,625	$	8.42
$	11.00-23.99		191,200		—		19.16		4.3		191,200		19.16
$	24.00-40.99		122,052		—		26.25		6.5		122,052		26.25
			429,877		—	$	18.26		4.3		429,877	$	18.26

The following table presents the status of, and changes in, restricted stock, including performance awards, as of June 30, 2010.

	Shares			Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value		Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term in Years	Total Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands)
Non-vested, January 1, 2010		208,404		$	27.15
Granted		81,419			26.50
Vested		(113,805	)		27.68
Forfeited		—			—
Non-vested, June 30, 2010		176,018		$	26.73	1.1	$ 4,515

During 2010 and 2009, aggregate awards of 47,039 and 54,097 performance units, respectively, were granted to employees under the Omnibus Plan. Generally, performance unit awards are subject to achieving specified levels of adjusted return on average equity during a two-year plan period. These awards also generally vest at the expiration of the same two-year period. The final determination of the number of shares to be issued in respect of an award (which can vary between 50 and 150 percent of the number of performance units subject to the award, provided a threshold performance level is achieved) is determined by the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors.

Form 10-Q: 31

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

As of June 30, 2010, there was $2.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted under our various plans, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 0.8 years. The compensation cost related to our share-based awards that was charged to other underwriting expense was $0.6 million and $1.3 million for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, compared to $0.8 million and $1.6 million for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.

11.	Employee Benefit Plans

The components of the actuarially computed net periodic pension cost, including the amounts recognized in other comprehensive income, for our benefit plans are summarized in the table below. For a description of our employee benefit plans, see Note 16 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

(in thousands)
	For the three months ended June 30,			For the six months ended June 30,
Net Periodic Benefit Cost:	2010		2009	2010		2009
Service cost	$	142	102	$	284	278
Interest cost		165	133		330	296
Expected return on plan assets		(108)	(77)		(216)	(153)
Amortization of prior service cost		1	1		2	2
Amortization of net loss		51	99		102	240
Net periodic benefit cost	$	251	258	$	502	663

(in thousands)

Other changes in plan assets and benefit
obligations recognized in other comprehensive	For the three months ended June 30,			For the six months ended June 30,
income (loss):	2010		2009	2010		2009
Net gain (loss)	$	(51)	(99)	$	(102)	(240)
Amortization of prior service cost		(1)	(1)		(2)	(2)
Total recognized in other comprehensive income (loss)		(52)	(100)		(104)	(242)
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive income (loss)	$	199	158	$	398	421

We contributed $0.1 million and $1.2 million to our employee benefit plans during the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, compared to $0.2 million and $1.0 million for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. We currently anticipate contributing an additional $0.2 million to these plans during the remainder of 2010 for total contributions of $1.4 million.

Form 10-Q: 32

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

12.	Commitments and Contingencies

We, in common with the insurance industry in general, are subject to litigation involving claims under our insurance policies in the normal course of business. We may also become involved in legal actions not involving claims under our insurance policies from time to time. We have evaluated such exposures as of June 30, 2010, and in all cases, believe our positions and defenses are meritorious. However, there can be no assurance as to the outcome of such exposures. Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments, litigation, fines and penalties and other sources are recorded when it is determined to be probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the assessment and/or remediation can be reasonably estimated.

In addition, our insurance subsidiaries may become subject to claims for extra-contractual obligations or risks in excess of policy limits in connection with their insurance claims, particularly in Florida. These claims are sometimes referred to as “bad faith” actions as it is alleged that the insurance company acted in bad faith in the administration of a claim against an insured. Bad faith actions generally occur in instances where an award or jury verdict exceeds the insured’s policy limits. Under such circumstances, it is routinely alleged that the insurance company failed to negotiate a settlement of the claim in good faith within the insured’s policy limit or otherwise failed to properly administer the claim. In recent years, policy limits for medical professional liability (“MPL”) insurance in Florida have trended downward. This trend and the current judicial climate have increased the incidence and size of awards and jury verdicts in excess of policy limits against Florida medical professionals insured by our competitors and us. Such awards and verdicts have resulted in an increased frequency of claims by insureds or plaintiffs in MPL actions alleging bad faith on the part of Florida MPL insurers or alleging other failures to properly administer claims. We have evaluated such exposures as of June 30, 2010, and believe our position and defenses are meritorious. However, there can be no assurance as to the outcome of such exposures. Our primary excess of loss reinsurance program includes a level of coverage for claims in excess of policy limits. (For additional information regarding our reinsurance coverage see Note 9, Reinsurance, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.) When establishing our liability for losses and LAE, we take our exposure for ECO/XPL claims into consideration, including with respect to payments in excess of policy limits that may be made in order to address potential future ECO/XPL exposure. In March 2010, First Professionals resolved two related claims from the 2002 accident year against an insured with payments in excess of each claim’s $1.0 million policy limit. The amount paid by First Professionals in excess of the policy limit was $10.0 million for each of the two claims, net of applicable reinsurance of $2.0 million per claim. Such amounts had been fully contemplated in previously established loss and LAE reserves. An award against us for extra-contractual liability or a significant jury award, or series of awards, against one or more of our insureds could ultimately result in the payment by us of potentially significant amounts in excess of the related policy limits, reserves and reinsurance coverage and could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Form 10-Q: 33

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

Our insurance subsidiaries are subject to assessment by the insurance guaranty associations in the states in which they conduct business for the provision of funds necessary for the settlement of covered claims under certain policies of insolvent insurers. Generally, these associations can assess member insurers on the basis of written premiums in their particular states. Between 2006 and 2009, we were assessed an aggregate of $14.7 million (including $1.2 million in 2009) by the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation (“Florida OIR”) at the request of the Florida Insurance Guaranty Association (“FIGA”) with respect to the insolvency of property and casualty insurance companies operating in Florida. Losses in excess of FIGA’s estimates could result in the need for additional assessments by FIGA. Such additional assessments or assessments related to other property and casualty insurers that have or may become insolvent because of hurricane activity or otherwise could adversely impact our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Under Florida law, our insurance subsidiaries are entitled to recoup insurance guaranty fund assessments from their Florida policyholders and will continue to do so until fully recovered. Through June 30, 2010, we have recovered $13.7 million of the above mentioned FIGA assessments levied between 2006 and 2009.

In addition to standard guaranty fund assessments, the Florida, Texas and Missouri legislatures could also levy special assessments to settle claims caused by certain catastrophic losses. No such special assessments for catastrophic losses have been made through the second quarter of 2010 or during 2009, 2008 or 2007. Medical malpractice policies have been exempted from assessment by the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund until the expiration of this exemption on May 31, 2013.

Form 10-Q: 34

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

For purposes of this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”), “FPIC,” “we,” “our,” “us,” and the “Company” refer to FPIC Insurance Group, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, unless the context requires otherwise. The following MD&A should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010, included in Part I, Item 1, as well as the audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, which was filed with the SEC on March 3, 2010.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including the following MD&A, contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, as well as assumptions that, if they do not materialize or prove correct, could cause our results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact are statements that could be deemed forward-looking statements, including statements: of our plans, strategies and objectives for future operations; concerning new products, services or developments; regarding future economic conditions, performance or outlook; as to the outcome of contingencies; of beliefs or expectations; and of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. Forward-looking statements may be identified by their use of forward-looking terminology, such as “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “should,” “would,” “will,” “intends,” “plans,” “estimates,” “anticipates,” “projects” and similar words or expressions. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect our management’s opinions only as of the date of the filing of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Factors that might cause our results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:

i)	The effect of negative developments and cyclical changes in the medical professional liability insurance business sector;
ii)	The effects of competition, including competition for agents to place insurance, of physicians electing to self-insure or to practice without insurance coverage, and of related trends and associated pricing pressures and developments;
iii)	Business risks that result from our size, products, and geographic concentration;
iv)	The risks and uncertainties involved in determining the rates we charge for our products and services, as well as these rates being subject to or mandated by legal requirements and regulatory approval;
v)	The uncertainties involved in the loss reserving process, including the possible occurrence of insured losses with a frequency or severity exceeding our estimates;
vi)	Our exposure to claims for extra contractual damages and losses in excess of policy limits and the unpredictability of court decisions;
vii)	Legislative, regulatory, special interest or consumer initiatives that may adversely affect our business, including initiatives seeking to lower premium rates;
viii)	The judicial and legislative review of current tort reform measures;

Form 10-Q: 35

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

ix)	Developments in financial and securities markets that could affect our investment portfolio;
x)	Assessments imposed by state financial guaranty associations or other insurance regulatory bodies;
xi)	Developments in reinsurance markets that could affect our reinsurance programs or our ability to collect reinsurance recoverables;
xii)	The impact of healthcare reform or other significant changes in the healthcare delivery system;
xiii)	Availability of dividends and management fees from our insurance subsidiaries;
xiv)	The results of the acquisition of Advocate, MD Financial Group Inc. (“Advocate, MD”) and other growth initiatives;
xv)	Impairment in the value of our acquisition-related or other goodwill and intangibles;
xvi)	The loss of the services of any key members of senior management;
xvii)	Changes in our financial ratings resulting from one or more of these uncertainties or other factors and the potential impact on our agents’ ability to place insurance business on our behalf; and
xviii)	Other factors discussed elsewhere in this report and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, including Item 1A. Risk Factors and Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, filed with the SEC on March 3, 2010.

Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of their dates. Forward-looking statements are made in reliance on the safe harbor provision of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.

Critical Accounting Policies

The accounting policies considered by management to be critically important in the preparation and understanding of our financial statements and related disclosures are presented in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

As described in Item 1. Financial Statements, Note 1, Basis of Presentation, New Accounting Pronouncements and Significant Accounting Policies, under the heading “New Accounting Pronouncements,” there are accounting pronouncements that have recently been issued. Note 1 describes the potential impact that these pronouncements are expected to have or have had on our consolidated financial statements.

Form 10-Q: 36

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

Commitments and Contingencies

For information concerning commitments and contingencies to which we are subject, see Item 1. Financial Statements, Note 12, Commitments and Contingencies.

Business Overview

We operate in the MPL insurance sector of the property and casualty insurance industry. Our primary insurance products provide protection for physicians, dentists and other healthcare providers as individual practitioners or as members of practice groups. Our insurance protects policyholders against losses arising from professional liability claims and the related defense costs with respect to injuries alleged to have been caused by medical error or malpractice. Optional coverage is available for professional corporations under which physicians or dentists practice. We are the largest provider of MPL insurance in Florida, the fourth largest provider in Texas and have top five market positions in Georgia and Arkansas. In all, we currently write MPL insurance in 13 states and are licensed to write in 32 states. Based on 2009 premiums reported by SNL Financial LC, Florida and Texas are the fifth and eighth largest markets, respectively, for MPL insurance in the United States in terms of direct premiums written. We focus on selected markets where we believe we have advantages in terms of our market knowledge, well-established reputation, meaningful market presence and resources.

Effective June 30, 2010, we merged Interlex Insurance Company (“Interlex”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Intermed Insurance Company (“Intermed”), into Intermed, a wholly owned subsidiary of First Professionals. Prior to the merger, Interlex participated in the intercompany pooling arrangement with our other insurance subsidiaries and prior to 2003 provided legal professional liability insurance in Missouri, Kansas and Florida.

On January 15, 2010, we declared a three-for-two stock split of our common shares in the form of a 50 percent stock dividend payable on March 8, 2010 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on February 8, 2010 (the record date). Fractional shares were settled in cash based on the average of the high and low sale prices for FPIC common stock reported on the Nasdaq Stock Market on the record date. The common stock issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2009 and the basic and diluted earnings per common share for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2009 have been retroactively restated.

In November 2009, we acquired all of the issued and outstanding stock of Advocate, MD, which then became a wholly owned subsidiary of First Professionals. Advocate, MD is the fourth largest provider of MPL insurance in Texas and also writes MPL insurance in Mississippi. We operate Advocate, MD through its current management team and facilities in Austin, Texas.

Recent Trends and Other Developments

(Comparisons are made to the comparable period(s) in 2009 unless otherwise indicated)

—

Professional liability policyholders, excluding policyholders under alternative risk arrangements, increased 29 percent to 18,111 policyholders as of June 30, 2010, compared to 13,999 policyholders as of June 30, 2009. This increase in policyholders primarily resulted from the acquisition of Advocate, MD, which closed in November 2009. Excluding Advocate, MD, professional liability policyholders increased 2 percent.

Form 10-Q: 37

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

—	Our national policyholder retention was 96 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to 95 percent for the comparable period in 2009. Excluding Advocate, MD, national policyholder retention was 97 percent. Our Florida policyholder retention was 97 percent and 96 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
—	Net premiums written for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010 increased 20 percent and 13 percent, respectively, primarily as a result of the acquisition of Advocate, MD. Excluding Advocate, MD, net premiums written increased 4 percent for the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 primarily as a result of an increase in professional liability policyholders. Net premiums written were level for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 primarily due to an increase in professional liability policyholders offset to some extent by lower premium rates in our Florida market arising from lower claims frequency and improved overall loss costs.
—	Consolidated revenues were 7 percent higher for both the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same periods in 2009. Excluding Advocate, MD, consolidated revenues were 8 percent lower for both the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010 primarily as the result of lower net premiums earned, as well as lower net investment income.
—	Net investment income was 12 percent and 10 percent lower for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, primarily as the result of lower yields on fixed income securities and cash and cash equivalents.
—	As a result of the continuation of favorable overall claim results as compared to previous estimates, we recognized favorable net loss development related to previously established reserves of $5.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 and $9.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. Our current accident year loss ratio for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010 was 71.9 percent and 71.0 percent, respectively, compared to 71.0 percent and 70.9 percent for the same periods in 2009.
—	Our expense ratio was 29.2 percent and 28.6 percent for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, compared to 26.2 percent and 24.9 percent for the same periods in 2009. The higher ratios in 2010 were primarily due to lower recoveries on previous insurance guaranty fund assessments, the amortization of intangibles related to the acquisition of Advocate, MD, and the write down of a receivable deemed uncollectible. Additionally, there were lower than normal employee benefit costs during the first six months of 2009.
—	Book value per common share grew 7 percent to $29.55 as of June 30, 2010 from $27.58 as of December 31, 2009. As of June 30, 2010, the statutory surplus of our insurance subsidiaries was $261.1 million and the ratio of net premiums written to surplus was 0.6 to 1.

Form 10-Q: 38

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

—	On a trade date basis, we repurchased 369,579 shares of our common stock during the three months ended June 30, 2010 at an average price of $27.25 per share and as of June 30, 2010, had remaining authority from our Board of Directors to repurchase 481,762 more shares under our stock repurchase program. Through July 30, 2010, we repurchased an additional 119,265 shares of our common stock, on a trade date basis, at an average price of $28.01 per share, and had remaining authority from our Board of Directors to repurchase an additional 362,497 shares as of that date.
—	On June 1, 2010, Fitch Ratings affirmed the A- (Strong) insurer financial strength rating and stable outlook of our insurance subsidiaries.

Results of Operations: Three Months and Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 compared to Three Months and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009

Our business is comprised of our insurance operations, which operate through our insurance subsidiaries domiciled in Florida, Missouri and Texas. Financial and selected other data, including professional liability claims data, related to our operations is summarized in the table below. For comparative purposes and to provide additional information to our investors, data with regard to written premiums, policyholders and claims has been broken out between FPIC pre-acquisition business and Advocate, MD. FPIC pre-acquisition business represents our insurance operations conducted through insurance subsidiaries domiciled in Florida and Missouri. These operations do not include the operations of Advocate, MD, which was acquired in November 2009.

Net income decreased 18 percent to $7.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010, or $0.76 per diluted common share, compared to $9.2 million, or $0.81 per diluted common share, for the three months ended June 30, 2009. Net income decreased 16 percent to $14.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, or $1.46 per diluted common share, compared to $17.6 million, or $1.53 per diluted common share, for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The decline in net income for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010 is primarily due to lower net investment income, a higher combined ratio in the current year and the inclusion of amortization recorded on intangible assets acquired in connection with the acquisition of Advocate, MD.

Form 10-Q: 39

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

Information concerning written premiums and policyholders is summarized in the following tables:

(in thousands)	For the three months ended June 30, 2010
	FPIC pre-acquisition business			Advocate, MD			Consolidated			For the three months ended June 30, 2009			Percentage Change 2010 vs 2009
Direct premiums written (1)	$	37,297			5,773			43,070			36,506			18	%
Assumed premiums written		176			—			176			—			0	%
Ceded premiums written		(4,931	)		(702	)		(5,633	)		(5,131	)		-10	%
Net premiums written	$	32,542			5,071			37,613			31,375			20	%


(in thousands)	For the six months ended June 30, 2010
	FPIC pre-acquisition business			Advocate, MD			Consolidated			For the six months ended June 30, 2009			Percentage Change 2010 vs 2009
Direct premiums written (1)	$	81,596			10,591			92,187			82,110			12	%
Assumed premiums written		176			—			176			—			0	%
Ceded premiums written		(11,109	)		(1,394	)		(12,503	)		(11,476	)		-9	%
Net premiums written	$	70,663			9,197			79,860			70,634			13	%


(1)	Includes $0.6 million and $1.7 million of premiums associated with alternative risk arrangements for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, compared to $0.5 million and $2.0 million of premiums for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. Management fees for such arrangements are included in other income.

	As of June 30, 2010
	FPIC pre-acquisition business		Advocate, MD		Consolidated		As of June 30, 2009		Percentage Change 2010 vs 2009
Professional liability policyholders		14,261		3,850		18,111		13,999		29	%
Professional liability policyholders under alternative risk arrangements		212		—		212		227		-7	%
Total professional liability policyholders		14,473		3,850		18,323		14,226		29	%

Form 10-Q: 40

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

Direct premiums written increased 18 percent and 12 percent for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2009, primarily as a result of the acquisition of Advocate, MD. Excluding Advocate, MD, direct premiums written increased 3 percent for the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 primarily as a result of an increase in professional liability policyholders. Direct premiums written were level for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 primarily as a result of an increase in professional liability policyholders offset to some extent by lower premium rates in our Florida market arising from lower claims frequency and improved overall loss costs. Our national policyholder retention was 96 percent as of June 30, 2010 compared to 95 percent for the comparable period in 2009. Excluding Advocate, MD, national policyholder retention was 97 percent as of June 30, 2010. Our Florida policyholder retention was 97 percent as of June 30, 2010 compared to 96 percent as of June 30, 2009.

Net premiums written increased 20 percent and 13 percent for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2009, primarily as a result of the acquisition of Advocate, MD. Excluding Advocate, MD, net premiums written increased 4 percent for the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 primarily as a result of an increase in professional liability policyholders. Net premiums written were flat for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 as a result of the same drivers discussed above with regards to direct premiums written for the six months ended June 30, 2010.

Net premiums earned increased 11 percent and 10 percent for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2009, primarily as a result of the acquisition of Advocate, MD. Excluding Advocate, MD, net premiums earned decreased 6 percent for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010, primarily due to lower rates in our Florida market on policies previously written that are now being earned.

Net investment income declined 12 percent and 10 percent for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, primarily as a result of lower yields on fixed income securities and cash and cash equivalents.

Form 10-Q: 41

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

Information concerning our loss ratio, underwriting expense ratio and combined ratio is summarized in the following table.

		For the three months ended June 30,						For the six months ended June 30,
		2010			2009			2010			2009
Loss ratio
Current accident year			71.9	%		71.0	%		71.0	%		70.9	%
Prior accident years			-11.9	%		-13.3	%		-10.7	%		-11.8	%
Calendar year loss ratio	A		60.0	%		57.7	%		60.3	%		59.1	%

Underwriting expense ratio	B		29.2	%		26.2	%		28.6	%		24.9	%
Insurance guaranty fund recoveries			-0.1	%		-0.9	%		-0.2	%		-1.0	%
Underwriting expense ratio excluding insurance guaranty fund assessments (recoveries)	C		29.3	%		27.1	%		28.8	%		25.9	%

Combined ratio (Sum of A+B)			89.2	%		83.9	%		88.9	%		84.0	%

Combined ratio excluding insurance guaranty fund assessments (recoveries) (Sum of A+C)			89.3	%		84.8	%		89.1	%		85.0	%

Net losses and LAE increased 15 percent and 12 percent for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2009, primarily due to the acquisition of Advocate, MD. As a result of the continuation of favorable overall claim results as compared to our previous estimates, we recognized favorable net loss development related to previously established reserves of $5.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 and $9.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. Our current accident year loss ratio has remained relatively stable for the six months ended June 30, 2010 at 71.0 percent compared to 70.9 percent for the same period in 2009. The favorable development recognized in 2010 reflects lower than expected ultimate losses primarily for the 2005 through 2007 accident years as a result of reductions in our estimates of incident to claim development, payment frequency and payment severity for those accident years as compared to previous estimates.

Other underwriting expenses increased 24 percent and 26 percent for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, primarily as a result of the acquisition of Advocate, MD. Excluding Advocate, MD, other underwriting expenses increased 5 percent and 7 percent for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, primarily due to lower recoveries on previous insurance guaranty fund assessments and the write down of a receivable deemed uncollectible. Additionally, there were lower than normal employee benefit costs during the first six months of 2009.

Form 10-Q: 42

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

Selected information concerning our direct professional liability insurance claim data is summarized in the following tables.

(in thousands)	For the six months ended June 30, 2010
	FPIC pre-acquisition business		Advocate, MD		Consolidated		For the six months ended June 30, 2009		Percentage Change 2010 vs 2009
Net paid losses	$	48,339		2,537		50,876		33,512		52	%
Less: net paid losses on assumed business in run-off and commuted reinsurance agreements		175		—		175		501		-65	%
Net paid losses excluding assumed business in run-off and commuted reinsurance agreements		48,164		2,537		50,701		33,011		54	%

Net paid LAE		19,999		2,936		22,935		21,931		5	%
Less: net paid LAE on assumed business in run-off and commuted reinsurance agreements		—		—		—		—		—
Net paid LAE excluding assumed business in run-off and commuted reinsurance agreements		19,999		2,936		22,935		21,931		5	%

Net paid losses and LAE excluding assumed business in run-off and commuted reinsurance agreements	$	68,163		5,473		73,636		54,942		34	%

Form 10-Q: 43

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

	For the six months ended June 30, 2010
	FPIC pre-acquisition business			Advocate, MD			Consolidated			For the six months ended June 30, 2009			Percentage Change 2010 vs 2009
Total professional liability claims closed without indemnity payment		285			77			362			292			24	%
Total professional liability incidents closed without indemnity payment		309			68			377			350			8	%
Total professional liability claims and incidents closed without indemnity payment		594			145			739			642			15	%

Total Professional Liability Claims with Indemnity Payment		164			21			185			169			9	%

CWIP Ratio on a rolling four quarter basis(1)		38	%		24	%		36	%		37	%

CWIP Ratio, including incidents, on a rolling four quarter basis (1)		20	%		15	%		19	%		18	%


(1)	The claims with indemnity payment (“CWIP”) ratio is defined as the ratio of total professional liability claims with indemnity payment to the sum of total professional liability claims with indemnity payment and total professional liability claims closed without indemnity payment.

Form 10-Q: 44

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

	For the six months ended June 30, 2010
	FPIC pre-acquisition business		Advocate, MD		Consolidated		For the six months ended June 30, 2009		Percentage Change 2010 vs 2009
Total professional liability claims reported during the period		442		122		564		388		45	%
Total professional liability incidents reported during the period		436		51		487		485		0	%
Total professional liability claims and incidents reported during the period		878		173		1,051		873		20	%

Total professional liability claims and incidents that remained open		3,400		364		3,764		3,423		10	%

Form 10-Q: 45

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

Selected professional liability insurance claims data. Net paid losses and LAE, excluding assumed business in run-off and commuted reinsurance contracts, increased for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared with the same period in 2009 as a result of the acquisition of Advocate, MD and the resolution of two related claims from accident year 2002 against an insured. The amount paid in excess of the applicable policy limit and reinsurance was $10 million for each such claim. Such amounts had been fully contemplated in previously established loss and LAE reserves. Excluding these payments, net paid losses and LAE for FPIC pre-acquisition business declined 12 percent. On a rolling four quarter basis ended June 30, 2010, the CWIP ratio was 36 percent and the CWIP ratio, including incidents, was 19 percent, compared to 37 percent and 18 percent, respectively, for the same period ended in 2009. The CWIP ratios remain within our expectations. Excluding claims and incidents reported at Advocate, MD, total professional liability claims and incidents reported during the period were relatively level with the prior period. When adjusted to reflect the composition of our book of business, frequency was essentially level with 2009. Our inventory of open claims and incidents increased due to the acquisition of Advocate, MD and inclusion of its open claims and incidents. Excluding the open claims and incidents of Advocate, MD, professional liability claims and incidents that remained open declined 1 percent. It is not unusual for our claims data to fluctuate from period to period, and our claims data remains within our expectations.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity is a measure of a company’s ability to generate cash flows sufficient to meet short-term and long-term cash requirements of its business operations. As a holding company, our assets consist primarily of the stock of our subsidiaries and of other investments. The sources of liquidity available to us for the payment of operating expenses, taxes, debt-related amounts and other needs include management fees and dividends from our insurance subsidiaries. Management fees from our insurance subsidiaries are based on agreements in place with First Professionals and Anesthesiologists Professional Assurance Company, pursuant to which we provide for them substantially all management and administrative services. In accordance with limitations imposed by Florida law, our insurance subsidiaries are permitted to pay us dividends of approximately $27.3 million during 2010 without prior regulatory approval. We have received $20.0 million in dividends through June 30, 2010 and another $6.9 million on July 15, 2010 in furtherance of our capital management initiatives. As of June 30, 2010, the holding company held cash and liquid investments of $15.1 million.

For additional information concerning our liquidity and financial resources, see Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Sources of liquidity include cash from operations, sales of investments and financing arrangements. As reported in the consolidated statement of cash flows, net cash used in operating activities was $8.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $6.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The decline in net cash provided by operating activities is primarily due to higher loss and LAE payments as noted above and lower premium receipts during the six months ended June 30, 2010 partially offset by lower tax payments in the current year.

Form 10-Q: 46

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

Net cash provided by investing activities was $35.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to $23.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. Net cash provided by investing activities increased during 2010 primarily as a result of transactions involving securities, which are dependent on our cash flows from operating activities and the management of our investment portfolio. We had higher proceeds from sales and maturities of investments for the first six months of 2010 compared to the comparable period in 2009.

Net cash used in financing activities was $17.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to $22.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The decrease in net cash used in financing activities for 2010 is primarily due to lower share repurchases under our stock repurchase program.

As of June 30, 2010, we had cash and investments of $735.5 million. Included within cash and investments were cash and cash equivalents of $68.6 million and fixed income securities, available-for-sale, with a fair value of approximately $76.6 million with scheduled maturities during the next 12 months.

We believe that our cash and investments as of June 30, 2010, combined with expected cash flows from operating activities and the scheduled maturities of investments, will be sufficient to meet our cash needs for operating purposes for at least the next 12 months.

Capital Resources

Capital resources consist of funds deployed or available to be deployed to support our business operations. We believe our financial strength generally provides us with the flexibility and capacity to obtain funds externally through debt or equity financing on both a short-term and long-term basis. Our ability to access the capital markets, however, is dependent on, among other things, market conditions. The following table summarizes the components of our capital structure as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.

(in thousands)	As of			As of
	June 30, 2010		December 31, 2009
Long-term debt	$	46,083			46,083
Shareholders' equity	$	283,667			279,787
Ratio of debt to total capitalization		14.0%			14.1%

Long-Term Debt

During 2003, we completed the placement of $10.0 million in senior notes and created three trusts that issued 30-year trust-preferred securities for which the proceeds from such issuances together with cash previously contributed to the trusts were used to purchase junior subordinated debentures from FPIC totaling $36.1 million. The debentures that we issued, which are reported as long-term debt in the consolidated statements of financial position, to the three trusts are subordinated to all senior indebtedness, including the senior notes, and are equal in standing with one another. We have not consolidated these subsidiary trusts in accordance with the guidance on the consolidation of variable interest entities.

Form 10-Q: 47

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

These debt securities are uncollateralized and bear floating interest equal to the three-month LIBOR plus spreads ranging from 3.85 percent to 4.20 percent (actual interest rates ranged from 4.18 percent to 4.74 percent as of June 30, 2010). We have the option to redeem the senior notes and trust-preferred securities on any quarterly interest payment date, in whole or in part, without premium or penalty. However, if we elected to redeem our long-term indebtedness, we would be required to unwind our interest rate swaps and any related gains or losses remaining in other comprehensive income would be fully recorded in interest expense during the period. The trust-preferred securities also contain features that allow us the option, under certain conditions, to defer interest payments for up to 20 quarters. The senior notes and trust preferred securities have stated maturities of 30 years and are due in May and October 2033.

Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have various contractual obligations that are recorded as liabilities in our consolidated financial statements and other items that represent contractual obligations, commitments and contingent liabilities that are not recorded or that are considered to possess off-balance sheet risks beyond their respective amounts otherwise reflected in our consolidated financial statements. These include: (1) derivative financial instruments, which are used to hedge interest rate risk; (2) guarantees by us and contractual obligations related to the trust-preferred securities issued by separately created, unconsolidated trusts; (3) employee benefit plans; and (4) contingent consideration related to the acquisition of Advocate, MD. We were not a party to any unconsolidated arrangement or financial instrument with special purpose entities or other vehicles as of June 30, 2010 that would give rise to previously undisclosed market, credit or financing risk. No significant changes have occurred to our contractual obligations, commitments and off-balance sheet arrangements as described in the applicable section of our MD&A included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market and economic conditions and is directly influenced by the volatility and liquidity in the markets in which the related underlying assets are traded. We have exposure to three principal types of market risk: interest rate risk, credit risk and equity price risk. Our market risk sensitive instruments are acquired for purposes other than trading. There have been no material changes in the reported market risks, as described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, except as noted below:

Credit risk – fixed income securities and reinsurance. Credit risk is the risk that issuers of securities owned by us will default, or other parties, primarily our insureds and reinsurers that owe us money, will not pay. Financial instruments that potentially expose us to concentrations of credit risk consist of fixed income investments, premiums receivable, deposits with reinsurers, and assets carried for reinsurance recoverables related to unpaid losses and LAE and unearned premiums. Reinsurers that are neither authorized nor accredited by applicable state insurance departments (“unauthorized reinsurers”) are required to provide collateral in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit or investment securities held in a trust account to collateralize their respective balances due to us.

Form 10-Q: 48

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

As of June 30, 2010, our fixed income portfolio had an overall average credit quality of AA-, based on the lower of the available credit ratings from Moody’s Investment Services (“Moody’s”) or Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) for each investment security in our portfolio. We maintain a diversified portfolio and primarily invest in securities with investment grade credit ratings, with the intent to minimize credit risks. As of June 30, 2010, approximately 35 percent of our fixed income securities consist of tax-exempt securities. The balance is diversified through investments in treasury, agency, corporate, mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities.

As of June 30, 2010 over 98 percent of our fixed income securities were rated by at least S&P or Moody’s. Certain of these securities contain credit enhancements in the form of a third-party guarantee from a financial guarantor. In most cases, the underlying issuer of the fixed-income security has a credit rating from one of the above rating agencies. The following table shows the rating of each of the securities containing such credit enhancements “with” and “without” the impact of the financial guarantor rating.

(in thousands)	Underlying Credit Rating
	AAA - A		BBB		Below BBB		Not Rated		Total
Value of Fixed-Income Securities based on the Credit Rating of the Financial Guarantor (1)	$	78,275		5,631		127		1,162	$	85,195
Value of Fixed-Income Securities based on the Credit Rating of the Underlying Issuer (2)	$	72,214		2,337		5,593		5,051	$	85,195


(1)	The ratings noted above were determined by using the lower of the available credit ratings from S&P or Moody’s unless the underlying issuer’s stand-alone credit rating was higher than the S&P or Moody’s stated rating, in which case the underlying issuer’s stand-alone credit rating was used.
(2)	The ratings noted above were determined by using the lower of the available credit ratings from S&P or Moody’s.

As of June 30, 2010, we had the following concentration in indirect exposures to financial guarantors through the ownership of fixed-income securities that contain a third-party guarantee.

(in thousands)	Value of Fixed-Income Securities Containing a Third-Party Guarantee
Financial Guarantor:	Securities with an Underlying Issuer Stand-Alone Credit Rating		Securities without an Underlying Issuer Stand-Alone Credit Rating		Total Securities Containing a Third-Party Guarantee from a Financial Guarantor
National Public Finance Guarantee Corporation	$	40,614		3,640		44,254
Assured Guaranty		18,336		—		18,336
Permanent School Fund		10,995		—		10,995
American Municipal Bond Assurance Corporation		5,678		1,039		6,717
Financial Guaranty Insurance Company		4,277		226		4,503
Other guarantors		244		146		390
Total	$	80,144		5,051		85,195

We do not hold any direct exposures to a financial guarantor in our investment portfolio.

Form 10-Q: 49

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

An evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined by Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), was completed as of June 30, 2010 by our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Based on such evaluation, FPIC’s disclosure controls and procedures were found to be effective at a reasonable assurance level. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives, and management necessarily is required to use its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

During the second quarter of 2010, we began the design and implementation of internal controls over financial reporting for our recently acquired subsidiary, Advocate, MD. There have been no other changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second quarter of 2010 and that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Part II

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

Form 10-Q: 50

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

For additional information concerning our commitments and contingencies, see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations as well as Note 12, Commitments and Contingencies to this Form 10-Q.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

There have been no changes to our risk factors as disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

There were no unregistered sales of equity securities during the second quarter of 2010.

Stock Repurchase Plan − Under our stock repurchase program, we may repurchase shares up to the amounts available for repurchase at such times, and in such amounts, as management deems appropriate. Under certain circumstances, limitations may be placed on our ability to repurchase our stock by the terms of agreements relating to our junior subordinated debentures. For information regarding these limitations, see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 10 Long-Term Debt, as well as the discussion under the heading “Liquidity and Capital Resources” in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Form 10-Q: 51

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

The following table summarizes our common stock repurchases on a trade date basis for the three months ended June 30, 2010:

Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (1)		Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs at End of Month (1)
April 1 - 30, 2010
Repurchase programs (1)		124,700	$	27.13		124,700		726,641
Employee transactions (2)		5,515	$	26.65		n/a		n/a

May 1 - 31, 2010
Repurchase programs (1)		115,906	$	27.42		115,906		610,735
Employee transactions (2)		—	$	—		n/a		n/a

June 1- 30, 2010
Repurchase programs (1)		128,973	$	27.21		128,973		481,762
Employee transactions (2)		389	$	26.10		n/a		n/a

Total		375,483	$	27.24		369,579		481,762


(1)	Our Board of Directors approved our share repurchase program in July 2006. This program authorizes us to repurchase shares through open-market transactions, or in block transactions, or private transactions, pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 trading plans, or otherwise. This program expires on December 31, 2010.
(2)	Represents shares of our common stock delivered to us in satisfaction of the tax withholding obligation of holders of restricted shares that vested during the quarter and the exercise cost of stock options.

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable

Item 4.

[Removed and Reserved]

Item 5.

Other Information

All matters requiring a Form 8-K filing have been so filed as of the date of this filing. There have been no material changes to the procedures by which security holders recommend nominees to the board of directors.

Form 10-Q: 52

FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

Item 6.

Exhibits

Exhibit	Description
31.1	Certification of John R. Byers, President and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	Certification of Charles Divita, III, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32	Certification of John R. Byers, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Charles Divita, III, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

August 4, 2010	FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

	By:	/s/ Charles Divita, III
		Charles Divita, III Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Form 10-Q: 53

Exhibit Index to Form 10-Q

For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2010

Exhibit	Description
31.1	Certification of John R. Byers, President and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	Certification of Charles Divita, III, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32	Certification of John R. Byers, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Charles Divita, III, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002