UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.     )

Filed by the Registrant ☒    Filed by a party other than the Registrant ☐

Check the appropriate box:

Enova International, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

175 West Jackson Blvd.

Chicago, Illinois 60604

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD May 8, 2018

The 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (Annual Meeting) of Enova International, Inc. (we, us, our or the Company) will be held at 175 West Jackson Blvd., Chicago, Illinois 60604 on the 22nd floor, on Tuesday, May 8, 2018 at 9:30 a.m., Central Time, to vote on the following matters:

and to transact any other business that may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any reconvened meeting following any adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting.

The accompanying proxy statement provides information about the matters you will be asked to consider and vote on at the Annual Meeting.

Our Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on March 15, 2018 as the record date for determining holders of record (Stockholders) of our common stock, par value $0.00001 per share (Common Stock), entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting or any reconvened meeting following any adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting. We are pleased to take advantage of Securities and Exchange Commission rules that allow us to furnish our proxy materials on the Internet. As a result, we are mailing a notice to our Stockholders instead of a printed copy of the proxy statement and our 2017 annual report to stockholders. The notice provides instructions on how to access those materials on the Internet and how to obtain printed copies.

You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, our Board of Directors asks that you vote as soon as possible. You may vote by proxy on the Internet, via toll-free telephone number or, if you received a proxy card by mail, you may sign, date and mail the proxy card in the envelope provided. Your vote is important and all Stockholders are encouraged to attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person or by proxy.

Thank you for your support and continued interest in our Company.

By Order of the Board of Directors:

David Fisher

Chief Executive Officer

Chicago, Illinois

March 29, 2018

ENOVA INTERNATIONAL, INC.

2018 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

175 West Jackson Blvd.

Chicago, Illinois 60604

PROXY STATEMENT

FOR

2018 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

General Information

We are furnishing this proxy statement to you in connection with the solicitation of proxies by our Board of Directors (Board) for use at our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (Annual Meeting), to be held at 175 West Jackson Blvd., Chicago, Illinois 60604 on the 22nd floor, at 9:30 a.m., Central Time, on Tuesday, May 8, 2018, and at any reconvened meeting following any adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting. Our telephone number is (312) 568-4200, and our mailing address is 175 West Jackson Blvd., Suite 1000, Chicago, Illinois 60604. Our website address is www.enova.com. Information on our website is not a part of this proxy statement. When used in this proxy statement, the terms we, us, our, the Company or Enova refer to Enova International, Inc. and, unless the context requires otherwise, its subsidiaries.

On or before March 29, 2018, we began mailing a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (Notice) to the record holders of our Common Stock.

The Company’s annual report to stockholders (Annual Report) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, which includes the Company’s fiscal 2017 audited consolidated financial statements, accompanies this proxy statement. Although the Annual Report is being distributed with this proxy statement, it does not constitute a part of the proxy solicitation materials and is not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement.

1

Questions and Answers

Why did I receive these materials?

These materials are being provided to you in connection with our Board’s solicitation of proxies for use at the Annual Meeting. As a Stockholder, you are invited to attend the Annual Meeting and to vote in person or by proxy on the proposals described in this proxy statement.

What is included in the proxy materials?

The proxy materials include:

Why did I receive a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials in the mail instead of a full set of printed proxy materials?

Pursuant to rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), we are making this proxy statement and our Annual Report available to Stockholders electronically on the Internet. On or before March 29, 2018, we began mailing the Notice to Stockholders of record as of the record date. Holders of our Common Stock will be able to access the proxy materials on the Internet at www.proxyvote.com or request printed copies of the proxy materials. Instructions on how to access the proxy materials on the Internet or request a printed copy are found in the Notice. We believe this electronic process will expedite your receipt of the proxy materials and reduce the cost and environmental impact of the Annual Meeting. We also encourage you to have all your accounts registered in the same name and address by contacting our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., at (800) 884‑4225 or at www.computershare.com/contactus.

What am I voting on?

Our Board is soliciting your vote for:

Proposal 1: the election of eight members of our Board named in this proxy statement for a one-year term to expire at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders;

Proposal 2: a non-binding proposal to approve the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement;

Proposal 3: ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our 2018 fiscal year; and

Proposal 4: to approve the Second Amended and Restated 2014 LTIP.

What are the Board’s recommendations?

Our Board recommends you vote:

2

How can I get electronic access to the proxy materials?

The Notice provides you with instructions on how to view the proxy materials for the Annual Meeting on the Internet. The website on which you can view our proxy materials will also allow you to elect to receive future proxy materials electronically by email, which will save us the cost of printing and mailing materials to you. If you choose to receive future proxy materials by email, you will receive an email next year with instructions and a link to the proxy voting site. Your election to receive proxy materials by email will remain in effect until you revoke it.

Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?

Stockholders of record as of the close of business on March 15, 2018 (record date) will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting or any reconvened meeting following any adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting.

How many votes do I have?

On the record date, there were 33,860,388 shares of Common Stock (exclusive of treasury shares) outstanding. Each Stockholder is entitled to one vote for each outstanding share of Common Stock held as of the record date.

We refer to the total number of votes represented by our outstanding Common Stock as our total voting power. As of the record date, our Stockholders held 100% of the total voting power entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

What is the difference between holding Common Stock as a holder of record and as a beneficial owner?

What is the quorum required for the Annual Meeting?

A majority of our voting power outstanding on the record date must be present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting to hold the Annual Meeting and conduct business. This is called a quorum. Your Common Stock will be counted for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum (whether representing votes for, against, withheld or abstained, or broker non-votes) if you:

If I am a Stockholder of record, how do I vote?

There are four ways to vote:

3

If you are voting on the Internet, by telephone or by returning an executed proxy card, your vote or proxy card must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on May 7, 2018 to be counted.

If I am a beneficial owner of Common Stock held in street name, how do I vote?

There are four ways to vote:

If you are voting on the Internet, by telephone or by returning an executed voting instruction form, your vote or voting instruction form must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on May 7, 2018 to be counted.

What happens if I do not give specific voting instructions?

Which proposals are considered routine or non-routine?

Proposal 3 (ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP) is a proposal we believe is routine.

Proposal 1 (election of directors), Proposal 2 (non-binding advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation) and Proposal 4 (approval of the Second Amended and Restated 2014 LTIP) are proposals we believe are non-routine.

4

What happens if other business is transacted at the Annual Meeting?

Management does not know of any business to be transacted at the Annual Meeting other than the matters described in this proxy statement. However, if any other matters do properly come before the Annual Meeting, it is intended that the shares represented by the proxies in the accompanying form will be voted by the proxy holders as recommended by the Board or, if no recommendation is given, in accordance with the best judgment of the person voting the proxies.

What vote is required to approve each proposal?

The following table describes the voting requirement for each proposal:

What happens if a director does not receive a majority of the votes cast?

If a director does not receive a majority of the votes cast, he or she is required to promptly tender a resignation to the Board after the certification of the election results. The Board then determines, in accordance with procedures established by the Board, or a committee designated by the Board, whether to accept or reject the resignation or take any other action within 90 days from the date of the certification of the election results. If such director’s resignation is not accepted by the Board, such director shall continue to serve until the next annual meeting or until his or her successor is duly elected or his or her earlier resignation or removal. If a director’s resignation is accepted by the Board, then the Board, in its sole discretion, may fill any resulting vacancy or may decrease the size of the Board.

5

What is the effect of the advisory vote?

As an advisory vote, Proposal 2 is not binding on our Board or Management Development and Compensation Committee (Compensation Committee) and the final decision on the matter covered by Proposal 2 remains with them. However, we value your opinion on this important issue. Our Compensation Committee appreciates support for its compensation philosophy and will consider the results of the advisory vote on Proposal 2 when making future executive compensation decisions.

Can I change my vote after I have voted?

You may revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time before your vote is due, which deadline includes the final vote at the Annual Meeting if you have the right to vote in person. You may vote again on a later date on the Internet or by telephone (only your latest Internet or telephone proxy submitted prior to the applicable deadline will be counted), by signing and returning a new proxy card or voting instruction form with a later date, or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person if you have the right to vote in person. Mere attendance at the Annual Meeting will not automatically revoke your proxy unless you vote in person at the Annual Meeting or specifically request in writing that your prior proxy be revoked.

How will my proxy be voted?

Common Stock represented by a properly executed proxy (in paper form, by internet or telephone) that is received in a timely manner, and not subsequently revoked, will be voted at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof in the manner directed on the proxy. David Fisher and Lisa M. Young are named as proxies in the proxy form and have been designated by the Board as the directors’ proxies to represent you and vote your Common Stock at the Annual Meeting. All Common Stock represented by a properly executed proxy on which no choice is specified will be voted:

Is my vote confidential?

We will handle proxy instructions, ballots and voting tabulations that identify individual Stockholders in a manner that protects your voting privacy. Your vote will not be disclosed within or outside our Company, except:

Occasionally, Stockholders provide written comments on their proxy cards. These may be forwarded to management or our Board.

Where can I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting?

The preliminary voting results may be announced at the Annual Meeting and will be promptly announced after the Annual Meeting. The final voting results will be tallied by the Inspector of Election for the Annual Meeting and announced in a current report on Form 8-K or quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC within four business days after the final voting results are known.

6

Who is paying the cost of this proxy solicitation?

We are paying the cost of soliciting proxies. We have retained Morrow Sodali, LLC to assist in soliciting proxies for a fee of $6,000, with an additional nominal cost to solicit certain holders, plus reasonable out-of-pocket expenses. We must pay brokerage firms and other persons representing beneficial owners of Common Stock their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners who specifically request them and obtaining voting instructions from those beneficial owners.

In addition to soliciting proxies by mail, members of our Board and our officers and employees may solicit proxies on our behalf, without additional compensation, personally or by telephone. We may also solicit proxies by email from Stockholders who are our employees or who have previously requested electronic receipt of proxy materials.

Do I have dissenters’ rights of appraisal?

The Delaware General Corporation Law does not provide dissenters’ rights of appraisal to the Stockholders in connection with any proposal described in this proxy statement.

Who can help answer my questions?

If you have questions concerning a proposal or the Annual Meeting, if you would like additional copies of this proxy statement, or if you need directions to or special assistance at the Annual Meeting, please contact our Secretary, Lisa M. Young, at (312) 568-4200 or by mail at 175 West Jackson Blvd., Suite 1000, Chicago, Illinois 60604. In addition, information regarding the Annual Meeting is available via the internet at the website www.proxyvote.com.

7

Stockholder Proposals and Communications with our Board

Proposals

Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), provides that we must receive stockholders’ proposals intended for presentation at the 2019 annual meeting of our stockholders (2019 Annual Meeting) by December 7, 2018 to be eligible for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement for the 2019 Annual Meeting. For other business (other than director nominations) to be properly brought before a stockholder meeting by a stockholder, the stockholder must have given timely notice thereof in writing to our Secretary and such business must otherwise be a proper matter for stockholder action. To be timely, a stockholder’s notice relating to business proposed to be conducted at the 2019 Annual Meeting shall be delivered to or mailed and received at the principal executive offices of the Company not less than seventy (70) days nor more than one hundred (100) days prior to the first anniversary of the 2018 Annual Meeting. In the event that the date of the 2019 Annual Meeting is advanced more than thirty (30) days prior to such anniversary date or delayed more than sixty (60) days after such anniversary date then to be timely such notice must be received by the Company on or before the later of (i) seventy (70) days prior to the date of the meeting or (ii) the tenth (10th) day following the day on which public announcement of the date of the meeting was made.

Director Nominations

Stockholders who wish to nominate qualified candidates for election to our Board may notify our Secretary in accordance with our Bylaws at Enova International, Inc., 175 West Jackson Blvd., Chicago, Illinois 60604. Each Stockholder nomination must provide the information relating to the candidate that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act (including such proposed candidate’s written consent to being named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serving as a director if elected) and the information relating to the stockholder in accordance with the nomination notice provisions of our Bylaws.

To be timely, a stockholder’s notice relating to nominations to be made at the 2019 Annual Meeting shall be delivered to or mailed and received at the principal executive offices of the Company not less than seventy (70) days nor more than one hundred (100) days prior to the first anniversary of the 2018 Annual Meeting. In the event that the date of the 2019 Annual Meeting is advanced more than thirty (30) days prior to such anniversary date or delayed more than sixty (60) days after such anniversary date then to be timely such notice must be received by the Company on or before the later of (i) seventy (70) days prior to the date of the meeting or (ii) the tenth (10th) day following the day on which public announcement of the date of the meeting was made.

Communication with the Board

We encourage any Stockholder or any other interested party who desires to communicate with our Board about the holder’s views and concerns to do so by writing our Secretary at Enova International, Inc., 175 West Jackson Blvd., Suite 1000, Chicago, Illinois 60604. Our Secretary will ensure that the chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receives your correspondence.

Householding of Proxy Materials

Some brokers, banks and other nominee record holders may participate in the practice of householding stockholder materials, such as proxy statements, information statements and annual reports. This means only one copy of the proxy materials may have been sent to multiple Stockholders in your household. To obtain a separate copy of the proxy materials, contact our Secretary, Lisa M. Young, at (312) 568-4200 or by mail at 175 West Jackson Blvd., Suite 1000, Chicago, Illinois 60604. If you wish to receive separate copies of proxy materials in the future, or if you are receiving multiple copies and would like to receive a single copy for your household, you should contact your broker, bank or other nominee record holder, or, if you are a record holder of our Common Stock, you may contact Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc. (Broadridge) either by calling toll-free at (800) 542‑1061, or by writing Broadridge, Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York 11717.

8

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers, and beneficial owners of more than ten percent of our Common Stock to file with the SEC reports of their initial ownership and changes in their ownership of our Common Stock and other equity securities. SEC regulations require us to identify anyone who filed a required report late during the most recent fiscal year. Based on our review of these reports, we believe that for the year ended December 31, 2017 all reports required to be made by our reporting persons were timely filed in accordance with the Exchange Act, except that Mr. Fisher, Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Zeeman, Mr. Chartier and Ms. Young each filed one late Form 4 reporting a grant of restricted stock and stock options, and Mr. Fisher, Mr. Chartier and Ms. Young each filed one late Form 4 reporting the vesting of restricted stock and stock options.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

Securities Owned by Officers and Directors

The following table sets forth information about the beneficial ownership of our outstanding Common Stock as of March 15, 2018 by our directors, our named executive officers (NEOs) whose compensation is disclosed in “Executive Compensation” of this proxy statement and all of our directors and executive officers as a group. The ownership percentage is based on the number of shares of our Common Stock issued and outstanding on March 15, 2018, which was 33,860,388.

All of the NEOs, executive officers and directors have sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares of Common Stock reported below. None of the shares reported below are pledged as security or have been placed in a margin account by any executive officer or director.

9

Securities Owned by Principal Stockholders

The following table sets forth information regarding the number and percentage of shares of Common Stock held by all persons and entities known by us to beneficially own 5% or more of our outstanding Common Stock as of March 15, 2018. The information regarding beneficial ownership of Common Stock by the entity identified below is included in reliance on a report filed by the entity with the SEC, except that the percentage is based upon our calculations made in reliance upon the number of shares reported to be beneficially owned by the entity in such report and the number of shares of our Common Stock issued and outstanding on March 15, 2018, which was 33,860,388.

10

11

PROPOSAL 1 PROPOSAL TO ELECT DIRECTORS

Directors to be Elected by our Stockholders

At the Annual Meeting, our Stockholders will elect eight directors to hold office until the 2019 Annual Meeting and until their successors are elected and qualified or until their earlier death, incapacity, resignation or removal. Each director has served continuously since the date of his or her appointment. All nominees have consented to being named in this proxy statement and to serve if elected.

If any nominee should be unable or unwilling to stand for election as a director, it is intended that the Common Stock represented by proxies will be voted for the election of a substitute nominated by the Board.

12

13

14

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS YOU VOTE FOR ALL DIRECTOR NOMINEES

Structure and Functioning of the Board

Corporate Governance Philosophy

Our corporate governance philosophy is expressed in our Corporate Governance Guidelines; the charters of our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee; our Code of Business Conduct that applies to all of our employees, officers and directors, including our CEO, chief financial officer and those officers responsible for financial reporting; and our Related Party Transaction Policy, among others. Our committee charters, Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct, Insider Trading Policy, Regulation FD Policy and Stock Ownership Guidelines are available on the Corporate Governance page of our website at ir.enova.com.

15

We are committed to maintaining effective corporate governance guidelines designed to ensure that the Board is actively engaged in the proper performance of its oversight function.

Corporate Governance Structure and Function

Our articles of incorporation provide that the number of directors which shall constitute the entire Board shall be fixed by resolution adopted from time to time by the affirmative vote of the majority of the Board. Our Board consists of eight persons. It is the policy of the Company that the number of directors shall not exceed a number that can function efficiently as a body. Our directors are elected annually at each Annual Meeting by our Stockholders voting together as a single class.

We have a flexible governance structure in which our Board, assisted by its committees, directs our Company’s affairs.

Directors are encouraged to have direct dialogue with our management and internal audit manager and internal audit team and may request attendance by management, the internal audit manager and internal audit team, and our external auditors at Board and committee meetings.

We provide directors with materials such as our corporate governance documents, compensation plans, Company policies, Board and committee minutes, continuing education materials, and reports and presentations prepared by management, internal and external auditors and other advisors in advance of each meeting. Directors are encouraged to review these materials prior to the meeting.

The Company facilitates the continuing education of directors to assist them in maintaining currency with the Company’s business and operations.

Primary Responsibilities of the Board

As described in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Board’s primary functions are:

Director Independence

Our common stock is listed on the NYSE. Under the rules of the NYSE, independent directors must comprise a majority of our Board. In addition, the rules of the NYSE require that, subject to specified exceptions, each member of a listed company’s audit, compensation, and nominating and governance committees must be independent. Audit committee members must also satisfy the independence criteria set forth in Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act). Under the rules of the NYSE, a director will only qualify as an “independent director” if, in the opinion of that company’s Board of Directors, that person does not have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. In order to be considered independent for purposes of Rule 10A-3, a member of an audit committee of a listed company may not, other than in his or her capacity as a member of the audit committee,

16

the Board of Directors, or any other board committee: (1) accept, directly or indirectly, any consulting, advisory, or other compensatory fee from the listed company or any of its subsidiaries; or (2) be an affiliated person of the listed company or any of its subsidiaries. Each member of our Compensation Committee must also qualify as a “non-employee director” as defined in Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act and as an “outside director” as defined for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code (Section 162(m)).

Our Board has determined that none of Ms. Carnahan, Mr. Feehan, Mr. Goodyear, Mr. Gray, Mr. Kaplan, Mr. McGowan and Mr. Tebbe, representing seven (7) of our eight (8) directors, has a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and that each of these directors is “independent” as that term is defined under the rules of the NYSE. Our Board also determined that each of Mr. Goodyear (chair), Ms. Carnahan, Mr. Gray and Mr. McGowan, who comprise our audit committee, Mr. Feehan (chair), Mr. Kaplan and Mr. Tebbe, who comprise our Compensation Committee, and Mr. Gray (chair), Ms. Carnahan, Mr. Goodyear, Mr. Kaplan, Mr. McGowan and Mr. Tebbe, who comprise our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, satisfy the independence standards for those committees established by the rules of the NYSE and applicable SEC rules. In making these determinations, our Board considered the relationships that each non-employee director has with our company and all other facts and circumstances our Board deemed relevant in determining their independence, including the beneficial ownership of our capital stock by each non-employee director.

Board Diversity

Our Stockholders are better served when there is diversity of education, skill, age, experience, background, expertise and outlook on our Board. Our directors bring diverse backgrounds and experience to the Board that inform the Board’s oversight function. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines express the belief that diversity, including differences in background qualifications and personal characteristics, is important to our Board’s oversight function.

Director Meeting Attendance

Our Board held four meetings during 2017. Directors are expected to prepare for and make every effort to attend and participate in meetings of the Board and committees on which they serve. During 2017, each director attended at least 75% of those meetings.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that directors are expected to attend annual stockholder meetings in person or by telephone or other electronic means. All but one of our directors attended the annual stockholder meeting in 2017.

Executive Sessions of Independent Directors

Executive sessions or meetings of independent directors are held at least in conjunction with each regularly scheduled Board meeting to discuss such matters as the independent directors deem worthy of discussion. In addition to such executive sessions, the Board may also hold regular executive sessions of outside directors without management present. The presiding outside director shall serve as the presiding director at such meetings and shall perform such other functions as the Board may direct, including serving in a liaison capacity between the Board as a whole and the senior management of the Company. If there is no presiding outside director then designated or if the presiding outside director is not available, the Board shall select another outside director to serve as the presiding outside director until such time as the presiding outside director becomes available or is elected, as the case may be. Additional executive sessions or meetings of outside directors may be held from time to time as required. Executive sessions or meetings are held from time to time with our chief executive officer for a general discussion of relevant subjects.

17

Board and Committee Self-Assessment

To promote continuous improvement in our corporate governance processes, our Board and committees conduct an annual performance self-evaluation. The results are collected and analyzed and used to identify and implement improvements in our governance processes.

Board Committees

The chair of each committee handles the function of lead director for committee matters, serves as spokesperson for the committee, and provides recommendations and guidance to our Board, Board Chairman and management.

Each committee may retain its own legal and other advisors and conduct independent inquiries and investigations at our expense into matters under its oversight. Each committee has sole right to appoint and direct its own advisors, each of whom is accountable and reports directly to the committee.

Audit Committee

Our Audit Committee met seven times during 2017.

The Audit Committee was established in accordance with Exchange Act Section 3(a)(58)(A). Our Board has affirmatively determined that all members of the Audit Committee are independent directors, as defined by NYSE Rule 303A.02. Our Board has additionally determined that Mr. Goodyear, Ms. Carnahan, Mr. Gray and Mr. McGowan are audit committee financial experts, as defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K, and meet the financial sophistication requirement in NYSE Rule 303A.07. The Audit Committee’s functions are described in its charter, which is available on the Committee Charters page of our website at www.enova.com.

As described in its charter, the Audit Committee’s responsibilities include: reviewing and overseeing financial reporting and financial statements; reviewing, overseeing and maintaining independent auditor relationships; overseeing and maintaining internal audit and compliance procedures and requirements; and setting policies for the Company’s administrative policies and procedures.

Our independent auditor is accountable and reports directly to the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee reviews our independent auditor’s independence and the overall scope and focus of the annual audit. The Audit Committee discusses with our independent auditor any relationships or services that may affect its objectivity or independence. If the Audit Committee is not satisfied with the independent auditor’s assurances of independence, it will take, or recommend that the Board take, appropriate action to ensure its independence.

Compensation Committee

Our Compensation Committee met five times during 2017.

18

Our Board has affirmatively determined that all members of the Compensation Committee are independent directors, as defined by NYSE Rule 303A.02. Our Board has also affirmatively determined that Mr. Feehan, Mr. Kaplan and Mr. Tebbe meet the enhanced independence standards prescribed by Exchange Act Rule 10C-1(b)(1). The Compensation Committee members also qualify as non-employee directors under Exchange Act Rule 16b-3 and as outside directors under Section 162(m) of the Code. Our Compensation Committee’s functions are described in its charter, which is available on the Committee Charter page of our website at www.enova.com.

As described in its charter, the Compensation Committee’s responsibilities include: overseeing the Company’s overall compensation structure and practices, including providing guidance to management on significant issues affecting compensation philosophy or policy; reviewing and approving corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of the CEO and the Company’s other executive officers; setting the Company’s general policy regarding executive compensation; granting stock options, restricted stock and other discretionary awards under the Company’s stock option and other equity incentive plans; reviewing and making recommendations to the Board with respect to matters concerning the Company’s stock and cash-based incentive compensation plans; reviewing and discussing with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required to be included in the Company’s proxy statement for each annual meeting of stockholders or Form 10-K; overseeing and considering the results of the Company’s submissions to stockholders on matters relating to executive compensation including advisory votes on executive compensation and frequency of such votes; and reviewing with the CEO the functions of the CEO and other executive officers of the Company and the succession plans relating to these officers.

The Compensation Committee has primary responsibility for determining our compensation programs for executive officers and directors. In evaluating the level of executive officer and director compensation, the Compensation Committee takes into consideration advice from its independent consultant and recommendations from senior management. The Compensation Committee has sole authority to engage and compensate a compensation consultant and determine its independence from management. The compensation consultant is accountable and reports directly to the Compensation Committee.

Compensation Committee Interaction with Compensation Consultants

Since 2014, the Compensation Committee has engaged Towers Watson & Co., n/k/a Willis Towers Watson plc (Towers Watson), an executive compensation firm, to assist with its review of the compensation programs for our executive officers and the compensation disclosures in this proxy statement. The Compensation Committee intends to continue engaging Towers Watson in an advisory capacity with respect to executive compensation, including reviewing the compensation disclosures in this proxy statement. Although the Compensation Committee retains Towers Watson, Towers Watson interacts directly with our executive officers when necessary and appropriate. Towers Watson’s advisory services included providing industry and peer group compensation data and presenting compensation plan designs to the Compensation Committee for consideration. The Compensation Committee considered and assessed all factors specified under NYSE Listing Rules with respect to advisor independence and determined that Towers Watson is an independent executive compensation firm whose scope of work is limited to research and advisory services related to executive compensation, including reviewing the compensation disclosures in this proxy statement.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Our Nominating and Governance Committee met three times during 2017.

Our Board has affirmatively determined that all members of the Nominating and Governance Committee are independent directors, as defined by NYSE Rule 303A.02. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s functions are described in its charter, which is available on the Committee Charters page of our website at www.enova.com.

As described in its charter, the Nominating and Governance Committee’s responsibilities include: identifying, assessing and recommending Board candidates; developing the criteria for selecting Board candidates; recommending for approval to the Board director candidates; assisting the Board in assessing director independence; reviewing the structure and charters of Board committees and recommending to the Board, if desirable, changes in their number, responsibilities and membership; reviewing and approving related person transactions; providing

19

oversight of our Related Person Transaction Policy and our Insider Trading Policy; administering, reviewing and reassessing the adequacy of our Corporate Governance Guidelines and recommending any proposed changes to the Board; recommending other changes in corporate governance to the Board for approval from time to time; overseeing annual evaluations of the Board and its committees; and overseeing our enterprise risk management function.

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has the authority to consult with, retain and terminate, special legal counsel, search firms used to identify director candidates, or other consultants or advisors to advise the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee as circumstances may dictate. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also has the authority to approve the terms of engagement of, fees payable to, and any agreements with such outside advisors.

All of the eight Board nominees identified in this proxy statement are current directors. David C. Habiger, who became a director on October 1, 2014, resigned from the Board of Directors on December 21, 2017. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviewed the qualifications of each nominee and recommended each nominee for election to the Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will accept director nominations from Stockholders in accordance with the stockholder nominating procedures described in “Stockholder Proposals and Communications with our Board—Director Nominations.” The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter guides our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in considering candidates for director, including nominees submitted by Stockholders. Candidates for Board membership are to be selected for their character, judgement, business experience and acumen. Financial expertise, independence and familiarity with national and international issues affecting business are among the relevant criteria. In assessing potential new directors, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee should consider individuals from various disciplines and diverse backgrounds.

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews annually the appropriate skills and characteristics required of directors in light of the current makeup of our Board, the NYSE and SEC rules. Board candidates nominated by Stockholders must meet the criteria described in this proxy statement, but will otherwise be considered on the same basis as candidates nominated by the Board.

Board Leadership Structure

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the roles of Chairman of the Board (Chairman) and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) may be separated or combined, as the Board determines from time to time. Our Board has appointed Mr. Fisher as our CEO and Chairman. In addition, our Board appointed Mr. Gray to serve as the presiding outside director, and Mr. Gray is also the chair of the nominating and corporate governance committee.

The presiding outside director’s responsibilities include:

The Board has combined the role of Chairman and CEO, coupled with a presiding outside director. We believe that this is the Board leadership structure that will best serve our stockholders as a young public company. The combined role enables a single voice setting the tone and having primary responsibility for the management of

20

our company during this important transition period and beyond. As a young public company, our CEO is the person most familiar with our business and is in the best position to effectively identify strategic priorities and opportunities, leading the Board in the discussion of the execution of our strategy and facilitating the flow of information between the Board and management.

We believe that the designation of a presiding outside director with substantive responsibilities, a board comprised of a majority of members who are independent directors and our strong corporate governance policies and procedures achieves the appropriate balance for the combined role of Chairman and CEO.

The Board will regularly review its leadership structure and will take into account the responsibilities of the leadership positions and the directors qualified to hold such positions. In conducting this review, the Board will consider, among other things: (i) the policies and practices in place that provide independent board oversight; (ii) our performance and the effect a particular leadership structure may have on that performance; (iii) the structure that serves the best interests of our stockholders and (iv) any relevant legislative or regulatory developments.

The Board’s Role in Risk Management

Our full Board oversees our risk management process. Our Board oversees a company-wide approach to risk management, carried out by our management. Our full Board determines the appropriate risk for us generally, assesses the specific risks faced by us, and reviews the steps taken by management to manage those risks.

While the full Board maintains the ultimate oversight responsibility for the risk management process, its committees oversee risks in certain specified areas. In particular, our Compensation Committee is responsible for overseeing the management of risks relating to our executive compensation plans and arrangements, and the incentives created by the compensation awards it administers. Our Audit Committee oversees management of enterprise risks as well as financial and regulatory compliance risks. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance committee is responsible for overseeing the management of risks associated with the independence of our Board. Pursuant to our Board’s instruction, management regularly reports on applicable risks to the relevant committee or the full Board, as appropriate, with additional review or reporting on risks conducted as needed or as requested by our Board of Directors and its committees.

Legal Proceedings

To the best of our knowledge, there are no material proceedings adverse to us or any of our subsidiaries in which any of our directors, director nominees or executive officers or their affiliates or associates, or any owner of record or beneficially of more than 5% of any class of our Common Stock or their affiliates or associates, is a party adverse to us or in which any such person has an interest that is materially adverse to us or any of our subsidiaries.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During most of 2017, the Compensation Committee consisted of David C. Habiger (Chair), Gregg A. Kaplan and Mark A. Tebbe. In December 2017, Daniel R. Feehan succeeded Mr. Habiger as Chair of the Committee when Mr. Habiger resigned from the Board. Currently and at all times during 2017, none of our executive officers served on the compensation committee or as a director of another entity where an executive officer of that entity also served on our Compensation Committee or the Board.

Director Compensation

We provide competitive compensation to our directors who are not employed by us, or non-employee directors, which enables us to attract and retain high-quality directors, provide them with compensation at a level that is consistent with our compensation objectives and encourage their ownership of our stock to further align their interests with those of our stockholders. Our directors who are our full-time employees receive no additional compensation or stock awards for service on our Board, although we may reimburse them for travel and other expenses. Each of our directors received $55,625 for their service on our board of directors during 2017. We pay an

21

annual retainer fee of $57,500, which was increased from $50,000 in May 2017, to each non-employee director. We pay an annual retainer fee of $25,000 to the non-employee director chairs of each of the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee and to the independent director serving as the presiding outside director, and we also pay an annual retainer fee of $10,000 to the non-employee director chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. These retainers are paid in quarterly installments on the date of each regularly scheduled quarterly board meeting and are payable in cash.

Non-employee directors are each eligible to receive an annual grant of restricted stock units (RSU). An RSU grant valued at $117,500, which was increased from $100,000 in May 2017, was made to each of our non-employee directors on May 19, 2017, which will fully vest twelve months from the grant date, except for Mr. Habiger, whose RSU grant vested on January 10, 2018 as a result of our Board approving the acceleration of Mr. Habiger’s RSU vesting after he resigned from the Board of Directors on December 21, 2017. The number of RSUs granted was determined based on the closing price of our common stock on the first trading date of our common stock prior to the grant date. Our non-employee directors are eligible to receive annual RSU grants on or shortly following the date of each annual meeting of stockholders. The number of restricted stock units for such annual grants will be based upon the fair market value of our common stock on the date immediately preceding the grant date.

The table below sets forth the director compensation in 2017. Mr. Fisher, who also served as our CEO, received no compensation for serving as a director and is not included in the table below.

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Executive Summary

Our goal for our executive compensation program is to attract, motivate and retain high-quality executives who will provide leadership for our success in dynamic and competitive markets. We seek to accomplish this goal in a way that rewards performance and is aligned with our stockholders’ long-term interests. We believe in pay for performance, as further detailed throughout our “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” We believe that our

22

named executive officers’ compensation illustrates our pay for performance culture because a significant portion of the compensation of our named executive officers is tied to short- and long-term incentive compensation that is based on our performance or the performance of our common stock. The connection between pay and performance is the cornerstone of our executive compensation philosophy and strategy and serves to validate the design of our executive compensation program, which consists of the following primary elements:

We believe our 2017 executive compensation program strongly linked company performance and executive pay and aligned the interests of our named executive officers with the interests of our stockholders. The Compensation Committee will continue to monitor market practices and engage with our stockholders and other stakeholders to ensure that our executive compensation program is competitively positioned and appropriately structured to align pay and performance.

Named Executive Officers

The following individuals are our named executive officers for 2017.

Our Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

Our Compensation Committee determines the design of our executive compensation program and has implemented the executive compensation policies and practices described below.

General

We believe compensation provided to our executives should be performance-based, competitive in the markets and industries in which we compete for talent, closely linked to our stockholders’ interests and reflect each executive’s contribution in enhancing our stockholders’ investment in us.

Primary Objectives

The primary objectives of our executive compensation program are to:

23

Compensation Committee’s Role in Establishing Executive Compensation

Our Compensation Committee approves, or recommends to the independent members of our Board for approval, all compensation decisions relating to our named executive officers and other executive officers, including grants of short- and long-term incentive awards, which can include cash- and equity-based awards. Key responsibilities of our Compensation Committee are to:

Management’s Role in Establishing Compensation

Our Chief Executive Officer is the primary management contact with our Compensation Committee. Our Chief Executive Officer recommends to the Compensation Committee changes in compensation for our named executive officers, based on an assessment of each individual’s responsibilities and contributions to our results and the individual’s potential for future contributions to our success. None of the other executive officers are involved in recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation, and neither the Chief Executive Officer nor any other executive officers are involved in the determination of the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation.

Competitive Reference Points

Our Compensation Committee selects competitive market reference points with which we compare our executive compensation policies and practices from time to time. The Compensation Committee may retain compensation consultants to gather and present such information.

The Compensation Committee has reviewed the compensation policies and practices of a peer group of publicly-traded companies participating in a sufficiently broad range of industries to capture the uniqueness of our business, customers, industry, technology and regulatory environment. Our Compensation Committee believes the peer group companies to be of a similar size to Enova and to operate in high-technology, internet retail, online-focused consumer finance or otherwise operate in highly regulated industries.

Our Compensation Committee considers the information provided by our compensation consultant about our peer group as a competitive reference point and not a benchmark for compensation decisions.

These reference points are used by the Compensation Committee as a factor to assess the market competiveness of our pay programs for our named executive officers in respect of the following:

Base Salaries. Subject to the discretion of the Compensation Committee, when setting base salaries we reference the range between the 50th percentile and 75th percentile of our competitive group, aligning closer to the 75th percentile for sustained superior performance;

Short-term Incentive Compensation. Subject to the discretion of the Compensation Committee, when setting short-term incentive compensation targets we reference the range between the 50th percentile and 75th percentile of our competitive group, with awards closer to the 75th percentile for sustained superior performance; and

24

Long-term Incentive Compensation. Subject to the discretion of the Compensation Committee, , when setting long-term incentive compensation targets we reference the range between the 50th percentile and 75th percentile of our competitive group, with awards closer to the 75th percentile for sustained superior performance.

Our Compensation Committee engaged Towers Watson to review and update the peer group to be used by the Compensation Committee in determining future compensation for our named executive officers. The following publicly traded companies were identified as our peer group for 2017 compensation decisions made by our Compensation Committee:

We believe it is important to maintain peer group stability from year-to-year, but equally important to make changes when they would improve market comparability and better align with our peer group selection criteria. As such, in late 2017, with the support of Towers Watson, the Compensation Committee approved no changes from our previous-year peer group to the peer group to be used for 2018 compensation decisions. We believe this peer group supports our desire to include companies that provide consumer lending, face a similar regulatory environment and have a strong data-analytics focus.

Principal Elements of Executive Compensation

Elements of executive compensation include:

25

In addition to our Compensation Committee, from time to time our Board may also review and approve our executive compensation philosophy or elements thereof and other matters related thereto when necessary or appropriate.

2017 Compensation for Named Executive Officers

The 2017 compensation levels for Mr. Chartier, Mr. Cunningham, Ms. Young and Mr. Zeeman were recommended by Mr. Fisher and approved by the Compensation Committee at the beginning of 2017. In determining 2017 compensation levels, the Compensation Committee considered each element of Mr. Chartier’s, Mr. Cunningham’s, Mr. Fisher’s, Ms. Young’s and Mr. Zeeman’s overall compensation and the fit of each such element into each officer’s compensation package as a whole. 2017 compensation packages were designed with a goal of balancing short-term compensation, including base compensation and short-term incentive compensation, with long-term compensation. Each named executive officer’s overall compensation package was subject to achieving certain financial targets on both a short-term basis and a long-term basis. Both short-term incentive compensation and long-term incentive compensation were utilized to link the compensation of our named executive officers to stockholder interests so that named executive officers could receive pay commensurate with our Company’s financial performance on both a short- and long-term basis.

Base Salary

Base salaries are reviewed and considered by the Compensation Committee on an annual basis or as otherwise deemed appropriate by the Compensation Committee. Mr. Fisher’s 2017 base salary was set by the Compensation Committee at a level the Compensation Committee believed to be competitive in the market where we compete for talent. In recommending the 2017 salary for Mr. Chartier, Mr. Cunningham, Ms. Young and Mr. Zeeman to the Compensation Committee, Mr. Fisher took into consideration the overall performance of the Company, each officer’s breadth of responsibilities, impact on financial and operational results over the prior year, leadership and accomplishments that affected the performance, a qualitative assessment, and achievement of goals throughout the year.

The annual salaries for our named executive officers in 2017, including their percentage increase over their 2016 salaries were as follows:

26

Short-Term Incentive Compensation

On October 14, 2014, the Compensation Committee approved the terms of a Senior Executive Bonus Plan, which provides for 75% of STI incentive compensation opportunity, and a Discretionary Bonus Plan, which provides for 25% of STI incentive compensation opportunity (collectively, the STI plan). The Senior Executive Bonus Plan allows us to make annual cash-based incentive payments that could potentially qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Code Section 162(m).

By March 15, 2017, our Compensation Committee approved the performance measures and goals and the threshold, target and maximum opportunities, as applicable, for the 2017 performance period of the Senior Executive Bonus Plan and the Discretionary Bonus Plan. Threshold, target and maximum opportunities, as applicable, as a percentage of base salary for each named executive officer may vary at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. The target award amounts for 2017 STI incentive compensation as a percentage of base salary for our named executive officers for the 2017 STI plan were as follows:

Threshold, target and maximum opportunity under the Senior Executive Bonus Plan for 2017 for each of our named executive officers and actual amounts earned under the Senior Executive Bonus Plan for 2017 were as follows:

Our 2017 STI performance measures and goals were based on our earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization expenses (EBITDA), which is a non-GAAP financial measure (2017 STI EBITDA), and had the following requirements in order for potential STI awards to be earned and paid pursuant to the Senior Executive Bonus Plan:

Our actual 2017 STI EBITDA was $148.8 million, which is comprised of the following:

27

The 2017 STI EBITDA did not meet the Earnings Target for 2017, thus payments were made below target levels under the terms of the Senior Executive Bonus Plan.

Our Compensation Committee also adopted five performance objectives and the target opportunities for the 2017 performance period of the Discretionary Bonus Plan. The performance objectives were to (i) achieve a 95% completion rate within 15 days after the year end for all training courses, (ii) maintain effective compliance and training programs in the jurisdictions in which we operate such that there are no significant regulatory actions taken by our regulators, (iii) maintain high customer satisfaction levels, (iv) be an Employer of Choice for great talent and (v) handle all customer funding and payments successfully. The Discretionary Bonus Plan is intended to increase stockholder value and our success by providing our officers and other employees with discretionary bonus awards based upon exceptional individual achievement or exceptional performance by us or our individual business units. The Compensation Committee assessed the Company’s performance against the 2017 performance measures, considered the individual performance in 2017 of our participating executive officers and approved the following actual payments under the Discretionary Bonus Plan to our participating named executive officers:

In summary, actual payments under the 2017 STI plan for each of our participating named executive officers were as follows:

Long-Term Incentive Compensation

Long-term incentive compensation was awarded under the Company’s 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan adopted in October 2014, as amended in February 2016, and approved by our Stockholders in May 2016 (2014 LTIP). The purpose of the 2014 LTIP is to promote the interests of Enova and its stockholders by giving us a competitive advantage in attracting, retaining and motivating employees, officers, consultants and directors capable of assuring our future success, to offer such persons incentives that are directly linked to the profitability of our business and increases in stockholder value, and to afford such persons an opportunity to acquire a proprietary interest in Enova. A variety of plan-based awards may be made under the 2014 LTIP, including equity and non-equity awards.

Our Compensation Committee approved long-term incentive awards under the 2014 LTIP to our named executive officers during 2017. These awards include (a) restricted stock units (RSUs), and (b) stock options.

28

These awards were intended to motivate our named executive officers to achieve or exceed performance goals and be retention awards designed to minimize the risk of loss of our executive officers. In February 2017, our Compensation Committee approved long-term incentive awards made under the 2014 LTIP to Mr. Chartier, Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Fisher, Ms. Young and Mr. Zeeman. The awards granted included (a) restricted stock units and (b) a grant of options to purchase Company stock.

The following table shows the number and the grant date fair market value (in dollars and as a percentage of base salary) of restricted stock units and stock options granted to each of our named executive officers in 2017:

Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits

Enova provides perquisites and other personal benefits to its officers that it believes are reasonable and consistent with its overall compensation program. A description of these perquisites and personal benefits, including the attributed costs, for our named executive officers for the year ended December 31, 2017, are included in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table and described in the notes to that table.

2018 Compensation Decisions

Base Salary

In connection with its annual review of base salaries of our named executive officers, in January 2018, our Compensation Committee approved increased annual base salaries for Mr. Chartier, Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Fisher, Ms. Young and Mr. Zeeman effective as of February 11, 2018 as follows:

29

The increases for all of our named executive officers were supported by the Company’s solid financial performance in 2017 as well as meeting the Company’s qualitative goals for the year. Individual increases for our named executive officers were supported by their individual performance and the performance of the areas of the business they manage.

Short-Term Incentive Compensation

In February 2018, our Compensation Committee approved the performance measures and goals of the STI plan for fiscal 2018, which includes the Senior Executive Bonus Plan and Discretionary Bonus Plan for our named executive officers. The target STI award amounts for 2018 expressed as a percentage of base salary for our named executive officers for the 2018 STI plan are as follows:

Our Compensation Committee has also adopted the following five performance objectives for the Discretionary Bonus Plan for 2018: a) achieve a 95% completion rate within 15 days after the year end for all training courses, b) maintain effective compliance and training programs in the jurisdiction in which we operate such that there are no significant regulatory actions taken by our regulators, c) maintain high customer satisfaction levels, d) be an Awesome Place to Work for great talent and e) handle all customer funding and payments successfully.

Long-Term Incentive Compensation

In February 2018, our Compensation Committee made annual grants of RSUs and stock options to our named executive officers as follows:

30

Retirement and Other Benefits

On July 1, 2012, we established and now sponsor (i) the Enova International, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan (Enova 401(k) Savings Plan), (ii) the Enova International, Inc. Nonqualified Savings Plan (Enova NQSP), and (iii) the Enova International, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (Enova SERP), in which our named executive officers and other eligible employees may participate. We offer these plans to provide our executives and other eligible employees with retirement savings vehicles that are competitive in the marketplace in which we compete for talent.

Enova 401(k) and Enova NQSP

Substantially all of our employees and those of our U.S. subsidiaries are eligible to participate in the Enova 401(k). Certain of our highly-compensated employees, including our named executive officers, are also eligible to participate in the Enova NQSP.

Beginning in 2015, 100% of the first 1% of pay and 50% of the next 5% of pay that each employee contributes to the Enova 401(k) is matched by us. All employee contributions are fully vested upon contribution. Our matching contributions subsequent to January 1, 2015 will fully vest after an employee’s second year of service with us and will also fully vest if an employee dies, becomes disabled or reaches age 59 1/2 during employment. Prior to January 1, 2015, 50% of the first 5% of pay that each employee contributed to the Enova 401(k) was matched by us. All employee contributions were fully vested upon contribution. Our matching contributions prior to January 1, 2015 vest ratably over an employee’s first five years of service with us or our former parent company, Cash America International, Inc. (Cash America), and also become fully vested if an employee dies, becomes disabled or reaches age 59 1/2 during employment. Employees may select from among several mutual funds when investing their 401(k) account funds.

The Enova NQSP is a nonqualified retirement savings plan into which participants may contribute portions of their salary in excess of the 401(k) contribution limits. Enova NQSP participants can also defer up to 80% of their STI awards and annual bonuses into the Enova NQSP. If a participant’s pay exceeded the IRS limit on amounts that could be taken into account for contributions to the Enova 401(k) prior to 2016, we matched 50% of the first 5% of compensation deferred to the Enova NQSP in excess of the 401(k) compensation limit; however, if a participant participated in both the Enova 401(k) and the Enova NQSP, the combined match to both plans was limited to 50% of the first 5% of the participant’s pay. This plan generally offers the same investment options as the Enova 401(k). Our matching contributions in the Enova NQSP vest immediately.

We generally distribute each participant’s Enova NQSP account in a lump sum shortly after the participant’s separation from service with us and all of our affiliates. Alternatively, a participant can elect to receive his or her Enova NQSP account at a later date or receive payments in up to 10 annual installments. Most officers cannot receive a distribution of any portion of their account during the first six months after their separation from service. A participant generally may not receive any portion of his or her Enova NQSP account while employed, unless the participant makes an in-service distribution election before the deferred compensation is earned or suffers a severe financial hardship. We may pay Enova NQSP distributions from a Rabbi trust associated with the Enova NQSP or from the general assets of the entity that is the participant’s employer. A participant would have the rights of a general unsecured creditor of the entity that is his or her employer for any Enova NQSP benefits he or she is owed.

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

We provide supplemental executive retirement plan benefits to our officers and certain other eligible employees as a supplement to their retirement benefits under the Enova SERP. After the end of each plan year, we

31

make discretionary supplemental contributions that are credited to the Enova SERP account of each named executive officer who was employed by us on the last day of the plan year. The rate of return of a participant’s Enova SERP account is determined by the rate of return on deemed investments in mutual funds that a participant selects. Enova SERP participants’ deemed investment options are generally the same as the investment options available under the Enova 401(k). Participants vest in their Enova SERP accounts over their first five years of service with us and are fully vested in their Enova SERP accounts and new contributions to those accounts after that five-year period.

We generally distribute each participant’s Enova SERP account as a lump sum soon after the participant’s separation from service with us and all of our affiliates. An Enova SERP participant may, however, elect to defer receipt of the Enova SERP account for at least an additional five years beyond his or her separation from service and may also elect to receive the Enova SERP account in up to ten annual installments. Most officers cannot receive a distribution of any portion of their account during the first six months after their separation from service. A participant generally may not withdraw any portion of his or her Enova SERP account during employment, except in the case of a severe financial hardship. We may pay Enova SERP benefits from a Rabbi trust associated with the Enova SERP or from the general assets of the entity that is the participant’s employer. A participant would have the rights of a general unsecured creditor of the entity that is his or her employer for any Enova SERP benefits he or she is owed.

Our Compensation Committee administers the Enova SERP and annually determines the supplemental contributions for each of our named executive officers. The targeted (but non-binding) amount of the supplemental contribution for each plan year is a percentage of each participant’s compensation. The compensation on which the supplemental contribution is based is the base salary, plus the lesser of (a) the participant’s target STI award payable during the plan year for the preceding year’s performance and (b) the actual STI award paid during the plan year based on the preceding year’s performance. The contribution amounts are prorated for the portion of the year that a participant was eligible to participate in the Enova SERP, and are credited to the participant’s Enova SERP account before March 15 of the following year. For 2017, the supplemental contributions for each of our named executive officers, reflected as a percentage of the combined base salary paid during the year and the target STI award for the 2017 year, are listed below.

For the Enova SERP, Mr. Fisher and Mr. Chartier were vested in 80% of our contributions at the end of 2017 because they joined Enova in January 2013 and April 2013, respectively. For the Enova 401(k), Mr. Fisher and Mr. Chartier were vested in 80% of our contributions in conjunction with their deferrals in 2013 and 2014 and were fully vested in our contributions for their deferrals made in 2015, 2016 and 2017. For the Enova SERP, Mr. Cunningham was vested in 20% of our contributions at the end of 2017 because he joined Enova in June 2016. For the Enova 401(k), Mr. Cunningham was not vested in our contributions at the end of 2017. For the Enova SERP, Mr. Zeeman was vested in 40% of our contributions at the end of 2017 because he joined Enova in October 2015. For the Enova 401(k), Mr. Zeeman was fully vested in our contributions for his deferrals made in 2016 and 2017. Ms. Young had more than five years of service and was fully vested in our SERP and 401(k) contributions at the end of 2017.

Severance Arrangements for Named Executive Officers

On November 13, 2014 in connection with our spin-off (Spin-Off) from Cash America, we entered into an Executive Change-in-Control Severance and Restrictive Covenant Agreement (CIC Agreements) with our executive officers, including Mr. Fisher, Mr. Chartier and Ms. Young. Also, upon commencement of their employment, we entered into CIC Agreements with Mr. Cunningham and Mr. Zeeman. The term of each CIC Agreement will

32

continue in effect through November 13, 2018, with an automatic one-year extension at the end of such term unless we or an executive officer provides notice not to extend the term on or before May 13, 2018. The Term will automatically be extended for subsequent one-year periods unless we or the executive officer provide notice not to extend the Term at least six months prior to the scheduled extension date. In addition, the Term will automatically be extended for two years following a Change-in-Control (as defined in the CIC Agreements).

The CIC Agreements provide our executive officers with severance payments and certain benefits in the event of his or her termination by us without Cause (as defined in the CIC Agreements) or by the relevant executive officers for Good Reason (as defined in the CIC Agreements) during the twelve months following a Change-in-Control (as defined in the CIC Agreements). Such payments and benefits include the following: (i) a lump sum payment equal to the executive officer’s unpaid base salary, accrued vacation pay and unreimbursed business expenses, as well as all certain other items earned by and owed to such executive officer through the termination date; (ii) a lump sum payment equal to the pro rata portion of the executive officer’s annual target bonus amount for the year in which the termination occurs; (iii) a lump sum payment equal to (A) for Mr. Fisher, two times the higher of (1) his base salary in effect at the termination date and (2) his base salary in effect on the date of the Change-in-Control and (B) for all other executive officers, one times the higher of (1) his or her base salary in effect at the termination date and (2) his or her base salary in effect on the date of the Change-in-Control; (iv) a lump sum amount equal to (A) for Mr. Fisher, two times the higher of (1) his annual target bonus for the year in which the termination occurs and (2) the actual annual bonus payments made to Mr. Fisher for the year preceding the year in which the termination occurs and (B) for all other executive officers, one times the higher of (1) his or her annual target bonus for the year in which the termination occurs and (2) the actual annual bonus payments made to such executive officer for the year preceding the year in which the termination occurs; (v) the immediate vesting of any outstanding cash-based long term incentive awards held by the executive officer, including a lump sum payment for any vested awards (the value of which to be determined after the termination date in accordance with the CIC Agreements); (vi) the immediate vesting and lapse of all restrictions on any outstanding stock-based awards held by the executive officer to the extent not already provided for in the related grant agreement(s); (vii) equivalent payment for continued medical coverage under our group health plan and/or under our supplemental executive medical expense reimbursement plan for the executive and the executive’s dependents for a period of twenty-four months for Mr. Fisher or twelve months for all other executive officers following the termination date in accordance with the terms of the relevant CIC Agreement; and (ix) up to $50,000 for Mr. Fisher or $25,000 for all other executive officers for reimbursement of amounts paid by the executive officer for reasonable outplacement services from an executive search firm to the extent such expenses are incurred as a direct result of the separation from service and within twenty-four months for Mr. Fisher or twelve months for all other executive officers after the termination date.

Additionally, the CIC Agreements contain certain restrictive covenants to which the executive officers are subject. These include confidentiality, non-disclosure, non-solicitation and non-competition provisions. The term of the non-competition provision applies during the term of the executive officer’s employment through the twenty-four-month period for Mr. Fisher or twelve-month period for all other executive officers following termination (the Subject Period). Such provision restricts the executive officer from competing with us or any of our subsidiaries or affiliates (including former subsidiaries or affiliates, which is collectively referred to as the Enterprise), by providing employment (other than to the Enterprise), management or consulting services, similar to those provided by the executive officer to the Enterprise with respect to any products or services similar to those offered or under development by the Company or any of its affiliates or subsidiaries anywhere within the Territory (as defined in the CIC Agreements) during the Subject Period.

In addition, we have adopted a severance pay plan for executives that provides guidance for severance pay, continued medical and health benefits, payment of accrued but unused paid time off and an allowance for outplacement services for our executive officers following certain terminations not related to a change-in-control.

Incentive Compensation Recovery Policy

The 2014 LTIP contains a clawback provision that would allow us, in the event that there is a material restatement of our financial results, to (i) cancel part or all of the outstanding portion of any award, whether or not vested, and/or (ii) require a participant to repay an amount, satisfied in cash or in another form of consideration, such as shares of common stock as permitted by applicable law and as acceptable to the Compensation Committee,

33

equal to all or any portion of the value of shares of common stock that have been issued and other payments that have been made to the participant pursuant to any award within the two years preceding the date on which we are required to prepare an accounting restatement, to the extent that such value or payment amount was based on the erroneous data and exceeded the value or amount that would have been paid to the participant under the accounting restatement. The 2014 LTIP also permits us, to the extent required to comply with applicable laws and/or any compensation recovery or clawback policy adopted by us after the date the 2014 LTIP was approved by our Stockholders, to unilaterally amend the clawback provision in the 2014 LTIP, with any such amendment binding on all participants.

The Senior Executive Bonus Plan also contains a clawback provision that would allow us to recoup certain compensation and awards paid to our officers in certain circumstances in the event that there is a material restatement of our financial results.

Deductibility of Executive Compensation

Our Compensation Committee reviews and considers the deductibility of executive compensation under Code Section 162(m), which provides that we may not deduct compensation of more than $1 million that is paid to certain individuals. Compensation that qualified as “performance-based” under Code Section 162(m) was exempt from this $1 million limitation. Our Compensation Committee may, in certain situations, approve compensation that will not meet these deductibility requirements in order to ensure competitive levels of compensation for our executive officers, including our named executive officers, and when from time to time qualitative strategic initiatives are agreed upon to supplement objective performance goals.

As part of Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Reform”) that was signed into law December 22, 2017, the ability to rely on this “qualified performance-based compensation” exception was eliminated, and the limitation on deductibility was generally expanded to include all named executive officers. Although we maintain compensation arrangements that may have been intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Code Section 162(m) prior to Tax Reform, subject to certain transition relief rules, we may no longer take a deduction for certain compensation paid to our covered employees in excess of $1 million. Furthermore, although the Compensation Committee may have taken action intended to limit the impact of Code Section 162(m), it also believes that the tax deduction is only one of several relevant considerations in setting compensation. The Committee believes that shareholder interests are best served by not restricting the Committee’s discretion and flexibility in structuring compensation programs, even though such programs may result in non-deductible compensation expenses. Accordingly, achieving the desired flexibility in the design and delivery of compensation may have resulted (and may continue to result, in light of the recent changes in law) in compensation that in certain cases is not deductible for federal income tax purposes.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

Our Compensation Committee has established stock ownership guidelines that require ownership of our stock that is five times base salary for our chief executive officer, three times base salary for our other executive officers and two times the annual retainer for directors, subject to certain achievement timelines. Until the stock ownership guidelines are met, named executive officers and directors are required to retain 50% of any shares of stock they receive on a net after tax basis. Our executive officers and directors currently comply with the applicable stock ownership guidelines.

Restrictions on Pledges of our Securities and Certain Trading Practices

Among other things, our Insider Trading Policy does not permit any director or associate of the Company, including officers, to engage in short sales or trade in market options or any other kind of derivatives related to Company securities, hold the Company’s securities in a margin account or pledge Company securities as collateral for a loan or engage in hedging or monetization transactions, such as zero-cost collars and forward sale contracts.

34

Compensation Risk Assessment

Our Compensation Committee has reviewed our compensation policies and practices, including incentive programs, to ensure they do not encourage unreasonable or excessive risk-taking. Based upon this review, we believe our compensation policies and practices are not reasonably likely to expose us to unreasonable or excessive risk that could have a material adverse effect on us. We believe our practice of providing a significant portion of compensation in the form of long-term equity compensation and using multiple performance measures in our incentive plans serve to balance risk and reward. We also maintain a prohibition on hedging and an incentive compensation recovery policy to mitigate undue risk associated with compensation.

35

Management Development and Compensation Committee Report

As the Management Development and Compensation Committee of the board of directors of Enova International, Inc., we have reviewed and discussed the foregoing Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) with the Company’s management. Based on this review and discussion, the Management Development and Compensation Committee recommends to the Company’s board of directors that the CD&A be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 and this proxy statement.

Daniel R. Feehan, Chair

Gregg A. Kaplan

Mark A. Tebbe

36

Executive Compensation

Summary Compensation Table

The following table and footnotes discuss the compensation of our named executive officers in 2017, 2016 and 2015.

37

The 2016 amounts shown in this column reflect payments made under the Senior Executive Bonus Plan portion of the 2016 STI plan.

The 2015 amount shown in this column for Mr. Fisher reflects a payment made under the Discretionary Bonus Plan.

Executive Agreements

Employment Letter Agreement with Mr. Cunningham

Pursuant to the terms of his offer letter, the material terms of Mr. Cunningham’s compensation include an annualized base salary of $435,000 and a short term discretionary performance bonus with a target value of 70% of his annual salary under the Company’s Senior Executive Bonus Plan and the Company’s Discretionary Bonus Plan. The bonus paid for 2016 performance was prorated as of Mr. Cunningham’s start date; provided, however that for purposes of calculating the bonus, Mr. Cunningham’s start date was deemed to be three months prior to his actual start date, and the amount of the bonus was to be not less than the target value, as prorated for Mr. Cunningham’s deemed start date. Mr. Cunningham was also eligible to receive an annual long-term incentive award in the form of restricted stock and stock options under the 2014 LTIP with a target value of 200% of his annual salary, subject to the discretion and approval of the board of directors of the Company, with the award granted in the first quarter of 2017 at the time other annual awards were made under the 2014 LTIP. Mr. Cunningham also received a new hire equity award valued at $750,000, which consisted of RSUs awarded under the 2014 LTIP. The RSU award vests in increments of 25% on the first four anniversaries of the award date, subject to the conditions of the 2014 LTIP. Mr. Cunningham also received a cash sign-on bonus of $525,000, one-third of which was paid within 30 days of Mr. Cunningham’s start date, one-third of which was paid on the first anniversary of his start date and one-third of which will be paid on the second anniversary of his start date. Repayment of the first installment of the cash sign-on bonus would have been required if Mr. Cunningham separated from the Company voluntarily earlier than 12 months from the date of employment. Mr. Cunningham also participates in the Company’s customary health and welfare benefit programs available to other executive officers, and he has entered into a CIC Agreement.

38

Employment Letter Agreement with Mr. Zeeman

Pursuant to the terms of his offer letter, the material terms of Mr. Zeeman’s compensation included an annualized base salary of $450,000 and, beginning in 2016, a target cash bonus of 75% of his annual salary (under the Company’s Senior Executive Bonus Plan and Discretionary Bonus Plan). Also beginning in 2016, Mr. Zeeman was eligible to receive an annual long-term incentive award under the Company’s long-term incentive plan with a target value of 225% of his annual salary, with the same equity mix and vesting schedule as other annual award recipients and a minimum award value of $1,000,000 for the 2016 grant. Mr. Zeeman also received a new hire equity award valued at $1,200,000, consisting of 50% RSUs and 50% non-qualified stock options. The RSU award vests in increments of 25% on the first four anniversaries of the award date, and the stock options vest in increments of 33.33% on the first three anniversaries of the award date, subject to continued employment. Mr. Zeeman also received a cash sign-on bonus of $600,000, one-third of which was paid within 30 days of Mr. Zeeman’s start date and one-third of which was paid on the first and second anniversaries of his start date. Repayment of the first installment of the cash sign-on bonus would have been required if Mr. Zeeman separated from the Company voluntarily earlier than 12 months from the date of employment. Mr. Zeeman also participates in the Company’s customary health and welfare benefits available to other executive officers, and he has entered into a CIC Agreement.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table provides information about the equity and non-equity plan-based awards made to our named executive officers under the 2014 LTIP and our STI plan during 2017.