EX-99.1 10 d826913dex991.htm EX-99.1 EX-99.1

Exhibit 99.1

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

Case Name:    BRISTOW GROUP INC., et al.       Petition Date: May 11, 2019
Case Number:    19-32713         

MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT SUMMARY FOR THE PERIOD

 

Monthly Period (USD $ millions)

   Sep-19  

Revenues (MOR-4)

   $  29.4  

Operating Income / (Loss) (MOR-4)

   $ (6.9

Net Income (Loss) (MOR-4)

   $ (62.2

Payments to Professionals (MOR-7)

   $ (1.7
  

 

 

 

Total Disbursements (Exhibit A)

   $ (49.3
  

 

 

 

 

**

Document reflects Debtors only, and does not contain any information related to consolidated non-Debtors**

**

The original of this document must be filed with the United States Bankruptcy Court**

 

Required Insurance Maintained

As of Signature Date

  

Exp. Date

Auto Liability

   Yes (X) No ( )    Oct-1-20

D&O Liability

   Yes (X) No ( )    Jan-31-20*

Flood Liability

   Yes (X) No ( )    Sep-13-20

Hull & Liability

   Yes (X) No ( )    Apr-1-20

Property Liability

   Yes (X) No ( )    Jul-31-20

Workers Comp Liability

   Yes (X) No ( )    Jul-1-20

Other

   Yes (X) No ( )    Various

 

*

D&O Excess Liability coverage included a 6 year run-off

 

Attorney Name:    Chris Newcomb
Firm Name:    Baker Botts L.L.P.
Address:    910 Louisiana St #3200
  
City, State, ZIP:    Houston, TX 77002
Telephone/Fax:    (713) 229-1234
     Circle One

Are all accounts receivable being collected within terms?

   LOGO    No

Are all post-petition liabilities, including taxes, being paid within terms?

   LOGO    No

Have any pre-petition liabilities been paid?

   LOGO    No

If so, describe

      Pursuant to various “first day” orders, including Critical and Foreign Vendors, Taxes, Employee Wages & Benefits, 503(b)(0) Insurance, Cash Management, Cash Collateral, and Utilities.

Were any assets disposed of outside the normal course of business?

  

Yes

   LOGO

If so, describe   n/a

What is the status of your Plan of Reorganization?

   The Debtors’ Amended Plan of Reorganization (“the Plan”) was confirmed on October 4th, 2019 by the U.S.
   Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas.
   I certify that the following complete Monthly Operating Report (MOR), consisting of MOR-1 through MOR-7 is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.

 

SIGNED X

   LOGO      

Senior Vice President &

CFO of Bristow Group Inc.

   (Original Signature)       Title
   Brian J. Allman       10/30/2019
   (Print Name of Signatory)       Date
 

 

MOR-1    Page 1 of 11


IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

Case Name:    BRISTOW GROUP INC., et al.       Petition Date: May 11, 2019
Case Number:    19-32713         

GLOBAL NOTES AND STATEMENTS OF LIMITATIONS AND

DISCLAIMERS REGARDING THE DEBTORS’ MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT

On May 11, 2019 (the “Petition Date”), Bristow Group Inc. and its affiliated debtors, as debtors and debtors in possession (collectively, the “Debtors”), each commenced with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas (the “Court”) a voluntary case under chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”). The Debtors are authorized to continue operating their businesses and managing their properties as debtors in possession pursuant to sections 1107(a) and 1108 of the Bankruptcy Code. On May 13, 2019, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order authorizing the joint administration of these cases pursuant to Rule 1015(b) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure. On May 23, 2019, the United States Trustee for Region 7 (the “U.S. Trustee”) appointed an official committee of unsecured creditors pursuant to section 1102(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code (the “Creditors’ Committee”).

 

  1.

General Methodology. The Debtors are filing their monthly operating report (the “MOR”) solely for purposes of complying with the monthly operating requirements applicable in the Debtors’ chapter 11 cases. The financial information contained herein is unaudited, limited in scope, and as discussed below, not prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The MOR should not be relied upon by any persons for information relating to current or future financial conditions, events, or performance of any of the Debtors or their affiliates, as the results of operations contained herein are not necessarily indicative of results which may be expected from any other period or for the full year, and may not necessarily reflect the consolidated results of operations, financial position, and schedule of receipts and disbursements in the future. There can be no assurance that such information is complete, and the MOR may be subject to revision. The following notes, statements, and limitations should be referred to, and referenced in connection with, any review of the MOR.

 

  2.

Basis of Presentation. In preparing the MOR, the Debtors relied on financial data derived from their books and records that was available at the time of preparation. Nevertheless, in preparing this MOR, the Debtors made reasonable efforts to supplement the information set forth in their books and records with additional information concerning transactions that may not have been identified therein. Subsequent information or discovery may result in material changes to the MOR and errors or omissions may exist. Notwithstanding any such discovery, new information, or errors or omissions, the Debtors do not undertake any obligation or commitment to update this MOR.

 

Notes    Page 2 of 11


IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

Case Name:    BRISTOW GROUP INC., et al.       Petition Date: May 11, 2019
Case Number:    19-32713         

GLOBAL NOTES AND STATEMENTS OF LIMITATIONS AND

DISCLAIMERS REGARDING THE DEBTORS’ MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT

 

  3.

Reporting Period. Unless otherwise noted herein, the MOR generally reflects the Debtors’ books and records and financial activity occurring during the applicable reporting period. Except as otherwise noted, no adjustments have been made for activity occurring after the close of the reporting period.

 

  4.

Accuracy. The financial information disclosed herein was not prepared in accordance with federal or state securities laws or other applicable non-bankruptcy law or in lieu of complying with any periodic reporting requirements thereunder. Persons and entities trading in or otherwise purchasing, selling, or transferring the claims against or equity interests in the Debtors should evaluate this financial information in light of the purposes for which it was prepared. The Debtors are not liable for and undertake no responsibility to indicate variations from securities laws or for any evaluations of the Debtors based on this financial information or any other information.

 

  5.

Payment of Prepetition Claims Pursuant to First Day Orders. On May 15, 2019 and June 27, 2019, the Bankruptcy Court entered orders (the “First Day Orders”) authorizing, but not directing, the Debtors to, among other things, pay certain prepetition (a) liabilities related to use of the Debtors’ cash collateral, and continued use of their cash management system, (b) obligations payable to specified foreign claimants, (c) insurance obligations, (d) employee wages, salaries, and related items, (e) obligations related to the provision of utility services, (f) obligations relating to critical vendors and certain other specified trade claimants, and (g) taxes. If any payments were made on account of such claims following the commencement of these chapter 11 cases pursuant to the authority granted to the Debtors by the Bankruptcy Court under the First Day Orders, such payments have been included in this MOR unless otherwise noted.

 

  6.

Reservation of Rights. The Debtors reserve all rights to amend or supplement the MOR in all respects, as may be necessary or appropriate, but shall be under no obligation to do so. Nothing contained in this MOR shall constitute a waiver of any of the Debtors’ rights or an admission with respect to their chapter 11 cases.

 

Notes    Page 3 of 11


IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

Case Name:    BRISTOW GROUP INC., et al.
Case Number:    19-32713
Petition Date:    May 11, 2019

Debtor Balance Sheets (as of):

 

(USD $ millions)

   31-Sep-19  (1)  

Current Assets

  

Cash and Cash Equivalents

   $ 39.1  

Accounts Receivable—3rd Party

     43.3  

Accounts Receivable—Intercompany

     458.1  

Inventories

     35.6  

Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets

     14.7  
  

 

 

 

Total Current Assets

     590.7  

Non-Current Assets

  

Investment in Consolidated Affiliates

     646.3  

Land and Buildings (at cost)

     63.0  

Aircraft and Equipment (at cost)

     1,902.2  

Less: Accumulated Depreciation

     (600.0
  

 

 

 

Net Property Plant and Equipment

     1,365.3  

Right-of-use Assets

     297.5  

LT Note Receivable—Intercompany

     377.1  

Other Assets

     8.0  
  

 

 

 

Total Non-Current Assets

     2,694.2  
  

 

 

 

Total Assets

   $ 3,284.9  
  

 

 

 

Notes:

 

(1) -

Includes implementation of ASC 842 with the exception of guidelines for intercompany leases.

 

MOR-2    Page 4 of 11


IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

Case Name:    BRISTOW GROUP INC., et al.
Case Number:    19-32713
Petition Date:    May 11, 2019

Debtor Balance Sheets (as of):

 

(USD $ millions)

   31-Sep-19  (1)  

Current Liabilities

  

Accounts Payable—3rd Party

   $ 37.3  

Accounts Payable—Intercompany

     109.8  

Accrued Wages, Benefits and Related Taxes

     14.8  

Income Taxes Payable

     (3.4

Other Accrued Taxes

     3.4  

Deferred Revenue

     0.0  

Accrued Maintenance and Repairs

     2.1  

Accrued Interest

     6.8  

Current Portion of Operating Lease Liabilities

     80.1  

Other Accrued Liabilities

     25.7  

Short-Term Borrowings and Current Maturities of Long-Term Debt

     831.8  
  

 

 

 

Total Current Liabilities

     1,108.4  

Non-Current Liabilities

  

Long-term debt, less current maturities

     34.2  

LT Note Payable—Intercompany

     77.4  

Other liabilities and deferred credits

     7.3  

Deferred taxes

     72.5  

Long-term Operating Lease Liabilities

     217.4  
  

 

 

 

Total Non-Current Liabilities

     408.9  
  

 

 

 

Liabilities Not Subject to Compromise

     1,517.3  

Liabilities Subject to Compromise

     625.5  
  

 

 

 

Total Liabilities

     2,142.8  
  

 

 

 

Total Equity

     1,142.1  
  

 

 

 

Total Liabilities And Equity

   $ 3,284.9  
  

 

 

 

Notes:

 

(1) -

Includes implementation of ASC 842 with the exception of guidelines for intercompany leases.

 

MOR-2    Page 5 of 11


IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

Case Name:    BRISTOW GROUP INC., et al.
Case Number:    19-32713
Petition Date:    May 11, 2019

Aging of Debtor Post-Petition Accounts Payable and Receivable (as of September 30, 2019):

(USD $ millions)

Aging

 

Days

   Trade
Accounts
Payable(1)
     Trade Accounts
Receivable(2)
 

Current

   $ 4.0      $ 22.8  

1-30

     2.5        2.4  

31-60

     1.9        2.2  

61-90

     1.2        2.0  

91-120

     0.2        1.3  

120+

     0.6        0.4  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 10.4      $ 31.0  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Notes:

 

(1) -

Based on the Debtors’ aging reports. Does not include goods received not invoiced or accrued AP included in the trial balance. Does not include pre-petition trade AP.

(2) -

Based on the Debtor’s aging reports. Does not include income tax and other non-trade receivables included in the trial balance.

 

MOR-3    Page 6 of 11


IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

Case Name:    BRISTOW GROUP INC., et al.
Case Number:    19-32713
Petition Date:    May 11, 2019

Debtor Statement of Income (Loss) for the Month of:

 

Profit and Loss (USD $ millions)

   30-Sep-19  

Total Revenue(1)

   $ 29.4  

Operating Expenses

  

Direct Costs

     18.9  

Reimbursable Expense

     0.5  

Depreciation and Amortization

     10.6  

General and Administrative

     6.4  
  

 

 

 

Total Operating Expense

     36.4  

Gain (Loss) From Disposal of Assets

     0.1  

Earnings From Unconsolidated Affiliates, Net of Losses

     —    
  

 

 

 

Operating Income / (Loss)

     (6.9
  

 

 

 

Financial Items & Other Income / (Expense)

  

Interest Income

     0.8  

Interest Expense

     (8.2

Reorganization Items, Net

     (45.9

Other Income (Expense), Net

     (0.4
  

 

 

 

Income Before Provision for Income Taxes

     (60.6

Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes

     1.6  
  

 

 

 

Net Income (Loss)

     (62.2

Noncontrolling Interest Expense

     0.0  
  

 

 

 

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Stockholders

   $ (62.2
  

 

 

 

Notes:

 

(1) -

Includes revenue from Affiliates, Debtor and Non-Debtor entities.

 

MOR-4    Page 7 of 11


IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

Case Name:    BRISTOW GROUP INC., et al.
Case Number:    19-32713
Petition Date:    May 11, 2019

Debtor Post-Petition Cash Receipts and Disbursements for the Month of (1) (2):

 

Cash Receipts and Disbursements (USD $ millions)

   30-Sep-19  

Operating Cash Flow

  

Total Receipts

   $ 10.9  

Total Operating Disbursements

     (28.9
  

 

 

 

Operating Cash Flow Before Intercompany

     (18.0

Net Intercompany Activity

     16.6  
  

 

 

 

Operating Cash Flow After Intercompany

     (1.4

Non-Operating Activities

  

Restructuring Professional Fees

     (1.7

US Trustee

     —    

Debt Service

     (18.4

Other Non-Operating Activities (3) (4)

     11.0  
  

 

 

 

Total Non-Operating Activities

     (9.2
  

 

 

 

Total Cash Flow

   $ (10.6
  

 

 

 

Notes:

 

(1)

On a bank cash basis excluding restricted cash.

(2)

Based on an aggregation of weekly activity from the Debtors’ 13 Week Cash Flow for the weeks ended 9/6 - 9/27.

(3)

$11.0M relates to a draw on available DIP proceeds which were used to fund general operating expenses.

(4)

Does not include $75M paydown of Senior Secured Notes using DIP proceeds held at Ankura.

 

MOR-5    Page 8 of 11


IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

Case Name:    BRISTOW GROUP INC., et al.   Petition Date: May 11, 2019
Case Number:    19-32713    

Debtor Cash Account Balances (as of September 30, 2019):

 

(USD $ millions)

              
Bank Account Balances  

Bank

   Legal
Entity #
     Legal Entity      Acct. #      Type      Balance (1)  

Wells Fargo

     1008        Bristow U.S. Leasing LLC        x6639        Operating Account      $ 0.0  

Wells Fargo

     1009        Bristow Equipmt Leasing Ltd.        x7810        Operating Account        0.0  

Wells Fargo

     1009        Bristow Equipmt Leasing Ltd.        x1020        Blocked Account        —    

Wells Fargo

     1010        Bristow Group Inc.        x1071        Controlled Disbursement Account        —    

Wells Fargo

     1010        Bristow Group Inc.        x3916        Operating Account        10.9  

Citi

     1010        Bristow Group Inc.        x5443        Interest Bearing Account        20.3  

Wells Fargo

     1010        Bristow Group Inc.        x9805        Operating Account        0.1  

Wells Fargo

     1011        Bristow U.S. LLC        x1067        Controlled Disbursement Account        —    

Wells Fargo

     1011        Bristow U.S. LLC        x3940        Operating Account        —    

Wells Fargo

     1011        Bristow U.S. LLC        x3924        Payroll Account        —    

Wells Fargo

     A111        Bristow U.S. LLC—Trinidad Branch        x1754        Branch Operating Account        0.1  

Wells Fargo

     A219        Bristow Hel. Inc.—Trinidad Branch        x1660        Branch Operating Account        —    

Wells Fargo

     A311        Bristow U.S. LLC—Norway Branch        x1645        Branch Operating Account        0.0  

Wells Fargo

     A211        Bristow U.S. LLC—Guyana Branch        x1637        Branch Operating Account        0.2  

Wells Fargo

     1013        BriLog Leasing Ltd.        x2417        Operating Account        —    

Wells Fargo

     1013        BriLog Leasing Ltd.        x4013        Operating Account        0.8  

Wells Fargo

     1019        Bristow Helicopters Inc.        x4989        Operating Account        1.0  

Wells Fargo

     A319        Bristow Helicopters Inc.        x1678        Branch Operating Account        —    

Wells Fargo

     A119        Bristow Hel Inc.—Nigeria Branch        x1652        Branch Operating Account        —    

Wells Fargo

     1042        BHNA Holdings Inc.        x5036        Operating Account        6.1  
              

 

 

 

Total Bank Account Balances

 

            $ 39.6  
           

 

 

 

 

Bank to Book Cash Reconciliation  

Cash Balances—Above

   $ 39.6  

Cash in Transit and Other Reconciling Items

     (0.5
  

 

 

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents Book Balance (MOR-2)

   $   39.1  
  

 

 

 

 

(1)

Does not include restricted cash of $148M held at Ankura.

 

MOR-6    Page 9 of 11


IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

Case Name:    BRISTOW GROUP INC., et al.
Case Number:    19-32713
Petition Date:    May 11, 2019

Post-Petition Payments To Professionals for the Month of:

 

Payments to Professionals (USD $ thousands)

   30-Sep-19     Cumulative  

Payments to Professionals

    

1   Kirkland & Ellis—Counsel to Unsecured Notes

   $ (1,084   $ (4,500

2   Davis Polk—Counsel to the Senior Secured Notes

     —         (2,998

3   Prime Clerk—Claims Agent

     —         (503

4   PJT Partners—Financial Advisor to the Senior Secured Notes

     —         (458

5   Ducera—Financial Advisor to Unsecured Notes

     (105     (429

6   Seabury—Financial Advisor to UCC

     (202     (202

7   Haynes Boone—Local Counsel (Houston)

     —         (176

8   Reevemark—Reevemark

     (55     (165

9   Levene, Neale, Bender, Yoo & Brill —Lead Counsel to Ad Hoc Equity Committee

     (87     (157

10  Shipman & Goodwin —Counsel to SSN Admin Agent (US Bank)

     (33     (106

11  Glass Ratner—FA to Ad Hoc Equity Committee

     (72     (100

12  Hunton Andrews Kurth—Counsel to Lombard

     —         (71

13  B. Riley—IB to Ad Hoc Equity Committee

     (25     (49

14  Polsinelli—Counsel to Ad Hoc Equity Committee

     (15     (36

15  Adural—Local Counsel (Panama)

     (18     (31

16  U.S. Bank—SSN Admin Agent

     (9     (18

17  NautaDutilh—Local Counsel (Amsterdam) to Ankura

     —         (18

18  Daugherty Fowler—Local Counsel (Oklahoma)

     (5     (6
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Payments to Professionals (1) (2)

   $ (1,710   $ (10,024
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Notes:

 

(1) -

Payments to ordinary course professionals are not included in MOR-7.

(2) -

Does not include $106K in fees paid to Ankura Trust Company.

 

MOR-7    Page 10 of 11


IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

Case Name:    BRISTOW GROUP INC., et al.
Case Number:    19-32713
Petition Date:    May 11, 2019

(USD $ in ones)

Total Post-Petition Disbursements By Debtor Entity (1)

 

Case #

  

Legal Entity Name

   30-Sep-19 (2)     Total  
19-32713    Bristow Group Inc.    $ (21,654,311   $ (49,152,517
19-32714    BHNA Holdings Inc.      —         —    
19-32715    BriLog Leasing Ltd.      (11,635,164     (30,203,574
19-32716    Bristow Alaska Inc.      —         —    
19-32717    Brist Equipmt Leasing LTD      (2,979,086     (14,390,522
19-32718    Bristow Helicopters Inc.      —         —    
19-32719    Bristow U.S. Leasing LLC      —         —    
19-32720    Bristow U.S. LLC      (13,000,090     (66,617,947
     

 

 

   

 

 

 
Total       $ (49,268,652   $ (160,364,561

Notes:

 

(1)

Does not include intercompany disbursements.

(2)

Does not include $75M paydown of Senior Secured Notes using DIP proceeds held at Ankura.

 

Exhibit A    Page 11 of 11