Document

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K



☑	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2019 or



☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File No. 001-36441

Investors Bancorp, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)




Delaware			46-4702118
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)			(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

101 JFK Parkway,	Short Hills,	New Jersey	07078
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)			Zip Code

(973) 924-5100

(Registrant’s telephone number)

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:



Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common	ISBC	The NASDAQ Stock Market

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☑ No ☐

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☑

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☑ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☑ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Table of Contents




Large accelerated filer	☑	Accelerated filer	☐
Non-accelerated filer	☐	Smaller reporting company	☐
		Emerging growth company	☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☑

As of February 21, 2020, the registrant had 359,070,852 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, issued and 247,401,585 shares outstanding.

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant, computed by reference to the last sale price on June 30, 2019, as reported by the NASDAQ Global Select Market, was approximately $2.84 billion.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

1. Proxy Statement for the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the registrant (Part III).

Table of Contents

INVESTORS BANCORP, INC.

2019 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS




		Page
Part I.
Item 1.	Business	1
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	33
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	41
Item 2.	Properties	41
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	41
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	41

Part II.
Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	42
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	44
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	46
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	60
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	60
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	60
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	61
Item 9B.	Other Information	61

Part III.
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	61
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	61
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	62
Item 13.	Certain Relationships, Related Transactions and Director Independence	62
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	62

Part IV.
Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	62
Item 16.	Form 10-K Summary	130
	Signature Page	131

Table of Contents

PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains a number of forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. These statements may be identified by the use of the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “outlook,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “will,” “would” and similar terms and phrases, including references to assumptions.

Forward-looking statements are based on various assumptions and analyses made by us in light of our management’s experience and its perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments, as well as other factors we believe are appropriate under the circumstances. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors (many of which are beyond our control) that could cause actual results to differ materially from future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These factors are outlined in Item 1A. Risk Factors herein and include, without limitation, the following:


•	the timing and occurrence or non-occurrence of events may be subject to circumstances beyond our control;


•	there may be increases in competitive pressure among financial institutions or from non-financial institutions;


•	changes in the interest rate environment may reduce interest margins or affect the value of our investments;


•	changes in deposit flows, loan demand or real estate values may adversely affect our business;


•	changes in accounting principles, policies or guidelines may cause our financial condition to be perceived differently;


•	general economic conditions, either nationally or locally in some or all areas in which we do business, or conditions in the real estate or securities markets or the banking industry may be less favorable than we currently anticipate;


•	legislative or regulatory changes may adversely affect our business;


•	technological changes may be more difficult or expensive than we anticipate;


•	success or consummation of new business initiatives may be more difficult or expensive than we anticipate;


•	litigation or other matters before regulatory agencies, whether currently existing or commencing in the future, may be determined adverse to us or may delay the occurrence or non-occurrence of events longer than we anticipate;


•	the risks associated with continued diversification and growth of assets and adverse changes to credit quality;


•	difficulties associated with achieving expected future financial results;


•	impact on our financial performance associated with the effective deployment of capital; and


•	the risk of an economic slowdown that would adversely affect credit quality and loan originations.

We have no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this document.

As used in this Form 10-K, “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Investors Bancorp, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiary, Investors Bank. Investors Bancorp, Inc.’s electronic filings with the SEC, including the Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to these reports filed or furnished pursuant to Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as amended, are made available at no cost in the Investor Relations section of the Company’s website, www.investorsbank.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after the Company files such material with, or furnishes it to, the SEC. The Company’s SEC filings are also available through the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

PART I



ITEM 1.	BUSINESS

Investors Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) is a Delaware corporation which became the holding company for Investors Bank (“the Bank”) in May 2014, upon the completion of the mutual-to-stock conversion of Investors Bancorp, MHC. Prior to the 2014 conversion, Investors Bancorp, MHC held 55% of Investors Bancorp’s outstanding common stock in connection with its initial public offering in October 2005, which raised net proceeds of $509.7 million. The second step conversion was completed on May 7, 2014. The Company raised net proceeds of $2.15 billion by selling a total of 219,580,695 shares of common stock at $10.00 per share in the second step stock offering and issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock and a $10.0 million cash contribution to the Investors Charitable Foundation. Concurrent with the completion of the stock offering, each share of Investors Bancorp common stock owned by public stockholders (stockholders other than Investors Bancorp, MHC) was exchanged for 2.55 shares of Company common stock. At December 31, 2019, the Company had 359,070,852 common stock issued and 247,439,902 outstanding.

The Company is subject to regulation as a bank holding company by the Federal Reserve Board. The Company neither owns nor leases any property, but instead uses the premises, equipment and furniture of the Bank. The Company currently employs as officers only certain persons who are also officers of the Bank and uses the support staff of the Bank from time to time. These

Table of Contents

persons are not separately compensated by the Company. The Company may hire additional employees, as appropriate, to the extent it expands its business in the future.

The Bank is a New Jersey-chartered commercial bank headquartered in Short Hills, New Jersey. Originally founded in 1926 as a New Jersey-chartered mutual savings and loan association, it has grown through acquisitions and internal growth, including de novo branching. In 1992, the charter was converted to a mutual savings bank and in 1997 the charter was converted to a New Jersey-chartered stock savings bank. In 2019, the charter was converted to a New Jersey-chartered commercial bank.

The Bank is in the business of attracting deposits from the public through its branch network and a secure online channel and borrowing funds in the wholesale markets to originate loans and to invest in securities. The Bank originates multi-family loans, commercial real estate loans, commercial and industrial (“C&I”) loans, one-to four- family residential mortgage loans secured by one- to four-family residential real estate, construction loans and consumer loans, the majority of which are cash surrender value lending on life insurance contracts, home equity loans and home equity lines of credit. Securities, primarily mortgage-backed securities, U.S. Government and Federal Agency obligations, and other securities represented 14.4% of consolidated assets at December 31, 2019. The Bank is subject to comprehensive regulation and examination by the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance (“NJDOBI”), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”).

Our Business Strategy

Since the Company’s initial public offering in 2005, we have transitioned from a wholesale thrift business to a retail commercial bank. This transition has been primarily accomplished by increasing the amount of our commercial loans and core deposits (savings, checking and money market accounts). Our transformation can be attributed to a number of factors, including organic growth, de novo branch openings, bank and branch acquisitions, as well as product expansion. We believe the attractive markets we operate in, namely, New Jersey and the greater New York metropolitan area, will continue to provide us with growth opportunities. In addition, the Bank has national exposure through our Investors eAccess online deposit platform and our equipment finance, healthcare and leveraged lending portfolios. Our primary focus is to build and develop profitable customer relationships across all lines of business, both consumer and commercial.

Opportunities through Our Attractive Markets

The primary markets in which we have a retail presence are considered attractive banking markets within the United States, and we believe they will continue to provide us with opportunities to grow. We have expanded our retail franchise to include the suburbs of Philadelphia and the boroughs of New York City as well as Nassau and Suffolk Counties on Long Island. Additionally, we have strengthened our presence in our historic markets throughout New Jersey. We accomplished this expansion through de novo growth and select bank and branch acquisitions. As a result of this growth, the Bank is the largest bank headquartered in the state of New Jersey as measured by New Jersey deposits as of June 30, 2019. The markets in which we operate are desirable from an economic and demographic perspective as they are characterized by large and dense population centers, areas of high income households and centers of robust business and commercial activity. Our competition in these markets tends to be from out-of-state headquartered money centers and super-regional financial institutions as well as smaller, local community banks. We believe that as a locally headquartered institution, situated between these extremes, we can compete and capitalize on opportunities that exist in our market area. We continue to examine our branch network to optimize our market presence, which may include branch rationalization plans.

Many of the counties we serve are projected to experience moderate to strong household income growth through 2025. Though slower population growth is projected for many of the counties we serve, it is important to note that these counties are densely populated. All of the counties we serve have a strong mature market and nearly all have median household incomes greater than the national median.

We face intense competition in making loans as well as attracting deposits in our market area. Our competition for loans and deposits comes principally from commercial banks, savings institutions, mortgage banking firms, credit unions, insurance companies and new technology-driven market entrants. We face additional competition for deposits from short-term money market funds, brokerage firms and mutual funds. Some of our competitors offer products and services that we currently do not offer, such as trust services and private banking. As of June 30, 2019, the latest date for which statistics are available, our market share of deposits was ranked in the top 10 of total deposits in the State of New Jersey and in the top 20 within the New York metropolitan area for all institutions.

Diversifying the Loan Portfolio

To further diversify our loan portfolio, we have increased C&I lending by building relationships with small to medium sized companies. In recent years, we have hired a number of experienced C&I lending teams, including a team specializing in the healthcare industry, and in 2018, we acquired an equipment finance team and portfolio. For the year ended December 31, 2019, we originated $1.27 billion in C&I loans. A significant portion of our C&I loans are secured by commercial real estate and

Table of Contents

are primarily on properties and businesses located in New Jersey and New York. Our Equipment Finance Group originates equipment finance loans and leases which are primarily secured by critical use assets. We have diversified our loan portfolio, as evidenced by the fact that C&I loans represent approximately 14% of our loan portfolio at December 31, 2019 as compared to December 31, 2015, when C&I loans were approximately 6% of total loans. Diversifying our loan portfolio will continue to be a major focus of our business strategy going forward, however, we are mindful of concentrations as it pertains to capital.

Deposit Strategy

We are focused on generating relationship-based core deposits (savings, checking and money market accounts). As of December 31, 2019, we had core deposits of $13.85 billion, representing approximately 78% of total deposits. Core deposits are an attractive funding alternative because they are generally a more stable source of low cost funding and are less sensitive to changes in market interest rates. The percent of non-interest bearing deposits to total deposits has grown to 14% at December 31, 2019. Despite intense competition for deposits, we will continue to pursue a customer-centric model to meeting their financial needs and continue to invest in branch staff training, product development, de novo branch growth based on existing market presence, as well as commercial deposit gathering efforts. Over the past few years we have developed a suite of commercial deposit and treasury management products, designed to appeal to small and mid-sized businesses and non-profit organizations including electronic deposit services such as mobile and remote deposit capture.

Our deposit business has become more commercial oriented over the past few years as we attract more deposits from commercial entities, including businesses that borrow from us. The Bank is one of the largest depositories for government and municipal deposits in New Jersey, which provides us with an additional funding source. Our branch network, concentrated in markets with attractive demographics and a high-density population, will continue to provide us with opportunities to grow and improve our deposit base.

Digital Capabilities and Strategy

In addition to our branch network, we offer online banking capabilities for consumers and small businesses. During 2019, we launched Investors eAccess, a secure online channel to attract consumer deposits nationwide, and enhanced our mobile and online banking services which allow us to serve our customers’ needs in an omnichannel environment. Several improvements were made throughout the year, including the launch of Zelle^® for real-time person to person payments, the ability to view personal credit scores, and enhancements to online alerts. We also deployed Small Business Online Banking along with improvements to our Commercial Online Banking experience, including more robust online treasury management services.

In addition to our deposit-related digital capabilities, we continue to enhance our digital capabilities related to originating and servicing loans. We have partnered with ODX, a leading digital small business originations platform, to streamline our small business lending process. We continue to enhance our digital capabilities as a way to enhance the customer experience and deliver our products and services in a safe and secure manner.

Acquisitions

A significant portion of our historic growth can be attributed to our acquisition strategy. Although management evaluates a number of factors when considering an acquisition, we have maintained a fundamental focus on preserving tangible book value per share. Acquisitions have provided us with the opportunity to grow our business, expand our geographic footprint and improve our financial performance. We intend to continue to evaluate potential acquisition opportunities that may present themselves in the future while maintaining the financial and pricing discipline that we have adhered to in the past.

On February 2, 2018, we completed the acquisition of a $345.8 million equipment finance portfolio. The acquisition included a seven-person team of financing professionals to lead our Equipment Finance Group, which is a part of our commercial lending group and is classified within our C&I loan portfolio.

On July 24, 2019, we signed a definitive merger agreement with Gold Coast Bancorp, Inc. (“Gold Coast Bancorp”) under which we will acquire Gold Coast Bancorp. Gold Coast Bancorp, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Gold Coast Bank, operates six branches in Nassau and Suffolk counties in suburban Long Island and one branch in Brooklyn, NY. The merger was approved by shareholders of Gold Coast Bancorp on December 16, 2019. Completion of the merger is awaiting receipt of all regulatory approvals.

Capital Management

Capital management is a key component of our business strategy. We raised net proceeds of $2.15 billion in equity in May 2014 upon the completion of the second step mutual conversion. As of December 31, 2019, our tangible equity to asset ratio was 9.49%. Since our second step, we have managed our capital through a combination of organic growth, stock repurchases and dividends.

Table of Contents

In December 2019, we entered into a purchase and sale agreement with Blue Harbour Group, L.P. (“Blue Harbour”), pursuant to which we repurchased from Blue Harbour the 27,318,628 shares of our common stock beneficially owned by Blue Harbour, at a purchase price of $12.29 per share, representing aggregate cost of approximately $335.7 million. Blue Harbour had been our largest shareholder for several years prior to this share repurchase. This share repurchase was outside of, and did not count toward, our existing share repurchase program.

Since commencing our first share repurchase program in March 2015, we have repurchased 127.1 million shares totaling $1.54 billion at an average price per share of $12.11, inclusive of the Blue Harbour transaction.

Beginning in September of 2012, we began to pay a quarterly cash dividend of $0.02 per share. For the year ended December 31, 2019, our dividend payout ratio per share was approximately 59%. We have recently increased our quarterly dividend to $0.12 per share.

Involvement in Our Communities

The Bank proudly promotes a higher quality of life in the communities it serves in New Jersey and New York through employee volunteer efforts and our Charitable Foundations. Employees are continually encouraged to become leaders in their communities and use the Bank’s support to help others. Through the Investors Charitable Foundation, established in 2005, and the Roma Charitable Foundation, which we acquired in December 2013, the Bank has contributed or committed $39.7 million in donations to enrich the lives of New Jersey and New York citizens by supporting initiatives in the arts, education, youth development, affordable housing, financial education, and health and human services.

Community involvement is one of the principal values of the Bank and provides our staff with a meaningful ability to help others. We believe these efforts contribute to creating a culture at the Bank that promotes high employee morale while enhancing the presence of the Bank in our local markets. We continue to look for opportunities to help the communities we serve.

Lending Activities

Our loan portfolio is comprised of multi-family loans, commercial real estate loans, C&I loans, construction loans, residential mortgage loans and consumer and other loans. At December 31, 2019, multi-family loans totaled $7.81 billion, or 36.0% of our total loan portfolio, commercial real estate loans totaled $4.83 billion, or 22.3% of our total loan portfolio, C&I loans totaled $2.95 billion, or 13.6% of our total loan portfolio, and construction loans totaled $262.9 million, or 1.2% of our total loan portfolio. Residential mortgage loans represented $5.14 billion, or 23.7% of our total loans at December 31, 2019. We also offer consumer loans, which consist primarily of cash surrender value lending on life insurance contracts, home equity loans and home equity lines of credit. At December 31, 2019, consumer and other loans totaled $699.8 million, or 3.2% of our total loan portfolio.

Table of Contents

Loan Portfolio Composition. The following table sets forth the composition of our loan portfolio by type of loan. Commercial loans are comprised of multi-family loans, commercial real estate loans, C&I loans and construction loans. Our primary focus over recent years has been on the origination of commercial loans.



	December 31,
	2019					2018					2017					2016					2015
	Amount			%		Amount			%		Amount			%		Amount			%		Amount			%
	(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial loans:
Multi-family loans	$	7,813,236		36.0	%	$	8,165,187		37.7	%	$	7,802,835		38.8	%	$	7,459,131		39.6	%	$	6,255,904		37.0	%
Commercial real estate loans	4,831,347			22.3		4,786,825			22.1		4,548,101			22.6		4,452,300			23.7		3,829,099			22.7
Commercial and industrial loans	2,951,306			13.6		2,389,756			11.1		1,625,375			8.1		1,275,283			6.8		1,044,385			6.2
Construction loans	262,866			1.2		227,015			1.1		416,883			2.1		314,843			1.7		225,843			1.3
Total commercial loans	15,858,755			73.1		15,568,783			72.0		14,393,194			71.6		13,501,557			71.8		11,355,231			67.2
Residential mortgage loans	5,144,718			23.7		5,351,115			24.8		5,026,517			25.0		4,711,880			25.0		5,039,543			29.8
Consumer and other loans:
Cash surrender value	370,245			1.7		344,628			1.6		279,355			1.4		191,949			1.0		75,136			0.5
Home equity credit lines	226,136			1.0		246,198			1.1		251,654			1.3		240,518			1.3		220,357			1.3
Home equity loans	101,332			0.5		114,207			0.5		137,964			0.7		161,356			0.9		201,063			1.2
Other	2,083			0.0		2,833			0.0		2,164			0.0		3,442			0.0		—			0.0
Total consumer and other loans	699,796			3.2		707,866			3.2		671,137			3.4		597,265			3.2		496,556			3.0
Total loans	$	21,703,269		100.0	%	$	21,627,764		100.0	%	$	20,090,848		100.0	%	$	18,810,702		100.0	%	$	16,891,330		100.0	%
Deferred fees, premiums and other, net ⁽¹⁾	907					(13,811		)			(7,778		)			(12,474		)			(11,692		)
Allowance for loan losses	(228,120		)			(235,817		)			(230,969		)			(228,373		)			(218,505		)
Net loans	$	21,476,056				$	21,378,136				$	19,852,101				$	18,569,855				$	16,661,133

(1) Included in deferred fees and premiums are accretable purchase accounting adjustments in connection with loans acquired and an adjustment to the carrying amount of the residential loans hedged.

Table of Contents

Portfolio Maturities. The following table summarizes the scheduled repayments of our loan portfolio based on contractual maturity or next repricing date, including PCI loans at December 31, 2019. Overdraft loans are reported as being due in one year or less.



	At December 31, 2019
	Multi-Family Loans		Commercial Real Estate Loans		Commercial and Industrial Loans		Construction Loans		Residential Mortgage Loans		Consumer and Other Loans		Total
	(In thousands)
Amounts Due:
One year or less	$	595,561	$	513,044	$	760,984	$	247,595	$	309,036	$	139,429	$	2,565,649
After one year:
One to three years	2,014,823		1,107,274		411,147		15,271		248,569		175,311		3,972,395
Three to five years	2,528,273		1,538,109		599,243		—		343,463		123,557		5,132,645
Five to ten years	2,512,883		1,393,851		882,788		—		903,161		49,157		5,741,840
Ten to twenty years	161,696		279,069		260,152		—		759,411		68,020		1,528,348
Over twenty years	—		—		36,992		—		2,581,078		144,322		2,762,392
Total due after one year	7,217,675		4,318,303		2,190,322		15,271		4,835,682		560,367		19,137,620
Total loans	$	7,813,236	$	4,831,347	$	2,951,306	$	262,866	$	5,144,718	$	699,796	$	21,703,269
Deferred fees, premiums and other, net													907
Allowance for loan losses													(228,120		)
Net loans													$	21,476,056

The following table sets forth fixed- and adjustable-rate loans at December 31, 2019 that are contractually due after December 31, 2020.



	Due After December 31, 2020
	Fixed		Adjustable		Total
	(In thousands)
Commercial loans:
Multi-family loans	$	2,646,908	$	4,570,767	$	7,217,675
Commercial real estate loans	1,489,308		2,828,995		4,318,303
Commercial and industrial loans	1,655,724		534,598		2,190,322
Construction loans	15,271		—		15,271
Total commercial loans	5,807,211		7,934,360		13,741,571
Residential mortgage loans	3,677,154		1,158,528		4,835,682
Consumer and other loans:
Cash surrender value	—		281,272		281,272
Home equity credit lines	—		180,278		180,278
Home equity loans	97,905		—		97,905
Other	912		—		912
Total consumer and other loans	98,817		461,550		560,367
Total loans	$	9,583,182	$	9,554,438	$	19,137,620

Multi-family Loans. At December 31, 2019, $7.81 billion, or 36.0%, of our total loan portfolio was comprised of multi-family loans. Our policy generally has been to originate multi-family loans in New York, New Jersey and surrounding states. The multi-family loans in our portfolio consist of both fixed-rate and adjustable-rate loans, which were originated at prevailing market rates. Multi-family loans are generally five to fifteen year term balloon loans amortized over fifteen to thirty years.

Commercial Real Estate Loans. At December 31, 2019, $4.83 billion, or 22.3%, of our total loan portfolio was commercial real estate loans. We originate commercial real estate loans in New Jersey, New York and surrounding states, which are secured by industrial properties, retail buildings, office buildings and other commercial properties. Commercial real estate loans in our

Table of Contents

portfolio consist of both fixed-rate and adjustable-rate loans which were originated at prevailing market rates. Commercial real estate loans are generally five to fifteen year term balloon loans amortized over fifteen to thirty years.

Commercial and Industrial Loans. At December 31, 2019, $2.95 billion, or 13.6%, of our total loan portfolio were classified as C&I loans. We offer a wide range of credit facilities to C&I clients throughout our geographic footprint and nationally. Our credit offerings are lines of credit, fixed-rate and adjustable-rate term loans, lease financing and letters of credit. A significant portion of our C&I loans are secured by commercial real estate and are primarily properties and businesses located in New Jersey and New York. Other collateral for these types of loans can be comprised of real estate, equipment and/or a lien on the general assets, including inventory and receivables of the underlying business, and in many cases are further supported by a personal guarantee of the owner. As the Company has grown, we have broadened our product offerings to create certain C&I lending subspecialties that originate loans both locally and nationally, including leveraged lending and expanded lending to the healthcare industry. In addition, in February 2018, we completed the acquisition of a $345.8 million equipment finance portfolio, comprised of both loans and leases throughout the U.S., which is classified within our C&I portfolio and are primarily secured by critical use assets. In connection with the acquisition, we launched an Equipment Finance Group within our C&I team. Our equipment finance portfolio totaled $644.7 million, or 22% of our C&I portfolio at December 31, 2019. At December 31, 2019, approximately 31% of our C&I loans were to borrowers outside of New Jersey and New York.

Construction Loans. At December 31, 2019, we held $262.9 million in construction loans representing 1.2% of our total loan portfolio. We offer loans directly to owners and developers on income-producing properties and residential for-sale housing units. Generally, construction loans are structured to have a three-year term and are made in amounts of up to 70% of the appraised value of the completed property, or a maximum up to the cost of the improvements. Funds are disbursed based on inspections in accordance with a schedule reflecting the completion of portions of the project. Construction financing for units to be sold require a pre-sale contract or we will limit the amount of speculative building without a sales contract.

Residential Mortgage Loans. At December 31, 2019, $5.14 billion, or 23.7%, of our loan portfolio consisted of residential mortgage loans. We originate residential mortgage loans for our loan portfolio and for sale to third parties. We have also purchased mortgage loans from correspondent entities including other banks and mortgage brokers but no longer purchase such loans. Our agreements called for these correspondent entities to originate loans that adhere to our underwriting standards. In most cases, we acquired the loans with servicing rights.

We offer various loan programs to provide financing for low-and moderate-income home buyers, some of which include down payment assistance for home purchases. Through these programs, qualified individuals receive a reduced rate of interest on most of our loan programs and have their application fee refunded at closing, as well as other incentives if certain conditions are met.

Consumer and Other Loans. At December 31, 2019, consumer loans totaled $699.8 million, or 3.2% of our total loan portfolio. We offer consumer loans, most of which consist of cash surrender value lending on life insurance contracts, home equity loans and home equity lines of credit. At December 31, 2019, cash surrender value loans totaled $370.2 million, or 53% of consumer and other loans. Acceptable credit history and FICO scores are reviewed along with the evaluation of the financial rating of the insurance carrier. Home equity loans and home equity lines of credit are secured by residences primarily located in New Jersey and New York. Home equity loans are offered with fixed rates of interest, with terms generally up to 20 years and to a maximum of $750,000. Home equity lines of credit have adjustable rates of interest, indexed to the prime rate.

Loan Originations and Purchases. The following table shows our loan originations, loan purchases and repayment activities with respect to our portfolio of loans receivable for the periods indicated. Origination, sale and repayment activities with respect to our loans-held-for-sale are excluded from the table.

Table of Contents



	Years Ended December 31,
	2019			2018			2017
	(In thousands)
Loan originations and purchases
Loan originations:
Commercial loans:
Multi-family loans	$	793,611		$	1,583,196		$	1,164,910
Commercial real estate loans	861,040			801,784			705,107
Commercial and industrial loans	1,271,773			957,722			663,433
Construction loans	69,790			104,530			414,183
Total commercial loans	2,996,214			3,447,232			2,947,633
Residential mortgage loans	462,618			593,642			516,532
Consumer and other loans:
Cash surrender value	41,692			69,277			79,717
Home equity credit lines	22,704			31,184			36,505
Home equity loans	11,772			9,993			16,781
Total consumer and other loans	76,168			110,454			133,003
Total loan originations	3,535,000			4,151,328			3,597,168
Loan purchases:
Commercial loans:
Commercial real estate loans	19,681			—			—
Commercial and industrial loans	113,308			66,072			—
Total commercial loans	132,989			66,072			—
Residential mortgage loans	294,064			447,968			540,898
Total loan purchases	427,053			514,040			540,898
Loans sold	(220,069		)	—			(48,099		)
Principal repayments	(3,658,317		)	(3,472,097		)	(2,809,630		)
Other items, net ⁽¹⁾	14,254			2,017			1,909
Net loans acquired in acquisition	—			330,747			—
Net increase in loan portfolio	$	97,921		$	1,526,035		$	1,282,246

(1) Other items include charge-offs and recoveries, impairment write-downs, loan loss provisions, loans transferred to other real estate owned, amortization and accretion of deferred fees and costs, discounts and premiums, purchase accounting adjustments, and an adjustment to the carrying amount of the residential loans hedged.

Credit Policy and Procedures

Loan Approval Procedures and Authority. The credit approval process provides for prompt and thorough underwriting and approval or decline of loan requests. The approval method used is a hierarchy of individual credit authorities for new credit requests and renewals according to the Bank’s credit policies. All commercial credit actions require a total of two signatures, one from the Bank’s business line and one from the Bank’s credit risk management group. Transactions exceeding certain thresholds are submitted to the Bank’s Credit Approval Committee for decision. Consumer and small business transactions are underwritten according to guidelines and policy approved by the Credit Risk Committee. Any exceptions are approved by a credit risk officer. Our credit authority standards and limits are reviewed periodically by the Board of Directors. Approval limits are established on criteria such as the risk associated with each credit action, amount, and aggregate credit exposure of a borrower. The Bank’s Credit Risk Committee approves authorities for lending and credit personnel. Credit authorities are based on position, capability, and experience of the individuals.

Loans to One Borrower. The Bank’s regulatory limit on total loans to any one borrower or attributed to any one borrower is 15% of unimpaired capital and surplus. As of December 31, 2019, the regulatory lending limit was $363.9 million. The Bank’s internal policy limit is $150.0 million, with exceptions to this policy communicated to the Board of Directors. The Bank reviews these group exposures on a regular basis. The Bank also sets additional limits on size of loans by loan type. At December 31, 2019, there were two relationships that exceeded the internal limit totaling $326.4 million. Both were communicated to the Board of Directors and were performing in accordance with their contractual terms as of December 31, 2019.

Table of Contents

Asset Quality. One of the Bank’s key operating objectives has been, and continues to be, maintaining a high level of asset quality. The Bank maintains sound credit standards for new loan originations and purchases. We do not originate or purchase sub-prime loans, negative amortization loans or option ARM loans. Our portfolio contains interest-only and no income verification residential mortgage loans. At December 31, 2019, interest-only residential and consumer loans totaled $28.3 million, which represented less than 1% of the residential and consumer portfolio. We no longer originate residential mortgage loans without verifying income. At December 31, 2019, these loans totaled $143.1 million. From time to time and for competitive purposes, we originate interest-only commercial real estate and multi-family loans. At December 31, 2019, these loans totaled $1.23 billion. As part of its underwriting, these loans are evaluated as fully amortizing for risk classification purposes, with the interest-only period ranging from one to ten years. In addition, the Company evaluates its policy limits on a regular basis. We believe these criteria adequately control the potential risks of such loans and that adequate provisions for loan losses are provided for all known and inherent risks.

The underlying credit quality of our loan portfolio is dependent primarily on each borrower’s continued ability to make required loan payments and, in the event a borrower is unable to do so, is dependent on the value of the collateral securing the loan, if any. A borrower’s ability to pay is typically dependent on employment and other sources of income in the case of one-to four-family mortgage loans and consumer loans. In the case of multi-family and commercial real estate loans, repayment is dependent on the cash flow generated by the property; in the case of C&I loans, on the cash flows generated by the business, which in turn is impacted by general economic conditions. Other factors, such as unanticipated expenditures or changes in the financial markets, may also impact a borrower’s ability to pay. Collateral values, particularly real estate values, may also be impacted by a variety of factors including general economic conditions, demographics, maintenance and collection or foreclosure delays.

Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans. Purchased Credit-Impaired (“PCI”) loans are loans acquired at a discount, due in part to credit quality. PCI loans are accounted for in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Subtopic 310-30, “Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality” and are initially recorded at fair value (as determined by the present value of expected future cash flows) with no valuation allowance (i.e., the allowance for loan losses). As of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, PCI loans totaled $4.1 million and $4.5 million, respectively.

Table of Contents

Delinquent Loans. The following table sets forth our loan delinquencies by type and by amount at the dates indicated, excluding loans classified as PCI.



	Loans Delinquent For
	60-89 Days			90 Days and Over			Total
	Number	Amount		Number	Amount		Number	Amount
	(Dollars in thousands)
At December 31, 2019
Commercial loans:
Multi-family loans	1	$	1,946	6	$	22,055	7	$	24,001
Commercial real estate loans	1	525		6	3,787		7	4,312
Commercial and industrial loans	7	2,767		11	5,053		18	7,820
Construction loans	—	—		—	—		—	—
Total commercial loans	9	5,238		23	30,895		32	36,133
Residential mortgage loans	28	6,195		118	27,628		146	33,823
Consumer and other loans	10	1,174		25	1,299		35	2,473
Total	47	$	12,607	166	$	59,822	213	$	72,429

At December 31, 2018
Commercial loans:
Multi-family loans	1	$	2,572	13	$	33,683	14	$	36,255
Commercial real estate loans	2	3,511		13	2,415		15	5,926
Commercial and industrial loans	5	867		7	4,560		12	5,427
Construction loans	—	—		1	227		1	227
Total commercial loans	8	6,950		34	40,885		42	47,835
Residential mortgage loans	31	7,712		168	39,255		199	46,967
Consumer and other loans	8	1,650		43	2,830		51	4,480
Total	47	$	16,312	245	$	82,970	292	$	99,282

Non-Performing Assets. Non-performing assets include loans delinquent 90 days or more, non-accrual loans, performing troubled debt restructurings and real estate owned, and excludes PCI loans. Loans are classified as non-accrual when they are delinquent 90 days or more or if management has specific information that it is probable they will not collect all amounts due under the contractual terms of the loan agreement. We did not have any loans delinquent 90 days or more and still accruing interest at December 31, 2019 and 2018. Non-accrual loans decreased by $29.7 million to $95.2 million at December 31, 2019 from $124.9 million at December 31, 2018. Included in the amount of non-accrual loans at December 31, 2019 were $4.1 million of commercial real estate loans, $3.8 million of C&I loans and $1.3 million of multi-family loans that were classified as non-accrual which were performing in accordance with their contractual terms. Included in the amount of non-accrual loans at December 31, 2018 were $7.1 million of commercial real estate loans and $4.2 million of commercial and industrial loans that were classified as non-accrual which were performing in accordance with their contractual terms. During 2019, the Company sold $173,000 of non-performing commercial real estate loans, resulting in $29,000 of additional charge-offs. There were no sales of non-performing loans during 2018.

The ratio of non-accrual loans to total loans decreased to 0.44% at December 31, 2019 from 0.58% at December 31, 2018. Our ratio of non-performing assets to total assets decreased to 0.46% at December 31, 2019 from 0.55% at December 31, 2018. The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total non-accrual loans increased to 239.66% at December 31, 2019 from 188.78% at December 31, 2018. For further discussion of our non-performing assets and non-performing loans and the allowance for loan losses, see Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” The table below sets forth the amounts and categories of our non-performing assets excluding PCI loans at the dates indicated.

Table of Contents



	December 31,
	2019			2018			2017			2016			2015
				(Dollars in thousands)
Non-accrual loans:
Multi-family loans	$	23,322		$	33,940		$	14,978		$	482		$	3,467
Commercial real estate loans	11,945			12,391			34,043			9,205			10,820
Commercial and industrial loans	12,481			19,394			9,989			4,659			9,225
Construction loans	—			227			295			—			792
Total commercial loans	47,748			65,952			59,305			14,346			24,304
Residential mortgage loans	45,526			55,612			70,220			72,593			81,816
Consumer and other loans	1,909			3,349			6,202			7,335			9,306
Total non-accrual loans	95,183			124,913			135,727			94,274			115,426
Real estate owned and other repossessed assets	13,538			6,911			5,830			4,492			6,283
Performing troubled debt restructurings	13,084			13,620			10,957			9,445			22,489
Total non-performing assets	$	121,805		$	145,444		$	152,514		$	108,211		$	144,198
Total non-accrual loans to total loans	0.44		%	0.58		%	0.68		%	0.50		%	0.68		%
Total non-performing assets to total assets	0.46		%	0.55		%	0.61		%	0.47		%	0.69		%

At December 31, 2019, there were $36.6 million of loans deemed troubled debt restructured loans, of which $13.1 million were classified as accruing and $23.5 million were classified as non-accrual. For the year ended December 31, 2019, interest income that would have been recorded had our non-accruing loans been current in accordance with their original terms amounted to $3.6 million. We recognized interest income of $1.5 million on such loans for the year ended December 31, 2019.

Other Real Estate Owned and Other Repossessed Assets. Real estate and other assets we acquire as a result of foreclosure, by deed in lieu of foreclosure or repossession are classified as other real estate owned and other repossessed assets until sold. When property is acquired it is recorded at fair value at the date of foreclosure or repossession less estimated costs to sell the property. Holding costs and declines in fair value result in charges to expense after acquisition. At December 31, 2019, we had other real estate owned and other repossessed assets of $13.5 million consisting of 23 residential properties and 99 pieces of industrial equipment.

Classified Assets. Federal regulations provide that loans and other assets of lesser quality should be classified as “substandard,” “doubtful” or “loss” assets. An asset is considered “substandard” if it is inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or by the collateral pledged, if any. “Substandard” assets include those characterized by the distinct possibility we will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. An asset classified as “doubtful” has all the weaknesses inherent in one classified substandard with the added characteristic the weaknesses present make collection or liquidation in full highly questionable and improbable. An asset classified as “loss” is considered uncollectible and of such little value that its continuance on the institution’s books as an asset, without the establishment of a specific valuation allowance or charge-off, is not warranted. We classify an asset as “special mention” if the asset has potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or in the institution’s credit position at some future date. Special mention assets are not adversely classified and do not expose an institution to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification.

We are required to establish an allowance for loan losses in an amount that management considers prudent for loans classified substandard or doubtful, as well as for other problem loans. General allowances represent loss allowances, which have been established to recognize the inherent losses associated with lending activities, but which, unlike specific allowances, have not been allocated to particular problem assets. When we classify problem assets as “loss,” we are required either to establish a specific allowance for losses equal to 100% of the amount of the asset so classified or to charge off such amount. Our determination as to the classification of our assets and the amount of our valuation allowances is subject to review by the NJDOBI and the FDIC, which can require that we establish additional general or specific loss allowances.

We review the loan portfolio on a quarterly basis to determine whether any loans require classification in accordance with applicable regulations. Not all classified assets constitute non-performing assets.

Impaired Loans. The Company defines an impaired loan as a loan for which it is probable, based on current information, that the lender will not collect all amounts due under the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The Company evaluates commercial loans with an outstanding balance greater than $1.0 million and on non-accrual status, loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”), and other commercial loans with an outstanding balance greater than $1.0 million if management has

Table of Contents

specific information that it is probable they will not collect all amounts due under the contractual terms of the loan agreement for impairment. Impaired loans are individually evaluated to determine that the loan’s carrying value is not in excess of the fair value of the collateral or the present value of the expected future cash flows. Smaller balance homogeneous loans are evaluated for impairment collectively unless they are modified in a TDR. Such loans include residential mortgage loans, consumer loans, and loans not meeting the Company’s definition of impaired, and are specifically excluded from impaired loans. At December 31, 2019, loans meeting the Company’s definition of an impaired loan totaled $69.5 million. The allowance for loan losses related to loans classified as impaired at December 31, 2019, amounted to $1.8 million. Interest income received during the year ended December 31, 2019 on loans classified as impaired totaled $1.0 million. For further detail on our impaired loans, see Note 1 and Note 5 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 15 - Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.”

Allowance for Loan Losses

Our allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level necessary to absorb loan losses that are both probable and reasonably estimable. In determining the allowance for loan losses, management considers the losses inherent in our loan portfolio and changes in the nature and volume of loan activities, along with the general economic and real estate market conditions. A description of our methodology in establishing our allowance for loan losses is set forth in the section “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Policies — Allowance for Loan Losses.” The allowance for loan losses as of December 31, 2019 is maintained at a level that represents management’s best estimate of losses inherent in the loan portfolio. However, this analysis process is inherently subjective, as it requires us to make estimates that may be susceptible to significant revisions based upon changes in economic and real estate market conditions. Although we believe we have established and maintained the allowance for loan losses at adequate levels, additions may be necessary if the current economic environment deteriorates.

As an integral part of their examination processes, the NJDOBI and the FDIC will periodically review our allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require us to recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination.

Table of Contents

Allowance for Loan Losses. The following table sets forth activity in our allowance for loan losses for the periods indicated.



	Years Ended December 31,
	2019			2018			2017			2016			2015
	(Dollars in thousands)
Allowance balance (beginning of period)	$	235,817		$	230,969		$	228,373		$	218,505		$	200,284
Provision for loan losses	(1,000		)	12,000			16,250			19,750			26,000
Charge-offs:
Multi-family loans	(2,973		)	(2,603		)	(6		)	(161		)	(284		)
Commercial real estate loans	(151		)	(7,200		)	(8,072		)	(455		)	(1,021		)
Commercial and industrial loans	(6,833		)	(7,078		)	(5,656		)	(4,485		)	(516		)
Construction loans	—			—			(100		)	(52		)	(466		)
Residential mortgage loans	(2,241		)	(5,246		)	(4,875		)	(9,425		)	(9,526		)
Consumer and other loans	(934		)	(1,963		)	(500		)	(419		)	(403		)
Total charge-offs	(13,132		)	(24,090		)	(19,209		)	(14,997		)	(12,216		)
Recoveries:
Multi-family loans	1,244			17			1,677			1,885			445
Commercial real estate loans	2,204			5,213			549			689			807
Commercial and industrial loans	1,203			9,478			200			541			295
Construction loans	—			—			—			267			317
Residential mortgage loans	1,448			2,193			2,816			1,631			2,295
Consumer and other loans	336			37			313			102			278
Total recoveries	6,435			16,938			5,555			5,115			4,437
Net charge-offs	(6,697		)	(7,152		)	(13,654		)	(9,882		)	(7,779		)
Allowance balance (end of period)	$	228,120		$	235,817		$	230,969		$	228,373		$	218,505
Total loans outstanding	$	21,703,269		$	21,627,764		$	20,090,848		$	18,810,702		$	16,891,330
Average loans outstanding	21,576,829			20,498,857			19,414,842			17,479,932			15,716,010
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of total loans outstanding	1.05		%	1.09		%	1.15		%	1.21		%	1.29		%
Net loans charged off as a percent of average loans outstanding	0.03		%	0.03		%	0.07		%	0.06		%	0.05		%
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans ⁽¹⁾	210.70		%	170.22		%	157.46		%	220.18		%	158.43		%

(1) Non-performing loans include non-accrual loans and performing TDRs.

Table of Contents

Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses. The following table sets forth the allowance for loan losses allocated by loan category and the percent of loans in each category to total loans at the dates indicated. The allowance for loan losses allocated to each category is not necessarily indicative of future losses in any particular category and does not restrict the use of the allowance to absorb losses in other categories.



	December 31,
	2019				2018				2017				2016				2015
	Allowance for Loan Losses		Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans		Allowance for Loan Losses		Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans		Allowance for Loan Losses		Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans		Allowance for Loan Losses		Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans		Allowance for Loan Losses		Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans
	(Dollars in thousands)
End of period allocated to:
Multi-family loans	$	74,099	36.0	%	$	82,876	37.7	%	$	81,469	38.9	%	$	95,561	39.6	%	$	88,223	37.0	%
Commercial real estate loans	50,925		22.3		48,449		22.1		56,137		22.6		52,796		23.7		46,999		22.7
Commercial and industrial loans	74,396		13.6		71,084		11.1		54,563		8.1		43,492		6.8		40,585		6.2
Construction loans	6,816		1.2		7,486		1.1		11,609		2.1		11,653		1.7		6,794		1.3
Residential mortgage loans	17,391		23.7		20,776		24.7		21,835		25.0		19,831		25.0		31,443		29.8
Consumer and other loans	2,548		3.2		3,102		3.3		3,099		3.3		2,850		3.2		3,155		2.9
Unallocated	1,945				2,044				2,257				2,190				1,306
Total allowance	$	228,120	100.0	%	$	235,817	100.0	%	$	230,969	100.0	%	$	228,373	100.0	%	$	218,505	100.0	%

Securities

The Board of Directors has adopted our Investment Policy. This policy determines the types of securities in which we may invest. The Investment Policy is reviewed annually by management and changes to the policy are recommended to and subject to approval by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors delegates operational responsibility for the implementation of the Investment Policy to the Asset Liability Committee, which is primarily comprised of senior officers. While general investment strategies are developed by the Asset Liability Committee, the execution of specific actions rests primarily with our Treasurer. The Treasurer is responsible for ensuring the guidelines and requirements included in the Investment Policy are followed and all securities are considered prudent for investment. Investment transactions are reviewed and ratified by the Board of Directors at their regularly scheduled meetings.

Our Investment Policy requires that investment transactions conform to Federal and State investment regulations. Our investments purchased may include, but are not limited to, U.S. Treasury obligations, securities issued by various Federal Agencies, State and Municipal subdivisions, mortgage-backed securities, certain certificates of deposit of insured financial institutions, overnight and short-term loans to other banks, investment grade corporate debt instruments, and mutual funds. In addition, the Company may invest in equity securities subject to certain limitations.

The Investment Policy requires that securities transactions be conducted in a safe and sound manner. Purchase and sale decisions are based upon a thorough pre-purchase analysis of each instrument to determine if it conforms to our overall asset/liability management objectives. The analysis must consider its effect on our risk-based capital measurement, prospects for yield and/or appreciation and other risk factors.

In December 2013, regulatory agencies adopted a rule on the treatment of certain collateralized debt obligations backed by trust preferred securities to implement sections of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), known as the Volcker Rule. At December 31, 2019, none of our securities were deemed to be a covered fund under the Volcker Rule.

Table of Contents

At December 31, 2019, our securities portfolio totaled $3.85 billion representing 14.4% of our total assets. At December 31, 2019, equity securities totaled $6.0 million and reported at fair value. Debt securities are classified as held-to-maturity or available-for-sale when purchased. At December 31, 2019, $1.15 billion of our debt securities were classified as held-to-maturity and reported at amortized cost and $2.70 billion were classified as available-for-sale and reported at fair value.

Mortgage-Backed Securities. We purchase mortgage-backed pass through and collateralized mortgage obligation (“CMO”) securities insured or guaranteed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac (government-sponsored enterprises) and Ginnie Mae (government agency), and to a lesser extent, a variety of federal and state housing authorities (collectively referred to below as “agency-issued mortgage-backed securities”). At December 31, 2019, agency-issued mortgage-backed securities including CMOs, totaled $3.57 billion, or 92.7%, of our total securities portfolio. During the second quarter of 2019, the Company early adopted ASU 2019-04, “Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial Instruments” and reclassified $393.1 million of debt securities held-to-maturity to debt securities available-for-sale. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company received proceeds of $399.4 million on the sale of mortgage-backed securities from the available-for-sale portfolio resulting in gross realized losses of $5.7 million. Proceeds from the sale were reinvested in higher yielding mortgage-backed securities.

Actual cash flows on mortgage-backed securities may differ from estimated cash flows over the life of the security, which may require adjustments to the amortization of any premium or accretion of any discount relating to such instruments that can change the net yield on such securities. There is also reinvestment risk associated with the cash flows from such securities. The fair value of such securities may be adversely affected by changes in interest rates and/or other market variables.

Our mortgage-backed securities portfolio had a weighted average yield of 2.69% for the year ended December 31, 2019. The estimated fair value of our mortgage-backed securities at December 31, 2019 was $3.58 billion, which is $50.4 million more than the carrying value. The increase to the fair value is attributed to a decrease in interest rates during 2019.

We also may invest in securities issued by non-agency or private mortgage originators, provided those securities are rated AAA by nationally recognized rating agencies and satisfactorily pass an internal credit review at the time of purchase. Currently, the Company does not hold any non-agency mortgage-backed securities in its portfolio.

Corporate and Other Debt Securities. Our corporate and other debt securities portfolio primarily consists of collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”) backed by pooled trust preferred securities (“TruPs”), principally issued by banks and to a lesser extent insurance companies and real estate investment trusts. The interest rates on these securities are indexed to the 3-month LIBOR rate and reset quarterly. These securities have been classified in the held-to-maturity portfolio since their purchase. In addition, our corporate and other debt securities portfolio contains subordinated debt issued by other financial institutions. At December 31, 2019, corporate and other debt securities totaled $72.5 million, or 1.88%, of our total securities portfolio.

At December 31, 2019, the TruPs portfolio had a carrying value of $47.5 million, or 1.23% of our total securities portfolio, and a fair value of $73.3 million with none of the securities in an unrealized loss position. Throughout the year we engage an independent valuation firm to assist us in valuing our TruPs portfolio and the related other-than temporary impairment, or OTTI, analysis. At December 31, 2019, management deemed that the present value of projected cash flows for each security was greater than the book value and we did not recognize any OTTI charges for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company received proceeds of $7.3 million from the payoff and paydown of TruPs which resulted in $3.2 million of interest income from securities, as well as a gain of $1.2 million recognized as non-interest income. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company received proceeds of $3.1 million from the liquidation of one TruP security. As a result, $1.9 million was recognized as interest income from securities.

We continue to closely monitor the performance of our CDO portfolio as well as the events surrounding this segment of the market.

Municipal Bonds. At December 31, 2019, we had $143.2 million in municipal bonds which represents 3.72% of our total securities portfolio. These bonds are comprised of $10.6 million in short-term Bond Anticipation or Tax Anticipation notes and $132.6 million of longer term Revenue Bonds.

Government Sponsored Enterprises. At December 31, 2019, debt securities issued by Government Sponsored Enterprises held in our security portfolio totaled $58.6 million representing 1.52% of our total securities portfolio.

Equity Securities. At December 31, 2019, we had $6.0 million in equity securities representing 0.16% of our total securities portfolio. Equity securities are not insured or guaranteed investments and are affected by market interest rates and stock market fluctuations. Such investments are carried at their fair value with fluctuations in the fair value of such investments, including temporary declines in value, reflected in the consolidated income statement.

Table of Contents

Securities Portfolios. The following table sets forth the composition of our investment securities portfolios at the dates indicated.



	At December 31,
	2019			2018		2017
	Carrying Value		Estimated Fair Value	Carrying Value	Estimated Fair Value	Carrying Value	Estimated Fair Value
	(In thousands)
Equity securities	$	5,096	6,039	5,001	5,793	4,911	5,701
Available-for-sale:
Mortgage-backed securities:
Federal National Mortgage Association	$	1,159,446	1,178,049	980,546	968,556	1,322,255	1,303,576
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation	1,223,587		1,240,379	988,348	986,650	649,060	640,242
Government National Mortgage Association	273,676		276,962	165,211	166,956	39,577	38,208
Total mortgage-backed securities available-for-sale	2,656,709		2,695,390	2,134,105	2,122,162	2,010,892	1,982,026
Total debt securities available-for-sale	$	2,656,709	2,695,390	2,134,105	2,122,162	2,010,892	1,982,026
Held-to-maturity:
Debt securities:
Government sponsored enterprises	$	58,624	58,312	41,258	40,022	43,281	42,596
Municipal bonds	143,151		146,905	25,513	26,455	40,595	41,846
Corporate and other debt securities	72,537		98,695	50,441	87,033	48,087	86,294
Total debt securities	274,312		303,912	117,212	153,510	131,963	170,736
Mortgage-backed securities:
Federal National Mortgage Association	542,210		549,862	954,548	932,396	1,101,093	1,091,600
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation	261,945		265,349	401,636	392,335	473,345	468,436
Government National Mortgage Association	70,348		70,981	81,741	80,323	90,220	89,353
Total mortgage-backed securities held-to-maturity	874,503		886,192	1,437,925	1,405,054	1,664,658	1,649,389
Total debt securities held-to-maturity	$	1,148,815	1,190,104	1,555,137	1,558,564	1,796,621	1,820,125
Total securities	$	3,810,620	3,891,533	3,694,243	3,686,519	3,812,424	3,807,852

At December 31, 2019, except for our investments in Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae securities, we had no investment in the securities of any issuer that had an aggregate book value in excess of 10% of our equity.

Table of Contents

Portfolio Maturities and Coupon. The composition, maturities and weighted average coupon rate of the securities portfolio at December 31, 2019 are summarized in the following table. Maturities are based on the final contractual payment dates, and do not reflect the impact of prepayments or early redemptions that may occur. Municipal securities coupons have not been adjusted to a tax-equivalent basis.



	One Year or Less				More than One Year through Five Years				More than Five Years through Ten Years				More than Ten Years				Total Securities
	Carrying Value		Weighted Average Coupon		Carrying Value		Weighted Average Coupon		Carrying Value		Weighted Average Coupon		Carrying Value		Weighted Average Coupon		Carrying Value		Fair Value		Weighted Average Coupon
	(Dollars in thousands)
Equity securities	$	—	—	%	$	—	—	%	$	—	—	%	$	5,096	—	%	$	5,096	$	6,039	—	%
Available-for-Sale:
Mortgage-backed securities:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation	—		—		3,991		2.75		338,648		2.41		880,948		2.92		1,223,587		1,240,379		2.77
Federal National Mortgage Association	5,297		2.82		5,140		2.66		78,680		2.56		1,070,329		2.73		1,159,446		1,178,049		2.72
Government National Mortgage Association	—		—		—		—		—		—		273,676		2.95		273,676		276,962		2.95
Total mortgage-backed securities	5,297		2.82		9,131		2.70		417,328		2.44		2,224,953		2.83		2,656,709		2,695,390		2.77
Total available-for-sale debt securities	$	5,297	2.82	%	$	9,131	2.70	%	$	417,328	2.44	%	$	2,224,953	2.83	%	$	2,656,709	$	2,695,390	2.77	%
Held-to-Maturity:
Debt securities:
Government sponsored enterprises	$	—	—	%	$	—	—	%	$	26,428	2.43	%	$	32,196	2.16	%	$	58,624	$	58,312	2.28	%
Municipal bonds	10,579		3.12		—		—		3,715		9.13		128,857		2.84		143,151		146,905		3.02
Corporate and other debt securities	—		—		—		—		25,000		4.33		47,537		3.41		72,537		98,695		3.73
Total debt securities	10,579		3.12		—		—		55,143		3.74		208,590		2.87		274,312		303,912		3.05
Mortgage-backed securities:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation	—		—		209		5.08		197,870		2.64		63,866		2.54		261,945		265,349		2.61
Federal National Mortgage Association	—		—		—		—		254,362		2.40		287,848		2.98		542,210		549,862		2.71
Government National Mortgage Association	—		—		—		—		7,240		2.36		63,108		2.68		70,348		70,981		2.65
Total mortgage-backed securities	—		—		209		5.08		459,472		2.50		414,822		2.87		874,503		886,192		2.68
Total held-to-maturity debt securities	$	10,579	3.12	%	$	209	5.08	%	$	514,615	2.64	%	$	623,412	2.87	%	$	1,148,815	$	1,190,104	2.77	%

Table of Contents

Sources of Funds

General. Deposits are the primary source of funds used for our lending and investment activities. Our strategy is to increase core deposit growth to fund these activities. In addition, we use a significant amount of borrowings, primarily advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York (“FHLB”), to supplement cash flow needs, to lengthen the maturities of liabilities for interest rate risk management and to manage our cost of funds. Additional sources of funds include principal and interest payments from loans and securities, loan and security prepayments and maturities, repurchase agreements, brokered deposits, income on other earning assets and retained earnings. While cash flows from loans and securities payments can be relatively stable sources of funds, deposit inflows and outflows can vary widely and are influenced by prevailing interest rates, market conditions and levels of competition.

Deposits. At December 31, 2019, we held $17.86 billion in total deposits, representing 74.2% of our total liabilities. Our long-term deposit strategy has been focused on attracting core deposits (savings, checking and money market accounts) as they represent a more stable source of low cost funds and may be less sensitive to changes in market interest rates. At December 31, 2019, we held $13.85 billion in core deposits, representing 77.6% of total deposits, of which $266.4 million are brokered money market deposits. At December 31, 2019, $4.01 billion, or 22.4%, of our total deposit balances were certificates of deposit, which included $1.31 billion of brokered certificates of deposit. Municipal deposits are a significant source of funds. At December 31, 2019, $4.89 billion, or 27.4%, of our total deposits consisted of public fund deposits from local government entities, predominately domiciled in the state of New Jersey.

We have a suite of commercial deposit products, designed to appeal to small and mid-sized businesses and non-profit organizations. Interest rates, maturity terms, service fees and withdrawal penalties are all reviewed on a periodic basis. Deposit rates and terms are based primarily on our current operating strategies, market rates, liquidity requirements, competitive forces and growth goals. We also rely on personalized customer service, long-standing relationships with customers and an active marketing program to attract and retain deposits.

The flow of deposits is influenced significantly by general economic conditions, changes in money market and other prevailing interest rates and competition. The variety of deposit accounts we offer allows us to respond to changes in consumer demands and to be competitive in obtaining deposit funds. Our ability to attract and maintain deposits and the rates we pay on deposits will continue to be significantly affected by market conditions.

We intend to continue to invest in technology platforms and branch staff training, de novo branches, and to aggressively market and advertise our core deposit products and will attempt to generate our deposits from a diverse client group within our primary market area. We remain focused on attracting and maintaining deposits from consumers, businesses and municipalities which operate in our marketplace. The Bank also utilizes Investors eAccess, a secure online channel, to attract deposits nationwide.

The following table sets forth the distribution of total deposit accounts, by account type, at the dates indicated.



	At December 31,
	2019						2018						2017
	Balance		Percent of Total Deposits		Weighted Average Rate		Balance		Percent of Total Deposits		Weighted Average Rate		Balance		Percent of Total Deposits		Weighted Average Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
Non-interest bearing:
Checking accounts	$	2,472,232	13.8	%	—	%	$	2,535,848	14.4	%	—	%	$	2,424,608	14.0	%	—	%
Interest-bearing:
Checking accounts	5,512,979		30.9		1.36		4,783,563		27.2		1.53		4,909,054		28.3		0.91
Money market deposits	3,817,718		21.4		1.50		3,641,070		20.7		1.55		4,243,545		24.4		0.90
Savings	2,050,101		11.5		0.86		2,048,941		11.7		0.64		2,320,228		13.4		0.48
Certificates of deposit	4,007,308		22.4		1.67		4,570,847		26.0		1.35		3,460,262		19.9		1.13
Total deposits	$	17,860,338	100.0	%	1.21	%	$	17,580,269	100.0	%	1.16	%	$	17,357,697	100.0	%	0.77	%

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth, by rate category, the amount of certificates of deposit outstanding as of the dates indicated.



	At December 31,
	2019		2018		2017
	(Dollars in thousands)
Certificates of Deposit
0.00% - 0.25%	$	238,369	$	355,822	$	527,836
0.26% - 0.50%	77,234		107,088		141,253
0.51% - 1.00%	116,783		157,646		396,098
1.01% - 2.00%	1,921,656		942,149		2,355,997
2.01% - 3.00%	1,651,388		3,006,347		37,808
Over 3.00%	1,878		1,795		1,270
Total	$	4,007,308	$	4,570,847	$	3,460,262

The following table sets forth, by rate category, the remaining period to maturity of certificates of deposit outstanding at December 31, 2019.



	Within Three Months		Over Three to Six Months		Over Six Months to One Year		Over One Year to Two Years		Over Two Years to Three Years		Over Three Years		Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Certificates of Deposit
0.00% - 0.25%	$	100,916	$	59,711	$	67,881	$	6,623	$	1,686	$	1,552	$	238,369
0.26% - 0.50%	16,981		17,284		14,208		28,761		—		—		77,234
0.51% - 1.00%	9,630		7,571		11,537		41,946		29,891		16,208		116,783
1.01% - 2.00%	428,054		356,793		1,017,569		102,344		9,407		7,489		1,921,656
2.01% - 3.00%	575,503		513,821		428,791		129,703		937		2,633		1,651,388
Over 3.00%	—		—		979		557		249		93		1,878
Total	$	1,131,084	$	955,180	$	1,540,965	$	309,934	$	42,170	$	27,975	$	4,007,308

The following table sets forth the aggregate amount of outstanding certificates of deposit in amounts greater than or equal to $100,000 and the respective maturity of those certificates as of December 31, 2019.



	At December 31, 2019
	(In thousands)
Three months or less	$	924,396
Over three months through six months	706,050
Over six months through one year	1,066,160
Over one year	229,168
Total	$	2,925,774

Table of Contents

Borrowings. We borrow directly from the FHLB. All of our FHLB borrowings are advances collateralized by our residential and commercial mortgage portfolios. The following table sets forth information concerning balances and interest rates on our advances from the FHLB at the dates and for the periods indicated.



	At or for the Year Ended December 31,
	2019			2018			2017			2016			2015
	(Dollars in thousands)
Balance at end of period	$	4,979,201		$	4,930,681		$	4,331,052		$	4,391,420		$	3,106,783
Average balance during period	5,205,066			4,655,757			4,526,596			3,663,087			2,997,873
Maximum outstanding at any month end	5,723,556			5,080,960			5,355,298			4,391,420			3,548,000
Weighted average interest rate at end of period	2.06		%	2.16		%	1.96		%	1.79		%	2.12		%
Average interest rate during period	2.18		%	2.01		%	1.88		%	1.86		%	2.06		%

We also borrow funds under repurchase agreements with the FHLB and various brokers. These agreements are recorded as financing transactions as we maintain effective control over the transferred or pledged securities. The dollar amount of the securities underlying the agreements continues to be carried in our securities portfolio while the obligations to repurchase the securities are reported as liabilities. The securities underlying the agreements are delivered to the party with whom each transaction is executed. Those parties agree to resell to us the identical securities we delivered to them at the maturity of the agreement. The following table sets forth information concerning balances and interest rates on our securities sold under agreements to repurchase at the dates and for the periods indicated. In addition, the Bank had unsecured overnight borrowing lines with other institutions totaling $750.0 million, of which $400.0 million was outstanding at December 31, 2019.



	At or for the Year Ended December 31,
	2019			2018			2017			2016			2015
	(Dollars in thousands)
Balance at end of period	$	447,910		$	250,000		$	130,481		$	154,831		$	156,307
Average balance during period	369,046			202,027			149,030			153,000			159,438
Maximum outstanding at any month end	447,910			280,000			153,000			154,831			163,000
Weighted average interest rate at end of period	2.16		%	2.67		%	1.87		%	2.19		%	2.21		%
Average interest rate during period	2.45		%	2.68		%	2.11		%	2.16		%	2.25		%

Subsidiary Activities

Investors Bancorp, Inc. has one direct subsidiary, which is Investors Bank.

Investors Bank. Investors Bank is a New Jersey-chartered commercial bank headquartered in Short Hills, New Jersey. Originally founded in 1926, the bank is in the business of attracting deposits from the public through its branch network and Investors eAccess, and borrowing funds in the wholesale markets to originate loans and to invest in securities. Investors Bank has the following active direct and indirect subsidiaries: Investors Investment Corp., Investors Commercial, Inc., Investors Financial Group, Inc., Investors Financial Group Insurance Agency, Inc., MNBNY Holdings Inc. and Marathon Realty Investors Inc. Investors Bank also has several additional subsidiaries which are inactive: My Way Development LLC, Investors Financial Services, Inc. and Investors Real Estate Corporation. In 2019, after receiving required regulatory approval, Investors Home Mortgage, a then subsidiary, was merged into Investors Bank.

•Investors Investment Corp. Investors Investment Corp. is a New Jersey corporation that was formed in 2004 as an investment company subsidiary. The purpose of this subsidiary is to manage and invest in securities such as, but not limited to, U.S. Treasury obligations, mortgage-backed securities, certificates of deposit, mutual funds, and equity securities, subject to certain limitations.

•Investors Commercial, Inc. Investors Commercial, Inc. is a New Jersey corporation that was formed in 2010 as an operating subsidiary of Investors Bank. The purpose of this subsidiary is to originate and purchase residential mortgage loans and commercial loans including multi-family mortgage loans, commercial real estate mortgage loans and C&I mortgage loans primarily in New York State.

Table of Contents

•Investors Financial Group, Inc. Investors Financial Group, Inc. is a New Jersey corporation that was formed in 2011 as an operating subsidiary of Investors Bank. The primary purpose of this subsidiary is to process sales of non-deposit investment products through third party service providers to customers and consumers as may be referred by Investors Bank.

•Investors Financial Group Insurance Agency, Inc. Investors Financial Group Insurance Agency, Inc. is a New Jersey licensed insurance agency formed in 2016 as an operating subsidiary of Investors Financial Group, Inc. The purpose of this subsidiary is to receive commissions relating to the sale of certain insurance products, including, but not limited to, life insurance, fixed annuities and indexed annuities.

•MNBNY Holdings Inc. MNBNY Holdings Inc. is a New York corporation that was formed in 2006 and acquired in the merger with Marathon Banking Corporation in October 2012. MNBNY Holdings Inc. serves as a holding company and is the 100% owner of Marathon Realty Investors Inc.

•Marathon Realty Investors Inc. Marathon Realty Investors Inc. is a New York corporation established in 2006 and acquired in the merger with Marathon Banking Corporation in October 2012. Marathon Realty Investors Inc. engages in the business of a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for the purpose of acquiring mortgage loans and other real estate related assets from Investors Bank.

Enterprise Risk Management Framework

Our Board of Directors oversees our risk management process, including the bank-wide approach to risk management, carried out by our management. Our Board approves the strategic plans and the policies that set standards for the nature and level of risk we are willing to assume. The Board receives reports on the management of critical risks and the effectiveness of risk management systems. While our full Board maintains the ultimate oversight responsibility for the risk management process, its committees, including Audit, Risk Oversight and Compensation and Benefits committees, oversee risk in certain specified areas. The Risk Oversight Committee of the Board meets quarterly and provides independent oversight of all risk functions. Our Board has assigned responsibility to our Chief Risk Officer for maintaining the Enterprise Risk Management (“ERM”) framework to identify, assess, monitor and mitigate risks in the execution of our strategic goals and objectives and ensure we operate in a safe and sound manner in accordance with the Board approved policies.

The Bank’s Management Risk Committee meets regularly and provides governance over risk policy and risk escalation. The ERM framework supports a culture that promotes proactive risk management by all Bank employees, a risk appetite framework with defined risk tolerance limits, and risk governance with a three lines of defense model to manage and oversee risk. In a three lines of defense structure, each line of business and corporate function serves as the first line of defense and has responsibility for identifying, assessing, managing and mitigating risks in their areas. Independent Risk Management serves as the second line of defense and is responsible for providing guidance, oversight and appropriate challenge to the first line of defense. Internal Audit serves as the third line of defense and ensures that appropriate risk management controls, processes and systems are in place and functioning effectively.

Our ERM framework is consistent with common industry practices and regulatory guidance and is appropriate to our size, growth trajectory and the complexity of our business activities. The ERM Framework encompasses the following categories of risks; credit risk, interest rate risk, liquidity risk, price risk, operational risk, model risk, supplier risk, fraud risk, information security including cybersecurity, compliance risk, strategic risk, and reputational risk.

Personnel

As of December 31, 2019, we had 1,735 full-time employees and 58 part-time employees. The employees are not represented by a collective bargaining unit and we consider our relationship with our employees to be good.

Table of Contents

Supervision and Regulation

The Bank is a New Jersey-chartered commercial bank, and its deposit accounts are insured up to applicable limits by the FDIC under the Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”). The Bank is subject to extensive regulation, examination and supervision by the Commissioner of the NJDOBI (the “Commissioner”) as the issuer of its charter, and, as a non-member state chartered commercial bank, by the FDIC as the deposit insurer and its primary federal regulator. The Bank must file reports with the Commissioner and the FDIC concerning its activities and financial condition, and it must obtain regulatory approval prior to entering into certain transactions, such as mergers with, or acquisitions of, other depository institutions and opening or acquiring branch offices. The Commissioner and the FDIC each conduct periodic examinations to assess the Bank’s compliance with various regulatory requirements. This regulation and supervision establishes a comprehensive framework of activities in which a commercial bank may engage and is intended primarily for the protection of the DIF and its depositors. The regulatory structure also gives the regulatory authorities extensive discretion in connection with their supervisory and enforcement activities and examination policies, including policies with respect to the classification of assets and the establishment of adequate loan loss reserves for regulatory purposes.

As a bank holding company controlling the Bank, the Company is subject to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (“BHCA”), and the rules and regulations of the Federal Reserve Board under the BHCA and to the provisions of the New Jersey Banking Act of 1948 (the “New Jersey Banking Act”) and the regulations of the Commissioner under the New Jersey Banking Act applicable to bank holding companies.

The regulatory framework applicable to bank holding companies and their subsidiary banks is intended to protect depositors, the DIF, and the U.S. banking system as a whole. This system is not designed to protect equity investors in bank holding companies. The Company is required to file reports with, and otherwise comply with the rules and regulations of, the Federal Reserve Board, the Commissioner and the FDIC. The Federal Reserve Board and the Commissioner conduct periodic examinations to assess the Company’s compliance with various regulatory requirements. The Company files certain reports with, and otherwise complies with, the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission under the federal securities laws and the listing requirements of NASDAQ.

Our business is heavily regulated by both state and federal agencies. Both the scope of the laws and regulations and the intensity of supervision to which our business is subject have increased in recent years, in response to the financial crisis as well as other factors such as technological and market changes. Regulatory enforcement and fines have also increased across the banking and financial services sector. Many of these changes have occurred as a result of the Dodd-Frank Act and its implementing regulations, most of which are now in place. In addition, on May 24, 2018, the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act (the “EGRRCP Act”) was enacted. This legislation includes targeted amendments to the Dodd-Frank Act and other financial services laws. While there have been some changes to the post-financial crisis framework applicable to the Company, primarily relating to stress testing, the Company expects that its business will remain subject to extensive regulation and supervision.

Stress Tests

Prior to the enactment of the EGRRCP Act, the Dodd-Frank Act required banks with total consolidated assets of more than $10 billion to conduct annual stress tests. The Dodd-Frank Act also required the FDIC, in coordination with federal financial regulatory agencies, to issue regulations establishing methodologies for stress testing that provide for at least three different sets of conditions, including baseline, adverse, and severely adverse. The regulations also required banks to publish a summary of the results of the stress tests. The EGRRCP Act has eliminated the annual mandated stress test requirement for banks like us with total consolidated assets of less than $100 billion.

While we are no longer required to conduct annual stress tests, we have advised our regulators that we will continue to conduct stress testing of our loan portfolio and advise our Board of Directors and our regulators of the results of such testing.

Volcker Rule

Under the provisions of the Volcker Rule we are prohibited from: (i) engaging in short-term proprietary trading for our own account; and (ii) having certain ownership interest in and relationships with hedge funds or private equity funds. The final Volcker Rule regulations impose significant compliance and reporting obligations on banking entities. The Company has put in place the compliance programs required by the Volcker Rule and has also implemented a governance and control program to ensure appropriate oversight and ongoing compliance. In 2019, the U.S. banking agencies adopted changes to the regulations implementing the Volcker Rule designed to establish a more risk-based approach to compliance and reduce the complexity of the regulations. The changes were effective January 1, 2020.

Table of Contents

Consumer Protection and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Supervision

The Dodd-Frank Act also established the CFPB. The CFPB has rulemaking authority over all banks, and its examination and enforcement authority applies to banks at or greater than $10 billion in total assets. The Bank is subject to CFPB supervision and examination of compliance with Federal Consumer Protection Laws. In addition, this agency is responsible for interpreting and enforcing a broad range of consumer protection laws (“Federal Consumer Protection Laws”) that govern the provision of deposit accounts and the making of loans, including the regulation of mortgage lending and servicing. This includes laws such as the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Truth in Lending Act, the Truth in Savings Act, the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act and the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

The Dodd-Frank Act permits states to adopt stricter consumer protection laws and for state attorneys general to enforce consumer protection rules issued by the CFPB. The Company expects that its business will remain subject to extensive regulations and supervision by the CFPB as well as applicable state consumer protection laws and regulations, which will continue to increase our operating and compliance costs.

New Jersey Banking Regulation

Activity Powers. The Bank derives its lending, investment and other powers primarily from the applicable provisions of the New Jersey Banking Act and its related regulations. Under these laws and regulations, commercial banks, including the Bank, generally may invest in:


•	real estate mortgages;


•	consumer and commercial loans;


•	specific types of debt securities, including certain corporate debt securities and obligations of federal, state and local governments and agencies;


•	certain types of corporate equity securities; and


•	certain other assets.

A commercial bank may also make investments pursuant to a “leeway” power, which permits investments not otherwise permitted by the New Jersey Banking Act, subject to certain restrictions imposed by the FDIC. “Leeway” investments must comply with a number of limitations on the individual and aggregate amounts of “leeway” investments. A commercial bank may also exercise trust powers upon approval of the Commissioner. Lastly, New Jersey commercial banks may exercise those powers, rights, benefits or privileges authorized for national banks or out-of-state banks or for federal or out-of-state commercial banks or savings associations, provided that before exercising any such power, right, benefit or privilege, prior approval by the Commissioner by regulation or by specific authorization is required. The exercise of these lending, investment and activity powers are limited by federal law and the related regulations. See “Federal Banking Regulation — Activity Restrictions on State-Chartered Banks” below.

Loans-to-One-Borrower Limitations. With certain specified exceptions, a New Jersey-chartered commercial bank may not make loans or extend credit to a single borrower or to entities related to the borrower in an aggregate amount that would exceed 15% of the bank’s capital funds. A commercial bank may lend an additional 10% of the bank’s capital funds if secured by collateral meeting the requirements of the New Jersey Banking Act. The Bank currently complies with applicable loans-to-one-borrower limitations.

Dividends. Under the New Jersey Banking Act, a commercial bank may declare and pay a dividend on its capital stock only to the extent that the payment of the dividend would not impair the capital stock of the commercial bank. In addition, a commercial bank may not pay a dividend unless the commercial bank would, after the payment of the dividend, have a surplus of not less than 50% of its capital stock, or alternatively, the payment of the dividend would not reduce the surplus. Federal law may also limit the amount of dividends that may be paid by the Bank. See “— Federal Banking Regulation — Prompt Corrective Action” below.

Minimum Capital Requirements. Regulations of the Commissioner impose on New Jersey-chartered depository institutions, including the Bank, minimum capital requirements similar to those imposed on insured state banks. See “— Federal Banking Regulation — Capital Requirements” below.

Examination and Enforcement. The NJDOBI may examine the Bank whenever it deems an examination advisable. The NJDOBI engages in routine annual examinations of the Bank. The Commissioner may order any commercial bank to discontinue any violation of law or unsafe or unsound business practice, and may direct any director, officer, attorney or employee of a commercial bank engaged in an objectionable activity, after the Commissioner has ordered the activity to be terminated, to show cause at a hearing before the Commissioner why such person should not be removed. The Commissioner may also seek the appointment of receiver or conservator for a New Jersey commercial bank under certain conditions.

Table of Contents

Federal Banking Regulation

Capital Requirements. In July 2013, the FDIC and the other federal bank regulatory agencies issued a final rule that revised their leverage and risk-based capital requirements and the method for calculating risk-weighted assets to make them consistent with agreements that were reached by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. The Final Capital Rules also revised the quantity and quality of required minimum risk-based and leverage capital requirements, consistent with the Reform Act and the Third Basel Accord adopted by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, or Basel III capital standards. In doing so, the Final Capital Rules:


•	Established a new minimum Common equity tier 1 risk-based capital ratio (common equity tier 1 capital to total risk-weighted assets) of 4.5% and increased the minimum Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio from 4.0% to 6.0%, while maintaining the minimum Total risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% and the minimum Tier 1 leverage capital ratio of 4.0%.


•	Revised the rules for calculating risk-weighted assets to enhance their risk sensitivity.


•	Phased out trust preferred securities and cumulative perpetual preferred stock as Tier 1 capital.

•

Added a requirement to maintain a minimum Conservation Buffer, composed of Common equity tier 1 capital, of 2.5% of risk-weighted assets, to be applied to the new Common equity tier 1 risk-based capital ratio, the Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio and the Total risk-based capital ratio, which means that banking organizations, on a fully phased in basis as of January 1, 2019, must maintain a minimum Common equity tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 7.0%, a minimum Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 8.5% and a minimum Total risk-based capital ratio of 10.5% or have restrictions imposed on capital distributions and discretionary cash bonus payments.

•

Changed the definitions of capital categories for insured depository institutions for purposes of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 prompt corrective action provisions. Under these revised definitions, to be considered well-capitalized, an insured depository institution must have a Tier 1 leverage capital ratio of at least 5.0%, a Common equity tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 6.5%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 8.0% and a Total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10.0%.

The new minimum regulatory capital ratios and changes to the calculation of risk-weighted assets became effective for the Bank and Company on January 1, 2015. The required minimum Conservation Buffer commenced on January 1, 2016 at 0.625% and increased in annual increments to 2.5% on January 1, 2019, which is the fully phased in Conservation Buffer. The rules impose restrictions on capital distributions and certain discretionary cash bonus payments if the minimum Conservation Buffer is not met. As of December 31, 2019, the Company and the Bank met the required Conservation Buffer of 2.5%.

In assessing an institution’s capital adequacy, the FDIC takes into consideration, not only these numeric factors, but qualitative factors as well, and has the authority to establish higher capital requirements for individual institutions where deemed necessary.

The federal banking agencies, including the FDIC, have also adopted regulations to require an assessment of an institution’s exposure to declines in the economic value of a bank’s capital due to changes in interest rates when assessing the bank’s capital adequacy. Under such a risk assessment, examiners evaluate a bank’s capital for interest rate risk on a case-by-case basis, with consideration of both quantitative and qualitative factors. Institutions with significant interest rate risk may be required to hold additional capital. According to the agencies, applicable considerations include:


•	the quality of the bank’s interest rate risk management process;


•	the overall financial condition of the bank; and


•	the level of other risks at the bank for which capital is needed.

Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2019, the Bank and the Company were considered “well capitalized” under applicable regulations and exceeded all regulatory capital requirements as follows:



	As of December 31, 2019 ⁽¹⁾
	Actual				Minimum Capital Requirement with Conservation Buffer				To be Well Capitalized under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions ⁽²⁾
	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio
	(Dollars in thousands)
Bank:
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio	$	2,197,188	8.22	%	$	1,069,276	4.000	%	$	1,336,595	5.00	%
Common Equity Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital	2,197,188		11.03	%	1,394,527		7.000	%	1,294,918		6.50	%
Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital	2,197,188		11.03	%	1,693,355		8.500	%	1,593,746		8.00	%
Total Risk-Based Capital	2,426,233		12.18	%	2,091,791		10.500	%	1,992,182		10.00	%

Investors Bancorp, Inc.:
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio	$	2,553,447	9.53	%	$	1,072,095	4.000	%	n/a		n/a
Common Equity Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital	2,553,447		12.78	%	1,399,008		7.000	%	n/a		n/a
Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital	2,553,447		12.78	%	1,698,795		8.500	%	n/a		n/a
Total Risk-Based Capital	2,782,493		13.92	%	2,098,512		10.500	%	n/a		n/a


(1)	For purposes of calculating Tier 1 leverage ratio, assets are based on adjusted total average assets. In calculating Tier 1 risk-based capital and Total risk-based capital, assets are based on total risk-weighted assets.


(2)	Prompt corrective action provisions do not apply to the bank holding company.

Activity Restrictions on State-Chartered Banks. Federal law and FDIC regulations generally limit the activities and investments of state-chartered FDIC insured banks and their subsidiaries to those permissible for national banks and their subsidiaries, unless such activities and investments are specifically exempted by law or consented to by the FDIC.

Before making a new investment or engaging in a new activity that is not permissible for a national bank or otherwise permissible under federal law or FDIC regulations, an insured bank must seek approval from the FDIC to make such investment or engage in such activity. The FDIC will not approve the activity unless the bank meets its minimum capital requirements and the FDIC determines that the activity does not present a significant risk to the FDIC insurance funds. Certain activities of subsidiaries that are engaged in activities permitted for national banks only through a “financial subsidiary” are subject to additional restrictions.

Federal law permits a state-chartered commercial bank to engage, through financial subsidiaries, in any activity in which a national bank may engage through a financial subsidiary and on substantially the same terms and conditions. In general, the law permits a national bank that is well-capitalized and well-managed to conduct, through a financial subsidiary, any activity permitted for a financial holding company other than insurance underwriting, insurance investments or real estate development or merchant banking. The total assets of all such financial subsidiaries may not exceed the lesser of 45% of the bank’s total assets or $50 billion. The bank must have policies and procedures to assess the financial subsidiary’s risk and protect the bank from such risk and potential liability, must not consolidate the financial subsidiary’s assets with the bank’s and must exclude from its own assets and equity all equity investments, including retained earnings, in the financial subsidiary. State-chartered commercial banks may retain subsidiaries in existence as of March 11, 2000 and may engage in activities that are not authorized under federal law. Although the Bank meets all conditions necessary to establish and engage in permitted activities through financial subsidiaries, it has not chosen to engage in such activities.

Federal Home Loan Bank System. The Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank system, which consists of the regional Federal Home Loan Banks, each subject to supervision and regulation by the Federal Housing Finance Agency (“FHFA”). The Federal Home Loan Banks provide a credit facility for member institutions. It is funded primarily from proceeds derived from the sale of consolidated obligations of the Federal Home Loan Banks. The Federal Home Loan Banks make loans to members (i.e., advances) in accordance with policies and procedures, including collateral requirements, established by the respective Boards of Directors of the Federal Home Loan Banks. These policies and procedures are subject to the regulation and oversight of the FHFA. The FHFA has also established standards of community or investment service that members must meet to maintain access to such long-term advances.

Safety and Soundness Standards. Pursuant to the requirements of FDICIA, as amended by the Riegle Community Development and Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994, each federal banking agency, including the FDIC, has adopted guidelines establishing general standards relating to matters such as internal controls, information and internal audit systems, loan

Table of Contents

documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth, asset quality, earnings and compensation, fees and benefits. In general, the guidelines require, among other things, appropriate systems and practices to identify and manage the risks and exposures specified in the guidelines. The guidelines prohibit excessive compensation as an unsafe and unsound practice and describe compensation as excessive when the amounts paid are unreasonable or disproportionate to the services performed by an executive officer, employee, director, or principal stockholder.

In addition, the FDIC adopted regulations to require a commercial bank that is given notice by the FDIC that it is not satisfying any of such safety and soundness standards to submit a compliance plan to the FDIC. If, after being so notified, a commercial bank fails to submit an acceptable compliance plan or fails in any material respect to implement an accepted compliance plan, the FDIC may issue an order directing corrective and other actions of the types to which a significantly undercapitalized institution is subject under the “prompt corrective action” provisions of FDICIA. If a commercial bank fails to comply with such an order, the FDIC may seek to enforce such an order in judicial proceedings and to impose civil monetary penalties.

Enforcement. The FDIC has extensive enforcement authority over insured commercial banks, including the Bank. This enforcement authority includes, among other things, the ability to assess civil money penalties, to issue cease and desist orders and to remove directors and officers. In general, these enforcement actions may be initiated in response to violations of laws and regulations and to unsafe or unsound practices.

Prompt Corrective Action. Federal law establishes a prompt corrective action framework to resolve the problems of undercapitalized institutions. The FDIC has adopted regulations to implement the prompt corrective action legislation. Those regulations were amended effective January 1, 2015 to incorporate the previously mentioned increased regulatory capital standards that were effective on the same date. An institution is deemed to be “well capitalized” if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.0% or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% or greater, a leverage ratio of 5.0% or greater and a common equity Tier 1 ratio of 6.5% or greater. An institution is “adequately capitalized” if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.0% or greater, a leverage ratio of 4.0% or greater and a common equity Tier 1 ratio of 4.5% or greater. An institution is “undercapitalized” if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 8.0%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 6.0%, a leverage ratio of less than 4.0% or a common equity Tier 1 ratio of less than 4.5%. An institution is deemed to be “significantly undercapitalized” if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 6.0%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 4.0%, a leverage ratio of less than 3.0% or a common equity Tier 1 ratio of less than 3.0%. An institution is considered to be “critically undercapitalized” if it has a ratio of tangible equity (as defined in the regulations) to total assets that is equal to or less than 2.0%.

Generally, a receiver or conservator must be appointed for an institution that is “critically undercapitalized” within specific time frames. The regulations also provide that a capital restoration plan must be filed with the FDIC within 45 days of the date a commercial bank receives notice that it is “undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized” or “critically undercapitalized.” Various restrictions, such as restrictions on capital distributions and growth, also apply to “undercapitalized” institutions. The FDIC may also take any one of a number of discretionary supervisory actions against undercapitalized institutions, including the issuance of a capital directive and the replacement of senior executive officers and directors.

The Bank was classified as “well-capitalized” under the prompt corrective action framework as of December 31, 2019.

Liquidity. The Bank maintains sufficient liquidity to ensure its safe and sound operation, in accordance with FDIC regulations. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

Deposit Insurance. The Bank is a member of the DIF, which is administered by the FDIC. Deposit accounts in the Bank are insured by the FDIC, up to a maximum of $250,000 for each separately insured depositor.

The FDIC imposes an assessment for deposit insurance against all insured depository institutions. Each institution’s assessment is based on the perceived risk to the insurance fund of the institution, with institutions deemed riskiest paying higher assessments. The Dodd-Frank Act required the FDIC to revise its procedures to base assessments on average total assets less tangible capital, rather than deposits. The FDIC’s assessment schedule ranges from 1.5 basis points to 40 basis points of average total assets less tangible capital. The FDIC has a more comprehensive approach to evaluating, for assessment purposes, the risk presented by larger institutions such as the Bank. Large institutions (i.e., $10 billion or more in assets) such as the Bank are subject to assessment based upon a detailed scorecard approach involving (i) a performance score determined using forward-looking risk measures, including certain stress testing, and (ii) a loss severity score, which is designed to measure, based on modeling, potential loss to the FDIC insurance fund if the institution failed. The total score is converted to an assessment rate, subject to certain adjustments. In addition, effective as of July 1, 2016, the FDIC implemented a requirement of the Dodd-Frank Act that institutions with assets of $10 billion or more be responsible for increasing the DIF reserve ratio from 1.15% to 1.35%. On September 30, 2018, the DIF reached 1.36%, ahead of the September 30, 2020 deadline required under the Dodd-Frank Act. FDIC regulations provide that surcharges on insured depository institutions with total consolidated assets of $10 billion or more will cease upon

Table of Contents

DIF reserve ratio reaching the statutorily required minimum. Assessments on large banks for periods subsequent to September 30, 2018 no longer include a quarterly surcharge.

Insurance of deposits may be terminated by the FDIC upon a finding that an institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by the FDIC. We are not currently aware of any practice, condition or violation that may lead to termination of our deposit insurance.

In addition to the FDIC assessments, the Financing Corporation was authorized to impose and collect, with the approval of the FDIC, assessments for anticipated payments, issuance costs and custodial fees on bonds issued by the FICO in the 1980s to recapitalize the former Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation. The bonds issued by the FICO began to mature in 2017 and fully matured in 2019. Consequently, insured banks are no longer paying a FICO assessment.

Transactions with Affiliates of Investors Bank. Transactions between an insured bank, such as the Bank, and any of its affiliates are governed by Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act and implementing regulations. An affiliate of a bank is any company or entity that controls, is controlled by or is under common control with the bank. Generally, a subsidiary of a bank that is not also a depository institution or financial subsidiary is not treated as an affiliate of the bank for purposes of Sections 23A and 23B.

Section 23A:


•	limits the extent to which a bank or its subsidiaries may engage in “covered transactions” with any one affiliate to an amount equal to 10% of such bank’s capital and surplus, as defined in the applicable regulations. Such transactions with all affiliates are limited to an amount equal to 20% of such capital and surplus; and


•	requires that all such transactions be on terms that are consistent with safe and sound banking practices.

The term “covered transaction” includes the making of loans, purchase of assets, issuance of guarantees and other similar types of transactions. Further, most loans by a bank to any of its affiliates must be secured by collateral in amounts ranging from 100% to 130% of the loan amounts. In addition, any covered transaction by a bank with an affiliate and any purchase of assets or services by a bank from an affiliate must be on terms that are substantially the same, or at least as favorable to the bank, as those that would be provided to a non-affiliate.

Pursuant to Federal Reserve Board Regulation O, we are also subject to quantitative restrictions on extensions of credit to executive officers, directors, principal stockholders and their related interests. In general, such extensions of credit (i) may not exceed certain dollar limitations, (ii) must be made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with third parties and (iii) must not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable features. Certain extensions of credit also require the approval of our Board of Directors.

Prohibitions Against Tying Arrangements. Banks are subject to the prohibitions of 12 U.S.C. Section 1972 on certain tying arrangements. A depository institution is prohibited, subject to specific exceptions, from extending credit to or offering any other service, or fixing or varying the consideration for such extension of credit or service, on the condition that the customer obtain some additional service from the institution or its affiliates or not obtain services of a competitor of the institution.

Privacy Standards. FDIC regulations require the Bank to disclose its privacy policy, including identifying with whom it shares “non-public personal information,” to customers at the time of establishing the customer relationship and annually thereafter.

The Bank is also required to provide its customers with the ability to “opt-out” of having the Bank share their non-public personal information with unaffiliated third parties before it can disclose such information, subject to certain exceptions.

In addition, in accordance with the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Bank must provide its customers with the ability to “opt-out” of having the Bank share their non-public personal information for marketing purposes with an affiliate or subsidiary before it can disclose such information.

The FDIC and other federal banking agencies adopted guidelines establishing standards for safeguarding customer information. The guidelines describe the agencies’ expectations for the creation, implementation and maintenance of an information security program, which includes administrative, technical and physical safeguards appropriate to the size and complexity of the institution and the nature and scope of its activities. The standards set forth in the guidelines are intended to insure the security and confidentiality of customer records and information, protect against any anticipated threats or hazards to the security or integrity of such records and protect against unauthorized access to or use of such records or information that could result in substantial harm or inconvenience to any customer.

Table of Contents

Community Reinvestment Act and Fair Lending Laws. All FDIC-insured institutions have a responsibility under the Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”) and related regulations to help meet the credit needs of their communities, including low- and moderate-income individuals and neighborhoods. In connection with its examination of a state chartered commercial bank, the FDIC is required to assess the institution’s record of compliance with the CRA. Among other things, the current CRA regulations rates an institution based on its actual performance in meeting community needs. In particular, the current evaluation system focuses on three tests:


•	a lending test, to evaluate the institution’s record of making loans in its service areas;


•	an investment test, to evaluate the institution’s record of investing in community development projects, affordable housing, and programs benefiting low or moderate income individuals and/or census tracts and businesses; and


•	a service test, to evaluate the institution’s delivery of services through its branches, ATMs and other offices.

An institution’s failure to comply with the provisions of the CRA could, at a minimum, result in regulatory restrictions on its activities. The Bank received a “satisfactory” CRA rating in our most recent publicly-available federal evaluation, which was conducted by the FDIC in October 2017.

In addition, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and the Fair Housing Act prohibit lenders from discriminating in their lending practices on the basis of characteristics specified in those statutes. The failure to comply with the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and the Fair Housing Act could result in enforcement actions by the FDIC, as well as other federal regulatory agencies and the Department of Justice.

In April 2018, the U.S. Department of Treasury issued a memorandum to the Federal banking regulators with recommended changes to the CRA’s implementing regulations to reduce their complexity and associated burden on banks. In December 2019, the FDIC, along with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the agency that regulates national banks, issued a proposed rule that would significantly amend the CRA regulations. We will continue to evaluate the impact of any changes to the regulations implementing the CRA.

Loans to a Bank’s Insiders

Federal Regulation. A bank’s loans to its insiders — executive officers, directors, principal shareholders (any owner of 10% or more of its stock) and any of certain entities affiliated with any such persons (an insider’s related interest) are subject to the conditions and limitations imposed by Section 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act and its implementing regulations. Under these restrictions, the aggregate amount of the loans to any insider and the insider’s related interests may not exceed the loans-to-one-borrower limit applicable to national banks, which is comparable to the loans-to-one-borrower limit applicable to the Bank. All loans by a bank to all insiders and insiders’ related interests in the aggregate may not exceed the bank’s capital and surplus. Federal regulation also requires that any proposed loan to an insider or a related interest of that insider be approved in advance by a majority of the board of directors of the bank, with any interested directors not participating in the voting, if such loan, when aggregated with any existing loans to that insider and the insider’s related interests, would exceed either (1) $500,000 or (2) the greater of $25,000 or 5% of the bank’s unimpaired capital and surplus.

Generally, loans to insiders must be made on substantially the same terms as, and follow credit underwriting procedures that are not less stringent than, those that are prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons. An exception is made for extensions of credit made pursuant to a benefit or compensation plan of a bank that is widely available to employees of the bank and that does not give any preference to insiders of the bank over other employees of the bank.

In addition, federal law prohibits extensions of credit to a bank’s insiders and their related interests by any other institution that has a correspondent banking relationship with the bank, unless such extension of credit is on substantially the same terms as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons and does not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable features.

With certain exceptions, loans to an executive officer, other than loans for the education of the officer’s children and certain loans secured by the officer’s residence, may not exceed the lesser of (1) $100,000 or (2) the greater of $25,000 or 2.5% of the bank’s capital and surplus.

New Jersey Regulation. The New Jersey Banking Act imposes conditions and limitations on loans and extensions of credit to directors and executive officers of a commercial bank and to corporations and partnerships controlled by such persons, which are comparable in many respects to the conditions and limitations imposed on the loans and extensions of credit to insiders and their related interests under federal law, as discussed above. The New Jersey Banking Act also provides that a commercial bank that is in compliance with federal law is deemed to be in compliance with such provisions of the New Jersey Banking Act.

Table of Contents

Federal Reserve System

Under Federal Reserve Board regulations, the Bank is required to maintain reserves against its transaction accounts. For 2020, the Federal Reserve Board regulations generally require that reserves of 3% must be maintained against aggregate transaction accounts over $16.9 million and up to $127.5 million, and 10% against that portion of total transaction accounts in excess of up to $127.5 million. The first $16.9 million of otherwise reservable balances are exempted from the reserve requirements. The Bank is in compliance with these requirements. These requirements are adjusted annually by the Federal Reserve Board. Required reserves must be maintained in the form of vault cash and/or an interest-bearing account at a Federal Reserve Bank; or a pass-through account as defined by the Federal Reserve Board.

Anti-Money Laundering and Customer Identification

The Bank is subject to FDIC regulations implementing the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001, or the USA PATRIOT Act. The USA PATRIOT Act gives the federal government powers to address terrorist threats through enhanced domestic security measures, expanded surveillance powers, increased information sharing, and broadened anti-money laundering (“AML”) requirements. By way of amendments to the Bank Secrecy Act (“BSA”), Title III of the USA PATRIOT Act contains measures intended to encourage information sharing among bank regulatory and law enforcement agencies. Further, certain provisions of Title III impose affirmative obligations on a broad range of financial institutions, including banks, thrifts, brokers, dealers, credit unions, money transfer agents and parties registered under the Commodity Exchange Act.

Title III of the USA PATRIOT Act and the related FDIC regulations require the:


•	Establishment of AML compliance programs that includes policies, procedures, and internal controls; the appointment of an AML compliance officer; an effective training program; and independent testing;


•	Making of certain reports to FinCEN and law enforcement that are designated to assist in the detection and prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing activities;


•	Establishment of a program specifying procedures for obtaining and maintaining certain records from customers seeking to open new accounts, including verifying the identity of customers within a reasonable period of time;


•	Establishment of enhanced due diligence policies, procedures and controls designed to detect and report money-laundering, terrorist financing and other suspicious activity;


•	Monitoring account activity for suspicious transactions; and


•	Impose a heightened level of review for certain high risk customers or accounts.

The USA PATRIOT Act also includes prohibitions on correspondent accounts for foreign shell banks and requires compliance with record keeping obligations with respect to correspondent accounts of foreign banks. Bank regulators are directed to consider a holding company’s effectiveness in combating money laundering when ruling on Federal Reserve Act and Bank Merger Act applications.

The bank regulatory agencies have increased the regulatory scrutiny of the BSA and AML programs maintained by financial institutions. Significant penalties and fines, as well as other supervisory orders may be imposed on a financial institution for non-compliance with these requirements. In addition, the federal bank regulatory agencies must consider the effectiveness of financial institutions engaging in a merger transaction in combating money laundering activities. The Bank has adopted policies and procedures to comply with these requirements.

Holding Company Regulation

Federal Regulation. Bank holding companies, including the Company, are subject to examination, regulation and periodic reporting under the Bank Holding Company Act, as administered by the Federal Reserve Board. Federal Reserve Board regulations impose consolidated capital adequacy requirements on bank holding companies. The Dodd-Frank Act required the Federal Reserve Board to promulgate consolidated capital requirements for depository institution holding companies that are no less stringent, both quantitatively and in terms of components of capital, than those applicable to institutions themselves.

In addition, Federal Reserve Board guidance sets forth the supervisory expectation that bank holding companies will inform and consult with Federal Reserve Board staff in advance of issuing a dividend that exceeds earnings for the quarter and should inform the Federal Reserve Board and should eliminate, defer or significantly reduce dividends if (i) net income available to shareholders for the past four quarters, net of dividends previously paid during that period, is not sufficient to fully fund the dividends, (ii) prospective rate of earnings retention is not consistent with the bank holding company’s capital needs and overall current and prospective financial condition, or (iii) the bank holding company will not meet, or is in danger of not meeting, its minimum regulatory capital adequacy ratios.

Table of Contents

A bank holding company is required to provide the Federal Reserve Board prior written notice of any purchase or redemption of its outstanding equity securities if the gross consideration for the purchase or redemption, when combined with the net consideration paid for all such purchases or redemptions during the preceding 12 months, would be equal to 10% or more of the company’s consolidated net worth. The Federal Reserve Board may disapprove such a purchase or redemption if it determines that the proposal would constitute an unsafe and unsound practice, or would violate any law, regulation, Federal Reserve Board order or directive, or any condition imposed by, or written agreement with, the Federal Reserve Board. Such notice and approval is not required for a bank holding company that is as “well capitalized” under applicable regulations of the Federal Reserve Board, that has received a composite “1” or “2” rating, as well as a “satisfactory” rating for management, at its most recent bank holding company examination by the Federal Reserve Board, and that is not the subject of any unresolved supervisory issues.

As a bank holding company, the Company is required to obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board to acquire all, or substantially all, of the assets of any bank or bank holding company. Prior Federal Reserve Board approval is also required for the Company to acquire direct or indirect ownership or control of any voting securities of any bank or bank holding company if, after giving effect to such acquisition, it would, directly or indirectly, own or control more than 5% of any class of voting shares of such bank or bank holding company.

In addition, a bank holding company that does not elect to be a financial holding company under federal regulations is generally prohibited from engaging in, or acquiring direct or indirect control of any company engaged in non-banking activities. One of the principal exceptions to this prohibition is for activities found by the Federal Reserve Board to be so closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks. Some of the principal activities that the Federal Reserve Board has determined by regulation to be closely related to banking are:


•	making or servicing loans;


•	performing certain data processing services;


•	providing discount brokerage services; or acting as fiduciary, investment or financial advisor;


•	leasing personal or real property; and


•	making investments in corporations or projects designed primarily to promote community welfare.

A bank holding company that elects to be a financial holding company may engage in activities that are financial in nature or incident to activities which are financial in nature. The Company has not elected to be a financial holding company, although it may seek to do so in the future. A bank holding company may elect to become a financial holding company if:


•	each of its depository institution subsidiaries is “well capitalized”;


•	each of its depository institution subsidiaries is “well managed”;


•	each of its depository institution subsidiaries has at least a “satisfactory” Community Reinvestment Act rating at its most recent examination; and


•	the bank holding company has filed a certification with the Federal Reserve Board stating that it elects to become a financial holding company.

Under federal law, depository institutions are liable to the FDIC for losses suffered or anticipated by the FDIC in connection with the default of a commonly controlled depository institution, or for any assistance provided by the FDIC to such an institution in danger of default. This law would potentially be applicable to the Company if it ever acquired as a separate subsidiary a depository institution in addition to the Bank.

The Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994, as amended by Section 613 of the Dodd-Frank Act, regulates interstate banking activities by establishing a framework for nationwide interstate banking and branching. As amended, this interstate banking and branching authority generally permits a bank in one state to establish a de novo branch at a location in another host state if state banks chartered in such host state would also be permitted to establish a branch at that location in the state. Under these amendments, the Bank is permitted to establish branch offices in other states in addition to its existing New Jersey and New York branch offices.

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 eliminated most of the barriers to affiliations among banks, securities firms, insurance companies, and other financial companies previously imposed under federal banking laws if certain criteria are satisfied. Certain subsidiaries of well-capitalized and well-managed banks may be treated as “financial subsidiaries,” which are generally permitted to engage in activities that are financial in nature, including securities underwriting, dealing, and market making; sponsoring mutual funds and investment companies, and other activities that the Federal Reserve has determined to be closely related to banking.

New Jersey Regulation. Under the New Jersey Banking Act, a company owning or controlling a bank is regulated as a bank holding company. The New Jersey Banking Act defines the terms “company” and “bank holding company” as such terms

Table of Contents

are defined under the BHCA. Each bank holding company controlling a New Jersey-chartered bank must file certain reports with the Commissioner and is subject to examination by the Commissioner.

Acquisition of Investors Bancorp, Inc. Under federal law and under the New Jersey Banking Act, no person may acquire control of the Company or the Bank without first obtaining approval of such acquisition of control by the Federal Reserve Board and the Commissioner.

Federal Securities Laws. The Company’s common stock is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Company is subject to the information, proxy solicitation, insider trading restrictions and other requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

The Company’s common stock held by persons who are affiliates (generally officers, directors and principal stockholders) of the Company may not be resold without registration or unless sold in accordance with certain resale restrictions. If the Company meets specified current public information requirements, each affiliate of the Company is able to sell in the public market, without registration, a limited number of shares in any three-month period.

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was enacted to address, among other issues, corporate governance, auditing and accounting, executive compensation, and enhanced and timely disclosure of corporate information.

As directed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer are required to certify that our quarterly and annual reports do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact. The rules adopted by the SEC under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act have several requirements, including having these officers certify that: they are responsible for establishing, maintaining and regularly evaluating the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; they have made certain disclosures to our auditors and the audit committee of the Board of Directors about our internal control over financial reporting; and they have included information in our quarterly and annual reports about their evaluation and whether there have been changes in our internal control over financial reporting or in other factors that could materially affect internal control over financial reporting. We have existing policies, procedures and systems designed to comply with these regulations.

Taxation

Federal Taxation

General. The Company and its subsidiary are subject to federal income taxation in the same general manner as other corporations, with some exceptions discussed below. The Company and its subsidiary file a consolidated federal income tax return. On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Act”) was enacted. The legislation reduced the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017 and has impacted the manner in which the Company is taxed, including but not limited to, the repeal of the alternative minimum tax on corporations for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. The Company’s 2014 and 2015 federal tax returns are currently under examination with respect to amended returns filed by the Company.

The following discussion of federal taxation is intended only to summarize certain pertinent federal income tax matters and is not a comprehensive description of the tax rules applicable to the Company or its subsidiary.

Method of Accounting. For federal income tax purposes, the Company currently reports its income and expenses on the accrual method of accounting and uses a tax year ending December 31 for filing its federal and state income tax returns.

Bad Debt Reserves. Historically, the Bank was subject to special provisions in the tax law regarding allowable bad debt tax deductions and related reserves. Tax law changes were enacted in 1996 pursuant to the Small Business Protection Act of 1996 (the “1996 Act”), which eliminated the use of the percentage of taxable income method for tax years after 1995 and required recapture into taxable income over a six-year period of all bad debt reserves accumulated after 1987. The Bank has fully recaptured its post-1987 reserve balance. Currently, the Bank uses the specific charge off method to account for bad debt deductions for income tax purposes.

Taxable Distributions and Recapture. Prior to the 1996 Act, bad debt reserves created prior to January 1, 1988 (pre-base year reserves) were subject to recapture into taxable income if the Bank failed to meet certain thrift asset and definitional tests. As a result of the 1996 Act, bad debt reserves accumulated after 1987 are required to be recaptured into income over a six-year period. However, all pre-base year reserves are subject to recapture if the Bank makes certain non-dividend distributions, repurchases any of its stock, pays dividends in excess of tax earnings and profits, or ceases to maintain a bank charter. At December 31, 2019, the Bank’s total federal pre-base year reserve was approximately $45.2 million.

Table of Contents

Net Operating Loss Carryovers. A corporation may carry forward net operating losses arising in tax years ending after December 31, 2017 indefinitely, subject to a deduction limitation of 80% of taxable income in a given year. However, net operating losses arising in tax years on or before December 31, 2017 are not subject to the 80% limitation deduction. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had total federal net operating loss carryforwards of $5.1 million related to prior acquisitions, arising in tax years prior to December 31, 2017.

Corporate Dividends-Received Deduction. The Company may exclude from its federal taxable income 100% of dividends received from the Bank as a wholly owned subsidiary. The corporate dividends-received deduction is 65% when the dividend is received from a corporation having at least 20% of its stock owned by the recipient corporation. A 50% dividends-received deduction is available for dividends received from a corporation having less than 20% of its stock owned by the recipient corporation.

State Taxation

New Jersey State Taxation. Generally, the income of corporations and savings institutions in New Jersey, which is calculated based on federal taxable income, subject to certain adjustments, and allocable to New Jersey is subject to New Jersey tax at a rate of 9.0%. On July 1, 2018, Assembly Bill 4202 was signed into law, providing significant revisions to New Jersey’s Corporation Business Tax laws. Among the changes provided for in the new legislation was a surtax, an additional imposition of tax, on corporate taxpayers that have allocated New Jersey net income in excess of $1 million. For tax years 2018 and 2019, the surtax was imposed at a rate of 2.5%; and for tax years 2020 and 2021, the surtax rate will be 1.5%.

In addition, the law mandated combined reporting for tax years ending on or after July 31, 2019. In December 2019, a technical bulletin was issued by the State of New Jersey providing clarification on mandatory combined reporting, excluding investment companies and real estate investment trusts. The Company and two of its indirect subsidiaries meet the definition of these entity types and therefore are excluded from combined filing with the Company’s other affiliates and are required to file standalone returns.

Prior to the issuance of the technical bulletin, the Company believed it would file a combined tax return for 2019 and therefore fully utilize its charitable contributions carried over from prior years as the recently reformed New Jersey tax law allows for charitable contributions of a member entity to be subtracted from the combined group’s entire net income. However, due to the clarification, the Company will be excluded from the combined group, and therefore it is unable to fully deduct the charitable contributions. At December 31, 2019, the Company did not establish another valuation allowance and instead wrote off the state tax effect of the $9.7 million charitable contribution as it expired in 2019.

New York State Taxation. The New York State corporate franchise tax is based on the federal consolidated taxable income of the Company and its affiliates allocable and apportionable to New York State and taxed at a rate of 6.5%. The amount of revenues that are sourced to New York State can be expected to fluctuate over time. In addition, the Company and its affiliates are subject to the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (“MTA”) Surcharge allocable to business activities carried on in the Metropolitan Commuter Transportation District. The MTA surcharge for 2019 was 28.9% of a recomputed New York State franchise tax, calculated using a 6.5% tax rate on allocated and apportioned entire net income. The Bank is currently under audit with respect to its New York State combined franchise tax return for tax years 2015 through 2017.

New York City Taxation. The Company and its affiliates are subject to the combined corporate tax for New York City calculated on a similar basis as the New York State franchise tax, subject to the New York City apportionment rules.

Pennsylvania Taxation. Considered a mutual thrift institution conducting business in Pennsylvania, the Bank is subject to the mutual thrift institutions tax. The mutual thrift institutions tax is imposed at the rate of 11.5% on apportionable net taxable income and is required to be reported and filed on the annual Net Income Tax Report. Mutual thrift institutions are exempt from all other Pennsylvania corporate taxes.

Delaware State Taxation. As a Delaware holding company not earning income in Delaware, the Company is exempted from Delaware corporate income tax but is required to file annual returns and pay annual fees and an annual franchise tax to the State of Delaware.

Other State Taxation. To a lesser extent, the Company receives income from customers in other states. The Company’s filing obligations with respect to the receipts vary from state to state and depend upon the reporting requirements in the various jurisdictions.

Table of Contents



ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS

The risks set forth below, in addition to the other risks described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, may adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results. In addition to the risks set forth below and the other risks described in this annual report, there may also be additional risks and uncertainties that are not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial that could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or operating results. As a result, past financial performance may not be a reliable indicator of future performance, and historical trends should not be used to anticipate results or trends in future periods. Further, to the extent that any of the information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K constitutes forward-looking statements, the risk factors set forth below also are cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of us.

We operate in a highly regulated environment and may be adversely affected by changes in laws and regulations.

The Bank is subject to extensive regulation, supervision and examination by the NJDOBI, our chartering authority, by the FDIC, as insurer of our deposits, and by the CFPB, with respect to consumer protection laws. As a bank holding company, the Company is subject to regulation and oversight by the Federal Reserve Board. Such regulation and supervision govern the activities in which a bank and its holding company may engage and are intended primarily for the protection of the insurance fund and depositors. These regulatory authorities have extensive discretion in connection with their supervisory and enforcement activities, including the requirement for additional capital, the imposition of restrictions on our operations, restrictions on our ability to pay dividends and make other capital distributions to shareholders, restrictions on our ability to repurchase shares, the classification of our assets and the adequacy of our allowance for loan losses, compliance and privacy issues, BSA and AML compliance, and approval of merger transactions. Any change in such regulation and oversight, whether in the form of regulatory policy, regulations, or legislation, could have a material impact on the Bank, the Company and our operations.

The potential exists for additional Federal or state laws and regulations regarding capital requirements, lending and funding practices and liquidity standards, and bank regulatory agencies are expected to remain active in responding to concerns and trends identified in examinations, including the potential issuance of formal enforcement orders. New laws, regulations, and other legal and regulatory changes, along with negative developments in the financial industry and the domestic and international credit markets, could increase our costs of regulatory compliance and may significantly affect the markets in which we do business, the markets for and value of our loans and investments, and our ongoing operations, costs and profitability.

If the bank regulators impose limitations on our commercial real estate lending activities, our earnings, dividend paying capacity and/or ability to repurchase shares could be adversely affected.

In 2006, the FDIC, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (collectively, the “Agencies”) issued joint guidance entitled “Concentrations in Commercial Real Estate Lending, Sound Risk Management Practices” (the “CRE Guidance”). Although the CRE Guidance did not establish specific lending limits, it provides that a bank’s commercial real estate lending exposure may receive increased supervisory scrutiny where total non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans, including loans secured by apartment buildings, investor commercial real estate and construction and land loans, represent 300% or more of an institution’s total risk-based capital and the outstanding balance of the commercial real estate loan portfolio has increased by 50% or more during the preceding 36 months. Our level of non-owner occupied commercial real estate equaled 544% of Bank total risk-based capital at December 31, 2019, however our commercial real estate loan portfolio increased by only 16% during the preceding 36 months.

In December 2015, the Agencies released a new statement on prudent risk management for commercial real estate lending (the “2015 Statement”). In the 2015 Statement, the Agencies express concerns about easing commercial real estate underwriting standards, direct financial institutions to maintain underwriting discipline and exercise risk management practices to identify, measure and monitor lending risks, and indicate that the Agencies will continue “to pay special attention” to commercial real estate lending activities and concentrations going forward. If the FDIC, the Bank’s primary federal regulator were to impose restrictions on the amount of commercial real estate loans we can hold in our portfolio, or require higher capital ratios as a result of the level of commercial real estate loans we hold, our earnings, dividend paying capacity and/or ability to repurchase shares would be adversely affected.

Table of Contents

If our allowance for loan losses is not sufficient to cover actual loan losses, our earnings could decrease.

We make various assumptions and judgments about the collectability of our loan portfolio, including the creditworthiness of our borrowers and the value of the real estate and other assets serving as collateral for the repayment of many of our loans. In determining the amount of the allowance for loan losses, we review our loans and our loss and delinquency experience, and we evaluate economic conditions. If actual results differ significantly from our assumptions, our allowance for loan losses may not be sufficient to cover losses inherent in our loan portfolio, resulting in additions to our allowance. Bank regulators also periodically review our loan portfolio, the allowance for loan losses, and our assumptions underlying the determinations we have made regarding the allowance for loan losses, and as a result can require us to increase our provision for loan losses or recognize further loan charge-offs.

The FASB has issued an accounting standard update that will result in a significant change in how we recognize credit losses and may have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

In June 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard update, “Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326), Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,” which replaces the current “incurred loss” model for recognizing credit losses with an “expected loss” model referred to as the CECL model. Under the CECL model, we will be required to present certain financial assets carried at amortized cost, such as loans held for investment and held-to-maturity debt securities, at the net amount expected to be collected. The measurement of expected credit losses is to be based on information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount. This measurement will take place at the time the financial asset is first added to the balance sheet and periodically thereafter. This differs significantly from the “incurred loss” model required under current GAAP, which delays recognition until it is probable a loss has been incurred. The CECL model may create more volatility in the provision as well as the level of our allowance for loan losses.

Because we intend to continue to increase our commercial originations, our credit risk will increase.

At December 31, 2019, our portfolio of multi-family, commercial real estate, C&I and construction loans totaled $15.86 billion, or 73.1% of our total loans. We intend to continue to increase our originations of multi-family, commercial real estate, C&I and construction loans, which generally have more risk than one- to four-family residential mortgage loans. Since repayment of commercial loans depends on the successful management and operation of the borrower’s properties or related businesses, repayment of such loans can be affected by adverse conditions in the real estate market, local economy or the management of the business or property. In addition, our commercial borrowers may have more than one loan outstanding with us. Consequently, an adverse development with respect to one loan or one credit relationship can expose us to significantly greater risk of loss compared to an adverse development with respect to a one- to four-family residential mortgage loan. Because we plan to continue to increase our originations of these loans, it may be necessary to increase the level of our allowance for loan losses because of the increased risk characteristics associated with these types of loans. Any such increase to our allowance for loan losses would adversely affect our earnings.

Significant portions of our multi-family loan portfolio and commercial real estate portfolio and nearly all of our C&I loan portfolio are unseasoned. It is difficult to judge the future performance of unseasoned loans.

Our multi-family loan portfolio has increased to $7.81 billion at December 31, 2019 from $6.26 billion at December 31, 2015. Our commercial real estate portfolio has increased to $4.83 billion at December 31, 2019 from $3.83 billion at December 31, 2015. Our C&I loan portfolio has increased to $2.95 billion at December 31, 2019 from $1.04 billion at December 31, 2015. Consequently, a large portion of our multi-family loans and commercial real estate loans and nearly all of our C&I loans are unseasoned. It is difficult to assess the future performance of these recently originated loans because of their relatively limited payment history from which to judge future collectability, especially in the economic environment since 2015. These loans may experience higher delinquency or charge-off levels than our historical loan portfolio experience, which could adversely affect our future performance.

Table of Contents

We continue to expand our commercial lending efforts and footprint, which may expose us to increased lending risks and may have a negative effect on our results of operations.

In an effort to diversify our loan portfolio, we have expanded our commercial lending team to include leveraged lending and equipment finance teams, as well as a healthcare lending team that originate loans nationally. We will continue to explore other markets within commercial lending. These types of loans generally have a higher risk of loss compared to our one- to four-family residential real estate loans and multi-family loans, which could have a negative effect on our results of operations. In addition, some of our equipment finance portfolio relies on the residual values of the underlying equipment and therefore could be negatively impacted by a change in valuation. Because we are not as experienced with these new loan products and areas, we may incur losses or require additional time and resources for offering and managing such products effectively.

We will be required to transition from the use of LIBOR in the future.

On July 27, 2017, the Chief Executive of the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates LIBOR, announced that it intends to stop persuading or compelling banks to submit rates for the calibration of LIBOR to the administrator of LIBOR after 2021. The continuation of LIBOR cannot be guaranteed after 2021. At this time, no consensus exists as to what rate or rates may become acceptable alternatives to LIBOR and it is impossible to predict the effect of any such alternatives on the value of LIBOR-based securities and variable rate loans, subordinated debentures, or other securities or financial arrangements, given LIBOR's role in determining market interest rates globally. Uncertainty as to the nature of alternative reference rates and as to potential changes or other reforms to LIBOR may adversely affect LIBOR rates and the value of LIBOR-based loans and securities in our portfolio, and may impact the availability and cost of hedging instruments and borrowings. The Company has approximately $5.00 billion in financial instruments which are indexed to USD-LIBOR. If LIBOR rates are no longer available and we are required to implement substitute indices for the calculation of interest rates, we may incur expenses in effecting the transition, and may be subject to disputes or litigation with customers and security holders over the appropriateness or comparability to LIBOR of the substitute indices, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations. In the interim, we have established a cross-functional team to develop initial transition plans to address potential revisions to documentation, as well as customer management and communication, internal training, financial, operational and risk management implications, and legal and contract management. In addition, we have engaged with our regulators and with industry working groups and trade associations to develop strategies for transitioning away from LIBOR.

Our liabilities reprice faster than our assets and future increases in interest rates will reduce our profits.

Our ability to make a profit largely depends on our net interest income, which could be negatively affected by changes in interest rates. Net interest income is the difference between the interest income we earn on our interest-earning assets, such as loans and securities; and the interest expense we pay on our interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings.

The interest income we earn on our assets and the interest expense we pay on our liabilities are generally fixed for a contractual period of time. Our liabilities generally have shorter contractual maturities than our assets. This imbalance can create significant earnings volatility, because market interest rates change over time. In periods of rising and/or flattening interest rates, the interest income earned on our assets may not increase as rapidly as the interest paid on our liabilities. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Management of Market Risk.”

In addition, changes in interest rates can affect the average life of loans and mortgage-backed and related securities. Increases in interest rates may decrease loan demand and/or make it more difficult for borrowers to repay adjustable-rate loans. An increase in interest rates can also result in decreased prepayment of loans and mortgage-backed and related securities. Conversely, a decrease in interest rates may cause increased prepayments of loans and mortgage-backed and related securities as borrowers refinance their debt to reduce their borrowing costs. This creates reinvestment risk, which is the risk that we may not be able to reinvest the funds from faster prepayments at rates that are comparable to the rates we earned on the prepaid loans or securities.

Changes in interest rates also affect the current market value of our interest-earning securities portfolio. Generally, the value of securities moves inversely with changes in interest rates. At December 31, 2019, the fair value of our total securities portfolio was $3.89 billion. Unrealized net losses on debt securities available-for-sale are reported as a separate component of equity. To the extent interest rates increase and the value of our available-for-sale portfolio decreases, our stockholders’ equity will be adversely affected.

We evaluate interest rate sensitivity using models that estimate net interest income sensitivity and the change in our economic value of equity over a range of interest rate scenarios. The economic value of equity analysis is the discounted present value of expected cash flows from assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet contracts. At December 31, 2019, in the event of a 200 basis point increase in interest rates, whereby rates increase evenly over a twelve-month period, and assuming management took no action to mitigate the effect of such change, the model projects that we would experience a 5.1% or $34.2 million decrease

Table of Contents

in net interest income. In a 200 basis point instantaneous increase in interest rates scenario, the model projects a 10.8% or $400.1 million decrease in economic value of equity.

A flat or inverted yield curve may adversely affect our net interest income and profitability.

During the past several years it has been the policy of the Federal Reserve Board to maintain interest rates at historically low levels. As a result, market rates on the loans we have originated and the yields on securities we have purchased have been at historically lower levels. A flat yield curve combined with low interest rates generally leads to lower revenue and reduced margins because it tends to limit our ability to increase the spread between asset yields and funding costs. Sustained periods of time with a flat yield curve coupled with low interest rates, or an inversion of the yield curve, could have a material adverse effect on our net interest margin and earnings.

We may not be able to continue to grow our business, which may adversely impact our results of operations.

Our total assets have grown from approximately $20.89 billion at December 31, 2015 to $26.70 billion at December 31, 2019. Our business strategy calls for continued growth. Our ability to continue to grow depends, in part, upon our ability to successfully attract deposits, identify favorable loan and investment opportunities, acquire other banks and non-bank entities and enhance our market presence. In the event that we do not continue to grow, our results of operations could be adversely impacted.

Our ability to grow successfully will depend on whether we can continue to fund this growth while maintaining cost controls and asset quality, remain in good standing with our regulators, as well as on factors beyond our control, such as national and regional economic conditions and interest rate trends. If we are not able to control costs and maintain asset quality, such growth could adversely impact our earnings and financial condition.

Public funds deposits are an important source of funds for us and a reduced level of those deposits may hurt our profits and liquidity position.

Public funds deposits are a significant source of funds for our lending and investment activities. At December 31, 2019, $4.89 billion, or 27.4% of our total deposits, consisted of public funds deposits from local government entities, predominately domiciled in the state of New Jersey, such as townships, school districts, hospital districts, sheriff departments and other municipalities, which are collateralized by letters of credit from the FHLB and investment securities. Given our use of these high-average balance public funds deposits as a source of funds, our inability to retain such funds could adversely affect our liquidity. Further, our public funds deposits are primarily interest-bearing demand deposit accounts or short-term time deposits and are therefore more sensitive to interest rate risks. If we are forced to pay higher rates on our public funds accounts to retain those funds, or if we are unable to retain such funds and we are forced to resort to other sources of funds for our lending and investment activities, such as borrowings from the FHLB, the interest expense associated with these other funding sources may be higher than the rates we are currently paying on our public funds deposits, which would adversely affect our net income.

Public funds deposits are an important source of funds for us and legislation concerning a State-chartered bank in New Jersey could challenge our overall strategies and potentially reduce the level of public fund deposits.

At December 31, 2019, we had $4.89 billion in municipal deposits from various municipalities and other governmental entities. Such deposits are generally used to fund our loans and investments. In addition, the State of New Jersey is considering creating a State Bank, whose purpose would be to promote economic development, commerce, and industry in the State. It intends to permit State funds, including funds from State institutions and any State public source, to be held by the State Bank. Given the degree of our funding reliance on New Jersey-based municipal deposits and the potential lending ability of the proposed State Bank, we are uncertain of the impact this proposal may have on us. The possible loss of public funds on deposit may increase the costs of our funding needs, which could have a negative impact on our net income and negatively impact liquidity. The proposed legislation was first introduced in 2018, and in 2019, the Governor of New Jersey signed an executive order establishing an implementation board to develop criteria for establishing a State Bank. At this time, there is no assurance that a State Bank will be established or what its powers or authority may be.

We could be required to repurchase mortgage loans or indemnify mortgage loan purchasers due to breaches of representations and warranties, borrower fraud, or certain borrower defaults, which could have an adverse impact on our liquidity, results of operations and financial condition.

We sell into the secondary market a portion of the residential mortgage loans that we originate. The whole loan sale agreements we enter into in connection with such loan sales require us to repurchase or substitute mortgage loans in the event there is a breach of any of representations or warranties. In addition, we may be required to repurchase mortgage loans as a result of borrower fraud or in the event of early payment default of the borrower on a mortgage loan. We have established a reserve for estimated repurchase and indemnification obligations on the residential mortgage loans that we sell. We make various assumptions

Table of Contents

and judgments in determining this reserve. If our assumptions are incorrect, our reserve may not be sufficient to cover losses from repurchase and indemnification obligations related to our residential loans sold. Such event would have an adverse effect on our earnings.

FHLB funds are an important source of funding for the Company and a reduced level may have an adverse impact on our liquidity, results of operations and financial condition.

We borrow directly from the FHLB and various financial institutions. Our financial flexibility will be severely constrained if we are unable to maintain our access to funding or if adequate financing is not available to accommodate future growth at acceptable interest rates. If we are unable to secure alternative funding or need to rely on more expensive funding sources, our operating margins, profitability and liquidity would be negatively impacted.

We may incur impairments to goodwill.

At December 31, 2019, we had approximately $82.5 million recorded as goodwill. We evaluate goodwill for impairment, at least annually. Significant negative industry or economic trends, including declines in the market price of our common stock, reduced estimates of future cash flows or disruptions to our business, could result in impairments to goodwill. We operate in competitive environments and projections of future operating results and cash flows may vary significantly from actual results. If our analysis results in impairment to goodwill, we would be required to record an impairment charge to earnings in our financial statements during the period in which such impairment is determined to exist. Any such change could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

A worsening of national or local economic conditions could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Deteriorating economic or business conditions could significantly affect the markets in which we do business, the value of our loans and investments, and our on-going operations, costs and profitability. Declines in real estate values and sales volumes and unemployment levels, particularly in New York and New Jersey given our concentration in this region, may result in greater loan delinquencies, increases in our nonperforming, criticized and classified assets and a decline in demand for our products and services. These events may cause us to incur losses and may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. The majority of our loan portfolio is secured by real estate in New York and New Jersey.

The performance of our multi-family and commercial real estate loan portfolios could be adversely impacted by recent or proposed changes in laws and regulation.

On June 14, 2019, the State of New York enacted legislation increasing restrictions on rent increases in a rent-regulated apartment building, including, among other provisions, (i) repealing the “vacancy bonus” and “longevity bonus”, which allowed a property owner to raise rents as much as 20% each time a rental unit became vacant, (ii) eliminating high rent vacancy deregulation and high-income deregulation, which allowed a rental unit to be removed from rent stabilization once it crossed a statutory high-rent threshold and became vacant, or the tenant’s income exceeded the statutory amount in the preceding two years, and (iii) eliminating an exception that allowed a property owner who offered preferential rents to tenants to raise the rent to the full legal rent upon renewal. As a result of this new legislation as well as previously existing laws and regulations, which are outside the control of the borrower or the Bank, the value of the collateral for our multi-family loans or the future cash flow of such properties could be impaired. It is possible that rental income might not rise sufficiently over time to satisfy increases in the loan rate at repricing or increases in overhead expenses (e.g., utilities, taxes, etc.). In addition, if the cash flow from a collateral property is reduced or constrained, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan and the value of the collateral for the loan may be impaired.

Our inability to achieve profitability on new branches may negatively affect our earnings.

We have expanded our presence throughout our market area and may pursue further expansion through de novo branching or the purchase of branches from other financial institutions. The profitability of our expansion strategy will depend on whether the income that we generate from the new branches will offset the increased expenses resulting from operating these branches. We expect that it may take a period of time before these branches can become profitable, especially in areas in which we do not have an established presence. During this period, the expense of operating these branches may negatively affect our net income.

Growing by acquisition entails integration and certain other risks.

Although we have successfully integrated business acquisitions in recent years, failure to successfully integrate systems subsequent to the completion of any future acquisitions could have a material impact on the operations of the Bank.

Table of Contents

Future acquisition activity could dilute book value.

Both nationally and in our region, the banking industry is undergoing consolidation marked by numerous mergers and acquisitions. From time to time we may be presented with opportunities to acquire institutions and/or bank branches and we may engage in discussions and negotiations. Acquisitions typically involve the payment of a premium over book and trading values, and therefore, may result in the dilution of our book value per share.

Capital requirements for financial institutions have increased in recent years, which may adversely impact our return on equity, or constrain us from paying dividends or repurchasing shares.

In 2015, the FDIC and the Federal Reserve Board instituted a new rule which substantially amended the regulatory risk-based capital rules applicable to the Bank and the Company. This rule implemented the “Basel III” regulatory capital reforms and changes required by the Dodd-Frank Act.

The rule included new minimum risk-based capital and leverage ratios, and refines the definition of what constitutes “capital” for purposes of calculating these ratios. The new minimum capital requirements are: (i) a new common equity Tier 1 to risk-based capital ratio of 4.5%; (ii) a Tier 1 to risk-based assets capital ratio of 6% (increased from 4% under prior rules); (iii) a total capital to risk-based assets ratio of 8%; and (iv) a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4%. The rule also established a “capital conservation buffer” of 2.5% of common equity Tier 1 capital, and resulted in the following minimum ratios: (i) a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 7.0%; (ii) a Tier 1 to risk-based assets capital ratio of 8.5%; and (iii) a total capital to risk-based assets ratio of 10.5%. The required minimum capital conservation buffer increased in annual increments to 2.5% on January 1, 2019, which is the fully phased in conservation buffer. An institution will be subject to limitations on paying dividends, engaging in share repurchases, and paying discretionary bonuses if its capital level falls below the buffer amount. These limitations will establish a maximum percentage of eligible retained income that can be utilized for such actions.

The application of these more stringent capital requirements for the Bank and the Company could, among other things, result in lower returns on equity, require the raising of additional capital, and result in regulatory actions constraining us from paying dividends or repurchasing shares if we were to be unable to comply with such requirements.

We may be adversely affected by changes in tax laws and regulations.

The Tax Act had both positive and negative effects on our financial performance. The new legislation resulted in a reduction in our federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% beginning in 2018, which had a favorable impact on our earnings and capital generation abilities. However, the new legislation also enacted limitations on certain deductions, such as the deduction of FDIC deposit insurance premiums and executive compensation, which partially offset the anticipated increase in net earnings from the lower tax rate. In addition, under ASC 740, Income Taxes, companies are required to recognize the effect of tax law changes in the period of enactment. As a result of the lower corporate tax rate, the resulting impact of the re-measurement of the Company’s deferred tax balances was $49.2 million, which was recorded as a tax expense in the fourth quarter of 2017. The impact of the Tax Act may differ from the foregoing, possibly materially, due to changes in interpretations or in assumptions that we have made, guidance or regulations that may be promulgated, and other actions that we may take as a result of the Tax Act. Similarly, the Bank’s customers are likely to experience varying effects from both the individual and business tax provisions of the Tax Act and such effects, whether positive or negative, may have a corresponding impact on our business and the economy as a whole. We are subject to changes in tax law that could increase our effective tax rates. These law changes may be retroactive to previous periods and as a result could negatively affect our current and future financial performance.

We currently utilize incentive-based payment arrangements with our employees as compensation practices. Potential regulatory changes to this practice could have an impact on our current practices and impact our results of operations.

The Bank is subject to the compensation-related provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act which prohibit incentive-based payment arrangements that encourage inappropriate risk taking. The scope and content of the U.S. banking regulators’ policies on incentive compensation are continuing to develop and are likely to continue evolving in the future.

Strong competition within our market area may limit our growth and profitability.

Competition in the banking and financial services and non-bank industry is intense. In our market area, we compete with numerous commercial banks, savings institutions, mortgage brokerage firms, credit unions, finance companies, mutual funds, insurance companies, and brokerage and investment banking firms operating locally and elsewhere. In addition, we compete with numerous online financial service providers who compete in the new digital fintech marketplace and who may not be subject to our regulatory requirements. Some of our competitors have substantially greater resources and lending limits than we have, have greater name recognition and market presence that benefit them in attracting business, and offer certain services that we do not or cannot provide. In addition, larger bank and non-bank competitors may be able to price loans and deposits more aggressively than we can. Our profitability depends upon our continued ability to successfully compete in our market area. The greater resources

Table of Contents

and deposit and loan products offered by some of our competitors may limit our ability to increase our interest-earning assets. For additional information see “Item 1. Business.”

Any future increase in FDIC insurance premiums will adversely impact our earnings.

As a “large institution” within the meaning of FDIC regulations (i.e., greater than $10 billion in assets), the Bank’s deposit insurance premium is determined differently than smaller banks. Small banks are assessed based on a risk classification determined by examination ratings, financial ratios and certain specified adjustments. Large institutions are subject to assessment based upon a more detailed scorecard approach involving (i) a performance score determined using forward-looking risk measures, including certain stress testing, and (ii) a loss severity score, which is designed to measure, based on modeling, potential loss to the FDIC insurance fund if the institution failed. The total score is converted to an assessment rate, subject to certain adjustments, with institutions deemed riskier paying higher assessments.

We may eliminate dividends on our common stock.

Although we pay quarterly cash dividends to our stockholders, stockholders are not entitled to receive dividends. Downturns in domestic and global economies and other factors could cause our board of directors to consider, among other things, the elimination of or reduction in the amount and/or frequency of cash dividends paid on our common stock.

We could be adversely affected by failure in our internal controls.

We continue to devote a significant amount of effort, time and resources to continually strengthen our controls and ensure compliance with complex accounting standards and banking regulations. A failure in our internal controls could have a significant negative impact not only on our earnings, but also on the perception that customers, regulators and investors may have of us.

Our failure to effectively deploy capital may have an adverse effect on our financial performance.

We invested 50% of the net proceeds from our second step conversion offering in the Bank; provided funding to our Employee Stock Ownership Plan for the purchase of 6,617,421 shares of common stock sold in the offering; and contributed $20.0 million to Investors Charitable foundation by issuing 1,000,000 shares and a $10.0 million cash contribution. A substantial portion of the net proceeds were used to pay off short-term borrowings as they matured and invest in securities. We continue to utilize the remainder of the net proceeds for general corporate purposes, including, among other items, paying cash dividends and repurchasing shares of our common stock. Our failure to deploy the capital effectively may reduce our profitability and may adversely affect the value of our common stock.

In December 2019, we entered into a purchase and sale agreement with Blue Harbour, pursuant to which we repurchased from Blue Harbour the 27,318,628 shares of our common stock beneficially owned by Blue Harbour, at a purchase price of $12.29 per share, representing aggregate cost of approximately $335.7 million.

Our recruitment efforts may not be sufficient to implement our business strategy and execute successful operations.

As we continue to grow, we may find our recruitment efforts more challenging. If we do not succeed in attracting, hiring, and integrating experienced or qualified personnel, we may not be able to continue to successfully implement our business strategy.

A failure in or breach of our operational or security systems or infrastructure, or those of third parties, could disrupt our businesses, and adversely impact our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition, as well as cause reputational harm.

The Bank collects, processes and stores sensitive consumer data by utilizing computer systems and telecommunications networks operated by both the Bank and third-party service providers. Our operational and security systems, infrastructure, including our computer systems, data management, and internal processes, as well as those of third parties, are integral to our business. We rely on our employees and third parties in our day-to-day and ongoing operations, who may, as a result of human error, misconduct or malfeasance, or failure or breach of third- party systems or infrastructure, expose us to risk. We have taken measures to implement backup systems and other safeguards to support our operations, but our ability to conduct business may be adversely affected by any significant disruptions to us or to third parties with whom we interact. In addition, our ability to implement backup systems and other safeguards with respect to third-party systems is more limited than with our own systems.

We handle a substantial volume of customer and other financial transactions every day. Our financial, accounting, data processing, check processing, electronic funds transfer, loan processing, online and mobile banking, automated teller machines, or ATMs, backup or other operating or security systems and infrastructure may fail to operate properly or become disabled or damaged as a result of a number of factors including events that are wholly or partially beyond our control. This could

Table of Contents

adversely affect our ability to process these transactions or provide these services. There could be sudden increases in customer transaction volume, electrical, telecommunications or other major physical infrastructure outages, natural disasters, events arising from local or larger scale political or social matters, including terrorist acts, and cyber attacks. We continuously update these systems to support our operations and growth. This updating entails significant costs and creates risks associated with implementing new systems and integrating them with existing ones. Operational risk exposures could adversely impact our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition, and cause reputational harm.

A cyber attack, information or security breach, or a technology failure of ours or of a third-party could adversely affect our ability to conduct our business or manage our exposure to risk, result in the disclosure or misuse of confidential or proprietary information, increase our costs to maintain and update our operational and security systems and infrastructure, and adversely impact our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition, as well as cause reputational harm.

Our business is highly dependent on the security and efficacy of our infrastructure, computer and data management systems, as well as those of third parties with whom we interact. Cyber security risks for financial institutions have significantly increased in recent years in part because of the proliferation of new technologies, the use of the Internet and telecommunications technologies to conduct financial transactions, and the increased sophistication and activities of organized crime, hackers, terrorists and other external parties, including foreign state actors. Our operations rely on the secure processing, transmission, storage and retrieval of confidential, proprietary and other information in our computer and data management systems and networks, and in the computer and data management systems and networks of third parties. We rely on digital technologies, computer, database and email systems, software, and networks to conduct our operations. In addition, to access our network, products and services, our customers and third parties may use personal mobile devices or computing devices that are outside of our network environment.

Financial services institutions have been subject to, and are likely to continue to be the target of, cyber attacks, including computer viruses, malicious or destructive code, phishing attacks, denial of service or other security breaches that could result in the unauthorized release, gathering, monitoring, misuse, loss or destruction of confidential, proprietary and other information of the institution, its employees or customers or of third parties, or otherwise materially disrupt network access or business operations. For example, denial of service attacks have been launched against a number of large financial institutions and several large retailers have disclosed substantial cyber security breaches affecting debit and credit card accounts of their customers. We have experienced cyber security incidents in the past, although not material, and we anticipate that, as a larger bank, we could experience further incidents. There can be no assurance that we will not suffer material losses or other material consequences relating to technology failure, cyber attacks or other information or security breaches.

Misconduct by employees could also result in fraudulent, improper or unauthorized activities on behalf of clients or improper use of confidential information. The Bank may not be able to prevent employee errors or misconduct, and the precautions the Bank takes to detect this type of activity might not be effective in all cases. Employee errors or misconduct could subject the Bank to civil claims for negligence or regulatory enforcement actions, including fines and restrictions on our business.

In addition, there have been instances where financial institutions have been victims of fraudulent activity in which criminals pose as customers to initiate wire and automated clearinghouse transactions out of customer accounts. The recent massive breach of the systems of a credit bureau presents additional threats as criminals now have more information about a larger portion of the population of the United States than past breaches have involved, which could be used by criminals to pose as customers initiating transfers of money from customer accounts. Although the Bank has policies and procedures in place to verify the authenticity of its customers, the Bank cannot assure that such policies and procedures will prevent all fraudulent transfers. Such activity can result in financial liability and harm to our reputation.

As cyber threats and other fraudulent activity continues to evolve, we may be required to expend significant additional resources to continue to modify and enhance our protective measures or to investigate and remediate any information security vulnerabilities or incidents. Any of these matters could result in our loss of customers and business opportunities, significant disruption to our operations and business, misappropriation or destruction of our confidential information and/or that of our customers, or damage to our customers’ and/or third parties’ computers or systems, and could result in a violation of applicable privacy laws and other laws, litigation exposure, regulatory fines, penalties or intervention, loss of confidence in our security measures, reputational damage, reimbursement or other compensatory costs, and additional compliance costs. In addition, any of the matters described above could adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.

Table of Contents

We rely on third-party providers and other suppliers for a number of services that are important to our business. An interruption or cessation of an important service by any third-party could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We are dependent for the majority of our technology, including our core operating system, on third-party providers. If these companies were to discontinue providing services to us, we may experience significant disruption to our business. In addition, each of these third parties faces the risk of cyber attack, information breach or loss, or technology failure. If any of our third-party service providers experience such difficulties, or if there is any other disruption in our relationships with them, we may be required to find alternative sources of such services. We are dependent on these third-party providers securing their information systems, over which we have limited control, and a breach of their information systems could adversely affect our ability to process transactions, service our clients or manage our exposure to risk and could result in the disclosure of sensitive, personal customer information, which could have a material adverse impact on our business through damage to our reputation, loss of business, remedial costs, additional regulatory scrutiny or exposure to civil litigation and possible financial liability. Assurance cannot be provided that we could negotiate terms with alternative service sources that are as favorable or could obtain services with similar functionality as found in existing systems without the need to expend substantial resources, if at all, thereby resulting in a material adverse impact on our business and results of operations.

Severe weather, acts of terrorism and other external events could impact our ability to conduct business.

Weather-related events have adversely impacted our market area in recent years, especially areas located near coastal waters and flood prone areas. Such events that may cause significant flooding and other storm-related damage may become more common events in the future. Financial institutions have been, and continue to be, targets of terrorist threats aimed at compromising operating and communication systems and the metropolitan New York area and Northern New Jersey remain central targets for potential acts of terrorism. Such events could cause significant damage, impact the stability of our facilities and result in additional expenses, impair the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans, reduce the value of collateral securing repayment of our loans, and result in the loss of revenue. While we have established and regularly test disaster recovery procedures, the occurrence of any such event could have a material adverse effect on our business, operations and financial condition.

Additionally, global markets may be adversely affected by natural disasters, the emergence of widespread health emergencies or pandemics, cyber attacks or campaigns, military conflict, terrorism or other geopolitical events. Global market fluctuations may affect our business liquidity. Also, any sudden or prolonged market downturn in the U.S. or abroad, as a result of the above factors or otherwise could result in a decline in revenue and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition, including capital and liquidity levels.



ITEM 1B.	UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.



ITEM 2.	PROPERTIES

At December 31, 2019, the Company and the Bank conducted business from their corporate headquarters in Short Hills, New Jersey, with operation centers located in Iselin, Robbinsville, Dunellen and Millburn, New Jersey as well as lending offices within our primary market areas in Short Hills, Iselin, Robbinsville, Mount Laurel, Spring Lake, Newark, Manhattan, Queens, Brooklyn, Melville, as well as a full-service branch network of 147 offices. We also have lending offices in Danbury, Connecticut and Charlotte, North Carolina.



ITEM 3.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company, the Bank and its subsidiaries are subject to various legal actions arising in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, the resolution of these legal actions is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.



ITEM 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

Table of Contents

Part II



ITEM 5.	MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Our shares of common stock are traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “ISBC”. The approximate number of holders of record of Investors Bancorp, Inc.’s common stock as of February 21, 2020 was approximately 8,000. Certain shares of Investors Bancorp, Inc. are held in “nominee” or “street” name and accordingly, the number of beneficial owners of such shares is not known or included in the foregoing number.

Stock Performance Graph

Set forth below is a stock performance graph comparing (a) the cumulative total return on the Company’s common stock for the period beginning December 31, 2014 through December 31, 2019, (b) the cumulative total return of publicly traded thrifts over such period, and, (c) the cumulative total return of all publicly traded banks and thrifts over such period. Cumulative return assumes the reinvestment of dividends and is expressed in dollars based on an assumed investment of $100.



Index	12/31/2014	12/31/2015	12/31/2016	12/31/2017	12/31/2018	12/31/2019
Investors Bancorp, Inc.	100.00	113.15	129.74	132.26	102.05	121.36
SNL U.S. Bank and Thrift	100.00	102.02	128.80	151.45	125.81	170.04
SNL U.S. Thrift	100.00	112.45	137.74	136.74	115.17	141.80

Source: S&P Global Market Intelligence

Table of Contents

Stock Repurchases

The following table reports information regarding repurchases of our common stock during the quarter ended December 31, 2019 and the stock repurchase plans approved by our Board of Directors.



Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased ^(1)(2)(3)	Average Price paid Per Share		As part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	Yet to be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
October 1, 2019 through October 31, 2019	2,719	$	11.86	—	14,607,794
November 1, 2019 through November 30, 2019	679	$	12.17	—	14,607,794
December 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019	27,318,871	$	12.29	—	14,607,794
Total	27,322,269	$	12.29	—

(1) On October 25, 2018, the Company announced its fourth share repurchase program, which authorized the purchase of 10% of its publicly-held outstanding shares of common stock, or 28,886,780 shares. The plan commenced upon the completion of the third repurchase plan on December 10, 2018. This program has no expiration date and has 14,607,794 shares yet to be repurchased as of December 31, 2019.

(2) 3,641 shares were withheld to cover income taxes related to restricted stock vesting under our 2015 Equity Incentive Plan. Shares withheld to pay income taxes are repurchased pursuant to the terms of the 2015 Equity Incentive Plan and not under our share repurchase program.

(3) In December 2019, we entered into a purchase and sale agreement with Blue Harbour, pursuant to which we repurchased from Blue Harbour the 27,318,628 shares of our common stock beneficially owned by Blue Harbour, at a purchase price of $12.29 per share, representing aggregate cost of approximately $335.7 million. These shares were not repurchased under our share repurchase program.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The information set forth in Item 12 of Part III of this Annual Report under the heading “Equity Compensation Plan Information” is incorporated by reference herein.

Table of Contents



ITEM 6.	SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following information is derived in part from the consolidated financial statements of Investors Bancorp, Inc. For additional information, reference is made to “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the Consolidated Financial Statements of Investors Bancorp, Inc. and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report. Certain reclassifications have been made to conform with current year classifications.



	At December 31,
	2019		2018		2017		2016		2015
	(In thousands)
Selected Financial Condition Data:
Total assets	$	26,698,766	$	26,229,008	$	25,129,244	$	23,174,675	$	20,888,684
Loans receivable, net	21,476,056		21,378,136		19,852,101		18,569,855		16,661,133
Loans held-for-sale	29,797		4,074		5,185		38,298		7,431
Equity securities	6,039		5,793		5,701		6,660		6,495
Debt securities held-to-maturity	1,148,815		1,555,137		1,796,621		1,755,556		1,844,223
Debt securities available-for-sale, at estimated fair value	2,695,390		2,122,162		1,982,026		1,653,773		1,298,202
Bank owned life insurance	218,517		211,914		155,635		161,940		159,152
Deposits	17,860,338		17,580,269		17,357,697		15,280,833		14,063,656
Borrowed funds	5,827,111		5,435,681		4,461,533		4,546,251		3,263,090
Goodwill	82,546		82,546		77,571		77,571		77,571
Stockholders’ equity	2,621,950		3,005,330		3,125,451		3,123,245		3,311,647



	Year Ended December 31,
	2019			2018		2017		2016		2015
	(In thousands)
Selected Operating Data:
Interest and dividend income	$	1,040,219		$	968,416	$	881,683	$	793,521	$	731,723
Interest expense	385,146			288,399		201,907		153,336		136,639
Net interest income	655,073			680,017		679,776		640,185		595,084
Provision for loan losses	(1,000		)	12,000		16,250		19,750		26,000
Net interest income after provision for loan losses	656,073			668,017		663,526		620,435		569,084
Non-interest income	53,413			10,081		35,637		37,201		40,125
Non-interest expenses	422,754			407,680		418,574		358,564		328,332
Income before income tax expense	286,732			270,418		280,589		299,072		280,877
Income tax expense	91,248			67,842		153,845		106,947		99,372
Net income	$	195,484		$	202,576	$	126,744	$	192,125	$	181,505
Earnings per share — basic	$	0.75		$	0.72	$	0.44	$	0.65	$	0.55
Earnings per share — diluted	$	0.74		$	0.72	$	0.43	$	0.64	$	0.55

Table of Contents



	At or for the Year Ended December 31,
	2019			2018			2017			2016			2015
Selected Financial Ratios and Other Data:
Performance Ratios:
Return on assets (ratio of net income to average total assets)	0.73		%	0.80		%	0.52		%	0.88		%	0.92		%
Return on equity (ratio of net income to average equity)	6.64		%	6.57		%	4.00		%	6.06		%	5.26		%
Net interest rate spread ⁽¹⁾	2.19		%	2.46		%	2.67		%	2.83		%	2.91		%
Net interest margin ⁽²⁾	2.54		%	2.76		%	2.89		%	3.04		%	3.12		%
Efficiency ratio ⁽³⁾	59.67		%	59.08		%	58.51		%	52.93		%	51.69		%
Non-interest expenses to average total assets	1.58		%	1.61		%	1.73		%	1.64		%	1.66		%
Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities	1.23x			1.25x			1.26x			1.29x			1.30x
Dividend payout ratio ⁽⁴⁾	58.67		%	52.78		%	75.00		%	40.00		%	45.45		%
Cash dividends paid	$	0.44		$	0.38		$	0.33		$	0.26		$	0.25
Asset Quality Ratios:
Non-performing assets to total assets	0.46		%	0.55		%	0.61		%	0.47		%	0.69		%
Non-accrual loans to total loans	0.44		%	0.58		%	0.68		%	0.50		%	0.68		%
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans ⁽⁵⁾	210.70		%	170.22		%	157.46		%	220.18		%	158.43		%
Allowance for loan losses to total loans	1.05		%	1.09		%	1.15		%	1.21		%	1.29		%
Capital Ratios:
Tier 1 leverage ratio ⁽⁶⁾	8.22		%	10.28		%	11.00		%	12.03		%	12.41		%
Common equity tier 1 risk-based ⁽⁶⁾	11.03		%	13.41		%	13.94		%	14.75		%	15.87		%
Tier 1 risk-based capital ⁽⁶⁾	11.03		%	13.41		%	13.94		%	14.75		%	15.87		%
Total-risk-based capital ⁽⁶⁾	12.18		%	14.60		%	15.13		%	15.99		%	17.12		%
Equity to total assets	9.82		%	11.46		%	12.44		%	13.48		%	15.85		%
Tangible equity to tangible assets ⁽⁷⁾	9.49		%	11.12		%	12.10		%	13.10		%	15.43		%
Average equity to average assets	11.00		%	12.15		%	13.06		%	14.52		%	17.41		%
Other Data:
Book value per common share ⁽⁷⁾	$	11.11		$	10.95		$	10.64		$	10.53		$	10.30
Tangible book value per common share ⁽⁷⁾	$	10.69		$	10.59		$	10.31		$	10.18		$	9.97
Number of full service offices	147			151			156			151			140
Full time equivalent employees	1,761			1,928			1,931			1,829			1,734


(1)	The net interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted-average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted- average cost of interest-bearing liabilities for the period.


(2)	The net interest margin represents net interest income as a percent of average interest-earning assets for the period.


(3)	The efficiency ratio represents non-interest expense divided by the sum of net interest income and non-interest income.


(4)	The dividend payout ratio represents dividends paid per share divided by net income per share.


(5)	Non-performing loans include non-accrual loans and performing troubled debt restructured loans.


(6)	Ratios are for Investors Bank and do not include capital retained at the holding company level.


(7)	Excludes goodwill and intangible assets for the calculation of tangible book value and tangible equity. The common share calculation excludes treasury shares and unallocated ESOP shares.

Table of Contents



ITEM 7.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Since the Company’s initial public offering in 2005, we have transitioned from a wholesale thrift business to a retail commercial bank. This transition has been primarily accomplished by increasing the amount of our commercial loans and core deposits (savings, checking and money market accounts). Our transformation can be attributed to a number of factors, including organic growth, de novo branch openings, bank and branch acquisitions, as well as product expansion. We believe the attractive markets we operate in, namely, New Jersey and the greater New York metropolitan area, will continue to provide us with growth opportunities. In addition, we have national exposure through our Investors eAccess online deposit platform and our equipment finance, healthcare and leveraged lending portfolios. Our primary focus is to build and develop profitable customer relationships across all lines of business, both consumer and commercial.

Our results of operations depend primarily on net interest income, which is directly impacted by the interest rate environment. Net interest income is the difference between the interest income we earn on our interest-earning assets, primarily loans and investment securities, and the interest we pay on our interest-bearing liabilities, primarily interest-bearing transaction accounts, time deposits, and borrowed funds. Net interest income is affected by the level and direction of interest rates, the shape of the market yield curve, the timing of the placement and the repricing of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities on our balance sheet, and the rate of prepayments on our loans and mortgage-related assets.

A flat yield curve, caused primarily by rising short-term interest rates and lower long-term interest rates, combined with competitive pricing in both the loan and deposit markets, continues to create a challenging net interest margin environment. We continue to manage our interest rate risk against a backdrop of interest rate uncertainty. Should the yield curve steepen, we may experience an improvement in net interest income, particularly if short-term interest rates do not increase. If the yield curve stays flat, inverts or deposit competition increases, we may be subject to net interest margin compression.

Our results of operations are also significantly affected by general economic conditions. While the domestic consumer continues to generally benefit from improved housing and employment metrics, the velocity of economic growth, domestically and internationally, is challenged by global trade discord and pockets of socioeconomic and political unrest. In addition, our tax rate was negatively impacted by the State of New Jersey tax legislation enacted on July 1, 2018. In December 2019, the State of New Jersey provided clarification in regard to the previously enacted tax law changes and as a result, we expect that our state tax rate will be lower going forward.

Total assets increased $469.8 million, or 1.8%, to $26.70 billion at December 31, 2019 from $26.23 billion at December 31, 2018. Net loans increased $97.9 million, or 0.5%, to $21.48 billion at December 31, 2019 from $21.38 billion at December 31, 2018. Securities increased $167.2 million, or 4.5%, to $3.85 billion at December 31, 2019 from $3.68 billion at December 31, 2018. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we originated or funded $1.27 billion in commercial and industrial loans, $861.0 million in commercial real estate loans, $793.6 million in multi-family loans, $462.6 million in residential loans, $76.2 million in consumer and other loans and $69.8 million in construction loans. Our ongoing strategy is to continue to enhance our commercial banking capabilities and maintain a well-diversified loan portfolio. We have shifted focus to C&I originations while maintaining our commercial real estate and multi-family portfolio and continue to be diligent in our underwriting and credit risk monitoring of these portfolios. The overall level of non-performing loans remains low compared to our national and regional peers.

Capital management is a key component of our business strategy. We continue to manage our capital through a combination of organic growth, stock repurchases and cash dividends. Effective capital management and prudent growth allows us to effectively leverage the capital from the Company’s public offerings, while being mindful of tangible book value for stockholders. Our capital to total assets ratio has decreased to 9.82% at December 31, 2019 from 11.46% at December 31, 2018. Since the commencement of our first stock repurchase plan post second step stock offering, the Company has repurchased a total of 127.1 million shares at an average cost of $12.11 per share totaling $1.54 billion. Stockholders’ equity was impacted for the year ended December 31, 2019 by the repurchase of 39.4 million shares of common stock for $475.9 million as well as cash dividends of $0.44 per share totaling $122.2 million. In December 2019, we entered into a purchase and sale agreement with Blue Harbour, pursuant to which we repurchased from Blue Harbour the 27,318,628 shares of our common stock beneficially owned by Blue Harbour, at a purchase price of $12.29 per share, representing aggregate cost of approximately $335.7 million.

In addition to its branch network, the Bank offers online banking capabilities for consumers as well as small business, working to provide more robust treasury capabilities to its customers. During 2019, the company launched Investors eAccess, a secure online channel to attract deposits nationwide. Mobile and online banking services allow the Bank to serve our customers’ needs and adapt to a changing environment. In addition to our deposit-related digital capabilities, the Bank continues to enhance

Table of Contents

its digital capabilities related to originating and servicing loans. The Bank has partnered with ODX, a leading digital small business originations platform, to streamline its small business lending process. We continue to enhance our digital capabilities as a way to enhance the customer experience and deliver our services in a safe and secure manner. We will continue to execute our business strategies with a focus on prudent and opportunistic growth while striving to produce financial results that will create value for our stockholders. We intend to continue to grow our business by successfully attracting deposits, identifying favorable loan and investment opportunities, acquiring other banks and non-bank entities, enhancing our market presence and product offerings as well as continuing to invest in our people.

Critical Accounting Policies

We consider accounting policies that require management to exercise significant judgment or discretion or to make significant assumptions that have, or could have, a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets or on income to be critical accounting policies. As of December 31, 2019, we consider the following to be our critical accounting policies.

Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is the estimated amount considered necessary to cover credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. The allowance is established through the provision for loan losses that is charged against income. The methodology for determining the allowance for loan losses is considered a critical accounting policy by management because of the high degree of judgment involved, the subjectivity of the assumptions used, and the potential for changes in the economic environment that could result in changes to the amount of the recorded allowance for loan losses.

The allowance for loan losses has been determined in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, under which we are required to maintain an allowance for probable losses at the balance sheet date. We are responsible for the timely and periodic determination of the amount of the allowance required. We believe that our allowance for loan losses is adequate to cover specifically identifiable losses, as well as estimated losses inherent in our portfolio for which certain losses are probable but not specifically identifiable. Loans acquired are marked to fair value on the date of acquisition with no valuation allowance reflected in the allowance for loan losses. In conjunction with the quarterly evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, the Company performs an analysis on acquired loans to determine whether or not an allowance should be ascribed to those loans.

Management performs a quarterly evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. The analysis of the allowance for loan losses has two elements: loans collectively evaluated for impairment and loans individually evaluated for impairment. Specific allocations are made for loans determined to be impaired. A loan is deemed to be impaired if it is a commercial loan with an outstanding balance greater than $1.0 million and on non-accrual status, loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”), and other commercial loans greater than $1.0 million if management has specific information that it is probable it will not collect all amounts due under the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impairment is measured by determining the present value of expected future cash flows or, for collateral-dependent loans, the fair value of the collateral adjusted for market conditions and selling expenses.

The allowance for loans collectively evaluated for impairment consists of both quantitative and qualitative loss components. The Company determines the quantitative component by applying quantitative loss factors to the loans collectively evaluated for impairment segregated by type of loan, risk rating (if applicable) and payment history. In addition, the Company’s residential portfolio is subdivided between fixed and adjustable rate loans as adjustable rate loans are deemed to be subject to more credit risk if interest rates rise. Quantitative loss factors for each loan segment are generally determined based on the Company’s historical loss experience over a look-back period. Additionally, management assesses the loss emergence period for the expected losses of each loan segment and adjusts each quantitative loss factor accordingly. The loss emergence period is the estimated time from the date of a loss event (such as a personal bankruptcy) to the actual recognition of the loss (typically via the first full or partial loan charge-off), and is determined based upon a study of the Company’s past loss experience by loan segment. The quantitative loss factors may also be adjusted to account for qualitative factors, both internal and external to the Company, which are made to reflect risks inherent in the portfolio not captured by the quantitative component. This evaluation is based on among other things, loan and delinquency trends, general economic conditions, credit concentrations, industry trends and lending and credit management policies and procedures, but is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant revisions based upon changes in economic and real estate market conditions. Actual loan losses may be different than the allowance for loan losses we have established which could have a material negative effect on our financial results.

On a quarterly basis, management reviews the current status of various loan assets in order to evaluate the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. In this evaluation process, specific loans are analyzed to determine their potential risk of loss. Loans determined to be impaired are evaluated for potential loss exposure. Any shortfall results in a recommendation of a specific allowance or charge-off if the likelihood of loss is evaluated as probable. To determine the adequacy of collateral on a particular loan, an estimate of the fair value of the collateral is based on the most current appraised value available for real property or a

Table of Contents

discounted cash flow analysis on a business. The appraised value for real property is then reduced to reflect estimated liquidation expenses.

The allowance contains reserves identified as unallocated. These reserves reflect management’s attempt to provide for the imprecision and the uncertainty that is inherent in estimates of probable credit losses.

Our lending emphasis has been the origination of multi-family loans, commercial real estate loans, commercial and industrial loans, one- to four-family residential mortgage loans secured by one- to four-family residential real estate, construction loans, and consumer loans. The majority of consumer loans are cash surrender value lending on life insurance contracts, home equity loans and home equity lines of credit. These activities resulted in a concentration of loans secured by real estate property and businesses located in New Jersey and New York. Based on the composition of our loan portfolio, we believe the primary risks to our loan portfolio are increases in interest rates, a decline in the general economy, and declines in real estate market values in New Jersey, New York and surrounding states. Any one or combination of these events may adversely affect our loan portfolio resulting in increased delinquencies, loan losses and future levels of loan loss provisions. As a substantial amount of our loan portfolio is collateralized by real estate, appraisals of the underlying value of property securing loans are critical in determining the amount of the allowance required for specific impaired loans. Assumptions for appraisal valuations are instrumental in determining the value of properties. Negative changes to appraisal assumptions could significantly impact the valuation of a property securing a loan and the related allowance determined. The assumptions supporting such appraisals are carefully reviewed to determine that the resulting values reasonably reflect amounts realizable on the related loans.

The Company obtains an appraisal for all commercial loans that are collateral dependent upon origination. Updated appraisals are generally obtained for substandard loans $1.0 million or greater and special mention loans with a balance of $2.0 million or greater in the process of collection by the Company’s special assets department. This is done in order to determine the specific reserve or charge off needed. As part of the allowance for loan losses process, the Company reviews each collateral dependent commercial loan classified as non-accrual and/or impaired and assesses whether there has been an adverse change in the collateral value supporting the loan. The Company utilizes information from its commercial lending officers and its credit department and special assets department’s knowledge of changes in real estate conditions in our lending area to identify if possible deterioration of collateral value has occurred. Based on the severity of the changes in market conditions, management determines if an updated appraisal is warranted or if downward adjustments to the previous appraisal are warranted. If it is determined that the deterioration of the collateral value is significant enough to warrant ordering a new appraisal, an estimate of the downward adjustments to the existing appraised value is used in assessing if additional specific reserves are necessary until the updated appraisal is received.

For homogeneous residential mortgage loans, the Company’s policy is to obtain an appraisal upon the origination of the loan and an updated appraisal in the event a loan becomes 90 days delinquent. Thereafter, the appraisal is updated every two years if the loan remains in non-performing status and the foreclosure process has not been completed. Management adjusts the appraised value of residential loans to reflect estimated selling costs and declines in the real estate market.

Management believes the potential risk for outdated appraisals for impaired and other non-performing loans has been mitigated due to the fact that the loans are individually assessed to determine that the loan’s carrying value is not in excess of the fair value of the collateral. Loans are generally charged off after an analysis is completed which indicates that collectability of the full principal balance is in doubt.

Although we believe we have established and maintained the allowance for loan losses at adequate levels, additions may be necessary based on the growth and composition of the loan portfolio, the level of loan delinquency and the economic conditions in our lending area. Management uses relevant information available; however, the level of the allowance for loan losses remains an estimate that is subject to significant judgment and short-term change. In addition, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance, as an integral part of their examination process, will periodically review our allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require us to recognize adjustments to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination.

Derivative Financial Instruments. As required by ASC 815, the Company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether the Company has elected to designate a derivative in a hedging relationship and apply hedge accounting and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges. Hedge accounting generally provides for the matching of the timing of gain or loss recognition on the hedging instrument with the recognition of the changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk in a fair value hedge or the earnings effect of the hedged forecasted transactions in a cash flow hedge. The Company may enter into derivative contracts that are intended

Table of Contents

to economically hedge certain of its risks, even though hedge accounting does not apply or the Company elects not to apply hedge accounting.

Comparison of Financial Condition at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018

Total Assets. Total assets increased by $469.8 million, or 1.8%, to $26.70 billion at December 31, 2019 from $26.23 billion at December 31, 2018. Net loans increased by $97.9 million, or 0.5%, to $21.48 billion at December 31, 2019. Securities increased by $167.2 million, or 4.5%, to $3.85 billion at December 31, 2019 from $3.68 billion at December 31, 2018.

Net Loans. Net loans increased by $97.9 million, or 0.5%, to $21.48 billion at December 31, 2019 from $21.38 billion at December 31, 2018. The detail of the loan portfolio (including PCI loans) is below:



	December 31, 2019			December 31, 2018
	(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial Loans:
Multi-family loans	$	7,813,236		8,165,187
Commercial real estate loans	4,831,347			4,786,825
Commercial and industrial loans	2,951,306			2,389,756
Construction loans	262,866			227,015
Total commercial loans	15,858,755			15,568,783
Residential mortgage loans	5,144,718			5,351,115
Consumer and other	699,796			707,866
Total Loans	21,703,269			21,627,764
Deferred fees, premiums and other, net	907			(13,811		)
Allowance for loan losses	(228,120		)	(235,817		)
Net loans	$	21,476,056		$	21,378,136

During the year ended December 31, 2019, we originated or funded $1.27 billion in commercial and industrial loans, $861.0 million in commercial real estate loans, $793.6 million in multi-family loans, $462.6 million in residential loans, $76.2 million in consumer and other loans and $69.8 million in construction loans. The growth in the loan portfolio reflects our continued focus on growing and diversifying our loan portfolio. A significant portion of our commercial loan portfolio, including commercial and industrial loans, are secured by commercial real estate and are primarily on properties and businesses located in New Jersey and New York. In addition to the loans originated for our portfolio, we originated residential mortgage loans for sale to third parties totaling $269.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. We also purchased mortgage loans from correspondent entities including other banks and mortgage bankers. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we purchased loans totaling $294.1 million from these entities but no longer purchase such loans.

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth non-accrual loans (excluding PCI loans and loans held-for-sale) on the dates indicated as well as certain asset quality ratios:



	December 31, 2019				September 30, 2019				June 30, 2019				March 31, 2019				December 31, 2018
	# of Loans	Amount			# of Loans	Amount			# of Loans	Amount			# of Loans	Amount			# of Loans	Amount
	(Dollars in millions)
Multi-family	8	$	23.3		6	$	19.6		14	$	34.1		14	$	34.1		15	$	33.9
Commercial real estate	22	12.0			30	12.3			27	8.1			32	9.8			35	12.4
Commercial and industrial	18	12.5			16	12.0			13	18.0			14	17.2			14	19.4
Construction	—	—			—	—			1	0.2			1	0.2			1	0.2
Total commercial loans	48	47.8			52	43.9			55	60.4			61	61.3			65	65.9
Residential and consumer	255	47.4			261	48.2			275	51.2			296	56.4			320	59.0
Total non-accrual loans	303	$	95.2		313	$	92.1		330	$	111.6		357	$	117.7		385	$	124.9
Accruing troubled debt restructured loans	57	$	13.1		58	$	12.5		56	$	12.2		54	$	13.6		54	$	13.6
Non-accrual loans to total loans		0.44		%		0.42		%		0.51		%		0.54		%		0.58		%
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of non-accrual loans		239.66		%		247.62		%		207.83		%		199.44		%		188.78		%
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of total loans		1.05		%		1.05		%		1.05		%		1.08		%		1.09		%

Total non-accrual loans decreased to $95.2 million at December 31, 2019 compared to $124.9 million at December 31, 2018. At December 31, 2019, there were $3.9 million of commercial real estate loans and $3.8 million of commercial and industrial loans that were classified as non-accrual which were performing in accordance with their contractual terms. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we sold $173,000 of non-performing commercial real estate loans. There were no sales of non-performing loans during the year ended December 31, 2018. Criticized and classified loans as a percent of total loans decreased to 5.36% at December 31, 2019 from 5.72% at December 31, 2018. In assessing and classifying our commercial loan portfolio, the Company places significant emphasis on the borrower’s ability to service its debt. At December 31, 2019, our allowance for loan losses as a percent of total loans was 1.05%. At December 31, 2019, there were $36.6 million of loans deemed as TDRs, of which $27.0 million were residential and consumer loans, $7.2 million were commercial and industrial loans and $2.4 million were commercial real estate loans. TDRs of $13.1 million were classified as accruing and $23.5 million were classified as non-accrual at December 31, 2019. We continue to proactively and diligently work to resolve our troubled loans.

In addition to non-accrual loans, we continue to monitor our portfolio for potential problem loans. Potential problem loans are defined as loans about which we have concerns as to the ability of the borrower to comply with the current loan repayment terms and which may cause the loan to be placed on non-accrual status. As of December 31, 2019, the Company has deemed potential problem loans totaling $68.1 million, which is comprised of 6 multi-family loans totaling $47.6 million, 24 commercial and industrial loans totaling $13.7 million and 9 commercial real estate loans totaling $6.8 million. Management is actively monitoring all of these loans.

The allowance for loan losses decreased by $7.7 million to $228.1 million at December 31, 2019 from $235.8 million at December 31, 2018. Our allowance for loan losses was positively impacted by improved credit quality, including the level of non-accrual loans and charge-offs/recoveries, and modest loan growth. Future increases in the allowance for loan losses may be necessary based on the growth and composition of the loan portfolio, the level of loan delinquency and the economic conditions in our lending area. At December 31, 2019, our allowance for loan losses as a percent of total loans was 1.05%.

Securities. Securities are held primarily for liquidity, interest rate risk management and yield enhancement. Our Investment Policy requires that investment transactions conform to Federal and State investment regulations. Our investments purchased

Table of Contents

may include, but are not limited to, U.S. Treasury obligations, securities issued by various Federal Agencies, State and Municipal subdivisions, mortgage-backed securities, certain certificates of deposit of insured financial institutions, overnight and short-term loans to other banks, investment grade corporate debt instruments, and mutual funds. In addition, the Company may invest in equity securities subject to certain limitations. Purchase decisions are based upon a thorough analysis of each security to determine if it conforms to our overall asset/liability management objectives. The analysis must consider its effect on our risk-based capital measurement, prospects for yield and/or appreciation and other risk factors. Debt securities are classified as held-to-maturity or available-for-sale when purchased.

At December 31, 2019, our securities portfolio represented 14.4% of our total assets. Securities, in the aggregate, increased by $167.2 million, or 4.5%, to $3.85 billion at December 31, 2019 from $3.68 billion at December 31, 2018. This increase was a result of purchases, partially offset by sales and paydowns.

Stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank, Bank Owned Life Insurance and Other Assets. The amount of stock we own in the FHLB increased by $7.0 million, or 2.7% to $267.2 million at December 31, 2019 from $260.2 million at December 31, 2018. The amount of stock we own in the FHLB is primarily related to the balance of our outstanding borrowings from the FHLB. Bank owned life insurance was $218.5 million at December 31, 2019 and $211.9 million at December 31, 2018. Other assets were $82.3 million at December 31, 2019 and $29.3 million at December 31, 2018.

Deposits. At December 31, 2019, deposits totaled $17.86 billion, representing 74.2% of our total liabilities. Our deposit strategy is focused on attracting core deposits (savings, checking and money market accounts), resulting in a deposit mix of lower cost core products. We remain committed to our plan of attracting more core deposits because core deposits represent a more stable source of low cost funds and may be less sensitive to changes in market interest rates.

Deposits increased by $280.1 million, or 1.6%, from $17.58 billion at December 31, 2018 to $17.86 billion at December 31, 2019. Total checking accounts increased $665.8 million to $7.99 billion at December 31, 2019 from $7.32 billion at December 31, 2018. At December 31, 2019, we held $13.85 billion in core deposits, representing 77.6% of total deposits, of which $266.4 million are brokered money market deposits. At December 31, 2019, $4.01 billion, or 22.4%, of our total deposit balances were certificates of deposit, of which included $1.31 billion of brokered certificates of deposit. At December 31, 2019, $4.89 billion, or 27.4%, of our total deposits consisted of public fund deposits from local government entities, predominately domiciled in the state of New Jersey. Core deposits are an attractive funding alternative because they are generally a more stable source of low cost funding and are less sensitive to changes in market interest rates.

Borrowed Funds. Borrowings are primarily with the FHLB which are collateralized by our residential and commercial mortgage portfolios. Borrowed funds increased by $391.4 million, or 7.2%, to $5.83 billion at December 31, 2019 from $5.44 billion at December 31, 2018 to help fund the growth of the security and loan portfolios and our share repurchases. In June 2019, we prepaid $200.0 million of FHLB advances and a $150.0 million repurchase agreement with a total average interest rate of 3.00% and maturity dates in 2020 and 2021. The prepaid borrowings were replaced with $200.0 million of FHLB advances and a $150.0 million repurchase agreement with a total average interest rate of 2.55% and maturity dates averaging 4 years. Included in the interest rate is a prepayment penalty of 0.47%. In August 2019, we prepaid $275.0 million of FHLB advances with a total average interest rate of 2.46% and maturity dates in 2021. The prepaid borrowings were replaced with $275.0 million of FHLB advances with a total average interest rate of 2.16% and maturity dates of 5 years. Included in the interest rate is a prepayment penalty of 0.27%. The prepayment penalties are amortized over the life of the new debt instruments in accordance with ASC 470-50, Debt - Modifications and Extinguishments.

Stockholders’ Equity. Stockholders’ equity decreased by $383.4 million to $2.62 billion at December 31, 2019 from $3.01 billion at December 31, 2018. The decrease was primarily attributed to the repurchase of 39.4 million shares of common stock for $475.9 million and cash dividends of $0.44 per share totaling $122.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. As previously noted, in December 2019, we repurchased 27,318,628 shares beneficially owned by Blue Harbour for approximately $335.7 million. These decreases were partially offset by net income of $195.5 million and share-based plan activity of $26.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2019.

Analysis of Net Interest Income

Net interest income represents the difference between income we earn on our interest-earning assets and the expense we pay on interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income depends on the volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the interest rates earned on such assets and paid on such liabilities.

Table of Contents

Average Balances and Yields. The following tables set forth average balance sheets, average yields and costs, and certain other information for the periods indicated. No tax-equivalent yield adjustments were made, as the effect thereof was not material. All average balances are daily average balances. Non-accrual loans were included in the computation of average balances, however interest receivable on these loans have been fully reserved for and not included in interest income. The yields set forth below include the effect of deferred fees, discounts and premiums that are amortized or accreted to interest income or expense.

Table of Contents



	For the Year Ended December 31,
	2019						2018						2017
	Average Outstanding Balance		Interest Earned/ Paid		Average Yield/ Rate		Average Outstanding Balance		Interest Earned/ Paid		Average Yield/ Rate		Average Outstanding Balance		Interest Earned/ Paid		Average Yield/ Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Interest-bearing deposits	$	215,447	$	2,805	1.30	%	$	212,980	$	2,435	1.14	%	272,382		$	2,164	0.79	%
Equity securities	5,938		143		2.41		5,754		134		2.33		5,699		139		2.44
Debt securities available-for-sale	2,395,047		67,822		2.83		2,042,129		46,057		2.26		1,844,887		37,152		2.01
Debt securities held-to-maturity	1,317,322		40,017		3.04		1,668,106		48,989		2.94		1,704,333		44,923		2.64
Net loans	21,576,829		912,091		4.23		20,498,857		854,595		4.17		19,414,842		783,938		4.04
Stock in FHLB	274,661		17,341		6.31		247,513		16,206		6.55		243,409		13,367		5.49
Total interest-earning assets	25,785,244		1,040,219		4.03		24,675,339		968,416		3.92		23,485,552		881,683		3.75
Non-interest-earning assets	975,585						707,370						758,134
Total assets	$	26,760,829					$	25,382,709					$	24,243,686
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Savings deposits	$	1,985,142	$	17,148	0.86	%	$	2,170,510	$	13,240	0.61	%	$	2,107,363	$	8,395	0.40	%
Interest-bearing checking	5,020,991		84,698		1.69		4,651,313		62,447		1.34		4,383,110		37,091		0.85
Money market accounts	3,703,413		60,896		1.64		3,837,174		46,394		1.21		4,240,775		34,366		0.81
Certificates of deposit	4,609,274		99,115		2.15		4,149,438		66,564		1.60		3,202,312		33,691		1.05
Total interest-bearing deposits	15,318,820		261,857		1.71		14,808,435		188,645		1.27		13,933,560		113,543		0.81
Borrowed funds	5,611,206		123,289		2.20		4,898,867		99,754		2.04		4,675,626		88,364		1.89
Total interest-bearing liabilities	20,930,026		385,146		1.84		19,707,302		288,399		1.46		18,609,186		201,907		1.08
Non-interest-bearing liabilities	2,887,601						2,590,675						2,468,005
Total liabilities	23,817,627						22,297,977						21,077,191
Stockholders’ equity	2,943,202						3,084,732						3,166,495
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	26,760,829					$	25,382,709					$	24,243,686
Net interest income			$	655,073					$	680,017					$	679,776
Net interest rate spread ⁽¹⁾					2.19	%					2.46	%					2.67	%
Net interest-earning assets ⁽²⁾	$	4,855,218					$	4,968,037					$	4,876,366
Net interest margin ⁽³⁾					2.54	%					2.76	%					2.89	%
Ratio of interest-earning assets to total interest-bearing liabilities	1.23						1.25						1.26


(1)	Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the yield on average interest-earning assets and the cost of average interest-bearing liabilities.


(2)	Net interest-earning assets represent total interest-earning assets less total interest-bearing liabilities.


(3)	Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by average total interest-earning assets.

Table of Contents

Rate/Volume Analysis

The following table presents the effects of changing rates and volumes on our net interest income for the periods indicated. The rate column shows the effects attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume). The volume column shows the effects attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate). The net column represents the sum of the prior columns. For purposes of this table, changes attributable to both rate and volume, which cannot be segregated, have been allocated proportionately, based on the changes due to rate and the changes due to volume.



	Years Ended December 31, 2019 vs. 2018							Years Ended December 31, 2018 vs. 2017
	Increase (Decrease) Due to					Net Increase (Decrease)		Increase (Decrease) Due to					Net Increase (Decrease)
	Volume			Rate		Net Increase (Decrease)		Volume			Rate		Net Increase (Decrease)
	(In thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Interest-earning cash accounts	$	28		342		370		$	(471	)	742		271
Equities	4			5		9		1			(6	)	(5	)
Debt securities available-for-sale	8,027			13,738		21,765		3,892			5,013		8,905
Debt securities held-to-maturity	(5,724		)	(3,248	)	(8,972	)	(28		)	4,094		4,066
Net loans	46,098			11,398		57,496		44,129			26,528		70,657
Federal Home Loan Bank stock	1,790			(655	)	1,135		225			2,614		2,839
Total interest-earning assets	50,223			21,580		71,803		47,748			38,985		86,733
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Savings	(1,117		)	5,025		3,908		254			4,591		4,845
Interest-bearing checking	4,893			17,358		22,251		2,306			23,050		25,356
Money market accounts	(1,600		)	16,102		14,502		(3,278		)	15,306		12,028
Certificates of deposit	7,322			25,229		32,551		9,977			22,896		32,873
Total deposits	9,498			63,714		73,212		9,259			65,843		75,102
Borrowed funds	15,450			8,085		23,535		4,257			7,133		11,390
Total interest-bearing liabilities	24,948			71,799		96,747		13,516			72,976		86,492
(Decrease) increase in net interest income	$	25,275		(50,219	)	(24,944	)	$	34,232		(33,991	)	241

Comparison of Operating Results for the Year Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

Net Income. Net income for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $195.5 million compared to net income of $202.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. Included for the year ended December 31, 2019 is $7.8 million of additional income tax expense resulting from the revaluation of our net deferred tax asset as the State of New Jersey provided clarification in December 2019 relating to previously enacted tax law changes. Included in net income for the year ended December 31, 2018 was a $32.8 million loss on the sale of debt securities available-for-sale.

Net Interest Income. Net interest income decreased by $24.9 million to $655.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 from $680.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The net interest margin decreased 22 basis points to 2.54% for the year ended December 31, 2019 from 2.76% for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Interest and Dividend Income. Total interest and dividend income increased by $71.8 million, or 7.4%, to $1.04 billion for the year ended December 31, 2019. Interest income on loans increased by $57.5 million, or 6.7%, to $912.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, as a result of a $1.08 billion, or 5.3%, increase in the average balance of net loans to $21.58 billion for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily attributed to loan originations, offset by paydowns and payoffs. In addition, the weighted average yield on net loans increased 6 basis points to 4.23%. Prepayment penalties, which are included in interest income, totaled $16.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to $20.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. Interest income on all other interest-earning assets, excluding loans, increased by $14.3 million, or 12.6%, to $128.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 which is attributable to an increase of 31 basis points to 3.04% in the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets, excluding loans. In addition, the average balance of all other interest earning assets, excluding loans, increased $31.9 million to $4.21 billion for the year ended December 31, 2019.

Table of Contents

Interest Expense. Total interest expense increased by $96.7 million, or 33.5%, to $385.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. Interest expense on interest-bearing deposits increased $73.2 million, or 38.8%, to $261.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. The weighted average cost of interest-bearing deposits increased 44 basis points to 1.71% for the year ended December 31, 2019. In addition, the average balance of total interest-bearing deposits increased $510.4 million, or 3.5%, to $15.32 billion for the year ended December 31, 2019. Interest expense on borrowed funds increased by $23.5 million, or 23.6%, to $123.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. The weighted average cost of borrowings increased 16 basis points to 2.20% for the year ended December 31, 2019. In addition, the average balance of borrowed funds increased $712.3 million, or 14.5%, to $5.61 billion for the year ended December 31, 2019.

Non-Interest Income. Total non-interest income increased by $43.3 million to $53.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. The increase was primarily due to an increase of $26.1 million in non-interest income on securities predominately resulting from a $5.7 million loss on the sale of securities during 2019 as compared to a $32.8 million loss on the sale of securities during 2018. In addition, other income increased $11.8 million primarily attributed to customer swap fee income, gains on our equipment finance portfolio, non-depository investment products and a sale-leaseback transaction.

Non-Interest Expense. Total non-interest expenses were $422.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, an increase of $15.1 million, or 3.7%, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. This increase was due to an increase of $7.9 million in compensation and fringe benefit expense, an increase of $4.8 million in other non-interest expense, an increase of $4.2 million in data processing and communication expense, and an increase of $2.0 million in professional fees for the year ended December 31, 2019. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $4.6 million in federal insurance premiums.

Income Taxes. Income tax expense was $91.2 million and $67.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. The effective tax rate was 31.8% for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 25.1% for the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase in the tax rate primarily resulted from the State of New Jersey providing clarification on mandatory combined reporting, causing a remeasurement of the Company’s deferred tax balances.

Comparison of Operating Results for the Year Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

Refer to “Item 7. - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 for a discussion of 2018 results as compared to 2017 results.

Management of Market Risk

Qualitative Analysis. One significant form of market risk is interest rate risk. Interest rate risk results from timing differences in the cash flow or re-pricing of our assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet contracts (i.e., loan commitments); the effect of loan prepayments, deposit activity; potential differences in the behavior of lending and funding rates arising from the use of different indices; and “yield curve risk” arising from changes in the term structure of interest rates. Changes in market interest rates can affect net interest income by influencing the amount and rate of new loan originations, the ability of borrowers to repay variable rate loans, the volume of loan prepayments and the mix and flow of deposits.

The general objective of our interest rate risk management process is to determine the appropriate level of risk given our business model and then to manage that risk in a manner consistent with that risk appetite. Our Asset Liability Committee, which consists of senior management and executives, evaluates the interest rate risk inherent in our balance sheet, the operating environment and capital and liquidity requirements and may modify our lending, investing and deposit gathering strategies accordingly. On a quarterly basis, our Board of Directors reviews various Asset Liability Committee reports that estimate the sensitivity of the economic value of equity and net interest income under various interest rate scenarios.

Our tactics and strategies may include the use of various financial instruments, including derivatives, to manage our exposure to interest rate risk. Certain derivatives are designated as hedging instruments in a qualifying hedge accounting relationship (fair value or cash flow hedge). Hedged items can be either assets or liabilities. As of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company had cash flow and fair value hedges with aggregate notional amounts of $2.68 billion and $2.61 billion, respectively. Included in the fair value hedges are $475.0 million in asset swap transactions where fixed rate loan payments are exchanged for variable rate payments. These transactions were executed in an effort to reduce the Company’s exposure to rising rates. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company terminated three interest rate swaps with an aggregate notional amount of $1.00 billion which had been included in asset swap transactions.

We actively evaluate interest rate risk in connection with our lending, investing and deposit activities and our off-balance sheet positions. At December 31, 2019, 23.7% of our total loan portfolio was comprised of residential mortgages, of which approximately 28.5% was in variable rate products, while 71.5% was in fixed rate products. Our variable rate and short term fixed rate mortgage related assets have helped to reduce our exposure to interest rate fluctuations. Long term fixed-rate products may adversely impact our net interest income in a rising rate environment. The origination of commercial loans, particularly commercial

Table of Contents

and industrial loans, commercial real estate loans and multi-family loans, which have outpaced the growth in the residential portfolio in recent years, generally help reduce our interest rate risk due to their shorter term compared to fixed rate residential mortgage loans. In addition, we primarily invest in securities which display relatively conservative interest rate risk characteristics.

We use an internally managed and implemented industry standard asset/liability model to complete our quarterly interest rate risk reports. The model projects net interest income based on various interest rate scenarios and horizons. We use a combination of analyses to monitor our exposure to changes in interest rates.

Our net interest income sensitivity analysis determines the relative balance between the repricing of assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet positions over various horizons. This asset and liability analysis includes expected cash flows from loans and securities, using forecasted prepayment rates, reinvestment rates, as well as contractual and forecasted liability cash flows. This analysis identifies mismatches in the timing of asset and liability cash flows but does not necessarily provide an accurate indicator of interest rate risk because the rate forecasts and assumptions used in the analysis may not reflect actual experience. The economic value of equity (“EVE”) analysis estimates the change in the net present value (“NPV”) of assets and liabilities and off-balance sheet contracts over a range of immediate rate shock interest rate scenarios. In calculating changes in EVE, for the various scenarios we forecast loan and securities prepayment rates, reinvestment rates and deposit decay rates.

In July 2017, the Financial Conduct Authority (the authority that regulates LIBOR) announced it intends to stop compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021. The Alternative Reference Rates Committee (“ARRC”) has proposed that the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) is the rate that represents best practice as the alternative to USD-LIBOR for use in derivatives and other financial contracts that are currently indexed to USD-LIBOR. The ARRC has proposed a paced market transition plan to SOFR from USD-LIBOR and organizations are currently working on industry wide and company specific transition plans as it relates to derivatives and cash markets exposed to USD-LIBOR. The Company has approximately $5.00 billion in financial instruments which are indexed to USD-LIBOR for which it is monitoring the activity and evaluating the related risks.

Quantitative Analysis. The table below sets forth, as of December 31, 2019, the estimated changes in our EVE and our net interest income that would result from the designated changes in interest rates. Such changes to interest rates are calculated as an immediate and permanent change for the purposes of computing EVE and a gradual change over a one-year period for the purposes of computing net interest income. Computations of prospective effects of hypothetical interest rate changes are based on numerous assumptions including relative levels of market interest rates, loan prepayments and deposit decay, and should not be relied upon as indicative of actual results. The following table reflects management’s expectations of the changes in EVE and net interest income for an interest rate decrease of 100 basis points and increase of 200 basis points.



	EVE ^{(1) (2)}							Net Interest Income ⁽³⁾
Change in Interest Rates (basis points)	Estimated EVE		Estimated Increase (Decrease)					Estimated Net Interest Income		Estimated Increase (Decrease)
Change in Interest Rates (basis points)	Estimated EVE		Amount			Percent		Estimated Net Interest Income		Amount		Percent
	(Dollars in thousands)
+ 200bp	$	3,300,884		(400,120	)	(10.8	)%	$	639,962	(34,198	)	(5.1	)%
0bp	$	3,701,004		—		—		$	674,160	—		—
-100bp	$	3,915,477		214,473		5.8	%	$	690,721	16,561		2.5	%


(1)	Assumes an instantaneous and parallel shift in interest rates at all maturities.


(2)	EVE is the discounted present value of expected cash flows from assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet contracts.


(3)	Assumes a gradual change in interest rates over a one year period at all maturities.

The table above indicates that at December 31, 2019, in the event of a 200 basis point increase in interest rates, we would be expected to experience a 10.8% decrease in EVE and a $34.2 million, or 5.1%, decrease in net interest income. In the event of a 100 basis point decrease in interest rates, we would be expected to experience a 5.8% increase in EVE and a $16.6 million, or 2.5%, increase in net interest income. This data does not reflect any future actions we may take in response to changes in interest rates, such as changing the mix in or growth of our assets and liabilities, which could change the results of the EVE and net interest income calculations.

As mentioned above, we use an internally developed asset liability model to compute our quarterly interest rate risk reports. Certain shortcomings are inherent in any methodology used in the above interest rate risk measurements. Modeling EVE and net interest income sensitivity requires certain assumptions that may or may not reflect the manner in which actual yields and costs respond to changes in market interest rates. The EVE and net interest income table presented above assumes no balance sheet growth and that generally the composition of our interest-rate sensitive assets and liabilities existing at the beginning of the analysis remains constant over the period being measured and, accordingly, the data does not reflect any actions we may take in

Table of Contents

response to changes in interest rates. The table also assumes a particular change in interest rates is reflected uniformly across the yield curve. Accordingly, although the EVE and net interest income table provide an indication of our sensitivity to interest rate changes at a particular point in time, such measurement is not intended to and does not provide a precise forecast of the effects of changes in market interest rates on our EVE and net interest income.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity is the ability to economically meet current and future financial obligations. The Company’s primary sources of funds are deposits, principal and interest payments on loans and mortgage-backed securities, FHLB and other borrowings and, to a lesser extent, proceeds from the sale of loans and investment maturities. While scheduled amortization of loans is a predictable source of funds, deposit flows and mortgage prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition. Our Asset Liability Committee is responsible for establishing and monitoring our liquidity targets and strategies to ensure that sufficient liquidity exists for meeting the needs of our customers as well as unanticipated contingencies. The Company has other sources of liquidity, including unsecured overnight lines of credit, brokered deposits and other borrowings from correspondent banks.

A primary source of funds is cash provided by cash flows on loans and securities. Principal repayments on loans for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 were $3.66 billion, $3.47 billion and $2.81 billion, respectively. Principal repayments on securities for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 were $744.0 million, $685.5 million and $660.3 million, respectively. There were sales of securities during years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 of $399.4 million, $632.4 million and $102.1 million, respectively. There were no unusual payoffs or paydowns of TruPs for the year ended December 31, 2019. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company received proceeds of $7.3 million from the payoff and paydown of TruPs which resulted in $3.2 million of interest income from securities, as well as a gain of $1.2 million recognized as non-interest income. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company received proceeds of $3.1 million from the liquidation of one TruP security. As a result, $1.9 million was recognized as interest income from securities.

In addition to cash provided by principal and interest payments on loans and securities, our other sources of funds include cash provided by operating activities, deposits and borrowings. Net cash provided by operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 totaled $160.7 million, $275.6 million and $302.4 million, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 deposits increased $280.1 million, $222.6 million and $2.08 billion, respectively. Deposit flows are affected by the overall level of and direction of changes in market interest rates, the pricing of products offered by us and our local competitors, and other factors.

For the year ended December 31, 2019, net borrowed funds increased $391.4 million to help fund the growth of the security and loan portfolios and our share repurchases. For the year ended December 31, 2018, net borrowed funds increased $974.1 million. For the year ended December 31, 2017 net borrowed funds decreased $84.7 million.

Our primary use of funds is for the origination and purchase of loans and the purchase of securities. During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, we originated loans of $3.53 billion, $4.15 billion and $3.60 billion, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2019 we purchased loans of $427.1 million. During the year ended December 31, 2018, excluding loans and leases acquired in the acquisition of the equipment finance portfolio, we purchased loans of $514.0 million. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we purchased loans of $540.9 million. During the year ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 we purchased securities of $1.27 billion, $1.24 billion and $1.15 billion, respectively. In addition, we utilized $475.9 million, $258.2 million and $59.1 million during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, to repurchase shares of our common stock. Included in the shares repurchased during the year ended December 31, 2019 is the Blue Harbour transaction.

At December 31, 2019, we had commitments to originate commercial loans of $407.3 million. Additionally, we had commitments to originate residential loans of approximately $36.5 million. While we purchased residential loans from correspondent banks during 2019, we no longer purchase such loans and have no purchase commitments as of December 31, 2019. Unused home equity lines of credit and undisbursed business and constructions loans totaled approximately $1.62 billion at December 31, 2019. Certificates of deposit due within one year of December 31, 2019 totaled $3.63 billion, or 20.3% of total deposits. If these deposits do not remain with us, we will be required to seek other sources of funds, including but not limited to other retail and commercial deposits and wholesale funding. Depending on market conditions, we may be required to pay higher rates on such deposits or other borrowings than we currently pay.

Liquidity management is both a short and long-term function of business management. Our most liquid assets are cash and cash equivalents. The levels of these assets depend upon our operating, financing, lending and investing activities during any given period. At December 31, 2019, cash and cash equivalents totaled $174.9 million. Securities, which provide an additional source of liquidity, totaled $3.85 billion at December 31, 2019, of which $920.5 million are pledged to secure borrowings and

Table of Contents

municipal deposits. If we require funds beyond our ability to generate them internally, we have wholesale funding alternatives, which provide an additional source of funds. At December 31, 2019, our borrowing capacity at the FHLB was $12.45 billion, of which we had outstanding borrowings of $9.01 billion, which included letters of credit totaling $4.02 billion. In addition, the Bank had unsecured overnight borrowings (Fed Funds) with other financial institutions totaling $750.0 million, of which $400.0 million was outstanding at December 31, 2019.

Investors Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements, including a risk-based capital measure. The risk-based capital guidelines include both a definition of capital and a framework for calculating risk-weighted assets by assigning balance sheet assets and off-balance sheet items to broad risk categories. At December 31, 2019, Investors Bank exceeded all regulatory capital requirements. Investors Bank is considered “well capitalized” under regulatory guidelines. See “Item 1. Supervision and Regulation — Federal Banking Regulation — Capital Requirements.”

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual Obligations

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. As a financial services provider, we routinely are a party to various financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risks, such as commitments to extend credit and unused lines of credit. While these contractual obligations represent our potential future cash requirements, a significant portion of our commitments to extend credit may expire without being drawn upon. Such commitments are subject to the same credit policies and approval processes that we use for loans that we originate.

Contractual Obligations. In the ordinary course of our operations, we enter into certain contractual obligations. Such obligations include operating leases for premises and equipment.

The following table summarizes our significant fixed and determinable contractual obligations and other funding needs by payment date at December 31, 2019. The payment amounts represent those amounts due to the recipient and do not include any unamortized premiums or discounts or other similar carrying amount adjustments.



	Payments Due by Period
Contractual Obligations	Less than One Year		One to Three Years	Three to Five Years	More than Five Years	Total
	(In thousands)
Other borrowed funds	$	1,436,000	1,724,958	1,918,243	300,000	5,379,201
Repurchase agreements	100,000		—	347,910	—	447,910
Operating leases	24,013		67,384	59,503	62,322	213,222
Total	$	1,560,013	1,792,342	2,325,656	362,322	6,040,333

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company invested in a low income housing tax credit program that qualifies for community reinvestment tax credits. These commitments are payable on demand and are recorded in other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Total commitments entered into in 2019 equal $10.0 million, of which the remaining commitment outstanding equals $9.2 million as of December 31, 2019.

The Company has entered into derivative financial instruments to manage exposures that arise from business activities that result in the receipt or payment of future known and uncertain cash amounts, the value of which are determined by interest rates. The Company’s derivative financial instruments are used to manage differences in the amount, timing, and duration of the Company’s known or expected cash receipts and its known or expected cash payments principally related to the Company’s borrowings and loans. During the year ended December 31, 2019, such derivatives were used (i) to hedge the variability in cash flows associated with borrowings and (ii) to hedge changes in the fair value of certain pools of prepayable fixed- and adjustable-rate assets. These derivatives had an aggregate notional amount of $2.68 billion as of December 31, 2019. The fair value of derivatives designated as hedging activities as of December 31, 2019 was an asset of $559,000, inclusive of accrued interest and variation margin posted in accordance with the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. The Company has also entered into derivatives not designated as hedging activities resulting from participations in interest rate swaps provided to external lenders as part of loan participation arrangements and interest rate risk management services to commercial customers utilizing interest rate swaps. The fair value of the derivatives resulting from participations in interest rate swaps provided to lenders was a liability of $125,000 and the fair value of the derivatives resulting from customer interest rate risk management services was an asset of $5.4 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2019. Interest rate swaps with customers under interest rate risk management services are offset by interest rate swaps that the Company executes with a third party, which minimizes the Company’s net risk in these transactions.

Table of Contents

Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices

The consolidated financial statements and related notes of Investors Bancorp, Inc. have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). GAAP generally requires the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars without considering changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. The impact of inflation is reflected in the increased cost of our operations. Unlike industrial companies, our assets and liabilities are primarily monetary in nature. As a result, changes in market interest rates have a greater impact on performance than the effects of inflation.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 22 in the notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 15 - Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules” for a description of recent accounting pronouncements already adopted.

New Accounting Pronouncements Issued But Not Yet Adopted

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments- Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (“CECL”), further amended by ASU 2019-04, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial Instruments. Topic 326 pertains to the measurement of credit losses on financial instruments. This update requires the measurement of all expected credit losses for financial instruments held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Financial institutions and other organizations will now use forward-looking information to better inform their credit loss estimates. This update is intended to improve financial reporting by requiring timelier recording of credit losses on loans and other financial instruments held by financial institutions and other organizations. This update will be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2019.

Subsequent to year-end, the Company adopted the above mentioned ASUs related to Financial Instruments -Credit Losses (Topic 326) as of January 1, 2020, using a modified retrospective approach. Our implementation process included scoping, segmentation and the design of a methodology appropriate for each respective financial instrument. The process also included the development of loss forecasting models as well as the incorporation of qualitative adjustments. Evaluation of technical accounting topics, updates to our allowance policy documentation, model validation, governance and reporting, processes and related internal controls, as well as overall operational readiness were significant activities completed throughout 2019 in preparation for adoption.

The Company’s CECL methodology for loans and leases involves the following key factors and assumptions:


•	an estimation method utilizing probability of default and loss given default modeled results which are conditioned by macroeconomic scenarios;


•	a reasonable and supportable forecast period determined based on management’s current review of macroeconomic factors and economic scenarios;


•	a reversion period after the reasonable and supportable forecast period;


•	expected prepayment rates based on the Company’s historical experience; and


•	incorporation of qualitative factors not captured within the modeled results.

Based on several analyses performed in the third and fourth quarter of 2019, as well as an implementation analysis utilizing exposures and forecasts of macroeconomic conditions as of year-end, the Company currently expects the adoption of ASU 2016-13 will result in an allowance for credit losses amount at January 1, 2020 in the range of $215 million to $245 million, which includes unfunded commitments and held to maturity debt securities. The impact will be reflected as a cumulative effect adjustment, net of taxes. At December 31, 2019, the allowance for loan losses totaled $228 million. As the Company is currently finalizing the execution of its implementation controls and processes, the review of the most recent model run and assumptions including qualitative factors, the ultimate impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-13 as of January 1, 2020 could differ from our current expectation.

The cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings for the change in the allowance for credit losses upon adoption will not have a material effect on the Company’s capital and regulatory capital amounts and ratios. Federal banking regulatory agencies have provided relief for an initial capital decrease at transition by allowing a phased-in adoption which the Company will not elect.

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes”. The amendments simplify the accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions to general principles in Topic 740 and also clarify and amend existing guidance. This update will be effective for the Company January 1, 2021 with early

Table of Contents

adoption permitted. The Company does not expect ASU No. 2019-12 to have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other- Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force)”. This new guidance aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software. Specifically, where a cloud computing arrangement includes a license to internal-use software, the software license is accounted for by the customer in accordance with Subtopic 350-40, “Intangibles- Goodwill and Other-Internal-Use Software”. The Company adopted ASU 2018-15 on January 1, 2020. The amendments in this update will be applied prospectively to all implementation costs incurred after the date of adoption. The Company does not expect ASU No. 2018-15 to have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-14, “Compensation-Retirement Benefits-Defined Benefit Plans-General (Subtopic 715-20): Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans”. The amendments in this update modify the disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans by removing disclosures that no longer are considered cost beneficial, clarifying the specific requirements of disclosures, and adding disclosure requirements identified as relevant. This update will be effective for the Company January 1, 2021 with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect ASU 2018-14 to have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. This update will be applied on a retrospective basis. The Company will evaluate the effect of ASU 2018-14 on disclosures with regard to employee benefit plans but does not expect a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement”. The amendments remove the requirement to disclose the amount of, and reasons for, transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the policy for timing of such transfers and the valuation processes for Level 3 fair value measurements. The update modifies the disclosure requirements for investments in certain entities that calculate net asset value and clarify the purpose of the measurement uncertainty disclosure. The update adds disclosure requirements about the changes in unrealized gains and losses included in other comprehensive income for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements and the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements. The Company adopted this update on January 1, 2020. Changes will be applied retrospectively to all periods presented upon the effective date with the exception of the following, which will be applied prospectively: disclosures relating to changes in unrealized gains and losses, the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements, and the disclosures for uncertainty measurement. The adoption of ASU 2018-13 will not have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment”. This ASU simplifies subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating Step 2 of the impairment test while retaining the option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine whether the quantitative impairment test is necessary. The ASU also eliminates the requirements for any reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount to perform a qualitative assessment and, if it fails that qualitative test, to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. Therefore, the same impairment assessment applies to all reporting units. The Company adopted this update on January 1, 2020. The update will be applied prospectively. The Company does not expect ASU No. 2017-04 to have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.



ITEM 7A.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

For information regarding market risk see “Item 7. - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”



ITEM 8.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The Financial Statements are included in Part IV, Item 15 of this Form 10-K.



ITEM 9.	CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Not applicable.

Table of Contents



ITEM 9A.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.

With the participation of management, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2019. Based upon that evaluation, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that, as of that date, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

(b) Changes in internal controls.

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2019 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

The management of Investors Bancorp, Inc. is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Investors Bancorp’s internal control system is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s management and board of directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.

Our internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions and dispositions of assets; provide reasonable assurances that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and the directors of Investors Bancorp; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of Investors Bancorp’s assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Investors Bancorp’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019. In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013). Based on our assessment we believe that, as of December 31, 2019, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.

Investors Bancorp’s independent registered public accounting firm that audited the consolidated financial statements has issued an audit report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019. This report appears on page 65.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 302 Certifications have been filed with the SEC as Exhibit 31.1 and Exhibit 31.2 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



ITEM 9B.	OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable.

Part III



ITEM 10.	DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Information regarding directors, executive officers and corporate governance of the Company is incorporated herein by reference in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with respect to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 19, 2020.



ITEM 11.	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Information regarding executive compensation is incorporated herein by reference in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with respect to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 19, 2020.

Table of Contents



ITEM 12.	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Information regarding security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is incorporated herein by reference in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with respect to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 19, 2020. Information regarding equity compensation plans is incorporated herein by reference in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with respect to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 19, 2020.



ITEM 13.	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS, RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Information regarding certain relationships and related transactions, and director independence is incorporated herein by reference in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with respect to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 19, 2020.



ITEM 14.	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Information regarding principal accounting fees and services is incorporated herein by reference in Investors Bancorp’s definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with respect to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 19, 2020.

Part IV



ITEM 15.	EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a) (1) Financial Statements

Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors

Investors Bancorp, Inc.:

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Investors Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiary (the Company) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three‑year period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three‑year period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 28, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgment. The communication of a critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Assessment of the allowance for loan losses related to loans collectively evaluated for impairment

As discussed in Notes 1 and 5 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s allowance for loan losses related to loans collectively evaluated for impairment (ALLL) was $226.4 million of a total allowance for loan losses of $228.1 million as of December 31, 2019. The ALLL estimate consists of both quantitative and qualitative loss components. The Company determines the ALLL by applying quantitative loss factors to the loans collectively evaluated for impairment for each segment based upon type of loan, risk rating (if applicable) and payment history. Quantitative loss factors for each loan segment are generally determined based on the Company’s historical loss experience over a look-back period. Additionally, the Company adjusts each quantitative loss factor for the loss emergence period of each loan segment. The quantitative loss factors may also be adjusted for qualitative factors, both internal and external to the Company which are made to reflect risks inherent in the portfolio not captured by the quantitative component.

Table of Contents

We identified the assessment of ALLL as a critical audit matter because of the complex and significant auditor judgment that was involved. Specifically, complex and subjective auditor judgment was required to assess (1) the methodology and data used to derive the quantitative loss factors developed from the historical loss experience, (2) key assumptions, such as the segmenting of the loan portfolio with similar characteristics, the look-back period and the loss emergence period, (3) individual risk ratings assigned to commercial loans, and (4) development and evaluation of the qualitative factor framework.

The primary procedures we performed to address the critical audit matter included the following. We tested certain internal controls over the Company’s ALLL process, including controls related to the (1) development of the ALLL methodology, (2) determination of the key factors and assumptions used to estimate the quantitative loss factors, (3) periodic testing of individual risk ratings for commercial loans, (4) determination of the framework used to assess the qualitative factors and (5) analysis of the ALLL results, trends and ratios. We evaluated the segmenting of loans with similar characteristics by assessing the relevant characteristics of the loan portfolio, including the loan type, risk rating and payment status. We tested the relevance of sources of internal and external data and key assumptions, including the look-back period, by evaluating (1) if loss data in the look-back period is representative of the credit characteristics of the current portfolio and (2) the sufficiency of loss data within the look-back period. We assessed the loss emergence period assumptions by considering the Company’s credit risk policies and testing the relevance and reliability of the sources of data and assumptions of the Company’s observable loss experience study. We evaluated the metrics, including the relevance and reliability of the sources of data and assumptions, used to allocate the qualitative factor adjustments.

We involved credit risk professionals with specialized industry knowledge and experience who assisted in evaluating:


•	the Company’s allowance for loan losses methodology for compliance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles,


•	the look-back period assumptions to evaluate the length of that period,


•	the methodology used to develop the loss emergence periods,


•	the individual risk ratings for a selection of commercial loans,


•	the qualitative factor framework used to determine the relevant incremental risks not captured by the quantitative estimate, and


•	the framework used to develop the resulting qualitative factors and the effect of those factors on the ALLL compared with relevant credit risk factors and credit trends.

/s/ KPMG LLP

We have not been able to determine the specific year that we began serving as the Company’s auditor, however we are aware that we have served as the Company’s auditor since at least 1954.

Short Hills, New Jersey

February 28, 2020

Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors

Investors Bancorp, Inc.:

Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited Investors Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiary’s (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements), and our report dated February 28, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Short Hills, New Jersey

February 28, 2020

Table of Contents

INVESTORS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Consolidated Balance Sheets



	December 31, 2019			December 31, 2018
	(In thousands except share data)
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	174,915		196,891
Equity securities	6,039			5,793
Debt securities available-for-sale, at estimated fair value	2,695,390			2,122,162
Debt securities held-to-maturity, net (estimated fair value of $1,190,104 and $1,558,564 at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively)	1,148,815			1,555,137
Loans receivable, net	21,476,056			21,378,136
Loans held-for-sale	29,797			4,074
Federal Home Loan Bank stock	267,219			260,234
Accrued interest receivable	79,313			77,501
Other real estate owned and other repossessed assets	13,538			6,911
Office properties and equipment, net	169,614			177,432
Operating lease right-of-use assets	175,143			—
Net deferred tax asset	64,220			104,411
Bank owned life insurance	218,517			211,914
Goodwill and intangible assets	97,869			99,063
Other assets	82,321			29,349
Total assets	$	26,698,766		26,229,008
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities:
Deposits	$	17,860,338		17,580,269
Borrowed funds	5,827,111			5,435,681
Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance	121,719			129,891
Operating lease liabilities	185,827			—
Other liabilities	81,821			77,837
Total liabilities	24,076,816			23,223,678
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 authorized shares; none issued	—			—
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 1,000,000,000 shares authorized; 359,070,852 issued at December 31, 2019 and 2018; 247,439,902 and 286,273,114 outstanding at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively	3,591			3,591
Additional paid-in capital	2,822,364			2,805,423
Retained earnings	1,245,793			1,173,897
Treasury stock, at cost; 111,630,950 and 72,797,738 shares at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively	(1,352,910		)	(884,750	)
Unallocated common stock held by the employee stock ownership plan	(78,266		)	(81,262	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(18,622		)	(11,569	)
Total stockholders’ equity	2,621,950			3,005,330
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	26,698,766		26,229,008

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

INVESTORS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Consolidated Statements of Income



	For the Years Ended December 31,
	2019			2018		2017
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Interest and dividend income:
Loans receivable and loans held-for-sale	$	912,091		854,595		783,938
Securities:
Equity	143			134		139
Government-sponsored enterprise obligations	1,212			1,080		486
Mortgage-backed securities	95,133			80,906		70,827
Municipal bonds and other debt	11,494			13,060		10,762
Interest-bearing deposits	2,805			2,435		2,164
Federal Home Loan Bank stock	17,341			16,206		13,367
Total interest and dividend income	1,040,219			968,416		881,683
Interest expense:
Deposits	261,857			188,645		113,543
Borrowed Funds	123,289			99,754		88,364
Total interest expense	385,146			288,399		201,907
Net interest income	655,073			680,017		679,776
Provision for loan losses	(1,000		)	12,000		16,250
Net interest income after provision for loan losses	656,073			668,017		663,526
Non-interest income
Fees and service charges	23,604			22,142		20,326
Income on bank owned life insurance	6,542			5,926		3,742
Gain on loans, net	5,345			2,144		3,187
(Loss) gain on securities, net	(5,536		)	(31,604	)	1,275
Gain on sale of other real estate owned, net	1,145			923		591
Other income	22,313			10,550		6,516
Total non-interest income	53,413			10,081		35,637
Non-interest expense
Compensation and fringe benefits	243,782			235,928		227,177
Advertising and promotional expense	13,893			13,054		14,411
Office occupancy and equipment expense	63,996			63,539		61,509
Federal deposit insurance premiums	13,200			17,760		16,610
General and administrative	2,222			2,328		3,030
Professional fees	17,308			15,278		38,853
Data processing and communication	31,987			27,810		24,364
Other operating expenses	36,366			31,983		32,620
Total non-interest expenses	422,754			407,680		418,574
Income before income tax expense	286,732			270,418		280,589
Income tax expense	91,248			67,842		153,845
Net income	$	195,484		202,576		126,744
Basic earnings per share	$	0.75		0.72		0.44
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.74		0.72		0.43
Weighted average shares outstanding
Basic	262,202,598			281,925,219		290,183,952
Diluted	262,519,788			282,791,859		291,966,475

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

INVESTORS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income



	For the Years Ended December 31,
	2019			2018		2017
	(In thousands)
Net income	$	195,484		202,576		126,744
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax:
Change in funded status of retirement obligations	(3,672		)	2,622		(745	)
Unrealized gains (losses) on debt securities available-for-sale	34,119			(11,296	)	(8,148	)
Accretion of loss on debt securities reclassified to held to maturity	535			599		468
Reclassification adjustment for security losses (gains) included in net income	4,221			24,202		(765	)
Other-than-temporary impairment accretion on debt securities	768			3,085		(1,612	)
Net (losses) gains on derivatives arising during the period	(43,024		)	(836	)	6,063
Total other comprehensive (loss) income	(7,053		)	18,376		(4,739	)
Total comprehensive income	$	188,431		220,952		122,005

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

INVESTORS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

Year ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017



	Common stock		Additional paid-in capital		Retained earnings		Treasury stock		Unallocated Common Stock Held by ESOP		Accumulated other comprehensive loss		Total stockholders’ equity
	(In thousands except share data)
Balance at December 31, 2016	$	3,591	2,765,732		1,053,750		(587,974	)	(87,254	)	(24,600	)	3,123,245
Net income	—		—		126,744		—		—		—		126,744
Effect of adopting ASU No. 2018-02	—		—		4,629		—		—		(4,629	)	—
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax	—		—		—		—		—		(110	)	(110	)
Purchase of treasury stock (4,463,669 shares)	—		—		—		(59,090	)	—		—		(59,090	)
Treasury stock allocated to restricted stock plan (440,000 shares)	—		(6,329	)	1,030		5,299		—		—		—
Compensation cost for stock options and restricted stock	—		20,542		—		—		—		—		20,542
Exercise of stock options	—		(3,689	)	—		12,830		—		—		9,141
Restricted stock forfeitures (367,734 shares)	—		4,601		(426	)	(4,175	)	—		—		—
Cash dividend paid ($0.33 per common share)	—		—		(101,550	)	—		—		—		(101,550	)
ESOP shares allocated or committed to be released	—		3,533		—		—		2,996		—		6,529
Balance at December 31, 2017	3,591		2,784,390		1,084,177		(633,110	)	(84,258	)	(29,339	)	3,125,451
Net income	—		—		202,576		—		—		—		202,576
Effect of adopting ASU No. 2016-01	—		—		606		—		—		(606	)	—
Other comprehensive income, net of tax	—		—		—		—		—		18,376		18,376
Purchase of treasury stock (20,380,355 shares)	—		—		—		(258,175	)	—		—		(258,175	)
Treasury stock allocated to restricted stock plan (91,982 shares)	—		(1,178	)	57		1,121		—		—		—
Compensation cost for stock options and restricted stock	—		18,437		—		—		—		—		18,437
Exercise of stock options	—		(4,280	)	—		10,023		—		—		5,743
Restricted stock forfeitures (392,946 shares)	—		4,942		(333	)	(4,609	)	—		—		—
Cash dividend paid ($0.38 per common share)	—		—		(113,186	)	—		—		—		(113,186	)
ESOP shares allocated or committed to be released	—		3,112		—		—		2,996		—		6,108
Balance at December 31, 2018	3,591		2,805,423		1,173,897		(884,750	)	(81,262	)	(11,569	)	3,005,330
Net income	—		—		195,484		—		—		—		195,484
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax	—		—		—		—		—		(7,053	)	(7,053	)
Purchase of treasury stock (39,365,145 shares)	—		—		—		(475,946	)	—		—		(475,946	)
Treasury stock allocated to restricted stock plan (2,360,919 shares)	—		(29,321	)	31		29,290		—		—		—
Compensation cost for stock options and restricted stock	—		19,968		—		—		—		—		19,968
Exercise of stock options	—		(573	)	—		1,387		—		—		814
Restricted stock forfeitures (1,940,788 shares)	—		24,347		(1,456	)	(22,891	)	—		—		—
Cash dividend paid ($0.44 per common share)	—		—		(122,163	)	—		—		—		(122,163	)
ESOP shares allocated or committed to be released	—		2,520		—		—		2,996		—		5,516
Balance at December 31, 2019	$	3,591	2,822,364		1,245,793		(1,352,910	)	(78,266	)	(18,622	)	2,621,950

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

INVESTORS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows



	For the Years Ended December 31,
	2019			2018		2017
	(In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	195,484		202,576		126,744
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
ESOP and stock-based compensation expense	25,484			24,545		27,071
Amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts on securities, net	9,251			10,728		15,077
Amortization of premiums and accretion of fees and costs on loans, net	(3,730		)	(6,571	)	(4,506	)
Amortization of other intangible assets	1,520			1,974		2,427
Amortization of debt modification costs	1,186			—		—
Provision for loan losses	(1,000		)	12,000		16,250
Depreciation and amortization of office properties and equipment	19,579			17,104		17,421
Loss (gain) on securities, net	5,536			31,604		(1,275	)
Mortgage loans originated for sale	(269,773		)	(65,525	)	(140,171	)
Proceeds from mortgage loan sales	247,640			68,202		175,669
Gain on sales of mortgage loans, net	(3,590		)	(1,566	)	(2,384	)
Gain on sale of other real estate owned	(1,145		)	(923	)	(591	)
Income on bank owned life insurance	(6,542		)	(5,926	)	(3,742	)
Amortization of operating lease right-of-use assets	17,608			—		—
Increase in accrued interest receivable	(1,812		)	(4,646	)	(6,886	)
Deferred tax expense	45,624			15,513		100,008
(Increase) decrease in other assets	(42,170		)	(23,085	)	19,840
Decrease in other liabilities	(78,496		)	(429	)	(38,542	)
Total adjustments	(34,830		)	72,999		175,666
Net cash provided by operating activities	160,654			275,575		302,410
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of loans receivable	(427,053		)	(514,040	)	(540,898	)
Net payoffs (originations) of loans receivable	101,227			(703,577	)	(807,105	)
Proceeds from disposition of loans receivable	227,522			11,477		48,902
Gain on disposition of loans receivable	(1,755		)	(1,251	)	(803	)
Gain on disposition of leased equipment	(5,698		)	—		—
Net proceeds from sale of other real estate owned	6,498			6,187		4,751
Proceeds from sales/calls of equity securities	—			—		1,000
Proceeds from principal repayments/calls/maturities of debt securities available for sale	492,419			384,181		338,049
Proceeds from sales of debt securities available for sale	399,435			632,444		102,120
Proceeds from principal repayments/calls/maturities of debt securities held to maturity	251,574			301,309		321,294
Purchases of equity securities	(96		)	(90	)	(86	)
Purchases of debt securities available for sale	(1,034,131		)	(1,182,036	)	(785,831	)
Purchases of debt securities held to maturity	(238,670		)	(54,836	)	(364,837	)
Proceeds from redemptions of Federal Home Loan Bank stock	303,245			252,176		180,599
Purchases of Federal Home Loan Bank stock	(310,230		)	(280,866	)	(174,265	)
Purchases of office properties and equipment	(11,761		)	(14,305	)	(20,235	)
Death benefit proceeds from bank owned life insurance	—			3,618		10,047
Purchases of bank owned life insurance	—			(125,000	)	—
Proceeds from surrender of bank owned life insurance contract	—			71,029		—
Cash paid for acquisition	—			(340,183	)	—

Table of Contents



Net cash used in investing activities	(247,474		)	(1,553,763	)	(1,687,298	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase in deposits	280,069			222,572		2,076,864
Repayments of principal under finance leases	(2		)	—		—
Net increase (decrease) in funds borrowed under other repurchase agreements	197,584			120,000		(23,000	)
Net increase (decrease) in borrowed funds	192,660			854,148		(61,718	)
Net (decrease) increase in advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance	(8,172		)	25,583		(1,543	)
Dividends paid	(122,163		)	(113,186	)	(101,550	)
Exercise of stock options	814			5,743		9,141
Purchase of treasury stock	(475,946		)	(258,175	)	(59,090	)
Net cash provided by financing activities	64,844			856,685		1,839,104
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	(21,976		)	(421,503	)	454,216
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	196,891			618,394		164,178
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	174,915		196,891		618,394
Supplemental cash flow information:
Non-cash investing activities:
Real estate acquired through foreclosure and other assets repossessed	$	12,567		6,674		5,913
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest	$	390,359		275,525		197,810
Income taxes	$	36,146		69,271		101,948
Significant non-cash transactions
Debt securities transferred from held-to-maturity to available-for-sale	$	393,359		—		—
Loans transferred to held-for-sale portfolio	$	28,373		—		—
Investment in low income housing tax credit	$	10,000		—		—
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new lease liabilities	$	2,996		—		—
Acquisitions:
Non-cash assets acquired:
Loans	$	—		330,747		—
Goodwill and other intangible assets, net	$	—		4,975		—
Total non-cash assets acquired	$	—		335,722		—

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

INVESTORS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

The following significant accounting and reporting policies of Investors Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiary (collectively, the Company) conform to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), and are used in preparing and presenting these consolidated financial statements.


(a)	Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements are comprised of the accounts of Investors Bancorp, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Investors Bank (the “Bank”) and the Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”). All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain reclassifications have been made in the consolidated financial statements to conform with current year classifications. In the opinion of management, all the adjustments (consisting of normal and recurring adjustments) necessary for the fair presentation of the consolidated financial condition and the consolidated results of operations for the periods presented have been included. The results of operations and other data presented for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that may be expected for subsequent years.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. The estimate of our allowance for loan losses, the valuation of deferred tax assets, impairment judgments and fair value regarding securities, stock-based compensation and derivative instruments involve a higher degree of complexity and subjectivity and require estimates and assumptions about highly uncertain matters. Actual results may differ from our estimates and assumptions. The current economic environment has increased the degree of uncertainty inherent in these material estimates.

Business

Investors Bancorp, Inc.’s primary business is holding the common stock of the Bank and a loan to the Investors Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan. The Bank provides banking services to customers primarily through branch offices in New Jersey and New York. The Bank’s competition for loans and deposits comes principally from commercial banks, savings institutions, mortgage banking firms, credit unions and insurance companies. The Company faces additional competition for deposits from short-term money market funds, brokerage firms and mutual funds and is subject to the regulations of certain federal and state regulatory authorities and undergoes periodic examinations by those regulatory authorities.


(b)	Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents consist of cash on hand, amounts due from banks and interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions. The Company is required by the Federal Reserve System to maintain cash reserves equal to a percentage of certain deposits. The reserve requirement totaled $67.7 million at December 31, 2019 and $67.5 million at December 31, 2018.


(c)	Securities

The Company’s securities portfolio includes equity securities, debt securities held-to-maturity and debt securities available-for-sale. Management determines the appropriate classification of securities at the time of purchase. If management has the positive intent not to sell and the Company would not be required to sell a debt security prior to maturity, it is classified as held-to-maturity. Such securities are stated at amortized cost, adjusted for unamortized purchase premiums and discounts. Securities in the available-for-sale category are securities which the Company may sell prior to maturity. Available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value with any unrealized appreciation or depreciation, net of tax effects, reported as accumulated other comprehensive income/loss in stockholders’ equity. Discounts and premiums on debt securities are accreted or amortized using the level-yield method over the estimated lives of the securities, including the effect of prepayments. Realized gains and losses are recognized when securities are sold or called using the specific identification method. Unrealized gains and losses on equity securities are recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

The Company periodically evaluates the securities portfolio for other-than-temporary impairment. Other-than-temporary impairment means the Company believes the security’s impairment is due to factors that could include its inability to pay interest or dividends, its potential for default, and/or other factors. In accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 320, “Investments — Debt Securities”, when a held-to-maturity or available-for-sale debt security is assessed for other-than-temporary impairment, the Company has to first consider (a) whether it intends to sell the security, and (b) whether it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security prior to recovery

Table of Contents

of its amortized cost basis. If one of these circumstances applies to a debt security for which a determination has been made that a debt security is other-than-temporarily impaired, an other-than-temporary impairment loss is recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income equal to the full amount of the decline in fair value below amortized cost. If neither of these circumstances applies to a debt security, but the Company does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis, an other-than-temporary impairment loss has occurred that must be separated into two categories: (a) the amount related to credit loss, and (b) the amount related to other factors. In assessing the level of other-than-temporary impairment attributable to credit loss, the Company compares the present value of cash flows expected to be collected with the amortized cost basis of the security. The portion of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to credit loss is recognized in non-interest income as a component of gain (loss) on securities, net in the Consolidated Statements of Income, while the amount related to other factors is recorded as an adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax. When a debt security becomes other-than-temporarily impaired, its amortized cost basis is reduced to reflect the portion of the total impairment related to credit loss.

To determine whether a security’s impairment is other-than-temporary, the Company considers factors that include, the duration and severity of the impairment; the Company’s ability and intent to hold security investments until they recover in value (as well as the likelihood of such a recovery in the near term); the Company’s intent to sell security investments; and whether it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell such securities before recovery of their individual amortized cost basis less any current-period credit loss. For debt securities, the primary consideration in determining whether impairment is other-than-temporary is whether or not it is probable that current or future contractual cash flows have been or may be impaired.


(d)	Loans Receivable, Net

Loans receivable, other than loans held-for-sale, are stated at unpaid principal balance, adjusted for unamortized premiums, unearned discounts, deferred origination fees and costs, net purchase accounting adjustments, hedged items and the allowance for loan losses. Interest income on loans is accrued and credited to income as earned. Premiums and discounts on purchased loans and net loan origination fees and costs are deferred and amortized to interest income over the estimated life of the loan as an adjustment to yield.

Also included in loans receivable are direct finance leases which are stated as the sum of remaining minimum lease payments from lessees plus estimated residual values less unearned lease income. At the inception of each lease, the Company records a residual value for the leased equipment based on its estimate of the future value of the equipment at the end of the lease term or end of the equipment’s estimated useful life. On an annual basis, the Company reviews the lease residuals for potential impairment.

The allowance for loan losses is impacted by the provision for loan losses charged to earnings and is decreased by charge-offs, net of recoveries. The provision for loan losses is based on management’s evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance which considers, among other things, the Company’s past loan loss experience (using the appropriate look-back and loss emergence periods), known and inherent risks in the portfolio, existing adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral and current economic conditions. While management uses available information to recognize estimated losses on loans, future additions may be necessary based on changes in economic or other conditions. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Company’s allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require the Company to recognize additions to the allowance based upon their judgments and information available to them at the time of their examinations.

A loan is considered delinquent when we have not received a payment within 30 days of its contractual due date. The accrual of income on loans is discontinued when interest or principal payments are 90 days in arrears or when the timely collection of such income is doubtful. Loans on which the accrual of income has been discontinued are designated as non-accrual loans and outstanding interest previously credited is reversed. Interest income on non-accrual loans and impaired loans is recognized in the period collected unless the ultimate collection of principal is considered doubtful. A loan is returned to accrual status when all amounts due have been received and the remaining principal is deemed collectible. Loans are generally charged off after an analysis is completed which indicates that collectability of the full principal balance is in doubt.

The Company defines an impaired loan as a loan for which it is probable, based on current information, that the lender will not collect all amounts due under the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The Company evaluates commercial loans with an outstanding balance greater than $1.0 million and on non-accrual status, loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”), and other commercial loans with $1.0 million in outstanding principal if management has specific information that it is probable they will not collect all amounts due under the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans are individually evaluated to determine that the loan’s carrying value is not in excess of the fair value of the collateral or the present value of the expected future cash flows. Smaller balance homogeneous loans are evaluated for impairment collectively unless they are modified in a troubled debt restructure. Such loans include residential mortgage loans, consumer loans, and loans not meeting the Company’s definition of impaired, and are specifically excluded from impaired loans.

Purchased Credit-Impaired (“PCI”) loans, are loans acquired at a discount due, in part, to credit quality. PCI loans are accounted for in accordance with ASC Subtopic 310-30, “Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality”,

Table of Contents

and are initially recorded at fair value (as determined by the present value of expected future cash flows) with no valuation allowance (i.e., the allowance for loan losses). The difference between the undiscounted cash flows expected at acquisition and the initial carrying amount (fair value) of the PCI loans, or the “accretable yield,” is recognized as interest income utilizing the level-yield method over the life of the loans. Contractually required payments for interest and principal that exceed the undiscounted cash flows expected at acquisition, or the “non-accretable difference,” are not recognized as a yield adjustment, as a loss accrual or a valuation allowance. Reclassifications of the non-accretable difference to the accretable yield may occur subsequent to the loan acquisition dates due to increases in expected cash flows of the loans and would result in an increase in yield on a prospective basis.


(e)	Loans Held-for-Sale

Loans held-for-sale are carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair value. Net unrealized losses, if any, are recognized in a valuation allowance through charges to earnings. Premiums and discounts and origination fees and costs on loans held-for-sale are deferred and recognized as a component of the gain or loss on sale. Gains and losses on sales of loans held-for-sale are recognized on settlement dates and are determined by the difference between the sale proceeds and the carrying value of the loans. These transactions are accounted for as sales based on our satisfaction of the criteria for such accounting which provide that, as transferor, we have surrendered control over the loans.


(f)	Stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank

The Bank, as a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York (“FHLB”), is required to hold shares of capital stock of the FHLB based on our activities, primarily our outstanding borrowings, with the FHLB. The stock is carried at cost, less any impairment.


(g)	Office Properties and Equipment, Net

Land is carried at cost. Office buildings, leasehold improvements and furniture, fixtures and equipment are carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Office buildings and furniture, fixtures and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the terms of the respective leases or the lives of the assets, whichever is shorter.


(h)	Right-of-Use Assets

The determination of the presence of a lease in a contract is performed at the inception date. At the lease commencement date, the Company recognizes a right-of-use asset and a related lease liability for leases with an original term longer than twelve months. Right-of-use assets represent the Corporation’s right to use an underlying asset for the lease term, and lease liabilities represent the obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease initially measured at the present value of future lease payments. The Company has operating leases for corporate offices, branch location and certain equipment. Operating leases are capitalized at commencement and are discounted using the rate implicit in the lease unless that amount cannot be readily determined, in which case the Company is required to use its FHLB borrowing rate, which reflects the rates a lender would charge the Company to obtain a collateralized loan. For operating leases existing prior to January 1, 2019, the rate for the remaining lease term as of January 1, 2019 was used.


(i)	Bank Owned Life Insurance

Bank owned life insurance is carried at the amount that could be realized under the Company’s life insurance contracts as of the date of the Consolidated Balance Sheets and is classified as a non-interest earning asset. Increases in the carrying value are recorded as non-interest income in the Consolidated Statements of Income and insurance proceeds received are generally recorded as a reduction of the carrying value. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the carrying value is the cash surrender value of $218.5 million and $211.9 million, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company purchased $125.0 million of bank owned life insurance and surrendered the policies with the claims stabilization reserve and deferred acquisition costs for full settlement of $71.0 million. The Company’s current policies do not contain a claims stabilization reserve or any deferred acquisition costs.


(j)	Intangible Assets

Goodwill. Goodwill is presumed to have an indefinite useful life and is tested, at least annually, for impairment at the reporting unit level. Impairment exists when the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. For purposes of our goodwill impairment testing, we have identified the Bank as a single reporting unit.

At December 31, 2019, the carrying amount of our goodwill totaled $82.5 million. In connection with our annual impairment assessment we applied the guidance in FASB Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2011-08, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment, which permits an entity to make a qualitative assessment of whether it

Table of Contents

is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying amount. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company’s qualitative assessment concluded that it was not more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount.

Mortgage Servicing Rights. The Company recognizes as separate assets the rights to service mortgage loans. The right to service loans for others is generally obtained through the sale of loans with servicing retained. The initial asset recognized for originated mortgage servicing rights (“MSR”) is measured at fair value. The estimated fair value of MSR is obtained through independent third party valuations through an analysis of future cash flows, incorporating assumptions market participants would use in determining fair value including market discount rates, prepayment speeds, servicing income, servicing costs, default rates and other market driven data, including the market’s perception of future interest rate movements. MSR are amortized in proportion to and over the period of estimated net servicing income. We apply the amortization method for measurements of our MSR. MSR are assessed for impairment based on fair value at each reporting date. MSR impairment, if any, is recognized in a valuation allowance through charges to earnings as a component of fees and service charges. Subsequent increases in the fair value of impaired MSR are recognized only up to the amount of the previously recognized valuation allowance. Fees earned for servicing loans are reported as income when the related mortgage loan payments are collected.

Core Deposit Premiums. Core deposit premiums represent the intangible value of depositor relationships assumed in purchase acquisitions and are amortized on an accelerated basis over 20 years. The Company periodically evaluates the value of core deposit premiums to ensure the carrying amount exceeds it implied fair value.


(k)	Other Real Estate Owned and Other Repossessed Assets

Properties and other assets acquired through foreclosure, deed in lieu of foreclosure or repossession are carried at estimated fair value, less estimated selling costs. The estimated fair value of real property is based on independent appraisals. The estimated fair value of repossessed assets is based on cost where market comparable values are not available. Write-downs required at the time of acquisition are charged to the allowance for loan losses. Thereafter, decreases in the properties’ estimated fair value are charged to income along with any additional property maintenance and protection expenses incurred in owning the properties.


(l)	Borrowed Funds

Our FHLB borrowings are advances collateralized by our residential and commercial mortgage portfolios. In addition, the Bank had uncommitted unsecured overnight borrowing lines with other institutions totaling $750.0 million, of which $400.0 million was outstanding at December 31, 2019.

The Bank also enters into sales of securities under agreements to repurchase with selected brokers and the FHLB. The securities underlying the agreements are delivered to the counterparty who agrees to resell to the Bank the identical securities at the maturity or call of the agreement. These agreements are recorded as financing transactions, as the Bank maintains effective control over the transferred securities, and no gain or loss is recognized. The dollar amount of the securities underlying the agreements continues to be carried in the Bank’s securities portfolio. The obligations to repurchase the securities are reported as a liability in the consolidated balance sheets.


(m)	Income Taxes

The Company records income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, “Income Taxes,” as amended, using the asset and liability method. Accordingly, deferred tax assets and liabilities: (i) are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the financial statements or tax returns; (ii) are attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases; and (iii) are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply in the years when those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The ultimate realization of the deferred tax asset is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences and carryforwards became deductible. Where applicable, deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance for any portions determined not likely to be realized. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income tax expense in the period of enactment. The valuation allowance is adjusted, by a charge or credit to income tax expense, as changes in facts and circumstances warrant. The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits, where applicable, in income tax expense.


(n)	Employee Benefits

The Company has a defined-benefit pension plan which operates as a multi-employer plan for accounting purposes and as a multiple-employer plan under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and the Internal Revenue Code. As of December 31, 2016, the annual benefit provided under the Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan for Financial Institutions (“Pentegra DB Plan”) was frozen by an amendment to the plan. Freezing the plan eliminates all future benefit accruals and each participant’s frozen accrued benefit was determined as of December 31, 2016 and no further benefits will accrue beyond such date.

Table of Contents

The Company has an Executive Supplemental Retirement Wage Replacement Plan (“SERP II”) and the Supplemental ESOP and Retirement Plan (“SERP I”) (collectively, the “SERPs”). The SERP II is a nonqualified, defined benefit plan which provides benefits to certain executives as designated by the Compensation and Benefits Committee of the Board of Directors. More specifically, the SERP II was designed to provide participants with a normal retirement benefit equal to an annual benefit of 60% of the participant’s highest annual base salary and cash incentive (over a consecutive 36-month period within the participant’s credited service period) reduced by the sum of the benefits provided under the Pentegra DB Plan and SERP I.

Effective as of the close of business of December 31, 2016, the SERP II was amended to freeze future benefit accruals subsequent to the 2016 year of service.

The Company has a 401(k) plan covering substantially all employees. The Company currently matches 50% of the first 8% contributed by participants and recognizes expense as its contributions are made. In addition, the 401(k) plan includes a discretionary profit sharing plan for eligible employees.

The employee stock ownership plan (“ESOP”) is accounted for in accordance with the provisions of ASC 718-40, “Employers’ Accounting for Employee Stock Ownership Plans.” The funds borrowed by the ESOP from the Company to purchase the Company’s common stock are being repaid from the Bank’s contributions over a period of up to 30 years. The Company’s common stock not yet allocated to participants is recorded as a reduction of stockholders’ equity at cost. Compensation expense for the ESOP is based on the market price of the Company’s stock and is recognized as shares are committed to be released to participants due to the repayment of the loan by the ESOP to the Company.

The Company recognizes the cost of employee services received in exchange for awards of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of those awards in accordance with ASC 718, “Compensation-Stock Compensation”. The Company estimates the per share fair value of option grants on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using assumptions for the expected dividend yield, expected stock price volatility, risk-free interest rate and expected option term. These assumptions are subjective in nature, involve uncertainties and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision. The Black-Scholes option pricing model also contains certain inherent limitations when applied to options that are not traded on public markets.

The per share fair value of options is highly sensitive to changes in assumptions. In general, the per share fair value of options will move in the same direction as changes in the expected stock price volatility, risk-free interest rate and expected option term, and in the opposite direction as changes in the expected dividend yield. For example, the per share fair value of options will generally increase as expected stock price volatility increases, risk-free interest rate increases, expected option term increases and expected dividend yield decreases. The use of different assumptions or different option pricing models could result in materially different per share fair values of options.


(o)	Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per common share, or EPS, are computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average common shares outstanding during the year. The weighted-average common shares outstanding includes the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding less the weighted average number of unvested shares of restricted stock and unallocated shares held by the ESOP. For EPS calculations, ESOP shares that have been committed to be released are considered outstanding. ESOP shares that have not been committed to be released are excluded from outstanding shares on a weighted average basis for EPS calculations.

Diluted EPS is computed using the same method as basic EPS, but includes the effect of all potentially dilutive common shares that were outstanding during the period, such as unexercised stock options and unvested shares of restricted stock, calculated using the treasury stock method. When applying the treasury stock method, we add: (1) the assumed proceeds from option exercises and (2) the average unamortized compensation costs related to unvested shares of restricted stock and stock options. We then divide this sum by our average stock price to calculate shares repurchased. The excess of the number of shares issuable over the number of shares assumed to be repurchased is added to basic weighted average common shares to calculate diluted EPS.


(p)	Derivative Financial Instruments

As required by ASC 815, the Company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether the Company has elected to designate a derivative in a hedging relationship and apply hedge accounting and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges. Hedge accounting generally provides for the matching of the timing of gain or loss recognition on the hedging instrument with the recognition of the changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk in a fair value hedge or the earnings effect of the hedged forecasted transactions in a cash flow hedge. The Company may enter into derivative contracts that are intended to economically hedge certain of its risks, even though hedge accounting does not apply or the Company elects not to apply hedge accounting.

Table of Contents

2. Stock Transactions

Stock Repurchase Programs

On October 25, 2018, the Company announced its fourth share repurchase program, which authorized the purchase of 10% of its publicly-held outstanding shares of common stock, or 28,886,780 shares. The fourth program commenced immediately upon completion of the third program on December 10, 2018 and remains the Company’s current program as of December 31, 2019.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company purchased 39,365,145 shares at a cost of $475.9 million, or approximately $12.09 per share. During December 2019, we entered into a purchase and sale agreement with Blue Harbour Group, L.P. (“Blue Harbour”), pursuant to which we repurchased from Blue Harbour the 27,318,628 shares of our common stock beneficially owned by Blue Harbour, at a purchase price of $12.29 per share, representing aggregate consideration of approximately $335.7 million. This share repurchase was outside of, and did not count toward, our existing share repurchase program. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company purchased 20,380,355 shares at a cost of $258.2 million, or approximately $12.67 per share. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company purchased 4,463,669 shares at a cost of $59.1 million, or approximately $13.24 per share.

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, shares repurchased include 387,477, 395,233 and 313,269 shares, respectively, withheld to cover income taxes related to restricted stock vesting under our 2015 Equity Incentive Plan. Shares withheld to pay income taxes are repurchased pursuant to the terms of the 2015 Equity Incentive Plan.

Cash Dividends

Since September 2012, we have paid a quarterly cash dividend. Dividends paid for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 were $0.44, $0.38 and $0.33, resulting in dividend payout ratios of 59%, 53% and 75%, respectively.

3. Business Combinations

Gold Coast Bancorp

On July 24, 2019, the Company and Gold Coast Bancorp, Inc. (“Gold Coast”) signed a definitive merger agreement under which the Company will acquire Gold Coast. Consideration will be paid to Gold Coast stockholders in a combination of stock and cash. Under the terms of the merger agreement, 50% of the common shares of Gold Coast will be converted into Investors Bancorp common stock and the remaining 50% will be exchanged for cash. For each share of Gold Coast Bancorp common stock, Gold Coast shareholders will have the option to receive either (i) 1.422 shares of Investors Bancorp common stock, $0.01 par value per share, (ii) a cash payment of $15.75, or (iii) a combination of Investors Bancorp common stock and cash. The foregoing is subject to proration to ensure that, in the aggregate, 50% of Gold Coast’s shares will be converted into Investors Bancorp common stock. Completion of the merger is awaiting receipt of all regulatory approvals. The transaction is not reflected in the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Equipment Finance Portfolio

On February 2, 2018, the Company completed the acquisition of a $345.8 million equipment finance portfolio. The acquisition included a seven-person team of financing professionals to lead the Company’s Equipment Finance Group. This group is part of the Company’s commercial lending group and the loan and lease balances are included within our commercial and industrial loan portfolio. The purchase price of $340.2 million was paid using available cash.

The acquisition was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting as prescribed by FASB ASC 805 “Business Combinations”, as amended. Under this method of accounting, the purchase price has been allocated to the respective assets acquired based on their estimated fair values, net of applicable income tax effects. The excess cost over fair value of assets acquired, or $5.0 million, has been recorded as goodwill.

The acquired portfolio was fair valued on the date of acquisition based on guidance from ASC 820-10 which defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The valuation methods utilized took into consideration adjustments for interest rate risk, funding cost, servicing cost, residual risk, credit and liquidity risk. The accounting for the acquisition of the equipment finance portfolio is complete and is reflected in our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

4. Securities

Equity Securities

Equity securities are reported at fair value on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company’s portfolio of equity securities had an estimated fair value of $6.0 million and $5.8 million as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. Realized gains and losses from sales of equity securities, as well as changes in fair value of equity securities still held at the reporting date are recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

The following table presents the disaggregated net gains on equity securities reported in the Consolidated Statements of Income:



	For the Year Ended December 31,
	2019		2018	2017
	(In thousands)
Net gains recognized on equity securities	$	150	2	—
Less: Net gains recognized on equity securities sold	—		—	—
Unrealized gains recognized on equity securities	$	150	2	—

Debt Securities

The following tables present the carrying value, gross unrealized gains and losses and estimated fair value for available-for-sale debt securities and the amortized cost, net unrealized losses, carrying value, gross unrecognized gains and losses and estimated fair value for held-to-maturity debt securities as of the dates indicated. During the second quarter of 2019, the Company early adopted ASU 2019-04, “Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial Instruments” and reclassified $393.1 million of debt securities held-to-maturity to debt securities available-for-sale. See Note 22, Recent Accounting Pronouncements, for further details regarding the adoption of ASU 2019-04.



	At December 31, 2019
	Carrying value		Gross unrealized gains	Gross unrealized losses	Estimated fair value
	(In thousands)
Available-for-sale:
Mortgage-backed securities:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation	$	1,223,587	17,528	736	1,240,379
Federal National Mortgage Association	1,159,446		18,917	314	1,178,049
Government National Mortgage Association	273,676		3,333	47	276,962
Total debt securities available-for-sale	$	2,656,709	39,778	1,097	2,695,390

Table of Contents



	At December 31, 2019
	Amortized cost		Net unrealized losses ⁽¹⁾	Carrying value	Gross unrecognized gains ⁽²⁾	Gross unrecognized losses ⁽²⁾	Estimated fair value
	(In thousands)
Held-to-maturity:
Debt securities:
Government-sponsored enterprises	$	58,624	—	58,624	188	500	58,312
Municipal bonds	143,151		—	143,151	3,797	43	146,905
Corporate and other debt securities	87,322		14,785	72,537	26,158	—	98,695
Total debt securities held-to-maturity	289,097		14,785	274,312	30,143	543	303,912
Mortgage-backed securities:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation	262,079		134	261,945	3,533	129	265,349
Federal National Mortgage Association	542,583		373	542,210	7,959	307	549,862
Government National Mortgage Association	70,348		—	70,348	633	—	70,981
Total mortgage-backed securities held-to-maturity	875,010		507	874,503	12,125	436	886,192
Total debt securities held-to-maturity	$	1,164,107	15,292	1,148,815	42,268	979	1,190,104

(1) Net unrealized losses of held-to-maturity corporate and other debt securities represent the other than temporary charge related to other non-credit factors and is being amortized through accumulated other comprehensive income over the remaining life of the securities. For mortgage-backed securities, it represents the net loss on previously designated available-for sale debt securities transferred to held-to-maturity at fair value and is being amortized through accumulated other comprehensive income over the remaining life of the securities.

(2) Unrecognized gains and losses of held-to-maturity debt securities are not reflected in the financial statements, as they represent fair value fluctuations from the later of: (i) the date a security is designated as held-to-maturity; or (ii) the date that an other than temporary impairment charge is recognized on a held-to-maturity security, through the date of the balance sheet.



	At December 31, 2018
	Carrying value		Gross unrealized gains	Gross unrealized losses	Estimated fair value
	(In thousands)
Available-for-sale:
Mortgage-backed securities:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation	$	988,348	6,492	8,190	986,650
Federal National Mortgage Association	980,546		3,560	15,550	968,556
Government National Mortgage Association	165,211		1,745	—	166,956
Total debt securities available-for-sale	$	2,134,105	11,797	23,740	2,122,162

Table of Contents



	At December 31, 2018
	Amortized cost		Net unrealized losses ⁽¹⁾	Carrying Value	Gross unrecognized gains ⁽²⁾	Gross unrecognized losses ⁽²⁾	Estimated fair value
	(In thousands)
Held-to-maturity:
Debt securities:
Government-sponsored enterprises	$	41,258	—	41,258	—	1,236	40,022
Municipal bonds	25,513		—	25,513	942	—	26,455
Corporate and other debt securities	66,295		15,854	50,441	36,592	—	87,033
Total debt securities held-to-maturity	133,066		15,854	117,212	37,534	1,236	153,510
Mortgage-backed securities:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation	402,231		595	401,636	112	9,413	392,335
Federal National Mortgage Association	955,237		689	954,548	535	22,687	932,396
Government National Mortgage Association	81,741		—	81,741	—	1,418	80,323
Total mortgage-backed securities held-to-maturity	1,439,209		1,284	1,437,925	647	33,518	1,405,054
Total held-to-maturity securities	$	1,572,275	17,138	1,555,137	38,181	34,754	1,558,564

(2) Unrecognized gains and losses of held-to-maturity debt securities are not reflected in the financial statements, as they represent fair value fluctuations from the later of: (i) the date a security is designated as held-to-maturity; or (ii) the date that an other-than-temporary impairment charge is recognized on a held-to-maturity security, through the date of the balance sheet.

At December 31, 2019, corporate and other debt securities include a portfolio of collateralized debt obligations backed by pooled trust preferred securities (“TruPs”), principally issued by banks and to a lesser extent insurance companies and real estate investment trusts. At December 31, 2019 the TruPs had a carrying value and estimated fair value of $47.5 million and $73.3 million, respectively. While all were investment grade at purchase, securities classified as non-investment grade at December 31, 2019 had a carrying value and estimated fair value of $45.8 million and $69.0 million, respectively. Fair value is derived from considering specific assumptions, including terms of the TruPs structure, events of deferrals, defaults and liquidations, the projected cash flow for principal and interest payments, and discounted cash flow modeling.

Debt securities with a carrying value of $920.5 million and an estimated fair value of $932.9 million are pledged to secure borrowings and municipal deposits. The contractual maturities of the Bank’s mortgage-backed securities are generally less than 20 years with effective lives expected to be shorter due to prepayments. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities due to underlying loan prepayments or early call privileges of the issuer; therefore, mortgage-backed securities are not included in the following table. The amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities other than mortgage-backed securities at December 31, 2019, by contractual maturity, are shown below.



	December 31, 2019
	Carrying Value		Estimated fair value
	(In thousands)
Due in one year or less	$	10,579	10,579
Due after one year through five years	—		—
Due after five years through ten years	55,143		56,690
Due after ten years	208,590		236,643
Total	$	274,312	303,912

Table of Contents

Gross unrealized losses on debt securities and the estimated fair value of the related securities, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, were as follows:



	December 31, 2019
	Less than 12 months			12 months or more		Total
	Estimated fair value		Unrealized losses	Estimated fair value	Unrealized losses	Estimated fair value	Unrealized losses
	(In thousands)
Available-for-sale:
Mortgage-backed securities:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation	$	215,160	736	—	—	215,160	736
Federal National Mortgage Association	80,298		297	12,972	17	93,270	314
Government National Mortgage Association	20,078		47	—	—	20,078	47
Total debt securities available-for-sale	315,536		1,080	12,972	17	328,508	1,097
Held-to-maturity:
Debt securities:
Government-sponsored enterprises	31,696		500	—	—	31,696	500
Municipal bonds	23,596		43	—	—	23,596	43
Total debt securities held-to-maturity	55,292		543	—	—	55,292	543
Mortgage-backed securities:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation	20,860		64	11,065	65	31,925	129
Federal National Mortgage Association	7,911		52	37,316	255	45,227	307
Total mortgage-backed securities held-to-maturity	28,771		116	48,381	320	77,152	436
Total debt securities held-to-maturity	84,063		659	48,381	320	132,444	979
Total	$	399,599	1,739	61,353	337	460,952	2,076



	December 31, 2018
	Less than 12 months			12 months or more		Total
	Estimated fair value		Unrealized losses	Estimated fair value	Unrealized losses	Estimated fair value	Unrealized losses
	(In thousands)
Available-for-sale:
Mortgage-backed securities:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation	$	97,137	994	288,916	7,196	386,053	8,190
Federal National Mortgage Association	125,389		2,098	489,337	13,452	614,726	15,550
Total debt securities available-for-sale	222,526		3,092	778,253	20,648	1,000,779	23,740
Held-to-maturity:
Debt securities:
Government-sponsored enterprises	—		—	40,022	1,236	40,022	1,236
Mortgage-backed securities:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation	51,045		553	339,534	8,860	390,579	9,413
Federal National Mortgage Association	214,400		2,449	663,671	20,238	878,071	22,687
Government National Mortgage Association	35,499		492	44,824	926	80,323	1,418
Total mortgage-backed securities held-to-maturity	300,944		3,494	1,048,029	30,024	1,348,973	33,518
Total debt securities held-to-maturity	300,944		3,494	1,088,051	31,260	1,388,995	34,754
Total	$	523,470	6,586	1,866,304	51,908	2,389,774	58,494

Table of Contents

At December 31, 2019, the majority of gross unrealized losses relate to our mortgage-backed-security portfolio, which is comprised of debt securities issued by U.S. Government Sponsored Enterprises. The fair value of these securities has been positively impacted by changes in interest rates as compared to December 31, 2018. The Company has no intent to sell, nor is it more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell, the debt securities in an unrealized loss position before the recovery of its amortized cost basis or maturity.

Other-Than-Temporary Impairment (“OTTI”)

We conduct a quarterly review and evaluation of the securities portfolio to determine if the value of any security has declined below its cost or amortized cost, and whether such decline is other-than-temporary. If a determination is made that a debt security is other-than-temporarily impaired, the Company will estimate the amount of the unrealized loss that is attributable to credit and all other non-credit related factors. The credit related component will be recognized as an other-than-temporary impairment charge in non-interest income. The non-credit related component will be recorded as an adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax.

With the assistance of a valuation specialist, we evaluate the credit and performance of each issuer underlying our pooled TruPs. Cash flows for each security are forecasted using assumptions for defaults, recoveries, pre-payments and amortization. At December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 management deemed that the present value of projected cash flows for each security was greater than the book value and did not recognize any additional OTTI charges for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017. At December 31, 2019, non-credit related OTTI recorded on the previously impaired TruPs was $14.8 million ($10.6 million after-tax). This amount is being accreted into income over the estimated remaining life of the securities.

The following table presents the changes in the credit loss component of the impairment loss of debt securities that the Company has written down for such loss as an other-than-temporary impairment recognized in earnings.



	For the Years Ended December 31,
	2019			2018		2017
	(In thousands)
Balance of credit related OTTI, beginning of period	$	80,595		85,768		95,743
Additions:
Initial credit impairments	—			—		—
Subsequent credit impairments	—			—		—
Reductions:
Accretion of credit loss impairment due to an increase in expected cash flows	(3,530		)	(4,703	)	(6,164	)
Reductions for securities sold or paid off during the period	—			(470	)	(3,811	)
Balance of credit related OTTI, end of period	$	77,065		80,595		85,768

The credit loss component of the impairment loss represents the difference between the present value of expected future cash flows and the amortized cost basis of the securities prior to considering credit losses. The beginning balance represents the credit loss component for debt securities for which OTTI occurred prior to the period presented. If OTTI is recognized in earnings for credit impaired debt securities, they would be presented as additions based upon whether the current period is the first time a debt security was credit impaired (initial credit impairment) or is not the first time a debt security was credit impaired (subsequent credit impairments). The credit loss component is reduced if the Company sells, intends to sell or believes it will be required to sell previously credit impaired debt securities. Additionally, the credit loss component is reduced if (i) the Company receives cash flows in excess of what it expected to receive over the remaining life of the credit impaired debt security, (ii) the security matures or (iii) the security is fully written down.

Realized Gains and Losses

Gains and losses on the sale of all securities are determined using the specific identification method. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company received proceeds of $399.4 million on securities sold from the debt securities available-for-sale portfolio resulting in gross realized losses of $5.7 million recognized in non-interest income. Proceeds from the sale were reinvested in higher yielding debt securities. There were no sales of equity securities or debt securities held-to-maturity for the year ended December 31, 2019. The Company recognized unrealized gains on equity securities of $150,000 for the year ended December 31, 2019.

For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company received proceeds of $632.4 million on its lower yielding mortgage-backed securities sold from the debt securities available-for-sale portfolio resulting in gross realized losses of $32.8 million. Proceeds from the sale were reinvested in higher yielding debt securities. There were no sales of equity securities or debt securities held-to-

Table of Contents

maturity for the year ended December 31, 2018; however, the Company received proceeds of $7.3 million from the payoff and paydown of TruPs which resulted in $3.2 million of interest income from securities, as well as a gain of $1.2 million recognized as non-interest income. The Company recognized unrealized gains on equity securities of $2,000 for the year ended December 31, 2018.

For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company received proceeds of $102.1 million on pools of mortgage-backed securities sold from the debt securities available-for-sale portfolio resulting in gross realized gains of $1.3 million and gross realized losses of $69,000. There were no sales of equity securities or debt securities held-to-maturity for the year ended December 31, 2017; however, the Company received proceeds of $3.1 million from the liquidation of a TruP security. As a result, $1.9 million was recognized as interest income from securities.

5. Loans Receivable, Net

The detail of the loan portfolio as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 was as follows:



	December 31, 2019			December 31, 2018
	(In thousands)
Multi-family loans	$	7,813,236		8,165,187
Commercial real estate loans	4,827,848			4,783,095
Commercial and industrial loans	2,951,306			2,389,756
Construction loans	262,866			227,015
Total commercial loans	15,855,256			15,565,053
Residential mortgage loans	5,144,229			5,350,504
Consumer and other loans	699,729			707,746
Total loans excluding PCI loans	21,699,214			21,623,303
PCI loans	4,055			4,461
Deferred fees, premiums and other, net ⁽¹⁾	907			(13,811	)
Allowance for loan losses	(228,120		)	(235,817	)
Net loans	$	21,476,056		21,378,136

(1) Included in deferred fees and premiums are accretable purchase accounting adjustments in connection with loans acquired and an adjustment to the carrying amount of the residential loans hedged.

Allowance for Loan Losses

An analysis of the allowance for loan losses is summarized as follows:



	Years Ended December 31,
	2019			2018		2017
	(In thousands)
Balance at beginning of the period	$	235,817		230,969		228,373
Loans charged off	(13,132		)	(24,090	)	(19,209	)
Recoveries	6,435			16,938		5,555
Net charge-offs	(6,697		)	(7,152	)	(13,654	)
Provision for loan losses	(1,000		)	12,000		16,250
Balance at end of the period	$	228,120		235,817		230,969

The allowance for loan losses is the estimated amount considered necessary to cover credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. The allowance is established through the provision for loan losses that is charged against income. In determining the allowance for loan losses, we make significant estimates and therefore, have identified the allowance as a critical accounting policy. The methodology for determining the allowance for loan losses is considered a critical accounting policy by management because of the high degree of judgment involved, the subjectivity of the assumptions used, and the potential for changes in the economic environment that could result in changes to the amount of the recorded allowance for loan losses.

Table of Contents

The allowance for loan losses has been determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP, under which we are required to maintain an allowance for probable losses at the balance sheet date. We are responsible for the timely and periodic determination of the amount of the allowance required. We believe that our allowance for loan losses is adequate to cover specifically identifiable losses, as well as estimated losses inherent in our portfolio for which certain losses are probable but not specifically identifiable. Loans acquired are marked to fair value on the date of acquisition with no valuation allowance reflected in the allowance for loan losses. In conjunction with the quarterly evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, the Company performs an analysis on acquired loans to determine whether or not an allowance should be ascribed to those loans. PCI loans are loans acquired at a discount that is due, in part, to credit quality. PCI loans are accounted for in accordance with ASC Subtopic 310-30 and are initially recorded at fair value as determined by the present value of expected future cash flows with no valuation allowance reflected in the allowance for loan losses. For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company recorded charge-offs of $3,000 and $379,000, respectively, related to PCI loans acquired.

Management performs a quarterly evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. The analysis of the allowance for loan losses has two elements: loans collectively evaluated for impairment and loans individually evaluated for impairment. Specific allocations are made for loans determined to be impaired. A loan is deemed to be impaired if it is a commercial loan with an outstanding balance greater than $1.0 million and on non-accrual status, loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”), and other commercial loans greater than $1.0 million if management has specific information that it is probable they will not collect all amounts due under the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impairment is measured by determining the present value of expected future cash flows or, for collateral-dependent loans, the fair value of the collateral adjusted for market conditions and selling expenses.

The allowance for loans collectively evaluated for impairment consists of both quantitative and qualitative loss components. The Company determines the qualitative component by applying quantitative loss factors to the loans collectively evaluated for impairment segregated by type of loan, risk rating (if applicable) and payment history. In addition, the Company’s residential portfolio is subdivided between fixed and adjustable rate loans as adjustable rate loans are deemed to be subject to more credit risk if interest rates rise. Quantitative loss factors for each loan segment are generally determined based on the Company’s historical loss experience over a look-back period. Additionally, management assesses the loss emergence period for the expected losses of each loan segment and adjusts each quantitative loss factor accordingly. The loss emergence period is the estimated time from the date of a loss event (such as a personal bankruptcy) to the actual recognition of the loss (typically via the first full or partial loan charge-off), and is determined based upon a study of the Company’s past loss experience by loan segment. The quantitative loss factors may also be adjusted to account for qualitative factors, both internal and external to the Company, which are made to reflect risks inherent in the portfolio not captured by the quantitative component. This evaluation is based on among other things, loan and delinquency trends, general economic conditions, credit concentrations, industry trends and lending and credit management policies and procedures, but is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant revisions based upon changes in economic and real estate market conditions. Actual loan losses may be different than the allowance for loan losses we have established which could have a material negative effect on our financial results.

Our lending emphasis has been the origination of multi-family loans, commercial real estate loans, commercial and industrial loans, one- to four-family residential mortgage loans secured by one- to four-family residential real estate, construction loans and consumer loans. The majority of consumer loans are cash surrender value lending on life insurance contracts, home equity loans and home equity lines of credit. These activities resulted in a concentration of loans secured by real estate property and businesses located in New Jersey and New York. Based on the composition of our loan portfolio, we believe the primary risks to our loan portfolio are increases in interest rates, a decline in the general economy, and declines in real estate market values in New Jersey, New York and surrounding states. Any one or combination of these events may adversely affect our loan portfolio resulting in increased delinquencies, loan losses and future levels of loan loss provisions. As a substantial amount of our loan portfolio is collateralized by real estate, appraisals of the underlying value of property securing loans are critical in determining the amount of the allowance required for specific impaired loans. Assumptions for appraisal valuations are instrumental in determining the value of properties. Negative changes to appraisal assumptions could significantly impact the valuation of a property securing a loan and the related allowance determined. The assumptions supporting such appraisals are carefully reviewed to determine that the resulting values reasonably reflect amounts realizable on the related loans.

Table of Contents

The Company obtains an appraisal for all commercial loans that are collateral dependent upon origination. Updated appraisals are generally obtained for substandard loans $1.0 or greater and special mention loans $2.0 million or greater in the process of collection by the Company’s special assets department. This is done in order to determine the specific reserve or charge off needed. As part of the allowance for loan losses process, the Company reviews each collateral dependent commercial loan classified as non-accrual and/or impaired and assesses whether there has been an adverse change in the collateral value supporting the loan. The Company utilizes information from its commercial lending officers and its credit department and special assets department’s knowledge of changes in real estate conditions in our lending area to identify if possible deterioration of collateral value has occurred. Based on the severity of the changes in market conditions, management determines if an updated appraisal is warranted or if downward adjustments to the previous appraisal are warranted. If it is determined that the deterioration of the collateral value is significant enough to warrant ordering a new appraisal, an estimate of the downward adjustments to the existing appraised value is used in assessing if additional specific reserves are necessary until the updated appraisal is received.

Table of Contents

The following tables present the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio segment and based on impairment method as of the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:



	December 31, 2019
	Multi- Family Loans			Commercial Real Estate Loans		Commercial and Industrial Loans		Construction Loans		Residential Mortgage Loans		Consumer and Other Loans		Unallocated		Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance-December 31, 2018	$	82,876		48,449		71,084		7,486		20,776		3,102		2,044		235,817
Charge-offs	(2,973		)	(151	)	(6,833	)	—		(2,241	)	(934	)	—		(13,132	)
Recoveries	1,244			2,204		1,203		—		1,448		336		—		6,435
Provision	(7,048		)	423		8,942		(670	)	(2,592	)	44		(99	)	(1,000	)
Ending balance-December 31, 2019	$	74,099		50,925		74,396		6,816		17,391		2,548		1,945		228,120

Individually evaluated for impairment	$	—		—		—		—		1,686		77		—		1,763
Collectively evaluated for impairment	74,099			50,925		74,396		6,816		15,705		2,471		1,945		226,357
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	—			—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Balance at December 31, 2019	$	74,099		50,925		74,396		6,816		17,391		2,548		1,945		228,120

Loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	22,169		7,875		12,476		—		26,147		856		—		69,523
Collectively evaluated for impairment	7,791,067			4,819,973		2,938,830		262,866		5,118,082		698,873		—		21,629,691
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	—			3,499		—		—		489		67		—		4,055
Balance at December 31, 2019	$	7,813,236		4,831,347		2,951,306		262,866		5,144,718		699,796		—		21,703,269

Table of Contents



	December 31, 2018
	Multi- Family Loans			Commercial Real Estate Loans		Commercial and Industrial Loans		Construction Loans		Residential Mortgage Loans		Consumer and Other Loans		Unallocated		Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance-December 31, 2017	$	81,469		56,137		54,563		11,609		21,835		3,099		2,257		230,969
Charge-offs	(2,603		)	(7,200	)	(7,078	)	—		(5,246	)	(1,963	)	—		(24,090	)
Recoveries	17			5,213		9,478		—		2,193		37		—		16,938
Provision	3,993			(5,701	)	14,121		(4,123	)	1,994		1,929		(213	)	12,000
Ending balance-December 31, 2018	$	82,876		48,449		71,084		7,486		20,776		3,102		2,044		235,817

Individually evaluated for impairment	$	—		—		—		—		2,082		72		—		2,154
Collectively evaluated for impairment	82,876			48,449		71,084		7,486		18,694		3,030		2,044		233,663
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	—			—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Balance at December 31, 2018	$	82,876		48,449		71,084		7,486		20,776		3,102		2,044		235,817

Loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	32,046		6,623		19,624		—		27,884		570		—		86,747
Collectively evaluated for impairment	8,133,141			4,776,472		2,370,132		227,015		5,322,620		707,176		—		21,536,556
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	—			3,730		—		—		611		120		—		4,461
Balance at December 31, 2018	$	8,165,187		4,786,825		2,389,756		227,015		5,351,115		707,866		—		21,627,764

The Company categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information and current economic trends, among other factors. For non-homogeneous loans, such as commercial and commercial real estate loans the Company analyzes the loans individually by classifying the loans as to credit risk and assesses the probability of collection for each type of class. In assessing and classifying our commercial loan portfolio, the Company places significant emphasis on the borrower’s ability to service its debt. This analysis is performed on a quarterly basis. The Company uses the following definitions for risk ratings:

Pass - “Pass” assets are well protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor (or guarantors, if any) or by the fair value, less cost to acquire and sell, of any underlying collateral in a timely manner.

Watch - A “Watch” asset has all the characteristics of a Pass asset but warrants more than the normal level of supervision. These loans may require more detailed reporting to management because some aspects of underwriting may not conform to policy or adverse

Table of Contents

events may have affected or could affect the cash flow or ability to continue operating profitably, provided, however, the events do not constitute an undue credit risk. Residential and consumer loans delinquent 30-59 days are considered watch if not already identified as impaired.

Special Mention - A “Special Mention” asset has potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or in the institution’s credit position at some future date. Special Mention assets are not adversely classified and do not expose an institution to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification. Residential and consumer loans delinquent 60-89 days are considered special mention if not already identified as impaired.

Substandard - A “Substandard” asset is inadequately protected by the current worth and paying capacity of the obligor or by the collateral pledged, if any. Assets so classified must have a well-defined weakness, or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Residential and consumer loans delinquent 90 days or greater as well as those identified as impaired are considered substandard.

Doubtful - An asset classified “Doubtful” has all the weaknesses inherent in one classified substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full highly questionable and improbable on the basis of currently known facts, conditions, and values.

Loss - An asset or portion thereof, classified “Loss” is considered uncollectible and of such little value that its continuance on the institution’s books as an asset, without establishment of a specific valuation allowance or charge-off, is not warranted. This classification does not necessarily mean that an asset has no recovery or salvage value; but rather, there is much doubt about whether, how much, or when the recovery will occur. As such, it is not practical or desirable to defer the write-off.

The following tables present the risk category of loans as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 by class of loans excluding PCI loans:



	December 31, 2019
	Pass		Watch	Special Mention	Substandard	Doubtful	Loss	Total
	(In thousands)
Commercial loans:
Multi-family	$	6,326,412	942,438	167,748	376,638	—	—	7,813,236
Commercial real estate	4,023,642		489,514	118,426	196,266	—	—	4,827,848
Commercial and industrial	2,031,148		693,397	111,389	115,372	—	—	2,951,306
Construction	169,236		75,319	—	18,311	—	—	262,866
Total commercial loans	12,550,438		2,200,668	397,563	706,587	—	—	15,855,256
Residential mortgage	5,073,971		14,388	5,429	50,441	—	—	5,144,229
Consumer and other	687,266		9,157	1,174	2,132	—	—	699,729
Total	$	18,311,675	2,224,213	404,166	759,160	—	—	21,699,214



	December 31, 2018
	Pass		Watch	Special Mention	Substandard	Doubtful	Loss	Total
	(In thousands)
Commercial loans:
Multi-family	$	6,462,056	1,061,168	313,498	328,465	—	—	8,165,187
Commercial real estate	3,910,282		552,080	162,488	158,245	—	—	4,783,095
Commercial and industrial	1,647,130		571,620	53,861	117,145	—	—	2,389,756
Construction	163,503		35,774	9,200	18,538	—	—	227,015
Total commercial loans	12,182,971		2,220,642	539,047	622,393	—	—	15,565,053
Residential mortgage	5,268,234		12,082	7,712	62,476	—	—	5,350,504
Consumer and other	694,432		8,443	1,650	3,221	—	—	707,746
Total	$	18,145,637	2,241,167	548,409	688,090	—	—	21,623,303

Table of Contents

The following tables present the payment status of the recorded investment in past due loans as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 by class of loans, excluding PCI loans:



	December 31, 2019
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days	Greater than 90 Days	Total Past Due	Current	Total Loans Receivable
	(In thousands)
Commercial loans:
Multi-family	$	45,606	1,946	22,055	69,607	7,743,629	7,813,236
Commercial real estate	7,958		525	3,787	12,270	4,815,578	4,827,848
Commercial and industrial	7,774		2,767	5,053	15,594	2,935,712	2,951,306
Construction	—		—	—	—	262,866	262,866
Total commercial loans	61,338		5,238	30,895	97,471	15,757,785	15,855,256
Residential mortgage	16,954		6,195	27,628	50,777	5,093,452	5,144,229
Consumer and other	9,157		1,174	1,299	11,630	688,099	699,729
Total	$	87,449	12,607	59,822	159,878	21,539,336	21,699,214



	December 31, 2018
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days	Greater than 90 Days	Total Past Due	Current	Total Loans Receivable
	(In thousands)
Commercial loans:
Multi-family	$	23,098	2,572	33,683	59,353	8,105,834	8,165,187
Commercial real estate	5,491		3,511	2,415	11,417	4,771,678	4,783,095
Commercial and industrial	2,988		867	4,560	8,415	2,381,341	2,389,756
Construction	9,200		—	227	9,427	217,588	227,015
Total commercial loans	40,777		6,950	40,885	88,612	15,476,441	15,565,053
Residential mortgage	13,811		7,712	39,255	60,778	5,289,726	5,350,504
Consumer and other	8,524		1,650	2,830	13,004	694,742	707,746
Total	$	63,112	16,312	82,970	162,394	21,460,909	21,623,303

The following table presents non-accrual loans, excluding PCI loans, at the dates indicated:



	December 31, 2019			December 31, 2018
	# of loans	Amount		# of loans	Amount
	(Dollars in thousands)
Non-accrual:
Multi-family	8	$	23,322	15	$	33,940
Commercial real estate	22	11,945		35	12,391
Commercial and industrial	18	12,481		14	19,394
Construction	—	—		1	227
Total commercial loans	48	47,748		65	65,952
Residential mortgage and consumer	255	47,435		320	58,961
Total non-accrual loans	303	$	95,183	385	$	124,913

Table of Contents

Included in the non-accrual table above are TDR loans whose payment status is current but the Company has classified as non-accrual as the loans have not maintained their current payment status for six consecutive months under the restructured terms and therefore do not meet the criteria for accrual status. As of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, these loans are comprised of the following:



	December 31, 2019			December 31, 2018
	# of loans	Amount		# of loans	Amount
	(Dollars in thousands)
TDR with payment status current classified as non-accrual:
Commercial real estate	2	$	2,360	2	$	2,817
Commercial and industrial	—	—		2	9,762
Total commercial loans	2	2,360		4	12,579
Residential mortgage and consumer	25	4,218		26	4,006
Total TDR with payment status current classified as non-accrual	27	$	6,578	30	$	16,585

The following table presents TDR loans which were also 30-89 days delinquent and classified as non-accrual at the dates indicated:



	December 31, 2019			December 31, 2018
	# of loans	Amount		# of loans	Amount
	(Dollars in thousands)
TDR 30-89 days delinquent classified as non-accrual:
Residential mortgage and consumer	18	$	3,331	11	$	1,810
Total TDR 30-89 days delinquent classified as non-accrual	18	$	3,331	11	$	1,810

The Company has no loans past due 90 days or more delinquent that are still accruing interest.

PCI loans are excluded from non-accrual loans, as they are recorded at fair value based on the present value of expected future cash flows. As of December 31, 2019, PCI loans with a carrying value of $4.1 million included $3.9 million of which were current, $26,000 of which were 30-89 days delinquent and $132,000 of which were 90 days or more delinquent. As of December 31, 2018, PCI loans with a carrying value of $4.5 million included $4.1 million of which were current, $229,000 of which were 30-89 days delinquent and $248,000 of which were 90 days or more delinquent.

At December 31, 2019 and 2018, loans meeting the Company’s definition of an impaired loan were primarily collateral dependent loans which totaled $69.5 million and $86.7 million, respectively, with allocations of the allowance for loan losses of $1.8 million and $2.2 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, interest income received and recognized on these loans totaled $1.0 million and $904,000, respectively.

Direct finance leases are stated as the sum of remaining minimum lease payments from lessees plus estimated residual values less unearned lease income. On an annual basis, the Company reviews the lease residuals for potential impairment. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company reviewed the lease residual under its lease portfolio and recorded an impairment charge of $2.6 million on leased equipment as the fair value of the equipment decreased at a rate greater than originally projected.

Table of Contents

The following tables present loans individually evaluated for impairment by portfolio segment as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018:



	December 31, 2019
	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance	Related Allowance	Average Recorded Investment	Interest Income Recognized
	(In thousands)
With no related allowance:
Multi-family	$	22,169	23,581	—	23,298	47
Commercial real estate	7,875		10,913	—	8,127	199
Commercial and industrial	12,476		21,090	—	14,860	351
Construction	—		—	—	—	—
Total commercial loans	42,520		55,584	—	46,285	597
Residential mortgage and consumer	13,783		18,066	—	13,811	267
With an allowance recorded:
Multi-family	—		—	—	—	—
Commercial real estate	—		—	—	—	—
Commercial and industrial	—		—	—	—	—
Construction	—		—	—	—	—
Total commercial loans	—		—	—	—	—
Residential mortgage and consumer	13,220		13,881	1,763	13,321	153
Total:
Multi-family	22,169		23,581	—	23,298	47
Commercial real estate	7,875		10,913	—	8,127	199
Commercial and industrial	12,476		21,090	—	14,860	351
Construction	—		—	—	—	—
Total commercial loans	42,520		55,584	—	46,285	597
Residential mortgage and consumer	27,003		31,947	1,763	27,132	420
Total impaired loans	$	69,523	87,531	1,763	73,417	1,017

Table of Contents



	December 31, 2018
	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance	Related Allowance	Average Recorded Investment	Interest Income Recognized
	(In thousands)
With no related allowance:
Multi-family	$	32,046	34,199	—	33,656	146
Commercial real estate	6,623		11,896	—	6,611	79
Commercial and industrial	19,624		26,323	—	20,218	232
Construction	—		—	—	—	—
Total commercial loans	58,293		72,418	—	60,485	457
Residential mortgage and consumer	12,626		17,130	—	11,907	167
With an allowance recorded:
Multi-family	—		—	—	—	—
Commercial real estate	—		—	—	—	—
Commercial and industrial	—		—	—	—	—
Construction	—		—	—	—	—
Total commercial loans	—		—	—	—	—
Residential mortgage and consumer	15,828		16,498	2,154	15,627	280
Total:
Multi-family	32,046		34,199	—	33,656	146
Commercial real estate	6,623		11,896	—	6,611	79
Commercial and industrial	19,624		26,323	—	20,218	232
Construction	—		—	—	—	—
Total commercial loans	58,293		72,418	—	60,485	457
Residential mortgage and consumer	28,454		33,628	2,154	27,534	447
Total impaired loans	$	86,747	106,046	2,154	88,019	904

The average recorded investment is the annual average calculated based upon the ending quarterly balances. The interest income recognized is the year to date interest income recognized on a cash basis.

Troubled Debt Restructurings

On a case-by-case basis, the Company may agree to modify the contractual terms of a borrower’s loan to remain competitive and assist customers who may be experiencing financial difficulty, as well as preserve the Company’s position in the loan. If the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties and a concession has been made at the time of such modification, the loan is classified as a TDR.

Substantially all of our TDR loan modifications involve lowering the monthly payments on such loans through either a reduction in interest rate below a market rate, an extension of the term of the loan, or a combination of these two methods. These modifications rarely result in the forgiveness of principal or accrued interest. In addition, we frequently obtain additional collateral or guarantor support when modifying commercial loans. Restructured loans remain on non-accrual status until there has been a sustained period of repayment performance (generally six consecutive months of payments) and both principal and interest are deemed collectible.

Table of Contents

The following tables present the total TDR loans at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018. There were five residential PCI loans that were previously designated as PCI classified as TDRs at December 31, 2019 and 2018.



	December 31, 2019
	Accrual			Non-accrual			Total
	# of loans	Amount		# of loans	Amount		# of loans	Amount
	(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial loans:
Commercial real estate	—	$	—	3	$	2,362	3	$	2,362
Commercial and industrial	3	2,535		2	4,682		5	7,217
Total commercial loans	3	2,535		5	7,044		8	9,579
Residential mortgage and consumer	54	10,549		78	16,458		132	27,007
Total	57	$	13,084	83	$	23,502	140	$	36,586



	December 31, 2018
	Accrual			Non-accrual			Total
	# of loans	Amount		# of loans	Amount		# of loans	Amount
	(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial loans:
Multi-family	—	$	—	1	$	892	1	$	892
Commercial real estate	—	—		3	2,859		3	2,859
Commercial and industrial	2	2,070		4	13,479		6	15,549
Total commercial loans	2	2,070		8	17,230		10	19,300
Residential mortgage and consumer	52	11,550		79	16,908		131	28,458
Total	54	$	13,620	87	$	34,138	141	$	47,758

The following tables present information about TDRs that occurred during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:



	Years Ended December 31,
	2019					2018
	Number of Loans	Pre-modification Recorded Investment		Post- modification Recorded Investment		Number of Loans	Pre-modification Recorded Investment		Post- modification Recorded Investment
	(Dollars in thousands)
Troubled Debt Restructurings:
Commercial real estate	2	$	2,440	$	2,440	4	$	3,664	$	3,492
Commercial and industrial	2	1,270		1,270		5	14,682		14,682
Residential mortgage and consumer	14	2,850		2,850		23	4,813		4,813

Post-modification recorded investment represents the net book balance immediately following modification.

All TDRs are impaired loans, which are individually evaluated for impairment, as discussed above. Collateral dependent impaired loans classified as TDRs were written down to the estimated fair value of the collateral. There were $729,000 in charge-offs for TDRs of unsecured commercial and industrial loans during the year ended December 31, 2019. There were $214,000 of charge-offs for collateral dependent TDRs during the year ended December 31, 2018. Of the amount charged off during the year ended December 31, 2018, one borrower subsequently repaid the full amount of outstanding loan principal which resulted in a recovery of $172,000. The allowance for loan losses associated with the TDRs presented in the above tables totaled $1.8 million and $2.2 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Table of Contents

Loan modifications generally involve the reduction in loan interest rate and/or extension of loan maturity dates and also may include step up interest rates in their modified terms which will impact their weighted average yield in the future. All residential loans deemed to be TDRs were modified to reflect a reduction in interest rates to current market rates. The commercial loan modifications which qualified as TDRs in the year ended December 31, 2019 had their maturity extended and/or interest rate reduced to current market terms. The commercial loan modifications which qualified as TDRs in the year ended December 31, 2018 had their maturity extended.

The following tables present information about pre and post modification interest yield for TDRs which occurred during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:



	Years Ended December 31,
	2019					2018
	Number of Loans	Pre-modification Interest Yield		Post- modification Interest Yield		Number of Loans	Pre-modification Interest Yield		Post- modification Interest Yield


Commercial real estate	2	6.30	%	4.67	%	4	4.42	%	4.42	%
Commercial and industrial	2	5.66	%	5.66	%	5	5.96	%	5.96	%
Residential mortgage and consumer	14	5.07	%	4.96	%	23	5.10	%	4.26	%

Payment defaults for loans modified as a TDR in the previous 12 months to December 31, 2019 consisted of 2 residential loans with a recorded investment of $152,000. Payment defaults for loans modified as a TDR in the previous 12 months to December 31, 2018 consisted of 3 residential loans, 2 commercial real estate loans and 1 multi-family loan with a recorded investment of $584,000, $568,000 and $892,000, respectively, at December 31, 2018.

Loan Sales

For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company sold $147.2 million of performing commercial loans and $49.2 million of residential performing loans resulting in a gain on sale of $1.8 million. In addition, the Company sold $173,000 of non-performing commercial real estate loans resulting in $29,000 of additional charge offs recorded through the allowance. For the year ended December 31, 2018, there were no sales of loans.

The Company also sold its interest in $23.6 million of leased equipment resulting in a gain on sale of $5.7 million, which is included in other income in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the year ended December 31, 2019. There were no such sales for the year ended December 31, 2018.

6. Office Properties and Equipment, Net

Office properties and equipment are summarized as follows:



	December 31,
	2019		2018
	(In thousands)
Land	$	18,048	18,364
Office buildings	70,887		73,960
Leasehold improvements	131,129		130,803
Furniture, fixtures and equipment	108,125		105,118
Construction in process	3,192		3,786
	331,381		332,031
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization	161,767		154,599
	$	169,614	177,432

Depreciation and amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $19.6 million, $17.1 million and $17.4 million, respectively.

Table of Contents

7. Leases

The Company adopted ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” and all subsequent ASUs that modified Topic 842 on January 1, 2019. Topic 842 requires lessees to recognize a lease liability and a right-of-use asset, measured at the present value of the future minimum lease payments, at the lease commencement date. We have operating leases for corporate offices, branch locations and certain equipment. Our leases have remaining lease terms of up to 16 years, some of which include options to extend the leases for up to 10 years, and some of which include options to terminate the leases within 1 year. Certain of our operating leases for branch locations contain variable lease payments related to consumer price index adjustments.

The following table presents the balance sheet information related to our leases:



	December 31, 2019
	(Dollars in thousands)
Operating lease right-of-use assets	$	175,143
Operating lease liabilities	185,827
Weighted average remaining lease term	9.7 years
Weighted average discount rate	2.74		%

In determining the present value of lease payments, the discount rate used for each individual lease is the rate implicit in the lease, unless that rate cannot be readily determined, in which case the Company is required to use its incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date. For leases that existed at adoption, the Company used the remaining lease term as of January 1, 2019. For its incremental borrowing rate, the Company uses the borrowing rates offered to the Company by the Federal Home Loan Bank, which reflects the rates a lender would charge the Company to obtain a collateralized loan.

The following table presents the components of total lease cost recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income:



	Year Ended December 31,
	2019
	(In thousands)
Included in office occupancy and equipment expense:
Operating lease cost	$	25,245
Short-term lease cost	306
Variable lease cost	(1		)
Included in other income:
Sublease income	268

Rental expense under these leases aggregated approximately $24.4 million and $23.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

The following table presents supplemental cash flow information related to leases:



	Year Ended December 31,
	2019
	(In thousands)
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of operating lease liabilities:
Operating cash flows from operating leases	$	24,497
Operating lease liabilities arising from obtaining right-of-use assets (non-cash):
Operating leases	2,996

Table of Contents

Future minimum operating lease payments and reconciliation to operating lease liabilities at December 31, 2019:



	December 31, 2019
	(In thousands)
2020	$	24,013
2021	23,888
2022	22,270
2023	21,227
2024	21,162
Thereafter	100,662
Total lease payments	213,222
Less: Imputed interest	(27,395		)
Total operating lease liabilities	$	185,827

At December 31, 2018, the Company’s minimum operating lease payments for non-cancelable operating leases were $24.4 million, $23.8 million, $23.4 million, $21.7 million and $20.7 million for 2019 through 2023, respectively, and $119.9 million in the aggregate for all years thereafter.

8. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The following table summarizes goodwill and intangible assets at December 31, 2019 and 2018:



	December 31, 2019		December 31, 2018
	(In thousands)
Mortgage servicing rights	$	12,125	11,712
Core deposit premiums	2,530		4,050
Other	668		755
Total other intangible assets	15,323		16,517
Goodwill	82,546		82,546
Goodwill and intangible assets	$	97,869	99,063

The following table summarizes other intangible assets as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018:



	Gross Intangible Asset		Accumulated Amortization		Valuation Allowance		Net Intangible Assets
	(In thousands)
December 31, 2019
Mortgage Servicing Rights	$	19,368	(7,140	)	(103	)	12,125
Core Deposit Premiums	20,561		(18,031	)	—		2,530
Other	1,150		(482	)	—		668
Total other intangible assets	$	41,079	(25,653	)	(103	)	15,323

December 31, 2018
Mortgage Servicing Rights	$	19,808	(7,921	)	(175	)	11,712
Core Deposit Premiums	25,058		(21,008	)	—		4,050
Other	1,150		(395	)	—		755
Total other intangible assets	$	46,016	(29,324	)	(175	)	16,517

Mortgage servicing rights are accounted for using the amortization method. Under this method, the Company amortizes the loan servicing asset in proportion to, and over the period of, estimated net servicing revenues. The Company sells loans on a servicing-retained basis. Loans that were sold on this basis had an unpaid principal balance of $1.67 billion and $1.62 billion at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, all of which relate to mortgage loans. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the servicing

Table of Contents

asset, included in intangible assets, had an estimated fair value of $14.1 million and $14.9 million, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2019, fair value was based on expected future cash flows considering a weighted average discount rate of 12.05%, a weighted average constant prepayment rate on mortgages of 11.04% and a weighted average life of 6.2 years.

Core deposit premiums are amortized using an accelerated method and having a weighted average amortization period of 10 years.

The following presents the estimated future amortization expense of other intangible assets for the next five years:



	Mortgage Servicing Rights		Core Deposit Premiums		Other
	(In thousands)
2020	$	425	$	1,112	$	87
2021	442		756		67
2022	456		466		57
2023	470		195		57
2024	486		—		57

9. Deposits

Deposits are summarized as follows:



	December 31,
	2019						2018
	Weighted Average Rate		Amount		% of Total		Weighted Average Rate		Amount		% of Total
	(In thousands)
Non-interest bearing:
Checking accounts	—	%	$	2,472,232	13.84	%	—	%	$	2,535,848	14.42	%
Interest-bearing:
Checking accounts	1.36	%	5,512,979		30.87	%	1.53	%	4,783,563		27.21	%
Money market deposits	1.50	%	3,817,718		21.37	%	1.55	%	3,641,070		20.71	%
Savings	0.86	%	2,050,101		11.48	%	0.64	%	2,048,941		11.66	%
Certificates of deposit	1.67	%	4,007,308		22.44	%	1.35	%	4,570,847		26.00	%
Total Deposits	1.21	%	$	17,860,338	100.00	%	1.16	%	$	17,580,269	100.00	%

Included in the above balances for the years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 are money market deposits of $266.4 million and $311.0 million, respectively, obtained through brokers and certificates of deposit of $1.31 billion and $1.53 billion, respectively, obtained through brokers.

Scheduled maturities of certificates of deposit are as follows:



	December 31,
	2019		2018
	(In thousands)
Within one year	$	3,627,229	3,724,359
One to two years	309,934		631,928
Two to three years	42,170		148,773
Three to four years	14,435		41,953
After four years	13,540		23,834
	$	4,007,308	4,570,847

The aggregate amount of certificates of deposit in denominations of $100,000 or more totaled approximately $2.93 billion and $1.87 billion at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.

Table of Contents

Interest expense on deposits consists of the following:



	For the Years Ended December 31,
	2019		2018	2017
	(In thousands)
Checking accounts	$	84,698	62,447	37,091
Money market deposits	60,896		46,394	34,366
Savings	17,148		13,240	8,395
Certificates of deposit	99,115		66,564	33,691
Total	$	261,857	188,645	113,543

10. Borrowed Funds

Borrowed funds are summarized as follows:



	December 31,
	2019			2018
	Principal		Weighted Average Rate	Principal		Weighted Average Rate
			(Dollars in thousands)
Funds borrowed under repurchase agreements:
Other brokers	$	447,910	2.16%	$	250,000	2.67%
Other borrowed funds:
FHLB advances	4,979,201		2.06%	4,930,681		2.16%
Other	400,000		1.63%	255,000		2.60%
Total other borrowed funds:	5,379,201		2.02%	5,185,681		2.18%
Total borrowed funds	$	5,827,111	2.03%	$	5,435,681	2.20%

Borrowed funds had scheduled maturities as follows:



	December 31,
	2019			2018
	Principal		Weighted Average Rate	Principal		Weighted Average Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
Within one year	$	1,536,000	1.81%	$	1,405,130	2.24%
One to two years	525,000		1.82%	1,175,000		2.06%
Two to three years	1,199,958		2.06%	950,000		2.26%
Three to four years	1,694,526		2.20%	700,551		1.98%
Four to five years	571,627		2.10%	900,000		2.19%
After five years	300,000		2.36%	305,000		2.90%
Total borrowed funds	$	5,827,111	2.03%	$	5,435,681	2.20%

Mortgage-backed securities have been sold, subject to repurchase agreements, to the FHLB and various brokers. Mortgage-backed securities sold, subject to repurchase agreements, are held by the FHLB for the benefit of the Company. Repurchase agreements require repurchase of the identical securities. Whole mortgage loans have been pledged to the FHLB as collateral for advances, but are held by the Company.

Table of Contents

The amortized cost and fair value of the underlying securities used as collateral for borrowings are as follows:



	December 31,
	2019		2018
	(Dollars in thousands)
Amortized cost of collateral:
Mortgage-backed securities	$	480,501	280,356
Total amortized cost of collateral	$	480,501	280,356
Fair value of collateral:
Mortgage-backed securities	$	487,322	273,884
Total fair value of collateral	$	487,322	273,884

During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the maximum month-end balance of the repurchase agreements was $447.9 million, $280.0 million and $153.0 million, respectively. The average amount of repurchase agreements outstanding during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $369.0 million, $202.0 million and $149.0 million, respectively, and the average interest rate was 2.45%, 2.68% and 2.11%, respectively.

At December 31, 2019, our borrowing capacity at the FHLB was $12.45 billion, of which the Company had outstanding borrowings of $9.01 billion, which included letters of credit totaling $4.02 billion. In addition, the Bank had access to unsecured overnight borrowings (Fed Funds) with other financial institutions totaling $750.0 million, of which $400.0 million was outstanding at December 31, 2019.

In June 2019, we prepaid $200.0 million of FHLB advances and a $150.0 million repurchase agreement with a total average interest rate of 3.00% and maturity dates in 2020 and 2021. The prepaid borrowings were replaced with $200.0 million of FHLB advances and a $150.0 million repurchase agreement with a total average interest rate of 2.55% and maturity dates averaging 4 years. Included in the interest rate is a prepayment penalty of 0.47%. In August 2019, we prepaid $275.0 million of FHLB advances with a total average interest rate of 2.46% and maturity dates in 2021. The prepaid borrowings were replaced with $275.0 million of FHLB advances with a total average interest rate of 2.16% and maturity dates of 5 years. Included in the interest rate is a prepayment penalty of 0.27%. The prepayment penalties are amortized over the life of the new debt instruments in accordance with ASC 470-50, Debt - Modifications and Extinguishments.

11. Income Taxes

The components of income tax expense are as follows:



	Years Ended December 31,
	2019		2018		2017
	(In thousands)
Current tax expense:
Federal	$	32,881	34,668		47,101
State	12,743		17,661		6,736
	45,624		52,329		53,837
Deferred tax expense (benefit):
Federal	28,784		16,979		105,044
State	16,840		(1,466	)	(5,036	)
	45,624		15,513		100,008
Total income tax expense	$	91,248	67,842		153,845

Table of Contents

The following table presents the reconciliation between the actual income tax expense and the “expected” amount computed using the applicable statutory federal income tax rate of 21% for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 and 35% for the year ended December 31, 2017:



	Years Ended December 31,
	2019			2018		2017
				(In thousands)
“Expected” federal income tax expense	$	60,214		56,788		98,206
State tax, net	19,075			12,487		6,051
Impact of tax law changes	7,823			(2,284	)	49,164
Tax exempt interest	(1,519		)	(974	)	(1,094	)
Non-deductible FDIC premiums	1,229			1,636		—
Bank owned life insurance	(1,374		)	(1,242	)	(1,310	)
Excess tax deficiencies (benefits) from employee share-based payments	362			(1,073	)	(1,722	)
ESOP fair market value adjustment	529			653		1,237
Non-deductible compensation	4,538			2,187		1,451
Other	371			(336	)	1,862
Total income tax expense	$	91,248		67,842		153,845

The temporary differences and loss carryforwards which comprise the deferred tax asset and liability are as follows:



	December 31,
	2019		2018
	(In thousands)
Deferred tax asset:
Employee benefits	$	17,934	27,315
Deferred compensation	562		845
Allowance for loan losses	60,869		67,079
Net unrealized loss on debt securities available-for-sale	—		7,880
Net unrealized loss on hedging activities	11,877		—
ESOP	3,826		3,623
Fair value adjustments related to acquisitions	11,436		15,189
Charitable contribution carryforward	—		888
Loan origination costs	7,510		8,325
State NOL	815		3,604
Other	958		1,775
Gross deferred tax asset	115,787		136,523
Deferred tax liability:
Mortgage servicing rights	3,308		3,555
Premises and equipment	5,686		4,161
Net unrealized gain on debt securities available-for-sale	4,947		—
Net unrealized gain on hedging activities	—		4,946
Equipment financing	37,201		19,124
Other	425		326
Gross deferred tax liability	51,567		32,112
Net deferred tax asset	$	64,220	104,411

A deferred tax asset or liability is recognized for the estimated future tax effects attributable to temporary differences and carryforwards. The measurement of such deferred tax items is reduced by the amount that is more likely than not to be realized based on available evidence. The ultimate realization of the deferred tax asset is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences and carryforwards become deductible. A valuation allowance is

100

Table of Contents

recorded for tax benefits which management has determined are not more likely than not to be realized. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, there was no valuation allowance.

Under ASC 740, “Income Taxes”, companies are required to recognize the effect of tax law changes in the period of enactment; therefore, the Company re-measures its deferred tax assets and liabilities at the enacted tax rate expected to apply when its temporary differences are expected to be realized or settled. On July 1, 2018, New Jersey Assembly Bill 4202 was signed into law, providing significant revisions to New Jersey’s Corporation Business Tax laws. The new legislation provided for temporary increases to the corporate income tax rate for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2018, as well as mandatory combined reporting effective for tax years beginning after 2018. As of the date of enactment, the resulting impact of the re-measurement of the Company’s deferred tax balances was an increase of $2.3 million. In December 2019, a technical bulletin was issued by the State of New Jersey providing clarification on mandatory combined reporting, causing a remeasurement of the Company’s deferred tax balances. This remeasurement resulted in a decrease of $7.8 million to the deferred tax asset. On December 22, 2017, the President signed into law the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The new law reduced the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. As of the date of enactment, the resulting impact of the re-measurement of the Company’s deferred tax balances was a decrease of $49.2 million.

At December 31, 2018, a valuation allowance that was previously established for the portion of the state tax benefit related to a prior year charitable contribution was reversed due to the enactment of the New Jersey tax reform, which allowed for charitable contributions at the Company’s standalone entity level to be subtracted from the combined group’s entire net income in future years. Due to the recent clarification, the Company will not be filing as part of the combined group, and therefore the state tax effect of the $9.7 million charitable contribution was written off as of December 31, 2019.

Based upon projections of future taxable income and the ability to carry forward net operating losses indefinitely, management believes it is more likely than not the Company will realize the remaining deferred tax asset.

Retained earnings at December 31, 2019 included approximately $45.2 million for which deferred income taxes of approximately $12.4 million have not been provided. The retained earnings amount represents the base year allocation of income to bad debt deductions for tax purposes only. Base year reserves are subject to recapture if the Bank makes certain non-dividend distributions, repurchases any of its stock, pays dividends in excess of tax earnings and profits, or ceases to maintain a bank charter. Under ASC 740, this amount is treated as a permanent difference and deferred taxes are not recognized unless it appears that it will be reduced and result in taxable income in the foreseeable future. Events that would result in taxation of these reserves include failure to qualify as a bank for tax purposes or distributions in complete or partial liquidation.

The Company had no unrecognized tax benefits or related interest or penalties at December 31, 2019 and 2018.

The Company files income tax returns in the United States federal jurisdiction, New Jersey, New York and various other state jurisdictions. As of December 31, 2019, the Company is no longer subject to federal income tax examination for years prior to 2014. Investors Bank and its affiliates are currently under audit by the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance for tax years 2015 through 2017. Neither the Company nor its subsidiaries are currently under audit by any other state jurisdiction.

12. Benefit Plans

Defined Benefit Pension Plan

The Company participates in the Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan for Financial Institutions (“Pentegra DB Plan”), a tax-qualified defined-benefit pension plan. The Pentegra DB Plan’s Employer Identification Number is 13-5645888 and the Plan Number is 333. The Pentegra DB Plan operates as a multi-employer plan for accounting purposes and as a multiple-employer plan under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and the Internal Revenue Code. There are no collective bargaining agreements in place that require contributions to the Pentegra DB Plan.

The Pentegra DB Plan is a single plan under Internal Revenue Code Section 413(c) and, as a result, all of the assets stand behind all of the liabilities. Accordingly, under the Pentegra DB Plan, contributions made by a participating employer may be used to provide benefits to participants of other participating employers. As of December 31, 2016, the annual benefit provided under the Pentegra DB Plan was frozen by an amendment to the plan. Freezing the plan eliminated all future benefit accruals and each participant’s frozen accrued benefit was determined as of December 31, 2016 with no further benefits accrued subsequent to December 31, 2016.

The funded status (fair value of plan assets divided by funding target) as of July 1, 2019 and 2018 was 88.08% and 90.00%, respectively. The fair value of plan assets reflects any contributions received through June 30, 2019.

The Company’s required contribution and pension cost was $4.8 million, $3.8 million and $1.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The accrued pension liability was $686,000 and $751,000 at December 31,

101

Table of Contents

2019 and 2018, respectively. The Company’s contributions to the Pentegra DB Plan are not more than 5% of the total contributions to the Pentegra DB Plan. The Company’s expected contribution for the 2020 plan year is approximately $5.0 million.

SERPs, Directors’ Plan and Other Postretirement Benefits Plan

Effective as of the close of business of December 31, 2016, the SERP II was amended to freeze future benefit accruals subsequent to the 2016 year of service.

The SERP I compensates certain executives (as designated by the Compensation and Benefits Committee of the Board of Directors) participating in the ESOP whose contributions are limited by the Internal Revenue Code. The Company also maintains the Amended and Restated Director Retirement Plan (“Directors’ Plan”) for certain directors, which is a nonqualified, defined benefit plan. The Directors’ Plan was frozen on November 21, 2006 such that no new benefits accrued under, and no new directors were eligible to participate in the plan. The SERPs and the Directors’ Plan are unfunded and the costs of the plans are recognized over the period that services are provided.

The following table sets forth information regarding the SERP II and the Directors’ Plan:



	December 31,
	2019			2018
	(In thousands)
Change in benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation at beginning of year	$	40,224		42,901
Interest cost	1,588			1,419
Gain due to change in mortality assumption	(423		)	(100	)
Loss (gain) due to change in discount rate	4,785			(2,822	)
Loss due to demographic changes	133			122
Actuarial loss (gain)	591			(435	)
Benefits paid	(889		)	(861	)
Benefit obligation at end of year	46,009			40,224
Funded status	$	(46,009	)	(40,224	)

The unfunded pension benefits of $46.0 million and $40.2 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, are included in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss related to pension plans, on a pre-tax basis, at December 31, 2019 and 2018, are summarized in the following table.



	December 31,
	2019		2018
	(In thousands)
Net actuarial loss	$	8,083	2,997
Total amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss	$	8,083	2,997

The accumulated benefit obligation for the SERP II and the Directors’ Plan was $37.9 million and $37.2 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The measurement date for our SERP II and Directors’ Plan is December 31 for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

The weighted-average actuarial assumptions used in the plan determinations at December 31, 2019 and 2018 were as follows:



	December 31,
	2019		2018
Discount rate	2.88	%	3.99	%
Rate of compensation increase	—	%	—	%

102

Table of Contents

The components of net periodic benefit cost are as follows:



	Years Ended December 31,
	2019		2018	2017
	(In thousands)
Service cost	$	—	—	1,486
Interest cost	1,588		1,419	1,513
Amortization of:
Net loss	—		506	458
Total net periodic benefit cost	$	1,588	1,925	3,457

The following are the weighted average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost:



	Years Ended December 31,
	2019		2018		2017
Discount rate	3.99	%	3.34	%	3.80	%
Rate of compensation increase	—	%	—	%	—	%

Estimated future benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate for the next ten calendar years are as follows:



	Amount
	(In thousands)
2020	$	2,101
2021	2,744
2022	2,721
2023	2,933
2024	2,903
2025 through 2029	14,677

401(k) Plan

The Company has a 401(k) plan covering substantially all employees provided they meet the eligibility age requirement of age 21. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the Company matched 50% of the first 8% contributed by the participants to the 401(k) plan. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the 401(k) plan included no discretionary profit sharing contribution. For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the 401(k) plan included a discretionary profit sharing contribution of 1% of eligible earnings for eligible employees. The Company’s aggregate contributions to the 401(k) plan for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 were $3.6 million, $4.8 million and $4.9 million, respectively.

Employee Stock Ownership Plan

The ESOP is a tax-qualified plan designed to invest primarily in the Company’s common stock that provides employees with the opportunity to receive a funded retirement benefit from the Bank, based primarily on the value of the Company’s common stock. During the Company’s initial public stock offering in October 2005, the ESOP was authorized to purchase, and did purchase, 10,847,883 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $3.92 per share with the proceeds of a loan from the Company to the ESOP. In connection with the completion of the Company’s mutual to stock conversion on May 7, 2014, the ESOP purchased an additional 6,617,421 common shares of stock at a price of $10.00 per share with the proceeds of a loan from the Company to the ESOP. The Company refinanced the outstanding principal and interest balance of $33.9 million and borrowed an additional $66.2 million to purchase the additional shares. The outstanding loan principal balance at December 31, 2019 was $87.1 million. Shares of the Company’s common stock pledged as collateral for the loan are released from the pledge pro-rata for allocation to participants as loan payments are made.

At December 31, 2019, shares allocated to participants were 6,096,554 since the plan inception. ESOP shares that were unallocated or not yet committed to be released totaled 11,368,750 at December 31, 2019 and had a fair value of $135.5 million. ESOP compensation expense recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $5.1 million, $5.5 million and $5.8 million, respectively, representing the fair value of shares allocated or committed to be released during the year.

103

Table of Contents

The SERP I also provides supplemental benefits to certain executives as designated by the Compensation and Benefits Committee of the Board of Directors who are prevented from receiving the full benefits contemplated by ESOP’s benefit formula due to the Internal Revenue Code. During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2017, compensation expenses related to this plan amounted to $827,000 and $262,000. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the decline in our stock price resulted in a compensation benefit related to this plan of $672,000.

Equity Incentive Plan

At the annual meeting held on June 9, 2015, stockholders of the Company approved the Investors Bancorp, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (“2015 Plan”) which provides for the issuance or delivery of up to 30,881,296 shares (13,234,841 restricted stock awards and 17,646,455 stock options) of Investors Bancorp, Inc. common stock.

Restricted shares granted under the 2015 Plan vest in equal installments, over the service period generally ranging from 5 to 7 years beginning one year from the date of grant. Additionally, certain restricted shares awarded are performance vesting awards, which may or may not vest depending upon the attainment of certain corporate financial targets. The vesting of restricted stock may accelerate in accordance with the terms of the 2015 Plan. The product of the number of shares granted and the grant date closing market price of the Company’s common stock determine the fair value of restricted shares under the 2015 Plan. Management recognizes compensation expense for the fair value of restricted shares on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company granted 2,360,919 shares of restricted stock awards under the 2015 Plan.

Stock options granted under the 2015 Plan vest in equal installments, over the service period generally ranging from 5 to 7 years beginning one year from the date of grant. The vesting of stock options may accelerate in accordance with the terms of the 2015 Plan. Stock options were granted at an exercise price equal to the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the grant date based on the closing market price and have an expiration period of 10 years. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company granted 995,216 stock options under the 2015 Plan.

During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Compensation and Benefits Committee approved the issuance of 91,982 restricted stock awards and 50,000 stock options to certain officers under the 2015 Plan. During the year ended December 31, 2018, it was determined that the performance-based stock awards granted during 2015 were achieved at 70% of target based upon the performance criteria. This resulted in 70% of these performance-based stock awards being earned and converted to time-based stock awards that vest over a service period and the balance being forfeited. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Compensation and Benefits Committee approved the issuance of 440,000 restricted stock awards and 93,800 stock options to certain officers under the 2015 Plan.

The fair value of stock options granted as part of the 2015 Plan was estimated utilizing the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions for the period presented below:



	For the Year Ended December 31,
	2019⁽¹⁾			2018			2017
Weighted average expected life (in years)	4.83			6.50			6.50
Weighted average risk-free rate of return	1.86		%	2.80		%	2.05		%
Weighted average volatility	19.92		%	17.71		%	24.12		%
Dividend yield	3.96		%	2.78		%	2.45		%
Weighted average fair value of options granted	$	0.89		$	1.94		$	2.91
Total stock options granted	995,216			50,000			93,800

(1) Includes assumptions for the Replacement Award granted in 2019.

The weighted average expected life of the stock option represents the period of time that stock options are expected to be outstanding and is estimated using historical data of stock option exercises and forfeitures. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock. The Company recognizes compensation expense for the fair values of these awards, which have graded vesting, on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the awards. Upon exercise of vested options, management expects to draw on treasury stock as the source for shares.

104

Table of Contents

The following table presents the share-based compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017:



	Years Ended December 31,
	2019		2018	2017
	(Dollars in thousands)
Stock option expense	$	5,935	5,554	5,994
Restricted stock expense	14,026		12,799	14,548
Total share-based compensation expense	$	19,961	18,353	20,542

The following is a summary of the status of the Company’s restricted shares as of December 31, 2019 and changes therein during the year then ended:



	Number of Shares Awarded		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2018	3,477,747		$	12.69
Granted⁽¹⁾	2,360,919		12.42
Vested	(1,022,664	)	12.67
Forfeited⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾	(1,921,650	)	12.54
Outstanding and non-vested at December 31, 2019	2,894,352		$	12.57

(1) Reflects the impact of the shareholder litigation settlement as noted below.

(2) Excludes 19,138 shares forfeited in connection with the shareholder litigation settlement which had vested prior to December 31, 2018.

Expected future expenses relating to the non-vested restricted shares outstanding as of December 31, 2019 is $27.6 million over a weighted average period of 2.85 years.

The following is a summary of the Company’s stock option activity and related information for its option plan for the year ended December 31, 2019:



	Number of Stock Options		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2018	10,216,047		$	12.43	6.5	$	522
Granted⁽¹⁾	995,216		12.53		5.7
Exercised	(111,802	)	7.28		3.0
Forfeited⁽¹⁾	(5,182,431	)	12.53
Expired	(262,569	)	12.46
Outstanding at December 31, 2019	5,654,461		$	12.46	5.5	$	363
Exercisable at December 31, 2019	2,955,780		$	12.39	5.5	$	356

(1) Reflects the impact of the shareholder litigation settlement as noted below.

The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 were $0.89, $1.94 and $2.91 per share, respectively. Expected future expense relating to the non-vested options outstanding as of December 31, 2019 is $9.4 million over a weighted average period of 2.04 years.

Shareholder Litigation Settlement

On March 6, 2019, a Stipulation and Agreement of Compromise, Settlement and Release was filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (the “Court”) in relation to a lawsuit involving the Company and certain of its current and former directors entitled In re Investors Bancorp Inc. Stockholder Litigation, C.A. No. 12327-VCS (the “Settlement”). The Settlement resolves a lawsuit challenging the equity compensation granted on or about June 23, 2015 to persons who were then-directors of the Company.

On June 21, 2019, the Court entered an order approving the Settlement. Following the expiration of a thirty-day appeal period, the Settlement became effective. Accordingly, pursuant to the Settlement (i) all of the stock options granted to non-employee directors (excluding Brendan J. Dugan who is deceased) and stock options granted to Paul Stathoulopoulos (who was

105

Table of Contents

not a director of the Company at the time of the equity grant on or about June 23, 2015), have been surrendered; (ii) a total of 95,694 shares of the restricted stock granted to the then non-employee directors of the Company (excluding Brendan J. Dugan) and to then non-director Paul Stathoulopoulos scheduled to vest in 2020 have been surrendered; and (iii) 925,000 shares of restricted stock and 1,333,333 stock options granted to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and 740,000 shares of restricted stock and 1,066,667 stock options granted to the Company’s President have been surrendered. As a result of the Settlement, the Company recorded $2.0 million of accelerated stock compensation expense during the third quarter of 2019.

The Compensation and Benefits Committee, with the assistance of its independent legal advisor and compensation consultant, considered the issuance of equity grants to both the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and President to replace those being surrendered pursuant to the Settlement. On May 20, 2019, the Compensation and Benefits Committee authorized and approved, and recommended to the Board of Directors (the “Board”), the issuance of (i) 925,000 shares of restricted stock and 525,120 stock options to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, and (ii) 740,000 shares of restricted stock and 420,096 stock options to the Company’s President (the “Replacement Awards”). The Board, excluding both the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and President, determined that it was advisable and in the best interests of the Company to approve and issue the Replacement Awards, subject to the surrender of awards pursuant to the Settlement.

The Replacement Awards were subsequently issued to both the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and President on July 22, 2019. The Replacement Awards were issued from the 2015 Equity Incentive Plan and were accounted for as a modification of the original awards, which resulted in no incremental expense as the compensation cost of the Replacement Awards was less than the compensation cost of the original awards. The stock options have an exercise price of $12.54 per share and vested 25% on July 22, 2019 with the remaining to vest ratably over a three-year period. Approximately 59% of the restricted shares vested on July 22, 2019 with the remainder to vest on the same vesting schedule as applicable to the June 23, 2015 award.

On September 26, 2019, a related shareholder derivative action was filed in the Delaware Chancery Court. The complaint claims breach of fiduciary duty on the part of the Company’s Board of Directors in the issuance of the replacement awards to both the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and President in connection with the settlement of the case referenced above.

13. Commitments and Contingencies

The Company is a defendant in certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. Management and the Company’s legal counsel are of the opinion that the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

At December 31, 2019, the Company was obligated under various non-cancelable operating leases on buildings and land used for office space and banking purposes. These operating leases contain escalation clauses which provide for increased rental expense, based primarily on increases in real estate taxes and cost-of-living indices. See Note 7, Leases, for further details on rental commitments.

Financial Transactions with Off-Balance-Sheet Risk and Concentrations of Credit Risk

The Company is a party to transactions with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business in order to meet the financing needs of its customers. These transactions consist of commitments to extend credit. These transactions involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

At December 31, 2019, the Company had commitments to originate total commercial loans of $407.3 million. Additionally, the Company had commitments to originate residential loans of approximately $36.5 million. While we purchased residential loans from correspondent banks during 2019, we no longer purchase such loans and have no such commitment as of December 31, 2019. Unused home equity lines of credit and undisbursed business and construction lines totaled approximately $1.62 billion at December 31, 2019. No commitments are included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The Company has no exposure to credit loss if the customer does not exercise its rights to borrow under the commitment.

The Company uses the same credit policies and collateral requirements in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet loans. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to customers as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since the commitments may expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained if deemed necessary by the Company upon extension of credit is based on management’s credit evaluation of the borrower.

The Company principally grants commercial real estate loans, multi-family loans, commercial and industrial loans, construction loans, residential mortgage loans and consumer and other loans to borrowers throughout New Jersey, New York,

106

Table of Contents

Pennsylvania and states in close proximity. Its borrowers’ abilities to repay their obligations are dependent upon various factors, including the borrowers’ income and net worth, cash flows generated by the underlying collateral or from business operations, value of the underlying collateral and priority of the Company’s lien on the property. Such factors are dependent upon various economic conditions and individual circumstances beyond the Company’s control; the Company is, therefore, subject to risk of loss. The Company believes its lending policies and procedures adequately minimize the potential exposure to such risks and adequate provisions for loan losses are provided for all probable and estimable losses.

Our portfolio contains interest-only and no income verification mortgage loans. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, interest-only residential and consumer loans totaled $28.3 million and $43.7 million, respectively, which represented less than 1% of the residential and consumer portfolio. We no longer originate residential mortgage loans without verifying income. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, these loans totaled $143.1 million and $172.4 million. From time to time and for competitive purposes, we originate interest-only commercial real estate and multi-family loans. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, these loans totaled $1.23 billion and $1.19 billion, respectively. As part of its underwriting, these loans are evaluated as fully amortizing for risk classification purposes, with the interest-only period ranging from one to ten years. In addition, the Company evaluates its policy limits on a regular basis. We believe these criteria adequately control the potential risks of such loans and that adequate provisions for loan losses are provided for all known and inherent risks.

In the normal course of business the Company sells residential mortgage loans to third parties. These loan sales are subject to customary representations and warranties. In the event that the Company is found to be in breach of these representations and warranties, it may be obligated to repurchase certain of these loans.

The Company has entered into derivative financial instruments to manage exposures that arise from business activities that result in the receipt or payment of future known and uncertain cash amounts, the value of which are determined by interest rates. The Company’s derivative financial instruments are used to manage differences in the amount, timing, and duration of the Company’s known or expected cash receipts and its known or expected cash payments principally related to the Company’s borrowings and loans. During the year ended December 31, 2019, such derivatives were used (i) to hedge the variability in cash flows associated with borrowings and (ii) to hedge changes in the fair value of certain pools of prepayable fixed-rate assets. These derivatives had an aggregate notional amount of $2.68 billion as of December 31, 2019. The fair value of derivatives designated as hedging activities as of December 31, 2019 was an asset of $559,000, inclusive of accrued interest and variation margin posted in accordance with the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. The Company has also entered into derivatives not designated as hedging activities resulting from participations in interest rate swaps provided to external lenders as part of loan participation arrangements and interest rate risk management services to commercial customers utilizing interest rate swaps. The fair value of the derivatives resulting from participations in interest rate swaps provided to lenders was a liability of $125,000 as of December 31, 2019. The fair value of the derivatives resulting from customer interest rate risk management services was an asset of $5.4 million as of December 31, 2019.

In connection with its mortgage banking activities, the Company has certain freestanding derivative instruments. At December 31, 2019, the Company had commitments of approximately $62.6 million to fund loans which will be classified as held-for-sale with a like amount of commitments to sell such loans which are considered derivative instruments under ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.” The Company also had commitments of $43.9 million to sell loans at December 31, 2019. The fair values of these derivative instruments are immaterial to the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The guarantees generally extend for a term of up to one year and are fully collateralized. For each guarantee issued, if the customer defaults on a payment or performance to the third party, the Company would have to perform under the guarantee. Outstanding standby letters of credit totaled $30.8 million at December 31, 2019. The fair values of these obligations were immaterial at December 31, 2019. At December 31, 2019, the Company had no commercial letters of credit outstanding.

Other Commitments

14. Derivatives and Hedging Activities

The Company is exposed to certain risk arising from both its business operations and economic conditions. The Company principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of business and operational risks through management of its core business activities. The Company manages economic risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk primarily by managing the amount, sources, and duration of its assets and liabilities and the use of derivative financial instruments. Specifically, the Company

107

Table of Contents

enters into derivative financial instruments to manage exposures that arise from business activities that result in the receipt or payment of future known and uncertain cash amounts, the value of which are determined by interest rates. The Company’s derivative financial instruments are used to manage differences in the amount, timing, and duration of the Company’s known or expected cash receipts and its known or expected cash payments principally related to the Company’s floating rate borrowings and pools of fixed-rate assets.

Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk

The Company’s objectives in using interest rate derivatives are primarily to reduce cost and add stability to interest expense in an effort to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of amounts subject to variability caused by changes in interest rates from a counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount. Changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges are initially recorded in other comprehensive income and are subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. Such derivatives were used to hedge the variability in cash flows associated with borrowings.

Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on the Company’s variable-rate borrowings. During the next twelve months, the Company estimates that an additional $10.2 million will be reclassified as an increase to interest expense.

Fair Value Hedges of Interest Rate Risk

The Company is exposed to changes in the fair value of certain of its fixed- and adjustable-rate assets due to changes in benchmark interest rates. The Company uses interest rate swaps to manage its exposure to changes in fair value on these instruments attributable to changes in the designated benchmark interest rate. Interest rate swaps designated as fair value hedges involve the payment of fixed-rate amounts to a counterparty in exchange for the Company receiving variable-rate payments over the life of the agreements without the exchange of the underlying notional amount. Such derivatives were used to hedge the changes in fair value of certain of its pools of prepayable fixed- and adjustable-rate assets.

For derivatives designated and that qualify as fair value hedges, the gain or loss on the derivative as well as the offsetting loss or gain on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk are recognized in interest income.

The Company terminated three interest rate swaps with an aggregate notional amount of $1.00 billion during the year ended December 31, 2019. The terminated swaps were due to mature in February 2020.

Derivatives Not Designated as Hedges

The Company has credit derivatives resulting from participations in interest rate swaps provided to external lenders as part of loan participation arrangements which are, therefore, not used to manage interest rate risk in the Company’s assets or liabilities. Additionally, the Company provides interest rate risk management services to commercial customers, primarily interest rate swaps. The Company’s market risk from unfavorable movements in interest rates related to these derivative contracts is economically hedged by concurrently entering into offsetting derivative contracts that have identical notional values, terms and indices.

Derivatives not designated as hedges are not speculative and result from a service the Company provides to certain lenders which participate in loans and commercial customers.

108

Table of Contents

Fair Values of Derivative Instruments on the Balance Sheet



			Asset Derivatives										Liability Derivatives
	At December 31, 2019					At December 31, 2018					At December 31, 2019					At December 31, 2018
	Notional amount		Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value		Notional amount		Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value		Notional amount		Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value		Notional amount		Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value
	(In millions)			(In thousands)		(In millions)			(In thousands)		(In millions)			(In thousands)		(In millions)			(In thousands)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Interest Rate Swaps	$	2,675	Other assets	$	559	$	—	Other assets	$	—	$	—	Other liabilities	$	—	$	2,605	Other liabilities	$	432
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments				$	559				$	—				$	—				$	432

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Interest Rate Swaps	$	652	Other assets	$	5,430	$	—	Other assets	$	—	$	—	Other liabilities	$	—	$	—	Other liabilities	$	—
Other Contracts	—		Other assets	—		—		Other assets	—		22		Other liabilities	125		18		Other liabilities	66
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments				$	5,430				$	—				$	125				$	66

The Chicago Mercantile Exchange (“CME”) legally characterizes the variation margin posted between counterparties as settlements of the outstanding derivative contracts instead of cash collateral.

Effect of Derivative Instruments on Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The following table presents the effect of the Company’s derivative financial instruments on the Accumulated Comprehensive Income (Loss) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018.



	Years Ended December 31,
	2019			2018
	(In thousands)
Cash Flow Hedges - Interest rate swaps
Amount of (loss) gain recognized in other comprehensive income (loss)	$	(56,448	)	$	893
Amount of gain reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to interest expense	3,399			2,056

109

Table of Contents

Location and Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Fair Value and Cash Flow Hedging Relationships

The following table presents the effect of the Company’s derivative financial instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Income as of December 31, 2019 and 2018.



		Years Ended December 31,
		2019			2018
The effects of fair value and cash flow hedging:	Income statement location	(In thousands)
Gain or (loss) on fair value hedging relationships in Subtopic 815-20
Interest contracts
Hedged items	Interest income on loans	$	6,287		$	294
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments ^[1]	Interest income on loans	(6,712		)	(366		)
Gain or (loss) on cash flow hedging relationships in Subtopic 815-20
Interest contracts
Amount of gain reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	Interest expense on borrowings	3,399			2,056
Amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as a result that a forecasted transaction is no longer probable of occurring	Interest expense on borrowings	—			—
Total amounts of income and expense line items presented in the income statement in which the effects of fair value are recorded		$	2,974		$	1,984

^[1] The amount includes gains on both active fair value hedging relationships and relationships which have been terminated.

As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the following amounts were recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets related to cumulative basis adjustment for fair value hedges:



	Carrying Amount of the Hedged Assets/(Liabilities)				Cumulative Amount of Fair Value Hedging Adjustment Included in the Carrying Amount of the Hedged Assets/(Liabilities)
Balance sheet location	December 31, 2019		December 31, 2018		December 31, 2019		December 31, 2018
	(In thousands)
Loans receivable, net ⁽¹⁾	$	478,120	$	1,005,294	$	6,426	$	294

(1) At December 31, 2019, the amortized cost basis of the closed portfolios used in these hedging relationships was $1.41 billion; the cumulative basis adjustments associated with these hedging relationships was $6.4 million; and the amounts of the designated hedged items were $478.1 million.

(2) The balance of Cumulative Amount of Fair Value Hedging Adjustment included in the Carrying Amount of the Hedged Assets/(Liabilities) as of December 31, 2019 includes $3.3 million of hedging adjustment on discontinued hedging relationships.

Location and Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments

The table below presents the effect of the Company’s derivative financial instruments that are not designated as hedging instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Income as of December 31, 2019:



	Consolidated Statements of Income location	Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative
		Years Ended December 31,
		2019			2018
		(In thousands)
Other Contracts	Other income / (expense)	$	(5	)	211
Total		$	(5	)	211

110

Table of Contents

Offsetting Derivatives

The following table presents a gross presentation, the effects of offsetting, and a net presentation of the Company’s derivatives in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018. The net amounts of derivative liabilities and assets can be reconciled to the tabular disclosure of the fair value hierarchy, see Note 15, Fair Value Measurements. The tabular disclosure of fair value provides the location that derivative assets and liabilities are presented on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.



							Gross Amounts Not Offset
	Gross Amounts Recognized		Gross Amounts Offset		Net Amounts Presented		Financial Instruments		Cash Collateral Posted		Net Amount
	(In thousands)
December 31, 2019
Assets:
Derivative contracts	$	821	$	—	$	821	$	—	$	—	$	821
Liabilities:
Derivative contracts	$	125	$	—	$	125	$	—	$	—	$	125

December 31, 2018
Liabilities:
Derivative contracts	$	498	$	—	$	498	$	—	$	—	$	498

15. Fair Value Measurements

We use fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. Our debt securities available-for-sale and derivatives are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time to time, we may be required to record at fair value other assets or liabilities on a non-recurring basis, such as held-to-maturity debt securities, mortgage servicing rights (“MSR”), loans receivable and other real estate owned. These non-recurring fair value adjustments involve the application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write-downs of individual assets. Additionally, in connection with our mortgage banking activities we have commitments to fund loans held-for-sale and commitments to sell loans, which are considered free-standing derivative instruments, the fair values of which are not material to our financial condition or results of operations.

In accordance with FASB ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, we group our assets and liabilities at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels are:


•	Level 1 – Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.


•	Level 2 – Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.

•

Level 3 – Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use significant assumptions not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect our own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques include the use of option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques. The results cannot be determined with precision and may not be realized in an actual sale or immediate settlement of the asset or liability.

We base our fair values on the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820 requires us to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.

111

Table of Contents

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

Equity securities

Our equity securities portfolio is carried at estimated fair value on a recurring basis, with any unrealized gains and losses recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The fair values of equity securities are based on quoted market prices (Level 1).

Debt securities available-for-sale

Our debt securities available-for-sale portfolio is carried at estimated fair value on a recurring basis, with any unrealized gains and losses, net of taxes, reported as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders’ equity. The fair values of debt securities available-for-sale are based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets (Level 2). The pricing service may use quoted market prices of comparable instruments or discounted cash flow analyses, incorporating inputs that are currently observable in the markets for similar securities. Inputs that are often used in the valuation methodologies include, but are not limited to, benchmark yields, credit spreads, default rates, prepayment speeds and non-binding broker quotes. As the Company is responsible for the determination of fair value, it performs quarterly analyses on the prices received from the pricing service to determine whether the prices are reasonable estimates of fair value. Specifically, the Company compares the prices received from the pricing service to a secondary pricing source. Additionally, the Company compares changes in the reported market values and returns to relevant market indices to test the reasonableness of the reported prices. The Company’s internal price verification procedures and review of fair value methodology documentation provided by independent pricing services has not historically resulted in adjustment in the prices obtained from the pricing service.

Derivatives

Derivatives are reported at fair value utilizing Level 2 inputs. The fair values of interest rate swap and risk participation agreements are based on a valuation model that uses primarily observable inputs, such as benchmark yield curves and interest rate spreads.

The following tables provide the level of valuation assumptions used to determine the carrying value of our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018.



	Carrying Value at December 31, 2019
	Total		Level 1	Level 2	Level 3
Assets:	(In thousands)
Equity securities	$	6,039	6,039	—	—
Debt securities available for sale:
Mortgage-backed securities:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation	1,240,379		—	1,240,379	—
Federal National Mortgage Association	1,178,049		—	1,178,049	—
Government National Mortgage Association	276,962		—	276,962	—
Total debt securities available-for-sale	$	2,695,390	—	2,695,390	—
Interest rate swaps	$	5,989	—	5,989	—
Liabilities:
Derivatives:
Other contracts	125		—	125	—
Total derivatives	$	125	—	125	—

112

Table of Contents



	Carrying Value at December 31, 2018
	Total		Level 1	Level 2	Level 3
Assets:	(In thousands)
Equity securities	$	5,793	5,793	—	—
Debt securities available for sale:
Mortgage-backed securities:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation	$	986,650	—	986,650	—
Federal National Mortgage Association	968,556		—	968,556	—
Government National Mortgage Association	166,956		—	166,956	—
Total debt securities available-for-sale	$	2,122,162	—	2,122,162	—
Liabilities:
Derivatives:
Interest rate swaps	$	432	—	432	—
Other contracts	66		—	66	—
Total derivatives	$	498	—	498	—

There have been no changes in the methodologies used at December 31, 2019 from December 31, 2018, and there were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during the year ended December 31, 2019.

There were no Level 3 assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis

Mortgage Servicing Rights, Net

Mortgage servicing rights are carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair value. The estimated fair value of MSR is obtained through independent third party valuations through an analysis of future cash flows, incorporating assumptions market participants would use in determining fair value including market discount rates, prepayment speeds, servicing income, servicing costs, default rates and other market driven data, including the market’s perception of future interest rate movements. The prepayment speed and the discount rate are considered two of the most significant inputs in the model. At December 31, 2019, the fair value model used prepayment speeds ranging from 6.60% to 29.10% and a discount rate of 12.05% for the valuation of the mortgage servicing rights. At December 31, 2018, the fair value model used prepayment speeds ranging from 4.98% to 27.30% and a discount rate of 12.50% for the valuation of the mortgage servicing rights. A significant degree of judgment is involved in valuing the mortgage servicing rights using Level 3 inputs. The use of different assumptions could have a significant positive or negative effect on the fair value estimate.

Impaired Loans Receivable

Loans which meet certain criteria are individually evaluated for impairment. A loan is deemed to be impaired if it is a commercial loan with an outstanding balance greater than $1.0 million and on non-accrual status, loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring, and other commercial loans with $1.0 million in outstanding principal if management has specific information that it is probable they will not collect all amounts due under the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Our impaired loans are generally collateral dependent and, as such, are carried at the estimated fair value of the collateral less estimated selling costs. Estimated fair value is calculated using an independent third-party appraiser for collateral-dependent loans. In the event the most recent appraisal does not reflect the current market conditions due to the passage of time and other factors, management will obtain an updated appraisal or make downward adjustments to the existing appraised value based on their knowledge of the property, local real estate market conditions, recent real estate transactions, and for estimated selling costs, if applicable. Appraisals were generally discounted in a range of 0% to 25%. For non collateral-dependent loans, management estimates the fair value using discounted cash flows based on inputs that are largely unobservable and instead reflect management’s own estimates of the assumptions as a market participant would in pricing such loans.

Other Real Estate Owned and Other Repossessed Assets

Other Real Estate Owned and Other Repossessed Assets are recorded at estimated fair value, less estimated selling costs when acquired, thus establishing a new cost basis. Fair value of foreclosed real estate property is generally based on independent appraisals. These appraisals include adjustments to comparable assets based on the appraisers’ market knowledge and experience, and are discounted an additional 0% to 25% for estimated costs to sell. When an asset is acquired, the excess of the loan balance

113

Table of Contents

over fair value, less estimated selling costs, is charged to the allowance for loan losses. If further declines in the estimated fair value of the asset occur, a writedown is recorded through expense. The valuation of foreclosed and repossessed assets is subjective in nature and may be adjusted in the future because of changes in economic conditions. Operating costs after acquisition are generally expensed.

Loans Held For Sale

Residential mortgage loans held for sale are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value and are therefore measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis. When available, the Company uses observable secondary market data, including pricing on recent closed market transactions for loans with similar characteristics.

The following tables provide the level of valuation assumptions used to determine the carrying value of our assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018. For the three months ended December 31, 2019 there was no change to the carrying value of impaired loans or loans held for sale. For the three months ended December 31, 2018, there was no change to the carrying value of MSR or loans held for sale.



Security Type	Valuation Technique	Unobservable Input	Range		Weighted Average Input	Carrying Value at December 31, 2019
			Minimum	Maximum		Total		Level 1	Level 2	Level 3
						(In thousands)
MSR, net	Estimated cash flow	Prepayment speeds	6.6%	29.1%	11.04%	$	10,409	—	—	10,409
Other real estate owned	Market comparable	Lack of marketability	0.0%	25.0%	2.70%	262		—	—	262
						$	10,671	—	—	10,671



Security Type	Valuation Technique	Unobservable Input	Range		Weighted Average Input	Carrying Value at December 31, 2018
			Minimum	Maximum		Total		Level 1	Level 2	Level 3
						(In thousands)
Impaired loans	Market comparable and estimated cash flow	Lack of marketability and probability of default	1.0%	83.0%	11.20%	$	15,148	—	—	15,148
Other real estate owned	Market comparable	Lack of marketability	0.0%	25.0%	10.50%	241		—	—	241
						$	15,389	—	—	15,389

Other Fair Value Disclosures

Fair value estimates, methods and assumptions for the Company’s financial instruments not recorded at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis are set forth below.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For cash and due from banks, the carrying amount approximates fair value.

Debt Securities Held-to-Maturity

Our debt securities held-to-maturity portfolio, consisting primarily of mortgage backed securities and other debt securities for which we have a positive intent and ability to hold to maturity, is carried at amortized cost. Management utilizes various inputs to determine the fair value of the portfolio. The Company obtains one price for each security primarily from a third-party pricing service, which generally uses quoted or other observable inputs for the determination of fair value. The pricing service normally derives the security prices through recently reported trades for identical or similar securities, making adjustments through the reporting date based upon available observable market information. For securities not actively traded, the pricing service may use quoted market prices of comparable instruments or discounted cash flow analyses, incorporating inputs that are currently observable in the markets for similar securities. Inputs that are often used in the valuation methodologies include, but are not limited to,

114

Table of Contents

benchmark yields, credit spreads, default rates, prepayment speeds and non-binding broker quotes. In the absence of quoted prices and in an illiquid market, valuation techniques, which require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable, are used to determine fair value of the investment. Valuation techniques are based on various assumptions, including, but not limited to forecasted cash flows, discount rates, rate of return, adjustments for nonperformance and liquidity, and liquidation values. As the Company is responsible for the determination of fair value, it performs quarterly analyses on the prices received from the pricing service to determine whether the prices are reasonable estimates of fair value. Specifically, the Company compares the prices received from the pricing service to a secondary pricing source. Additionally, the Company compares changes in the reported market values and returns to relevant market indices to test the reasonableness of the reported prices. The Company’s internal price verification procedures and review of fair value methodology documentation provided by independent pricing services has not historically resulted in adjustment in the prices obtained from the pricing service.

FHLB Stock

The fair value of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York (“FHLB”) stock is its carrying value, since this is the amount for which it could be redeemed. There is no active market for this stock and the Bank is required to hold a minimum investment based upon the balance of mortgage related assets held by the member and or FHLB advances outstanding.

Loans

Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by type such as residential mortgage and consumer. Each loan category is further segmented into fixed and adjustable rate interest terms and by performing and non-performing categories.

The fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time based on relevant market information. They do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale a particular financial instrument. Fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, risk characteristics and economic conditions. These estimates are subjective, involve uncertainties, and cannot be determined with precision.

Deposit Liabilities

The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as savings, checking accounts and money market accounts, is equal to the amount payable on demand. The fair value of certificates of deposit is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate is estimated using the rates which approximate currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.

Borrowings

The fair value of borrowings are based on securities dealers’ estimated fair values, when available, or estimated using discounted contractual cash flows using rates which approximate the rates offered for borrowings of similar remaining maturities.

115

Table of Contents

Commitments to Extend Credit

The fair value of commitments to extend credit is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties. For commitments to originate fixed rate loans, fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates. Due to the short-term nature of our outstanding commitments, the fair values of these commitments are immaterial to our financial condition.

The carrying values and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments are presented in the following table.



	December 31, 2019
	Carrying		Estimated Fair Value
	value		Total	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3
	(In thousands)
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	174,915	174,915	174,915	—	—
Equities	6,039		6,039	6,039	—	—
Debt securities available-for-sale	2,695,390		2,695,390	—	2,695,390	—
Debt securities held-to-maturity	1,148,815		1,190,104	—	1,116,771	73,333
FHLB stock	267,219		267,219	267,219	—	—
Loans held for sale	29,797		29,797	—	29,797	—
Net loans	21,476,056		21,563,627	—	—	21,563,627
Derivative financial instruments	5,989		5,989	—	5,989	—
Financial liabilities:
Deposits, other than time deposits	$	13,853,030	13,853,030	13,853,030	—	—
Time deposits	4,007,308		4,007,342	—	4,007,342	—
Borrowed funds	5,827,111		5,834,895	—	5,834,895	—
Derivative financial instruments	125		125	—	125	—



	December 31, 2018
	Carrying		Estimated Fair Value
	value		Total	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3
	(In thousands)
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	196,891	196,891	196,891	—	—
Equities	5,793		5,793	5,793	—	—
Debt securities available-for-sale	2,122,162		2,122,162	—	2,122,162	—
Debt securities held-to-maturity	1,555,137		1,558,564	—	1,476,565	81,999
FHLB stock	260,234		260,234	260,234	—	—
Loans held for sale	4,074		4,074	—	4,074	—
Net loans	21,378,136		21,085,185	—	—	21,085,185
Financial liabilities:
Deposits, other than time deposits	$	13,009,422	13,009,422	13,009,422	—	—
Time deposits	4,570,847		4,546,991	—	4,546,991	—
Borrowed funds	5,435,681		5,398,553	—	5,398,553	—
Derivative financial instruments	498		498	—	498	—

Limitations

Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one

116

Table of Contents

time the Company’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Because no market exists for a portion of the Company’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.

Fair value estimates are based on existing on- and off-balance-sheet financial instruments without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments. Significant assets that are not considered financial assets include deferred tax assets, premises and equipment and bank owned life insurance. Liabilities for pension and other postretirement benefits are not considered financial liabilities. In addition, the tax ramifications related to the realization of the unrealized gains and losses can have a significant effect on fair value estimates and have not been considered in the estimates.

16. Regulatory Capital

The Bank and the Company are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank and the Company must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Bank and the Company to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of Tier 1 leverage ratio, Common equity tier 1 risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based capital and Total risk-based capital (as defined in the regulations). In July 2013, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the other federal bank regulatory agencies issued a final rule that revised their leverage and risk-based capital requirements and the method for calculating risk-weighted assets to make them consistent with agreements that were reached by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. The Final Capital Rules also revised the quantity and quality of required minimum risk-based and leverage capital requirements, consistent with the Reform Act and the Third Basel Accord adopted by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, or Basel III capital standards. The Common equity tier 1 risk-based ratio and changes to the calculation of risk-weighted assets became effective for the Bank and Company on January 1, 2015. The required minimum Conservation Buffer commenced on January 1, 2016 at 0.625% and increased in annual increments to 2.5% on January 1, 2019. The rules impose restrictions on capital distributions and certain discretionary cash bonus payments if the minimum Conservation Buffer is not met. As of December 31, 2019, the Company and the Bank met the currently applicable Conservation Buffer of 2.5%.

As of December 31, 2019, the most recent notification from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, the Bank and the Company must maintain minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio, Common equity tier 1 risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based capital and Total risk-based capital as set forth in the tables. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the Bank and the Company’s category.

117

Table of Contents

The following is a summary of the Bank and the Company’s actual capital amounts and ratios as of December 31, 2019 compared to the FDIC minimum capital adequacy requirements and the FDIC requirements for classification as a well-capitalized institution.



	Actual				Minimum Capital Requirement with Conservation Buffer				To be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions ⁽²⁾
	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio
	(Dollars in thousands)
As of December 31, 2019 ⁽¹⁾
Bank:
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio	$	2,197,188	8.22	%	$	1,069,276	4.000	%	$	1,336,595	5.00	%
Common equity tier 1 risk-based	2,197,188		11.03	%	1,394,527		7.000	%	1,294,918		6.50	%
Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital	2,197,188		11.03	%	1,693,355		8.500	%	1,593,746		8.00	%
Total Risk-Based Capital	2,426,233		12.18	%	2,091,791		10.500	%	1,992,182		10.00	%

Investors Bancorp, Inc:
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio	$	2,553,447	9.53	%	$	1,072,095	4.000	%	n/a		n/a
Common equity tier 1 risk-based	2,553,447		12.78	%	1,399,008		7.000	%	n/a		n/a
Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital	2,553,447		12.78	%	1,698,795		8.500	%	n/a		n/a
Total Risk-Based Capital	2,782,493		13.92	%	2,098,512		10.500	%	n/a		n/a



	Actual				Minimum Capital Requirement with Conservation Buffer				To be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions ⁽²⁾
	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio
	(Dollars in thousands)
As of December 31, 2018 ⁽¹⁾
Bank:
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio	$	2,660,183	10.28	%	$	1,034,893	4.000	%	$	1,293,616	5.00	%
Common equity tier 1 risk-based	2,660,183		13.41	%	1,264,973		6.375	%	1,289,776		6.50	%
Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital	2,660,183		13.41	%	1,562,613		7.875	%	1,587,417		8.00	%
Total Risk-Based Capital	2,896,998		14.60	%	1,959,467		9.875	%	1,984,271		10.00	%

Investors Bancorp, Inc:
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio	$	2,925,743	11.29	%	$	1,036,821	4.000	%	n/a		n/a
Common equity tier 1 risk-based	2,925,743		14.71	%	1,267,950		6.375	%	n/a		n/a
Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital	2,925,743		14.71	%	1,566,291		7.875	%	n/a		n/a
Total Risk-Based Capital	3,162,558		15.90	%	1,964,080		9.875	%	n/a		n/a

(1) For purposes of calculating Tier 1 leverage ratio, assets are based on adjusted total average assets. In calculating Tier 1 risk-based capital and Total risk-based capital, assets are based on total risk-weighted assets.

(2) Prompt corrective action provisions do not apply to the bank holding company.

118

Table of Contents

17. Parent Company Only Financial Statements

The following condensed financial statements for Investors Bancorp, Inc. (parent company only) reflect the investment in its wholly-owned subsidiary, Investors Bank, using the equity method of accounting.

Balance Sheets



	December 31,
	2019		2018
	(In thousands)
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	209,879	145,570
Equity securities	1,033		1,033
Debt securities held-to-maturity (estimated fair value of $25,362 and $5,034 at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively)	25,000		5,000
Investment in subsidiary	2,265,690		2,739,770
ESOP loan receivable	87,148		88,885
Other assets	37,973		38,604
Total Assets	$	2,626,723	3,018,862
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:
Total liabilities	$	4,773	13,531
Total stockholders’ equity	2,621,950		3,005,331
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	$	2,626,723	3,018,862

Statements of Operations



	Year Ended December 31,
	2019			2018		2017
	(In thousands)
Income:
Interest on ESOP loan receivable	$	4,889		4,086		3,481
Dividend from subsidiary	675,000			289,200		131,400
Interest on deposit with subsidiary	2			2		2
Interest and dividends on investments	424			256		277
Gain on securities, net	—			130		—
Other income	12			11		2
	680,327			293,685		135,162
Expenses:
Interest expense	193			193		144
Other expenses	2,265			2,671		2,578
Income before income tax expense	677,869			290,821		132,440
Income tax expense	1,457			43		276
Income before undistributed earnings of subsidiary	676,412			290,778		132,164
(Dividend in excess of earnings) equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary	(480,928		)	(88,202	)	(5,420	)
Net income	$	195,484		202,576		126,744

119

Table of Contents

Other Comprehensive Income



	Year Ended December 31,
	2019		2018	2017
	(In thousands)
Net income	$	195,484	202,576	126,744
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Unrealized gain on securities	—		—	534
Total other comprehensive income	—		—	534
Total comprehensive income	$	195,484	202,576	127,278

Statements of Cash Flows



	Year Ended December 31,
	2019			2018		2017
	(In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	195,484		202,576		126,744
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Dividend in excess of earnings (equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary)	480,928			88,202		5,420
Gain on securities transactions, net	—			(130	)	—
Decrease in other assets	11,362			19,409		14,678
(Decrease) Increase in other liabilities	(2,906		)	4,374		1,346
Net cash provided by operating activities	684,868			314,431		148,188
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of debt securities held-to-maturity	(20,000		)	—		—
Proceeds from principal repayments on equity securities	—			—		1,000
Principal collected on ESOP loan	1,737			1,909		2,045
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities	(18,263		)	1,909		3,045
Cash flows from financing activities:
Loan to ESOP	(5,000		)	—		—
Purchase of treasury stock	(475,946		)	(258,175	)	(59,090	)
Exercise of stock options	813			5,743		9,141
Dividends paid	(122,163		)	(113,186	)	(101,550	)
Net cash used in financing activities	(602,296		)	(365,618	)	(151,499	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	64,309			(49,278	)	(266	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year	145,570			194,848		195,114
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	209,879		145,570		194,848

120

Table of Contents

18. Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

The following tables are a summary of certain quarterly financial data for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.



	2019 Quarter Ended
	March 31		June 30		September 30		December 31
	(In thousands, except per share data)
Interest and dividend income	$	256,217	259,068		264,554		260,380
Interest expense	93,539		99,900		100,102		91,605
Net interest income	162,678		159,168		164,452		168,775
Provision for loan losses	3,000		(3,000	)	(2,500	)	1,500
Net interest income after provision for loan losses	159,678		162,168		166,952		167,275
Non-interest income	11,194		6,981		14,780		20,458
Non-interest expenses	103,409		103,804		108,718		106,823
Income before income tax expense	67,463		65,345		73,014		80,910
Income tax expense	19,305		18,721		21,042		32,180
Net income	$	48,158	46,624		51,972		48,730
Basic earnings per common share	$	0.18	0.18		0.20		0.19
Diluted earnings per common share	$	0.18	0.18		0.20		0.19



	2018 Quarter Ended
	March 31		June 30	September 30	December 31
	(In thousands, except per share data)
Interest and dividend income	$	231,567	238,402	244,026	254,421
Interest expense	59,083		67,101	77,100	85,115
Net interest income	172,484		171,301	166,926	169,306
Provision for loan losses	2,500		4,000	2,000	3,500
Net interest income after provision for loan losses	169,984		167,301	164,926	165,806
Non-interest income	9,110		11,478	10,287	(20,794	)
Non-interest expenses	101,085		102,584	101,788	102,223
Income before income tax expense	78,009		76,195	73,425	42,789
Income tax expense	20,084		19,098	19,201	9,459
Net income	$	57,925	57,097	54,224	33,330
Basic earnings per common share	$	0.20	0.20	0.19	0.12
Diluted earnings per common share	$	0.20	0.20	0.19	0.12

121

Table of Contents

19. Earnings Per Share

The following is a summary of our earnings per share calculations and reconciliation of basic to diluted earnings per share.



	For the Year Ended December 31,
	2019		2018		2017
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Earnings for basic and diluted earnings per common share
Earnings applicable to common stockholders	$	195,484	$	202,576	$	126,744

Shares
Weighted-average common shares outstanding - basic	262,202,598		281,925,219		290,183,952
Effect of dilutive common stock equivalents⁽¹⁾	317,190		866,640		1,782,523
Weighted-average common shares outstanding - diluted	262,519,788		282,791,859		291,966,475

Earnings per common share
Basic	$	0.75	$	0.72	$	0.44
Diluted	$	0.74	$	0.72	$	0.43

(1) For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, there were 6,468,307, 9,761,548, and 10,246,677 equity awards, respectively, that could potentially dilute basic earnings per share in the future that were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because to do so would have been anti-dilutive for the periods presented.

20. Comprehensive Income

The components of comprehensive income, gross and net of tax, are as follows:



	Year Ended December 31, 2019							Year Ended December 31, 2018						Year Ended December 31, 2017
	Gross			Tax		Net		Gross		Tax		Net		Gross		Tax		Net
	(Dollars in thousands)
Net income	$	286,732		(91,248	)	195,484		270,418		(67,842	)	202,576		280,589		(153,845	)	126,744
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Change in funded status of retirement obligations	(5,108		)	1,436		(3,672	)	3,647		(1,025	)	2,622		313		(1,058	)	(745	)
Unrealized gains (losses) on debt securities available-for-sale	44,934			(10,815	)	34,119		(15,925	)	4,629		(11,296	)	(7,714	)	(434	)	(8,148	)
Accretion of loss on debt securities reclassified to held-to-maturity from available-for-sale	777			(242	)	535		834		(235	)	599		1,243		(775	)	468
Reclassification adjustment for security losses (gains) included in net income	5,690			(1,469	)	4,221		32,848		(8,646	)	24,202		(1,275	)	510		(765	)
Other-than-temporary impairment accretion on debt securities	1,068			(300	)	768		4,291		(1,206	)	3,085		1,614		(3,226	)	(1,612	)
Net (losses) gains on derivatives arising during the period	(59,847		)	16,823		(43,024	)	(1,163	)	327		(836	)	6,209		(146	)	6,063
Total other comprehensive (loss) income	(12,486		)	5,433		(7,053	)	24,532		(6,156	)	18,376		390		(5,129	)	(4,739	)
Total comprehensive income	$	274,246		(85,815	)	188,431		294,950		(73,998	)	220,952		280,979		(158,974	)	122,005

122

Table of Contents

The following table presents the after-tax changes in the balances of each component of accumulated other comprehensive loss for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:



	Change in funded status of retirement obligations			Accretion of loss on debt securities reclassified to held-to-maturity			Unrealized (losses) gains on debt securities available-for-sale and gains included in net income			Other-than-temporary impairment accretion on debt securities			Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives			Total accumulated other comprehensive loss
	(Dollars in thousands)
Balance - December 31, 2018	$	(3,018	)	(921		)	(8,884		)	(11,397		)	12,651			(11,569		)
Net change	(3,672		)	535			38,340			768			(43,024		)	(7,053		)
Balance - December 31, 2019	$	(6,690	)	(386		)	29,456			(10,629		)	(30,373		)	(18,622		)

Balance - December 31, 2017	$	(5,640	)	(1,520		)	(21,184		)	(14,482		)	13,487			(29,339		)
Net change	2,622			599			12,906			3,085			(836		)	18,376
Reclassification due to the adoption of ASU No. 2016-01	—			—			(606		)	—			—			(606		)
Balance - December 31, 2018	$	(3,018	)	$	(921	)	$	(8,884	)	$	(11,397	)	$	12,651		$	(11,569	)

The following table presents information about amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss to the consolidated statements of income and the affected line item in the statement where net income is presented.



	Year Ended December 31,
	2019			2018
	(In thousands)
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income
Loss on securities, net	$	5,690		32,848
Change in funded status of retirement obligations
Adjustment of net obligation	56			(137	)
Amortization of net (gain) loss	(8		)	517
Compensation and fringe benefits	48			380
Reclassification adjustment for unrealized gains on derivatives
Interest expense	(3,399		)	(2,056	)
Total before tax	2,339			31,172
Income tax expense	(403		)	(8,226	)
Net of tax	$	1,936		22,946

21. Revenue Recognition

The Company’s contracts with customers in the scope of Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, are contracts for deposit accounts and contracts for non-deposit investment accounts through a third-party service provider. Both types of contracts result in non-interest income being recognized. The revenue resulting from deposit accounts, which includes fees such as insufficient funds fees, wire transfer fees and out-of-network ATM transaction fees, is included as a component of fees and service charges on the consolidated statements of income. The revenue resulting from non-deposit investment accounts is included as a component of other income on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

123

Table of Contents

Revenue from contracts with customers included in fees and service charges and other income was as follows:



	For the Year Ended December 31,
	2019		2018	2017
	(In thousands)
Revenue from contracts with customers included in:
Fees and service charges	$	15,780	13,394	12,868
Other income	9,520		8,321	4,929
Total revenue from contracts with customers	$	25,300	21,715	17,797

For our contracts with customers, we satisfy our performance obligations each day as services are rendered. For our deposit account revenue, we receive payment on a daily basis as services are rendered and for our non-deposit investment account revenue, we receive payment on a monthly basis from our third-party service provider as services are rendered.

22. Recent Accounting Pronouncements



Standards Adopted in 2019
Standard	Description	Required date of adoption	Effect on Consolidated Financial Statements
Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial Instruments	This ASU makes clarifications and corrections to the application of the guidance contained in each of the amended topics. Regarding Topic 815, ASU 2019-04 amends guidance pertaining to partial-term fair value hedges of interest rate risk, disclosure of fair value hedge basis adjustments, and scope for not-for-profit entities. For Topic 825, the amendments provide scope clarifications for Subtopics 320-10, Investments-Debt and Equity Securities-Overall, and 321-10, Investments-Equity Securities-Overall, held-to-maturity debt securities fair value disclosures, and remeasurement of equity securities at historical exchange rates. Improvements to Topic 326 include, among others, conforming amendments to Subtopics 310-40, Receivables-Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors, and 323-10, Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures-Overall, clarification that reinsurance recoverables are within the scope of Subtopic 326-20, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses-Measured at Amortized Cost, and consideration of estimated costs to sell when foreclosure is probable.	January 1, 2020 Early adoption permitted	The Company early adopted ASU 2019-04 on June 13, 2019. Since the Company has already adopted ASUs 2016-01 and 2017-12, the related amendments were effective for the Company as of June 13, 2019. As part of the adoption, the Company reclassified $393.1 million of debt securities held-to-maturity to debt securities available-for-sale. The Company did not reclassify debt securities from held-to-maturity to available-for-sale upon adoption of the amendments in ASU 2017-12. Entities that did not reclassify debt securities from held-to-maturity to available-for-sale upon adoption of the amendments in ASU 2017-12 and elect to reclassify debt securities upon adoption of the amendments in this update are required to reflect the reclassification as of the date of adoption of this update. Entities that reclassified debt securities from held to-maturity to available-for-sale upon adoption of the amendments in ASU 2017-12 are not permitted to make any additional reclassifications.

124

Table of Contents



Standards Adopted in 2019
Standard	Description	Required date of adoption	Effect on Consolidated Financial Statements
Leases (Topic 842)	The amendment requires all lessees to recognize a lease liability and a right-of-use asset, measured at the present value of the future minimum lease payments, at the lease commencement date for leases classified as operating leases as well as finance leases. ASU 2018-01 provides an optional practical expedient to not evaluate land easements which were existing or expired before the adoption of Topic 842 that were not accounted for as leases under Topic 840. ASU 2018-10 provides an optional transition method under which comparative periods presented in the financial statements will continue to be in accordance with current Topic 840, Leases, and a practical expedient to not separate non-lease components from the associated lease component. ASU 2018-20 provides an accounting policy election for lessors related to sales and other similar taxes collected from lessees and addresses lessor accounting for variable payments. ASU 2019-01 addresses three issues related to (i) determination of the fair value of the underlying assets by lessors, (ii) presentation of sales-type and direct financing leases in the statement of cash flows and (iii) transition disclosures related to accounting changes and error corrections.	January 1, 2019	Upon adoption, the Company recognized operating lease right-of-use assets and related operating lease liabilities totaling $193.3 million and $200.7 million, respectively. The Company adopted this amendment utilizing a modified retrospective approach and the optional transition method under which we use the effective date as the date of initial application of the amendments. The modified retrospective approach includes practical expedients such that we will not reassess (i) whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases, (ii) the lease classification for any expired or existing leases and (iii) initial direct costs for any existing leases. See Note 7 for expanded disclosures.
Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815)-Inclusion of the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) Overnight Index Swap (OIS) Rate as a Benchmark Interest Rate for Hedge Accounting Purposes	The amendment permits the use of the Overnight Index Swap (OIS) Rate based on the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) as a U.S. benchmark interest rate for hedge accounting purposes.	January 1, 2019	The Company is applying the amendments in this update prospectively for qualifying new or redesignated hedging relationships entered into on or after the effective date.
Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting	The amendments in this update expand the scope of Topic 718 to include share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from nonemployees and to apply the guidance therein except for specific guidance on inputs to an option pricing model and the attribution of cost; i.e., the period of time over which share based payment awards vest and the pattern of cost recognition over that period. The amendments also clarify that Topic 718 does not apply to share-based payments used to effectively provide financing to the issuer or awards granted in conjunction with selling goods and services to customers as part of a contract accounted for under Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. Upon adoption, an entity should remeasure liability-classified awards that have not been settled at date of adoption and equity-classified awards for which a measurement date has not been established through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the first day of the fiscal year of adoption. Upon transition, an entity should measure these nonemployee awards at fair value as of the adoption date but must not remeasure assets that are completed.	January 1, 2019	The Company had applied the guidance of Topic 718 to its accounting for share-based payment awards to its Board of Directors prior to adoption of the amendments, and, therefore, this update did not have an impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

125

Table of Contents



Standards Adopted in 2019
Standard	Description	Required date of adoption	Effect on Consolidated Financial Statements
Receivables-Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities	The amendments in this update require the premium on callable debt securities to be amortized to the earliest call date rather than the maturity date; however, securities held at a discount continue to be amortized to maturity. The amendments apply only to debt securities purchased at a premium that are callable at fixed prices and on preset dates. The amendments more closely align interest income recorded on debt securities held at a premium or discount with the economics of the underlying instrument.	January 1, 2019	The adoption of the amendments did not have an impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

23. Subsequent Events

As defined in FASB ASC 855, “Subsequent Events”, subsequent events are events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or available to be issued. Financial statements are considered issued when they are widely distributed to stockholders and other financial statement users for general use and reliance in a form and format that complies with U.S. GAAP.

On January 29, 2020, the Company declared a cash dividend of $0.12 per share. The $0.12 dividend per share was paid to stockholders on February 25, 2020, with a record date of February 10, 2020.

126

Table of Contents



(a)(3)	Exhibits

The following exhibits are either filed as part of this report or are incorporated herein by reference:



2.1			Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Investors Bancorp, Inc. and Gold Coast Bancorp, Inc. dated as of July 24, 2019 ⁽¹⁵⁾

3.1			Certificate of Incorporation of Investors Bancorp, Inc. ⁽¹⁾

3.2			Bylaws of Investors Bancorp, Inc. ⁽¹⁾

4			Form of Common Stock Certificate of Investors Bancorp, Inc. ⁽¹⁾

4.2			Description of Registrant’s Securities

10.1			Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Investors Bancorp, Inc. and Kevin Cummings ⁽¹⁾

10.2			Acknowledgement and Consent Agreement between Kevin Cummings and Investors Bancorp, Inc. ⁽¹²⁾

10.3			Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Investors Bancorp, Inc. and Domenick A. Cama ⁽¹⁾

10.4			Acknowledgement and Consent Agreement between Domenick Cama and Investors Bancorp, Inc. ⁽¹²⁾

10.5			Amended and Restated Employment Agreement Investors Bancorp, Inc. and Richard S. Spengler ⁽²⁾

10.6			Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with Richard S. Spengler ⁽³⁾

10.7			Amended and Restated Employment Agreement Investors Bancorp, Inc. and Paul Kalamaras ⁽⁴⁾

10.8			Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with Paul Kalamaras ⁽³⁾

10.9			Acknowledgement and Consent Agreement between Paul Kalamaras and Investors Bancorp, Inc. ⁽¹³⁾

10.10			Employment Agreement Investors Bancorp, Inc. and Sean Burke ⁽⁵⁾

10.11			Amendment to Employment Agreement with Sean Burke ⁽³⁾

10.12			Investors Bancorp, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan ⁽⁶⁾

10.13			First Amendment to the Investors Bancorp, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan ⁽¹¹⁾

10.14			Investors Bancorp, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan ⁽⁷⁾

10.15			Investors Bank Executive Officer Annual Incentive Plan ⁽⁸⁾

10.16			Investors Bank Amended and Restated Supplemental ESOP and Retirement Plan ⁽¹⁾

10.17			Amended and Restated Investors Bank Executive Supplemental Retirement Wage Replacement Plan ⁽¹⁾

10.18			Amendment to Amended and Restated Investors Bank Executive Supplemental Retirement Wage Replacement Plan dated December 19, 2016 ⁽¹⁰⁾

10.19			Investors Bank Amended and Restated Supplemental ESOP and Retirement Plan dated February 29, 2016 ⁽¹⁰⁾

10.20			Investors Bank Amended and Restated Director Retirement Plan ⁽¹⁾

10.21			Investors Bancorp, Inc. Deferred Directors Fee Plan ⁽¹⁾

10.22			Investors Bank Deferred Directors Fee Plan ⁽¹⁾

10.23			Split Dollar Life Insurance Agreement between Roma Bank and Robert C. Albanese, as assumed by Investors Bank ⁽⁹⁾

10.24			Split Dollar Life Insurance Agreement between Roma Bank and Dennis M. Bone, assumed by Investors Bank ⁽⁹⁾

10.25			Split Dollar Life Insurance Agreement between Roma Bank and Michele N. Siekerka, as assumed by Investors Bank ⁽⁹⁾

127

Table of Contents



10.26			Split Dollar Life Insurance Agreement between Marathon National Bank of New York and Paul Stathoulopoulos, as assumed by Investors Bank ⁽¹⁴⁾

10.27			Agreement between Investors Bancorp, Inc. and Blue Harbour Group, L.P. ⁽¹¹⁾

10.28			Purchase Agreement dated December 17, 2019 between Investors Bancorp, Inc. and Blue Harbour Group, L.P. ⁽¹⁶⁾

21			Subsidiaries of Registrant

23.1			Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

31.1			Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2			Certification of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1			Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101			Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (vi) related notes to these financial statements

104			Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded in the cover page formatted in Inline XBRL)

128

Table of Contents



(1)	Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Investors Bancorp, Inc. (Commission File no. 333-192966), originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 20, 2013.
(2)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Investors Bancorp, Inc. (Commission File No. 000-51557) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 1, 2010.
(3)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibits 10.1, 10.2 and 10.3 to the Quarterly Report on 10-Q of Investors Bancorp, Inc. (Commission File No. 001-36441) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 10, 2016.
(4)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Investors Bancorp, Inc. (Commission File No. 000-51557) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 1, 2010.
(5)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Investors Bancorp, Inc. (Commission File No. 001-36441) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 3, 2015.
(6)	Incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Definitive Proxy Statement for Investors Bancorp, Inc.’s 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (Commission File No. 001-36441) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 30, 2015.
(7)	Incorporated by reference to Appendix B to the Definitive Proxy Statement for Investors Bancorp, Inc.’s 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (Commission File No. 000-51557) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 15, 2006.
(8)	Incorporated by reference to Annex D to the Definitive Proxy Statement for Investors Bancorp, Inc.’s 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (Commission File No. 000-51557) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 29, 2013.
(9)	Incorporated by reference to the Amended Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Investors Bancorp, Inc. (Commission File No. 333-192966) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 11, 2014.
(10)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibits 10.15 and 10.16 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Investors Bancorp, Inc. (Commission File No. 001-36441) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 1, 2017.
(11)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibits 10.1 and 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Investors Bancorp, Inc. (Commission File No. 001-36441) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 10, 2017.
(12)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibits 10.1 and 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Investors Bancorp, Inc. (Commission File No. 001-36441) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 10, 2018.
(13)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Investors Bancorp, Inc. (Commission File No. 001-36441) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 7, 2018.
(14)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Investors Bancorp, Inc. (Commission File No. 001-36441) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 10, 2019.
(15)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Investors Bancorp, Inc. (Commission File No. 001-36441) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 30, 2019.
(16)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Investors Bancorp, Inc. (Commission File No. 001-36441) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 18, 2019.

129

Table of Contents



ITEM 16.	FORM 10-K SUMMARY

None.

130

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.




			INVESTORS BANCORP, INC.

Date:	February 28, 2020	By:	/s/ Kevin Cummings
			Kevin Cummings Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) (Duly Authorized Representative)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

131

Table of Contents




Signatures	Title	Date

/s/ Kevin Cummings Kevin Cummings	Director, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)	February 28, 2020

/s/ Domenick Cama Domenick Cama	Director, President and Chief Operating Officer	February 28, 2020

/s/ Sean Burke Sean Burke	Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)	February 28, 2020

/s/ Robert C. Albanese Robert C. Albanese	Director	February 28, 2020

/s/ Dennis M. Bone Dennis M. Bone	Director	February 28, 2020

/s/ Doreen R. Byrnes Doreen R. Byrnes	Director	February 28, 2020

/s/ William Cosgrove William Cosgrove	Director	February 28, 2020

/s/ James Garibaldi James Garibaldi	Director	February 28, 2020

/s/ Michele N. Siekerka Michele N. Siekerka	Director	February 28, 2020

/s/ Paul N. Stathoulopoulos Paul N. Stathoulopoulos	Director	February 28, 2020

/s/ James H. Ward III James H. Ward III	Director	February 28, 2020

132