​

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

​

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.    )

​

Filed by the Registrant   ☒                            Filed by a party other than the Registrant   ☐

​

Check the appropriate box:

​

​

​

PARAMOUNT GROUP, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

​

Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

NOTICE OF 2023 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

​

​

To Our Fellow Stockholders,

On behalf of the entire Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Paramount Group, Inc. (NYSE: PGRE), we are pleased to present you with our 2023 Proxy Statement, and we invite you to attend our annual meeting of stockholders.

Items of Business:

​

​

​

​

Proxy Voting

If you do not plan to attend the meeting and vote your shares of common stock in person, we urge you to vote your shares as instructed in the proxy statement. If you received a copy of the proxy card by mail, you may sign, date and mail the proxy card in the postage-paid envelope provided.

If your shares of common stock are held by a broker, bank or other nominee, please follow the instructions you receive from your broker, bank or other nominee to have your shares of common stock voted.

Any proxy may be revoked at any time prior to its exercise at the annual meeting.

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

​

​

PARAMOUNT GROUP, INC.

1633 Broadway, Suite 1801, New York, New York 10019

PROXY STATEMENT

These proxy materials are being made available in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Paramount Group, Inc., a Maryland corporation, for use at our 2023 annual meeting of stockholders to be held on Thursday, May 18, 2023, at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time, at the Whitby Hotel, 18 West 56^th Street, New York, New York or at any postponement or adjournment of the annual meeting. References in this proxy statement to “we,” “us,” “our,” “ours” and the “Company” refer to Paramount Group, Inc., unless the context otherwise requires. This proxy statement and a form of proxy have been made available to our stockholders on the internet and the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials has been mailed to stockholders on or about April 6, 2023.

​

​

​

​
​​

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MEETING

Who is entitled to vote at the annual meeting?

Holders of record of our common stock, $0.01 par value per share, at the close of business on March 28, 2023, the record date for the annual meeting, are entitled to receive notice of the annual meeting and to vote at the annual meeting. If you are a holder of record of our common stock as of the record date, you may vote the shares that you held on the record date even if you sell such shares after the record date. Each outstanding share as of the record date entitles its holder to cast one vote for each matter to be voted upon and, with respect to the election of directors, one vote for each director to be elected. Stockholders do not have the right to cumulate voting for the election of directors.

What is the purpose of the annual meeting?

At the annual meeting, you will be asked to vote on the following proposals:

​

​

​

You also may be asked to consider and act upon any other matters that may properly be brought before the annual meeting and at any adjournments or postponements thereof.

What constitutes a quorum?

The presence, in person or by proxy, of holders of a majority of the total number of outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote at the annual meeting is necessary to constitute a quorum for the transaction of any business at the annual meeting. As of March 28, 2023, there were 217,211,716 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the annual meeting.

Each share of common stock outstanding on the record date is entitled to one vote on each matter properly submitted at the annual meeting and, with respect to the election of directors, one vote for each director to be elected. Abstentions and “broker non-votes” (i.e., shares represented at the meeting held by brokers, as to which instructions have not been received from the beneficial owners or persons entitled to vote such shares and with respect to which, on a particular matter, the broker does not have discretionary voting power to vote such shares) will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present for the transaction of business at the annual meeting.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MEETING
​

What vote is required to approve each proposal?

In respect of Proposal 1, a nominee is elected if he or she receives more votes for his or her election than votes against his or her election. Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, any incumbent director who fails to be elected by a majority vote in an uncontested election is required to tender his or her resignation to the Board, subject to acceptance, and any nominee who is not yet a director must receive a majority of votes for his or her election to be affected. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is required to make a recommendation to the Board with respect to the resignation. The Board is required to take action with respect to this recommendation and to disclose its decision and, if applicable, the Board’s reasons for rejecting the tendered resignation. The policy is described more fully below under the caption “Corporate Governance Matters – Annual Elections; Majority Voting.” Abstentions and broker non-votes with respect to Proposal 1 will have no effect on the election of directors.

A majority of votes cast with respect to the proposal is required for approval of each of Proposal 2 and Proposal 3. In respect of Proposal 2 and Proposal 3, abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the votes for these proposals. Furthermore, the vote for Proposal 2 is advisory and not binding on the Board or the Company in any way.

Can I change my vote after I submit my proxy card?

If you cast a vote by proxy, you may revoke it at any time before it is voted by:

If you attend the annual meeting, you may vote in person whether or not you previously have given a proxy, but your presence (without further action) at the annual meeting will not constitute revocation of a previously given proxy. Unless you have received a legal proxy to vote the shares, if you hold your shares through a bank, broker or other nominee -- that is, in “street name” -- only that bank, broker or other nominee can revoke your proxy on your behalf.

You may revoke a proxy for shares held by a bank, broker or other nominee by submitting new voting instructions to the bank, broker or other nominee or, if you have obtained a legal proxy from the bank, broker or other nominee giving you the right to vote the shares at the annual meeting, by attending the annual meeting and voting in person.

​

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MEETING
​

How do I vote?

​

If your shares are held in an account at a brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other similar organization, then you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” and the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials was forwarded to you by that organization. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to instruct that organization on how to vote the shares held in your account. You should instruct your broker or nominee how to vote your shares by following the voting instructions provided by your broker or nominee. If you request printed copies of the proxy materials by mail, you will receive a vote instruction form for this purpose.

Even if you plan to attend the annual meeting, we recommend that you submit a proxy to vote your shares in advance so that your vote will be counted if you later are unable to attend the annual meeting.

How is my vote counted?

If you authorize your proxy to vote your shares electronically via the internet or by telephone, or, if you received a proxy card by mail and you properly marked, signed, dated and returned it, the shares that the proxy represents will be voted in the manner specified on the proxy. If no specification is made, your shares will be voted “for” the election of the nominees for the directors named in this proxy statement, “for” advisory approval of the compensation of our named executive officers, and “for” ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2023. It is not anticipated that any matters other than those set forth in this proxy statement will be presented at the annual meeting. If other matters are presented, proxies will be voted in accordance with the discretion of the proxy holders.

How does the Board recommend that I vote on each of the proposals?

The Board recommends that you vote:

​

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MEETING
​

What other information should I review before voting?

Our 2022 annual report, including our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, is being made available to you along with this proxy statement. You may obtain, free of charge, copies of our 2022 annual report and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, which contains additional information about the Company, on our website at www.pgre.com or by directing your request in writing to Paramount Group, Inc., 1633 Broadway, Suite 1801, New York, New York 10019, Attention: Investor Relations. The 2022 annual report and the Annual Report on Form 10-K, however, are not part of the proxy solicitation materials, and the information found on, or accessible through, our website is not incorporated into, and does not form a part of, this proxy statement or any other report or document we file with or furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

Who is soliciting my proxy?

This solicitation of proxies is made by and on behalf of the Board. We will pay the cost of the solicitation of proxies. In addition to the solicitation of proxies by mail, our directors, officers and employees may solicit proxies personally or by telephone. No arrangements or contracts have been made with any solicitors as of the date of this proxy statement, although we reserve the right to engage solicitors if we deem them necessary. Such solicitations may be made by mail, telephone, facsimile, e-mail or personal interviews.

Why didn’t I automatically receive a paper copy of the proxy statement, proxy card and annual report?

Pursuant to rules adopted by the SEC, we have elected to provide access to our proxy materials via the internet. Accordingly, rather than paper copies of our proxy materials, we are sending a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to our stockholders.

How can I change how I receive proxy materials in the future?

The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials includes instructions on how to access our proxy materials over the internet at www.proxyvote.com and how to request a printed set of the proxy materials by mail or an electronic set of materials by e-mail.

Instead of receiving a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials in the mail, stockholders may elect to receive future proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by e-mail on an ongoing basis. Choosing to receive future proxy materials by e-mail will save the Company the cost of printing and mailing documents to you and will reduce the environmental impact of the annual meeting. If you choose to receive future proxy materials by e-mail, you will receive an e-mail next year with instructions containing a link to those materials and a link to the proxy voting site. You can change your election by sending a blank e-mail with the 16-digit control number on your proxy card to sendmaterial@proxyvote.com, via the internet at www.proxyvote.com or by telephone at (800) 579-1639. Your election to receive future proxy materials by e-mail will remain in effect until you terminate it.

​

​

​

​
​​

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS

Corporate Governance Highlights

​

Stockholder Engagement

The Board and management believe that engaging in stockholder outreach is an essential element of strong corporate governance. We strive for a collaborative approach to issues of importance to investors and continually seek to better understand the views of our investors on key topics affecting our business. Historically, we have done that on a regular basis throughout the year as management engages in communications with our investors to ensure that management and the Board understand and consider the issues that are important to our stockholders. For example, in 2022, in addition to the public question and answer sessions occurring immediately after our four earnings calls, we presented at industry conferences and held non-deal road shows where we met with 98 investors over the course of the year. These investors and analysts heard presentations from our senior management about all aspects of our business including business results and initiatives, strategy, and capital structure (which presentation materials were also made available to our stockholders generally through our filings with the SEC or on the “Investors” section of our website at www.pgre.com). Each quarter, our chairman summarizes these meetings and any feedback received for our Board.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
​

Beginning in 2021, we also began reaching out to the stewardship teams of many of our larger stockholders to help ensure that we were appropriately engaging on non-economic issues such as those which drive our ESG performance as well. The genesis for this was that at our annual meeting in May 2021, the members of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee received significantly lower support than the rest of our Board, including, particularly, Mark Patterson, who at that time was the chairman of that committee and also our lead independent director. In response, the Board directed the Company to specifically engage with stockholders on any issues that may have contributed to this lower support. The charge for us, in a word, was to “listen.”

To this end, starting in fall 2021 and continuing into early 2022, Greg Wright, an independent director and a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee at that time, on behalf of the Board, worked with our senior management team and investor relations professionals and extended an offer to meet one-on-one with the governance teams of each of our top institutional stockholders based on information publicly available at that time. In these conversations, we discussed our ESG performance in general, and emphasized various governance issues on which the Board had deliberated previously in response to the recommendations from leading proxy advisory firms. As reported in last year’s proxy statement, by February 2022, we had met (or offered to meet) with major investors representing more than half of our outstanding common stock (excluding stockholders represented on, or affiliated with stockholders represented on, our Board) to discuss a variety of topics, including Mr. Patterson’s suitability and performance as a director, Board-level diversity, various bylaw provisions and various ESG matters.

We listened to our stockholders on each of these topics and whatever else was “top of mind” for them, and then shared the feedback received during our outreach process with the Board. As a result, as described in our 2022 proxy statement, we made a number of meaningful changes to various of our corporate governance practices and related disclosures in response to what we learned during these engagements. We provided details for this—“What we heard” and “What we did” in our 2022 proxy statement. The meaningful changes we made in response to stockholder feedback were noted by stockholders and resulted in a material improvement in the voting results for our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee members at our 2022 annual meeting.

One of the consistent themes we heard during our outreach was that these stewardship-focused meetings should continue on a regular basis, so that we are in a better position to know what is important to our stockholders “real time,” and to address any issues early on, even those we may not be able to accommodate. To that end, in 2022, we again reached out to continue this dialogue with our stockholders, approaching nearly 80% of our stockholder base, excluding only those who would typically not engage and/or whose holdings were less than 0.5% of our outstanding common stock. Mr. Wright once again led these meetings on behalf of our Board, with one exception, where Mr. Patterson participated instead.

We have again summarized in the table below the major topics discussed and our responses.

​

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
​

​

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
​

​

We appreciate the time our stockholders spent engaging with us, and the candor of those discussions. Our goal is to continue these types of discussions with our stockholders on a wide range of matters, as they provide valuable feedback and enable us to address stockholder concerns and interests in designing and implementing our programs and practices.

​

​

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
​

Corporate Governance Guidelines

We are committed to operating our business under strong and accountable corporate governance practices. The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines that address significant issues of corporate governance and set forth procedures by which the Board carries out its responsibilities. Among the areas addressed by the Corporate Governance Guidelines are director qualification standards, director responsibilities, Board structure, director access to management and independent advisors, director compensation, director orientation and continuing education, management succession, annual performance evaluation of the Board and committees, related person transaction approval and disclosure policy, and stockholder rights plan. Under the Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Company will not adopt a stockholder rights plan unless the Company’s stockholders approve in advance the adoption of a plan or, if adopted by the Board, the Company will submit the stockholder rights plan to its stockholders for a ratification vote within 12 months of adoption or the plan will terminate. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for, among other things, assessing and periodically reviewing the adequacy of the Corporate Governance Guidelines and will recommend, as appropriate, proposed changes to the Board.

You are encouraged to visit the “Investors–Corporate Governance” section of our website at www.pgre.com to view or to obtain copies of our committee charters, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Corporate Governance Guidelines and stockholder communication policy. The information found on, or accessible through, our website is not incorporated into, and does not form a part of, this proxy statement or any other report or document we file with or furnish to the SEC. You also may obtain, free of charge, a copy of the respective charters of our committees, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Corporate Governance Guidelines and stockholder communication policy by directing your request in writing to Paramount Group, Inc., 1633 Broadway, Suite 1801, New York, New York 10019, Attention: Investor Relations. Additional information relating to the corporate governance of the Company also is included in other sections of this proxy statement.

Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) Commitment

We are dedicated to responsible environmental, social and community stewardship as an essential part of our mission to build a successful business and to shape the communities we serve throughout our portfolio, in addition to our workplace community. To learn more about our ESG initiatives, please visit the “Sustainability” section of our website at www.pgre.com which includes links to our latest Sustainability Report, a list of awards we have achieved as an environmental leader, and other important ESG policies such as our Human Rights Policy, Environmental Policy, Policy on Company Political Spending and Vendor Code of Conduct. The information found on, or otherwise through, our website is not incorporated by reference into, nor does it form a part of, the proxy statement.

Our Sustainability Committee consists of a diverse group of leaders from each department including our Senior Vice President, Energy and Sustainability. The committee is chaired by Gage Johnson, our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary and operates under a formal charter, reporting on a regular basis to our Audit Committee, which the Board has vested with oversight responsibility for all environmental and social matters, including sustainability, climate change, corporate social responsibility, and health and safety. While our annual Sustainability Report or ESG Report may report on governance matters as well, these are overseen by our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

​

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
​

Board Overview

The following pages provide information about our Board of Directors, all members of which are standing for re-election at the 2023 Annual Meeting.

​

Chair C Member   ●

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
​

​

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
​

Board Leadership

Leadership Structure

Our Board currently is comprised of nine independent directors (all of whom are being nominated to stand for re-election at the annual meeting) and one non-independent director. Albert Behler, our Chief Executive Officer and President, serves as Chairman of the Board. Our Board believes that the Company and our stockholders are best served by having Mr. Behler serve as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Behler’s over 30 years of experience leading the Company and its predecessor and significant ownership interest in the Company uniquely qualify him to serve as both Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. In addition, our Board believes that Mr. Behler’s combined role as an executive officer and the Chairman of our Board promotes unified leadership and direction for our Board and executive management, and it allows for a single, clear focus for the chain of command to execute our strategic initiatives and business plans.

Lead Independent Director

To facilitate the role of the independent directors, the Board has determined that it is appropriate for the independent directors to appoint one independent director to serve as Lead Independent Director. The Lead Independent Director is currently Martin Bussmann. We believe that the number of independent, experienced directors that make up our Board, along with the independent oversight of our Lead Independent Director, benefits the Company and its stockholders.

We recognize that different board leadership structures may be appropriate for companies in different situations, and that no one structure is suitable for all companies. Our current Board leadership structure is optimal for us because it demonstrates to our employees and other stakeholders that the Company is under strong leadership. In our judgment, the Company, like many companies, has been well-served by this leadership structure.

The Lead Independent Director has the following responsibilities:

Our Lead Independent Director also has the authority to call meetings of the independent directors. We believe that the Lead Independent Director is an integral part of the Board’s structure that promotes strong, independent oversight of our management and affairs.

​

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
​

Board Committees

The Board held eight meetings during fiscal year 2022, and all directors attended 75% or more of the board of directors meetings and meetings of the committees on which they served during the periods they served. The Board currently has the following four standing committees:

The Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are composed exclusively of independent directors, in accordance with the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) listing standards. The principal functions of each committee are briefly described below. The current charters for each of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are available on our website at www.pgre.com under the “Investors–Corporate Governance” section. Further, we will provide a copy of these charters free of charge to each stockholder upon written request. Requests for copies should be addressed to Gage Johnson, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, at Paramount Group, Inc., 1633 Broadway, Suite 1801, New York, New York 10019. From time to time, the Board also may create additional committees for such purposes as the Board may determine.

​

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
​

​

​

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
​

​

​

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
​

​

​

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
​

Director Independence

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that a majority of our directors serving on the Board and all directors serving on the Board committees (other than the Investment and Finance Committee) must be independent as required by the listing standards of the NYSE and the applicable rules promulgated by the SEC. The Board has determined affirmatively, based upon its review of all relevant facts and circumstances and after considering all applicable relationships of which the Board had knowledge, between or among the directors and the Company or our management, that each of the following directors has no direct or indirect material relationship with us and is independent under the listing standards of the NYSE: Thomas Armbrust, Martin Bussmann, Karin Klein, Peter Linneman, Katharina Otto-Bernstein, Mark Patterson, Hitoshi Saito, Paula Sutter and Greg Wright. Some of the relationships considered by our board of directors are described in the section of this proxy statement entitled “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions.” For Ms. Otto-Bernstein and Mr. Armbrust, the Board considered the direct and indirect interests of each director in (i) the Company’s real estate funds and the distributions made by those funds, (ii) previously disclosed transactions in connection with the Company’s formation and initial public offering, (iii) a lease of space at 1325 Avenue of Americas and, prior to December 1, 2022, 1633 Broadway, to ParkProperty Capital, LP (“ParkProperty”), (iv) a previously disclosed joint venture with an affiliate of the Company to acquire an interest in 55 Second Street and (v) certain notes entered into in connection with the Company’s formation that were owed by certain executive officers of the Company to ParkProperty, the last of which were paid off during 2022. In addition, the Board considered certain additional transactions and relationships, including (1) for Dr. Linneman, the direct and indirect interests he holds in two of the Company’s real estate funds and the distributions made by those funds, (2) for Dr. Bussmann, a lease of space at 712 Fifth Avenue to a subsidiary of a trust for which Dr. Bussmann was, prior to December 12, 2022, a trustee of the trust and a director of the trust subsidiary, and for which his children remain as beneficiaries, (3) for Mr. Patterson, the prior employment of a member of his immediate family as an intern, (4) for Mr. Wright, his prior relationship with the Company in his former role at Bank of America Merrill Lynch, which was the lead investment bank for the Company’s initial public offering and (5) for Mr. Saito, his prior service as a member of the Advisory Board of the Company’s operating partnership.

Director Compensation

The Board has established a compensation program for our non-employee directors. Our Compensation Committee reviews our director compensation at least annually and makes recommendations to the Board based on its review.

We pay the following fees to our non-employee directors on a quarterly basis, in cash, except as noted below:

We will also reimburse each of our directors for his or her travel expenses incurred in connection with his or her attendance at full Board and committee meetings. No additional compensation is received by the members of our Investment and Finance Committee. Directors of the Company who are also employees receive no additional compensation for their services as directors.

​

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
​

In December 2022, the Board adopted a Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan (the “Director Compensation Plan”) which sets forth the annual cash retainers listed above and the amount and vesting terms of the annual equity grants payable to our non-employee directors. With regard to the annual retainer of $65,000, the Director Compensation Plan also newly provided that each non-employee director may elect, on or before December 31 of each year, to receive such retainer in cash, quarterly in arrears, the following calendar year, or alternatively, a one-time grant of equity (i.e., LTIP units or shares of restricted common stock as indicated below) in lieu of cash, which will be made the following year on December 15, with the number of shares or units being calculated by dividing the amount of the annual cash retainer by the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date.

In order to encourage our non-employee directors to acquire a significant equity stake in the Company and to align our non-employee directors and stockholders, at each annual stockholder meeting we will grant each of our non-employee directors LTIP units or shares of restricted common stock under our Amended and Restated 2014 Equity Incentive Plan with a value of $120,000 which will vest upon the earlier of the anniversary of the date of the grant or the next annual stockholder meeting.

The following table sets forth information regarding the compensation paid to our non-employee directors during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022:

​

​

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
​

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

Our Board has established a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to our officers, directors and employees. Among other matters, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote:

Any waiver of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for our directors or officers may be made only by our Board or our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and will be promptly disclosed as required by law or NYSE regulations. We intend to disclose on our website any amendment to, or waiver of, any provisions of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to our directors and executive officers that would otherwise be required to be disclosed under the rules of the SEC or the NYSE.

Communications with the Board

We have a process by which stockholders and other interested parties may communicate with the non-employee directors, both individually and as a group, through the Board’s Lead Independent Director. In cases where stockholders or other interested parties wish to communicate directly with non-employee directors, messages can be sent in writing or by email to: Lead Independent Director, Paramount Group, Inc., c/o Navex Ethics Hotline (“Navex”) using the following link: www.pgre.ethicspoint.com, or any other link to or toll-free number of a third party reporting service approved by the Lead Independent Director from time to time and posted on our website in our Shareholder Communications Policy which can be found in the “Investors/Corporate Governance” section or as may be otherwise appropriately disseminated. Navex acts as agent for the Lead Independent Director in facilitating direct communications to him and any other non-employee directors he requests. Any such communications may be made anonymously.

Audit Committee Complaint Procedures

Our Audit Committee has established procedures for (i) the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by the Company regarding accounting, internal controls, or auditing matters and (ii) the confidential, anonymous submission by our employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters. If you wish to contact our Audit Committee to report complaints or concerns relating to the financial reporting of the Company, you may do so in writing to the Chairperson of our Audit Committee, c/o Navex using the following link: www.pgre.ethicspoint.com, or the toll-free number provided in the link, or any other link to or toll-free number of a third party reporting service approved by the Chairperson of the Audit Committee from time to time and posted on our website or otherwise appropriately disseminated. Any such communications may be made anonymously.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
​

Director Attendance at Annual Meetings

We encourage each member of the Board to attend each annual meeting of stockholders. All of our directors who are standing for re-election attended in person or by teleconference the annual meeting of stockholders held on May 12, 2022, except Ms. Sutter, who was not yet a director at that time.

Identification of Director Candidates

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assists the Board in identifying and reviewing director candidates to determine whether they qualify for membership on the Board and recommends director nominees to the Board to be considered for election at our annual meeting of stockholders. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has adopted a written policy on the criteria and process of identifying and reviewing director candidates.

At a minimum, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee must be satisfied that each director candidate (i) has experience at a strategic or policymaking level in a business, legal, accounting, government, non-profit or academic organization of high standing, (ii) is highly accomplished in his or her respective field, (iii) is well regarded in the community and has a reputation for the highest ethical and moral standards and (iv) has sufficient time and availability to devote to the affairs of the Company, particularly in light of the number of boards on which the nominee may serve. In this regard, the committee has considered the skills and experiences of each director candidate as set forth above under “Board Skills and Experience”.

In addition to the minimum qualifications for each nominee set forth above, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee must recommend that the Board select persons for nomination to help ensure that (i) a majority of the Board will be “independent” in accordance with the standards established pursuant to Section 303A of the NYSE Listed Company Manual, (ii) each of its Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees will be comprised entirely of independent directors and (iii) at least one member of the Audit Committee will have accounting or related financial management expertise.

Finally, in addition to any other standards the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may deem appropriate from time to time for the overall structure and composition of the Board, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may, but is not required to, consider (i) whether the nominee has direct experience in the real estate industry, particularly in the office real estate industry, or in the markets in which the Company operates, and (ii) whether the nominee, if elected, assists in achieving a mix of Board members that represents a diversity of background and experience. In this regard, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s procedures require it to ensure to the greatest extent practicable that the pool of prospective candidates that it considers to fill any vacancy or additional director position includes one or more female candidates or one or more racially or ethnically diverse candidates if, at such time, the Board is lacking gender diversity or racial/ethnic diversity, respectively.

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may consider director candidates recommended by our stockholders. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will apply the same standards in considering candidates submitted by stockholders as it does in evaluating candidates submitted by members of the Board. Any recommendations by stockholders are to follow the procedures outlined under “Stockholder Proposals” in this proxy statement and should provide the reasons supporting a candidate’s recommendation, the candidate’s qualifications and the candidate’s written consent to being considered as a director nominee.

As previously disclosed, we have entered into a stockholders agreement with Maren Otto, Katharina Otto-Bernstein and Alexander Otto providing these members of the Otto family with the right, collectively, to designate up to three director nominees to our Board. The number of director nominees that these members of the Otto family will have the right to designate may be reduced in the future based on reductions in the percentage of our total outstanding common stock owned by these individuals, their lineal descendants or entities they own or control collectively. Albert Behler, Thomas Armbrust and Katharina Otto-Bernstein have been designated for nomination to our Board pursuant to the stockholders agreement.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
​

Proxy Access

As part of our commitment to corporate governance, in February 2022 we amended our bylaws to adopt a proxy access right for stockholders, pursuant to which a stockholder, or group of no more than 20 stockholders, meeting specified eligibility requirements, may include director nominees in our proxy materials for annual meetings of our stockholders. In order to be eligible to utilize these proxy access provisions, a stockholder, or group of stockholders, must, among other requirements:

​

Additionally, all director nominees submitted through these provisions must be independent and meet specified additional criteria. The maximum number of director nominees that may be submitted pursuant to these provisions may not exceed the greater of two directors or 20% of the number of directors then in office.

The full text of our Sixth Amended and Restated Bylaws, which incorporates these proxy access provisions, was filed as Exhibit 3.1 to a Form 8-K which we filed on July 26, 2022 in connection with a subsequent revision to our bylaws, among other things.

Executive Sessions of Non-Management Directors

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines require the non-management directors serving on the Board to meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions without management participation and to hold an executive session at least once each year with only independent directors present. In accordance with such requirement, our non-management directors and/or our independent directors meet in executive sessions from time to time on such a basis. The executive sessions are chaired by our Lead Independent Director.

Annual Elections; Majority Voting

Each of our directors will be elected by our stockholders to serve until our next annual meeting of stockholders and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified. Our bylaws provide for majority voting in uncontested director elections. Pursuant to our bylaws, in a contested election, directors are elected by a plurality of all of the votes cast in the election of directors, and in an uncontested election, a director is elected if he or she receives more votes for his or her election than votes against his or her election. Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, any director who fails to be elected by a majority vote in an uncontested election is required to tender his or her resignation to our Board, subject to acceptance. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will make a recommendation to our Board on whether to accept or reject the resignation, or whether other action should be taken. Our Board will then act on our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation and publicly disclose its decision and the rationale behind it within 90 days from the date of the certification of election results. If the resignation is not accepted, the director will continue to serve until the next annual meeting and until the director’s successor is duly elected and qualifies. The director who tenders his or her resignation will not participate in our Board’s decision.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
​

Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policy

None of our executives have engaged in any hedging transactions with respect to our stock and none of our executives currently have pledges with respect to our stock in place. Under our anti-hedging policy no executive or director may buy or sell puts, calls, other derivative securities of the Company or any derivative securities that provide the economic equivalent of ownership of any of the Company’s securities or an opportunity, direct or indirect, to profit from any change in the value of the Company’s securities or engage in any other hedging transaction with respect to the Company’s securities, at any time unless such transaction has been approved by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

We also have an anti-pledging policy whereby no executive or director may pledge Company securities as collateral for a loan (or modify an existing pledge) unless the pledge has been approved by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

Forum Selection

We adopted an exclusive forum provision under Article XV of our bylaws at the time of our initial public offering in 2014. Since that time, Maryland has adopted a statute which confirms statutorily the acceptability of such provisions. Section 2-113 of the Maryland General Corporation Law (the “MGCL”), which became effective October 1, 2017, expressly provides that the charter or bylaws of a Maryland corporation may require that an “Internal Corporate Claim” (as defined below) be brought only in courts sitting in one or more jurisdictions specified in the charter or bylaws but must include the state and federal courts sitting in Maryland.

“Internal Corporate Claim” means a claim, including a claim brought by or in the right of a corporation: (a) based on an alleged breach by a director, an officer or a stockholder of a duty owed to the corporation or to the stockholders or breach by a director of a standard of conduct applicable to the director; (b) arising under the MGCL; or (c) arising under the charter or bylaws of the corporation.

Under our bylaws, as these provisions were amended by our Board in February 2021, derivative claims, Internal Corporate Claims, and all actions against the corporation, its directors, officers or employees must be brought in Maryland state court (or Maryland federal court if for some reason the state court does not have jurisdiction), and actions alleging violations of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, can only be brought in federal, not state, court, but can be brought anywhere in the United States. These provisions apply unless we consent otherwise.

We believe that our forum selection provision in our bylaws balances competing interests fairly, granting our stockholders an opportunity to bring actions in our name or against us, but requiring use of courts which are likely to be most familiar with the issues, thus discouraging forum shopping, preserving our resources and ensuring access to justice in a manner we believe is appropriate. During our recent shareholder outreach discussions, we had an opportunity to discuss this provision with our major shareholders, and we believe that the vast majority of them are supportive of our approach.

​

Minimum Share Ownership Guidelines for Executive Officers and Directors

We have adopted minimum stock ownership guidelines that require each executive officer to maintain a minimum number of shares of our common stock (including operating partnership units and LTIP units) having a value equal to or greater than a multiple (six times, in the case of our Chief Executive Officer, and three times, in the case of all other Section 16 executive officers) of such executive officer’s base salary. In calculating minimum stock ownership guidelines, we exclude stock options, AOLTIP units and unearned performance LTIP units. Each executive officer who was already employed by the Company when the guidelines were adopted in February 2016 was required to achieve the minimum equity investment within five years, by February 23, 2021, and did so. For each officer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
​

subsequently appointed, he or she must achieve the minimum level of equity within five years of the date of such officer’s appointment, and until such time as the executive officer achieves such minimum, he or she must retain 50% of the value of any vested award, net of taxes.

We have also adopted minimum stock ownership guidelines for our independent directors. These guidelines require our directors to hold a number of shares of our common stock (including operating partnership units and LTIP units) having a market value equal to or greater than five times the portion of the annual base retainer which is eligible to be paid in cash. In calculating minimum stock ownership guidelines, we exclude stock options, AOLTIP units and unearned performance LTIP units. Each independent director who was serving when the guidelines were adopted was required to achieve the minimum equity investment by February 23, 2021, and did so. Those who were elected after the policy was adopted in February 2016 have five years from the date of their initial election to our Board to attain compliance with the stock ownership requirements.

Risk Oversight

Our Board is responsible for overseeing the Company’s risk management process. The Board focuses on the Company’s general risk management strategy and the most significant risks facing the Company, and ensures that appropriate risk mitigation strategies are implemented by management. The Board also is apprised of particular risk management matters in connection with its general oversight and approval of corporate matters.

The Board has delegated oversight of the Company’s risk management process to the Audit Committee. Among its duties, the Audit Committee reviews with management (a) the Company policies with respect to risk assessment and management of risks that may be material to the Company, including cybersecurity and enterprise risk management, (b) the Company’s system of internal controls over financial reporting and (c) the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. During a typical quarterly meeting, the Audit Committee will invite one of the Company’s functional department heads (Leasing, Human Resources, Information Technology, Property Management, etc.) to present an overview of their operations, including staffing and risks inherent in each functional area, and how these are managed. In this way, the committee garners a good understanding of how risks arise throughout the business and what management’s mitigation strategies are. Periodically, the Audit Committee will also engage external firms to provide additional diligence and analysis. For example, in 2022, the Audit Committee reviewed a third-party assessment of our cybersecurity program maturity and reported these results to the Board.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee regularly receives memoranda or briefings by legal advisors on topics such as governance trends, and at least annually reviews with the Company’s general counsel and compliance officer, who reports to the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President in these roles, the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, including its annual training program covering, among other things, the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Insider Trading Policy, and the process for employees to file complaints for potential investigation by the legal department or outside advisors, as warranted.

In addition, the Compensation Committee considers the risks to the Company’s stockholders and to achievement of our goals that may be inherent in the Company’s compensation program.

Our other Board committees also consider and address risk as they perform their respective committee responsibilities. For example, the Investment and Finance Committee will regularly consider upcoming debt maturities of the Company and its subsidiaries, and any associated derivatives in place and hedging policies and procedures related thereto. When potential acquisitions, dispositions, or financings within its jurisdiction are presented to the committee, or to the Board, risks inherent in these transactions (e.g., market risk, leasing risk, financing risks, counterparty risks) are explicitly identified so that each risk which can be mitigated can be properly dealt with and appropriate conditions imposed to the consummation of each transaction.

All committees report to the full Board as appropriate, including when a matter rises to the level of a material or enterprise level risk.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
​

The Company’s management is responsible for day-to-day risk management, including the primary monitoring and testing function for companywide policies and procedures, and management of the day-to-day oversight of the risk management strategy for the ongoing business of the Company. This oversight includes identifying, evaluating and addressing potential risks that may exist at the enterprise, strategic, financial, operational and compliance and reporting levels. On an approximately bi-annual basis, this includes requiring selected managers to complete a formal survey of common risk topics that are ranked by potential likelihood and impact, and the most important topics are then further dimensioned by management and assigned to one or more specific senior executives for mitigation and monitoring by the CEO, COO and Audit Committee as needed.

We believe the division of risk management responsibilities described above is an effective approach for addressing the risks facing the Company and that our Board leadership structure supports this approach.

​

Director On-Boarding and Continuing Education

Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board has an orientation and on-boarding program as part of its effort to integrate new directors in their role and familiarize them with the Company. We also provide continuing education for all directors.

For new directors, our orientation program is tailored to the needs of each new director depending on his or her level of experience serving on other boards and knowledge of the Company or industry acquired before joining the Board. Materials provided to new directors include information on the Company’s business plan, financial matters, corporate governance practices, the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Insider Trading Policy, and other key policies and practices. New directors are typically already familiar with the members of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, but also meet with the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President before their first Board meeting and may also be assigned an existing director as a mentor. New Audit Committee members are provided with orientation materials targeted to that role provided by representatives from our independent registered accounting firm.

​

For all directors, representatives of management brief the Board regularly on topics designed to provide directors a deeper understanding of various aspects of our business. Continuing director education is provided during portions of Board and committee meetings and other Board discussions. Our focus is on items necessary to enable the Board to consider effectively longer-term strategic issues and topics that address their fiduciary responsibilities. For example, during 2021, the Board received a presentation from our Chief Information and Technology Officer on our cybersecurity protection program and then, as referenced above, the Audit Committee, which has been charged by our Board with overseeing cybersecurity risk, in 2022, reviewed a third-party assessment of our cybersecurity program maturity and reported these results to the Board. In other years, directors have been briefed on the status of the San Francisco real estate market and on capital market activities in the REIT sector.

​

The Audit Committee devotes time to educating committee members about various operational risk topics as well as new accounting rules and standards, and topics necessary to having a good understanding of our accounting practices and financial statements. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee regularly receives memoranda or briefings by legal advisors on topics such as governance trends. All of our directors are invited for tours of our properties, typically in the city where a Board meeting is occurring, or after a new acquisition.

​

Our Board’s engagement in the Company’s business, such as these on-site visits at our properties, provides it with useful information and perspectives.

​

​

​

​
​​

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Board currently consists of ten members. Each member of the Board is serving for a term of one year and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified. Their term expires at each annual meeting of stockholders. Our charter and bylaws provide that a majority of the Board may at any time increase or decrease the number of directors. However, the number of directors may never be less than the minimum number required by the MGCL which is one, and unless our bylaws are amended, more than ten.

At the 2023 annual meeting, all of the directors will be elected to serve until the 2024 annual meeting and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. The Board, upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, has nominated the following to serve as directors:

​

Each of these nominees is a current director of the Company. Ms. Sutter was elected by our Board to fill a vacancy arising in July 2022 when the Board was expanded to ten members. Ms. Sutter was recommended to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to serve as a director by our Chairman. As part of its diligence process, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also hired a nationally acclaimed independent search firm, Korn Ferry, to assist. The Board anticipates that each nominee will serve, if elected, as a director. However, if any nominee is unable to accept election, proxies voted in favor of such nominee will be voted for the election of such other person or persons as the Board may select.

Our bylaws provide for majority voting in uncontested director elections. Pursuant to our bylaws, in an uncontested election a director is elected if he or she receives more votes for his or her election than votes against his or her election. Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, any incumbent director who fails to be elected by a majority vote in an uncontested election is required to tender his or her resignation to our Board, subject to acceptance, and any nominee who is not yet a director must receive a majority of votes for his or her election to be effected. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will make a recommendation to our Board on whether to accept or reject the resignation, or whether other action should be taken. Our Board will then act on our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation and publicly disclose its decision and the rationale behind it within 90 days from the date of the certification of election results. If the resignation is not accepted, the director will continue to serve until the next annual meeting and until the director’s successor is duly elected and qualified. The director who tenders his or her resignation will not participate in our Board’s decision.

We will treat broker non-votes as shares that are present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum. Abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, will have no effect on this proposal.

​

​

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
​

Information Regarding the Director Nominees

The following table and biographical descriptions set forth certain information with respect to each nominee for election as a director at the 2023 annual meeting, based upon information furnished by each director. The biographical information together with the table presented above under “Board Skills and Experience” and “Board Composition and Attributes”, includes the specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led to the conclusion by our Board that such person should serve as a director.

​

DIRECTOR NOMINEES

Biography

Mr. Behler has been our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President since 2014. Mr. Behler joined our company in October 1991 as President and Chief Executive Officer, where he oversaw all of the acquisitions and dispositions that produced our current portfolio of assets. Prior to joining our Company, Mr. Behler held various leadership positions at Thyssen, a German multinational conglomerate that he joined in 1973. He ran Thyssen Saudia Company, Ltd as Managing Director and was President of Thyssen Rheinstahl in Atlanta, Georgia from 1985 to 1991. In his positions with Thyssen, Mr. Behler was responsible for, among other duties, the acquisition, financing, development and disposition of more than ten million square feet of commercial real estate in various countries. Mr. Behler’s board and association memberships presently include serving as a member of The Real Estate Roundtable, Washington, D.C.; a member of the Board of Governors of the Real Estate Board of New York; a member of the Urban Land Institute, a member of the American Council on Germany’s Business Advisory Committee; and a member of the Board of Directors of Citymeals-on-Wheels. Mr. Behler is also a former member of the Executive Committee of the Greenprint Foundation and the Board of Directors of the ULI Greenprint Center for Building Performance, and a former Chairman of the Association of Foreign Investors in Real Estate (AFIRE).

Qualifications

Mr. Behler studied law at the University of Cologne and graduated from Georgia State University with a Master’s degree in Business Administration.

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
​

Biography

Mr. Armbrust has been a member of our Board since 2014. Mr. Armbrust was the Managing Director of CURA Vermögensverwaltung, a real estate management firm, from 1992 through 2019 and, since January 1, 2020, he has served as chairman of its supervisory board. From 1985 to 1992, Mr. Armbrust was Vice President Tax, Accounting, Reporting and M&A of Gruner & Jahr Publishing Group, Hamburg. Prior to that, Mr. Armbrust held various other finance positions since 1977. Mr. Armbrust served as a member of the supervisory board of Otto Versand, an international retailer until February 29, 2020. He serves as chairman of the supervisory board of ECE Group, an international shopping center manager and developer.

Qualifications

Mr. Armbrust studied national economics and received his Masters of Economics from the University of Mainz. Mr. Armbrust was selected to serve on our Board based on, among other things, his extensive experience in the real estate industry, his background in finance and his extensive knowledge of the Company.

​

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
​

Biography

Dr. Bussmann has been a member of our Board since March 2016. Dr. Bussmann served as a director and trustee of the Mannheim Trust in New York from 1998 to December 2022, where he was responsible for the investment and management of its assets in real estate, private equity and financial investments in public equity and fixed income. During that period, he also served as director or manager of a number of the Mannheim Trust portfolio companies, including Mannheim Holdings LLC and Mannheim Real Estate LLC and their subsidiaries. He was a board member of the private Cellwar Holding AG in Switzerland and, after its reorganization, as President of Rhodanie Investment AG before its liquidation. From 1998 to 2005, he was co-trustee of the Marico Trust in New York, and from 1995 to 1998 he was manager of Margna SA/Margna Holding SA, a Luxembourg company that invested in European blue chip stocks. Prior to holding these positions, from 1980 until 1994, Dr. Bussmann spent 15 years in the pharmaceutical and chemical industries in Germany and the United States, at Knoll AG, Abbott Laboratories, BASF AG and BASF Corporation.

Qualifications

Dr. Bussmann received his Dr. juris utriusque degree from Heidelberg University and in 1977 was a Visiting Scholar at Harvard Law School. In 2021-2022 he was a Fellow in the Harvard Advanced Leadership Initiative. Dr. Bussmann was selected to serve on our Board based on, among other things, his extensive background in finance and his senior leadership background.

​

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
​

​

Biography

Ms. Klein has been a member of our Board since March 2016. Ms. Klein has been a founding partner of Bloomberg Beta, a venture capital firm which invests in early stage technology companies that make businesses work better, since 2013. Prior to launching Bloomberg Beta, Ms. Klein led new initiatives at Bloomberg L.P. from 2010 to 2013. Before joining Bloomberg L.P., from 2000 to 2010, Ms. Klein served in various roles at SoftBank, a global company which provides information technology and telecommunication services. Previously, she also held various investing and operating roles at several investment companies and co-founded a children’s education business. Ms. Klein has also served on the board of directors of Regency Centers Corporation since 2019.

Qualifications

Ms. Klein graduated summa cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa, and as a Joseph Wharton Scholar with a Master of Business Administration and a Bachelor of Science from The Wharton School and a Bachelor of Arts from the Annenberg School for Communication at the University of Pennsylvania. Ms. Klein was selected to serve on our Board based on, among other things, her extensive experience in technology-related industries, and her senior leadership background.

​

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
​

Biography

Dr. Linneman has been a member of our Board since 2014. From 1979 to 2011, Dr. Linneman was a Professor of Real Estate, Finance and Public Policy at the University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School of Business and is currently an Emeritus Albert Sussman Professor of Real Estate there. Dr. Linneman is also currently a principal of Linneman Associates, a real estate advisory firm, and a principal of American Land Funds, a private equity firm. Dr. Linneman has served on over 20 public and private company boards, including serving as Chairman of the Board of Rockefeller Center Properties, Inc., a REIT, as a member of the board of trustees of Equity Commonwealth (formerly known as CommonWealth REIT), a publicly-traded REIT, and as a member of the board of directors of Regency Centers Corporation, a publicly-traded REIT. Dr. Linneman is also currently serving as an independent director of AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc., a publicly-traded REIT. Dr. Linneman previously served as a director of Equity One, Inc., prior to its merger with Regency Centers Corporation, Bedford Property Investors, Inc., Atrium European Real Estate Ltd, and JER Investors Trust, Inc., a finance company that acquires real estate debt securities and loans.

Qualifications

Dr. Linneman holds both Masters and Doctorate degrees in economics from the University of Chicago and a Bachelor of Arts degree from Ashland University. Dr. Linneman was selected to serve on our Board based on, among other things, his experience over many years in financial and business advisory services and investment activity and his experience as a member of numerous public and private boards, including several real estate companies.

​

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
​

Biography

Ms. Otto-Bernstein has been a member of our Board since 2014. Ms. Otto-Bernstein is an award winning, Emmy-nominated writer and film maker, who began her career as a journalist. Currently, she is the President of Film Manufacturers Inc., an international production company specializing in the development, production and co-production of high quality fiction and non-fiction motion pictures, as well as selected works for stage and print, a position which she has held since 1992. Ms. Otto-Bernstein is also a principal owner of ECE Group, an international shopping center manager and developer, and a member of the board of directors of CURA Vermögensverwaltung, a real estate management firm. Ms. Otto-Bernstein is the chair of the Dean’s Council of the Columbia University School of the Arts and was awarded the Columbia University Alumni Medal of Achievement in 2009. She is also a member of the board of directors of the Metropolitan Opera and of the International Council of the Guggenheim Museum and served for ten years on the board of the Wildlife Conservation Society.

Qualifications

Ms. Otto-Bernstein received a Bachelor of Arts from Columbia College in philosophy and political science and a Master of Fine Arts in film from Columbia University. Ms. Otto-Bernstein was selected to serve on our Board based on, among other things, her significant ownership interest in the Company and experience in the real estate industry.

​

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
​

Biography

Mr. Patterson has been a member of our Board since 2018. Mr. Patterson has, since 2010, been President of MRP Holdings LLC and serves as a real estate consultant and financial advisor. He is also an Advisory Director of Investcorp, Inc. and a Senior Advisor to Rockefeller Capital Management. From August 2010 until January 2015, Mr. Patterson served as Chief Executive Officer of Boomerang Systems, Inc. In August 2015, Boomerang Systems, Inc. filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Until January of 2009 Mr. Patterson was a Managing Director and the Head of Real Estate Global Principal Investments at Merrill Lynch where he oversaw the real estate principal investing activities of the firm. Mr. Patterson joined Merrill Lynch in April 2005 as the Global Head of Real Estate Investment Banking and in 2006 also became the Co-Head of Global Commercial Real Estate which encompassed real estate investment banking, principal investing and mortgage debt. Prior to joining Merrill Lynch, he served as the Global Head of Real Estate Investment Banking at Citigroup from 1996 until 2005. Mr. Patterson currently serves on the board of directors for UDR, Inc. and Digital Realty Trust, Inc., is the Chairman of the Board of Americold Realty Trust, Inc., and is a former director of GGP, Inc. Throughout his career, Mr. Patterson has been involved in a variety of financing and investing activities spanning virtually all types of real estate in most major global property markets.

Qualifications

Mr. Patterson has a Bachelor of Business Administration degree from the College of William and Mary, and a Master of Business Administration degree from the Darden School of Business at the University of Virginia. He is also a Certified Public Accountant. Our Board selected Mr. Patterson to serve as director because it believes he possesses, among other things, valuable financial and real estate industry expertise, including extensive experience working with public companies in the real estate industry, as well as experience on public company boards, and his senior leadership background.

​

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
​

Biography

Mr. Saito has been a member of our Board since 2022.

​

Mr. Saito was the Senior Executive Managing Director and Global Head at Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd., the largest publicly traded real estate developer in Japan from 2008 to 2017. Being promoted to a board member in 2011, Mr. Saito had been directly involved in all of the global acquisitions and developments, substantially growing the portfolio to what it is today, including 55 and 50 Hudson Yards in New York as well as the BBC Television Centre in London. After joining Mitsui Fudosan in 1976, he served as CEO of Mitsui Fudosan America from 1998-2002 and Chairman of Mitsui Fudosan America’s Halekulani Corporation and Mitsui Fudosan UK from 2008-2017, before retiring in 2020. Since 2019, Mr. Saito has served as outside director and Chairman of the Advisory Committee of Tokyo Gas Company Ltd. and as Chairman of the Nomination Committee since 2021. He has also been serving as outside director of Globeship Corporation since July 2019. Previously, Mr. Saito was ULI Japan Council‘s Chairman from 2010-2012, and Trustee in Japan from 2010-2016. From 2010-2016, he was a member of Keizai Doyukai (Japan Association of Corporate Executives) and Vice Chairman of China Committee. Mr. Saito also was a member of Keidanren (Japan Business Federation) from 2010-2017. He previously served as a member of our Advisory Board from 2020 to 2022.

​

Qualifications

Mr. Saito graduated from Hitotsubashi University with a Bachelor’s degree in commerce and management in 1976. Mr. Saito was selected to serve on our Board based on, among other things, his real estate industry experience, his diverse background, knowledge of other industries and his senior leadership experience.  

​

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
​